May the source be with you, but remember the KISS principle ;-)
Aftermath of US Presidential Elections of 2020
The aftermath of 2020 election revolved around claims of election fraud and it can be viewed as the start of the constitutional crisis in the USA -- the next stage of
the crisis of legitimacy of neoliberal elite
The neoliberal experiment – lower taxes on the rich, deregulation of labor and product markets, financialization, and
globalization – has been a spectacular failure. Growth is lower than it was in the quarter-century after the second world war,
and most of it has accrued to the very top of the income scale. After decades of stagnant or even falling incomes for those below
them, neoliberalism must be pronounced dead and buried.
Vying to succeed it are at least three major political alternatives: far-right nationalism, centre-left reformism and the progressive
left (with the centre-right representing the neoliberal failure). And yet, with the exception of the progressive left, these alternatives
remain beholden to some form of the ideology that has (or should have) expired.
The centre-left, for example, represents neoliberalism with a human face. Its goal is to bring the policies of former US president
Bill Clinton and former British prime minister Tony Blair into the 21st century, making only slight revisions to the prevailing
modes of financialization and globalization. Meanwhile, the nationalist right disowns globalization, blaming migrants and foreigners
for all of today’s problems. Yet as Donald Trump’s presidency has shown, it is no less committed – at least in its American variant
– to tax cuts for the rich, deregulation and shrinking or eliminating social programmes.
Neoliberalism
must be pronounced dead and buried. Where next?
by Joseph Stiglitz
The Guardian
may 30, 2019
A house divided against itself cannot stand ~Abraham Lincoln
Neoliberal elite celebrated the fact that Trump was deposed. And there are definitely positive aspects of this. But what they do
not understand, or do not wish to understand, is the revolt against neoliberalism that brought Trump to power did not dissipate. In
other words their victory is yet another Pyrrhic victory and it will definitely create new Trumps. New fighters against neoliberal
globalization, including unlimited movement of workers and immigrant and offshoring of manufacturing.
We will not moralize about whether the victory of globalists was a dirty and comes at the cost of destroying
the trust in the US election. Color revolutions (and this coup against Trump was a color revolution) are always dirty and always
involve intelligence agencies and bought journalists and MSM outlets. That's the nature of the beast. The real problem
is that neoliberal elite lost the legitimacy in 2016 and did not restore it in 2020. So, in a sense, no matter how one judge
2020 election Biden administration will, by definition, lack the legitimacy.
The Presidential elections of 2020 were less a referendum on neoliberal globalization than 2016 election. This happened mainly to COVD-19
epidemic and coursed by it recession. Also Trump self-destruct betraying his electorate, pandering to Israel lobby and
neocons. In short governing as Bush III. He also proved to be mediocre (or worse) politician. This combination of factors
favored classic neoliberals to take back power from "national neoliberals" like Trump.
Also it demonstrated the power of dirty "troika" of Amazon (WaPo, control of AWS), Facebook and Twitter and their ability
to influence election by pushing the desired narrative and suppressing all alternative information.
But "COVID junta" faces litany of structural problems
which they in no way are ready or willing to solve. Add to this the fact, that expected by neoliberal democrats the "Blue wave" that will give them
not only both Presidency and the control of Senate and the House, simply did not happened. Getting equal number of Senate
seats required from them inordinate amount of money and efforts( including the mobilization all of their resource for the
utilization of mail-invoting bonanza, created under false pretext of COVID-19 scare) while fighting against weak Republican
candidatures. Despite all his blunders and
"pro-rich" tax cut Trump retained a larger part of his voting base, then it was expected, and that helped Republicans to preserve their standing in
Senate and, paradoxically, increase their block in the House.
Looks like people were not exited about the idea of the restoration of neoliberal globalization and the return to the status quo which
existed before Trump. Which is the only agenda Biden proposed under the disguise of the "return to normal" (meaning
Clinton-style normal ;-)
People still hate neoliberalism and neoliberal Dems, and, paradoxically, neoliberal Dems managed to create a situation
in which many people hate them more then Republicans (which was and is the party of big business). Which is not that surprising, if we think about neoliberal Dems as sellouts
to Wall Street interests and financial oligarchy.
Both 2020 election were nor about Trump or Biden (both are dismal candidates, with Biden being a war criminal, if judged by
Nuremberg tribunal standards), but about the course
the country should take to escape from the crisis of neoliberalism which started in 2008.
Biden (who represent Clinton faction of Democratic
Party) proposed the return to the "status quo" (which deceptively marketed as the "return to normal") which existed before 2016. Which
is both impossible and dangerous idea, as you can't enter the same river twice. Both the country and the world changed.
Trump did not proposed anything -- his campaign was based on personality and did not have any distinct agenda outside of mainstream
Bush-style conservatism (which would be difficult in case case due to betrayal of his elections 2016 agenda).
But the most interesting part is that it look like neoliberal Dems tried to manipulate election in their favor resorting to
voting fraud and this way they caused a constitutional crisis in the USA, which might
have profound implications for the future of the country.
And the attempt to swipe it under the rag via Trump impeachment leave a bitter taste in the mouth.
In reality, Biden's domestic program and, especially, foreign policy program, do no differ much from Trump. In foreign policy both are neocons and Zionists;
in essence Biden is Trump-light or "Trump with a human face" if you wish. Similarly Blinken is Pompeo light (this is true
at least for their weights ;-). But "kicking the neoliberal can down the rod" policies did not address the huge
problems facing the country and gives
Republican incentive to block most of their legislative initiatives with the goal to capture the House in 2022 on the wave of voters
disappointment with the performance of Biden Government. What country needs is a kind of the New Deal II and rejection of
neoliberalism on official (both parties and the government) levels. Which is about asking for two much as both parties are so
married to neoliberalism that they will go over the cliff with it.
Trump had spend all his political capital and after he got into Dec 6 trap his legitimacy
will be questioned even more forcefully than in 2016 when neoliberal MSM launched Russiagate hoax against him, supported by powerful factions
within the major US intelligence agencies and the Republican Party.
While 2020 election was less then 2016 referendum on neoliberalism and neoliberal globalization, the issue of the collapse of
neoliberal ideology remains. And it will affect the future of the global, governed from Washington, neoliberal empire.
The neoliberal elite that supports neoliberal globalization and that was defeated in 2016 returned to power. They forgot nothing and learned nothing.
As such the result of this election represent not normalization, but a counterrevolution.
Neoliberalism remains in zombie state which it entered in 2016. The only avenue to maintain the status qui is false flag operations and repressions.
And we see implementation of this strategy, not without help from intelligence agencies, which created the
wave of Neo-McCarthyism and gaslighted the population of the country with "Russian threat" for four years.
And that happened despite the fact that we all now live in the period of collapse of neoliberalism and cracks within the
society. Part of this sad state of affairs can be explained by Trump flaws and the fact that he betrayed his voters both in his domestic
policies and foreign policy.
In 2021 the market fundamentalism and neoliberal globalization approached the end of their shelf lives. They caused the slide of the standard of living
of lower 80% of the USA population. They actually prevent realization of democracy, replacing the notion "one person one vote" with
the notion "one dollar one vote" (money as free speech).
Neoliberals put economic growth above the value of having a healthy middle class, leading to century-high levels of inequality. It
emphasized individuals over communities and divided us by race, class, and culture. And because it preferred markets to democracy, it
looked away as the wealthiest people and corporations rigged the government to serve their own interests, even at the expense of everyone
else:
This is not an ordinary political moment. Everywhere around us, the old order is collapsing. The golden age of postwar economic
growth is over, replaced by a new Gilded Age of inequality and stagnation... People once united by common culture and information
are now fractured into social media echo chambers.
The [neoliberal international order is cracking as nationalism grows in strength and global institutions decay. The United States’
role as a global superpower is challenged by the rising strength of China and a new era of Russian assertiveness.
Optimists hope that generational and demographic change will restore inexorable progress. Pessimists interpret the current moment
as the decline and fall of democracy.
.. we are currently in the midst of one of these epochal transitions. We live on the edge of a new era in politics — the
third since the Great Depression and World War II. The first era is probably best described as liberal.... from the 1940s through
the 1970s, a version of political liberalism provided the paradigm for politics. Charting a path between the state control of communists
and fascists and the laissez-faire market that dominated before the Great Depression, liberals adopted a form of regulated capitalism.
Government set the rules of the road for the economy, regulated finance, invested to create jobs and spark consumer demand, policed
the bad behavior of businesses, and provided a social safety net for Americans. Big institutions—big government, big corporations,
big labor—cooperated to balance the needs of stakeholders in society. In the United States, it was called New Deal Liberalism. In
Europe, social democracy. There were differences across countries, of course, but the general approach was similar. ...even the conservatives
of the time were liberal. Republican president Dwight Eisenhower championed the national highway system and warned of the military-industrial
complex. President Richard Nixon said, “I am now a Keynesian in economics.” His administration created the EPA and expanded Social
Security by indexing benefits to inflation.
...since the 1980s, we have lived in a second era — that of neoliberalism. In economic and social policy, neoliberalism’s
tenets are simple: deregulation, privatization, liberalization, and austerity. Under neoliberalism, individuals are on their
own and should be responsible for themselves. Instead of governments, corporations, and unions balancing the interests of all stakeholders,
the primary regulator of social interests should be the marketplace. Neoliberals opposed unions and unionization, they wanted to
pursue vouchers instead of public provision of services, and they sought to shrink the size and functioning of government, even if
it meant a less effective government. Markets worked like magic, and market logic would be applied to all aspects of life. Around
the world, the neoliberal era came with an aggressive emphasis on expanding democracy and human rights, even by military force. Expanding
trade and commerce came with little regard for who the winners and losers were—or what the political fallout might be. ...It was
President Bill Clinton who said that the "era of big government is over" and who celebrated the legislation deregulating Wall
Street.
...With the election of Donald Trump, the neoliberal era has reached its end. While in control of the House, Senate,
and presidency, Republicans neither repealed the Affordable Care Act nor privatized Social Security and Medicare. Their party is
increasingly fractured between Trumpist conservatives, who are far more nationalist, and the never-Trump old-line conservatives like
Bill Kristol or Jeb Bush. An increasing number of people recognize that neoliberalism’s solutions are unsuited to the challenges
of our time.
I would recommend to listen to the interview by John Anderson by Victor Davis
Hanson -- US Election 2020 - YouTube. While he is a Trump supporter
many of his point sound relevant to people who consider Trump a short-lived aberration, which sooner of later will be deposed by the
neoliberal establishment (aka the "deep state"). And who, before this was fully cooped by Zionist lobby and the Republican establishment and pushed "tax cut for
the rich." For example, he pointed out that the primary role of pollsters is the suppression of votes.
Biden claim that he can fix the country is high questionable taking into account his record as a staunch neoliberal and
warmonger:
PorkyPricklyPants, 2 days ago
Joe Biden’s political Career by year:
1973 Biden enters politics
1974
1975
1976
1977 Biden fights to keep schools segregated because "allowing blacks to integrate would create a racial jungle"
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983 Biden taxes SS
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988 Ran for president but had to end it after getting busted for plagiarism
1989
1990 C’mon man, almost there
1991
1992
1993 Biden taxes SS again
1994 Biden writes the stop and frisk law which is what African Americans blame for systemic racism today
1995
1996
1997 Almost, not yet because y’know the thing
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008 Calls Obama the first articulate and clean mainstream African American
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020 and now he’s ready to "FIX" the Country.
Imagine being so dumb that you think the guy in office for 4 years is the problem and the guy in office for 47 YEARS is
the solution
Jeff Olp 1 day ago
President Trump is exposing the lie and corruption of the whole thing. That is why the old guard are so upset. Opening up the
eyes of the people about the lie they live is part of the reason I voted Trump. They can not let the debt slaves wake up to the
truth or their power is destroyed.
Every government on earth are part of the lie and corruption. They keep us divided so they can pit us against each other. Cruelty
they created but blame on others so they can have their power hungry appetite fed.
Doug Sjogren 1 day ago
Since the days leading up to the election I've felt as if the air had left the room and I was slowly suffocating. I couldn't
believe the world I was seeing. The poles were lying, legacy media was lying, big tech was lying, the FBI was lying and I was
slowly dying inside. My hope was leaving for sure. T
he last hour listening to this man speak with such clarity, and intelligence has become a rush of fresh air into the room.
I again have hope for the future of this country because the left has made such a huge mistake in ignoring the middle class in
the election. They really thought that we couldn't see thru all of this bullshit. The people who stole this election from Trump
and the conservative Americans will have their day of reckoning.
They will lose the race because they have lost every shred of their credibility. It will start in two years when they loose
the House and in another two years when they loose the White House and the Republicans have a super majority with the House, the
Senate, and the Supreme Court. Thank you Donald Trump, for taking all of the rocks and arrows. You will never be forgotten for
pulling the drain stopper in the swamp.
Crisis of neoliberalism will not magically disappear in 2021. It might get worse due to effects of the COVID19 pandemics.
In foreign policy Biden was always a neocon warmonger, so members of his cabinet probably will not differ much from Trump. So the
Secretary of State might be less abrasive then Pompeo, but the policies stay the same: attempt to preserve and whoever possible to
expand
the global neoliberal empire governed from Washington.
In Domestic policy Biden represents a mix bag. On one hand he needs to placate "progressives" support of which contributed to his
victory. On the other he remains staunch neoliberal and it is difficult to teach old dog new tricks
First of all Biden has Chinagate waiting for him in the wings. Also relations with Russia are already
at such a low point that the next step down might be, God forbid, shooting. In other words he has very few degrees of freedom. Biden
was an important player in Russiagate hoax, so it is reasonable to expect that everything will be spoiled and toxic in this area
in his administration. And this fact hangs like albatross around his neck.
Another important negative factor is that Biden will probably appoint way too many female chickenhawks in his administration.
Suffering from the "inferiority complex" those chickenhawks will probably be way too jingoistic, and will contribute to the adoption of
the most dangerous and counterproductive foreign policies. For example, in Syria.
On domestic front the key USA problem -- mass unemployment will not subside. As Biden is Wall Street stooge he will do nothing
serious about it. Race relations, aggravating by BLM and antifa riots and destruction of monuments, will only get worse with "race-neutral"
white American probably moving to the right.
The measure taken against COVID-19 epidemic by COVID-19 junta probably will worsen that state of the economic in the USA
dramatically and increase unemployment to the levels of Great depression. Several important industries such as hospitality
industry, restaurants, health clubs, theaters and entertainment industry in in general, and airlines already took severe hits
and probably will not recover. Those hits will propagate down the food chain to cause additional shocks.
The fundamental
problems, he says, are a dark triad of social maladies: a bloated elite class, with too few elite jobs to go around; declining
living standards among the general population; and a government that can’t cover its financial positions.
...The problems are deep and structural—not the type that the tedious process of democratic change can fix in time to forestall
mayhem. Turchin likens America to a huge ship headed directly for an iceberg: ‘If you have a discussion among the crew about which
way to turn, you will not turn in time, and you hit the iceberg directly.’
The past 10 years or so have been discussion. That sickening
crunch you now hear—steel twisting, rivets popping—is the sound of the ship hitting the iceberg.
Pennsylvania 's
top election official has decertified the voting system of rural Fulton County for future elections, saying
that an election assessment by a third party had violated the Keystone State's election code,
according to a release on Wednesday.
Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid, an appointee of Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf,
informed the Fulton County Board of Elections that she "did not arrive at this decision
lightly."
Wake Technology Services Inc. (Wake TSI), a software company based in West Chester,
Pennsylvania, had carried out an election assessment that involved its workers visiting Fulton
County in December 2020 and in early February.
The company in May released a report that concluded the election was "well-run" and did not
indicate any signs of fraud in Fulton County. However,
five "issues of note" were uncovered , three of which are related to Dominion Voting Systems ,
whose electronic voting system was used in the county for the 2020 election.
"While these may seem minor, the impact on an election can be huge," Wake TSI said of the
five issues. At the time, Dominion disputed the report's findings.
The Pennsylvania Department of State said in a statement on Wednesday that
Wake TSI's access to the Fulton County's voting system "undermined the chain of custody
requirements and strict access limitations necessary to prevent both intentional and
inadvertent tampering with electronic voting systems."
It added that the "unauthorized access" prevents the vendor -- Dominion -- from "affirming
that the system continues to meet state and federal certification standards."
Fulton county officials had allowed Wake TSI to "access certain key components of its
certified system, including the county's election database, results files, and Windows systems
logs," and to "use a system imaging tool to take complete hard drive images of these computers
and other digital equipment," the department noted.
"These actions were taken in a manner that was not transparent," Degraffenreid said in her
letter to Fulton County officials on Tuesday. She said the access given to Wake TSI has
caused Fulton County's voting system to be "compromised," and that neither the county, state
officials, nor Dominion could now "verify that the impacted components of Fulton County's
leased voting system are safe to use in future elections."
"I have no other choice but to decertify the use of Fulton County's leased Dominion
Democracy Suite 5.5A voting system last used in the November 2020 election," Degraffenreid
wrote.
The Fulton County Board of Elections and Wake TSI did not immediately respond to requests
for comment.
The Pennsylvania Department of State previously said that a risk-limiting audit of the 2020
election has confirmed the state's election results.
The
Pennsylvania Capital-Star reported that Fulton County needed to pay $25,000 to lease new
equipment for its municipal elections in May, because Dominion refused to let the county use
the voting machines that Wake TSI had accessed. According to the outlet, Dominion told the
county that it violated its contract in letting a unaccredited and non-certified company
inspect the machines.
Wake TSI's assessment in Fulton County was "set" by Pennsylvania Sen. Doug Mastriano, a
Republican, according to a Dec. 31, 2020 document
signed by the company that was obtained and published by the Arizona Mirror and The Washington
Post. Wake TSI said in its report that Mastriano and Pennsylvania Sen. Judy Ward, also a
Republican, "were aware of our efforts."
The document also said that Wake TSI was "contracted to Defending the Republic," a nonprofit
founded by lawyer Sidney Powell, who has alleged that widespread fraud occurred in the 2020
election.
Mastriano earlier this month
issued letters to York, Tioga, and Philadelphia counties requesting that they voluntarily
submit information and materials by July 31, to enable what he calls a "forensic investigation"
of the 2020 and 2021 elections. He told The Epoch Times that he seeks for an investigation that
would be "a big deep dive, like we saw in Arizona, but even deeper."
Wake TSI was also involved in the election audit still underway in Arizona's Maricopa County
up until
its contract expired in May. The audit in Maricopa County was ordered by the Arizona state
Senate's Republican majority. Dominion machines in Maricopa County will also be
replaced .
Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, a Republican, said the machines were not tampered with
during the audit and questioned the Board of Supervisors' decision to get new machines.
"If their experts can't prove the machines have not been tampered with, then how does the
[Secretary of State's office] or County Elections certify the machines before every audit to
make sure the machines haven't been tampered with?" she asked in June.
Comments suggest high level of discontent amount this selected category of US citizens. How
large is such a group is anybody guess, but just the existence of such a group is a threat to the
current neoliberal system in which corruption is systemic indeed.
Update (1352ET): Oddly, right as Senate President Karen Fann suggested that auditors may not
be able to determine whether a ballot had been duplicated once, or ten times, YouTube pulled
the feed we had originally embedded , claiming it violated their Terms of Service.
An alternate stream has been embedded below.
* * *
The Arizona Senate is holding a public briefing with leaders of the ongoing election audit
authorized by Senate President Karen Fann.
Fann is joined by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Warren Peterson, along with Senate
audit liaison Ken Bennett and the leaders of two of the vendors hired to conduct the audit,
Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan and CyFIR founder Ben Cotton, according to KTAR .
Cyber Ninjas was hired as lead contractor for the audit, which started April 23 after the
Senate won a legal battle with Maricopa County for access to election equipment and
approximately 2.1 million ballots from the November 2020 general election in metro Phoenix.
Fann told KTAR News 92.3 FM's The Mike Broomhead Show on Tuesday that the number ballots
tallied during the audit didn't match the total documented by Maricopa County, but she didn't
know how far off the counts were.
Most audit operations have wrapped up, but counting machines are being used to recheck of
the total number of ballots, a process that was expected to continue into next week.
Audit officials have said a final report was expected to be released in late July or
August.
The U.S. House Oversight and Reform Committee sent Logan a letter Wednesday requesting
documentation about Cyber Ninjas' role in the audit, funding and possible connections to former
President Donald Trump or his surrogates.
Cyber Ninjas had no previous experience conducting election audits. Fann's selection of the
Florida-based firm's $150,000 bid quickly drew scrutiny over Logan's deleted Twitter account,
which had activity supporting unfounded election conspiracy theories.
The low bid doesn't cover the cost of the operation, expected to be in the millions, and
fundraising has been taking place in the name of the audit.
Fann has said the aim of the process is to restore faith in the election system and find
ways to improve Arizona's voting laws, not to reverse the result of the election.
However, many Trump supporters see it as a step toward invalidating President Joe Biden's
victory and returning Trump to office.
Attorney General Merrick Garland is the front-runner so far for 2021's bad timing prize. The
Justice Department last month rushed out a lawsuit claiming that Georgia's new election law
violates Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act only days before the Supreme Court laid down
standards that make the lawsuit a nearly certain loser.
Justice knew the likely timing of the Court's ruling in Brnovich v. DNC, so a fair guess is
that Mr. Garland succumbed to White House and progressive pressure to make a political
statement to support Democratic efforts in Congress to federalize state election laws in
H.R.1.
Bad call. Now federal judges hearing the case will have to contend with Justice Samuel
Alito's five principles in Brnovich as they assess the Georgia statute.
It won't be easy to find legal fault under those principles. Mere voting inconvenience can't
be considered disqualifying, since all voting imposes some inconvenience. Any specific voting
provision, such as the number of drop boxes, must also be considered in the overall context of
a state's voting rules. Georgia's rules are generally lenient and don't especially burden the
ability of minorities to vote.
Perhaps Justice can find a federal judge somewhere to rule against Georgia, but such a
ruling is unlikely to survive on appeal to higher courts. The legal and political result of the
lawsuit is therefore likely to vindicate Georgia Republicans during the 2022 election season or
leading up to 2024, depending on how the lawsuits proceed. Mr. Garland would be wise to drop
the suit in light of Brnovich, lest his term at Justice be marred by the continuation of this
patently political lawsuit.
Given what we have seen of Mr. Garland thus far in his questionable legal performance as AG,
it is looking like the Republicans were prescient in blocking his appointment to the Supreme
Court.
David Schmidt
Politics will always supersede good judgment.
DON WILLINGHAM
Yep, apparently its a burden for some of the libs to put a stamp on an ballot and mail it it
(I'm going one step beyond the extraordinary burden of getting off your behind to go to a
local polling location).
paul grunder
Looks like Coca Cola and Major L. baseball made a mistake. do you think they will have second
thoughts about leaving GA.? I know I now love Pepsi and don't watch baseball much at all
anymore. You can bet someone in each organization is saying, how do we save face over this.
p's wife
Brien Akers
None of this matters. Not lawsuits, not SCOTUS rulings, not State election laws, not lower
court rulings. None of it matters. Why? Because the Democrats know that they cannot win
without cheating as surely as they know the sun is going to rise tomorrow. That means they
will simply ignore all the laws and do they same thing in 2024 that they did in 2020. Ask
yourself this: Who's going to stop them? Question number two: Who will reverse the election
results?
DON WILLINGHAM
Tell us what citizen cannot vote in the next election? (no, felons don't count). Its not
hard to vote. Besides, where were all the whiners 4 years ago, 8 years, 20 years ago if GA's
laws were so restrictive. This is such nonsense.
Greg Elsden
I say keep going, Garland. Your party is known for epic fails (eg Russian Delusion and two
impeachments).
Steven S
The chances of DoJ voluntarily dismissing its lawsuit against Georgia's
more-lax-and-liberal-than-Delaware's voting regulations are somewhere between slim and none.
And Slim has left town.
Litigation of this kind takes years to wind its way through the lower courts and to reach
SCOTUS. By then, the Supreme Court could be packed with Justices of the same mindset as the
dissenters in Brnovich.
Only the "Jim Crow" Filibuster stands in the way of court packing.
David Alan
Another reminder that we dodged a bullet by not sending Merrick Garland through to
SCOTUS.
Robert Bridges
Amen to that. He isn't a moderate after all...
Jim Walsh
Democrats need the issue so that they can continue to use minorities, who they truly think
are too stupid to vote. It is insulting and stupid,
James Stock
Garland is really just a bureaucrat with a law degree. Deep down, he doesn't believe is this
ridiculous lawsuit. He made a deal with the devil by working for an incompetent president.
The voting measure has inflamed Republicans, who accused Democrats of engaging in
demagoguery.
"This bill is brazen," said Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas), ticking off a list of provisions in
the Democratic bill that he called damaging, including one that would shrink the Federal
Election Commission to five from six members, which he said would enable the president to turn
the agency into a weapon against political rivals. Mr. Cruz accused Democrats of "deliberately
inflaming racial tensions" by attacking policies like requiring voter identification that
Republicans say are designed to protect the integrity of the vote.
... ... ...
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D., Ore.), the sponsor of the Senate bill, a version of which
cleared the House in March , told CNN on Monday that there are ways to advance voting
legislation that would involve changing the filibuster, which requires three-fifths of the
Senate, or currently 60 members, to end debates and vote on most legislation.
"Fifty members getting into a room and deciding how we go forward will be kind of another
stage of how we proceed," Mr. Merkley said later on a call with activists.
The pressure-cooker environment in which the debate lands was highlighted by nascent
campaigns inside and outside the Capitol. Republicans are calling attention to a provision in
the Democrats' bill that would allow signatures in lieu of voter identification cards, saying
such a policy could be abused and would weaken trust in the validity of elections. A Monmouth
University poll released Monday found that 80% of Americans support requiring voters to show
photo identification to cast ballots.
Meanwhile, the progressive group Just Democracy is running ads aimed at Ms. Sinema,
suggesting that she is weak on voting policy because she hasn't come out in support of ending
the filibuster to make voting legislation possible.
Ms. Sinema is up for re-election in 2024. Her state is currently roiled by
an audit of votes cast in 2020 in Maricopa County, which Mr. Biden won, and is defending
some of its voting rules at the Supreme Court.
Ending the filibuster may get Democrats everything that the want for another 18 months. But
they will not be able to keep the legislation that they have passed.
As soon as control of both chambers and the White House passes to the other party, they
very quickly will repeal each and every bit of legislation that had been passed by the
Democrats.
At that point, Republicans will be able to pass absolutely everything that they want,
probably for 18 months.
By ending the filibuster we will get national laws that change with every change of
administration.
Aren't we better off, keeping the filibuster, so that nothing is ever accomplished by
either party? Deadlock.
Deadlock pleases politicians and the primary voters in their party, but it frustrates the
80% of Americans who are moderates. They want Congress to act to deal with the country's
problems. But deadlock it will be.
"... ...the prerogative to define extremism includes the power to attempt to banish certain ideas from acceptable discourse. The report warns that "narratives of fraud in the recent general election"¦ will almost certainly spur some [Domestic Violent Extremists] to try to engage in violence this year." ..."
"... If accusations of 2020 electoral shenanigans are formally labeled as extremist threats, that could result in far more repression (aided by Facebook and Twitter) of dissenting voices. ..."
...the prerogative to define extremism includes the power to attempt to banish certain ideas
from acceptable discourse. The report warns that "narratives of fraud in the recent general
election"¦ will almost certainly spur some [Domestic Violent Extremists] to try to
engage in violence this year."
If accusations of 2020 electoral shenanigans are formally labeled as extremist threats, that
could result in far more repression (aided by Facebook and Twitter) of dissenting voices.
How will this work out any better than the concerted campaign by the media and Big Tech last
fall to suppress all information about Hunter Biden's laptop before the election?
The Biden administration is revving up for a war against an enemy which the feds have chosen
to never explicitly define . According to a March report by Biden's Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, "domestic violent extremists" include individuals who "take overt steps
to violently resist or facilitate the overthrow of the U.S. government in support of their
belief that the U.S. government is purposely exceeding its Constitutional authority." But that
was the same belief that many Biden voters had regarding the Trump administration. Does the
definition of extremism depend solely on which party captured the White House?
The report notes that the "Department of Defense is reviewing and updating its definition of
prohibited extremist activities among uniformed military personnel." Bishop Garrison, the chief
of the Pentagon's new Countering Extremism Working Group, is Exhibit A for the follies of
extremist crackdowns on extremism. In a series of 2019 tweets, Garrison, a former aide to
Hillary Clinton,
denounced all Trump supporters as "racists." Garrison's working group will "specifically
define what constitutes extremist behavior" for American soldiers. If Garrison purges Trump
supporters from the military, the Pentagon would be unable to conquer the island of Grenada.
Biden policymakers also intend to create an "anti-radicalization" program for individuals
departing the military service. This initiative will likely produce plenty of leaks and
embarrassing disclosures in the coming months and years.
The Biden report is spooked by the existence of militia groups and flirts with the fantasy
of outlawing them across the land. The report promises to explore "how to make better use of
laws that already exist in all fifty states prohibiting certain private "˜militia'
activity, including"¦state statutes prohibiting groups of people from organizing as
private military units without the authorization of the state government, and state statutes
that criminalize certain paramilitary activity." Most of the private militia groups are guilty
of nothing more than bluster and braggadocio. Besides, many of them are already overstocked
with government informants who are counting on Uncle Sam for regular paychecks.
As part of its anti-extremism arsenal, DHS is financing programs for "enhancing media
literacy and critical thinking skills" and helping internet users avoid "vulnerability
to"¦harmful content deliberately disseminated by malicious actors online." Do the feds
have inside information about another Hunter Biden laptop turning up, or what? The Biden
administration intends to bolster Americans' defenses against extremism by developing
"interactive online resources such as skills-enhancing online games." If the games are as
stupefying as this report, nobody will play them.
The Biden report stresses that federal law enforcement agencies "play a critical role in
responding to reports of criminal and otherwise concerning activity." "Otherwise concerning
activity"? This is the same standard that turned prior anti-terrorist efforts into
laughingstocks.
Fusion Centers are not mentioned in the Biden report but they are a federal-state-local law
enforcement partnership launched after 9/11 to vacuum up reports of suspicious activity.
Seventy Fusion Centers rely on the same standard"""
If you see something, say something """that a senior administration official invoked in a
background call on Monday for the new Biden initiative. The Los Angeles Police Department
encouraged citizens to snitch on "individuals who stay at bus or train stops for extended
periods while buses and trains come and go," "individuals who carry on long conversations on
pay or cellular telephones," and "joggers who stand and stretch for an inordinate amount of
time." The Kentucky Office of Homeland Security recommended the reporting of "people avoiding
eye contact," "people in places they don't belong," or homes or apartments that have numerous
visitors "arriving and leaving at unusual hours," PBS's Frontline reported. Colorado's Fusion
Center "produced a fear-mongering public service announcement asking the public to report
innocuous behaviors such as photography, note-taking, drawing and collecting money for charity
as "˜warning signs' of terrorism," the ACLU complained.
Various other Fusion Centers have attached warning labels to gun-rights activists,
anti-immigration zealots, and individuals and groups "rejecting federal authority in favor of
state or local authority." A 2012 Homeland Security report stated that being "reverent of
individual liberty" is one of the traits of potential right-wing terrorists. The Constitution
Project concluded in a 2012 report that DHS Fusion Centers "pose serious risks to civil
liberties, including rights of free speech, free assembly, freedom of religion, racial and
religious equality, privacy, and the right to be free from unnecessary government intrusion."
Fusion Centers continue to be bankrolled by DHS despite their dismal record.
The Biden report promises that the FBI and DHS will soon be releasing "a new edition of the
Federal Government's Mobilization Indicators booklet that will include for the first time
potential indicators of domestic terrorism""related mobilization." Will this latest publication
be as boneheaded as the similar 2014 report by the National Counterterrorism Center entitled
"Countering Violent Extremism: A Guide for Practitioners and Analysts"?
As the Intercept
summarized , that report "suggests that police, social workers and educators rate
individuals on a scale of one to five in categories such as "˜Expressions of
Hopelessness, Futility,' "¦ and "˜Connection to Group Identity (Race, Nationality,
Religion, Ethnicity)' "¦ to alert government officials to individuals at risk of turning
to radical violence, and to families or communities at risk of incubating extremist
ideologies." The report recommended judging families by their level of "Parent-Child Bonding"
and rating localities on the basis in part of the "presence of ideologues or recruiters."
Former FBI agent Mike German commented, "The idea that the federal government would encourage
local police, teachers, medical, and social-service employees to rate the communities,
individuals, and families they serve for their potential to become terrorists is abhorrent on
its face."
The Biden administration presumes that bloating the definition of extremists is the surest
way to achieve domestic tranquility. In this area, as in so many others, Biden's team learned
nothing from the follies of the Obama administration. No one in D.C. apparently recalls that
President Obama perennially denounced extremism and summoned the United Nations in 2014 to join
his "campaign against extremism." Under Obama, the National Security Agency
presumed that "someone searching the Web for suspicious stuff" was a suspected extremist
who forfeited all constitutional rights to privacy. Obama's Transportation Security
Administration relied on
ludicrous terrorist profiles that targeted American travelers who were yawning, hand
wringing, gazing down, swallowing suspiciously, sweating, or making "excessive complaints about
the [TSA] screening process."
Will the Biden crackdown on extremists end as ignominiously as Nixon's crackdown almost 50
years earlier? Nixon White House aide Tom Charles Huston explained
that the FBI's COINTELPRO program continually stretched its target list "from the kid with a
bomb to the kid with a picket sign, and from the kid with the picket sign to the kid with the
bumper sticker of the opposing candidate. And you just keep going down the line." At some
point, surveillance became more intent on spurring fear than on gathering information. FBI
agents were
encouraged to conduct interviews with anti-war protesters to "enhance the paranoia endemic
in these circles and further serve to get the point across that there is an FBI agent behind
every mailbox," as a 1970 FBI memo noted. Is the Biden castigation campaign an attempt to make
its opponents fear that the feds are tracking their every email and website click?
Biden's new terrorism policy has evoked plenty of cheers from his Fourth Estate lapdogs. But
a
Washington Post article fretted that the administration's report did not endorse enacting
"new legal authority to successfully hunt down, prosecute, and imprison homegrown extremists."
Does the D.C. media elite want to see every anti-Biden scoffer in the land put behind bars?
This is typical of the switcheroo that politicians and the media play with the terms
"terrorists" and "extremists." Regardless of paranoia inside the Beltway, MAGA hats are not as
dangerous as pipe bombs.
The Biden report concludes that "enhancing faith in American democracy" requires "finding
ways to counter the influence and impact of dangerous conspiracy theories." Bu t permitting
politicians to blacklist any ideas they disapprove won't "restore faith in democracy."
Extremism has always been a flag of political convenience, and the Biden team, the FBI, and
their media allies will fan fears to sanctify any and every government crackdown. But what if
government is the most dangerous extremist of them all?
Georgia's secretary of state this week announced he is set to remove some 100,000 names from
voter rolls , the first major voting list maintenance following the 2020
election.
The names are being removed because of a National Change of Address form submitted to the
U.S. Postal Service, election mail being sent to them bouncing back; or having no contact with
elections officials for at least five years.
" Making sure Georgia's voter rolls are up to date is key to ensuring the integrity of our
elections, " Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger , a Republican,
said in a statement.
"That is why I fought and beat Stacey Abrams in court in 2019 to remove nearly 300,000
obsolete voter files before the November election, and will do so again this year. Bottom line,
there is no legitimate reason to keep ineligible voters on the rolls ," he added.
The case in question saw Abrams, a failed gubernatorial candidate, take Raffensperger to
court through her group Fair Fight Action. A judge ruled against the plaintiffs, but
Raffensperger's office eventually reinstated 22,000 names because, it said, it was interpreting
a state law differently. Fair Fight Action claimed the reinstatement came due to their
case.
Critics said they'd be reviewing the list of names set to be removed.
"The last time Secretary Raffensperger conducted a massive voter purge, he was forced to
admit 22,000 errors -- 22,000 Georgia voters who would have been kicked off the rolls were it
not for Fair Fight Action's diligence. We'll be reviewing the list thoroughly and reaching out
to impacted voters," Lauren Groh-Wargo, CEO of Fair Fight Action, told the
Atlanta Journal-Constitution .
The major maintenance is taking place separately from regular monthly removals of names for
felony convictions and deaths. It's the first major effort since 2019. Raffensperger's office
cited federal law as to why no such undertaking happened last year.
Voters who want to see if they face removal can visit this website . They will be able to block their
removal if they provide information within about a month.
Voters who are ultimately removed can reregister.
The number of removals is 1.3 percent of Georgia's registered voters.
1 hour ago
Amazing how 100,000 votes here and 100,000 votes there can swing an election. play_arrow 26
play_arrow
Solomonpal 1 hour ago
Or triple counted ballots and mysteriously appearing boxes from under the tables. View
the tapes and consider the source.
SoDamnMad 1 hour ago
Shout out here to Ruby Freeman and her daughter Shayne Moss for that "under the table"
trick.
Raffensperger got a kick back for installing Dominion voting machines to fix the
election.
personal109 4 minutes ago
Raffensperger better lawyer up, and while he's at it, get a criminal lawyer, he's gonna
need it.
KirkPatrickN 51 minutes ago
100,000 fake votes here, 100,000 fake votes there, and pretty soon your talkin' "real"
"President" who got 81M votes, the all time record, when Trump broke the previous all time
record with 73M. The same year.
Pro_sanity 46 minutes ago (Edited)
And the one who got 81M couldn't fill a middle school gym during the campaign. The other
overflowed major sports arenas with spillout to the streets.
Was the
"Capitol Riot" an Inside Job? IMO, good reasons to think so are surfacing. Putin's upped
the game by saying they could easily be considered political prisoners whose constitutional
and human rights are being violated. And given the FBI has orchestrated numerous terrorist
attacks in order to frame innocents provides some credibility to that possibility.
Comments for this article are pretty instructive about the particular strata of US population
mindset right now. Reminds the mood of dissidents in the USSR.
Tucker Carlson dropped several bombshells on his show Tuesday night, chief among them was
from a Revolver News report that the FBI was likely involved in organizing the Jan. 6 Capitol
'insurrection,' and were similarly involved in the kidnapping plot against Michigan Governor
Gretchin Whitmer .
" Why are there so many factual matters that we don't understand about that day? " asked
Carlson.
" Why is the Biden administration preventing us from knowing? Why is the administration
still hiding more than 10,000 hours of surveillance tape from the US capitol on January 6th?
What could possibly be the reason for that - even as they call for more openness... they could
release those tapes today, but they're not. Why?"
Carlson notes that
Revolver News has dissected court filings surrounding the Capitol riot, suggests that
unindicted co-conspirators in the case are likely to have been federal operatives.
We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6
-- and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those
indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and
egregious participants in the very so-called "conspiracy" serving as the basis for charging
those indicted.
The question immediately arises as to why this is the case, and forces us to consider
whether certain individuals are being protected from indictment because they were involved in
1/6 as undercover operatives or confidential informants for a federal agency.
Key segment from Tucker:
"We know that the government is hiding the identity of many law enforcement officers that
were present at the Capitol on January 6th, not just the one that killed Ashli Babbitt.
According to the government's own court filing, those law enforcement officers participated
in the riot - sometimes in violent ways . We know that because without fail, the government
has thrown the book at most people who were present at the Capitol on Jan. 6. There was a
nationwide dragnet to find them - and many are still in solitary confinement tonight. But s
trangely, some of the key people who participated on Jan. 6 have not been charged ."
Look at the documents , the government calls those people 'unindicted co-conspirators.'
What does that mean? Well it means that in potentially every case they were FBI operatives
... in the Capitol, on January 6th."
"For example, one of those unindicted co-conspirators is someone government documents
identify only as "person two." According to those documents, person two stayed in the same
hotel room as a man called Thomas Caldwell - an 'insurrectionist.' A man alleged to be a
member of the group "The Oathkeepers." Person two also "stormed the barricades" at the
Capitol on January 6th alongside Thomas Caldwell. The government's indictments further
indicate that Caldwell - who by the way is a 65-year-old man... was led to believe there
would be a "quick reaction force" also participating on January 6th. That quick reaction
force Caldwell was told, would be led by someone called "Person 3," who had a hotel room and
an accomplice with them . But wait. Here's the interesting thing. Person 2 and person 3 were
organizers of the riot . The government knows who they are, but the government has not
charged them. Why is that? You know why. They were almost certainly working for the FBI. So
FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on January 6th according to
government documents. And those two are not alone. In all, Revolver news reported there are
"upwards of 20 unindicted co-conspirators in the Oath Keeper indictments, all playing various
roles in the conspiracy, who have not been charged for virtually the exact same activities
and in some cases much, much more severe activities - as those named alongside them in the
indictments."
Revolver , meanwhile, has important questions about January 6th
In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers,
the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI , DOJ , Pentagon and
network news have labeled most
responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the
federal government, or informants of said agencies?
Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the
Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous "siege" and what roles did they play (merely
passive informants or active instigators)?
Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of
those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an
undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)?
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) has demanded an explanation from FBI Director Christopher Wray:
We recommend you read the entire
Revolver piece, which includes the fact that at least five individuals involved int he
"Whitmer Kidnapping Plot" were undercover agents and federal informants .
_Rorschach 7 hours ago
Just remember folks
a Klan meeting is always 33 FBI agents
and 2 ACTUAL white supremacists
Dragonlord 7 hours ago
No CIA? I am disappointed.
_Rorschach 7 hours ago (Edited)
Glowies are never at the meetings
theyre busy planting bombs for the false flag afterwards
Misesmissesme 6 hours ago
90% of "terrorists" would never commit acts of terror if the US Guv wasn't coercing them
to commit said acts. The wrong people are in jail.
Wonder who in government started the ball rolling on 9/11 before it got away from
them?
Sedaeng PREMIUM 6 hours ago
it never got away from them! They directed through and afterwards... Patriot act just
'happened' to be on standby just in case? ha!
Not Your Father's ZH 6 hours ago (Edited)
Amid this chronic Machiavellian conniving, here are creatures who know how to act
right:
"Civilization is a stream with banks. The stream is sometimes filled with blood from
people killing, stealing, shouting and doing things historians usually record; while on the
banks, unnoticed, people build homes, make love, raise children, sing songs, write poetry
and even whittle statues. The story of civilization is the story of what happened on the
banks. Historians are pessimists because they ignore the banks of the river." ~ Will
Durant, "The Story of Civilization"
"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a
monster. And if you gaze long into an abyss , the abyss also gazes into you." - Friedrich
Nietzsche
"Everything human is pathetic. The secret source of humor itself is not joy, but sorrow.
There is no humor in Heaven." ― Mark Twain
thomas sewell 6 hours ago
everything in the USA is bull sheet. its all polluted with mind fook.
the last 1+ year has gone beyond any psycho drama i could ever imagine.
krda 5 hours ago
Didn't Brennan issue the 9/11 hijackers' visas?
zedwork 1 hour ago
Yes, but no planes. That would have been way too risky when you can just add them into
the live feed later using CGI.
Bob Lidd 1 hour ago
You mean like what happen in the 1993 WTC bombing.....??
How there hasn't been a day of reckoning yet is beyond me.
SexyJulian 6 hours ago
And stacks of bricks.
E5 5 hours ago
The FBI does not have the right to commit a crime. They chose to run an operation they
should disavow all agents involved and they know it. Arrest them.
With Wray out there spreading fear about the Great White Supremacy Threat, you can bet
the FBI is working overtime to make something newsworthy happen. Remember folks: 3
"militia" = 2 FBI informants + 1 patsy
Until the JFK murder/coup is brought to light, you can bet it's all hoax, including
Trump being an 'outsider'. He's not. He did everything Israel told him to do.
GhostOLaz 3 hours ago
America's perception of the FBI comes from TV "programs", not history or reality.
Joiningupthedots 1 hour ago
"Why is the administration still hiding more than 10,000 hours of surveillance tape from
the US capitol on January 6th?"
For the same reason the UK government wont release the Skripal Tapes from Salisbury,
UK.......LMAO.
Its an inside job........OBVIOUSLY!
Faeriedust 2 hours ago
So. Incidents are being staged and then used as excuses for more draconian State
security powers. How is this different from the behavior of known historical groups such as
the SS and the KGB? How can this be interpreted except as the actions of a totalitarian
State?
Sizzurp PREMIUM 6 hours ago
Scary stuff. They manufacture their own crimes to suit their political narrative and
agenda. This is straight out of the Nazi playbook.
Garciathinksso 6 hours ago
this is SOP for FBI, long rich history of manufacturing crimes and low, mid and high
level corruption . Prior to that the BOI was even worse.
JaxPavan 7 hours ago remove link
The chickens coming home to roost.
This was a "color revolution" by us, against us. And, it was designed to fail. Like a
freakish side show.
Why? Let off political steam. Keep all the people in their respective aisle of the
democan and republicrat uniparty bus. Distract political attention away from the full
****** plandemic lockdowns. Keep the rest of the world agape for a few more years thinking
things will fall apart on their own, while their resources are extracted. . .
Jam 47 minutes ago
This scam getting some press now is better late than never, but not by much. Some of
these media types being all surprised by this must have lived pretty sheltered lives and
are lacking any street smarts. This set up was obvious since day one, this is the same
bunch that won't call out these crooks for rigged elections.
Oxygen Likes Carbon 48 minutes ago
It should be painfully clear that with the level of surveillance in 2021, nobody can
walk into high security governmental building, without being arrested. Let alone organize a
mass demonstration then go into Capitol Building during the day, while the politicians
being there, to take ... selfies.
... without some help, or coordination from some governmental services.
anti-bolshevik 7 hours ago (Edited)
Replace 'unindicted co-conspirators.' with Agent Provocateurs.
The entire chain-of-command that authorized / planned / executed / gave material support
to this Operation should be indicted and prosecuted.
In this course of its investigation, researchers at Fordham discovered that EVERY
SINGLE ONE of the 138 terrorist incidents recorded in the USA between 2001-2012 involved
FBI informants who played leading roles in planning out, supplying weapons, instructions
and even recruiting Islamic terrorists to carry out terrorist acts on U.S. soil.
Enraged 56 minutes ago
With FBI Director Comey, Assistant Director McCabe, and FBI agent/covert CIA agent
Strzok acting against President Trump, this should be considered treasonous, and hopefully
they will be prosecuted.
The question is who authorized the latest actions on January 6 since Comey, McCabe, and
Strzok were fired.
Conductor "Corn Pop" Angelo 38 minutes ago
I can think of two to start with. Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi. Both refused
additional security even after being told that the latest intel suggested there was going
to be a protest at the capital building on Jan 6th. The two were offered National Guard
troops, in addition to Capital Police, to help out, but refused. IIRC, both the Senate and
House Sgt at Arms lost their jobs over this, too
Make it three, Mayor Bowser had the same intel and did nothing
Andro1345 7 hours ago
These are old tricks by the FBI. They have been just as bad as the CIA for years.
So many instances going back so far. They plan things, set it up, help to encourage and
supply sheep to do these things. If I had someone trying to encourage me to get on board
something similar my first guess would be a government operative, seriously.
WeNamedTheDogIndiana 1 hour ago
I attended protests after the election, and it was obvious to be that the rallies at our
state capitol were infiltrated by FBI/deep state stooges. A number of them were talking
civil war, and said it too boldly in my opinion, and then many of them were carrying AKs,
when that was not necessary.
The only rally that I attended that seemed uncorrupted was the first protest in DC a few
weeks after the election.
taketheredpill 7 hours ago
Don't be shocked if the FBI funded some of the trips, hotels etc.
And for sure the FBI operatives "wound up" the participants...
But you won't find out for 10 years.
Alfred 7 hours ago
Not just infiltrated.
The FBI actually creates the organizations they then infiltrate.
Someone goes on a good rant here or there, can expect to be befriended by someone of
like mind. Thereafter that someone undergoes radicalization and then organization via FBI
sting ops. They get funding, they get resources, they get ready, they get busted.
Ha! It's all shake-n-bake, baby!
ProudZion 6 hours ago
...The proud boys was led by a FBI agent....
Mad Muppet PREMIUM 1 hour ago
They're called Agents Provacateurs and it's nothing new. The Government always initiates
the violence they say they want to prevent.
Ms No PREMIUM 1 hour ago remove link
"Informants" is a very misleading title. They aren't out there ferretting info of people
up to no good. It's more an infiltration and steering game and always has been.
They are basically agents without the boundaries of law. Good front guys too. They will
keep them out of trouble and protect them if they can but if it gets too hot they are
expendable and even easily patsied. It's all actually actually technically illegal because
even when they do real informant work it's actually entrapment.
We used to be protected from these things and now you see the reason behind that.
Nothing is new it just has different names and since it's always avoided by media, some of
it doesn't even have proper names, at least for the public.
It's basically false flag color revolution operations.
QuiteShocking 6 hours ago (Edited) remove link
The USA's standing in the world is vastly diminished by the continue lies and
mischaracterizations of what happened on Jan 6th by the democrats. The police officer died
from a stroke and not from the rioters. The unarmed white woman was executed by capital
police and no one was held responsible. The democrats have continued to blatantly lie and
mislead on what really happened on Jan 6th for political gain...
Max21c 7 hours ago
We recommend you read the entire
Revolver piece, which includes the fact that at least five individuals involved int
he "Whitmer Kidnapping Plot" were undercover agents and federal informants .
People were already aware that the FBI kidnapping plot against Michigan Governor
Gretchen Whitmer was an FBI thing from the start and all throughout. Just as many if not
most of these things are as they involve the secret police creating the plots and then
unraveling the plots they've created and managed and orchestrated all along the way.
Angular Momentum 7 hours ago
The states need to outlaw entrapment in cases like that. The FBI moles need to be
punished as severely as the dupes.
junction 7 hours ago
The FBI and the CIA apparently fund the so-call White Supremacist organizations. Your
tax dollars at work. Meanwhile, total silence for a decade from the FBI as Jeffrey Epstein
ran a transnational white slavery operation out of his Manhattan mansion, aided by the
Israeli Mossad.
Max21c 7 hours ago
The intelligence community and secret police community were well aware of what was going
on with the Epstein operation. It's not just the US side either as the UK and Israelis were
aware of it also.
Uncle Sugar PREMIUM 7 hours ago (Edited) remove link
Trump is better than Xiden, but
He left Chris Wray running the FIB
He didn't prosecute Comey, Brennan, anyone
He pushed the "Vax"
He spent worse than a drunken sailor
Conclusion - He's not the answer
OldNewB 6 hours ago
He should have pardoned Snowden.
otschelnik 7 hours ago
Well looks like the DOJ is bringing back the Obummer spygate team. John P. Carlin who
was head of DOJ/National Security Division is now deputy AG. He let the FBI give 4 civilian
contractors access to the NSA database for 702 inquiries, which Admiral Rogers stopped.
Also back is Lisa Monoco who oversaw the FISA warrants for Carter Page, and now she's going
to be heading up Garland's domestic terror task force.
That's all very ominous.
Farmer Tink 4 hours ago
I didn't realize that Carlin was back. He tried to defend his actions in the annual
report to the FISA court but Adm. Mike Rogers, on whose watch the NSA found out what the
DOJ was doing, carried the day. I also didn't realize that Lisa Monaco was the one in
charge of those illegal Page warrants. It's just sickening that they are being rewarded.
Thanks for the info.
glenlloyd 2 hours ago (Edited)
With such a high percentage of those 'involved' in the "insurrection" (said loosely
here) and the so called Whitmer kidnapping being from FBI / CIA / other intelligence
agencies AND those same people end up apparently being in leadership roles in these groups
that are supposedly going to be doing the kidnapping and insurrecting, then it's really
hard not to come to the conclusion that the fault was with the FBI et al.
It just seems like the FBI et al were way more involved in this than they should have
been, if you're going to suggest that it was the others that are to blame. The tough pill
to swallow is the claim that it was the people the FBI et al infiltrated and coerced into
do these things, that are to blame.
Things really do stink with this.
newworldorder 5 hours ago
How are these actions are not "entrapment."
InfiniteIntellRules 5 hours ago
I will stop, just too many tales of FBI corruption. Last 1
Under COINTELPRO, FBI agents infiltrated political groups and spread rumors that loyal
members were the real infiltrators. They tried to get targets fired from their jobs, and
they tried to break up the targets' marriages. They published deliberately inflammatory
literature in the names of the organizations they wanted to discredit, and they drove
wedges between groups that might otherwise be allied. In Baltimore, the FBI's operatives in
the Black Panther Party were instructed to denounce Students for a Democratic Society as "a
cowardly, honky group" who wanted to exploit the Panthers by giving them all the violent,
dangerous "dirty work." The operation was apparently successful: In August 1969, just five
months after the initial instructions went out, the Baltimore FBI reported that the local
Panther branch had ordered its members not to associate with SDS members or attend any SDS
events.
EVERY MAJOR EVENT. EVERY SINGLE TIME.
heehaw2 6 hours ago
All happened under Trumps watch. He said he was going to lead the March to Capital
building, then totally disappeared.
MrNoItAll 7 hours ago
Got to hand it to them. Those Fed guys sure know how to stage a riot to get media
attention and shape public opinion. How else could they explain why all the guard troops
were needed in D C. When getting them there could have been the primary goal of this staged
event.
lightwork 7 hours ago
In the early 70's it seemed that a government informant/ mole was instrumental in the
activities of virtually every left wing group in the country. It became common knowledge
that whomever was most vocal and advocated the most activist positions was usually "that
guy". It was effective since paranoia caused most groups to disintegrate.
otschelnik 8 hours ago remove link
Probably more snitches than that.
Oath Keeper Thomas Caldwell who is one of the lucky few released but still charged is a
former FBI contractor who had top secret security clearance according to his lawyer.
Proud Boy Enrique Tarrio who was arrested 2 days before the riot for vandalism (burning
a BLM banner), had been an informer to the FBI and law inforcement in Florida, according to
his lawyer.
They forgot Antifa and BLM in their list of groups.
State sponsored terrorist groups favored by Liberal Elites and their secret police are
generally omitted and immune.
heehaw2 6 hours ago
George Bush Senior, then head of CIA was in Dallas when JFK was assinated. Ol George
announced as President the New World order
QE49er 6 hours ago
Reichstag Fire style false flag.
Ruff_Roll 6 hours ago
It makes perfect sense that FBI or government supported operatives were acting as agents
provocateurs on 1/6, organizing and instigating the riot, and subsequently let off as
"unindicted co-conspirators." Pelosi was probably in on it, too.
TheySayIAmOkay 7 hours ago
This is the biggest "duh" ever. Of course the government is involved. Just like they
were in 9/11. Just like they were stealing the election. Just like they are in at least
some of these mass shootings (the FBI was warned about the Parkland shooter multiple
times). Just like they will be in the next big incident that massively strips rights from
the people.
The Deep State is real. And it is the upper echelons of the FBI, DHS, CIA, ATF, etc.
They are the shadow government that wags the tail. They can do whatever they want and
nobody can do anything about it. Do you think if Ted Cruz or Nancy Pelosi killed someone
they'd get away with it? No. They are figures. The limits of their power can be stripped
with a single, stupid, scandal. How about John Brennan? I have absolutely no doubt in my
mind he could. Because who will hold him accountable? Nobody in the CIA or FBI went down
for not listening to the FBI agent about the 20th hijacker. Mueller got PROMOTED! He's deep
state. Brennan was regional chief of the CIA in Riyadh leading up to 9/11. He got...
PROMOTED! Deep state.
3-fingered_chemist 7 hours ago
The fact the Capitol had essentially zero security the day all members were present to
tally the EC votes and people still think this wasn't faked?
Jim in MN 7 hours ago
Speaking as someone who actually attended the earlier 'Stop the Steal' rally in DC, I
said at the time that the Jan. 6th event didn't smell right and felt like a setup.
Recommended that folks stay away, expect trouble and stay frosty at that time.
Note that the FBI was/is also deeply involved in the BLM riots. AKA a criminal
conspiracy to destabilize US civil order. Of course a lot of mayors and police chiefs are
also involved in that criminal conspiracy.
The more you know.....
jammyjo 7 hours ago
FBI is making contact with unstable people, and do nothing but keep them on a list of
"assets" to be activated when needed.
Patmos 7 hours ago
Gives new meaning to false narrative. More than just spin, they actually create the
events themselves. Not quite a false flag, because nothing really happened.
Is anyone involved going to stand up and say no? Or have they all just decided to
reserve themselves to being corrupt little b!tches?
Feck Weed 7 hours ago
FBI is the US domestic secret police force for the Globalist Empire. Nationalism is the
enemy of the globalists...
The men on the street corners with "The End is Nigh" placards are beginning to
resemble Walter Kronkite in demeanor as well as credibility.
But then again Walter was one of the CIA's finest...
Nona Yobiznes 7 hours ago
I guess the crazy conspiracy theorists were right again.
benb 3 hours ago (Edited)
Dumb Hannity used to call the FBI "The Crown Jewel of Law Enforcement,."
C Rabbit PREMIUM 7 hours ago
Why has the FBI never released the surveillance videos from the Alfred P. Murrah
Buildings and the others around it from the morning of April 19, 1995. "It's still under
investigation."
Why have the videos from all around the Pentagon taken on the morning of 9/11 never been
released?
Why does the CIA refuse to release all of their files on the JFK assassination?
Why? Why? Why?
Muffdiver2269vIII 7 hours ago
Ahh, they are waiting for Durham to complete the reports?
wootendw PREMIUM 6 hours ago
"Congressman Matt Gaetz calls on FBI Director Christopher Wray to fully disclose the
role and involvement of FBI operatives during the January 6th Capitol riot."
That would be self-incrimination.
radical-extremist 7 hours ago (Edited)
FBI will never talk because that would be revealing "classified methods and
procedures".
Why of course they troll the boards looking for "extremists" to exploit. They befriend
them and groom them, until they eventually enable them to commit the crime itself.
Conspiracy to commit the crime isn't near as sexy as the real thing, let's put these people
away for life. If there's collateral damage now and then, so be it. "Justice" comes at a
cost. /s
If the prosecutor is obliged to choose his cases, it follows that he can choose his
defendants. Therein is the most dangerous power of the prosecutor: that he will pick people
that he thinks he should get, rather than pick cases that need to be prosecuted. With the
law books filled with a great assortment of crimes, a prosecutor stands a fair chance of
finding at least a technical violation of some act on the part of almost anyone. In such a
case, it is not a question of discovering the commission of a crime and then looking for
the man who has committed it, it is a question of picking the man and then searching the
law books, or putting investigators to work, to pin some offense on him. It is in this
realm-in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass,
or selects some group of unpopular persons and then looks for an offense, that the greatest
danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies. It is here that law enforcement becomes
personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or
governing group, being attached to the wrong political views, or being personally obnoxious
to or in the way of the prosecutor himself.
"They weren't just a crowd of robbers and rioters," Mr Putin said of the Trump supporters
who stormed Congress on 6 January and temporarily suspended a session to certify Mr Biden as
the winner of last November's election. "Those people had come with political demands."
When the forum moderator at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum suggested Mr
Putin's comments about the Capitol riot could see him banned from US social media platforms,
the Russian leader drew applause from the audience by retorting: "I don't give a damn about
being blocked somewhere."
Earlier this week, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the Capitol rioters were
being "persecuted" by the US government.
Some 500 suspects have been arrested for the riot, most of them charged with entering or
remaining in a restricted building or grounds. Many have been released pending trial, but some
are being held in solitary confinement.
A member of Mr Biden's own Democratic party, Senator Elizabeth Warren, has said some of the
defendants were being subjected to "cruel" treatment.
Mr Putin also rebuked the West for its criticism of Russian authorities' response to
anti-Kremlin demonstrations, including jailed opposition leader Alexei Navalny.
Opposition protests across Russia earlier this year were suppressed with crackdowns. Riot
police were seen beating and dragging protesters away, while thousands of people were
detained.
The Russian leader told business leaders that protesters in Europe have faced an even
tougher police response, with some shot in the eye by what he mockingly called "democratic
rubber bullets".
It is not clear what he was referring to, but a number of French demonstrators were blinded
by rubber bullets fired by police during the so-called yellow vest rallies that began in late
2018.
Believe it or not, the president says that human rights R us.
Hear that, BLM? Women? Asian Americans? Hispanics? homeless? heavily indebted students? .
. the list goes on.
Biden said so, May 30, 2021
"I had a long conversation -- for two hours -- recently with President Xi, making it clear
to him that we could do nothing but speak out for human rights around the world because
that's who we are. I'll be meeting with President Putin in a couple of weeks in Geneva,
making it clear that we will not -- we will not stand by and let him abuse those rights." . .
here
..reminds me of Aeschylus: "In war, truth is the first casualty."
"... No other book out there has the level of breadth on the history of US imperialism that this work provides. Even though it packs 400 pages of text (which might seem like a turnoff for non-academic readers), "How to Hide an Empire" is highly readable given Immerwhar's skills as a writer. Also, its length is part of what makes it awesome because it gives it the right amount of detail and scope. ..."
"... Alleging that US imperialism in its long evolution (which this book deciphers with poignancy) has had no bearing on the destinies of its once conquered populations is as fallacious as saying that the US is to blame for every single thing that happens in Native American communities, or in the Philippines, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, etc. Not everything that happens in these locations and among these populations is directly connected to US expansionism, but a great deal is. ..."
"... This is exactly the kind of book that drives the "My country, right or wrong" crowd crazy. Yes, slavery and genocide and ghastly scientific experiments existed before Europeans colonized the Americas, but it's also fair and accurate to say that Europeans made those forms of destruction into a bloody artform. Nobody did mass slaughter better. ..."
I'm a professor at the University of California San Diego and I'm assigning
this for a graduate class.
No other book out there has the level of breadth on the history of US imperialism that this work provides.
Even though it packs 400 pages of text (which might seem like a turnoff for non-academic readers), "How to Hide an Empire" is
highly readable given Immerwhar's skills as a writer. Also, its length is part of what makes it awesome because it gives it the
right amount of detail and scope.
I could not disagree more with the person who gave this book one star. Take it from me: I've taught hundreds of college students
who graduate among the best in their high school classes and they know close to nothing about the history of US settler colonialism,
overseas imperialism, or US interventionism around the world. If you give University of California college students a quiz on
where the US' overseas territories are, most who take it will fail (trust me, I've done it). And this is not their fault. Instead,
it's a product of the US education system that fails to give students a nuanced and geographically comprehensive understanding
of the oversized effect that their country has around our planet.
Alleging that US imperialism in its long evolution (which this book deciphers with poignancy) has had no bearing on the destinies
of its once conquered populations is as fallacious as saying that the US is to blame for every single thing that happens in Native
American communities, or in the Philippines, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, etc. Not everything that happens in these locations
and among these populations is directly connected to US expansionism, but a great deal is.
A case in point is Puerto Rico's current fiscal and economic crisis. The island's political class share part of the blame for
Puerto Rico's present rut. A lot of it is also due to unnatural (i.e. "natural" but human-exacerbated) disasters such as Hurricane
María. However, there is no denying that the evolution of Puerto Rico's territorial status has generated a host of adverse economic
conditions that US states (including an island state such as Hawaii) do not have to contend with. An association with the US has
undoubtedly raised the floor of material conditions in these places, but it has also imposed an unjust glass ceiling that most
people around the US either do not know about or continue to ignore.
To add to those unfair economic limitations, there are political injustices regarding the lack of representation in Congress,
and in the case of Am. Samoa, their lack of US citizenship. The fact that the populations in the overseas territories can't make
up their mind about what status they prefer is: a) understandable given the way they have been mistreated by the US government,
and b) irrelevant because what really matters is what Congress decides to do with the US' far-flung colonies, and there is no
indication that Congress wants to either fully annex them or let them go because neither would be convenient to the 50 states
and the political parties that run them. Instead, the status quo of modern colonial indeterminacy is what works best for the most
potent political and economic groups in the US mainland. Would
This book is about much more than that though. It's also a history of how and why the United States got to control so much
of what happens around the world without creating additional formal colonies like the "territories" that exist in this legal limbo.
Part of its goal is to show how precisely how US imperialism has been made to be more cost-effective and also more invisible.
Read Immerwhar's book, and don't listen to the apologists of US imperialism which is still an active force that contradicts
the US' professed values and that needs to be actively dismantled. Their attempts at discrediting this important reflect a denialism
of the US' imperial realities that has endured throughout the history that this book summarizes.
"How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States" is a great starting point for making the US public aware of
the US' contradictions as an "empire of liberty" (a phrase once used by Thomas Jefferson to describe the US as it expanded westward
beyond the original 13 colonies). It is also a necessary update to other books on this topic that are already out there, and it
is likely to hold the reader's attention more given its crafty narrative prose and structure
Read less 194 people found this helpful
Helpful
Comment
Report abuse
This is exactly the
kind of book that drives the "My country, right or wrong" crowd crazy. Yes, slavery and genocide and ghastly scientific experiments
existed before Europeans colonized the Americas, but it's also fair and accurate to say that Europeans made those forms of destruction
into a bloody artform. Nobody did mass slaughter better.
The author of this compelling book reveals a history unknown to many
readers, and does so with first-hand accounts and deep historical analyses. You might ask why we can't put such things behind
us. The simple answer: we've never fully grappled with these events before in an honest and open way. This book does the nation
a service by peering behind the curtain and facing the sobering truth of how we came to be what we are.
This is a stunning book, not to be missed. If you finished Sapiens with the feeling your world view had
greatly enlarged, you're likely to have the same experience of your view of the US from reading this engaging work. And like Sapiens,
it's an entirely enjoyable read, full of delightful surprises, future dinner party gems.
The further you get into the book the more interesting and unexpected it becomes. You'll look at the US in ways you likely
never considered before. This is not a 'political' book with an ax to grind or a single-party agenda. It's refreshingly insightful,
beautifully written, fun to read.
This is a gift I'll give to many a good friend, I've just started with my wife. I rarely write
reviews and have never met the author (now my only regret). 3 people found this helpful
This book is an absolutely powerhouse, a must-read, and should be a part of every student's curriculum in
this God forsaken country.
Strictly speaking, this brilliant read is focused on America's relationship with Empire. But like with nearly everything America,
one cannot discuss it without discussing race and injustice.
If you read this book, you will learn a lot of new things about subjects that you thought you knew everything about. You will
have your eyes opened. You will be exposed to the dark underbelly of racism, corruption, greed and exploitation that undergird
American ambition.
I don't know exactly what else to say other than to say you MUST READ THIS BOOK. This isn't a partisan statement -- it's not
like Democrats are any better than Republicans in this book.
This is one of the best books I've ever read, and I am a voracious reader. The content is A+. It never gets boring. It never
gets tedious. It never lingers on narratives. It's extremely well written. It is, in short, perfect. And as such, 10/10.
I heard an interview of Daniel Immerwahr on NPR news / WDET radio regarding this book.
I'm am quite conservative
and only listen to NPR news when it doesn't lean too far to the left.
However, the interview piqued my interest. I am so glad I
purchased this ebook. What a phenomenal and informative read!!! WOW!! It's a "I never knew that" kind of read. Certainly not anything
I was taught in school. This is thoughtful, well written and an easy read. Highly recommend!!
A judge in Georgia
told parties in an election integrity case on May 27 that a previously scheduled meeting at a
ballot storage warehouse was canceled after officials filed a flurry of motions in the case
.
Media crews film while election workers process absentee ballots at State Farm Arena in
Atlanta on Nov. 2, 2020. (Megan Varner/Getty Images)
Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero said a May 28 meeting was no longer taking
place because of motions filed by Fulton
County , the county's Board of Registration and Elections, and the county's clerk of
Superior and Magistrate Courts, a spokesperson for the court confirmed to The Epoch Times.
Amero said the motions must be heard before the plaintiffs can gain access to the absentee
ballots. He proposed a June 21 hearing, but the order scheduling the hearing hasn't yet been
filed.
"It seems like a desperation move. The silver lining is that we now have more time to
perfect the changes we had to make in our inspection plan," Garland Favorito, the lead
petitioner, told The Epoch Times via email.
County officials argued that the complaint filed by voters should be dismissed because the
petitioners failed to serve, or even attempt to serve, the county. They also said Fulton County doesn't have
final control over elections, that petitioners aren't entitled to declaratory judgment, and
that petitioners haven't complied with election contest requirements.
Amero heard in a hearing last week that petitioners weren't able to properly examine ballot
images they've received because of their low resolution -- 200 dots per inch (DPI). Amero
granted the petitioners' request to unseal the mailed ballots and said they could go to
where they were stored in order to observe county workers create higher resolution images of
the ballots.
Amero mentioned during the hearing that no parties had filed a motion to dismiss, allowing
petitioners to obtain some discovery.
During the hearing, lawyers for the county urged the judge not to grant access to the
ballots.
Before the latest update in the case, some officials had supported the ballot
examination.
"From day one, I have encouraged Georgians with concerns about the election in their
counties to pursue those claims through legal avenues. Fulton County has a long standing
history of election mismanagement that has understandably weakened voters' faith in its
system. Allowing this audit provides another layer of transparency and citizen engagement,"
he told The Epoch Times in an email.
However, Democrat Fulton County Commission Chairman Robb Pitts criticized the attempt to
examine the ballots.
"It is outrageous that Fulton County continues to be a target of those who cannot accept
the results from last year's election," he told news outlets in a statement.
A newly-obtained video shows United States Capitol Police officers speaking with several January 6 protestors including Jacob
Chansley, the so-called "Q shaman"" inside the Capitol that afternoon.
One officer, identified in the video and confirmed by charging documents as Officer Keith Robishaw, appears to tell Chansely's
group they won't stop them from entering the building.
" We're not against . . . you need to show us . . . no attacking, no assault,
remain calm ," Robishaw warns. Chansley and another protestor instruct the crowd to act peacefully. " This has to be peaceful, "
Chansley yelled. "We have the right to peacefully assemble."
The video directly contradicts what government prosecutors allege in a
complaint filed January
8 against Chansley: "Robishaw and other officers calmed the protestors somewhat and directed them to leave the area from the same
way they had entered. Chansley approached Officer Robishaw and screamed, among other things, that this was their house, and that
they were there to take the Capitol, and to get Congressional leaders."
Chansley later is seen
entering the Senate chambers with a police officer behind him; he led several protesters in prayer and sat in Vice President
Mike Pence's chair . (The man in the yellow sweatshirt is William Watson, a
drug
dealer out on bond. He was arrested in January.)
Chansley is not charged with assaulting an officer; he faces several counts for trespassing and disorderly conduct. He has been
incarcerated since January, denied bail awaiting trial. He has no criminal record.
American Greatness obtained the video from RMG News. The 44-second clip is reportedly part of a much longer video that has yet
to be released.
One can't blame everything on Israel. Yes, it is part of five eyes, more like SIX
eyes.
Biden (JB) is building a coalition to challenge China. JB's administration wants to
neutralize Russia. Nord Stream 2 is an element of contention and by making a concession JB is
making Germany and Russia happy. Agree, that its completion will be a "huge geopolitical win
for Putin". Let's see when Nord Stream 2 becomes fully operational. Time will tell.
Russia's main focus is De-Dollarization, stability in Russia and in its neighborhood.
China's announcement about Bitcoin led to it dropping by 30%. What will China, Russia,
Turkey and Iran announcement about the U$A dollar do to its value and the market? When will
China become the #1 ECONOMY?
The US is now the largest provider of LNG, so there is relatively little more financial
advantage to be gained from a direct confrontation with Germany or Russia. Political maybe,
but the dedollarisation is starting to take hold. (Aside; even Israel depends on the strength
of the dollar to continue, like musical chairs, when the music stops there will be
precious few chairs left ). The Gas/Oil lobbies in the US who are behind the sanctions
may have some other trick up their sleeve, but the deflation of Zelensky in Ukraine, and the
opening up of a steal-fest of Ukrainian assets might compensate.
***
Note that the West has closed Syrian Embassies so as to stop Syrians voting for Assad. They
steal it's oil, and Syria is still next to Israel and doing relatively well in spite of
tanker bombings, and missiles. It is also possible that, as you say, there is a price for
non-interference in Israel itself.
(nytimes.com)
371 Posted by msmash on Monday May 24, 2021 @04:00PM from the how-about-that dept. Florida
on Monday became the first state to regulate how companies like Facebook, YouTube and Twitter
moderate
speech online , by imposing fines on social media companies that permanently bar political
candidates in the state. From a report:
The law, signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, is a direct response to Facebook's and Twitter's
bans of former President Donald J. Trump in January. In addition to the fines for barring
candidates, it makes it illegal to prevent some news outlets from posting to their platforms
in response to the contents of their stories. Mr. DeSantis said signing the bill meant that
Floridians would be "guaranteed protection against the Silicon Valley elites."
"If Big Tech censors enforce rules inconsistently, to discriminate in favor of the
dominant Silicon Valley ideology, they will now be held accountable," he said in a statement.
The bill is part of a broader push among conservative state legislatures to crack down on the
ability of tech companies to manage posts on their platforms. The political efforts took off
after Mr. Trump was barred after the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Lawmakers around the
country have echoed Mr. Trump's accusations that the companies are biased against
conservative personalities and publications, even though those accounts often thrive online.
More than a hundred bills targeting the companies' moderation practices have been filed
nationwide this year, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Many of the
bills have died, but a proposal is still being debated in Texas.
"... John Earle Sullivan of Provo, Utah, was also hit with additional criminal charges and now faces a total of eight criminal counts, including weapons charges , according to Reuters . Sullivan is one of more than 440 people charged in connection with the Jan. 6 'insurrection' in which Trump supporters who rejected the outcome of the 2020 US election stormed the Capitol with the full support of several Capitol Police officers - some of whom took selfies with the protesters. ..."
"... During one conversation with others while inside, Sullivan said, "We gotta get this [expletive] burned." At other times, he said, among other things, "it's our house [expletive]" and "we are getting this [expletive]." ..."
"... Sullivan told U.S. Capitol Police officers to stand down so that they wouldn't get hurt, according to the court filing ( pdf ). He joined the crowd trying to open doors to another part of the Capitol, telling people "Hey guys, I have a knife" and asking them to let him get to the front. He did not make it to the doors. He later tried to get the officers guarding the Speaker's Lobby to go home, telling them: "Bro, I've seen people out there get hurt." ..."
"... Following the riot Sullivan appeared on several mainstream television networks CNN and MSNBC, which paid him for the footage. ..."
US authorities have seized approximately $90,000 from a far-left BLM organizer who 'stormed the capitol' right alongside Trump
supporters and sold footage he took of US Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt being shot dead by a Capitol Police Officer.
John Earle Sullivan of Provo, Utah, was also hit with additional criminal charges and now faces a total of eight criminal
counts, including weapons charges , according to
Reuters
. Sullivan is one of more than 440 people charged in connection with the Jan. 6 'insurrection' in which Trump supporters who
rejected the outcome of the 2020 US election stormed the Capitol with the full support of several Capitol Police officers - some
of whom took selfies with the protesters.
After breaking into the Capitol through an open window, Sullivan was heard encouraging protesters to climb a wall to gain entrance
.
During one conversation with others while inside, Sullivan said, "We gotta get this [expletive] burned." At other times, he
said, among other things, "it's our house [expletive]" and "we are getting this [expletive]."
Sullivan told U.S. Capitol Police officers to stand down so that they wouldn't get hurt, according to the court filing (
pdf ). He joined the crowd trying to open doors
to another part of the Capitol, telling people "Hey guys, I have a knife" and asking them to let him get to the front. He did not
make it to the doors. He later tried to get the officers guarding the Speaker's Lobby to go home, telling them: "Bro, I've seen people
out there get hurt."
Following the riot Sullivan appeared on several mainstream television networks CNN and MSNBC, which paid him for the footage.
Auditors for a 2020 election investigation being carried out in Windham, New Hampshire, are
saying that some of their latest findings are "large enough to account for discrepancies" in
the election results.
Auditors said they found "experimental confirmation that if the contest is undervoted, a
fold through a vote target can create a vote."
"Something we strongly suspect at this juncture, based on various evidence, is that in
some cases, fold lines are being interpreted by the scanners as valid votes," Mark Lindeman,
part of the audit team,
told WMUR .
Harri Hursti, another auditor, said on Twitter that testing proved folded ballots were
misinterpreted by machines.
"Test decks proved that foldings across a vote targets is misinterpreted as additional
phantom votes or subtracts votes due to false overvotes," he wrote in a post.
Auditors finished the hand recount on May 21. The audit began
on May 11.
AccuVote didn't respond to a request for comment about the audit authorization by the Epoch
Times. The AccuVote machines' intellectual property are owned by Dominion Voting Systems.
Windham's four state representative seats were all won by Republicans on Election Night. The
presidential election was not an item for this audit.
Democrat candidate Kristi St. Laurent, who lost by a narrow margin of 24 votes, requested an
audit ( pdf ) claiming
that the machines were improperly programmed, and that double voting was involved.
As a result, New Hampshire's Republican Gov. Chris Sununu, signed a bill last month that gave authorization
for forensic analysis and a comprehensive recount of the 2020 election votes in Windham related
to optical scanning AccuVote machines.
An automatic recount was done, resulting in St. Laurent losing 99 more votes after a hand
recount. Meanwhile, four Republicans gained about 300 votes each.
The other three Democrats gained between 18 and 28 votes.
The audit team said that more issues could be involved besides folded ballots being
misinterpreted.
"The fold effect is large enough to account for discrepancies, but might not be all that's
going on," the team said on Twitter on May 22.
"75 folded ballots voted straight Republican. Only 48 votes recorded for them. Folds
generated overvotes. This is machine used on Election Day [for] most absentee ballots."
Another machine was found to have "an even more dramatic problem" by the auditors, who said
that only 28 percent of the votes for Republican candidates were counted.
"The work is not completed yet. While the folding seems to be a strong contributor it
clearly is not the only factor," Hursti said on Sunday.
"For example: We have observed vastly different error rates on two machines processing the
same ballots. Work continues."
One of the things that makes Wi-Fi work is its ability to break big chunks of
data into smaller chunks and combine smaller chunks into bigger chunks, depending on the needs of the network at any given
moment. These mundane network plumbing features, it turns out, have been harboring vulnerabilities that can be exploited to send
users to malicious websites or exploit or tamper with network-connected devices, newly published research shows.
In all, researcher Mathy Vanhoef found a dozen vulnerabilities, either in the
Wi-Fi specification or in the way the specification has been implemented in huge numbers of devices. Vanhoef has dubbed the
vulnerabilities
FragAttacks
,
short for fragmentation and aggregation attacks, because they all involve frame fragmentation or frame aggregation. Broadly
speaking, they allow people within radio range to inject frames of their choice into networks protected by WPA-based encryption.
Bad news
FURTHER READING
Serious flaw in WPA2 protocol lets attackers intercept passwords and much more
Assessing the impact of the vulnerabilities isn't straightforward. FragAttacks allow data to be injected into Wi-Fi traffic, but
they don't make it possible to exfiltrate anything out. That means FragAttacks can't be used to read passwords or other sensitive
information the way a previous Wi-Fi attack of Vanhoef, called
Krack
,
did. But it turns out that the vulnerabilities -- some that have been part of Wi-Fi since its release in 1997 -- can be exploited to
inflict other kinds of damage, particularly if paired with other types of hacks.
"It's never good to have someone able to drop packets into your network or target your devices on the network," Mike Kershaw, a
Wi-Fi security expert and developer of the open source Kismet wireless sniffer and IDS, wrote in an email. "In some regards,
these are no worse than using an unencrypted access point at a coffee shop -- someone can do the same to you there, trivially -- but
because they can happen on networks you'd otherwise think are secure and might have configured as a trusted network, it's
certainly bad news."
He added: "Overall, I think they give someone who was already targeting an
attack against an individual or company a foothold they wouldn't have had before, which is definitely impactful, but probably
don't pose as huge a risk as drive-by attacks to the average person."
While the flaws were disclosed last week in an industry-wide effort nine months
in the making, it remains unclear in many cases which devices were vulnerable to which vulnerabilities and which vulnerabilities,
if any, have received security updates. It's almost a certainty that many Wi-Fi-enabled devices will never be fixed.
Rogue DNS injection
One of the most severe vulnerabilities in the FragAttacks suite resides in the
Wi-Fi specification itself. Tracked as CVE-2020-24588, the flaw can be exploited in a way that forces Wi-Fi devices to use a
rogue DNS server, which in turn can deliver users to malicious websites rather than the ones they intended. From there, hackers
can read and modify any unencrypted traffic. Rogue DNS servers also allow hackers to perform
DNS
rebinding attacks
, in which malicious websites manipulate a browser to attack other devices connected to the same network.
The rogue DNS server is introduced when an attacker injects an
ICMPv6
Router Advertisement
into Wi-Fi traffic. Routers typically issue these announcements so other devices on the network can
locate them. The injected advertisement instructs all devices to use a DNS specified by the attacker for lookups of both IPv6 and
IPv4 addresses.
In an email, Vanhoef explained, saying, "The IPv6 router advertisement is put
in the payload (i.e. data portion) of the TCP packet. This data is by default passed on to the application that created the TCP
connection. In the demo, that would be the browser, which is expecting an image. This means that by default, the client won't
process the IPv6 router advertisement but instead process the TCP payload as application data."
Vanhoef said that it's possible to perform the attack without user interaction
when the target's access point is vulnerable to
CVE-2021-26139
,
one of the 12 vulnerabilities that make up the FragAttacks package. The security flaw stems from a kernel flaw in NetBSD 7.1 that
causes Wi-Fi access points to forward
Extensible
Authentication Protocol (AP) over LAN
frames to other devices even when the sender has not yet authenticated to the AP.
It's safe to skip ahead, but for those curious about the specific software bug
and the reason the video demo uses a malicious image, Vanhoef explained:
To make the victim process the TCP payload (i.e. data portion) as a separate
packet, the aggregation design flaw in Wi-Fi is abused. That is, the attacker intercepts the malicious TCP packet at the Wi-Fi
layer and sets the "is aggregated" flag in the Wi-Fi header. As a result, the receiver will split the Wi-Fi frame into two
network packets. The first network packet contains part of the original TCP header and is discarded. The second packet
corresponds with the TCP payload, which we made sure will now correspond to the ICMPv6 packet, and as a result, the ICMPv6
router advertisement is now processed by the victim as a separate packet. So proximity to the victim is required to set the
"is aggregated" Wi-Fi flag so that the malicious TCP packet will be split into two by the receiver.
The design flaw is that an adversary can change/set the "is aggregated" flag
without the receiver noticing this. This flag should have been authenticated so that a receiver can detect if it has been
modified.
It's possible to perform the attack without user interaction when the
access point is vulnerable to CVE-2020-26139. Out of four tested home routers, two of them had this vulnerability. It seems
that most Linux-based routers are affected by this vulnerability. The research paper discusses in more detail how this
works -- essentially, instead of including the ICMPV6 router advertisement in a malicious TCP packet, it can then be included in
an unencrypted handshake message (which the AP will then forward to the client after which the adversary can again set the "is
aggregated" flag etc).
Punching a hole in
the firewall
Four of the 12 vulnerabilities that make up the FragAttacks are implementation
flaws, meaning they stem from bugs that software developers introduced when writing code based on the Wi-Fi specification. An
attacker can exploit them against access points to bypass a key security benefit they provide.
Besides allowing multiple devices to share a single Internet connection,
routers prevent incoming traffic from reaching connected devices unless the devices have requested it. This firewall works by
using network address translation, or NAT, which maps private IP addresses that the AP assigns each device on the local network
to a single IP address that the AP uses to send data over the Internet.
The result is that routers forward data to connected devices only when they
have previously requested it from a website, email server, or other machine on the Internet. When one of those machines tries to
send unsolicited data to a device behind the router, the router automatically discards it. This arrangement
isn't
perfect
, but it does provide a vital defense that protects billions of devices.
Vanhoef figured out how to exploit the four vulnerabilities in a way that
allows an attacker to, as he put it, "punch a hole through a router's firewall." With the ability to connect directly to devices
behind a firewall, an Internet attacker can then send them malicious code or commands.
In one demo in the video, Vanhoef exploits the vulnerabilities to control an
Internet-of-things device, specifically to remotely turn on and off a smart power socket. Normally, NAT would prevent a device
outside the network from interacting with the socket unless the socket had first initiated a connection. The implementation
exploits remove this barrier.
FURTHER READING
Microsoft practically begs Windows users to fix wormable BlueKeep flaw
In a separate demo, Vanhoef shows how the vulnerabilities allow a device on the Internet to initiate a connection with a computer
running Windows 7, an operating system that stopped receiving security updates years ago. The researcher used that ability to
gain complete control over the PC by sending it malicious code that exploited a
critical
vulnerability called BlueKeep
.
"That means that when an access point is
vulnerable, it becomes easy to attack clients!" Vanhoef wrote. "So we're abusing the Wi-Fi implementation flaws in an
access
point
as a first step in order to subsequently attack (outdated)
clients
."
Getting your fix
Despite Vanhoef spending nine months coordinating patches with more than a
dozen hardware and software makers, it's not easy to figure out which devices or software are vulnerable to which
vulnerabilities, and of those vulnerable products, which ones have received fixes.
This page
provides the status for products from several companies. A more comprehensive list of known advisories is
here
.
Other advisories are available individually from their respective vendors. The vulnerabilities to look for are:
Design flaws:
CVE-2020-24588
: aggregation attack (accepting non-SPP A-MSDU frames)
CVE-2020-24587
: mixed key attack (reassembling fragments encrypted under different keys)
CVE-2020-24586
: fragment cache attack (not clearing fragments from memory when (re)connecting to a network)
Implementation
vulnerabilities allowing the injection of plaintext frames:
CVE-2020-26145
: Accepting plaintext broadcast fragments as full frames (in an encrypted network)
CVE-2020-26144
: Accepting plaintext A-MSDU frames that start with an RFC1042 header with EtherType EAPOL (in an encrypted
network)
CVE-2020-26140
: Accepting plaintext data frames in a protected network
CVE-2020-26143
: Accepting fragmented plaintext data frames in a protected network
Other implementation
flaws:
CVE-2020-26139
: Forwarding EAPOL frames even though the sender is not yet authenticated (should only affect APs)
CVE-2020-26146
: Reassembling encrypted fragments with non-consecutive packet numbers
CVE-2020-26147
: Reassembling mixed encrypted/plaintext fragments
CVE-2020-26142
: Processing fragmented frames as full frames
CVE-2020-26141
: Not verifying the TKIP MIC of fragmented frames
The most effective way to mitigate the threat posed by FragAttacks is to
install all available updates that fix the vulnerabilities. Users will have to do this on each vulnerable computer, router, or
other Internet-of-things device. It's likely that a huge number of affected devices will never receive a patch.
The next-best mitigation is to ensure that websites are always using HTTPS
connections. That's because the encryption HTTPS provides greatly reduces the damage that can be done when a malicious DNS server
directs a victim to a fake website.
Sites that use HTTP Strict Transport Security will always use this protection,
but Vanhoef said that only about 20 percent of the web does this. Browser extensions like
HTTPS
everywhere
were already a good idea, and the mitigation they provide against FragAttacks makes them even more worthwhile.
As noted earlier, FragAttacks aren't likely to be exploited against the vast
majority of Wi-Fi users, since the exploits require a high degree of skill as well as proximity -- meaning within 100 feet to a
half-mile, depending on the equipment used -- to the target. The vulnerabilities pose a higher threat to networks used by high-value
targets such as retail chains, embassies, or corporate networks where security is key, and then most likely only in concert with
other exploits.
When updates become available, by all means install them, but unless you're in
this latter group, remember that drive-by downloads and other more mundane types of attacks will probably pose a bigger threat.
Promoted Comments
When I'm networking I always assume the network I'm connected to is completely compromised, so all my devices use these things
and are properly firewalled in which case these attacks are pretty much worthless.
While only new versions of Android support DoT out of the box on the system level, Google has recently added the support for
DoH to Chrome, so in case your device is running an older version of Android you might want to enable DoH in Chrome to feel
safe.
And as for Firefox it's had the support for DoH for years. I've gone as far as to set network.trr.mode to 2 in about:config to
be extra safe. 3 is even better:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Trusted_Recursive_Resolver
178 posts | register
They have a lot of work to do. There is a suspicion among cynics like myself that GOP
bossmen conspired with DNC to rig 2020 for the opposition.
Moribund Mitch was congratulating Catatonic Joe while the election was still contested and
GA runoff polls were still open. Mike Pence folded up like a ten dollar suitcase.
SurfingUSA 7 hours ago remove link
"Suspicion" ????
Those facts are locked down. See the following GOP champions of Domino Ion Voting with
documented roles in getting the equipment and obstructing investigations:
Note Domino Ion election management is to an extent a front for the CCP.
chunga 7 hours ago
The recount thing in AZ is a stunt as far as I'm concerned. Nobody ever bothered to
question suitcase girl. It is inexplicable.
YuriTheClown 7 hours ago
Don't do the China thing. That is the Republican version of Russia! Russia! Russia!
While I am sure China spreads the cheese around we all know it's the Giewash Mob banking
cartel that is firmly in control. The Cartel can shut off Chinese Cheese in a heart beat when
desired. They just like using other people's money.
19331510 3 hours ago
Main street does not want perpetual wars, why do you think Trump was elected for a second
time?
Miniminer1 8 hours ago
CNN and the msm will keep putting her on TV like she's important and telling their few
viewers she might be president and will go after evil trump and thereby keeping the
brainwashing alive . Keep fighting for justice president trump!!!
No_Pretzel_Logic 7 hours ago
CIA News Network is 100% Deep State operated.
I can flip to that channel anytime of day and within 120 seconds I am pointing at the TV
and saying, "Liars!"
It is almost completely Pravda-programming and remains a real threat to this country. Same
with MSDNC.
YuriTheClown 7 hours ago
You watch TV????
aegis551 8 hours ago
Cheneys is a neocons and a globalist. Hopefully the good people of Wyoming can see that
and kick this POS to the curb.
Paul Bunyan 8 hours ago
Darth Cheney is not pleased the GOP has discredited his daughter. I am sure he and the
Bushes will be doing everything they can to keep Trump from running in '24.
SPACE-CADET 8 hours ago
Little Bush killed 10,000 americans and over 1 million Iraq.
He retired to Texas with a cushy pension.
Paul Bunyan 8 hours ago (Edited)
Never mind the pension. The Bushes are American royalty and British royals before it. His
mother Barbara is a Pierce, as in the former POTUS and NYC banking dynasty. Everyone knows
CIA asset George Sr. Then there is patriarch Prescott who was a Senator, a banker with the
Harrimans ( THE bank that funneled Nazi money through Wall Street) and a Scull and bonesman
(as was GHWB and GWB). Then there is Uncle Bert Walker, where both names Herbert and Walker
come from. This man traces both names back to British royalty, where both the Herberts and
Walkers ruled on the British courts for hundreds of years. So for pensions, these families
have power and wealth that can not be imagined.
YuriTheClown 7 hours ago
Nah. As per Eustace Mullins ( a national treasure his recordings )
Bushes served Harrimans
Harrimans served Rothschilds
Bushes are high functionaries
arby63 7 hours ago
They all hated Trump because he wasn't in the club. This scum Cheney is a name I've had to
endure for 40 years.
Thats why they hated Trump. He wasn't one of them.
Dominion said in a statement to news outlets on Thursday that it would comply with the
audit, but Cyber Ninjas, the firm hired by the Arizona Senate to conduct it along with three
other companies, is not accredited by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
" Releasing Dominion's intellectual property to an unaccredited, biased, and plainly
unreliable actor such as Cyber Ninjas would be reckless, causing irreparable damage to the
commercial interests of the company and the election security interests of the country ,"
Dominion said. "No company should be compelled to participate in such an irresponsible
act."
Cyber Ninjas did not respond to a request for comment.
Maricopa County officials previously said that they did not have passwords to access
administrative functions on Dominion Voting Systems machines that were used to scan ballots
during the election, according to the Senate's audit liaison, former Republican Secretary of
State Ken Bennett.
"They've told us that they don't have that second password, or that they've given us all the
passwords they have," Bennett told One America News at the site of the audit in Phoenix last
week.
Both routers or router images and access to election machines were part of the materials the
state Senate subpoenaed late last year. A judge in February ruled that the subpoenas were valid
and should be obeyed.
Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, a Republican,
recently threatened to subpoena county officials if they didn't stop their noncompliance
with the subpoenas, but
backed off the threat in a letter on May 12.
Instead, she asked Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Chairman Jack Sellers, also a
Republican, to cooperate voluntarily by attending an upcoming meeting at the state Capitol to
go over the audit issues.
Fann said auditors have found discrepancies in the ballot count, including one batch that
was supposed to be 200 but only numbered 165. She also said the audit teams found an entire
database directory from an election machine had been deleted, and that the main database for
the election management system software was not located anywhere on the machine, suggesting
that the main database for all data related to the 2020 election had been removed.
Sellers on Thursday indicated he would not attend the meeting and disputed the
allegations.
Deleting files off the server "would be a crime -- and it is not true," he said.
"After reviewing the letter with County election and IT experts, I can say that the
allegations are false and ill-informed. Moreover, the claim that our employees deleted election
files and destroyed evidence is outrageous, completely baseless, and beneath the dignity of the
Arizona Senate," he added, calling for an immediate retraction of statements senators and their
liaison team made on social media and to the press.
The Board of Supervisors, which held a closed-door emergency meeting on Friday, plans on
holding a public meeting on Monday to address the matter.
Fann, an Arizona Senate Republican Caucus spokeswoman, and the liaison team did not
immediately respond to requests for comment.
Auditors, meanwhile, began packing up on Thursday evening because the audit will take a
break due to scheduling conflicts.
The audit has been taking place at the Veterans Memorial Coliseum on the state fairgrounds
in Phoenix. High school graduations are scheduled to take place at the building beginning May
15.
Hand counting stopped at 7 p.m. on Thursday and workers began collapsing tables and
preparing to move ballots to another location.
About 500,000 of the nearly 2.1 million ballots cast in Maricopa County in the 2020 election
have been counted in the audit, according to Bennett.
The Arizona Senate signed an extension to their original agreement that allows auditors to
store materials in the Wesley Bolin Building, which is also on the state fairgrounds, from May
12 to May 23.
The approximately 19,000-square foot building has a large open floor plan and two large
roll-up doors, according to the Arizona State Fair website.
"Due to temperatures during the summer months, this building is not recommended for use
between May through September," the site states.
Bennett told The Epoch Times in a previous interview that the materials will be secure and
that the site at which they'll be stored can be tracked online via 24-hour streaming, just like
the audit itself.
" There's no deadline for the audit ," Bennett said. " The goal is not speed; the goal is
accuracy and completeness. "
The audit teams can resume occupancy of the coliseum on May 23 and use it until June 30,
according to a copy of the extended agreement obtained
by The Epoch Times .
The original scope of work document from Cyber Ninjas said reviewing voter registration and
votes case would take approximately 20 days and that work would be conducted remotely. The vote
counting phase would take about 20 more days, it said, while the electronic voting system phase
would take some 35 days.
But all three of those phases could be carried out simultaneously, according to the firm. An
additional week was said to be required after completing everything else to finalize
reporting.
How would Liz Cheney, Kristina Peterson (writer of this column) or anyone else ( including
William Barr) know whether Trump is correct or not.? The obfuscation created by governors,
legislatures and judges made the process inscrutable. I personally believe it more likely
than not that Trump is correct.
The repetitive use of the term of "baseless" does not make it so. No one can possibly ever
know. The Supreme Court had the opportunity to examine it. Justices Thomas and Alito were
correct, the court should have taken the Texas case. Cheney obviously hates Trump. That's
what motivates her -- not some higher cause.
How would Liz Cheney, Kristina Peterson (writer of this column) or anyone else ( including
William Barr) know whether Trump is correct or not.? The obfuscation created by governors,
legislatures and judges made the process inscrutable. I personally believe it more likely
than not that Trump is correct.
The repetitive use of the term of "baseless" does not make it so. No one can possibly
ever know. The Supreme Court had the opportunity to examine it. Justices Thomas and Alito
were correct, the court should have taken the Texas case. Cheney obviously hates Trump.
That's what motivates her -- not some higher cause.
How would Liz Cheney, Kristina Peterson (writer of this column) or anyone else (
including William Barr) know whether Trump is correct or not.? The obfuscation created
by governors, legislatures and judges made the process inscrutable. I personally
believe it more likely than not that Trump is correct.
The repetitive use of the term of "baseless" does not make it so. No one can
possibly ever know. The Supreme Court had the opportunity to examine it. Justices
Thomas and Alito were correct, the court should have taken the Texas case. Cheney
obviously hates Trump. That's what motivates her -- not some higher cause.
Update (1400ET) : Wow, something must be really worrying Democrats?
There appears to be a full court press effort to delay and defer any and every effort to
audit Maricopa County's election results. The Biden justice department added to pressure from
Arizona's chief elections officer (a Democrat) and the Arizona Democratic Party, and now,
Daniel Payne at JustTheNews.com reports that officials in Arizona's Maricopa County are
withholding materials subpoenaed by the state legislature as part of its audit of the county's
2020 election , claiming that surrendering them would constitute a security risk for both law
enforcement and federal agencies.
A Monday letter
sent from the Maricopa County Attorney's Office to Ken Bennett, the former Arizona secretary of
state and the liaison between the state Senate and the auditors, said the county had elected
not to turn over "several routers" requested by the legislature due to an alleged "significant
security risk to law enforcement data utilized by the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office as well
as numerous federal agencies."
Given that President Biden is the most popular president ever and we know from the
mainstream media that there was no, none, zip, nada, election fraud anywhere in America, why
are Democrats so aggressively interfering in the process of auditing the county's election?
* * *
Update (1300ET): Shortly after Arizona's top elections officer raised concerns about the
Maricopa County election audit process, the Biden Department of Justice piled on, expressing
concern about ballot security and potential voter intimidation.
As
AP reports, in a letter to GOP Senate President Karen Fann, the head of the Justice
Department's Civil Rights Division said the Senate's farming out of 2.1 million ballots from
the state's most populous county to a contractor may run afoul of federal law requiring ballots
to remain in the control of elections officials for 22 months.
And Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Pamela S. Karlan said that the Senate
contractor's plans to directly contact voters could amount to illegal voter intimidation.
"Past experience with similar investigative efforts around the country has raised concerns
that they can be directed at minority voters, which potentially can implicate the
anti-intimidation prohibitions of the Voting Rights Act," Karlan wrote.
"Such investigative efforts can have a significant intimidating effect on qualified voters
that can deter them from seeking to vote in the future."
So, Democrats play the race-card again?
"We are very concerned that the auditors are engaged in ongoing and imminent violations of
federal voting and election laws," said the letter sent by the Brennan Center for Justice,
the Leadership Conference and Protect Democracy.
Why are they so worried? They already told America there was no fraud?
In a letter ( pdf ) to former
Secretary of State Ken Bennett, a Republican who is the state Senate's liaison for the audit,
Hobbs outlined 13 points of concern over how the audit is being run. This included seven points
of concern over counting procedures that the state Senate and audit contractor Cyber Ninjas
disclosed, as well as six points of concern over what her observers saw at the audit site.
Under terms of a
lawsuit settlement filed on Wednesday, defendants Bennett, Arizona Senate President Karen
Fann, and the lead auditor, Florida-based Cyber Ninjas have 48 hours to respond to Hobbs'
concerns. If the concerns are not addressed, Hobbs could take them back to court for breach of
contract.
The audit began on April 23 and continues at Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix,
a venue the auditors have booked and secured until May 14.
Hobbs, a Democrat, alleged that the procedures governing the audit do not ensure accuracy,
security, and transparency.
"I'm not sure what compelled you to oversee this audit, but I'd like to assume you took
this role with the best of intentions," she told Bennett in the letter.
"It is those intentions I appeal to now: either do it right, or don't do it at all."
The Arizona Democratic Party
filed a last-minute lawsuit against state Senate leadership to try to stop the audit from
going ahead but their bid to immediately halt it was rebuffed by a judge. The settlement means
the case has concluded.
"The settlement in ADP v Fann requires the Senate to have procedures to protect our
ballots, election equipment, and data. Today, I put the Senate on notice that security
shortfalls remain and must be addressed under the agreement," Hobbs said in a statement.
The official Twitter account for the audit, run by Bennet's team, said late on Wednesday
that Hobbs "continues to make baseless claimes [sic] about this forensic audit but has never
led an election audit in her entire career."
The message declared, "The audit continues!"
The group furthermore encouraged Twitter users to retweet if they think audits are a state
right. Another statement released later on Wednesday reads:
"Democrat [Secretary of State Katie Hobbs] who does not support election audits or
transparency now wants the Federal Government to get involved in the Arizona Senate forensic
audit. Arizona has the authority to conduct this audit without interference from the
Feds!"
Bennett did not immediately respond to a request for comment over the contents of Hobbs'
letter.
He told the
Arizona Capitol Times late Wednesday of Hobbs' concerns, "I think that most of the things
in her letter are completely unfounded . And the ones that have a little bit of legitimacy can
be dealt with pretty easily."
Bennett did not elaborate as to what concerns would fall into the latter category.
Real-time camera footage of Maricopa County's large-scale audit of the 2020 election,
Maricopa County, Ariz. (Screenshot/The Epoch Times)
Among the seven concerns based on the disclosed procedures, Hobbs alleged that there were
"no procedures for hiring qualified, unbiased counters." She noted that former State
Representative Anthony Kern, a Republican, has been among the people counting the ballots in
the audit.
Kern's name is listed on the ballot "not only as a candidate for State Representative but as
a Presidential Elector -- the exact race for which he is counting," Hobbs wrote, adding, "While
these facts would be disqualifying in any professional recount or audit, unfortunately, there
are additional reasons why Mr. Kern is not trustworthy to fulfill this role."
Hobbs in her letter also took aim at a number of procedures that she said "appear better
suited for chasing conspiracy theories than as a part of a professional audit," which included
using UV lights to search for watermarks, measuring the thickness of ballots, searching for
folds in ballots, and looking at ballots under a microscope.
She said these measures are "completely unnecessary steps if the goal of the audit is to
validate the election results."
She also questioned how tally sheets from ballot counters would be added up, and noted that
her office had "received no real explanation" over the matter "other than that an accounting
firm will handle it later."
"This is not transparency. Further, it appears that a single person enters the totals from
the tally sheets into an electronic spreadsheet, leaving wide open the opportunity for error,
inadvertent or otherwise," she wrote. "At minimum, a bipartisan team of at least two
individuals should aggregate the tally sheets or otherwise confirm that data is entered
accurately for aggregation."
In addition to concerns over the disclosed procedures, Hobbs alleged in her letter that
observers from her office have seen a number of problems, which include inadequate physical
security of ballots, unattended computers at the forensic analysis tables, constantly changing
rules in the audit procedures since the beginning of the audit, and "frequent violations" of
the procedures that do exist.
The Arizona Republican-led Senate previously
hired four out-of-state firms to carry out the audit, which are Wake Technology Services,
CyFIR, Digital Discovery, and Cyber Ninjas.
The state Senate has said that the "
broad and detailed " audit "will validate every area of the voting process" and includes,
but is not limited to, scanning all the ballots, a full hand recount, auditing the voter
registration and votes cast, the vote counts, and the electronic voting system. This includes
examining some 2.1 million ballots, as well as voting equipment that includes 385
tabulators.
Bennett
told The Epoch Times on Monday that the audit may last longer than originally planned. An
analysis of the equipment used in the 2020 election was completed over the weekend, but
reviewing other materials will need more time, he said.
President Joe Biden was the first Democratic presidential nominee to win Maricopa County in
decades.
*** Please Note: Russia is not weak considering that it has the ability to nuke America in
to ashes within 30 minutes, or any other bunch of idiots that chooses to step over her red
lines. Okay the US has 350 million people compared to 150 million Russians, but the US is
irrevocably divided and Russia is fully united even the Muslim minority is united with the
State in Russia. A divided house can not stand no man can serve two masters. On top of that
the US has no moral values whereas Russia is a Christian country where marriage is between a
man and a woman, by State law. Biden can fly all the queer flags he likes but he still leads
a divided nation with a corrupt State comprised of dual passport holders, amoral materialists
and deluded mentally challenged idiots like Waters and Pelosi.
"... Bernie Sanders in 2016, the self-described democratic socialist "showed little interest or knowledge about US-Russia relations and the attendant dangers of a new cold war." Instead, Sanders was ultimately content to mimic the juvenile and Manichean "democracies versus authoritarians" model of international relations. ..."
"... in the Obama era, as mediocre academics like Celeste Wallander were given positions on the National Security Council, and an ideologue like Michael McFaul was bizarrely appointed as ambassador. ..."
"... Under Biden – who caved to pressure from the foreign policy blob to not appoint Rojansky – the advisers who are in place or in line, including Jake Sullivan , Antony Blinken , Madeleine Albright/Hillary Clinton adviser Wendy Sherman, the German Marshall Fund's Karen Donfried , and State Department nominee Victoria Nuland represent more of the same dangerous ineptitude and strident thinking. Many of these advisers, like their predecessors, have little on-the-ground experience with contemporary Russia. ..."
"... Neoconservative ideologue Nuland, of course, is a slightly different case in that she has put her boots on the ground in the region. Unfortunately, that experience includes facilitating the dangerously divisive 2014 coup in Ukraine, without which Crimea would still be in Ukraine and the Donbass would be at peace. Competent officials would have warned Obama and Biden that the Maidan would lead to consequences like these. ..."
"... importantly, this 'perceived enemy' and its corresponding narrative sells... it enriches the military complexes, CIA etc. Even if it sounded unbelievable and outrageous, they will still be regurgitated and at best, given a new guised repackaging ..."
"... the author assumes that the mistakes made by advisors to Obama and others were because of incompetence, when in fact it should be seriously considered they were actually quite deliberate and planned ..."
"... the job was NOT to deliver facts to the public; the job was to tell the public how to think and what to believe; ie. anti-Russia propaganda. ..."
The rejection
of Matthew Rojansky's candidacy as a Russia adviser to Joe Biden represents an escalation, and
not a departure, from a pervasive bipartisan American pattern of dangerous ignorance about
Russia in the post-Soviet era.
It was reported last week that Joe Biden's government would not be hiring Rojansky, of the
Kennan Institute think tank, to help form policy towards Russia. Though the analyst is known as
a moderate realist regarding Russia issues – in other words, he is not a virulent
anti-Moscow ideologue – he was considered too controversial to be allowed a hearing
during White House deliberations on policy regarding the world's largest country.
Rojansky's sin? Unlike many of the current crop of foreign policy officials, he actually has
some expertise and experience on the subject.
While the scholar's fate may be a glaring and extreme
example of an anti-Russia mindset in Washington that is counterproductive, it represents
only a new low, and not a change from a pervasive bipartisan pattern in the post-Soviet
era.
Those who aspire to, or attain, the most powerful executive position in the United States
have shown a disturbingly willful ignorance of Russia. I learned from a former State Department
official that, in response to a renowned Russia expert attempting to brief presidential
candidate Bernie Sanders in 2016, the self-described democratic socialist "showed little
interest or knowledge about US-Russia relations and the attendant dangers of a new cold
war." Instead, Sanders was ultimately content
to mimic the juvenile and Manichean "democracies versus authoritarians" model of
international relations.
Similarly, an American business executive told me that, during a lunch with him and other
leaders of commerce at the US Embassy in Moscow in 2012, then-Vice President Joe Biden showed
no interest in his interlocutors' suggestions that it was in the US' best interests to partner
with Russia after they offered social, economic, and strategic justifications for their
view.
Biden seemed to see the meeting as an opportunity to lecture on his position rather than to
learn or seek insight on Russia.
Moreover, once a US president is in power, the advisers that are appointed to counsel the
commander in chief about Russia have been less than impressive from the 1990s onward.
Condoleezza Rice served as an expert in the George Bush Senior administration and was
wrong about the impending collapse of the Soviet Union. During her stint as secretary of
state in the second term of the junior Bush administration, her Russian counterparts who spent
significant time with her made the observation
that Rice was "a Soviet expert, and not a Russia expert."
There was little improvement in the Obama era, as mediocre academics like Celeste Wallander were
given positions on the National Security Council, and an ideologue like Michael McFaul was
bizarrely appointed as ambassador.
According to investigative journalist Gareth Porter, advisers to Obama were so utterly
incompetent that those serving in the administration really didn't think Russia had the ability
or inclination to counter Washington's provocative actions in
Syria, and therefore they did not plan for that possibility. This incompetence was also
highlighted by Obama's public comments to the Economist in 2014, in which he claimed that
Russia didn't make anything, immigrants didn't go there, and male life expectancy was 60 years
– three claims that anyone with actual expertise on Russia should have easily known were
false.
In fact, at that point, Russia was the second most popular migration destination in the
world, after America itself, while average lifespans have been converging with those of the US
over the past decade. As for manufacturing, Obama said these words at a time when the US, for
instance, was totally reliant on Russian rockets for access to space, having retired its own
unreliable Space Shuttle fleet. If he had access to a competent adviser on the subject, would
he have made these mistakes?
Under Biden – who caved to pressure from the foreign policy blob to not appoint
Rojansky – the advisers who are in place or in line, including Jake Sullivan , Antony Blinken ,
Madeleine Albright/Hillary Clinton adviser Wendy Sherman, the German Marshall Fund's Karen
Donfried , and State
Department nominee Victoria Nuland represent more of the same dangerous
ineptitude and strident thinking. Many of these advisers, like their predecessors, have little
on-the-ground experience with contemporary Russia.
Neoconservative ideologue Nuland, of course, is a slightly different case in that she has
put her boots on the ground in the region. Unfortunately, that experience includes facilitating
the dangerously divisive 2014 coup in Ukraine, without which Crimea would still be in Ukraine
and the Donbass would be at peace. Competent officials would have warned Obama and Biden that
the Maidan would lead to consequences like these.
It takes a special kind of hubris for the US political class to keep thinking they can get
away with this level of sloppiness in understanding the world's other nuclear superpower
– a country so massive that it straddles two major continents and is the sixth largest
economy in terms of purchasing power parity – without serious consequences. At what point
will God's providence run out?
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
If you like this story, share it with a friend!
Natylie Baldwin is author of "The View from Moscow: Understanding Russia and U.S.-Russia
Relations," available at Amazon. She blogs at http://natyliesbaldwin.com/ .
"Washington has a dangerous & destructive pattern of wilful ignorance on Russia in
post-Soviet era" It is not just wilful ignorance per se. Without a 'perceived enemy', the
narrative for Russia will fall apart. Ditto China, Iran, N Korea et al.
But importantly, this
'perceived enemy' and its corresponding narrative sells... it enriches the military
complexes, CIA etc. Even if it sounded unbelievable and outrageous, they will still be
regurgitated and at best, given a new guised repackaging, but with the antiquated contents
remaining intact.
dotmafia 6 hours ago 6 hours ago
Good article, but, the author assumes that the mistakes made by advisors to Obama and others
were because of incompetence, when in fact it should be seriously considered they were
actually quite deliberate and planned. In the example of Obama's remarks to The Economist,
the job was NOT to deliver facts to the public; the job was to tell the public how to think
and what to believe; ie. anti-Russia propaganda.
Levin High 8 hours ago 8 hours ago
It used to be said that you couldn't be fired for buying IBM, now days in the US you seem to
be hired for blaming Russia.
apothqowejh 9 hours ago 9 hours ago
The US State Department is packed with idiots, political appointees, ideologues and globalist
nut jobs. Their lack of anything remotely like competence is as astonishing as the CIA's full
on embrace of evil.
wowhead1977 4 hours ago 4 hours ago
The cabal in America always want to blame Russia. I'm a American citizen and have no problem
with Russia. These so called sanctions on other countries is a control tactic that most
Americans didn't vote for. This race baiting tactic is from The Fabian Society play book.
Wolf in sheep's clothing is the Fabian Society logo.
We must realize that our Party's most
powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races,
that for centuries have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mold them to the program of the
Communist Party ... In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While enflaming the color
people minority against the Whites, we will instill in the Whites, a guilt complex for the
exploitation of the color people.
We will aid the color people to rise to prominence in every
walk of life, in the professions, and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this
prestige, the color people will be able to intermarry with the Whites, and begin a process
which will deliver America to our cause." ~ Israel Cohen - Fabian Society Founder
" as a condition, the judge insisted that the Dems post a $1 million bond to cover potential
costs incurred as a consequence of the delayed recount. And, by the afternoon, the outlet said,
the state party had indicated it wouldn't do so.
That cleared the way for the recount to go on as planned.
Earlier this week, Senate Republicans exercised a subpoena to move voting equipment and
ballots from county storage to the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum, where they have said a
team will spend a month doing a hand recount and forensic audit.
According to the Post, Senate leaders have said the process is intended only to explore ways
to improve future elections, not to cast doubt on Biden's win by more than 10,000 Arizona votes
over Trump.
But the recount has been slammed by Dems and other critics and voting rights advocates as
lacking proper oversight and having potential to perpetuate baseless claims of an illegitimate
election outcome.
Trump insisted for weeks following the vote that he'd been defeated only because of rampant,
systemic fraud. He filed numerous lawsuits, but they gained no traction ; Biden was
sworn in, as scheduled, on Jan. 20.
Comment: "but they gained no traction" Oh BS! The damned judges and boards would not hear
the evidence! The worst was SCOTUS who would not hear Texas' suit against Pennsylvania in what
was a matter of Original Jurisdiction for SCOTUS, i.e., a dispute between states as sovereign
entities.
The result of this re-count will be interesting. pl
The question is if they're just gonna count the ballots or first verify that the ballot
is valid by comparing signature to voter roll if it is a Mail-in ballot? If the latter what
are the criteria to verify signature compliance? Reply
Looks like they will be using special scanners, ala Jovan Pulitzer's pattern
detection technology, to determine the initial validity of the ballot itself- scanning
for water marks, creases and machine-made markings.
This comes from someone who observed what looked like this sort of equipment was
present on a table, from the in-house surveillance cameras. Not confirmed.
Since the goal is surveying for in inherent voting procedure flaws that would
undermine any election integrity, this would be a reasonable up front physical ballot
evaluation to make.
How can you mail in a ballot that has no creases? Put it in a large envelope is one
way – perfectly valid. Thousands of them – all for one candidate? All with
the exact same down ballot choices?
No watermarks – someone took the money for himself and hired the cheapest
bidder to print up non-water marked ballots and sent them out as "official" – and
there was no double checking?
Machine printed ballots, filled out at home. Handicap accommodations? How many ways
to Sunday can phony ballots be added into the final count. How may ways to Sunday
ballot anommolies can finally be explained.
How to reverse engineer as many possible methods of voting fraud as can be
speculated. Everyone wins in this case, even if any one favored candidate does not win
the final new vote count in the long run.
Look for loop holes, build in every imaginable level of fraud prevention. We can
settle for nothing less. But first we have to know all the ways to Sunday voting fraud
can possibly take place. Democrats should be joining in this speculation – surely
Stacey Abrams would want to know more about her "stolen" Georgia governors race
election. She might have been on to this a lot earlier than 2020. Reply
They are doing a lot more than just count the ballots, its going to take them a
month. I don't know but I assume, as everything else is being double checked, that
signatures are being validated against those previously held on file.
AZ still has enough deplorables in the population that the Governor and a lot of the
state legislature retains the will to fight the woke bolshies. AZ recently joined other
states in a commitment to defy the federal government on whatever attacks they make on the
second amendment.
Pretty sure that if the recount/audit shows that Trump actually won AZ, we are all going
to hear about it. That fact would lend support to the state fighting back against
Washington (DC?) in whatever manner the state sees appropriate. Reply
Does that not answer your own question? How indeed does one know there is a valid
vote count. Looks like a lot more failsafe mechanisms need to be put in place. This new
survey will be a good place to get started adding deeper transparency to the process.
Continuing to use vote counting systems that cannot be made transparent is one way not
to ensure vote count integrity.
A couple of layers that need a lot more transparency: valid registration; valid
ballots; valid counting; valid reporting. . Reply
For a start it is being done under the unblinking gaze of 9 CCTV always online to
the Internet.
Every aspect of the votes is being checked from signatures to mail in ballot folds,
visually and with UV. All ballets sent for manual intervention in November are being
digitally rechecked.
The hardware and its firmware, comms links and associated software is also being
pulled apart.
On top of that electors are going to be interviewed to double check that what they
thought they voted was recorded. The external teams will also investigate the large
number of ballots from single addresses.
AZ was won with a majority of under 12,000 so if failed votes over that are found
all kinds of issues arise. This is no doubt with the Democrats have a very large crack
team of lawyers on the job. As an example, in the court case today they have apparently
forced the recusal of the current judge by appointing an attorney who was once one of
his interns. Using every trick in the book. Reply
A fun part of the new state voting law in Georgia is that the state can take over voting
in counties that have shown to have problems with running elections. Some counties have
always had problems even when the state has rules for the number of ballot marking devices
per eligible voters to prevent long lines. Some counties often have interruptions in their
counting. Another function of the law is to make ballot drop off boxes more secure.
I suspect a lot of the noise against the Georgia law is that the state will take away
control of some of the polling from the local political machines and prevent unfolded
mail-in ballots from being counted. Reply
My husband has become woke in recent years. I still love him, but don't get me
started Anyway, yesterday I heard pundits on either MSNBC or CNN (of course his main
sources of news) RANTING about how, due to the new GA voting laws, that no one's
allowed to offer food and drink to people waiting to vote, and that it'll harm
minorities . Why, they could get sick or even die of thirst or starvation don't you
know! And this will discourage them from voting!
As has become typical and customary among far too many leftists, this RACIST claim
presumes that people of color can't bring a bottle of water or snack along with them if
they anticipate a long wait at the polls. I say it's racist because it infers white
people are smart and conscientious enough to have a contingency plan and take care of
themselves, but not minorities. The same goes for providing acceptable ID at the
polls, or returning absentee ballots in a timely manner, etc., etc. SMFH Reply
The audit is to be at the Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix, for Maricopa County,
Arizona. Nine cameras are set up inside at a distance that are broadcast live over the
Internet– http://www.azaudit.org Reply
Biden's Western Hemisphere foreign policy is not much different from that of Obama's,
Wayne Madsen writes.
Like proverbial bad pennies, the neocon imperialists who plagued the Barack Obama
administration have turned up in force in Joe Biden's State Department. Secretary of State
Antony Blinken has given more than winks and nods to the dastardly duo of Victoria Nuland,
slated to become Blinken's Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, the number three
position at the State Department, and Samantha Power, nominated to become the Administrator of
the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
Nuland and Power both have problematic spouses who do not fail to offer their imperialistic
opinions regardless of the appearance of conflicts-of-interest. Nuland's husband is the
claptrappy neocon warmonger Robert Kagan, someone who has never failed to urge to prod the
United States into wars that only benefit Israel. Power's husband is the totally creepy Cass
Sunstein, who served as Obama's White House "information czar" and advocated government
infiltration of non-governmental organizations and news media outlets to wage psychological
warfare campaigns.
True to form, Blinken's State Department has already come to the aid of Venezuela's
right-wing self-appointed "opposition leader" Juan Guaido, whose actual constituency is found
in the wealthy gated communities of Venezuelan and Cuban expatriates in south Florida and not
in the barrios of Caracas or Maracaibo.
Blinken and his team of old school yanqui imperialists have also criticized the
constitutional and judicially-warranted detention of former interim president Jeanine
Áñez, who became president in 2019 after the Movement Toward Socialism (MAS)
government of President Evo Morales was overthrown in a Central Intelligence Agency-inspired
and -directed military coup. The far-right forces backing Áñez were roundly
defeated in the October 2020 election that swept MAS and Morales's chosen presidential
candidate, Luis Arce, back into power. It seems that for Blinken and his ilk, a decisive
victory in an election only applies to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, not to Arce and MAS in
Bolivia.
It should be recalled that while Blinken was national security adviser to then-Vice
President Biden in the Obama administration, every sort of deception and trickery was used by
the CIA to depose Morales in Bolivia and President Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela. In fact, the
Obama administration, with Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, claimed its first Latin
American political victim when a CIA coup was launched against progressive President Manuel
Zelaya of Honduras. Today, Honduras is ruled by a right-wing kleptocratic narco-president, Juan
Orlando Hernández, whose brother, Tony Hernández, is currently serving life in
federal prison in the United States for drug trafficking. For the likes of Blinken, Power,
Nuland, and former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice, who currently serves as
"domestic policy adviser" to Biden, suppression of progressive governments and support for
right-wing dictators and autocrats have always been the preferred foreign policy, particularly
for the Western Hemisphere. For example, while the Biden administration remains quiet on
right-wing regimes in Central America that are responsible for the outflow of thousands of
beleaguered Mayan Indians to the southern U.S. border with Mexico, it has announced that Trump
era sanctions on 24 Nicaraguan government officials, including President Daniel Ortega's wife
and Nicaragua's vice president, Rosario Murillo, as well as three of their sons –
Laureano, Rafael, and Juan Carlos – will continue.
Biden's Western Hemisphere foreign policy is not much different from that of Obama's. Biden
and Brazilian far-right, Adolf Hitler-loving, and Covid pandemic-denying President Jair
Bolsonaro are said to have struck a deal on environmental protection of the Amazon Basin ahead
of an April 22 global climate change virtual summit called by the White House. A coalition of
198 Brazilian NGOs, representing environmental, indigenous rights, and other groups, has
appealed to Biden not to engage in any rain forest protection agreement with the untrustworthy
Bolsonaro. The Brazilian president has repeatedly advocated the wholesale deforestation of the
Amazon region. Meanwhile, while Biden urges Americans to maintain Covid public health measures,
Bolsonaro continues to downplay the virus threat as Brazil's overall death count approaches
that of the United States.
Blinken's State Department has been relatively quiet on the Northern Triangle of Central
America fascist troika of Presidents Orlando of Honduras, Alejandro Giammattei of Guatemala,
and Nayib Bukele of El Salvador. Instead of pressuring these fascistas to democratize and stop
their genocidal policies toward the indigenous peoples of their nations, Biden told Mexican
President Andrés Manuel López Obrador that he would pump $4 billion into supposed
"assistance" to those countries to stop the flow of migrants. Biden is repeating the same old
American gambits of the past. Any U.S. assistance to kleptocratic countries like those of the
Northern Triangle has and will line the pockets of their corrupt leaders. Flush with U.S. aid
cash, Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador will be sure to grant contracts to greedy Israeli
counter-insurgency contractors always at the ready to commit more human rights abuses against
the workers, students, and indigenous peoples of Central America.
Biden is also in no hurry to reverse the freeze imposed by Donald Trump on U.S.-Cuban
relations. Biden, whose policy toward Cuba represents a fossilized relic of the Cold War,
intends to maintain Trump's freeze on U.S. commercial, trade, and tourism relations with Cuba.
Biden's Homeland Security Secretary, Alejandro Mayorkas, a Jewish Cuban-American expatriate, is
expected to reach out to right-wing Cuban-Americans in south Florida in order to ensure
Democratic Party inroads in the 2022 and 2024 U.S. elections. Therefore, even restoring the
status quo ante established by Barack Obama is off-the-table for Biden, Blinken, and Mayorkas.
The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the Cuban-American and
ethically-challenged Democrat Bob Menendez, has stated there will be no normalization of
pre-Trump relations with Cuba until his "regime change" whims are satisfied. Regurgitating
typical right-wing Cuban-American drivel, Mayorkas has proclaimed after he was announced as the
new Homeland Security Secretary, "I have been nominated to be the DHS Secretary and oversee the
protection of all Americans and those who flee persecution in search of a better life for
themselves and their loved ones." The last part of that statement was directed toward the
solidly Republican bloc of moneyed Cuban, Venezuelan, Nicaraguan, and Bolivian interests in
south Florida.
While Blinken hurls his neocon invectives at Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, and Cuba, he
remains silent on the repeated foot-dragging by embattled and highly unpopular right-wing
Chilean President Sebastian Pinera on implementing a new Constitution to replace that put into
place in 1973 by the fascist military dictator General Augusto Pinochet. The current Chilean
Constitution is courtesy of Richard Nixon's foreign policy "Svengali," the duplicitous Henry
Kissinger, an individual who obviously shares Blinken's taste for "realpolitik" adventurism on
a global scale.
While Blinken has weighed in on the domestic politics of Bolivia, Venezuela, Nicaragua, and
Cuba, he has had no comment on the anti-constitutional moves by Colombian far-right
authoritarian President Ivan Duque, the front man for that nation's Medellin narcotics cartel.
It would also come as no surprise if Blinken, Nuland, and Power have quietly buttressed the
candidacy of right-wing banker, Guillermo Lasso, who is running against the progressive
socialist candidate Andrés Arauz, the protegé of former president Rafael Correa.
Blinken can be expected to question the results of the April 11 if Lasso cries fraud in the
event of an Arauz victory. Conversely, Blinken will remain silent if Lasso wins and Arauz cries
foul. That has always been the nature of U.S. Western Hemisphere policy, regardless of what
party controls the White House.
This was Bush racket. Invasion on false pretenses to establish a foothold
and get to former USSR republic. This move was initially a big success (and
Putin helped by using his influence on Northern Alliance) but later
backfire. In other words this was typical imperial policy.
I would guess 2 things, 1. He's hoping if he ends the war then none
of the terrorists that just snuck in won't attack. 2. He plans on
starting a war elsewhere.
"Obama may have gotten (U.S. soldiers) out wrong, but going in is,
to me, the biggest single mistake made in the history of our
country." -- Donald J. Trump
The policies of the Biden administration towards Russia and China are delusional. It
thinks that it can squeeze these countries but still successfully ask them for cooperation.
It believes that the U.S. position is stronger than it really is and that China and Russia
are much weaker than they are.
It is also full of projection. The U.S. accuses both countries of striving for empire, of
wanting to annex more land and of human rights violations. But is only the U.S. that has
expanding aspirations. Neither China nor Russia are interested in running an empire. They
have no interest in planting military bases all over the world. Though both have marginal
border conflicts they do not want to acquire more land. And while the U.S. bashes both
countries for alleged human rights issues it is starving whole populations (Yemen, Syria,
Venezuela) through violence and economic sanctions.
The U.S. power structures in the Pentagon and CIA use the false accusations against Russia
and China as pretense for cold military and hot economic wars against both countries. They
use color revolution schemes (Ukraine, Myanmar) to create U.S. controlled proxy forces near
their borders.
At the same time as it tries to press these countries the U.S. is seeking their
cooperation in selected fields. It falsely believes that it has some magical leverage.
Consider this exchange from yesterday's White House
press briefing about Biden asking for a summit with Putin while, at the same time,
implementing more sanctions against Russia:
Q What if [Putin] says "no," though? Wouldn't that indicate some weakness on the part of
the American administration here?
MS. PSAKI: Well, I think the President's view is that Russia is on the outside of the
global community in many respects, at this point in time. It's the G7, not the G8. They
have -- obviously, we've put sanctions in place in order to send a clear message that there
should be consequences for the actions; the Europeans have also done that.
What the President is offering is a bridge back. And so, certainly, he believes it's in
their interests to take him up on that offer.
The G7 are not the 'global community'. They have altogether some 500 million inhabitants
out of 7.9 billion strong global population. Neither China nor India are members of the G7
nor is any South American or African country. Moreover Russia has
rejected a Russian return into the G7/8 format:
"Russia is focused on other formats, apart from the G7," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov
said in a brief statement ..
Russia has no interest in a summit which would only be used by the U.S. to further bash
Russia. Why should it give Biden that pleasure when there is nothing that Russia would gain
from it. Russia does not need a 'bridge back'. There will be no summit.
... ... ...
If Biden wants cooperation with Russia or China he needs to reign in the hawks and stop
his attacks on those countries. As he is not willing or capable of doing that any further
cooperation attempts will fall flat.
The U.S. has to learn that it is no longer the top dog. It can not work ceaselessly to
impact Russia's and China's military and economic security and still expect them to
cooperate. If it wants something it will first have to cease the attacks and to accept
multilateral relationships.
Posted by b on April 17, 2021 at 17:53 UTC |
Permalink
"It can not work ceaselessly to impact Russia's and China's military and economic security
and still expect them to cooperate"
You have to understand the USA. They're doing it against Europe on a daily basis, and it
actually works... Get them confused why it doesn't always work against others.
It's interesting what's happening right now (in the past hour or so).
First: Russian and Belorussian news about the arrest of leaders (or key participants) of
an attempted military coup in Belarus, planned by the US security services.
Then, 30 minutes later: the Czechs expel 18 Russian diplomats, accusing them of spying and
of connection to some explosion back in 2014.
I could've been skeptical about the details of the first story, but the second one seems
to confirm it. The second story appears to be an obvious attempt to squeeze the first one out
of the news. And who else could order the Czech government to do this with a 30 minute
notice?
Wouldn't Oceania rulers love to print more of their own currency to buy up all the paper
rights to industrial output without having to invest in the factories or anything else! They
love this kind of business model.
"The secret of success is to own nothing but control everything."
Because of what's at stake and how little I trust Oceania, I confess I no longer have an
opinion about global warming. Even if many of its scientists are *earnest*, who obtained,
processed, and stored the data before they started building models? Those institutions are
capable of anything.
Hundreds of corporations, including Starbucks, Amazon, and Netflix, have signed a letter signaling their opposition to election
integrity efforts in numerous states, promising to oppose any related legislation they deem "discriminatory."
The effort, led by former American Express chief executive Kenneth Chenault and Merck chief executive Kenneth Frazier, both of
whom recently
led
a
group of black business leaders urging corporations to take a stand against election integrity efforts, has corporations vowing
to stand against "any discriminatory legislation," representing what the
New
York Times
deemed
"the
broadest coalition yet to weigh in on the issue."
"We stand for democracy," the statement
reads
.
"A beautifully American idea, but a reality denied to many for much of this nation's history. As Americans, we know that in our
democracy we should not expect to agree on everything":
However, regardless of our political affiliations, we believe the very foundation of our electoral process rests upon the
ability of each of us to cast our ballots for the candidates of our choice. For American democracy to work for any of us, we
must ensure the right to vote for all of us. We all should feel a responsibility to defend the right to vote and to oppose any
discriminatory legislation or measures that restrict or prevent any eligible voter from having an equal and fair opportunity
to cast a ballot.
"Voting is the lifeblood of our democracy," the statement continues, calling on Americans to take a "nonpartisan stand for this
most basic and fundamental right of all Americans."
Signers include Bank of America, Amazon,
Estée
Lauder
, Eventbrite, General Motors, Netflix, Starbucks, Synchrony, Nordstrom, PayPal, Peloton, Pinterest, United Airlines,
Twitter, Under Armour, and more.
Some, such as Coca-Cola and Delta, which spoke out after Georgia passed its election integrity law, did not add their names to
the list, nor did Home Depot
, as the
Times
reported:
Coca-Cola and Delta, which condemned the Georgia law after it was passed, declined to add their names, according to people
familiar with the matter. Home Depot also declined, even though its co-founder Arthur Blank said in a call with other business
executives on Saturday that he supported voting rights. Another Home Depot co-founder, Ken Langone, is a vocal supporter of
Mr. Trump.
Coca-Cola and Delta declined to comment. Home Depot said in a statement on Tuesday that "the most appropriate approach for us
to take is to continue to underscore our belief that all elections should be accessible, fair and secure."
JPMorgan Chase also declined to sign the statement despite a personal request from senior Black business leaders to the
chief executive, Jamie Dimon, according to people briefed on the matter. Mr. Dimon has publicly declared that he supports
Black Lives Matter and made a statement on voting rights before many other companies, saying, "We believe voting must be
accessible and equitable."
"It should be clear that there is overwhelming support in corporate America for the principle of voting rights," Chenault said.
While the statement does not list specific state election efforts, it follows the debate over Georgia's recently signed election
integrity law, which the left has
inundated
with
misinformation, including the false claims it eliminates "Souls to the Polls," thereby suppressing minority votes. In reality,
the law expands ballot access in several ways, including by
increasing
the
mandatory days for early weekend voting.
"The nuts and bolts of [the law] are this, it makes it easy to vote and hard to cheat," Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R)
said
during
a March appearance on
Breitbart
News Daily
:
The biggest -- probably the top four things to me -- is it replaces a signature match with a voter ID on absentee ballots. It
secures ballot drop boxes around the clock It also requires poll workers to continue tabulating ballots until all votes are
counted and then it actually -- contrary to what the national media and those that are profiting off of this whole exercise of
not being truthful with people -- expands voting access, especially on the weekends.
A Rasmussen Reports survey
released
last
this week revealed a majority of likely voters, or 60 percent, believe it is more important to make sure there is no cheating in
elections rather than prioritizing making it "easier for everybody to vote." Additionally, a majority of likely voters, including
a majority of black voters,
reject
the
notion that voter ID laws are discriminatory against some voters.
Dementia Joe and his coterie of enablers have embarked on a foreign policy that is likely to result in a new war that will
endanger America and further a growing perception that the United States is weak and divided. There are three troublesome
flashpoints (Ukraine, China and Iran) that could explode at any time and catapult our nation into a costly, deadly military
confrontation. Topping the list is the Ukraine.
The corrupt dealings in Ukraine over the last four years by Joe and Hunter Biden leaves them completely compromised and
subject to coercion, even blackmail. With this as a backdrop the decade long effort by the United States to weaken Russia's
influence in eastern Ukraine has been revived with Biden's arrival in the White House.
Let me first introduce you to some essential facts:
Larry Johnson,
If the Ukraine blows so will Syria! Then the situation might transition from nemesis to tisis in short order. Here is a
strangely appropriate analysis with just one word blanked out.
In the
years ahead, _____________ will assuredly find itself in new international crises involving nations or groups that have
powerful leaders. In some cases, these leaders may have a special, dangerous mindset that is the result of a
"hubris-nemesis complex." This complex involves a combination of hubris (a pretension toward an arrogant form of
godliness) and nemesis (a vengeful desire to confront, defeat, humiliate, and punish an adversary, especially one that
can be accused of hubris). The combination has strange dynamics that may lead to destructive, high-risk behavior.
Attempts to deter, compel, or negotiate with a leader who has a hubris-nemesis complex can be ineffectual or even
disastrously counterproductive when those attempts are based on concepts better suited to dealing with more normal
leaders.
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR461.pdf
We, too, pray for sanity.
Ishmael Zechariah
Reply
Larry, I unfortunately agree with your observations and conclusion.
I would add that in my opinion, the Russians are a lot more determined, as are the Chinese and Iranians, then the
generally self absorbed younger generations in the West. "Woke" culture has no answer to sunken warships, downed
aircraft and body bags. Do the SJWs want to die for LBGTIQ rights in Russia or another of their pet obsessions de jour?
I don't think so.
My concern for President Biden and America is that, if Ukraine attacks, unless President Putin succeeds in delivering a
very short, sharp and successful lesson to Ukraine there is not going to be a clear path forward to a negotiated
armistice. If that doesn't happen through bad luck, the fog of war, etc. Then I don't think Biden has the intelligence
to get us out of the mess.
If you add to that the possibility that Zelensky may demand American support "or else" when he starts to lose then we
are in very very dangerous territory. If I were the Chinese, I would just stand back and watch. Taiwanese independence
is a meaningless concept without American military backing and I'm sure the Taiwanese know it.
The wild card to me is what is Israel's attitude? Is it possible that they might be a moderating influence for a change?
Reply
Oh, yeah .!!!!!! The country that shoots women and children who get too close to the fence they have constructed in
PALESTINE on other people"s land will be the moderating party. Or maybe Mad Dog Bolton.
Try getting real, and come up with real world situations. Not some fantasy of killers acting like kittens. The
Russians seem more balanced in responding to such provocations than the U.S. & it's gang of follower- puppets. How
long would any of the these follower-puppets be able to go toe to toe with Russia in all-out-war situation. I'd bet
less than 24 hours, probably far less. Or as a Chinese General once asked: would you want to give up Los Angeles to
save Tiwan? The U.S. doesn't seem to have any sort of reliable anti-missile defence system. Would Ole Uncle Joe
really like to get into such pissing contest so early on in his term of presidency? Maybe I am wrong, but from what I
have seen so far, he just seems to be throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks. In this game, if one
blunders, the walls vanish, an the lights go out.
Reply
Russia moves cannon boats and amphibious vessels from Caspian Sea to the Black Sea, but in reality these combatants are
perfect for operations in shallow waters and that means Azov Sea and Ukraine's South-Western flank. These ships can form
both a surface group capable of dispatching anything Ukraine may have on Azov Sea, plus form excellent tactical
amphibious group which can land a battalion or two of marines and support them with fire from the sea, both artillery
and MLRS. Of course, there are other forces Russia has there but it is a good way to give Caspian Flotilla a chance for
yet another combat deployment, after its missile ships spearheaded first salvos of 3M14 cruise missiles at ISIS targets
in Syria in 2015. Here are some of those ships:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/Caspian_Corvette_Astrakhan_2.jpg
Russia has an overwhelming firepower in the Black Sea proper and whatever the US is sending there is primarily for ISR
purposes in case Ukies go bananas and decide to attack Donbass in death by cop scenario. The US will not interfere in
any meaningful way other than supplying Ukies with recon data.
Reply
It is bigger than Biden or even the Military Industrial Complex. The establishment foreign policy apparatus transcends
political parties and has a continuity that survives changes in administrations. It is obsessed with Russia. It opposed
not just communism but Russia itself so when the Berlin wall fell for it the Cold War never ended and it successfully
pursued the the break up and looting of the Russian Empire and the relentless eastward march of NATO. Putin pushed back
on this resulting in him being demonized by the orchestrated Western media. Trump for all his faults had at least a
halfway rational view of these matters but now the Borg is back and spoiling for a fight. I never cease to be amazed by
the stupidity of these people, their apparent lack of understanding of the importance of Ukraine and Sevastopol in
Russian history and their inability to read a map or know the basics of military operations to see the obvious
indefensibility of Ukraine's eastern border. The danger now is that Ukraine's leaders will overestimate the support they
think they have from the United States and start something they can't stop. This has the feel of 1914.
Reply
Or the Georgian/Russian of 2008 when Georgia attacked on Russian territory. President Bush was talking tough, saying
he would send aid to Georgia on warships. But the rules governing ships entering the Bosferus proscribed such stuff,
aND Bush ended doing nothing. The Russians quickly neutralized the Georgian forces and pushed deeper into Georgia
where they currently remain. The odiot who started the mess was forced out of Georgia & was afterwards appointed a
governor or some such in Ukraine. But I think that too went bad. Such is the level of governance in Ukraine.
Reply
The last 5 Ukros killed were killed by mines. The contact line has many zones where minefields are employed by both
sides. It appears some were killed in their own minefield according to local reports. Civilians in the LPR and DPR have
been killed by incoming fire, most recently a 5 year old boy. Of course OSCE is worthless except as a "bean counter";
who fired what and where is too much to record..
Reply
US defence attache with a group was up at the front yesterday as well as the comic.
Ukraine really has its back up against the wall financially. This year with big interest payments due and no way to get
the funds as the IMF seems to hit its limit on their 'we're never getting it back' budget. Their only steady source of
funds is ironically Russia with the gas transit fees guaranteed at $7B total over the next four years, much of which
will go to the EU and IMF as interest payments. After that the gas fees will drop to zero as the gas transits move to
TurkStream and NS2. With nothing to pay Russia, apart from the little mentioned oil transit fees, Russia may stop
shipping gas/coal/electricity for local consumption as well. At that point either Ukraine crashes or someone else has to
pick up the bill.
Although Kiev will lose dramatically there are very good reasons why Kiev would push the button. Will they ever again
have this PR opportunity to play the innocent victim?
Reply
Earlier this morning I saw a pic of Zelenskiy visiting the front, behind him was a makeshift field tent with a sign on
it, the sign is in Ukrainian but translates as "Vietnam". Is Biden serious about backing Zelenskiy, I guess we'll find
out soon enough.
Reply
wondering if anyone can point me to a fairly, anyway, reliable, (assuming one exists) 'war games scenario' document on
an attempted invasion of Taiwan by China. Intuitively, it would seem a difficult challenge, especially given China's
lack of any appreciable experience in seaborne invasion. Thanks in advance for any help anyone can provide, and my
apologies upfront LJ if you deem this offtopic.
Reply
Not meaning to be a smart-alec about it, but why assume that an invasion has to be "seaborne"?
In WW2 the Royal Navy had total control of the waters around Crete. So the Germans simply went over the top of them
and invaded the island from the air.
It was very definitely touch and go for a while until German paratroopers managed to capture an airfield, and from
that point it was all over.
No idea how well defended Taiwanese airfields are, but the PLA would only need to capture one and, again, the final
result will not be in doubt.
Reply
well, the quick answer to your question would be 'fine, alter my initial question to include war games scenarios
on airborne attacks on Taiwan. The glib answer might be, Taiwan is not Crete. And the Chinese PLA are not the
Wehrmacht. Who, by the time of the Crete attack had built up a record that included many successful airborne
attacks. I see no such history with the PLA. That, by no means rules it out. But, in any event, I can't imagine
the PLA would role the dice, SOLELY, on an airborne attack. They would have to have a seaborne plan of attack, in
case Plan A failed. So, in any event, I would be still be in search of that war games scenario.
Reply
Absent any new evidence, I am going to continue to assume that this is really about Nordstream II. The Biden Junta are
probably planning on having their Ukrainian cat's paw make a lunge at DNR/LNR, forcing the Russians to intervene
directly. Ukraine, of course, is not actually a full NATO member, so no Article 5 will be triggered. Instead, Washington
just self-righteously hollers 'Russian aggression!' and demands that Merkel immediately shut down Nordstream II -- the
Russian pipeline into Germany -- just before it's ready to go online.
And then, as a lush reward for their undying loyalty, the Germans get to import frack-gas and oil all the way from the
US at four or five times the market rate. Problem solved!
Reply
you are correct – the Ukraine state does not really want the return of the Donbass region let alone Crimea as it
would result in a complete change in the balance of power in the Ukraine with the Russian-speaking population being
able to form the government, as it had done pre 2014. They really want to push the Germans into stopping Nord Stream
2 by provoking Russia
Reply
Struggling to understand how a Ukraine with such supposedly strong ties to National Socialists of a century ago managed
to end up with a Jewish comedian as President.
Reply
Here's the viewpoint of Ukraine Army's snipers who are primarily composed of volunteer housewives. While to D.C. and
Moscow, it's part of their sphere of political chess, however to those on the front lines, it is survival and protection
of their loved ones.
Almost half a century ago, I took a course in the German language as a refresher during the summer session at my local
junior college. The woman who taught the course was a native Ukrainian. She told the class a little about her
background.
When the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union, she was in her mid- to late-teens. She had an intense dislike (hatred) of the
Russians and took a job working for the German military government of occupation as an interpreter. She said they had
welcomed the Germans as liberators from the oppression of the Soviet Communists.
Later, when the Red Army juggernaut was rolling west through Ukraine, she realized that it would not be good for her
long-term prospects to remain at home. She chose to move west with the retreating German army. Subsequent to the end of
the war in Europe, she rattled around for awhile in displaced person camps, and ultimately made her way to the United
States.
I have no reason to doubt the veracity of her story. This was my first introduction to the enmity between the Russians
and the Ukrainians.
Reply
Biden is a tin-hat emperor moving tin soldiers in his bathtub at play time. Surrounded by self-selected idiots who make
him dangerous as hell. This is what his "return to decency" looks like? May he be struck down deaf and dumb.
Reply
Two front war – Russia moving into Ukraine at the same time China moves on Taiwan. They put their wet fingers up to the
wind to see which way the Biden operation blows.
And they could not escape the conclusion this was the time to strike if there is any fortuitous time to strike. Biden
and his new team muddle deeply into reckless ineptitude. And Kamala Harris doesn't have anything to wear.
Reply
An odd thesis. The Russians are signally very, very strongly that they do not want the Ukraine to start a war by
attacking the rebels in Donbass.
They could not be more explicit if they sent a hypersonic cruise missile through Zelensky's office window with a sign
on it that reads "Don't start something you won't even live to regret".
They very clearly do not think that this is "the time to strike", nor even that they think there is a "fortuitous
time" for them to go to war with Ukraine.
If Ukraine strikes first then, sure, they'll strike back. But I fail to see how anyone can come to the conclusion
that the Russians are provoking this when it is very clearly the Ukies and their promoters in the White House who are
pushing these buttons.
Similarly with Taiwan.
The Chinese are not provoking this. They made their red lines clear to everyone as far back as Nixon's trip to China
i.e. if the USA sticks to a one-China-policy then the mainland will refrain from using force against Taiwan.
But the USA is not sticking to the one-China-policy. Recent US diplomatic moves look exactly like what it is:
maneuverings to prepare for when the Taipei government declares independence.
Which is crazy.
But in both cases the USA may well provoke a conflict and then dump their patsies like a discarded toy.
Which would be beyond crazy. It would be an outcome so loopy that there isn't even a word to describe it.
Reply
Thank you for setting it straight.. it seems pretty evident Russia does not want a war but is sure as hell ready
to finish this business if a war is pushed on to them and pushed on to them by the Americans. Ukraine has been
armed by the U.S , funded by the IMF, and cheered by NATO. They will not do a single thing without their owners
permission.
Reply
Back in December 2020 Putin had an expanded meeting with his Defense Ministry Board. In it he laid out several items and
agendas to be carried out by the Military Staff.
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64684
March 24th saw Ukraine's Zelensky virtually declaring war against the Russian Federation. One can not rule out Zelensky
using the trade deals with Doha and use the direct flights between Kiev and Doha to smuggle in Jihad's from Syria and
Libya to fight in Donbas. Zelensky on March 3rd in a joint press conference with the European Council President in Kiev
stated that the retaking of Crimea from Russia was now Ukraine Official Policy.
https://asiatimes.com/2021/04/ukraine-redux-war-russophobia-and-pipelineistan/
Reply
Speaking of 'foreign policy', question is who will win out -- D.C. or Tel Aviv?
'The model' is headed to D.C. to try and convince our IC's head-cheeses that the Iran JCPOA isn't such a good deal, and
Tel Aviv is trying to get him an audience with his high-arsed the 'King', China Joe. If D.C. swallows 'the model's'
spiel, then they're bigger suckers than they already appear to be.
Assume this Mossad meeting will take place between Kackling Kamala who will be channeling Obama-Jarrett; or will it
be Stinking Liar Susan Rose channeling Obama-Jarrett? But the Big Guy will be out to lunch.
Reply
" voters still overwhelmingly support laws requiring that voters show identification before casting a ballot.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 75% of Likely U.S. Voters believe voters should be
required to show photo identification such as a driver's license before being allowed to vote. Only 21% are opposed to such a
requirement. (To see survey question wording,
click
here
.)
"Support for voter ID laws has actually
increased
since 2018
, when 67% said voters should be required to show photo identification such as a driver's license before being
allowed to vote.
Eighty-nine percent (89%) of Republicans support voter ID requirements, as do 60% of Democrats and 77% of voters not affiliated
with either major party."
Comment: In Virginia it was not necessary to present identification at a polling place untl about 20 years ago. This was a relic
of an older time when most Virginia communities were quite small and it was expected that one or more people would recognize
acitizen at the polling station,
IMO the time has come when national ID cards would be a good thing. The trick would be to make it as tamper proof as possible. pl
I recently got a new driver's license, the kind that complies with airport security in order to be able to fly. And boy, my
county Department of Motor Vehicles office was absolutely TOUGH, real hard asses, when it came to the documentation required to
qualify for such a license. I had to go back THREE TIMES with various documents in order to satisfy them and meet their criteria
EXACTLY, with no exceptions. So did my husband. I would hope that any national ID, if ever mandated, would be obtained by
fulfilling similarly rigorous standards and conscientious processing. I bet it would set off leftists and libertarian-leaning
rightists BIG TIME though, for different reasons: leftists would want lax standards and libertarians would oppose the notion
per
se
.
High profile attorney means possible troubles for Dominion and its lobbyists. such layers ten
not leave a single stone unturned, which is not in Dominion best interest. Emails will definitely
be subpoenaed and judging from the behaviour of one Dominion executive they were not too
careful.
I kel the joke "Are their lawyers also going to argue that no reasonable person would believe
Fox news?"
Fox News has hired two high-profile defense attorneys to combat a $1.6 billion lawsuit filed
against it by voting technology company Dominion.
The media outlet disclosed in a court filing that it had Charles Babcock and Scott Keller
for its defense. Fox News confirmed the hirings to The Hill.
... ... ...
Fox News Media told The Hill after Dominion filed its suit that it is "proud of our 2020
election coverage, which stands in the highest tradition of American journalism, and will
vigorously defend against this baseless lawsuit in court."
And yet discovery will be very interesting, and Fox News is now pitted against Dominion,
and their best way to defend themselves is to show that the criticisms were legitimate...
Fox can now subpoena anything relevant from Dominion, and Dominion has to comply or be
criminally prosecuted...
There is not much to discover with Dominion. It mainly functions like a windows 10
computer. so it is hackable. It is very easy to install fraudulent software on these
machines
See Harryi Hursti KILL CHAIN: THE CYBERWAR ON AMERICA'S ELECTIONS and look at his
affidavit See "Investigators for Attorney DePernoReportedly Discover Modem Chips Embedded in
Michigan Voting System Computer Motherboards" via today on theGatewayPundit
When testifying before the MI legislature, the Dominion CEO recommended that a full
forensic audit be ordered if voters suspect that these machines were connected to the
internet.
On Dec 1 election officials deleted the electronic voting data in violation of state
la
Sidney Powell lit a fuse. She woke the Republicans and others who want election integrity,
so the Democrats won't be able to steal any more. At least not with the same tactics
Lou Dobbs might have gotten confused once. I believe he said that an affidavit that
criticized Smartmatic had instead criticized Dominion. However, there are so many problems
with Dominion, I would consider it to be an immaterial mistake. After all these machines
appear to be unusable:
[Vote counting machines] "presents serious system security vulnerability and
operational issues that may place plaintiffs and other voters at risk of
deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote that is
accurately counted," U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg wrote in a Oct 2020
Electionic vote counting machines were banned in France, Ireland and the in
the Netherlands via Gateway Pundit because they were unreliable.
The Gateway pundit could be sued if they make false statements.
via Twitter:
Elections Canada @ElectionsCan_E
· Nov 16
Elections Canada does not use Dominion Voting Systems. We use paper ballots counted by
hand in front of scrutineers and have never used voting machines or electronic tabulators to
count votes in our
100-year history. #CdnPoli
It is very easy to install fraudulent software on these machines See Harryi Hursti on
seeKILL CHAIN: THE CYBERWAR ON AMERICA'S
ELECTIONS and look at his affidavit
The actual claim is here (400+ pages):
www DOT documentcloud DOT org/documents/20527880-dominion-v-fox-news-complaint
These lawyers have their work cut out for them. As explained in the claim, Dominion
contacted Fox multiple times after the first accusations. They provided Fox with independent
assessments and other evidence that their systems were sound. Fox ignored it, never mentioned
this and continued presenting that Dominion systems were fraudulent (and stated that as a
fact, not as an opinion).
Once again, FOX News will likely claim that they are an entertainment network, not a
news agency ... and therefore they should not be expected to propagate facts on their
broadcasts.
Dominion fights as its image was damaged and it has deep pockets. But how valid are their
claim is for the court to decide. In no way they are as clean as they pretend. Their connection
Dem party operatives is probably provable beyond reasonable doubt. The whole story with Dominion
replacing Diebold on this business is murky to the extreme.
Roger Parloff · Contributor Tue, April
13, 2021, 5:06 AM · 22 min read
... "Instantly," said Steven
Bellovin , a professor of computer science at Columbia University with almost 40 years of
experience in computer networking and security. That's how long it took him to realize, he said
in an interview, that a certain purported spreadsheet that I showed him was "not just fake, but
a badly generated fake by someone who didn't know what they were doing."
The spreadsheet, together with an animated film that was said to illustrate its data, formed
the crux of a nearly two-hour "docu-movie," called "Absolute Proof," which aired at least 13
times last February on the One America News Network. The movie, presented in a news magazine
format, was hosted, co-produced, and relentlessly flacked by Mike Lindell, the irrepressible
CEO of MyPillow, Inc. It purported to furnish absolute proof that the 2020 presidential
election was stolen from then-President Donald Trump in an international cyberattack exploiting
vulnerabilities in voting-machine software that had been intentionally designed to rig
elections.
Dominion Voting Systems, which makes voting technology, filed a $1.3 billion defamation suit
against Lindell and his company in late February -- the third of four massive cases it has
filed since the election -- in part because of "Absolute Proof," which referenced Dominion more
than 40 times. (An in-depth analysis of Dominion's suits over bogus election-fraud claims, as
well as one brought by a rival voting-device company, Smartmatic, is provided in an earlier
story I wrote
here .)
The column is extremely week and fragments are republished here for the sole purpose to
critique/
I think Dean Baker is very superficial here. Dominion is a corporation business model of
which is based on lobbying Congress and states. It is definitely closely connected to the
Democratic Party apparatchiks. This is a very questionable model. So now it tried to present
being White Knight defending itself again absurd claims like Hugo Chaves claim. This does not
change the nature of their business. In reality this is two dirty persons struggling in a mud
peat.
Also the key question remains unanswered: are Dominion machines do any good to the USA voting
system? If yes, then defending itself makes some positive sense. If not, why bother?
...Hugo Chavez, the former president of Venezuela who has been dead for eight years, figures
prominently in many of the stories. Nonetheless, many Fox News viewers believe them.
For a voting machine manufacturer, the claim that your machines are rigged is pretty much a
textbook definition of a damaging statement. Therefore, Dominion should have a pretty solid
case.
Sullivan doesn't dispute any of this, instead, she points out that libel or defamation suits
can also be used against news outlets doing serious reporting. She highlights the case of
Reveal, a nonprofit news outfit that is dedicated to investigative reporting. Reveal was nearly
forced out of business due to the cost of defending itself against a charity that it exposed as
being run by a cult. Sullivan's takeaway is that defamation lawsuits can be used as a weapon
against legitimate news organizations doing serious reporting.
Sullivan is right on this point, but wrong in understanding the implications. Every
civil course of action can be abused by those with money to harm people without substantial
resources. There are tens of thousands of frivolous tort cases filed every year, but would
anyone argue that we should deny people the right to sue a contractor that mistakenly sets
their customer's house on fire? The same applies to suits for breach of contract. If I pay
someone $10,000 in advance to paint my house and they don't do it, should I not be able to sue
to get my money back?
... ... ...
The reality is that our legal system can be abused by the powerful to harm those with
less power. That is the result of the enormous disparities of income and power in this country,
and the inadequate shields against abuse in the legal system...
The World Health Organization recently published its report on the
origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus which has caused the Covid-19 pandemic. Most scientist agree
that the virus is of zoonotic origin and not a human construct or an accidental laboratory
escape. But the U.S. wants to put pressure on China and advised the Director General of the
WHO, Tedros Adhanom, to keep the focus on China potential culpability. He acted accordingly
when he
remarked on his agency's report:
Although the team has concluded that a laboratory leak is the least likely hypothesis, this
requires further investigation, potentially with additional missions involving specialist
experts, which I am ready to deploy.
The Governments of Australia, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Israel, Japan, Latvia,
Lithuania, Norway, the Republic of Korea, Slovenia, the United Kingdom, and the United
States of America remain steadfast in our commitment to working with the World Health
Organization (WHO), international experts who have a vital mission, and the global
community to understand the origins of this pandemic in order to improve our collective
global health security and response. Together, we support a transparent and independent
analysis and evaluation, free from interference and undue influence, of the origins of the
COVID-19 pandemic. In this regard, we join in expressing shared concerns regarding the
recent WHO-convened study in China, while at the same time reinforcing the importance of
working together toward the development and use of a swift, effective, transparent,
science-based, and independent process for international evaluations of such outbreaks of
unknown origin in the future.
The most interesting with the above statement is the list of U.S. allied countries which
declined to support it,
Most core EU countries, especially France, Spain, Italy and Germany, are missing from it.
As is the Five-Eyes member New Zealand. India, a U.S. ally in the anti-Chinese Quad
initiative, also did not sign. This list of signatories of the Joint Statement is an
astonishingly meager result for a U.S. 'joint' initiative. It is unprecedented. It is a sign
that something has cracked and that the world will never be the same.
The first months of he Biden administration saw a rupture in the global system. First
Russia admonished the EU for its hypocritical criticism of internal Russian issues. Biden
followed up by calling Putin a 'killer'. Then the Chinese foreign minister told the Biden
administration
to shut the fuck up about internal Chinese issues. Soon thereafter Russia's and China's
foreign ministers met and agreed to deepen their alliance and to shun the U.S. dollar. Then
China's foreign minister went on a wider Middle East tour. There he reminded U.S. allies of
their
sovereignty :
Wang said that expected goals had been achieved with regard to a five-point initiative on
achieving security and stability in the Middle East, which was proposed during the visit.
"China supports countries in the region to stay impervious to external pressure and
interference, to independently explore development paths suited to its regional realities
," Wang said, adding that the countries should " break free from the shadows of big-power
geopolitical rivalry and resolve regional conflicts and differences as masters of the
region ."
Suffice to say, the China-Iran pact deeply is embedded within a new matrix Beijing hopes to
create with the Arab states of the Persian Gulf and Iran. The pact forms part of a new
narrative on regional security and stability.
Countries in Asia and further afield are closely watching the development of this
alternative international order, led by Moscow and Beijing. And they can also recognise the
signs of increasing US economic and political decline.
It is a new kind of Cold War, but not one based on ideology like the first incarnation.
It is a war for international legitimacy, a struggle for hearts and minds and money in the
very large part of the world not aligned to the US or NATO.
The US and its allies will continue to operate under their narrative, while Russia and
China will push their competing narrative. This was made crystal clear over these past few
dramatic days of major power diplomacy.
The global balance of power is shifting, and for many nations, the smart money might be
on Russia and China now.
The obvious U.S. countermove to the Russian-Chinese initiative is to unite its allies in a
new Cold War against Russia and China. But as the Joint Statement above shows most of those
allies do not want to follow that path. China is a too good customer to be shunned. Talk of
human rights in other countries might play well with the local electorate but what counts in
the end is the business.
Even some U.S. companies can see that the hostile path the Biden administration has
followed will only be to their detriment. Some are asking the Biden gang to
tone it down :
[Boeing] Chief Executive Dave Calhoun told an online business forum he believed a major
aircraft subsidy dispute with Europe could be resolved after 16 years of wrangling at the
World Trade Organization, but contrasted this with the outlook on China.
"I think politically (China) is more difficult for this administration and it was for
the last administration. But we still have to trade with our largest partner in the world:
China," he told the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Aviation Summit.
Noting multiple disputes, he added: " I am hoping we can sort of separate intellectual
property, human rights and other things from trade and continue to encourage a free trade
environment between these two economic juggernauts. ... We cannot afford to be locked out
of that market. Our competitor will jump right in."
Before its 737 MAX debacle Boeing was the biggest U.S. exporter and China was its biggest
customer. The MAX has yet to be re-certified in China. If Washington keeps the hostile tone
against China Boeing will lose out and Europe's Airbus will make a killing.
Biden announced that "America is back" only to be told that it is no longer needed in the
oversized role that it played before. Should Washington not be able to accept that it can no
play 'unilateral' but will have to follow the real rules of international law we might be in
for some
interesting times :
Question: Finally, are you concerned that deteriorating international tensions could lead
to war?
Glenn Diesen: Yes, we should all be concerned. Tensions keep escalating and there are
increasing conflicts that could spark a major war. A war could break out over Syria,
Ukraine, the Black Sea, the Arctic, the South China Sea and other regions.
What makes all of these conflicts dangerous is that they are informed by a
winner-takes-all logic. Wishful thinking or active push towards a collapse of Russia,
China, the EU or the U.S. is also an indication of the winner-takes-all mentality. Under
these conditions, the large powers are more prepared to accept greater risks at a time when
the international system is transforming . The rhetoric of upholding liberal democratic
values also has clear zero-sum undertones as it implies that Russia and China must accept
the moral authority of the West and commit to unilateral concessions.
The rapidly shifting international distribution of power creates problems that can only
be resolved with real diplomacy. The great powers must recognize competing national
interests, followed by efforts to reach compromises and find common solutions.
Russia's president Vladimir Putin has repeatedly asked
for a summit of leaders of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council:
Putin argued that the countries that created a new global order after World War II should
cooperate to solve today's problems.
"The founder countries of the United Nations, the five states that hold special
responsibility to save civilisation, can and must be an example," he said at the sombre
memorial ceremony.
The meeting would "play a great role in searching for collective answers to modern
challenges and threats," Putin said, adding that Russia was "ready for such a serious
conversation."
Such a summit would be a chance to work on a new global system that avoids unilateralism
and block mentality. As the U.S. is now learning that its allies are not willing to follow
its anti-China and anti-Russia policies it might be willing to negotiate over a new
international system.
But as long as Washington is unable to recognize its own decline a violent attempt to
solve the issue once and for all will become more likely.
Posted by b on April 1, 2021 at 17:52 UTC |
Permalink
Very thought provoking b, I wish time off brought me back firing on all cylinders like
this!
No doubt vk will chime in here better than I but it surely cannot be a matter of "if
America decides". There are historical forces at work in this financialized phase of late
capitalism that are not grasped by the US leadership, let alone factored into intelligent
policy debates. Biden is an arch-lobbyist for the vested interests which compel the US's
unilateral and interventionist foreign policy. I'm quite sure he is incapable of 'deciding'
anything (not just mentally but institutionally). But the underlying dynamic of
world-historical change is beyond him and his whole country. The die was cast long ago when
the Soviet Union fell and the US couldn't help themselves. Junkies for unilateralism since
1989, they will keep shooting up until they OD (Boeing notwithstanding...). I suspect they
will end up like the schizoid UK, psychologically unable to accept increasing and humiliating
losses of empire until it hits the bottom of the dustbin of History.
The US-China meeting in Anchorage took place 75 years almost to the day of the Winston
Iron Curtain speech in Fulton, Missouri. Just as the latter signalled a break point in the
uneasy, war forced cohabit of the West with the communist Soviet Union, so too the Anchorage
will enter the history as the break point in the US hegemony threatening collaboration of the
West and China.
Since WW2, no other nation, not even Russia, has confronted the US so firmly and so
publicly as did Yang Jiechi, one of the ruling member of the Chinese Politburo when he said
that "the United States does not have the qualification to speak to China from a position of
strength'.
That was a slap in the face the Americans will have to respond to, and it's in the nature
of the response one will find whether the American Governing elite is prepared to share power
or go for a confrontation.
The real question is not about his neocon delusions, which are pretty predictable, but about
the ability for the USA project global dominance in the decade to come.
Blinken is a marionette. And pretty much second rate even in that.
Notable quotes:
"... Let's consider this headline for a moment: "Blinken Accuses China of Trying to Undermine US-Dominated World Order." Blinken provides us with a definition of that "world order" in his own words cited in the article: "'... preserve the rules-based international order, in which we have all invested so much over the past 75 years , and which has served our interests and values well'." [My Emphasis] ..."
Let's consider
this headline for a moment: "Blinken Accuses China of Trying to Undermine US-Dominated
World Order." Blinken provides us with a definition of that "world order" in his own words
cited in the article: "'... preserve the rules-based international order, in which we have
all invested so much over the past 75 years , and which has served our interests and
values well'." [My Emphasis]
Clearly, he's referring to the rules put in place by the UN Charter. But as we at this bar
all know, it's the Outlaw US Empire for whom Blinken works that's the #1 criminal when it
comes to violating the UN Charter which is why it's "served our interests and values
well."
Now when we turn to reality, it become very clear that China seeks to uphold the UN
Charter--it's one of the foundational members of the newly established Friends of the UN
Charter Group that the Outlaw US Empire will certainly snub because of the reality of its
actual relations to that Act and Organization .
Indeed, what is being said by the very formation of that Group is a big NO!! to the
Outlaw US Empire's attempt to say it abides by the system it's continuously violated for the
past 75+ years. Yet, it's also clear that NO!! isn't being shouted out by global media
enough, particularly when Outlaw US Empire officials give such an excellent opportunity to be
rebuffed and ridiculed for their lies.
We have many good writers here who could take Blinken's words and turn them into an
indictment of himself and the nation he represents. That implies that writers for global
publications are just as good but need to examine the framing of their articles. Peace won't
come to our planet unless the Outlaw Bully Nation is daily accused for what it is and
does.
NATO is a distinct minority yet it holds the world captive in a terroristic manner. It's
well past time to stop groveling and kow-towing and to stand-up and call out the bullshitters
for what they are since being nice isn't getting us anywhere.
To go back to a previous BTL discussion on Patrick Cockburns recent article in
Counterpunch, Bidens missteps so early on are a very worrying indicator that his foreign
policy team is worse than just being malign. They are incompetent. Thats a very dangerous
combination.
I don't think the Russians, Chinese, or most other major countries (apart from Europe) had
a fundamental problem with Trumps approach. They understood him, and were quite happy to
ignore his bombast and threats and focus instead on what was happening in the real world. But
things are different for someone like Biden, and I'm very surprised nobody in his team seem
to realise this. When he talks on the record, its assumed that it is a reflection of a real
policy. At first, I thought maybe he was just doing the usual new guy in power thing of
talking tough to set the ground for later compromises (the opposite of Obama, who appeared
very weak to other leaders, and then just looked indecisive when his policies turned more
hardline). But that does not seem to be the case so far.
I've no idea what the final outcome will be, but I do think that this is one of those
points in history where things take a very sharp and irreparable change in direction.
Obviously, things have been brewing for years, but the ineptness of US foreign policy seems
to have created a strategic Russian/China alliance which will force many countries to make
some very hard choices about which side of the fence they are on.
On a related note, I woke up this morning to find that a speech by Lawrence P. Wilkerson,
who is associated with the conservative paleoconservatives is getting very wide circulation
in China (you know this has to be officially approved otherwise it disappears very rapidly on
WeChat. He makes a claim that the CIA back in the early '00's intended to use the Uigurs as a
sort of proxy army to destabilise China. For all sorts of reasons, I would doubt that, but it
is now widely believed among Chinese people, even those who have no liking for the CCP. The
notion that the Uigurs are a sort of third force within China, and as such need to be
destroyed now seems to be very deeply embedded in Chinese thinking, and the interference by
'official' western NGO's are undoubtedly making things much worse for them.
"[Wilkerson] makes a claim that the CIA back in the early '00's intended to use the Uigurs
as a sort of proxy army to destabilise China. For all sorts of reasons, I would doubt that,
but it is now widely believed among Chinese people, even those who have no liking for the
CCP."
Just curious as to what your reasons would be for doubting this. The CIA has been doing
precisely this all over the world for over 70 years. There is a clear pipeline between the
Uighurs in China and the CIA-supported "rebels" in Syria. The expatriate Uighur organizations
that are integral to the Western propaganda apparatus is supported and amplified by the NED
and other CIA fronts, as your last sentence implies. This is not to deny the historical
Uighur desire for autonomy in Western China, nor to defend Chinese policies toward them.
Rather, it is to acknowledge the CIA's use of ethnic tensions to sow chaos and division in
non-conforming nations *everywhere*.
1. The US has had little to no success in its many attempts to establish an intelligence
foothold in China. There is zero evidence, direct or indirect, that it has had any successful
contact with Uigur groups directly, although contacts via others, such as the Pakistani or
Turkish intelligence agencies are possible. If there was even the tiniest amount of evidence
of such a link, the Chinese would be broadcasting it from the skies, and not just
re-messaging out tired CT stuff. Chinese intelligence is far ahead of the US in that region,
so they would certainly know if something like that was happening.
2. Uigur groups in general such as we know about them tend to be as virulently anti
Western as anti Han Chinese. All evidence suggests that the brand of Islam that has been
belatedly introduced into those regions is essentially second hand Wahhabism (traditionally,
they were never all that religious).
3. Any such attempt could be easily countered by China – simply by dumping Uigur
radicals into Afghanistan to bolster the Taliban, or anywhere else that would create trouble.
The fact that they haven't done this strongly suggests that the Chinese themselves see no
link.
4. US military intelligence is often a misnomer, but even the CIA can't be stupid enough
to think that fostering another islamic state on the borders of Afghanistan is anything but a
terrible idea.
Of course, no doubt some mid ranking CIA officer may have circulated some report saying
more or less 'hey, maybe we can use those Uighurs or whatever they are called'. But thats an
entirely different thing from suggesting that there have been active links and a strategy for
using them to destabilise the borders of China. The reality is that the US has been entirely
unsuccessful in any attempts (when they've been made) to undermine China via internal Chinese
ethnic or religious groups.
Incidentally, the reliability of Wilkerson (who I actually quite like and who says some
interesting things), on that topic can be measured by his statement that the invasion of
Afghanistan was motivated by an attempt to stop the Belt and Road Initiative. It's quite
impressive intelligence if that was the case as the invasion predated the Belt and Road
Initiative by more than a decade.
Yes, I think the important point is your last one. It's not out of the question that on a
rainy afternoon in Virginia some junior CIA analyst amused himself by sketching out such an
idea, and one day the product may leak and be presented as "proof." But for the reasons you
give, the political leaders who would have to approve the scheme would turn it down, even if
it were physically possible. I doubt it would be, actually: from what little information is
publicly available, the US seems to be having little or no luck penetrating that area.
Thanks for the systematic reply. I appreciate each of your points, and pretty much agree
with the first one – including your comment about Turkish intelligence. But regarding
the others, the fact that we are talking about anti-Western Wahabist radicals does not mean
the CIA (or elements of the CIA or other military/intelligence operations) would hesitate to
weaponize them if possible. We did this in Afghanistan, Bosina, Kosovo, Iraq, Syria, Libya,
Chechnya etc. Indeed, we seemed to *welcome* the fostering of an Islamic State in Eastern
Syria, because the various jihadists were a means to destroy the Syrian government. When the
goal is to foster chaos and destruction in order to *undermine* an existing state, the
calculus of unleashing the head-choppers is different than if we were actually interested in
fostering stability in the region. I admit that such a strategy might sound insane to *us*,
but Einstein's definition of insanity seems to rule our National Security Establishment.
Not PK, but I would suggest these cases are not only different from each other, but also
different from the Uigurs. Essentially, there was a war going on in all of these cases, and
the US (and they were scarcely the only ones) decided to try to get a bit of influence by
arming one or more of the factions. This is a tactic which is as old as arms themselves, and
has a pretty spotty record of success, if that. Its advantage is that it is low-key and
doesn't require a massive presence (the classic case is the Soviet Union and the Chinese
flooding Africa with AK-47s and copies in the 1960s and 1970s). But the cases you mention are
very disparate. In Bosnia there do seem to have been some (illegal) CIA deliveries to the
Muslims in violation of the embargo, but these were very small scale and in any event the
Muslims were one of the major parties to the conflict, as well as constituting the de facto
government in Sarajevo, because the other ethnicities had withdrawn. Likewise, and in spite
of preening memoirs and films, the US influence in Afghanistan was quite small : the
mujahideen were already forming in the 1970s, and the only contribution the US really made
was to supply anti-aircraft missiles, which complicated the Russians' existence quite a bit.
But actually fomenting and arming an insurgency next to one of the three or four major powers
on the planet, with highly skilled intelligence services? There is stupidity and there's
downright insanity.
I the 1950s, the CIA and MI6 trained and armed the "Forest Brothers" in the Baltics.
Neutral Sweden and Finland were across hundreds of km of water. Land access was through
Soviet territory or satellites. There was no significant international trade or commerce in
the area at the time. Yet they had tens of thousands of well supplied (for that era)
resistance fighters that took a decade for the USSR to stomp out.
To suggest that today's CIA is incapable of stirring things up in a well-connected
Xinjiang when thousands of foreigners travel there, tons of business shipments and
international flights and road transport is a mystifying statement. Particularly after CIA's
decades of experience managing jihadis all across North Africa, Mideast and Central Asia,
more than a few being Uigurs.
And suggesting that the only thing the US supplied the Afghan jihadis were Stinger
missiles is far off the mark. It was a multi-billion dollar per year operation conducted by
the US with collaboration of the ISI and Saudis. All those tens of thousands of jihadis
didn't arrive by camels and make slingshots.
I agree "There is stupidity and there's downright insanity" in fomenting troubles in
Xinjiang. The US has already passed that test. Many times.
We are three generations past the 1950s. Not a relevant example.
The US is not even remotely as good as you'd have to believe to accept this theory. For
starters, we don't begin to have enough people with native level language competence, much
the less willing to live there long enough to be trusted. They'll take our arms, but our
directives?
It is in the interest of the CIA to take credit for all sorts of things where their role
was non-existent to marginal because funding.
I can't claim any great knowledge or insight into the region, but the notion that the
Uighurs were part of a grand CIA strategy, or that they have had sufficient influence in the
region to manipulate them into opposing China, just doesn't pass the smell test.
Unfortunately, like the notion that Covid is spread on frozen food, so far as I can tell it
is now considered 'a fact' by most Chinese, inside and outside the country. As a result, even
Chinese who strongly dislike their government are not at all bothered by reports coming out
of the region.
For what its worth, I knew an English guy who lived for a few years in Urumqi with his
Chinese wife about 15 years ago. He was virulently anti-muslim and didn't much like the
non-Chinese locals he met, but I remember at the time that said that what he saw around him
convinced him that things were going to end very badly for the Uighurs, the Chinese were just
waiting for the opportunity to wipe them out. I was in Tibet at that period (I was fortunate
to get a visa on the last year solo traveller were allowed in) and witnessed the way Tibetans
were openly abused on the street by Chinese soldiers. Even Tibetans said that the Uighurs got
it worse.
The US government and privately motivated US citizens have no credibility on this issue.
That means if anyone is going to raise it, it will have to be someone other than America or
Americans.
That doesn't change the fact of Great Han Lebensraum genocide-policy against the Uighurs
on the part of the Chinese Communazi Party. And Chinese statements about their Lebensraum
genocide against Uighuria are just as much hasbara as Israeli statements about
antiPalestinianitic persecution in the Occupied West Bank.
And if that purely-private opinion of a mere U S citizen makes any Great Han hasbarists (
or might I say . . . Hansbarists) on this thread mad, then that makes me happy.
Your friend was English; I have not seen this attitude on the part of Chinese friends or
Chinese I've talked with. I was traveling on a domestic flight in China a number of years ago
and found myself sitting on a plane next to a random Chinese soldier -- a memorably tall,
handsome young man. He spoke English well enough to have a discussion (the relaxed atmosphere
and the need to pass the time does wonders when it comes to breaking down language barriers).
Major Uighur terror attacks and unrest had been in the news (around 2009), so I asked him
what he thought about it. He said that he grew up in Xinjiang. His parents were Han Chinese
who had first come to Xinjiang during the cultural revolution to build some local
infrastructure/improvement project (he described it to me but I don't remember the details).
They saw their goal as improving conditions in the region. Of course, the government wanted
to solidify Chinese presence in that region of their country, but I heard no hint of anger or
derision toward the Uighur. He said he was very concerned that the Uighur people were happy
and he hoped China could find a way to mend the relationship. He said that growing up, there
were many mixed Chinese/Han marriages and that "people say" that mixed Han/Uighur marriages
produced the most physically beautiful children. I didn't see any evidence of the malignant
racism you describe on the part of your English friend.
Strong central governments vs violent separatist movements tend to create lasting
problems. Growing up in a border state over 100 years after our own civil war, I grew up with
the fact that many people had still not let go of that resentment. Southerners still
maintained a sense of grievance back then. The Maryland state song that I learned as a child
is only now being decommissioned by the state legislature. One stanza refers to the "Northern
scum".
This week's WaPo headline: "Maryland poised to say goodbye to state song that celebrates
the Confederacy".
If your Han Chinese interlocutor's feelings are widely shared among the ruled-over rather
than ruling-over ordinary majority of Han citizens, then it would appear that it is the
MonoParty RegimeGovernment ruling over China which is Communazi, not the people as such.
Regardless, it will be up to countrygovs which have moral standing in this area to comment
or not, not the US anymore. At least for now.
Probably the Uighurs have it even worse than Tibetans because Uighuria is very inhabitable
by Han settlers whereas Tibet is high and dry enough that ( I have read), that
lowland-adapted Hans have trouble physically coping over time with the lower oxygen levels at
Tibet altitude.
If that is so, then the High Tibetan Plateau at least would not provide Lebensraum for
millions of Han Settlers in any case, so why clear the Tibetans off the plateau and out of
existence? Not so much need, in Tibet's case.
@PlutoniumKun
I have no knowledge about points 1 to 3, but totally disagree with point 4.
The hubris and desire of the US alphabet agencies to meddle is remarkable. A current example
is the CIA support of jihadis in Syria that the US military itself is fighting against.
Interesting caution re Wilkerson – do you have a link?
Here is a link to an article talking about that talk PK. Having a coupla thousand Uygurs
in Syria gaining combat experience for use later who knows where was probably proof enough
for China of western intentions. Just think of the other Jihadists who have been used in
places like Libya and the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war and the Chinese would be drawing their
own conclusions-
The Georgia GOP secretary of state who bucked Donald Trump is up against serious resistance
within his own party.
..."He's toast," said Jay Williams, a Georgia-based Republican strategist. "I don't know
that there's a single elected official who would put their neck out for Brad Raffensperger
right now."
Not everyone in state political circles is convinced Raffensperger's political plight is so
grim. Some still see a path to reelection, despite the serious resistance within his own
party.
Either way, as the GOP forges its post-Trump era identity, Raffensperger's reelection
campaign is emerging as one of the earliest and most contentious test cases for the direction
of the party.
...Jason Shepherd, the chair of the Republican Party in Cobb County, Georgia, said he has
friends who are "completely uninvolved in politics" who tell him "there is no way they are
going to vote to reelect Raffensperger."
That sentiment, he said, is coming from "the type of person you're almost surprised they
know the name of the secretary of state."
Earlier this week, Rep. Jody Hice, a defender of Trump's effort to overturn the election,
announced he's running with Trump's
endorsement to unseat Raffensperger. And the Georgia Republican Party isn't exactly
sitting on the sidelines.
The state executive committee publicly called this week on Raffensperger to repudiate his staff for misquoting Trump's words in a December phone call in which Trump urged a Georgia
elections official to find "dishonesty" in the vote in an attempt to reverse the election
results.
The party said Raffensperger has "dodged repeated attempts" by committee members to discuss
the issue with him.
Closer to home, Raffensperger failed this past weekend to get Republicans in his own
precinct to elect him as a delegate to his county's upcoming Republican Party convention, said
Stewart Bragg, executive director of the Georgia Republican Party. After Raffensperger wrote a
letter asking to be elected, no one at the precinct meeting moved to nominate him, Bragg
said.
In a statement, the chair of the Fulton County Republican Party, Trey Kelly, said he was
unaware of any letter from Raffensperger, adding that, "like many others who did not attend
Saturday, he was not added to the delegate or alternate list for the county convention." A
person close to Raffensperger also denied that he sent a letter seeking election.
His representatives otherwise declined to comment for this story, pointing to
Raffensperger's past public statements.
Raffensperger's official responsibilities have also been targeted by Republicans in the
state. On Thursday, the Republican-controlled state legislature passed a law, signed by Georgia
GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, that removes the secretary of state as the state election board chair -- to be replaced
by a person approved by the state legislature.
The law, in effect, hands control of the five-person board over to the state legislature:
Two other members on the board are picked by the respective legislative chambers. The law also
gives the state election board the ability to suspend county election officials, who are
replaced by an individual picked by the board.
... ... ...
Raffensperger has joined the chorus of Republicans across the country in opposing H.R. 1, or
the For the People Act, congressional Democrats' sweeping piece of legislation that would
drastically remake most aspects of federal elections, penning an op-ed in USA Today on Friday that says the bill makes "reckless demands
of Georgia's elections system."
At the same time, Raffensperger has been harshly critical of the falsehoods about the 2020
election promoted by Trump and embraced by Hice, saying voters will punish Hice because of
it.
On Dec. 22, Coomer filed a
defamation suit in Denver state court , seeking unspecified damages, against Oltmann and 14
others, including the Trump Campaign; Giuliani; Powell; the One America News Network (OAN); OAN
chief White House correspondent Chanel Rion; Newsmax Media; Newsmax contributor Michelle
Malkin; The Gateway Pundit website; and radio and podcast host Eric Metaxas.
The Russian government is
responding angrily to Biden's derisive comments about Putin:
The Kremlin has reacted angrily to US President Joe Biden's remarks that Russian leader
Vladimir Putin is "a killer," calling the comment unprecedented and describing the
relationship between the two countries as "very bad."
U.S.-Russian relations have been deteriorating steadily over the last ten years, and it
always seemed unlikely that Biden would improve them. Now there will be even less of a chance
that Biden can work constructively with his Russian counterpart. The president's blunt answer
to a rather silly question from George Stephanopoulos has further damaged the relationship to
neither country's benefit. Anatol Lieven
observed recently that this is a "completely unnecessary confrontation with Russia" at a
time when the U.S. needs Russian cooperation on some important issues. Lieven cites U.S.
reentry into the JCPOA and extricating U.S. forces from Afghanistan as his examples of issues
where Russian cooperation could be very valuable, but he could have added new negotiations on
future arms control agreements as well. Making progress on any one of these becomes much more
challenging when our president is gratuitously insulting theirs. For an administration that
prides itself on practicing diplomacy, they have a funny way of showing it.
The Joseph Biden administration has named Richard Nephew as its deputy Iran envoy. As the
former principal deputy coordinator of sanctions policy for Barack Obama's State Department,
Nephew took personal credit for depriving Iranians of food, sabotaging their automobile
industry, and driving up unemployment rates.
Nephew has described the destruction of Iran's economy as "a tremendous success," and
lamented during a visit to Russia that food was still plentiful in the country's capital
despite mounting US sanctions.
Nephew's appointment to a senior diplomatic post suggests that rather than immediately
returning to the JCPOA nuclear deal, the Biden administration will finesse sanctions
illegally imposed by Trump to pressure Iran into an onerous, reworked agreement that Tehran
is unlikely to join.
Nephew's "simple framework" for "sanctions to perform their expected function" reads like
a torturer's manual (replace "target state" with "prisoner"):
- identify objectives for the imposition of pain and define the minimum necessary remedial
steps that the target state must take for pain to be removed
- understand as much as possible the nature of the target, including its vulnerabilities,
interests, commitment to whatever it did to prompt sanctions, and readiness to absorb
pain
-develop a strategy to carefully, methodically, and efficiently increase pain on those
areas that are vulnerabilities while avoiding those that are not
-monitor the execution of the strategy and continuously recalibrate its initial assumption
of target state resolve, the efficacy of the pain applied in shattering that resolve, and how
best to improve the strategy
Combatting malign influences in the Americas: OGA (Office of Global Affairs) used
diplomatic relations in the Americas region to mitigate efforts by states, including Cuba,
Venezuela, and Russia, who are working to increase their influence in the region to the
detriment of US safety and security. OGA coordinated with other U.S. government agencies to
strengthen diplomatic ties and offer technical and humanitarian assistance to dissuade
countries in the region from accepting aid from these ill intentioned states. Examples
include using OGA's Health Attaché office to persuade Brazil to reject the Russian
COVID-19 vaccine, and offering CDC technical assistance in lieu of Panama accepting an offer
of Cuban doctors.
Blinken, like his boss, is a complete moron. He blew it with his patronising threatening
'rules based order' drivel because he has no expertise. Blinken has been doing this for a
decade or two: Syria, Libya, Turkey, Afghanistan, Iran, and on and on. He has the form of a
killer, the mind of a killer and the intentions of a mass murderer. He has proven the latter
and is the type of global ambassadorial psychopath that one should meet with once and then
never meet again.
The USA has lost its mind and every day that passes proves that point.
This bar deserves broader analysis of other quarters of the planet and no more references
to the Guardian or NYT.
Biden under pressure to tap fewer political ambassadors than Trump, Obama
Donors are growing impatient as Biden delays naming coveted ambassador posts.
I know that the United States and its leaders are determined to maintain certain relations
with us, but on matters that are of interest to the United States and on its terms. Even
though they believe we are just like them, we are different. We have a different genetic,
cultural and moral code. But we know how to uphold our interests. We will work with the
United States, but in the areas that we are interested in and on terms that we believe are
beneficial to us. They will have to reckon with it despite their attempts to stop our
development, despite the sanctions and insults. They will have to reckon with this.
The author provides basic but essential definition of conflict resolution. The USians either
don't understand or defy it.
Your link to statement by Blinken & Sullivan is propaganda as you say. It is also an
expression of how deeply limited and very stupid these two are. They have no idea what just
hit them.
"... I'm surprised Republicans haven't done as much to sink the Libertarian Party. ..."
"... The Ballot Marking Devices section in essence legalizes election theft.) ..."
"... The dems carried AZ and PA AFTER they got the Greens removed from the ballot in both states. It tells you all you need to know about the Democratic Party and "free elections". ..."
H.R.1 (the " For the People Act ") is the
enormous election law reform bill just passed by the House and sent to the Senate. (The PDF has
791 pages.)
Black Agenda Report describes the 2019 version as "a sleazy ghetto ice cream truckload of
empty promises."
Associated Press uses more measured language:
House Resolution 1, which touches on virtually every aspect of the electoral process, was
approved on a near party-line 220-210 vote. It would restrict partisan gerrymandering of
congressional districts, strike down hurdles to voting and bring transparency to a murky
campaign finance system that allows wealthy donors to anonymously bankroll political
causes.
The stakes in the outcome are monumental, cutting to the foundational idea that one person
equals one vote, and carrying with it the potential to shape election outcomes for years to
come. It also offers a test of how hard President Joe Biden and his party are willing to
fight for their priorities, as well as those of their voters.
This bill "will put a stop at the voter suppression that we're seeing debated right now,"
said Rep. Nikema Williams, a new congresswoman who represents the Georgia district that
deceased voting rights champion John Lewis held for years. "This bill is the 'Good Trouble'
he fought for his entire life."
To Republicans, however, it would give license to unwanted federal interference in states'
authority to conduct their own elections -- ultimately benefiting Democrats through higher
turnout, most notably among minorities.
Establish automatic voter registration at an array of state agencies; Establish same-day
voter registration; Allow online voter registration; Allow 16- and 17-year-olds to
pre-register so they'll be on the rolls when they turn 18; Allow state colleges and
universities to serve as registration agencies; Ban states from purging eligible voters'
registration simply for infrequent voting; Establish two weeks of in-person early voting,
including availability on Sundays and outside of normal business hours; Standardize hours
within states for opening and closing polling places on Election Day, with exceptions to let
cities set longer hours in municipal races; Require paper ballots filled by hand or machines
that use them as official records and let voters verify their choices; Grant funds to states
to upgrade their election security infrastructure; Provide prepaid postage on mail ballots;
Allow voters to turn in their mail ballot in person if they choose; Allow voters to track
their absentee mail ballots; Require states to establish nonpartisan redistricting
commissions for congressional redistricting (possibly not until the 2030s round of
redistricting); Establish nonpartisan redistricting criteria such as a partisan fairness
provision that courts can enforce starting immediately no matter what institution is drawing
the maps; End prison gerrymandering by counting prisoners at their last address (rather than
where they're incarcerated) for the purposes of redistricting; End felony disenfranchisement
for those on parole, probation, or post-sentence, and require such citizens to be supplied
with registration forms and informed their voting rights have been restored; Provide public
financing for House campaigns in the form of matching small donations at a six-for-one rate;
Expand campaign finance disclosure requirements to mitigate Citizens United ; Ban
corporations from spending for campaign purposes unless the corporation has established a
process for determining the political will of its shareholders; and Make it a crime to
mislead voters with the intention of preventing them from voting.
There's certainly a lot of good stuff here (though as readers know, I loathe early voting,
since it can only increase voting for Party, not candidate, and would prefer a system that
maximized in-person voting, with Election Day a national holiday, and hand-marked paper ballots
hand-counted in public. But I recognize this is an outlier's position). Whether the bill will
pass is, of course, another matter, given the
filibuster . In fact, the bill (
as BAR points out ) seems designed to have its various sections lifted out and turned into
standalone bills. From
Axios :
Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21 and a longtime proponent of campaign finance
reform, says Democrats have a 3 -- 5 year strategy for enacting the key elements of H.R. 1
.
So, we'll see. In this post, I will focus on concerns more familiar to NC readers: H.R.1's
shocking[1] legitimation of the Washington Post's McCarthyite PropOrNot debacle; its
institutionalization of Ballot Marking Devices (which are not the same as "hand-marked paper
ballots"), and its provisions to cripple third party formation and growth. I don't know if
these issues are deal-breakers for anyone, or anyone who matters, but I do know that the
mainstream has not raised them.
Legitimizing PropOrNot
From the
text of the bill , "Subtitle C -- Strengthening Oversight of Online Political Advertising,
SEC. 4203. FINDINGS":
(2) On November 24, 2016, The Washington Post reported findings from teams of independent
researchers that concluded Russians '' exploited American-made technology platforms to
attack U.S. democracy at a particularly vulnerable moment * * * as part of a broadly
effective strategy of sowing distrust in U.S. democracy and its leaders."
Frankly, I'm gobsmacked to find this quotation from WaPo codified as a Congressional Finding
and embodied in statutory language[2]. For those who came in late, I'll unpack my
gobsmackedness, beginning by quoting Craig Timberg's WaPo story, "
Russian propaganda effort helped spread 'fake news' during election, experts say, " which
was oddly[3] placed in the Business Section:
Two teams of independent researchers found that the Russians exploited American-made
technology platforms to attack U.S. democracy at a particularly vulnerable moment , as
an insurgent candidate harnessed a wide range of grievances to claim the White House.
One of those "teams" was PropOrNot:
PropOrNot's monitoring report, which was provided to The Washington Post in advance of its
public release, identifies more than 200 websites as routine peddlers of Russian propaganda
during the election season, with combined audiences of at least 15 million Americans. On
Facebook, PropOrNot estimates that stories planted or promoted by the disinformation campaign
were viewed more than 213 million times.
[A shady website, PropOrNot,] has compiled a blacklist of websites its anonymous authors
accuse of pushing fake news and Russian propaganda. The blacklist includes over 200 outlets,
from the right-wing Drudge Report and Russian government-funded Russia Today, to Wikileaks
and an array of marginal conspiracy and far-right sites. The blacklist also includes
some of the flagship publications of the progressive left, including Truthdig, Counterpunch,
Truthout, Naked Capitalism, and the Black Agenda Report , a leftist African-American
opinion hub that is critical of the liberal black political establishment.
It became apparent soon after that the Post had itself fallen for shoddy information. The
story relied heavily on a report by PropOrNot, an anonymous internet group that bills itself
as "Your Friendly Neighborhood Propaganda Identification Service, Since 2016!" While its
study claimed to show how a deliberate Russian effort had unduly influenced American public
opinion, it included in its calculations non-fake, left-wing sites like Naked Capitalism and
Truthdig, among others.
A number of those sites have objected to being included on PropOrNot's list, and some of
the sites, as well as others not on the list, have publicly challenged the group's
methodology and conclusions. The Post, which did not name any of the sites, does not
itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot's findings regarding any individual media outlet,
nor did the article purport to do so [wowsers]. Since publication of The Post's story,
PropOrNot has removed some sites from its list.
So the story was . what? Some goons made a list the Post won't vouch for? Swell reporting
standards there[4]. You can't spell "McCarthy" without including " Marty ," I guess. And there the matter rested,
just one of those stupidities that our famously free press routinely emits. One might have
supposed it forgotten. Until the story appeared in the text of a bill House Democrats
passed!
(I) The voting system shall require the use of an individual, durable, voter-verified
paper ballot of the voter's vote that shall be marked and made available for inspection and
verification by the voter before the voter's vote is cast and counted, and which shall be
counted by hand or read by an optical character recognition device or other counting device.
For purposes of this subclause, the term 'individual, durable, voter-verified paper ballot'
means a paper ballot marked by the voter by hand or a paper ballot marked through the
use of a nontabulating ballot marking device or system , so long as the voter shall
have the option to mark his or her ballot by hand.
This language is extremely broken. Hand-marked paper ballot advocate Jenny Cohn suggests a
revision:
Los Angeles County's horrid VSAP system uses QR codes (
discussed at length here ). Here is why QR codes are both unauditable and (if the ballot
marking devices are hacked) enable election fraud by insiders:
Voter makes selections on touch-screen (software, hence buggy and insecure), selections
are stored (ditto) and printed out (ditto) on a page with a human-readable receipt reflecting
(one assumes) the touchscreen selections, and the ballot itself, which is the QR code, which
is not human-readable. The page is then scanned (ditto) and QR code is then tabulated
(ditto). The sleight of hand is, of course, the ballot itself. A human may think that their
reciept, which they can read to check that it matches what they selected on the touch screen,
also matches the QR code, which they cannot. But there's no reason on earth to think that!
And the unreadable QR code, since that is what is tabulated, is the ballot! Take the matter
out of the delusional digital realm. Suppose voting worked like this: You voted by
hand-marking a yellow paper ballot. You then handed the yellow paper ballot to an official
who, behind a screen so you could not see, marked a blue ballot that you could not read,
sealed it so you could not read it, and then handed the blue ballot back to you and told you
to put it in the ballot box, that's your vote. Does that make any sense? That is how a
"Ballot Marking Device" works.
In essence, ballots printed out by Ballot Marking Devices are not hand-marked ; the
digital (i.e., the hackable) interposes itself at every point: At the touchscreen, at the
printer, at the reader. And because the printed-out QR code is what is counted, the QR code
is the ballot . And since the QR code is not human-readable, voting is not transparent to
the slightest degree.[5] (The VSAP post describes many other problems with ballot marking
devices, but this is the most important.)
H.R. 1 contains a poison pill designed to reduce political competition and voter choice by
weakening minor parties, at exactly a time where, according to a recent Gallup poll,
support
for a third party is at an all-time high .
Ever since then-presidential candidate Barack Obama shunned the federal public
matching funds program in 2008 , among all parties' general election candidates, only
Green Party presidential nominees have applied for and qualified for these funds. H.R. 1
would solve this minor party/Green Party "problem" by raising the threshold to qualify for
matching funds beyond the realistic ability of Greens (and other minor party nominees) to
reach.
This move to disempower minor parties and their voters is cloaked within the promise of a
new and improved matching funds program, designed to entice major party candidates to opt
into the program, with the promise of substantially increased funding.
The current donation threshold to qualify for a 1:1 match is to raise at least $5,000 in
each of at least 20 states, in donations no larger than $250 each. The public already
supports funding minor party candidates under this formula. Green candidates Jill Stein
(2012, 2016) and Howie Hawkins (2020) each qualified for matching funds in the last three
cycles.
The new H.R. 1 threshold would replace the existing 1:1 match program with a 6:1 match,
but would
simultaneously increase the minimum amount of donations by 500% to a minimum of $25,000
in each of 20 states. It would also increase the minimum number of contributions to reach it
by 625%, by subtlety lowering the size of donations that can count toward reaching the
threshold from $250 to $200. This would make it even harder on minor party candidates -- who
are mostly excluded from candidate forums and media coverage and have a far smaller base of
well-funded donors to draw from -- by disqualifying 20% of the $250 donations they are able
to raise.
The real-world effect of eliminating the existing 1:1 threshold would be to eliminate a
matching funds threshold that is demonstrably reachable by minor party candidates and replace
it with a category reachable likely only by top-tier major party candidates. This
sleight-of-hand will lead people to think Democrats are for increased public funding, but
apparently only for themselves.
I was part of Jill Stein's campaign team in 2015-2016, and I can tell you we barely met
the old threshold in about 22 states. It was a near thing. Eliminating those federal matching
funds for a Green Party presidential campaign would mean all but certain erasure of the Green
Party from the ballot in a good dozen or more states for 2020, and maybe a dozen more in
2022. Since most states also require a presidential and/or US Senate nominee to appear at the
top of the ballot, HR 1 would prohibit the Green Party from running any local candidates in
states where a defunded Green Party's vote drops below a certain level, and it will plummet
if Green campaigns, which which accept no funding from corporations will be far less able to
hire staff or contractors and to perform the necessary functions of a campaign.
Hard to believe that Democrats would do such a thing deliberately, but here we are.
Conclusion
So these are the three flaws that I can see in H.R.1. Whether these flaws should be
sufficient to sink the bill, I don't know. Readers?
NOTES
[1] It does not speak well of our national security goons that this material still lives in
their institutional memory.
[2] A foreshadowing of RussiaGate, perhaps. It turns out that anonymous sources don't need a
layer of indirection, like a shady website. You can just quote them, and nobody calls you on
it.
[3] Timberg's story dropped on Thanksgiving Eve. We were told at the time by sources in a
position to know that his piece made it into the paper without being vetted by the national
security desk at which he once worked, which led to some fiery internal email exchanges at
WaPo.
[4] On the begrudging and sluggishly inserted Editor's Note, CJR
commented :
[T]he editor's note vaults into verbal gymnastics in an attempt to simultaneously
rationalize and distance itself from an obviously flawed primary source. Any data analysis is
only as good as the sum of its parts, and it's clear that PropOrNot's methodology was
lacking.
The Post, of course, was merely reporting what PropOrNot said. Yet it used declarative
language throughout, sans caveat, lending credence to a largely unknown organization that
lumps together independent left-wing publications and legitimately Russian-backed news
services. The Post diminished its credibility at a time when media credibility is in short
supply, and the non-apologetic editor's note doesn't help.
A Post spokeswoman declined to comment further on the episode, saying that the editor's
note speaks for itself.
Indeed!
[5] The hacker's exploit would make it so the human readable part of the ballot read as if
the voter voted for candidate A; but the QR code, that which, being tabulated, is the actual
ballot, would be for candidate B, or whatever else the hacker wanted it to be, like a spoiled
ballot.
I'm surprised Republicans haven't done as much to sink the Libertarian Party.
They can't really do that at this point. One effect of Obama and the Dems' criminal
complicity with Wall Street after the 2008 GFC was the Tea Party's rise as a reaction to that,
which in turn enabled Charles Koch -- a libertarian, NOT a Republican -- to pour money into
supporting Tea Party candidates.
As a result, Koch may effectively have a hold on a majority of the competent political
operators in the Republican party now. Thus, when Trump won in 2016, he was compelled to hire
people straight out of the Koch machine -- Pence, Kellyanne Conway, Pompeo, McCarthy, and
approximately 60 percent or more of the Trump administration's rank and file have CVs directly
attaching them to the Kochtopus if you investigate (and whenever an old-school Republican left,
the Koch people would move one of their one into that position as, forex, when Pompeo replaced
Tillerson).
One presumes Trump was too stupid to have figured this out. Anyway, Koch overall now has a
more sophisticated political machine than the Republican party as a whole. It's easy to assume
Charles Koch is some kind of standard evil capitalist Richie Rich born with a silver spoon in
his mouth. In fact, he's highly intelligent with two MIT master's engineering degrees, one in
nuclear and one in chemical engineering, and his companies were among the first American
companies to integrate computers into their operations back in the 1970s. Thus, when you heard
all the squawking about Cambridge Analytica, and the Mercers and Steve Bannon subverting
democracy, the reality is that Koch has operated an electoral data-collection and targeting
company called i360 doing all the things Cambridge Analytica was accused of for the last decade
and a half. It's far more sophisticated than anything the Republican Party has in-house and the
Koch machine uses it to support candidates it approves of even at a loss.
Why don't you hear about this and how does Koch get away with it? Because, again, he's a
libertarian, not a Republican, and thus the Koch machine gives money to Democratic politicians
and organizations, too.
So what happens with an undeniable win of an unapproved party happens? Will the reformers of
the correct "losing party" just accept it?
Also, seeing the security state's apparatchiks in Congress, along with the Nevada Democratic
Party's pettifactors and pettifoggers, and the national nomenklatura or high priests with their
following of fanatical believers concerned citizens doing a good job is heart
warming.
Finally seeing competent ruling in action is good; we must keep those unwashed
proles along with the displaced disposables in their proper places.
I am in awe of the Democratic Party physical congress of the American people during
the last forty years. Why, they are almost as good as the Republicans.
> I guess I just don't understand the urgency, here.
The urgency is Republican efforts at the state level, most (all?) of which have the effect
of making it harder to vote and restricting the franchise. It's all pretty bad, but it's
possible that H.R.1 could make it worse. (The Ballot Marking Devices section in essence
legalizes election theft.)
The dems carried AZ and PA AFTER they got the Greens removed from the ballot in both states.
It tells you all you need to know about the Democratic Party and "free elections".
Just another political party trying to get a leg up on the other one. Nothing to see
here.
Some outlets in the designated free-speech zone bleachers on the farther side of the stadium
have taken notice of this year's statement; from the nearer side, not so much yet that I've
seen. But here's hoping. And thanks to NC for coming straight at this fraud repeatedly. (Thanks
too for knocking the props out from under the PropOrNot provision.)
" Since most states also require a presidential and/or US Senate nominee to appear at the
top of the ballot, HR 1 would prohibit the Green Party from running any local candidates in
states where a defunded Green Party's vote drops below a certain level, " I don't believe that
that claim is correct. It is certainly not true in Massachusetts (where I am a former
Libertarian State Party Chair) and does not match my knowledge of New York, New Hampshire, or
California.
The Libertarian Party Presidential candidate has almost always ignored Federal campaign
funds for the nominating campaign. The last LP campaign to take Federal nominating funds
appears to have lost money on the deal. The Libertarian Party has repeatedly had a Presidential
candidate on the ballot in every state, thanks to the efforts of its donors and volunteers.
The Green Party's difficulty (and the difficulty faced by the third Third Party, the
Constitution Party, which appears to have been forgotten here) is that it is small, a third or
a half the size of the Libertarian Party, and therefore lacks the resources it needs. It does
not help the Greens that they have sometimes worried about causing the Democratic Presidential
candidate to lose. Libertarians as a group do not have this concern. While the other two major
parties are not the same, neither of them is viewed by Libertarians as being desirable people
to hold office.
The analogy presented about BMDs is not very apt, for two reasons:
1. If both the human-readable receipt and the QR code are scanned, this provides
after-the-fact auditability. 2. Although QR codes aren't human-readable, they're very easily readable by a personal device
that everyone carries around in their pocket. This provides in-the-moment auditability, with
unpredictable, distributed auditors.
The combination of those two factors make life extremely difficult for any attacker: if even
one person happens to check that their QR code matches their receipt and discovers it doesn't,
it's going to trigger an audit of the entire system, and the attack will be discovered.
The analogous system described, with the sealed blue ballot, provides no in-the-moment
auditability, and if we are to assume that the yellow ballot is thrown away, no after-the-fact
auditability.
There is no requirement that what you see when you scan the QR code will make any sense to
the voter. A bunch of race/candidate code pairs not necessarily in an order compatible with the
paper ballot and perhaps encrypted
"Ban corporations from spending for campaign purposes unless the corporation has established
a process for determining the political will of its shareholders"
So it's ok for a corporation to donate if it's shareholders approve. Do the donations have
to mirror the political will of the shareholders? Is a simple majority sufficient? What if it
has two-class share structure?
That's before getting to the two big issue: firstly, the tax advantage of making campaign
(or any political donation) through a corporation as I can't deduct a contribution, but I'm
pretty sure that a corporation can. In addition and more importantly, what about all of the
other stakeholders?
Why not simply prohibit any campaign contributions from corporations?
I can see it now -- Corporation X asks its shareholders to support political donations to
candidate Y. You as a shareholder must confirm your support or the C Suite might have to find
something else to do with all that cash that was going to be distributed as dividends. And if
you fail to mail in your proxy at all, they'll just take that as tacit agreement of
support.
Did every Democrat in Congress just write down their favorite wish and they collected them
all into a single bill? Do they actually want it to pass the Senate? Surely they don't
all want some controls on corporate campaign spending!
We do need national standards for some of those bullet points that enable voters and help
make machine voting more secure. That would be difficult enough without all the other baggage
in the bill.
Maybe there will be a deal in the Senate -- Democrats get to use their excuses for losing in
2016 to suppress third parties and dissenting views, and Republicans use theirs in 2020 to
suppress the voters.
If a bill does pass would be interesting to understand which pieces they cared about enough
to make severable from the whole before the lawsuits start.
In any case, they really need to pass the voting rights bill HR 4/S 4263 to restore the full
protections of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, before we get mired in some "3-5 year strategy" for
HR 1.
A duopoly of power exists in the electoral-legislative-executive industrial complex.
Anything that stifles outside competition is a feature, not a bug.
Don't overlook this clause: " so long as the voter shall have the option to mark his or her
ballot by hand."
That means BMDs exist only along side of current hand marking, never in place of hand
marking. Most voters will mark by hand so few BMDs will be purchased, likely only one per
precinct. That will cause a waiting line for the BMD and result in its non-use by any voter
capable of making direct marks by hand.
The ability to steal an election with QR codes via BMDs will be so remote that it won't be
worth the trouble to attempt it.
Do you not remember the issues with provisional ballots in the Democrat primaries? Having
the "option" to hand mark a ballot doesn't mean it will be easy to exercise that option, and in
fact you may be outright lied to by the volunteers running the polling booth and told you don't
have that option.
I have always known the Republican party to be disegenuous in the extreme, untrustworthy and
authoritarian. I long thought Dems to be milquetoast anodyne. Since 2015 however I have come to
be even more opposed to the Dem party than the Republican party, this HR 1 being an example of
how they have become authoritarian in the extreme while hiding behind preening moral
superiority.
I have been wondering too though, with the spate of election reform bills in Republican
controlled states, why I have not heard any calls to outlaw Dominion and the like?
Clearly both parties want to "fix" the system in their (nefarious) favor.
With the spate of election reform bills in Republican controlled states, why I have not heard
any calls to outlaw Dominion and the like? Clearly both parties want to "fix" the system in their
(nefarious) favor.
The analogy presented about BMDs is not very apt, for two reasons:
1. If both the human-readable receipt and the QR code are scanned, this provides
after-the-fact auditability.
2. Although QR codes aren't human-readable, they're very easily readable by a personal
device that everyone carries around in their pocket. This provides in-the-moment
auditability, with unpredictable, distributed auditors.
The combination of those two factors make life extremely difficult for any attacker: if
even one person happens to check that their QR code matches their receipt and discovers it
doesn't, it's going to trigger an audit of the entire system, and the attack will be
discovered.
The analogous system described, with the sealed blue ballot, provides no in-the-moment
auditability, and if we are to assume that the yellow ballot is thrown away, no
after-the-fact auditability.
There is no requirement that what you see when you scan the QR code will make any sense
to the voter. A bunch of race/candidate code pairs not necessarily in an order compatible with
the paper ballot and perhaps encrypted
It would be good to get rid of electronic voting machines.
I like paper ballots. It might not really do anything to discourage corporate influence to
simply ask the corporations to represent all of the politics of their employees. That is a
murky requirement at best. But it is (citizen's united) currently a blatant form of
gerrymandering.
Most of this is just paper trail stuff, however the real election theft seems to happen
long before the ballots are even printed. How did we get a clearly senile president? He was
the chosen candidate in a "party" process that is not the least bit answerable to the general
electorate. Or even to its own electorate.
What better example of election malpractice is there than Joe Biden? So, obviously, the
national committees of the opposing political parties need some restrictions here. They could
be subjected to tighter regulation.
Their influence could be diluted by allowing many more political parties to participate in
both primary and general elections. We need regulations that promote transparency on all the
sausage-making before a party candidate is chosen. We also need transparency on the king
makers, whether corporate or political.
Who is backing the candidate? HR1 doesn't really scratch the surface. It basically just
encourages people to get out and participate in a very corrupted institution.
A duopoly of power exists in the electoral-legislative-executive industrial complex.
Anything that stifles outside competition is a feature, not a bug.
Don't overlook this clause: "so long as the voter shall have the option to mark his or her
ballot by hand."
That means BMDs exist only along side of current hand marking, never in place of hand
marking. Most voters will mark by hand so few BMDs will be purchased, likely only one per
precinct. That will cause a waiting line for the BMD and result in its non-use by any voter
capable of making direct marks by hand.
The ability to steal an election with QR codes via BMDs will be so remote that it won't be
worth the trouble to attempt it.
Do you not remember the issues with provisional ballots in the Democrat primaries? Having
the "option" to hand mark a ballot doesn't mean it will be easy to exercise that option, and in
fact you may be outright lied to by the volunteers running the polling booth and told you don't
have that option.
I have always known the Republican party to be disingenuous in the extreme, untrustworthy
and authoritarian. I long thought Dems to be milquetoast anodyne. Since 2015 however I have
come to be even more opposed to the Dem party than the Republican party, this HR 1 being an
example of how they have become authoritarian in the extreme while hiding behind preening moral
superiority.
I have been wondering too though, with the spate of election reform bills in Republican
controlled states, why I have not heard any calls to outlaw Dominion and the like? Clearly both
parties want to "fix" the system in their (nefarious) favor.
Both parties seem intent on delegitimizing the U.S. electoral processes. I sense growing
unrest and discontent with our political processes and government. The myth of free elections
is an important pressure relief for venting popular discontent. I believe the actions of our
Elite are becoming increasingly arrogant and imprudent.
So the Dems want greater voter participation but only if they are the beneficiaries.
Beware of Greeks bearing gifts.
The Duopoly is the real flaw in our system as some of us see it. What good is greater
public involvement if the public only has two corrupt choices? It's still a rigged game.
"America is back" claimed Joe Biden to no ones amusement. But the world has changed
after four years of Trump and after a pandemic upset the world. The U.S. position in this
world and its role in it have thereby also changed. To just claim one is back without
adopting to the new situation promises failure.
As candidate Joe Biden promised that there would be no changes.
Former Vice President Joe Biden assured rich donors at a ritzy New York fundraiser that
"nothing would fundamentally change" if he is elected.
Biden told donors at an event at the Carlyle Hotel in Manhattan on Tuesday evening
that he would not "demonize" the rich and promised that " no one's standard of living
will change, nothing would fundamentally change ," Bloomberg News reported.
That Biden statement destroyed the illusion of those who had hoped that he would lift
the standard of living for the average Amercian.
Biden stayed true to his words at the fundraiser. There will be no rise in the minimum
wage. The $2,000 checks he promised to all voters will now be only $1,400 checks. They will
also be
heavily means tested . Those who made more than $80,000 in 2019 but lost their income
in 2020 will get no check at all.
Even as they hold the White House and the House and Senate majorities the Democrats are
unable or unwilling to deliver basic progress. This will likely cost them their House
majority in 2022 and the presidency in 2024.
Biden's "nothing will fundamentally change" attitude extends into foreign policy.
Secretary Pompeo @SecPompeo - 0:29 UTC · Dec 21,
2019
Today, the #ICC prosecutor raised serious questions about the ICC's jurisdiction to
investigate #Israel. Israel is not a state party to the ICC. We firmly oppose this
unjustified inquiry that unfairly targets Israel . The path to lasting peace is through
direct negotiations.
---
Secretary Antony Blinken @SecBlinken - 1:34 UTC · Mar 4,
2021
The United States firmly opposes an @IntlCrimCourt investigation into the Palestinian
Situation. We will continue to uphold our strong commitment to Israel and its security,
including by opposing actions that seek to target Israel unfairly.
That nothing will change is also expressed in two policy papers the Biden administration
released yesterday. The early emphasis on human rights, which distinguished it from the
Trump administration, is already gone.
The common theme is now 'democracy' as if that were not just a form of government but a
value in itself.
The White House published an Interim National
Security Strategic Guidance (pdf). The paper is dripping with ideological LGBTQWERTY
librulism. Its central claim is that 'democracy' is under threat:
At a time when the need for American engagement and international cooperation is greater
than ever, however, democracies across the globe, including our own, are increasingly
under siege . Free societies have been challenged from within by corruption, inequality,
polarization, populism, and illiberal threats to the rule of law. Nationalist and
nativist trends – accelerated by the COVID-19 crisis – produce an
every-country-for-itself mentality that leaves us all more isolated, less prosperous, and
less safe. Democratic nations are also increasingly challenged from outside by
antagonistic authoritarian powers. Anti-democratic forces use misinformation,
disinformation, and weaponized corruption to exploit perceived weaknesses and sow
division within and among free nations, erode existing international rules, and promote
alternative models of authoritarian governance. Reversing these trends is essential to
our national security .
It then singles out China:
We must also contend with the reality that the distribution of power across the world is
changing, creating new threats. China , in particular, has rapidly become more assertive.
It is the only competitor potentially capable of combining its economic, diplomatic,
military, and technological power to mount a sustained challenge to a stable and open
international system. Russia remains determined to enhance its global influence and play
a disruptive role on the world stage. Both Beijing and Moscow have invested heavily in
efforts meant to check U.S. strengths and prevent us from defending our interests and
allies around the world. Regional actors like Iran and North Korea continue to pursue
game-changing capabilities and technologies, while threatening U.S. allies and partners
and challenging regional stability. We also face challenges within countries whose
governance is fragile, and from influential non-state actors that have the ability to
disrupt American interests.
To fight China the U.S. will (ab)use its allies:
We can do none of this work alone. For that reason, we will reinvigorate and modernize
our alliances and partnerships around the world. For decades, our allies have stood by
our side against common threats and adversaries, and worked hand-in-hand to advance our
shared interests and values. They are a tremendous source of strength and a unique
American advantage, helping to shoulder the responsibilities required to keep our nation
safe and our people prosperous. Our democratic alliances enable us to present a common
front, produce a unified vision, and pool our strength to promote high standards,
establish effective international rules, and hold countries like China to account.
Good luck with that. Neither the European U.S. allies, nor the Asian ones, have any
interest in following the U.S. into a confrontation with China. It is their greatest
trading partner and they do not perceive it as an ideological or security threat.
The more we and other democracies can show the world that we can deliver, not only for
our people, but also for each other, the more we can refute the lie that authoritarian
countries love to tell, that theirs is the better way to meet people's fundamental needs
and hopes. It's on us to prove them wrong.
So the question isn't if we will support democracy around the world, but how.
We will use the power of our example. We will encourage others to make key reforms,
overturn bad laws, fight corruption, and stop unjust practices. We will incentivize
democratic behavior.
But we will not promote democracy through costly military interventions or by
attempting to overthrow authoritarian regimes by force. We have tried these tactics in
the past. However well intentioned, they haven't worked. They've given democracy
promotion a bad name, and they've lost the confidence of the American people. We will do
things differently.
The "lie that authoritarian countries love to tell, that their's is the better way to
meet people's fundamental needs and hopes" is targeted at China. But that China did and
does much better than the U.S. to meet its people's needs and hope is not a lie. The
pandemic has again demonstrated that.
The last quoted paragraph has seen some positive attention on social media. But it is
based on a falsehood. The U.S. has not once used military means to 'promote democracy'. Not
ever. It has used war to gain markets and power, to destroy its competition. The
neo-conservatives have claimed to be motivated by 'democracy promotion'. But that was
always just a pretext to hide the real reasons for waging war. Iraq became democratic not
because the U.S. wanted it to be that. In fact, after invading Iraq the the U.S. pro-consul
Paul Bremer tried to prevent universal elections in Iraq. Only the insistence of Ayatollah
Sistani on a universal vote led to a somewhat democratic system in Iraq.
Blinken is, just like Pompeo before him, focused on China:
And eighth, we will manage the biggest geopolitical test of the 21st century: our
relationship with China.
Several countries present us with serious challenges, including Russia, Iran, North
Korea. And there are serious crises we have to deal with, including in Yemen, Ethiopia,
and Burma.
But the challenge posed by China is different. China is the only country with the
economic, diplomatic, military, and technological power to seriously challenge the stable
and open international system – all the rules, values, and relationships that make
the world work the way we want it to , because it ultimately serves the interests and
reflects the values of the American people.
That there is no change from the Trump to the Biden administration in hostility to China
is disappointing only for those who had expected some:
Pang Zhongying, a specialist in international relations at Ocean University of China,
said Beijing would be disappointed with the Biden administration's approach to "continue
and even elevate" the tough policies of the Trump era and to strengthen alliances to deal
with China.
"There does not seem to be any change yet in the serious tensions in China-US
relations," he said. "I think there may be some frustration in Beijing that after more
than 40 days [of the new administration] they have not seen any change but there is
actually more pressure from the US."
Beijing will manage the conflict and it is likely to see it as a chance.
The U.S. failure to adopt to new circumstances will accelerate its demise. The U.S.
empire was a historical abnormality and its twilight is near
:
[The Realist professors of International Relations David Blagden and Patrick Porter]
observe America's "position as 'global leader' is premised on a set of impermanent and
atypical conditions from an earlier post-war era", but " the days of incontestable
unipolarity are over, and cannot be wished back ". The result is that "overextension
abroad, exhaustion and fiscal strain at home, and political disorder feed off one another
in a downward spiral, cumulatively threatening the survival of the republic".
The US empire is, then, at an impasse. Its moral and political justification of
overseeing a global order of universal liberal democracy -- the closest real-world
equivalent to the Kantian perpetual peace that has both motivated and eluded liberal
idealists for the past two centuries -- is now beyond its capabilities to maintain.
...
How does this end for America? Biden and the presidents after him will be forced to make
a hard choice: whether to retrench to a smaller and more manageable empire, or to risk a
far greater and more dramatic collapse in defence of global hegemony.
Biden has made his choice. Nothing will fundamentally change under him. He is thereby
likely to repeat all of Trump's foreign policy failures. There will be no new JCPOA with
Iran nor will there be any win for the U.S. in the Middle East. North Korea will continue
to test bombs and missiles. The U.S. will continue to be stuck in Afghanistan. The
Chinese-Russian alliance will strengthen. U.S. allies will further distance themselves from
it.
We can not yet know what, at what point will cause the collapse of U.S. hegemony. But we
are coming more near to it.
Posted by b on March 4, 2021 at 18:04 UTC |
Permalink
Frankly, Biden's speech to the grand poobahs sounded more like a plea for understanding
than a promise, and if you take what the policy paper says at face value it suggests that
"Biden" understands that we have to change to compete. It is also an admission that they
have presided over a period of decline in Uncle Sugar land, so of course they don't want to
dwell on that. I think Biden is worried the "owners" wom't let him do anything.
And it is totally appropriate that Biden is the guy up there trying to deal with this
mess, because he as one of the prime intigators or the present situation, going back 40
years.
Patrick Porter's book, The False Promise of Liberal Order, is good.
But, his realist critique of vulgar liberal propaganda for US imperialism doesn't locate
the source or material roots of US grand strategy.
Realist theory understands power, hegemony and balancing only in terms of military
power. That is the only currency of power in realist thinking, because realism rests on a
state centricity which insists on the autonomy of the state from any social or economic
factors. Military power is thus all that remains.
This theory obviously fails to explain the real history of US foreign policy, which has
used militarism and other tools in support of strategic economic interests on a global
scale, primarily in the South. The military balance of power is by and large only an
expression of the economic balance of power and the class interests of ruling classes
derived from it.
Porter and other realists point out the contradictions of liberal theory and practice
but fail to provide a scientific explanation for consistent US policies.
There is a partnership currently but it's not yet an alliance. The rationale for one is
very strong. Russia needs China or it will be overwhelmed by a hostile US and fairly
hostile Europe. China needs Russia to save it from a resource embargo by US and allies.
Together they will form a huge power bloc in Eurasia combining their respective territories
with joint influence over Central Asia. Other countries in Asia like South Korea, Vietnam
and India will see bloc and decide to stay neutral or side with the China-Russia bloc.
As compelling as this vision is it hasn't happened yet. It takes time sure but there
must be reluctance from within the countries and other challenges. Which side is dragging
its feet more? It would be interesting to understand why things aren't moving faster.
As compelling as this vision is it hasn't happened yet. It takes time sure but there
must be reluctance from within the countries and other challenges. Which side is dragging
its feet more? It would be interesting to understand why things aren't moving
faster.
Posted by: dsfco | Mar 4 2021 18:54 utc | 4
A guess: PRC having vastly greater economic power thinks its share of influence should
be greater. Russia having vastly superior military power & technology, disagrees. For
example the Chinese government might like access to the most advanced Russian military
technology; the Russians having been invaded many times from both East & West, probably
take the long view.
This week the Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a confirmation hearing for Wendy Sherman, nominated by the Biden
White House to serve as deputy secretary of state.
The career diplomat answered the usual questions on how she views United States posture toward American rivals and official
enemies like Russia, China, and Iran. Once again it was Sen. Rand Paul who had the most direct pushback and biting
criticism against an administration that seems bent on returning to the foreign adventurism and unilateral military
interventionism of the Obama and Bush years.
"We've gone to a liberal form of John Bolton,"
Paul said of President Biden
during his turn to question Sherman. Paul is especially outraged over Biden's Syria strike without consulting Congress last
week.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/8HanUqh_-CE
During the above exchange with Wendy Sherman, Paul in his concluding remarks had blasted away at Biden's vision of the
world, citing past failed Democratic-led military interventions in places like Libya, Yemen, and Syria.
"I think we've gone to a liberal form of John Bolton with your new boss and that's
something I'm really concerned with,"
Paul said.
"All I will say is that
we're bombing now again in Syria without Congressional
approval and we're sending more convoys in there without Congressional approval
. It's a messy war - it's been
going on forever, there's nothing good that's going to come out of our involvement," Paul explained in his statement.
"People say
'well US lives are at risk'
...
yeah
because we put'em there
. We put them in the middle of a civil war that's largely over but can continue if we
keep putting troops into there... to put our troops as a 'trip wire' to get involved in a further escalation of this war."
And that's when the Republican Senator from Kentucky blasted President Biden on his Syria stance and general
interventionist foreign policy:
"I hope that we'll be sane voices and I hope that you'll be one of those," he said addressing Sherman.
"But I don't have a great deal of confidence that we've actually gone away from John Bolton,
I've
think we've gone to a liberal form of John Bolton with your new boss, and that's something I'm very concerned with
."
Sherman in response had tried to claim that the Biden admin is not trying to get more deeply involved in the Syria
conflict, but maintained the 'countering ISIS' stance that the Pentagon has used for years to argue it must continue the
occupation of the northeast portion of the country.
Richard J. Daley, also known as King Richard I, ran the most honest elections Chicago has
ever had. Which is not saying much. Prior to Richard the basic system was City Hall told ward
bosses what the numbers would be night before, ward bosses passed orders to precincts.
Precincts did as told. It was notorious that African American precincts always turned out big
numbers for the machine even though polling places never opened the doors.
I could tell quite a few stories about my own adventures in voting in Chicago in more
recent years. Main reason to vote was until very recently a voters receipt was good for a
free drink at many taverns. Also the precinct captain often kept track of who showed and who
neglected to show. Only the truly delusory ever believed in an honest count. In 1960 there
would have been few places in US where anyone expected an honest count. And fewer where that
expectation came to pass.
President Trump was decisively beaten, if not fair and square. The hopes of millions of
American voters were squashed and extinguished. The saga of the Orange Man is over. The victors
used a gambit: they sacrificed the sanctity and security of the Capitol, allowed intruders in,
permitted them to take selfies in the Speaker's office, and then faked horror and outrage. The
attempted calls for electoral transparency were deflated in real time as huge crowds were
dispersed, electors were confirmed, and the ascendancy of Biden was assured, while Trump
followers were branded 'domestic terrorists'.
Donald Trump denounced the people whom he personally called to protest. His close political
allies withdrew their support. Within hours, or even minutes, this ruler of the world admired
by millions became a non-person. Like a boy who posted an obscenity, he was banned by Twitter
and Facebook. Time will tell whether he will go to prison, as so many Dems pray for, but his
political life seems to have ended, even if his cause may live.
Four people were arrested in
Texas
last
month on 150 counts of voter fraud dating back to the 2018 Medina County Primary Election,
according to reports.
The Texas attorney general's Election Fraud Unit on Feb. 11 arrested Medina County Justice of the Peace Tomas Ramirez, and
earlier detained Leonor Rivas Garza, Eva Ann Martinez and Mary Balderrama on election fraud allegations, News4SA reported.
According to a
release
from
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's office,
the case involved allegations of vote
harvesting at assisted living centers in Medina County in the 2018 Medina County Primary Election.
Ramirez faces one count of organized election fraud, one count of assisting voter voting ballot by mail, and 17 counts of
unlawful possession of a ballot or ballot envelope, according to the news outlet.
Balderrama is charged with one count of organized election fraud, nine counts of illegal voting, two counts of unlawful
possession of ballot or ballot envelope, one count of mail ballot application, two counts of unlawfully assisting voter
voting by mail, two counts of tampering with government record, and eight counts of election fraud.
Garza faces a single count of organized election fraud, two counts of illegal voting, eight counts of unlawful possession
of a ballot or ballot envelope, two counts of election fraud and four counts of fraudulent use of an absentee ballot by
mail.
Martinez is charged with a single count of organized election fraud, nine counts of illegal voting, 28 counts of unlawful
possession of ballot or ballot envelope, three counts of purportedly acting as an agent, five counts of tampering with
government record, 14 counts of election fraud, and four counts of fraudulent mail ballot application,
according
to News4SA
.
The Texas attorney general's office didn't immediately respond to a request for comment by The Epoch Times.
In a separate incident, Raquel Rodriguez, a Texas woman who bragged about being able
to deliver thousands of votes for tens of thousands in cash was arrested in January on charges including election fraud and
illegal voting.
Rodriguez
was
filmed
during an undercover project by Project Veritas,
an investigative journalism nonprofit. She was
recorded in footage released last year that she could deliver "at least 5,000" votes "county-wide" for $55,000 in cash and
that it would hire her "entire team." She acknowledged what she was discussing could land her prison time.
Based on the footage, Paxton, a Republican, opened an investigation. That probe led to the arrest, Paxton announced on Jan.
13.
Rodriguez faces a prison sentence of up to 20 years if convicted.
The
high courts claimed that Trumps cases had no validity. But yet they refuse to see things like this.
Corruption...corruption..corruption in the high courts.
BarneyFife714
7 minutes ago
Can't we just all agree please that voting our way out of tyranny is a pipe dream now?
KekistanisUnite
10 minutes ago
Alright how about some arrests in AZ, GA, MI, NV, PA, WI?
Biden has been a major disappointment for those who hoped that he'd change course
regarding America's pathological involvement in overseas conflicts
Who hoped that? He didn't run on such a platform. "Engagement with the world" and a
"restoration of the pre-Trump era" was his platform. Don't ask me why but this made him
more popular. He was literally the VP in the most interventionist Presidency in US
history.
... People like Giraldi sometimes seem like plants put in place to discredit
anti-interventionism by trying to make it synonymous with anti-semitism.
In the late 1980s, Rannie Amiri, an independent commentator on political affairs, challenged
then-Senator Joe Biden on his stance toward the Israel-Palestine conflict following a campus
speech that Biden gave, asking him:
Rather than succumb to the influence of various lobbying groups in Washington, such as
AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee -- which promotes the views of Israel's
right-wing Likud Party], and the untold amount of money they use to dictate policy,
wouldn't it be more prudent to examine the real effects that collective punishment, daily
humiliation, and countless civilian casualties inflicted by the Israelis have on an
occupied population, and use that understanding to formulate a more rational approach
toward the Palestinians?
Here is Biden response to that:
At the end of the exchange, Biden turned, put his arm around Amiri's shoulder, and
addressed the audience.
If this was not such a fine, articulate, and sincere young man, and he implied that my
vote had been bought, I would give him a swift kick in the ass.
The audience roared in applause, and Amiri sat back down to his chair defeated.
However, a friend rose up to defend him, telling Biden: "If my father heard you say such a
thing, I believe he would have done the same to you first."
The tribal stupidity of the people who support Israel first is beyond words. Who would
think in the 20th and the 21th century we would be led by primitive thinking of tribal
fantasies from thousands of year ago?
Most of the us in the west did not know that this has been going on for so long since we
have been deluded with the term "free press" to describe our press in the west. We are slowly
waking up to reality with some "freedom" here and there on the internet like this site.
So, Biden has been a major disappointment for those who expected that he might change
course regarding America's pathological involvement in overseas conflicts while also having
the good sense and courage to make relations with countries like Iran and Israel responsive
to actual U.S. interests.
You're giving the morons way too much credit, Sir. It's doubtful even 5% of voters know or
care about geopolitics, and probably less than 1% who voted based on fraudsident biden's
foreign policies.
For 5 years it was nonstop Trump-hatred from the ((( lügenpresse ))) even as Trump
did weasel jared's bidding. Stevie Fking Wonder could see the election was rigged.
The USA is kaput, the supreme joke spineless
The ((( Underminers ))) are a c ** t-hair away from total control.
The Free United States must part ways with the devils in DC. Texas, Florida,
Oklahoma, the Dakotas and Montana for starters.
Ralph
Nader poses tough questions for Pelosi about her complete bungling of the Impeachment
Trial--twice! The message IMO is there's to be no law enforcement when it comes to High
Crimes committed by the POTUS, for much of what Trump's guilty of Obama and Biden are as
well--and in several cases far worse since they committed thousands of Capital Crimes.
"Yes, the Republican Party may be entering a period of contention or civil war, but if
the 'show trial' showed anything, it demonstrated again the hold that Trump has over the
party base. The trial might well have consolidated that hold if anything – even if some
old-style conservatives depart a metamorphosised GOP, in search of a more peaceful and civil
anchorage. McConnell's conservative contingent seems, in retrospect, to emerge as the
ephemeral element, rather than a key pivot around which a new GOP might form.
Yet Biden, in many ways, is in the politically weaker position. His party is less than
homogenous – it is a more conflicted bunch. Many of its components simply detest each
other. The Clinton-Obama neoliberal wing is fixated in its belief that they, and the U.S.,
have been on the global side-lines for far too long – and are agog to jump back in.
They are escalating in Afghanistan, in Syria, and preparing a new push in Ukraine. Trump's
troop withdrawals have been all reversed (even for Germany) – and numbers deployed
rather, have been augmented.
In spite of their heady eagerness to lead the world, they are likely to find themselves
banging heads with a changed world. Iran, Russia – even the EU – are not showing
regard to the Biden bugle call: 'America is back'."
America has two Presidents on this day, besides Washington and Lincoln.
One half of the country believes Trump rightfully won.
Yet the events of Jan. 6th still hang like a cloud over Washington.
Critics fault his claims of a stolen election for provoking the protests.
But what if the Democrats really did steal the election? Wouldn't the fault be theirs?
And how can we know whether they really stole it?
Claims of "Massive fraud" on one side vs. "No sign of fraud" on the other -- who is
right?
One thing is crystal clear: Unconstitutional, illegal changes to voting laws generated
millions of irregular ballots -- a hundred times greater than the margin between the
candidates, in some swing states. If the balloting is illegal, there is no way the count can
be correct.
An unconstitutional vote can only produce an unconstitutional result. Everything that
followed -- the certification of the popular vote, the electoral college vote, and the
inauguration -- none of these steps had any legal foundation.
Bad data makes bad decisions. Since Nov. 3, our machinery of government has been spinning off
course on erroneous, unlawful inputs.
The only solution in such cases is to correct the error.
Until runoff elections are held in conformity with the law, we will still have two
Presidents.
Only one of them can be the rightful one.
The optics for the establishment of the Capitol incursion were so horrible I find it hard
to believe it was planned. The photoshop of bed guy that the FBI presented as criminal
evidence doubled down on the humiliation. Honk honk! They can't keep this together for long I
don't think.
@AReply that the Japanese Navy was heading towards Pearl Harbor in December 1941. Well
played, Party* gerontocracy and affiliated corporate elites! That's two wildly successful
covert operations in as many months, the other being the fake election.
3. The massive beat-up of confected hysteria by the media, turning a mildly raucous
event into an 'insurrection' complete with police state witch-hunt of the mainly bumbling
dupes who participated, culminating in yet another show trial of the leftists preferred
scapegoat/scumbag , is to anybody with half a brain, symptomatic of the massively
diseased and terminally cancerous state of the modern JSA.
What crime? The no-warning shot, cowardly point blank murder of Ashli Babbit? The
treasonous mass censorship/public hanging of the First Amendment? Other than those two
atrocities, all I saw was a Tea Party. And it was beautiful.
p.s. The broad wisdom of Gen. Petrov (RIP) is worth some study. for example:
The problem, is that Trump is dirty , has a whole lot of dirty baggage and everyone knows
that Washington's middle name is blackmail or assassin. If he were to ever succeed as a
reformer, he'd have to be ready to commit political and business suicide for the cause
– and he 's not the type. More than 1/2 of America, wanted what he was selling –
but that just turned out to be campaign BS. America is toast unless something really big
happens at the peasant level . What a shame.
Despite the naming of the process as "election", the actual function of the process is the
creation of consent, the belief that so and so is legitimate in custom and law.
Seen objectively, the recent "election" failed. There is no consent. That does not mean
that Mr 10% and his gang or cohort will now go home. It means that they will now use force.
That will work, for a while.
In the longer term, however, regions will invite in the Chinese and Russians, as they have
thousands of tons of gold, functioning industries, and massive resources, and they will pay
the army.
It's collapse. After a time it happens. Empires fall.
I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: "Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown
And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.
And on the pedestal these words appear:
`My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!'
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away".
I love optimism, but I just don't do it. Biden is ruling with EO, and the Supreme Court
made it almost impossible for EOs (unless they're Trumps) to go away. So despite the theater
of a two party system, we are under a corporate dictatorship. Kind of a fascism, except the
corporations and bankers are on top. Gotta a plan for fighting any of that? The GOP is in on
it. As for the Donald, he needs to purge his movement of the Kushners to show he is serious.
Since he won't do that, MAGA is toast.
For the record my suggestion is to go small and take as much independence as you can from
the system. Corporations don't like confederations, which will lead them to demand fed
action. The feds are run by doddering old fossils, inbred bureaucratic aristocrats, silly
woke girls , and not nearly bright as advertised Zionist Jews. I think if we act like our
ancient ancestors, we can work against the feds.
And can the corporations even function without using the government for cheating? I have my
doubts on that. We just need to give up defending the USA , and move on to defend
ourselves.
California's Evidence Code § 1230[3] defines "Declarations against interest" as:
"Evidence of a statement by a declarant having sufficient knowledge of the subject is not
made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness and the
statement, when made, was so far contrary to the declarant's pecuniary or proprietary
interest, or so far subjected him to the risk of civil or criminal liability, or so far
tended to render invalid a claim by him against another, or created such a risk of making him
an object of hatred, ridicule, or social disgrace in the community, that a reasonable man in
his position would not have made the statement unless he believed it to be true."
Now Trump is more powerful than when he was in the White House.
That anybody celebrates that is nuts.
Nitwit narcissistic Donald Trump is a fatally flawed, fatally failed and totally bogus
change agent. What America needs is a genuine change agent with genuine intelligence, genuine
wisdom and genuine integrity. And that ain't Trump.
Even Ann Coulter, one of Trump's earliest high profile supporters sees Trump for what he
really is, a selfish rank opportunist. America will be hosed as long as Trump is the front
for the anti-Status Quo movement.
As a man who doesn't give two shits about Trump and his carpet bagging family that
includes a greasy Jewish Supremacist racist like Jared Kushner and as a man who thinks
"Honest Joe" is just about the sleaziest individual that I have ever laid eyes on lemme say
that it is at least refreshing to see a positive article here.
The reason I enjoy this website and alethonews.com is because at least a reasonable attempt is made
to see through the MSM propaganda. It doesn't mean, however, that dots are sufficiently
connected to see what is actually happening. For example, thinking that Glenn Greenwald is
some beacon of truth instead of a seriously flawed controlled opposition proponent misses the
point dramatically. And not just Greenwald, if you analyze any of the so-called truth tellers
you'll find they won't be willing to discuss the massive mind fuck that is 9/11 or the
Kennedy assassinations. Our government is a one party system is that is broken beyond all
repair. Thinking that is country is winning at all is blind.
US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) may have voted against impeaching Donald Trump,
but he seems open to holding Vice President Kamala Harris to the same standard after the 2022
midterms.
Appearing on 'Fox News Sunday,' Graham railed against the impeachment trial in the Senate,
which ultimately failed, with the 53-47 vote not enough to reach a 'guilty' ruling. He called
it an "affront to the law" and "unconstitutional."
Despite its failure, however, the Trump-supporting Republican says Democrats have "opened
Pandora's Box" and leaders like Harris could pay the price.
"We've opened Pandora's Box to future presidents. And if you use this model, I don't know
how Kamala Harris doesn't get impeached if the Republicans take over the House," he
said.
Harris was brought up multiple times during the impeachment trial for her past promotion of
a bail fund for Black Lives Matter protesters that released rioters who ended up rearrested on
separate criminal charges.
Graham's apparent threat to Harris, mixed with his own disapproval of the standard used to
try and convict Trump for "inciting an insurrection," have many blasting the senator for
hypocrisy, with many also rushing to Harris' defense.
"Well it only works if the impeachee is a Democrat, a woman or Black (in VP Harris' case
she meets all three of Jim Crow Caucus chairman @LindseyGrahamSC's criteria," MSNBC's Joy
Reid tweeted in response to a user
asking how impeaching Harris could be possible.
Others even suggested Republicans taking control of Congress could mean a chance to overturn
election results in 2024.
"Graham is correct about the stakes of the 2022 midterms: If Republicans take Congress,
they could not only impeach Biden and/or Harris (though unlikely they'd have the votes to
convict), they could potentially succeed in overturning the results of the 2024 election,"
former Barack Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau suggested .
Graham also revealed to Fox News that he'd spoken to Trump since the trial ended and
suggested the former president will be actively involved in the Republican Party going
forward.
"I spoke to him last night; he was grateful to his lawyers. He appreciated the help that
all of us provided. You know, he's ready to move on and rebuild the Republican Party," he
said, adding the former president is "excited" for the 2022 midterm elections.
Trump's influence over the Republican Party has been a hotly-debated topic, especially in
light of seven Republican senators voting to impeach on Saturday, and Sen. Mitch McConnell
(R-Kentucky) seemingly turning on his past support and giving a speech on the Senate floor
saying Trump was "responsible" for the January 6 riot at the US Capitol – despite
voting against impeachment – and suggesting he could be pursued in criminal court.
Graham said McConnell's speech could come back to haunt Republicans.
"I think Senator McConnell's speech, he got a load off his chest, obviously, but
unfortunately he put a load on the back of Republicans," he said. "That speech you will
see in 2022 campaigns."
jfc46wv 6 hours ago 14 Feb, 2021 04:13 PM
I don't understand the talk of retaking the house or Senate or winning the presidency in
2024. How is this supposed to happen now that the Dems have masterered the fine art of
controlling the votes?
silvermoon jfc46wv 2 hours ago 14 Feb, 2021 08:12 PM
Another election steal line and obvious while trying to be subtle. You don't even need any
evidence. Of course non has ever been given.
Austin Rock jfc46wv 3 hours ago 14 Feb, 2021 07:20 PM
No, in mid terms, two years from now you will see a swing and a lame duck president for last
three years. I dont think anyonevtruthfully believes their was electoral craud on a scale to
affect result. Trump lost, tough.
Blackace180 5 hours ago 14 Feb, 2021 04:38 PM
The dems took their best shot and failed, but they did loose the dogs of war. What goes
around comes around. Trump was right about a large number of things and the dems will find
out the hard way. Taxes Gas Forever wars Open borders Free trade China virus... See more
Bob Blackace180 2 hours ago 14 Feb, 2021 07:37 PM
sorry to say-the GOP is one with the Democrat party on all these issues Donald Trump was the
ONLY one not playing by the SWAMP playbook.
Blackace180 6 hours ago 14 Feb, 2021 04:22 PM
Impeach the former escort. I say impeach, impeach, impeach. Take her out tonight. It amazes
me the hate they hurled at Trump and then they want unity and actually expect to return to
normal. No, it ain't happening. Impeach.
justliloleme Blackace180 1 hour ago 14 Feb, 2021 08:53 PM
She also encouraged BLM riots that murdered >19 people according to Forbes who expects
that to be a low number They also rioted, spreading covid widely She should have been
arrested when she encouraged that on TV
CarolABinkley Blackace180 2 hours ago 14 Feb, 2021 07:47 PM
In a rather stunning and head-scratchingly self-serving and hyprocritical moment, Leader
McConnell spoke after the Senate acquitted former President Trump and threw him back under the
bus while covering his own political ass.
...
This marks the second time in twelve months that Trump has survived impeachment.
Update (1300ET)
: After a couple of
hours of 'negotiations' during which Sen. Cruz threatened to subpoena Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Trump's lawyers said they
would call "100s of witnesses", a deal has been reached that means no witnesses will be called.
House impeachment managers dropped their request to obtain testimony from
Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler
after senators agreed instead to enter into the record an account of her
secondhand account of a phone call between Trump and House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy.
This agreement has
averted the prospect of an avalanche of requests for testimony
from both sides
that would have extended the impeachment trial beyond its expected conclusion later today (and
perhaps delayed any attempts at reaching a stimulus agreement).
As a reminder, Senator Lindsey Graham, who has been advising Trump's legal team, said that
if
the Senate agrees to the request by House impeachment managers to depose Herrera Beutler, he'll insist on "multiple
witnesses"...starting with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
He said she should be required "to answer the question as to whether or not there was
credible evidence of pre-planned violence before President Trump spoke? Whether Speaker Pelosi, due to optics, refused
requests by the Capitol Hill Police for additional resources like the National Guard?"
* * *
Just when you thought Donald Trump's second impeachment trials was over,
five
Republicans have joined their Democratic colleagues in a Saturday morning vote (55-45) to call witnesses
- an
unexpected development in this snap impeachment over Trump's alleged role inciting the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
GOP Sens. Collins, Graham, Murkowski, Romney and Sasse were the five.
The move - which was originally opposed by several Democrats, will allow them to strengthen their case. It is unclear what
kind of delay this may cause, after impeachment managers and Trump's defense team estimated it would be over on Saturday.
In response to the vote, Trump attorney Michael van der Veen answered that if witnesses are going to be called, "
I'm
going to need more than 100 witnesses
, not just one," adding "we should close this case out today," but if that
doesn't happen, "Do not handcuff me by limiting the number of witnesses I can have."
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren suggested that a debate on the number of witnesses should not take place, saying "I
don't think there's any limit right now, and that's part of what will be debated."
As
Axios
notes,
Trump
himself is Democrats' most desired witness
, however the former president has already quashed that - saying he
would
not
comply willingly
. The Senate could subpoena him, however it's unclear whether they would have enough support.
Instead,
Democrats plan to call GOP
Rep. Jamie
Herrera Butler
of Washington, who the
NY Times
reported on Friday said Trump
'sided with the mob' during a phone call
as the attack was unfolding. Herrera Butler, who voted to impeach Trump
in the House, was requested to testify by House impeachment manager Jamie Raskin.
In a statement on Friday night, Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler, Republican of
Washington, recounted a phone call relayed to her by Mr. McCarthy of California, the minority leader,
in
which Mr. Trump was said to have sided with the rioters, telling the top House Republican that members of the mob who
had stormed the Capitol were "more upset about the election than you are."
She pleaded with witnesses to step forward and share what they knew about Mr. Trump's
actions and statements as the attack was underway. -
NY
Times
"
To the patriots who were standing next to the former president as these
conversations were happening, or even to the former vice president: if you have something to add here, now would be the
time
," said Herrera Beutler in a statement.
According to her account, McCarthy 'frantically' called Trump on Jan. 6 and asked him to "publicly and forcefully call off
the riot," and that Trump replied that it was Antifa, not his supporters, who were responsible. When McCarthy pushed back
saying that wasn't true, Trump allegedly said "Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you
are."
Senate Democrats who initially opposed witnesses include Kristen Gillibrand of NY, who said on Thursday: "We've heard from
many witnesses based on their interviews and their video presentations, so, I feel like we've heard from enough witnesses."
Sen. Angus King of Maine said "I think the case has been made. I don't know what witnesses would add."
Once witnesses have testified
, impeachment managers and Trump's defense
team will present
closing arguments
- with each side allotted two hours. A
full vote on whether to convict or acquit will follow.
To that end, Senate Minority Leader
Mitch McConnell
(R-KY) has told his
fellow Senate GOP in an email that he will
vote to acquit
the former
president - writing "As I have said for some time, today's vote is a vote of conscience and I know we will all treat it as
such," according to
Politico
's Burgess Everett.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/_Iywct0QlRQ
93,114
1,222
NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX
Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.
lay_arrow
Foe Jaws
3 hours ago
McConnell got had by the D Rats and now he is backing out of the bargain they made to fcck over Trump.
Foe Jaws
2 hours ago
Same for Mike Pence. All he had to do was investigate the election fraud and he betrayed every single
Trump voter in America. Pence can burn in hell forever.
Doom Porn Star
2 hours ago
Even IF Trump had been provided with intelligence indicating that fringe organizations were plotting a
violent protest at the Capitol, doesn't the power to call in the National Guard reside with the local DC
mayor Bowser who made the decision to call them up or not during the BLM protests earlier in 2020 and on
the closing night of the Republican convention when Rand Paul was famously swarmed?
Why are assertions this call was suddenly Trump's call to make being entertained at all?
Shouldn't any call for National Guard support have been from the Capitol police to the office of Mayor
Bowser?
Doom Porn Star
2 hours ago
(Edited)
Look at what actually happened all throughout 2020.
Mayor Bowser was the person who called in the National Guard or did not.
Bowser had/has the authority and has used it or not at her discretion:
The first witness the defense should be the Ex-US Capitol Police Chief who already said:
"The entire intelligence community seems to have missed this", ... "I must add that I wish that before
placing the blame on the USCP and on me as the Chief for the breach of the Capitol by an insurrectionist
mob, more consideration would have been given to the impact of incomplete information provided by
intelligence assessments, the denied National Guard request, and the subsequent delayed approval for
National Guard assistance", ... "I still cannot fathom why in the midst of an armed insurrection, which
was broadcast worldwide on television, it took the Department of Defence over three hours to approve an
urgent request for National Guard support"
Doom Porn Star
1 hour ago
(Edited)
remove
link
Exactly WHO had authority to call for the National Guard?
Exactly WHO called for the National Guard?
-Congress may not have the authority to call. -The Capitol police may not either.
-The MSM doesn't have any authority to call the National Guard, or to command troops to act or stand
down.
Exactly WHO did they call and WHO did they speak to?
-There are facts behind all this hysterical rhetoric, newsroom caterwauling, and political puffery.
WHO decided when and which troops to deploy from where?
-Names, rank and serial numbers.
Was DC Mayor Bowser called and what did Mayor Bowser do?
-These questions are all painfully obvious and no one is asking...
SoDamnMad
17 minutes ago
remove
link
I saw a video which I saved which showed, NOT Capitol Police on the barricades of the Capitol but DC
Metropolitan Police. If the Capitol Police are 2300 strong WHERE THE HELL WERE THEY?
holdbuysell
3 hours ago
Witnesses no longer mean anything. They've poisoned this well when they brushed away thousands of
affidavits, signed under the penalty of perjury, citing massive election and voter fraud.
These people have destroyed any semblance of the rule of law.
GodSpeed
3 hours ago
call the BLM activist as a witness and let people see it wasn't just Trump Supporters in the Capitol.
This spectacle of a show trial would make Stalin proud. Now we have a moron old man with Stage 2 dementia
sitting in Oval Office surrounded barbed wire/steel fencing, and 15,000 troops. Think about what America
has devolved into.
GreatUncle
2 hours ago
Can't recall a senator but I think a petition to enable into state law and constitutionally approved in
the state the ability to expel a senator by a vote that is instigated by 20% of the population signing a
petition would be a dam good start.
Reckon it is needed and not just in SC and not just for Republicans neither but for any that break
promises or expose themselves too poor judgement.
So the Democrats may win more seats does it really matter anymore?
It can also restore accountability to the electorate that a fraudulent election may steal.
Twitter censors Oltmann for revealing truth about Coomer,
Dominion
election
fraud
Dominion
,
which is tied to both Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein, appears to have in its upper ranks a diehard
Trump hater who expressed a willingness to do anything possible to prevent Trump from winning reelection.
The news connects the dots between Eric Coomer's actions for
Dominion
Voting
Systems in the U.S., the CIA raid in Frankfurt, Germany to protect
Dominion's
servers
and destroy the evidence of election
fraud
,
and now the actions at Leonardo in Italy. It even ropes in the deep state in the U.S. government.
"We conclude that the
Dominion
Voting
System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic
fraud
and
influence election results," Russell Ramsland Jr.,...
UnicornTears
2 hours ago
(Edited)
Where were all the guns for this alleged 'insurgency' ? Surely in a country with half a billion guns
there would have been one or two in this attempt to 'overthrow the government'? Do you ever ask yourself
why you believe such obvious lies?
boyplunger7777
2 hours ago
remove
link
Rigged elections, rigged markets, state run media, censorship of opposing views, multi-trillion dollar
fiscal deficits, central bank monetizing debt, and now a show trial that would make Stalin proud. This is
America in 2021. Have a plan, things are going to fall apart very quickly from here.
WolfgangIffans101
2 hours ago
I see complicity everywhere, and at all levels. Why would it fall apart quickly from here? The USSR held
together for quite a while, no?
chunga
3 hours ago
It figures a guy like Raskin is the face of this thing. I can't watch this today because yesterday I was
boiling over.
nmewn
2 hours ago
"In a statement on Friday night, Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler, Republican of Washington,
recounted a phone call
relayed
to her by
Mr. McCarthy of California, the minority leader, in which Mr. Trump was said to have
sided with the rioters, telling the top House Republican that members of the mob who had stormed the
Capitol were "more upset about the election than you are."
She's going to testify to receiving
second
hand
information, from McCarthy?
She's going to testify that McCarthy said Trump said that some Americans were "more upset about the
election than you are."...meaning, McCarthy?...mmmkay, besides the Senate's complete lack of
jurisdiction over "trying"
a
private citizen
in
the Legislature
I guess we can add some...
she-said-he-said-that-he-said
...nonsense
for the 80yr old "Supreme Court Justice" Patrick Leahy to wade through, if he can stay awake ;-)
Posa
2 hours ago
Illegitimate? Yes. Five key swing states had no signature checks and validation for millions of mail-in votes.
Doesn't prove fraud; then again, this doesn't prove there was no fraud. It does prove this was not a legitimate
election when so many ballots were indiscriminately cast.
SWRichmond
2 hours ago
(Edited)
remove
link
Trump "publicly and forcefully calling off the riot" would imply, of course, that he was in charge of it,
would it not? Trump asked for the rally, not the riot.
I think he did the right thing by NOT doing that.
the_pencil
2 hours ago
remove
link
If Pelosi is called as a witness, she/they will all be toast. And they know it.
Keep digging your hole, Dems.
Baconeggs
2 hours ago
Must have been trump that ordered the cops to allow everyone into the capitol then right? Maybe we
should have someone investigate that
Aquamaster
2 hours ago
And these clowns in the House, Senate, and the rest of the D.C. swamp
STILL
can't
seem to understand why normal Americans hate them so much.
the_pencil
2 hours ago
"Hate"....is nowhere near strong enough. The whole bunch is pure filth.
cleg
2 hours ago
they have brought it all on themselves
Xena fobe
2 hours ago
They understand. They want to be hated. It means they are getting filthy rich.
Jim in MN
2 hours ago
Here, let me help....
We The People DEMAND TO SEE:
Seth Rich's laptop
Hunter Biden's laptop
Anthony Weiner's laptop
Epstein's tapes
The Soros/DNC riot conspiracy surveillance files
The bioweapon strike files
the_pencil
2 hours ago
remove
link
If Pelosi is called as a witness, she/they will all be toast. And they know it.
Keep digging your hole, Dems.
Baconeggs
2 hours ago
Must have been trump that ordered the cops to allow everyone into the capitol then right? Maybe we
should have someone investigate that
Aquamaster
2 hours ago
And these clowns in the House, Senate, and the rest of the D.C. swamp
STILL
can't
seem to understand why normal Americans hate them so much.
the_pencil
2 hours ago
"Hate"....is nowhere near strong enough. The whole bunch is pure filth.
cleg
2 hours ago
they have brought it all on themselves
Xena fobe
2 hours ago
They understand. They want to be hated. It means they are getting filthy rich.
Jim in MN
2 hours ago
Here, let me help....
We The People DEMAND TO SEE:
Seth Rich's laptop
Hunter Biden's laptop
Anthony Weiner's laptop
Epstein's tapes
The Soros/DNC riot conspiracy surveillance files
The bioweapon strike files
tyberious
4 hours ago
remove
link
Witnesses? To what?
I want hand counted votes and voter ID!
found our POTUS won CO and VA!
chiquita
4 hours ago
This opens the door to calling in Pelosi, Harris, Zuckerberg, and a whole laundry list of people who had
their hands in what happened with the riots and the election fraud. It also means the impeachment
hearing can go on for quite a bit longer, but now a whole lot of information will come out that might
never have been shown to the American public. It's crazy because Trump will still never be convicted,
but if they get out the election fraud information, people will know what happened.
Why they're doing this is to try to make it look like Trump put Pence's life in danger, which is absurd.
No one is going to remember the opening case the demorats presented, nor the boring opening response from
Trump's team, especially his first attorney. All anyone is going to remember is how the demorats were
exposed as lying hypocrites yesterday, and today how they tried undo the damage by gaming their sham to
their advantage. Cheating is all they know, just like their election fraud. But all they did is
actually score the biggest 'own goal' they could to lose in epic fashion, and as a result had to slink off
the field humiliated once again by Trump. This is how their world ends...not with a bang...but with a
whimper. I would love to see how their deranged base is reacting to this. Must be the biggest suicide watch
in history.
USAllDay
32 minutes ago
I am not sure democrats are capable of being humiliated. One must grasp reality and have certain level of
respect to experience the feeling.
Joe Davola
51 minutes ago
(Edited)
Hey Mitch:
How's about prosecuting those who scammed the FISA court and spied on the incoming administration?
Yeah, that's what I thought.
champ2top
1 hour ago
(Edited)
Nancy holds the keys. She knows who sponsored the riots this past summer, she knows who is part of the deep
state, she knows where the dark money comes from, she knows who hired the agent provocateurs who led the
Capitol incursion. The coup and voter fraud are now hidden away unless someone comes forth. We can only hope
someone is brave enough.
Samual Vimes
1 hour ago
She is not alone in that knowledge.
champ2top
1 hour ago
Where are the witnesses? Where is Nancy? The deep state and swamp once again is successful in hiding the
truth from the people. Our government is a sham government. Our media is a sham media. Neither
is representative of the people.
Subsidence
2 hours ago
Meanwhile on main street.... we are losing our jobs, our culture and buried in debt. Our way of life has
been deemed extremist and not compatible with the "new" America. The elites in charge see us as a throwaway
and a useless group of people. We are dying out here and yet our government is more concerned about
appeasing a group of coastal yuppies by placing the former president on a sham trial. They hate us! Its past
sad and getting to the point of pure anger. We are at the breaking point.
hugin-o-munin
43 minutes ago
US elections need to be fully manual and with paper ballots only going forward. The way elections are stolen
using electronic voting machine systems is so obvious and fraudulent that it can't be used any more. Even
with all these sophisticated systems of fraud Biden couldn't win so they had to go full banana and van in
loads of freshly printed fake ballots in the middle of the night and let teams rerun the tabulators many
times to 'win'.
Kina
1 hour ago
Absolutely undoubted the USA
has undergone a total coup by the Global Deep State.
America is now owned and run by a group of international oligarch from various countries, for their own
ideological power purposes.
And people like Lindsay Graham are absolutely traitors to America.
Hard to witness Americans selling out their own country for some global world govt.
"
Insurrection
is a term of art. It's defined in the law
,"
argued Castor. "
It
involves taking over a country, a shadow government, taking the TV stations over and having some plan on what you're going to do
when you finally take power. Clearly this is not that
."
Update (1410ET):
After spending much of
the morning laying out their case for why the impeachment is a sham, former President Trump's legal team proceeded to play
several
montages of Democrats doing the exact same thing they've impeached Trump over
- namely, calling for violence against
Republicans. Interspersed throughout are clips of leftists committing violence against conservatives following the 'incitement.
Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/rhJYHU3ejLc
They also played clips of Democrats
objecting to election results
:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/umsAhEFHFKA
As well as clips of Democrats gunning for a Trump impeachment at all costs:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/cq4GiGTZaKQ
* * *
Watch Live:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/TMeAOM52n2M
* * *
After Democratic impeachment managers spent the last two days dissecting videos and tweets - and in one case
fabricating
evidence
to try and convince the world that former President Trump incited the Jan. 6 Capitol riot,
it's
now time for the defense to counter
.
In what is expected to last just one day,
Trump's impeachment lawyers will reportedly
present a montage of prominent Democrats similarly 'inciting' their base
, as BLM and Antifa extremists spent much of
last year committing violent and destructive crimes throughout the country.
SeaDonkey
6 hours ago
remove
link
You guys
keep reducing it down to democrats versus republicans. Both parties are in bed with each other. Both parties
strike deals with corporations, special interest groups, lobbyists, and any other entity which provides wealth and
power. Dan Crenshaw is the exact same thing as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. His job (like hers) is to attract right
leaning voters which may be disenchanted with contemporary American politicians. He brings the outcasts and the
exiled back to the party while reassuring them that they can trust him- since, he claims to not be 'one of them.'
This country needs to hold ALL politicians accountable and clean house.
That is the only thing they really need to answer.
hugin-o-munin 1 hour ago (Edited)
Do we have any irrefutable evidence that she really was shot and died? I'm mentioning this
because there have been video reviews of what actually happened there and nothing makes sense
unless it was a film op.
Everything wrong with the Capitol Shooting HOAX - Ashley Babbit
The former Capitol Police chief sent a letter to congressional leaders explaining why the
Capitol Police appeared unprepared for the January 6 demonstrations. In the letter, which was
addressed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Steven Sund said the failure to respond to violence
during the demonstrations was largely due to a lack of intelligence on the type of people that
would be there.
Sund, who resigned after the demonstrations, noted he had relied on assessments from the
FBI, Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security when preparing for potential unrest
.
He said three days prior, an internal intelligence assessment showed a number of
extremist groups, including Antifa, were expected to target the Capitol Building and "could
become violent."
That's when Sund detailed a timeline of his many attempts to shore up support and expedite a
mass delivery of protective equipment for his officers. Although 100 riot helmets were
delivered on January 4, Army Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt allegedly told Sund he "did not like the
visual of the National Guard standing in a line with the Capitol in the background."
This came despite several people in the crowd "wearing radio earpieces indicating a high
level of coordination" and "carrying weapons, explosives and climbing gear."
In the letter, Sund recognized that a "number of systems broke down," adding that officials
who violated policies or directives need to be held accountable. He went on to say the National
Guard was far too slow, noting they sent in 150 troops about five-hours after his request for
their support was approved by the Capitol Police Board and called for that process to be
reformed.
On Sunday, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said he truly appreciated Sund's letter and wished more
people would come forward because the American public deserves to know what really happened on
January 6.
The senator added, he's "suspicious" that Democrat leaders knew about the attack and are
using the upcoming impeachment trial as a "diversion tactic."
Here is the site of Matthew DePerno, one the lawyers in the video. He needs financial aid to
keep up the Absolute Truth about the fraudulent 2020 election.
Time
has published an
explainer
piece
offering a fascinating insight into how the presidential election was won. It's titled "The Secret History of the Shadow
Campaign that Saved the 2020 Election."
The fascinating part is what it tells us about the brazenness of the left in general and the corrupt, mendacious MSM in particular:
they are now heavy-hinting that they cheated but want you to know that it's all OK because they were doing it to not to destroy
democracy but to preserve and enhance it.
Here's the key paragraph:
That's why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever
dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to
influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the
election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system's fragility in order to ensure that
democracy in America endures.
Do you see what they just did there?
The Democrats (and their sympathisers) didn't
rig
the
election. They just
fortified
it
by taking care to ensure the right guy won rather than the wrong guy won, regardless of what those pesky voters might misguidedly
have wanted.
Could this have anything to do, you wonder, with President Trump's upcoming impeachment trial?
My suspicion that Time's piece is both pre-emptive strike and damage limitation exercise. It anticipates the possibility that Trump
will provide evidence in support of his claim that the election was "stolen."
This evidence will be much harder to brush under the carpet in the Senate.
I'm reminded here of an old article from the
Times
(of
London), which
described
the
process whereby political projects are advanced by stealth.
It is at first denied that any radical new plan exists; it is then conceded that it exists but ministers swear blind that it is
not even on the political agenda; it is then noted that it might well be on the agenda but is not a serious proposition; it is
later conceded that it is a serious proposition but that it will never be implemented; after that it is acknowledge that it will
be implemented but in such a diluted form that it will make no difference to the lives of ordinary people; at some point it is
finally recognised that it has made such a difference, but it was always known that it would and voters were told so from the
outset.
This is where we are headed now with the"'stolen" election. Columnists who blithely assured us that the election was above board may
now begin to finesse their position.
"OK, so maybe it was rigged," they will start to concede. 'But isn't that always the case with elections? And anyway it's a done
deal now."
Sorry, my bad -- that use of the word "rigged" was a complete slip of the tongue.
What I meant to say is that the presidential election was "fortified." And what's not to like about that, eh?
"Oh say, can you see! By Dawn's early light; a pro-dollar trade; that puts the bears to
flight?" Bloomberg Daybreak this morning boldly states "American exceptionalism is back"
(baby). Apparently better-than-expected data and corporate earnings and the prospects of fiscal
stimulus show the USA is still the global standout after all. As a result, bearish USD trades
touted for the first month of the year need to suddenly be unwound: EUR is now back below 1.20,
AUD is clinging to 0.76, and JPY is past 105.50, while as an EM proxy, MXN is back to 20.38 at
time of writing vs. 19.55 on January 21.
... ... ...
President Biden has called on the military in Myanmar to relinquish power after their recent
coup. What happens when they refuse? A signature criticism of the Obama foreign policy team was
its refusal to match US rhetoric (e.g., "pivot to Asia") with any substantive action (e.g., in
the South China Sea or Syria). The new team gave interviews before assuming office saying they
had learned these lessons. So what options with teeth does the US have for the generals in
Naypidaw to back their demand? Sanctions are meaningless for a group who rarely travel abroad
and whom can look to China for support if needed, despite their coolness towards Beijing to
date.
This underlines the need for any top dog (or cat) to build up a pack (or clowder). Here
again we see problems. Many articles have been written about the new US administration's call
for the EU to stand alongside it to create new global frameworks favourable to the West (and by
extension for USD) and not China (and CNY); and about how the EU is not willing to step up to
that plate because of French exceptionalism and German Merkel-cantilism. Macron now says
the EU should not gang up on China with the US : " This kind of common front against China
risks pushing Beijing to lower its cooperation on issues like combatting climate change, and
exacerbating its aggressive behaviour in Asia, including in the South China Sea, " he says. So
will the US response then have to be Trumpian and EUR negative, like last time? If not, then
what exactly?
Of course, the previous administration had been building bridges to India, which has its own
issues with China. However, this relationship is still in its early stages, and India has
traditionally looked to Russia for muscle, a role Moscow would be happy to play again. In that
regard, the White House backing large anti-government protests in New Delhi against an
agricultural reform programme ostensibly to the US's liking, and criticizing the government for
cutting off the internet to try to disrupt them, is unlikely to help build bridges: indeed,
India has already drawn comparisons to the events of 6 January in the US Capitol, showing the
US is not as exceptional as it likes to project it is. These kind of shifts can matter, even if
this is just one small step on a much longer journey (and USD trend channel).
Meanwhile, the Aussie government (which has also never and will never target house prices,
"just land, bricks, mortar, etc.") might be wondering what the US will help do about a report
that
a Chinese company is planning to build a new city on a Papua New Guinea island near Australia's
northern border . 'New Daru City' allegedly includes an industrial zone, seaport, business
and commercial zone, along with a resort and residential area. Will Canberra regard this as a
market-driven response to the well-known Chinese demand for lifestyle residences in the vibrant
cultural hub that is the PNG hinterland, or as a Bond-villain project to develop a port just
200km from their Northern Territory? The PNG Prime Minister himself says he is "unaware" of
this proposal(!) Yes, this may well not come to pass; but one can again see the paving stones
being prepared for alternative paths for currencies like AUD, USD, and CNY (to say nothing of
PNG's Kina) to travel over the course of the 2020s.
Meanwhile, the US can at least rely on the UK, as usual, where yesterday saw regulators ban
China's CGTN TV news service, and the Telegraph also reports that three Chinese spies posing as
journalists have just been expelled from the country. Somehow, along with the whole BNO
passports issue, this is not likely to help ensure the "golden era" of Sino-British relations
promised under previous UK leadership.
But will it ensure a golden era of Bido-BoJo relations? That is another path as yet
untrod.
Happy Friday! "We love it so much, I think you do too."
The first reason is that the impeachment proceedings aren't a criminal trial, so even
conviction wouldn't establish guilt the way an actual criminal court might. Contrary to what
the public thinks -- with its third grade–level understanding of American politics -- and
what the media is happy to imply, impeachment is strictly a political process that does nothing
more than remove a person from office. The Democrats' new interpretation that impeachment can
be used to bar someone from holding office in the future is a rather novel approach.
Justus_Americans 6 hours ago remove link
Gaslight 1944 Movie both timeless and timely the gaslighting of America in 2021.
Projection, accusing others of what they themselves do. https://youtu.be/sLXlAIVP46c
US Banana Republic 10 hours ago remove link
This "impeachment" is 100% a political move (10 RINOs not withstanding).
It is supported 100% by oligarchical propaganda.
It depends on mass hysteria, with no logic whatsoever.
karzai_luver 16 hours ago remove link
Keep it simple. Just go with whatever John Brennan says you can do.
Don't drone me bro.
Don't want to be branded a Domestic Terrorist or extremist.
Over the last four years, there has been a type of race by politicians and pundits who seek
to outdo each other in the most sensational claims of how Donald Trump could be prosecuted or
impeached on an ever-expanding list of offenses. Each claim is
stated with absolute certainty despite long-standing questions or constitutional barriers.
Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters of California has been a
standout in this crowd -- calling for impeachments and prosecutions from the very beginning of
Trump's term in office. She is now insisting that Trump can and should be charged with
"premeditated murder" over the deadly riots at the U.S. Capitol on Jan.
6th. The statement was made on MSNBC which has trafficked in such ridiculous theories without
any pushback from the media or legal experts.
Waters made her statement in an interview with Joy Reid, who has had one of the most
controversial records in television for her
racially charged language , dubious
legal arguments , and
unsupported claims . Reid notably does not press Waters on her claim that Trump should be
charged with premeditated murder.
Here is the interview:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/l3TfKQYuoDc
In the interview, Reid refers to the 1990s and the "insurrections in Los Angeles." It is not
clear from the interview what constitutes an insurrection in the 1990s but the term "riot"
seems effectively barred today in favor of "insurrection."
When Trump or his allies made outlandish and unsupported claims about the law in the past,
the media piled on with coverage stating that such claims were ridiculous or unfounded. I
regularly called out Trump for such claims, including his call for
changing whole areas of law like defamation. However, equally unsupported claims on the
left are met with little or no push back from hosts or the media.
Waters states "He absolutely should be charged with premeditated murder because of the lives
that were lost for this invasion with his insurrection,. For the President of the United States
to sit and watch the invasion and the insurrection and not say a word because he knew he had
absolutely initiated it – and as some of them said, 'he invited us to come. We're here at
the invitation of the President of the United States."
In Washington, D.C., a person is guilty of first degree murder when he or she specifically
intends to kill another purposely with premeditation and deliberation, or kills while in the
process of committing a felony. See Section 22-2104 . Most states require that
first-degree premeditated murder be proven as a willful, deliberate, premeditated killing. That
is treated as a specific intent crime with the showing of a purposive act or an act with
express malice. You must generally show a specific intent to kill and premeditation is usually
shown by evidence that a defendant reflected on the act or planned for the act of murder.
Waters' home state courts have dealt with this issue recently:
"Murder, whether in the first or second degree, requires malice aforethought. (§
187.) Malice can be express or implied. It is express when there is a manifest intent to kill
(§ 188, subd. (a)(1)); it is implied if someone kills with "no considerable provocation
. . . or when the circumstances attending the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart"
(§ 188, subd. (a)(2)). When a person directly perpetrates a killing, it is the
perpetrator who must possess such malice. People v. Gentile (Riverside County Court December
2020)."
In this case, there is no evidence that Trump directly murdered anyone or sought the death
of anyone. He is being accused of conspiring in the commission of such murders. That sounds
more like a claim of being an aider and abetter to murder. However, even in California where
charges can be based on the the natural and probable consequence of the aided and abetted
crime, courts have balked at such broad interpretations. "Under the natural and probable
consequences doctrine, an accomplice is guilty not only of the offense he or she directly aided
or abetted (i.e., the target offense), but also of any other offense committed by the direct
perpetrator that was the "natural and probable consequence" of the crime the accomplice aided
and abetted (i.e., the nontarget offense)."
This distinction was again recently drawn in California:
"In Chiu, we held that the natural and probable consequences doctrine cannot support a
conviction for first degree premeditated murder. (Chiu, supra, 59 Cal.4th at p. 167.) We
reasoned that in the context of murder, the natural and probable consequences doctrine serves
the purpose of "deterring aiders and abettors from aiding or encouraging the commission of
offenses that would naturally, probably, and foreseeably result in an unlawful killing." (Id.
at p. 165.) But this purpose "loses its force" when an accomplice is held culpable for first
degree premeditated murder under a natural and probable consequences theory. (Id. at p. 166.)
First degree premeditated murder carries significantly higher penalties than second degree
murder and requires the additional mental state that the killing be "willful, deliberate, and
premeditated." PEOPLE v. GENTILE Opinion of the Court by Liu, J. 12 (§ 189, subd. (a);
Chiu, at p. 166.) Whether or not the direct perpetrator killed with premeditation "has no
effect on the resultant harm. The victim has been killed regardless of the perpetrator's
premeditative mental state." (Chiu, at p. 166.) We further concluded that subjecting an
accomplice to enhanced punishment based solely on the "uniquely subjective and personal"
mental state of the direct perpetrator was inconsistent with "reasonable concepts of
culpability." (Chiu, supra, 59 Cal.4th at pp. 166, 165.)"
In her interview, Waters was apparently referencing reports that some of the rioters had
planned in advance to storm the Capitol. On the day of the riot, many of us noted that some of
the rioters clearly brought ropes and other items that indicated preparation to the attack.
Those reports however cut both ways. It certainly shows that those individuals had
premeditation, but it also shows that the speech itself may not have been the incitement for
those individuals. Critics can fairly note that the President had engaged in reckless rhetoric
for weeks. However, there is a difference between reckless and criminal speech. More
importantly, if such comments are now dispositive evidence of premeditation for murder, it
would allow such vicarious charges for homicide in a wide array of cases involving
politicians.
While Waters has defended her long list of impeachable offenses as based on the view that
"impeachment is whatever Congress says it is ," the same is not true of the criminal
code.
I t is a fitting end to four years of Donald Trump in the White House.
On one side, Trump's endless stoking of political grievances -- and claims that November's
presidential election was "stolen" from him -- spilled over into a mob storming the U.S.
Capitol. They did so in the forlorn hope of disrupting the certification process of the
Electoral College vote, which formally declared his opponent, Joe Biden, the winner.
On the other side, the Democratic Party instituted a second, unprecedented
impeachment process in the slightly less forlorn hope of foreclosing any possibility of him
running again in 2024.
Barely concealing its alliance with the then-incoming Biden administration, Silicon Valley
shut down
Trump's social media megaphone. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi lobbied the Joint Chiefs of Staff to
cut an "unhinged" Trump out of the chain of command, in a move that was reportedly rejected
out of hand by Pentagon officials because, they told The New York Times , it would
amount to a "military coup."
And Biden, who boasts that he was the author the Patriot Act years before 9/11, has been
touting
a new "domestic terrorism" bill, as though the U.S. did not already have a plethora of ways to
crack down on dissent, of both the legitimate and the illegitimate varieties.
With that as the backdrop, Washington, D.C.,
designated Biden's inauguration last month a "national special security event."
Authoritarian Tribes
None of this is just the latest sign that the U.S. political system has degenerated into
tawdry theater. It is growing evidence that U.S. politics is devolving into a permanent
confrontation between two authoritarian tribes. Both are convinced that the other side is
un-American, perverting the true republic. Both are unwilling to compromise, believing they
share no common ground. And ultimately both are fighting for a rotten cause.
This is not a divide between ethical and unethical politics. This clash is now a bitter
grudge match. It is civil war by other means. Not only is the chasm between these rival camps
widening, but the real criminals are making off -- as they always do -- with the loot.
Each tribe has been coalescing for a while now around a center of gravity. On the Republican
side that became clear with the emergence of the Tea Party and the birther movement during
President Barack Obama's tenure. But it took Trump's election as president in 2016 to create a
proper oppositional center of gravity on the other side.
Those in the Democratic tribe who now disdain Trump and his supporters for their desperate
refusal to accept November's result overlook how they greeted Trump's victory in 2016. They
struggled against the legitimacy of that outcome too, even if they did not resort to the overt
violence of the mob at the Capitol.
It began with arguments that, while Trump might have won the Electoral College vote, he
lost the popular vote . Four years ago, the Electoral College also faced self-serving
accusations that it had disenfranchised the majority.
The Democratic tribe took to the streets as well, in protest marches in cities across the
U.S. under the banner of the Resistance, denying Trump was their president. That was
understandable, given his personal behavior and the policies he advocated. But it did not end
there.
The disavowal of the Trump presidency quickly regressed into a dangerous narrative -- one
that has never properly gone away, despite the dearth of evidence to support it. The claim was
not only that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win, but that Trump
himself had actively colluded with Russia to steal the election from his opponent, Hillary
Clinton.
Anything that had damaged Clinton -- including emails showing that the Democratic leadership
rigged its own primaries to make sure she was the party's candidate rather than Bernie Sanders
-- got sucked into
that vast conspiracy theory. That included the messenger of these bad tidings: WikiLeaks
and its founder Julian Assange.
For years, the Democratic tribe has invested its considerable energies in fruitless efforts
to prove its theory, including the first bid to remove Trump through an entirely self-defeating
impeachment process.
None of this could be justified politically. It was a Democrat counterpoint to Trump's MAGA
slogan: "Make America Great Again". Democrats promised the much less catchy SAPD: "Save America
from President Deplorable."
For this tribe, Trump was an illegitimate president from the outset, one whose election to
the highest office in the land revealed something unwholesome about their country they
preferred to avert their gaze from because it might implicate them too. Removing Trump largely
eclipsed the struggle to improve the lives of ordinary Americans.
The obsession with Trump above everything else seemingly rationalized any means -- fair or
foul -- to be rid of him. Few thought about how this would look to his supporters or to those
not already safely ensconced in one or other tribe.
To understand, they now need only look to the storming of the Capitol How they felt watching
the building being ransacked -- a Deplorable putting his feet up contemptuously on House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi's desk -- was how Trump's tribe felt watching their president being
denounced as a Russian agent and dragged through impeachment proceedings.
This mood is not likely to dissipate. The two political tribes are locked in an antagonistic
tango, mirroring each other's moves, each other's grudges, each other's sense of victimhood.
Much more unites them than they would ever care to admit.
Festering Culture War
This may be the pathology, but what of the cause.
What we see here is the culmination of a festering culture war stoked by an unhealthy
investment by both sides in a simple-minded and highly divisive identity politics.
Much has correctly been made of the white supremacism of the most loyal sections of Trump's
tribe, and that was on show again during the invasion of the Capitol. The Confederate flag, the
neo-Nazi slogans, the T-shirts extolling the Jewish supremacy of Israel are all indicators of a
toxic politics of white grievance that may be less articulated but is still felt by a wider
swath of Trump's supporting constituency.
This ugly identity politics is rightly rejected by the other tribe, but is nonetheless
mirrored in its equally deep commitment to identity politics. The progressive coalition of
identities at the core of the Democratic Party may be more reassuring to modern sensibilities,
but has served in practice to accentuate to parts of the Trump tribe the supposed threat to
their white identity.
This is not to equate the justified struggle of Black Lives Matter against endemic racism,
including in the police, with the reactionary forces seeking to preserve some notion of white
privilege. It is to simply observe that when the political field of battle exclusively revolves
around identity, then one cannot be surprised if each side continues to frame its struggle in
precisely those terms.
Those who live by the identity sword are likely to die by that same sword.
The Trump tribe want their president, and the Republican Party more generally, to guarantee
a white supremacism they fear is being eroded as the Democrat Party flaunts its progressive,
multicultural credentials. The Democrat tribe, meanwhile, wants to challenge the old order --
and most especially reactionary institutions like local police forces -- that have been an
oppressive bulwark against change.
This dynamic can lead only to permanent confrontation, bitterness and alienation.
Class Struggle
There is a way out of the dead-end culture war that pits one tribe against the other. It is
to formulate an alternative, popular politics based on class struggle -- the 99 percent against
the 1 percent. But neither the Republican nor the Democratic leaderships, or the respective
medias that cheerlead them, has any interest in encouraging a political realignment of this
sort.
The Democratic Party is not a vehicle for class struggle, after all. Like the Republican
Party, it is designed to preserve the privileges of an elite. Its biggest donors, like the
Republicans', are drawn from Wall Street, Silicon Valley, Big Pharma, the arms industries. The
political battle in the United States is between two parties of capital united by far more than
divides them.
The shadow play of U.S. politics is the enervating, antagonistic confrontation of identities
described above. While ordinary Americans get stoked into a mutual tribal loathing by a
corporate media that profits from this theatre of hate, the elite enjoys a free hand to pillage
the planet and the commons.
While we fixate on identities that have been crafted to divide us, while we remain immersed
in the surface of politics, while we are distracted from the real battle lines, those elites
prosper.
Political paralysis may not harm the establishment. But it is profoundly damaging to us, the
99 percent, when our communities are being ravaged by a pandemic, when our economies are in
meltdown, when the planet is on the brink of ecological collapse.
We need a functioning political system that reflects popular priorities, like Medicare For
All, a dignified minimum wage and free college; that understands the urgency of the challenges
posed by multiple crises; and that can marshal and channel our energies into solutions, not
into endless, irresolvable confrontations based on grievances that have been cultivated to
weaken us.
Trump is not the enemy. That target is far too small and limited. The class he belongs to is
our enemy, as is the system of privilege he has spent the past four years upholding and his
successor will defend just as assiduously.
Whether Trump is ultimately convicted or not in the Senate, the system that produced him
will be acquitted -- by Congress, by the new president, by Wall Street, by the corporate
media.
It is we who will pay the price.
Jonathan Cook is a former Guardian journalist (1994-2001) and winner of the Martha
Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. He is a freelance journalist based in Nazareth. If you
appreciate his articles, please consider offering your financial support .
This dude's father (he was adopted) is a retired general.
The embedded video shows him teaching people how to dress in black bloc. Is he behind
bars? Don't make me laff. Also this AP (agent provocateur) was right next to the woman that
was shot dead on Jan. 6.
Black bloc gear is right out of Germany. This guy didn't learn these tactics on his own.
The scary part is that the MSM is ignoring the real history of black bloc, out of Germany,
and how it migrated here to the US.
Fox News is facing a rise of the machines, voting machines that is, as election software
firm Smartmatic is suing the network, three of its anchors and lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Sidney
Powell for allegedly false claims of fraud.
The defamation lawsuit , which was
filed on Thursday in New York state court in Manhattan, seeks $2.7 billion in damages. In
addition to Fox and the two lawyers, Smartmatic names Fox hosts Lou Dobbs, Jeanine Pirro and
Maria Bartiromo as defendants, saying they falsely claimed that the company's technology was
used to help 'steal' the November 3 election from former President Donald Trump.
Florida-based Smartmatic said the defendants knew the election wasn't rigged, "but they
also saw an opportunity to capitalize on President Trump's popularity by inventing a story.
Defendants decided to tell people that the election was stolen from President Trump and Vice
President (Mike) Pence." The company added that "without any true villain, defendants
invented one. Defendants decided to make Smartmatic the villain in their story."
Moreover, Smartmatic said its software was used in just one jurisdiction in the November 3
election – Los Angeles County. Democrat Joe Biden won California by more than 5 million
votes. Trump made allegations of election fraud in decisive swing states where Biden had narrow
margins of victory, such as Georgia, Pennsylvania and Michigan.
How many people were in the TCF Center and is there any validity to the excuse that they
were over the "COVID capacity" – the excuse they used to exclude the Republicans from
watching vote processing
Why did so many Democrat poll workers bring in suitcases ? Did they hide illegal ballots
in them like their colleagues in Georgia?
Were the machines networked? Can we see the modem and the wires networking the tabulating
machines as described by Patrick
Colbeck?
Who brought in what at 3:30/4:00 am, were they ballots as the Republicans have said they
witnessed or was it food/camera equipment as the media claimed? Shane Trejo and Jose Aliaga claim these were ballots.
Was there any security keeping people out of the building who did not have credentials to
get in?
Were there other unexplained ballot dumps past the 8:00 PM deadline for ballots as
several other witnesses have alleged?
Were GOP Poll Challengers being ejected for making good-faith challenges or were they
refusing to wear a mask?
... ... ...
And after our initial review of the TCF security video, we can assure you -- We have
evidence of illicit and likely criminal activity and we have it on video.
On January 19th, the US Senate held confirmation hearings for Joe Biden's Secretary of State
nominee Antony Blinken. Blinken has a reputation on both sides of the aisle for being
exceptionally qualified for the job of America's top diplomat, which is surprising considering
he was on the wrong side of every major foreign policy blunder of the last 20 years ;
Iraq, Libya, and Syria .
When Senator Rand Paul
asked Antony Blinken what lessons he has learned from his disastrous foreign policy record
in Libya and Syria, Blinken replied that after "some hard thinking" he's proud that he has done
"everything we possibly can to make sure that diplomacy is the first answer, not the last
answer, and that war and conflict is our last resort."
Of course war is the last resort. Even the most hawkish war criminals would agree that war
is the last resort. But the question is, war is the last resort to accomplish what? If war is
the last resort to get a country to fully capitulate to Washington's demands then eventually
the US will be at war with everyone. To Blinken, war as the last resort can only be understood
in the same way a mugger considers shooting his victim as a last resort to stealing their
wallet.
Blinken displayed his hubris a few minutes later when he said, "The door should remain open"
for Georgia to join NATO under the justification of curbing Russian aggression .
Rand Paul informed Blinken, "This would be adding Georgia, that's occupied [by Russia], to
NATO. Under Article 5, then we would go to war ."
Senator Paul is right. According to Washington, Russia has been
occupying 20 percent of Georgia since 2008. Under the principle of collective defense in
Article 5 of NATO, the US would be obligated to treat Russia's occupation of the country of
Georgia the same way the US would treat a Russian occupation of the US state of Georgia. That
sounds like a recipe for war. But don't worry, peaceniks, Antony Blinken has assured us that
war is the last resort!
Blinken's framing of the issue exposes his disingenuous approach. Russian aggression is a
term used by Washington insiders to describe a Russian reaction to western aggression. Blinken
knows that the 2008 war between Russia and Georgia was not Russian aggression, he calls it that
because it suits his agenda and the American press is dependably ignorant enough to not ask
questions.
In the 2008 war, Georgia
was the aggressor against the South Ossetians, a people who are ethnically distinct from Georgians, and
who have never --
not even for one day -- considered themselves a part of Georgia. The Ossetians have a
history of Russian
partiality ; they were among the first ethnic groups in the region to join the Russian
Empire in the 19th century and the USSR in the 1920s. Today, ethnic Ossetians straddle both
sides of the current Russian border, and they are more aligned with the Russian government than with the
Georgian government.
When Georgia gained sovereignty from the former Soviet Union in 1991, South Ossetia declared
its independence. In response, Georgian forces invaded South Ossetia, initiating an armed
conflict that killed more than
2,000 people . In 1992, a ceasefire agreement was signed in Sochi between Georgia, Russia
and South Ossetia, which created a
tripartite peacekeeping force led by Russia. Although the international community never
acknowledged South Ossetia's independence, they have enjoyed political autonomy since the 1992
Sochi agreement.
The Sochi agreement held up until Georgia's ultra-nationalist President Mikheil Saakashvili
came to power in the 2003 western-backed
bloodless " Rose
Revolution " coup-d'etat. The pro-western President Saakashvili advocated joining the EU
and NATO, and insisted on asserting Georgian rule over South
Ossetia. U.S. President George Bush
supported the new Georgian president's effort to bring Georgia into NATO, which for Russia
would mean bringing a hostile military up to its border. In 2006, President Saakashvili offered
South Ossetia autonomy in exchange for a political settlement with Georgia. A
referendum was held, and the South Ossetian people overwhelmingly reaffirmed their desire for
independence from Georgia.
In August, 2008, After exchanging artillery fire with South Ossetia,
Georgia invaded South Ossetia's capital city of Tskhinvali, killing
1,400 civilians and
18 Russian peacekeepers . Georgia's attack triggered a Russian invasion into South Ossetia
and Abkhazia (another breakaway region) to restore stability and protect peacekeeping
forces.
Russia is by no means innocent -- they used
disproportionate force attacking targets inside Georgia -- but only a Russophobic shill
would conclude that this war was somehow caused by Russian aggression. The idea that Russia had
no business intervening is laughable. Under the
1992 Sochi agreement , Russia took charge of a peacekeeping coalition to help prevent
exactly the scenario that happened in the summer of 2008.
If George Bush had succeeded in bringing Georgia into NATO, the United States may have been
dragged into war with Russia in 2008. Antony Blinken claims that NATO membership deters Russian
aggression, but does he really believe that Russia would have been deterred from intervening to
protect its own peacekeeping force? Does Blinken believe that Georgia -- backed by the U.S.
military -- would have acted more cautiously in South Ossetia, or is it more likely they would
have been bolder?
It's undeniable that it is in Russia's best interest to have pro-Russian countries on its
borders. But pretending as if Russia is going to march into Tbilisi and reabsorb the entire
country of Georgia into Russia is a level of paranoia that should disqualify anyone from having
an opinion on the subject. The military conflict in Georgia is about the two breakaway regions
and their right to self determination. Russia's self interest happens to align with the wishes
of the people in South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
By supporting Georgia, America -- the champion of democracy and self determination -- has
adopted the position that South Ossetians didn't really mean to repeatedly choose independence
when given the option. This is a situation where America's professed values are diametrically
opposed to its policy of countering Russian influence everywhere on the map.
Antony Blinken should pause to consider if America's policy objectives are worth fighting a
war for. Is it worth confronting Russia in South Ossetia? Was it worth confronting Russia over
Crimea and the Donbas in
Ukraine ? Is it a good idea to withdraw from the INF
Nuclear Treaty and the
Open Skies Treaty ? Should we have spent the last 30 years marching NATO -- a military
alliance hostile to Russia -- right up to the doorsteps of
Russia ? Is any of this really making us safer?
Blinken has bought into his own propaganda. To Blinken, regardless of the stubborn details
of history, every conflict on Russia's border is simply Russian aggression. Washington's
solution is the expansion of NATO, which Russia describes as "
NATO encirclement. " This is an unacceptable military threat to Russia, who has
a deep distrust of western intentions due to a long history of western invasions into Russia.
Antony Blinken still lives in a bipolar world in which the United States and Russia are
existential threats to each other's existence. Every conflict and every alliance is only viewed
through the lens of the New Cold War crusade against Russia. This maniacal crusade could thrust
America in the unthinkable abyss of nuclear war.
Rand Paul got his answer, Antony Blinken learned nothing from all his mistakes! The danger
isn't merely resorting to war too early, the danger is in sticking our noses in conflicts that
we have no business being in. War should be the last resort to defending America's people and
it's homeland from foreign invasion; it should not be the last resort to enforcing America's
utopian vision on the world, and it certainly shouldn't be the last resort to prevent an ethnic
group in the South Caucasus -- that almost no American has ever heard of -- from the right to
self-determination.
Kenny MacDonald is a former Navy SEAL and Afghanistan War veteran. He is currently pursuing
a bachelor's degree in history. Youtube Channel . Medium . Facebook .
It's an hour-and-a-half long, and I just don't have time to listen to it all. It would be
great any readers had to time and the inclination to pick out the highlights and put them in
comments (and if you do, please include time codes).
"AOC on Instagram Live: Recounting Jan. 6 attack details draws more than 160K viewers" [
Staunton News-Leader ]. "[S]he laid out the fact that people knew violence was coming on
Jan. 6. Members of Congress, trying to help her, sent messages as early as the Thursday before
Jan. 6 that they expected bad things to go down as the Congress moved to certify the Electoral
College results of the November election."
The News-Leader is a Gannet paper in the Shenendoah Valley, but they didn't pull the story
from the wires, they had a reporter write it up. The last politician I can remember who
made the story like this was, well Donald Trump.
"Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Opens Up About Trauma in a Moving and Powerful Instagram Live" [
Marie Claire ].
"On Monday night, in a brave and candid video on Instagram Live, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
revealed her deep trauma following the Jan. 6 siege of the Capitol, and the prior traumas that
had made it even more triggering. Ocasio-Cortez shared that she is a survivor of sexual
assault: 'I haven't told many people in my life," she said. She began crying during her
retelling of the events of Jan. 6, but fought to continue to tell her story. 'All of your
traumas can, kind of, intersect and interact,' she explained. Ocasio-Cortez compared
Republicans' insistence on telling her and other survivors of the Jan. 6 attack to 'get over
it' to the tactics used by abusers. She added: 'The folks [false note, there] who
are saying we should move on, we shouldn't have accountability, etc., are saying: 'Can you just
forget about this so that we can do it again?' I'm not going to let it happen to me again and
I'm not going to let it happen to our country."
I have mixed reactions to this. On the one hand the "we should just move on" attitude has
done the country a lot of damage. Obama's version of this was " we need to look forward as
opposed to looking backwards ," and as a direct result Gina Haspel, a torturer, headed the
CIA.
On the other, I would want expert testimony on whether traumas "intersect and interact," and
how they do. On yet another, I'm deeply suspicious of the concept that trauma conveys
authenticity, especially political authenticity. If trauma did convey authenticity, then
PSTD-suffering soldiers would make the best cops. Finally, it's a category error, exactly on
the order of confusing government with a household, to equate personal trauma with political
violence. They may have similar roots (say, deaths of despair), and they may feel the same to
the person experiencing them, but they are products of difference systems.
"AOC: Ocasio-Cortez recalls Capitol raid, calls for accountability" [
Al Jazeera ]. "US Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has described being
terrified for her life during the storming of the US Capitol, doubling down on calls for
Republican politicians to be held accountable.
In an emotional broadcast on Monday night, New York House member Ocasio-Cortez said she was
harassed by those she identified as fans of former President Donald Trump for days before the
January 6 incident and was warned by other members of Congress to be "careful" on the day of
the rally."
To me, it looks like AOC -- a very, very talented politician -- is picking up the power
that's lying in the street. First, the "survivor" rhetoric, like it or not -- I don't; see my
comment above -- speaks directly to the bourgeois feminists of the Clintonite wing of the
Democrat Party. Who else is doing that?
Second, the "accountability" rhetoric speaks directly to the broad (albeit PMC) base that
really wants to stick it to the Republicans, bipartisanship be damned. Who else is doing that?
(The pink pussy hat brigade will, of course, do whatever the leadership tells them to, but
that's their initial, default, setting).
Third, in a party with a weak bench thirsting for non-geriatric leadership, AOC is stepping
forward. Who else is doing that? Finally, speaking directly to her fan base (i.e., one assumes,
voters, ultimately) on Instagram -- as, apparently, she while cooking (!) -- bypasses the press
entirely.
Who else is doing that? Again, one thinks of Trump. I wonder if she does A/B testing?
(There are all sorts of reasons to dislike AOC on policy -- I notices a long time ago she was
saying "working class" a lot less -- but there's no denying her talents as a
politician.)
Really sorry that AOC was scared for her life. Was gonna look it up re how many
politicians have been killed by Americans in the past 100 years but .just too much
energy.
We've all been traumatized.
45,000 Americans.die every year from no insurance.
There is a shorter video by AOC linked in the following tweet and I will say this for her.
She knows how to project an image. In the video you will see the black borders on either
side, a cream background, and AOC dressed in a grayish-black top with her face being the only
colour in this 1:37 min video. If these were not her decisions, then she must have a very
good media advisor-
"'Be ready to fight': FBI probe of U.S. Capitol riot finds evidence detailing coordination
of an assault" [
WaPo ]. "FBI agents around the country are working to unravel the various motives,
relationships, goals and actions of the hundreds of Trump supporters who stormed the U.S.
Capitol on Jan. 6. Some inside the bureau have described the Capitol riot investigation as
their biggest case since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and a top priority of the agents' work
is to determine the extent to which that violence and chaos was preplanned and coordinated."
• And if so,
by whom .
"'Blame Trump' defense from alleged Capitol rioters dovetails with Democrats' impeachment
case" [
CNN ]. "One by one, die-hard supporters of former President Donald Trump are now blaming
him for their actions that day, after being charged by federal prosecutors and facing
possible jail time. A lawyer for one rioter who allegedly attacked police officers with a
baseball bat said he was "inspired" by Trump's incendiary speech at a rally beforehand. The
so-called QAnon shaman, whose horned bearskin headdress made him go viral, now claims he was
"duped" by Trump, his lawyer said. At this point, the statements may be more of a public
relations strategy than an articulated legal defense. But they dovetail with Democrats' case
in favor of impeaching and convicting Trump; they agree that the former president incited the
deadly insurrection that overwhelmed the Capitol on January 6."
"A 2009 warning about right-wing extremism was engulfed by politics. There are signs it's
happening again." [
USA Today ]. "In April 2009, federal intelligence officials issued a prescient warning to
police departments around the country. 'Right-wing extremists will attempt to recruit and
radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from
military training and combat," experts in the Department of Homeland Security wrote. 'These
skills and knowledge have the potential to boost the capabilities of extremists –
including lone wolves or small terrorist cells – to carry out violence.' It was one of
DHS' most explicit mentions of homegrown terrorists since 9/11, one with a direct connection
to the military. But the call to action was effectively buried after powerful Republican
politicians and their allies in the right-wing media launched broadsides against President
Barack Obama's administration and Democrats , alleging that they had disrespected the
men and women in the U.S. military while attempting to surveil and silence conservatives. The
blowback shifted the debate away from how to actually address the threat and into another
partisan public spectacle." • Translating, the Democrats -- assuming good faith -- were
weak. Yet another 2009 debacle from Obama.
"How to fix our domestic terrorist problem" [ Washington
Examiner ]. "We saw five dead in the Jan. 6 attempted coup d'etat. We saw possible
assassination plots against both former Vice President Mike Pence and House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi. We saw coercion designed to prevent certification of President Biden's Electoral
College victory. We now see the Capitol necessarily secured behind razor wire. But we also
see some Republican members of Congress trying to sneak guns onto the House floor. One has
even called for violence. It is time to confront these putschists." One suggested measure:
'Make fire and police departments that receive federal grants have their members sign
commitments not to engage in acts to overthrow the government.'" • Hmm.
Impeachment
"House Dems make their impeachment case in pretrial brief" [
ABC ]. "'The only honorable path at that point was for President Trump to accept the
results and concede his electoral defeat. Instead, he summoned a mob to Washington, exhorted
them into a frenzy, and aimed them like a loaded cannon down Pennsylvania Avenue,' the
managers wrote in their brief submitted ahead of next week's trial of the former president."
•
The Pennsylvania secretary of state who emerged as a villain to supporters of former
President Donald Trump said Monday she will resign for failing to comply with an unrelated
state election law.
Kathy Boockvar, a Democrat, will leave office on Feb. 5. Her office botched the handling of
a state constitutional amendment that would allow more sexual abuse victims to sue their
alleged abusers.
In a statement, she said, "I've always believed that accountability and leadership must be a
cornerstone of public service. While I only became aware of the mistake last week, and
immediately took steps to alert the administration to the error, I accept the responsibility on
behalf of the department."
Pennsylvania law requires that proposed amendments pass the state legislature twice. The
secretary of state's office must publicize the proposed amendment in two newspapers in each of
the state's 67 counties ahead of the election between votes, which her office failed to do.
Gov. Tom Wolf, also a Democrat, announced Boockvar's resignation in a press release that
stressed the issue was separate from the presidential election.
"This change at the Department of State has nothing to do with the administration of the
2020 election, which was fair and accurate,"
Wolf said .
6 Warning Signs from Biden's First Week in Office The "progressive" candidate praised as
a "woke bloke" seems to be carrying on where all his authoritarian Imperialist predecessors
left off Kit Knightly
What do these orders, or any of his other moves, tell us about the future plans of the
recently "elected" administration? Nothing good, unfortunately.
1. VACCINATION
PASSPORTS
I still remember people claiming the introduction of vaccination passports (or immunity
passes or the like) was just a "conspiracy theory", the paranoid fantasy of fringe "covidiots".
All the way back in December, when they were
getting fact-checked by tabloid journalists who can't do basic maths .
International Certificates of Vaccination or Prophylaxis. Consistent with applicable law,
the Secretary of State, the Secretary of HHS, and the Secretary of Homeland Security
(including through the Administrator of the TSA), in coordination with any relevant
international organizations, shall assess the feasibility of linking COVID-19 vaccination to
International Certificates of Vaccination or Prophylaxis (ICVP) and producing electronic
versions of ICVPs.
2. CABINET APPOINTMENTS
Biden's cabinet is praised as the "most diverse" in history, but will hiring a few non-white
people really change the decades-old policies of US Imperialism? It certainly doesn't look like
it.
His pick for Under Secretary of State is Victoria Nuland , a neocon warmonger and
one of the masterminds of the Maidan coup in Ukraine in 2014. She is married to Robert Kagan , another neocon
warmonger, co-founder of the Project for a New American Century and senior fellow at the
Brookings Institute and one of the masterminds behind the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
The incoming Secretary of State, Antony Blinken , is also an inveterate US
Imperialist, arguing for every US military intervention since the 1990s, and criticised Trump's
decision to withdraw from Syria.
Biden's pick for Defence Secretary is the first African-American ever appointed to this
role, but former General Lloyd Austin is hardly going be some kind of "progressive" voice int
his cabinet. He's a career soldier who retired from the military in 2016 to join the
board of Raytheon Technologies , an arms manufacturer and military contractor.
As "diverse" as this cabinet may be in skin colour or gender there is most certainly no
"diversity" of opinion or policy. There are very few new faces and no new thoughts.
So, it looks like we can expect more of the same in terms of foreign policy. A fact that's
already been displayed in
3. IRAQ
Despite heavy resistance from the military and Deep State, Donald Trump wanted to end the
war in Iraq and pledged to pull American troops out of the country. This was one of Trump's
more popular policies, and during the campaign Biden made no mention of intending to reverse
that decision.
The Iraqi parliament has made it clear it wants the US to
take its military off their soil , so any American forces on Iraqi land are technically
there illegally in contravention of international law. But that never bothered them
before.
4. AFGHANISTAN
Turns out the US can't withdraw from Afghanistan either. Last February Trump signed a deal
with the Taliban that all US personnel would leave Afghanistan by May 2021.
Joe Biden has already committed to "reviewing"
this deal . Sec. Blinken was quoted as saying that Biden's admin wanted:
to end this so-called forever war [but also] retain some capacity to deal with any
resurgence of terrorism, which is what brought us there in the first place".
As a great man once
said , nothing someone says before the word "but" really counts. The US will not be
withdrawing from Afghanistan, and if there is any public pressure to do so, the government will
simply claim the Taliban broke their side of the deal first, or stage a few terrorist
attacks.
5. AND SYRIA
Far from simply continuing the on-going wars, there are already signs Biden's "diverse" team
will look to escalate, or even start, other conflicts.
Syria was another theatre of war from which Donald Trump wanted to extricate the United
States,
unilaterally ordering all US troops from the country in late 2019.
We now know the Pentagon ignored those orders. They lied to the
President , telling Trump they had followed his orders but not withdrawing a single man.
This organized mutiny against the Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed Forces was played for a
joke in the media when it was finally revealed.
There will be no need for any such duplicity now Biden is in the Oval Office, he was a
vocal critic of the decision to withdraw , claiming it gave ISIS a "new lease of life".
Indeed, within two days of his being sworn in a column of American military vehicles was
seen entering Syria from Iraq
.
6. DOMESTIC TERRORISM
We called this before the
inauguration . They made it just too obvious. Before the dirty footprints had been cleaned
from Nancy Pelosi's desk it was clear where it was all going.
Direct the Justice Department, FBI and National Security Council to execute a top-down
approach prioritizing domestic terrorism; pass new domestic terrorism legislation; or do a
bit of both as Democrats propose a crack down on social media giants like Facebook for
algorithms that promote conspiracy laden posts.
That last part is key. The "crack down on social media" part, because the anti-Domestic
Terrorism legislation will likely be very focused on communication and so-called
"misinformation".
Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez has publicly called for a congressional panel to
"rein in" the media :
We're going to have to figure out how we rein in our media environment so you can't just
spew disinformation and misinformation,"
And who will be the target of these crack downs and new legislations? Well, according John
Brennan (ex-head of the CIA and accomplished war criminal), practically anybody:
They're casting a wide net. Expect "extremist", "bigot" and "racist" to be just a few of the
words which have their meanings totally revised in the next few months. "Conspiracy theorist"
will be used a lot, too.
Further, they are moving closer and closer toward the "anyone who disagrees with us is
literally insane" model. With many articles actually talking about "de-programming" Trump
voters. The Atlantic suggests "mental
hygiene" would cure the MAGA problem.
Again AOC is on point here, clearly auditioning for the role of High Inquisitor, claiming
that the new Biden government needs to fund programs that "de-radicalise" "conspiracy
theorists" who are on the "spectrum
of radicalisation" .
*
As I said at the beginning, it's been a busy week for Joe Biden, but you can sum up his
biggest policy plans in one short sentence: More violence overseas, less tolerance of dissent
and strict clampdowns on "misinformation".
Blinken does not seem to have repented from his fundamentalist belief in American
imperial goodness, notwithstanding his appeal for "humility".
Barring an earthquake in Washington, Antony Blinken is set to become the new U.S. Secretary
of State and America's top diplomat. The youthful and telegenic Blinken (58) takes over from
Mike Pompeo who was America's representative to the world under the last Trump
administration.
The contrast could not be more stark. In place of Pompeo's thuggish, rough-edged style,
Blinken has the appearance of consummate diplomat. He's fluent in French owing to a European
education, he's urbane and sophisticated and comes from a family which has diplomacy in its
genes. His father was an ambassador to Hungary and an advisor to President John F Kennedy. An
uncle was ambassador to Belgium.
Blinken has Hungarian and Russian Jewish ancestry. His mother remarried a Polish-American
Jewish survivor of the Nazi holocaust. During his confirmation hearing in the Senate this week,
Blinken
told the story of how his stepfather escaped from a Nazi death march in Bavaria and was
eventually rescued by an American tank driven by an African-American officer.
That story has shaped Blinken's worldview of America's prestige and international role. He's
a proponent of U.S. military interventionism with a presumption of moral duty. He's an advocate
of America working with European allies and upholding the transatlantic alliance – in
contrast to Trump's boorish America First sloganeering. Understandably, Blinken is imbued with
an unshakable belief in "American exceptionalism" and "manifest destiny" as a world leader.
The Senators at his confirmation hearing this week
swooned as Blinken spoke. He's certain to be confirmed as the new Secretary of State in the
coming days. That's because he is seen to be perfect for the task of restoring America's
international image which has been so badly tarnished under Trump and his grumpy gofer Pompeo.
The Europeans will lap up Blinken and his transatlantic romanticism.
Blinken has said that America's foreign policy must be conducted with "humility and
confidence", which may sound refreshingly modest. But it's not. Underlying this "quiet
American" is the same old arrogance about U.S. imperial might-is-right and Washington's
presumed privilege of appointing itself as the "world's policeman".
If Blinken's record is anything to go on, his future role as America's top diplomat is
foreboding.
Previously, he was a senior member in the Obama administrations serving as national security
advisor to both the president and Joe Biden who was then vice-president. Blinken rose to become
deputy Secretary of State in the final years of the second Obama administration. In those roles
he was a key player in a series of foreign interventions which turned out to be utterly
disastrous.
He was a big proponent of U.S. military intervention in Libya in 2011 which led to the
toppling and murder of Muammar Gaddafi. That intervention along with other NATO powers has left
a ruinous legacy not only for Libya but for North Africa, the Mediterranean and Europe.
Blinken was also a point-man in Obama's intervention in Syria where the U.S. (and other NATO
powers) supplied weapons to anti-government militants. The so-called "rebels" were in fact
myriad terrorist groups affiliated with Al Qaeda and other extremist Islamists. Up to half a
million people have been killed in the decade-long Syrian war and much of that blood is on
America's hands from its de facto support for terror gangs. Maybe Blinken genuinely thought he
was supporting "pro-democracy rebels". But even if we give him the benefit of doubt, the upshot
is still a disaster of American interventionism.
Another catastrophic consequence of Blinken's policymaking is Yemen. Under his direction,
the Obama administration backed the Saudi war on its southern neighbor beginning in March 2015
and continuing to this day. Yemen has become the worst humanitarian crisis in the world with
millions facing starvation amid Saudi aerial bombardment carried out with U.S. warplanes and
logistics.
The new Biden administration has indicated it will withdraw military support for Saudi
Arabia in its war on Yemen. But that doesn't absolve the U.S., and Blinken in particular, for
having created the horrendous quagmire from which it is belatedly trying to extricate itself
from.
What's rather perplexing, however, is that Blinken does not seem to have repented from his
fundamentalist belief in American imperial goodness, notwithstanding his appeal for "humility".
During his Senate hearings, he
showed little regret about America's illegal bombing of Libya and its arming of jihadists
in Syria.
He described the world with the conventional brainwashed American ideology as being a place
where China, Russia, Iran and North Korea are enemies that must be confronted. He also
told Senators he was in favor of increasing supplies of lethal weaponry to the Ukraine and
its rabidly anti-Russian regime in Kiev. Recall that it was the Obama administration which
instigated a coup d'état in Kiev against an elected president in February 2014. The new
regime was and is dominated by far-right nationalists who laud past links to Nazi Germany. If
Blinken has his way the war against ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine will escalate and could
ignite a bigger confrontation between Russia and the U.S.
One of the hallmarks of the U.S.-backed regime in Kiev is its espousal of Neo-Nazi
traditions and in particular antisemitic hatred.
Given Antony Blinken's own Jewish ancestry and his own intimate connection to the Nazi
holocaust, you do have to question his competence if he becomes America's foreign policy
leader. His boss President Joe Biden has fondly lionized Blinken as a "superstar" of diplomacy.
Superficially perhaps, he has finesse and intelligence. But in much the same basic way of
adhering to American imperialism, Blinken is as crude and thuggish as his predecessor Pompeo.
He just projects a more plausible look and sound, which is most desirable as a moral cover for
America's criminal imperialism.
Blinken is
known to self-deprecate his "insatiable habit" for making up bad puns. For example, on one
occasion when he was addressing an audience on policy regarding the Arctic, he began by joking
he would be "breaking the ice". Given his ability to pursue destructive dead-end policies, he
might therefore appreciate the moniker "Secretary of State Tony Blinkered".
he direct evidence is Pravy Sektor's Sergei Dybynyn at the front of the violent Capitol groups yelling "Faster! Faster!" in
Russian. At first, the media started trying to paint Dybynyn as a Russian propagandist and provocateur. But, the fact Dybynyn
received a medal from former Ukrainian president Petr Poroshenko for his work changed that story and big media dropped it.
Because of his work for Poroshenko,
he
is wanted for supporting terrorism
in the Donbass Lugansk People's Republic.
In August 2020, we reported on the ties between Ukrainian neo-Nazis and US Antifa. The Ukrainian fascists were given asylum in
the US by the Obama administration working with John Brennan in the tens of thousands from late 2016 to 2020. When the FBI caught
on to the violent groups relocating to the US from Ukraine, they stopped it. Over 17,000 Ukrainian nationalists emigrated during
this timeframe.
According to the WaPo article,
"an
unlikely nationality has come to represent a disproportionate share of the refugees who have been entering the United States in
recent years: Ukrainians.
The United States last year resettled more nationals from Ukraine, a country that barely registers in the United Nations'
assessments of the global refugee crisis, than it did almost any other nationality
Many
of the newly arrived Ukrainians have ended up here in Washington state, near Seattle "
In that
article
series
we warned the large groups of
Ukrainian
nationalists
came to the US for the purpose of beefing up riots against Donald Trump after they started. This Obama policy
brought the worst of the worst into the US under a false asylum claim until it was finally stopped.
Sergei Dybynyn self-identifies as a Pravy Sektor (Right Sector) member in the middle photo. The blood and soil (red and black)
menorah is what Jewish members wear showing off affiliation.
The connection between Ukraine's radical nationalists (fascists) and AntiFa-BLM is they began their history together. Azov
battalion which I'll be focusing on is another Pravy Sektor spinoff and US aid funding goes through Pravy Sektor leader Dmitro
Yarosh hands.
Time Magazine's January 7
th
article
seems
to be a lead-in waiting for the proof of Azov's participation in the Capitol siege. The article lays it out and makes that point.
"Outside Ukraine, Azov occupies a central role in a network of extremist groups stretching from California across Europe to New
Zealand, according to law enforcement officials on three continents.
"Azov has been recruiting, radicalizing, and training American citizens for years," the letter said. Christopher Wray, the
director of the FBI, later confirmed in testimony to the U.S. Senate that American white supremacists are "actually traveling
overseas to train."
In their letter to the State Department in 2019, U.S. lawmakers noted that "the link between Azov and acts of terror in America
is clear." The Ukrainian authorities have also taken notice."
Former Ukrainian president Petr Poroshenko has supported the work of Pravy Sektor and Azov since 2014 when they propelled him
into power; they in turn support him. Poroshenko has worked non-stop to unseat Donald Trump since the 2016 election season.
Ukrainian MP Andrey Derkach published taped conversations between Poroshenko and then Vice President Joe Biden explicitly
detailing how Poroshenko fabricated allegations about Paul Manafort in an attempt to derail the Trump campaign.
What kind of opportunities requiring courage would Ukraine be looking for? The following Poroshenko tweet after the Capitol siege
caught my eye for that reason.
The ICC is investigating Ukraine for atrocities committed by Azov and Pravy Sektor on his watch as president and even before any
of the facts are known, he's condemning Donald Trump. Was he in on it? I started watching for a cookie to be thrown to him and
didn't have to wait long for it.
On January 11
th
,
the US Treasury sanctioned the Ukrainians who exposed Poroshenko and Joe Biden's effort against Trump as well as Burisma ties.
MP
Andrey Derkach also exposed
the details of the Biden-Burisma scandal at the same time.
Exposing
the Biden-Ukraine 2016 election interference
is the same as the Russian election interference narrative in 2020.
Poroshenko did take advantage of every window of opportunity to make sure Biden made it past January 6
th
.
What you are about to read raises serious questions for me. Is there such a thing as too many coincidences? When does coincidence
line up to conspiracy? This is
Maxim
Yarosh
(Макс Ярош). According to his own statements, his job in Azov is infiltration and crowd agitation. Yarosh is a Pravy
Sektor member and very active in the violence in Ukraine from Maidan until now. As you can see in the photo, Poroshenko awarded
him medals for his service. His reputation for thuggishness speaks for itself.
In the photo below, he is in the first row, second from the left, and on the right is former US Ambassador Geoff Pyatt. Ukrainian
soldiers didn't take photos with Pyatt unless they have high enough standing with Petr Poroshenko. Poroshenko and Yarosh knew
each other well going all the way back to Pyatt's tenure.
Around the January 9
th
through
the 11
th
,
Yarosh makes a point of establishing he was in Quito, Ecuador for a religious pilgrimage (his words). The timing itself raises an
eyebrow and the proof he posted on Facebook are two photos showing him at the airport and this one placing him outside the Mayor
San Jose Seminary showing off his neo-nazi tattoos.
Even if we know one Pravy Sektor member, Sergei Dybynyn, was videoed taking part in the Capitol siege, so far it's not
newsworthy. But if Yarosh was there, then things change completely.
At the same time, according to Petr Poroshenko, he took his family (wife and children) to Ecuador. His story is they flew in
under an assumed name (fake passports), rented a yacht, and toured the Galapagos Islands for a couple of weeks starting at the
end of December until around January 11
th
or
12
th
.
The circumstantial evidence that points to the possibility Yarosh was involved in the Capitol siege, which involves Poroshenko,
was reported in the news. Maxim Yarosh made a point of confronting Petr Poroshenko on the flight to Amsterdam and again after
they landed.
In light of the events on the 6
th
,
this looks like a crude attempt at establishing an alibi for Maxim Yarosh.
The following video is unedited and of poor
quality. Unless you speak Russian, I'd suggest turning the volume off and concentrating on what's wrong with the video.
Petr Poroshenko was the President of Ukraine until 2019. Ex-presidents have State provided bodyguard details for life. If you
google "Poroshenko bodyguard" you'll see why Poroshenko doesn't travel without bodyguards anywhere.
There were no bodyguards on the plane intervening or even visible. There were none at the airport to intervene for Poroshenko.
The ex-president looks like he's playing a part.
Ukrainian Billionaires like Poroshenko that fly halfway across the world to rent a yacht for a few weeks don't fly business class
on commercial airliners. Looking at the seating arrangement, he might as well have gone with economy class. His wife kneels in
the aisle next to his seat to take part in the conversation. It makes you wonder if he moved to this seat just for the video.
Petr Poroshenko and his wife are the only two people not wearing COVID masks on the flight which makes them the only two people
that were 100% identifiable on the video.
At the airport, for a few seconds, Poroshenko drops back a few steps talking with what might be another radical. Again, there are
no presidential bodyguards to be found.
Here's the problem. Yarosh has the motive, method, time, and opportunity to have been part of the Capitol siege.
Yarosh is the right guy for the job, has the needed skill sets and mentality, and most importantly places himself with the one
guy in the world that wants to make a Capitol siege event happen so he can claw back into power.
If anyone has facial recognition capabilities, this is a key person to look for at the Capitol.
Poroshenko's Ukrainian neo-Nazis and AntiFa
According to AntiFa, from the beginning of the group in pre-Nazi Germany, they were a socialist group fighting fascists like the
Nazis. While the statement is almost true in a specific timeframe, they were never the social humanitarian heroes they pretend to
be.
The leader of the political group Antifa belonged to at the time was an architect of the final solution during WWII. That's a
little different than they like to present themselves.
AntiFa's history can be summarized like this -- the group started out as the military wing of the
German
Communist Party (KPD)
. Before the rise of Hitler, they supported Stalin and Marxist socialism. Nazis were fascists. The KPD
didn't like other socialist groups so they were labeled fascist too.
The KPD's armed group was AntiFa and they fought in the streets against every group the KPD labeled fascist. The KPD decided it
liked Hitler so Stalin was fascist. Then Hitler was fascist again. After this they merged with the SA, better known as the
Brownshirts and Stalin was fascist again.
The Waffen SS was formed as a subgroup by the SA (Antifa) which was demanding the socialism Adolf Hitler promised them.
"The Munich-born American historian Konrad Heiden was one of the first to document this phenomenon in his 1936 book Hitler: A
Biography, remarking that within the Sturmabteilung (Brownshirts, SA) ranks there were "large numbers of Communists and Social
Democrats" and that "many of the storm troops were called 'beefsteaks' – brown outside and red within." The switching of
political parties was at times so common that SA men would jest that "[i]n our storm troop there are three Nazis, but we shall
soon have spewed them out."
Wikipedia
Hitler didn't like the political power the leader of the
SA
,
Ernst Rohm was gaining or the AntiFa SA elements who were looting, robbing, and raping and demanding socialism while he was
trying to consolidate power. He set up the Reichstag fire to deal with all the Nazi's undesirables and his competitor. The night
of the long knives followed.
The Nazis prosecuted the KPD-AntiFa's top leader, Ernst Torgler. After Torgler was found innocent, he worked for Reinhard
Heidrich in 1941. Hitler called Heidrich the man with the iron heart.
In 1942, they presented "The Final Solution to the Jewish Problem." Reinhard and the KPD-AntiFa leader Torgler were the
architects of the Holocaust.
In 1941, Ukrainian nationalists formalized their relations in with the SA and SS Antifa groups with 3 Waffen SS Battalions.
In 1991, the last Ukrainian nationalist leader from that period (Slava Stetsko) immigrated to Ukraine and started her own
political party with a militant wing. The militant wing called Trizub-Bandera is led by Dmitro Yarosh, the head of today's Pravy
Sektor, Azov, and the other groups that came out of the 2014 Maidan.
German Foreign Policy notes
the successors to Slava Stetsko's OUN (Ukrainian Nationalists) are Svoboda, CUN, Pravyi Sector,
and UNA-UNSO.
Ultra-Nationalist UNA-UNSO also doubles as Ukraine's Antifa and has taken this mantle for a few decades.
Why would Ukraine neo-nazis help Antifa and the Democrats with the Capitol siege? In the photo they're working together in Lviv,
Ukraine.
All three share the same politics. Imagine the 3
rd
Reich
without Hitler. Imagine.
It's not only the Ukrainian nationalists and US Antifa-BLM, but over 120+ Congressmen and Senators from both parties support the
groups that made this happen and should be investigated formally.
At 12:13 PM on January 6th, 2020, Trump Supporters began chanting "BULLSH*T" in the
overflow area after President Trump made a statement on election fraud. Soon after this a
group began gathering and left for the US Capitol around 12:20 PM while President Trump was
still speaking.
The Capitol is 1.6 miles away from Ellipse Park which is near the White House. This is
approximately a 30-33 minute walk. Trump began addressing the crowd at 11:58 AM and made his
final remarks at 1:12 PM. Therefore, protesters, activists and rioters had already breached
Capitol Grounds a mile away 19 minutes prior to the end of President Trump's speech.
I arrived outside Capitol Grounds at 12:50 PM, within 3 minutes rioters forced the
Capitol Police to retreat and breached both sets of barriers protecting the Capitol from the
backside of the building officially establishing the location where the riot will take
place.
For over an hour a large-scale riot blazed at the base of the US Capitol, leading to over
50 police officer's and countless protestors being injured. A continuous barrage of rubber
bullets, tear gas, pepper spray, and crowd control munitions were deployed at the crowd
affecting thousands of people.
ANTIFA Press can be seen setting up a photo-op of a fellow comrade, this is a very common
tactic they use when framing a specific narrative.
Advertisement - story continues below
A man with a hole in his cheek due to a rubber munition makes a statement, then takes a
bath in pepper spray.
Advertisement - story continues below
Rioters cut into ramparts and began climbing in an attempt to get past the Police. After
over 20 minutes rioters successfully forced themselves past the remaining Officers guarding
the Capitol.
What seems to be an ANTIFA Provocateur is seen removing his gas mask to take a drink of
water, he immediately put his mask back on when noticed he was being recorded. Rioters are
seen entering the Capitol through broken windows and a pair of double doors that have been
opened from within. A Rioter is also seen attempting to kick doors down inside
unsuccessfully, and another smoking a cigarette.
At approximately 2:35 PM, Ashli Babbitt began to wander from the main group. I then
followed her to a pair of doors leading to the Senate Chambers, a crowd quickly followed and
one rioter in a fur hat began violently punching windows.
John Sullivan, ANTIFA organizer, and BLM Activist is seen telling Officers to "Go home."
After being arrested he faced the following charges; civil disorder, disorderly conduct, and
entering a restricted building without authority. Almost immediately after being detained, he
was released with no bail.
Ashli Babbitt is seen pulling herself through the window frame when she was shot in the
neck, without warning by an agent who was hiding around the corner. All three officers who
were protecting the doors are seen against the wall next to where Ashli was shot. No verbal
warnings or attempts to stop her were made.
A man shifted Ashli's body after she fell from the window. Three Capitol Police Officers are
seen on the stairs, none of which attempted to apply medical aide to Ashli's gunshot wound. For
a brief moment I attempted to provide light so the gunshot wound could be found. When located,
pressure was applied but there was nothing we could have done to save her.
Mainstream Media reported that Ashli Babbitt died in the hospital, this is a lie. I
watched Ashli Babbitt's life drain from her eyes, she died laying in a flag of red, white,
and blue. The same colors she served her Country in for 14 years.
Advertisement - story continues below
If Ashli Babbitt died in the hospital, why was she carried down the stairs, upside down, and
with no pressure on her wound?
I, Tayler Hansen, in no way, shape, or form support the events that unfolded on the 6th.
With that being said, it doesn't take a genius to know it's impossible for unarmed protestors
to have successfully breached one of the most secure buildings on Earth, while the Vice
President was inside. As time passes one thing becomes more clear, the Capitol was the perfect
set up, and Trump supporters took the bait.
The Capitol siege was the biggest political power grab in modern-day history. The Left has
officially shifted the spotlight, and this time they're coming for Trump supporters. We're
witnessing the most intense roll out of Big Tech censorship we've ever seen. Which just so
happens to be targeting President Trump, conservatives, and what's left of real journalists.
Big Tech told conservatives to create their own platform if they didn't want to be censored, so
they did. In response, Apple and Google removed that platform Parler, an app founded on free
speech. Mainstream media is attempting to silence independent and fact-based reporting, forming
the ultimate monopoly on the so-called "truth". They have Americans right where they want
them.
Advertisement - story continues below
This was ANTIFA's proudest, and most accomplished moment yet. Known ANTIFA provocateurs have
been exposed for causing the initial violence and unrest at the Capitol, but it doesn't matter.
Left-wing extremist groups have caused over $2B in property damage, attempted to burn down
Federal Buildings, and are responsible for over 30 deaths since last May of 2020. There were
never any reports of an "insurrection" or "terrorist attack" when ANTIFA attempted to occupy
Federal Buildings in Portland or the historic courthouse in Nashville. Left-wing terrorists
have received nothing but praise from elected officials, celebrities, and mainstream media
throughout their existence.
Meanwhile, the mainstream media has labeled everyone at the US Capitol "Domestic Terrorists"
even the hundreds of thousands who were there in DC to listen to President Trump and then left
the area after he ended his speech. We're bearing witness to the ultimate double standard.
"The Capitol siege was the biggest political power grab in modern-day history. "
That's a negative, Sir. The biggest political grab in modern-day history was the theft of
the 2020 Presidential election from President Trump right before our very own eyes.
And the indirect proof?
Now D.C. must be militarized indefinitely
because of all the violence on the right.
What violence had the right committed
over the previous 12 months? Almost none.
Who was rioting nonstop for the past year?
This violence is like "racism" in the universities--
yes, there is racism--but perpetuated by whom?
The lying leftist media, and RINO Quisling enablers, will allow the Democrat Nazis to use
this fake "Reichstag Fire" to impose a dictatorship upon the United States.
Was FBI informant Enrique Tarrio was running a off the books operation when he helped
create the Proud Boys in 2016 around the time the RUSSIA!!! hoax was created by the FBI as
well?
This is about painting a target on Tarrio's back. What other purpose could it serve? Just
the kind of sleazeball tactics one expects from the Derp State. And even if it was true, so
what? The people he allegedly help snag were "bad hombres."
Target?
Good!!!!
He put over a dozen people in Fed were there is no parole.
The guy is a FBI snitch and he was being run by the FBI when he helped "create" PB.
The Proud Boys are a FBI creation.
Who the heck knows. At this point. What's it matter. No one can be trusted. Not even you.
You could be an Demokkkrat communist operative feeding false information to stir up conflict.
That is what they want. The Demokkkrats sent Antifa in to stir up trouble at the Capitol.
That is exactly what happened in Nazi Germany to protect the 3rd Reich. Now we have the
Demokkkrats playing the same thing. We all all screwed. It isn't going to end well.
Already did. She was spewing nonsense. Proud Boys was started by Gavin McInnes. So I guess
he's and FBI informant as well. The whole story stinks, and only serves the purposes of the
Derp State. And yet this troll is desperate to blow it up out of all proportion. Cui bono? I
like GP, but the commenters aren't necessarily the most sophisticated crowd, given the
upvotes she's received.
One case that's not making news in the Democrat Party's mainstream media is a
decision made by a Virginia judge on Monday. The
judge ruled that last-minute changes made by election officials to allow absentee ballots
with missing or illegible postmarks to be counted is illegal.
Washington Examiner- "This is a big win for the Rule of Law," said Public Interest Legal Foundation President J. Christian Adams, who represented
Frederick County electoral board member Thomas Reed in the case. "This consent decree gives Mr.
Reed everything he requested -- a permanent ban on accepting ballots without postmarks after
Election Day and is a loss for the Virginia bureaucrats who said ballots could come in without
these protections."
The case was over a Virginia Board of Elections rule issued in August that allowed mail-in
ballots without a postmark to be received up to three days after the November election.
The new Virginia Board of Elections rule notified county election boards that any
ballots "received by the general registrar's office by noon on the third day after the election
but does not have a postmark, or the postmark is missing or illegible" should not be rendered
invalid. The elections board decided a week later that those ballots should be counted. One win
for Virginia voters who care about election integrity. It's a pity this practice wasn't stopped
BEFORE the ballots were tabulated in the November election.
I also noticed two months ago how quickly the vital questions concerning the mail-on ballots
got diverted into some wild goose-chase involving voting machine software from Venezuela.
Another attempt at side-tracking the investigation and drumming up support for 'régime
change'?
As far as the Q-Anons themselves are concerned, I always sympathized with them to a large
extent, even though I thought their 'theories' were a little off. Most of them are good people
by nature, but perhaps just a little too credulous. I agree with Larry here: put your faith in
God, not man. When analyzing the events of this world, stick to evidence and logic as much as
you can. At the end of the day, hope is just another drug--hopium--that can skew your judgment
... which is just what the enemy wants.
But I have to admit that I still like the Q-Anon motto: 'Where we go one, we go all'
(WWG1WGA). I'd like to rehabilitate it for general use by us deplorables, if I may. ;-)
Due to the immense power of propaganda, normal people who should identify politically as the
"left" are actually supporting these dangerous policies and the erosions of liberty are
accelerating in direct proportion to the level of resistance, such as r/Wallstreetbets and the
immediate crackdown across several platforms to stop them.
I've seen an extraordinary erosion of rights and liberties over the past few years. It
really started with the cover up after the Trump election, which sought to steer the
narrative of public opinion away from the failure of the Clintons and the Democratic machine
with obvious fantastic lies about Russia.
For a myriad of reasons probably understood best by likes of Freud, Jüng, and others,
everyone on the left (who are supposed to be the smart and rational ones in society) bought
these lies and repeated them.
Once this was allowed to happen, once Maddow was allowed to lead the vanguard of libel
with no recourse, the snowball began to roll and now we are seeing the enforcement of that
thought-policing, which is as unconstitutional as the libel itself, especially considering it
is being perpetrated ubiquitously among media owners.
The phenomenon of Donald Trump the villain President has been used as an excuse to destroy
free speech and shoe horn in authoritarian policies. Due to the immense power of propaganda,
normal people who should identify politically as the "left" are actually supporting these
dangerous policies and the erosions of liberty are accelerating in direct proportion to the
level of resistance, such as r/Wallstreetbets and the immediate crackdown across several
platforms to stop them.
This Wall St. favoritism is obvious, but will likely end without bankers taking much
damage besides some short term outrage. They still control all the levers of currency and
trade no matter the President.
The real dangers of the day are the clamping down on speech. Starting with imprisoning
Julian Assange and then migrating to various corners of the Internet. I'll be very interested
to see how things shake out with the stock market, but I imagine it will go back to the firm
grip of those who control the money supply, which it was for a very long time.
In the meantime, shutting down the Reddit forums and Discord servers is a very serious
danger and I hope we can shine a light on it.
"... "I am also reading the the next focus of the little people investors is the highly manipulated precious metals markets.....I love the smell of burning Wall Street in the morning." ..."
"... Back in the Oughts when the fraudulent mortgages were grossly inflating Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), there were many instances of naked short selling to keep honest REITs down, activities I learned firsthand. We formed a shareholders organization that lobbied the SEC to enforce its laws but to no avail--the regulators were well captured and did zip. ..."
"... There's short selling, and then there's naked short selling. Why do the markets require naked short selling? If those hedge funds already owned the stocks that they are selling short, they would not be in such trouble now. ..."
Early this week a few amateur stock trading nerds decided to promote a stock that was heavily shortened by certain hedge funds.
The idea was to raise the stock price of Game Stop Corp., a vendor for computer games, by having lots of small stock traders to
buy into it. The hedge fund that shortened the stock, and thereby bet on a dropping stock price, would then make huge losses while
the many small buyers would potentially profit.
Instead of greed, this latest bout of speculation, and especially the extraordinary excitement at GameStop, has a different
emotional driver: anger. The people investing today are driven by righteous anger, about generational injustice, about what
they see as the corruption and unfairness of the way banks were bailed out in 2008 without having to pay legal penalties later,
and about lacerating poverty and inequality. This makes it unlike any of the speculative rallies and crashes that have preceded
it.
The movement was successful. The stock price of Game Stop Corp. rose from some $10 to over $400 within just a few days. The
short seller
had
to take cover under a larger firm:
Hedge fund Melvin Capital closed out its short position in GameStop on Tuesday after taking huge losses as a target of the
army of retail investors. Citadel and Point72 have infused close to $3 billion into Gabe Plotkin's hedge fund to shore up its
finances.
I'm shocked! Absolutely shocked to see that the game of finance is rigged!!!!/snark
There have not been market fundamentals since the beginning of financialization in 1971 when money became fiat instead of gold
backed. I find it interesting that it has taken 50 years for the cancer of financialization to fully compromise the host. It will
be interesting to see where this goes from here.
I think the speed of decline of empire is speeding up as noted by the increase in international investment in China.
I am also reading the the next focus of the little people investors is the highly manipulated precious metals markets.....I
love the smell of burning Wall Street in the morning.
"I am also reading the the next focus of the little people investors is the highly manipulated precious metals markets.....I
love the smell of burning Wall Street in the morning."
Is Max Keiser going after the silver market again? I bet he was posting on r/Wallstreetbets to stir things up!
Back in the Oughts when the fraudulent mortgages were grossly inflating Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), there were many
instances of naked short selling to keep honest REITs down, activities I learned firsthand. We formed a shareholders organization
that lobbied the SEC to enforce its laws but to no avail--the regulators were well captured and did zip.
We even ran full pages ads in the NY Times and WaPost to add visibility to our justifiable outrage, which was well proven when
the bubble burst.
But Obama didn't do his job and enforce the law, and the entire mess is far worse now. This episode epitomizes the amazing
amounts of corruption masquerading as well regulated markets and an equitable financial system.
I support Hudson's debt forgiveness for the main reason it will bankrupt the debt holders--the Financial Parasites--who are
also the beneficiaries of the corrupt system; and with their destruction, will allow for the rise of the Public Financial Utility
that will restore law and order to that realm of the economy. Yes, this must be seen as yet another episode of the longstanding
Class War, one of the most brazen ever.
There's short selling, and then there's naked short selling. Why do the markets require naked short selling? If those hedge
funds already owned the stocks that they are selling short, they would not be in such trouble now.
Citadel and Point72 have infused close to $3 billion into Gabe Plotkin's hedge fund to shore up its finances.
-b
How Robinhood was rigged:
Robinhood sells its orderflow to Citadel for execution. Citadel then chiselled the retail investor for pennies per trade by frontrunning (think high freq trading) before execution
of retail order, inflating the price and cheating the customer.
Citadel bailed out Citron, essentially inheriting the short position. Citadel then threatened Robinhood with refusing payment for orderflow
The Democratic Party controls the Presidency and both houses of Congress. Trump is out of
public life (for now, maybe). This is all starting to feel like 2009 all over again. I
feel as though the focus on understanding Trump voters is to distract away from a lack of a
meaningful agenda to actually progress the country forward, or at worst, an excuse as to why
nothing meaningful will get done. In 2009, the voters handed the Democratic party a gift to
change the system in ways unthinkable and were amenable to such change given the fallout of
the credit crisis. It was largely an opportunity squandered. In 2021, I think the focus on
Trump is displaced energy whereas the focus should be on what the parties agenda is.
That is a good point, Dave, and I think the next Congress will accomplish nothing of
importance. The only changes we will see in the next two years will be executive orders
that will immediately be tied up in Federal Court. Some have said that McConnell prefers to
act as an obstructionist and enjoys a role as the minority leader. I think Schumer, on the
other hand, desperately wants to be King. It's good to be the King!
The Republicans must look upon the democratic party and its control over its subjects
with envy. Worship of feckless leaders and delivery for the PMC and Wall Street class. If a
state party comes out and says this, how much longer can the Republican party exist as a
viable entity without some sort of schism? Granted, Massachusetts GOP was blathering on about
unfair elections and their own Republican disavowed him, so perhaps this is more about the
minor state parties being home to wing nuts while more reasonable types retire to independent
status.
"Where is the line between a successful global business, in-demand services and
consolidation of big data – and attempts to harshly and unilaterally govern society,
replace legitimate democratic institutions, restrict one's natural right to decide for
themselves how to live, what to choose, what stance to express freely?" Putin wondered.
"We've all seen this just now in the US. And everybody understands what I'm talking
about," he added.
The Russian leader was apparently referring to the crackdown by Big Tech corporations like
Twitter, Facebook, Google, Apple and Amazon, mostly on Donald Trump and his supporters, during
the recent presidential election in the US. The companies, which, according to some critics,
sided with Democratic candidate Joe Biden, blocked President Trump's social media accounts over
accusations of inciting violence, with the same being done to many pages of groups and
individuals who'd backed him.
However, one-sided bias claim voiced by some might be an overestimation – the accounts
of Democrats supporters were also subject to restrictions, but on a much smaller scale.
Conservative Twitter-like platform Parler was also forced offline, and now there are calls
to block the Telegram app as well.
These events have shown that Big Tech companies "in some areas have de facto become
rivals to the government," Putin said.
Billions of users spend large parts of their lives on the platforms and, from the point of
view of those companies, their monopolistic position is favorable for organizing economic and
technological processes, the Russian president explained. "But there's a question of how
such monopolism fits the interest of society," he stressed.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
shadow1369 8 hours ago 27 Jan, 2021 07:51 AM
This is a great opportunity for Russia to create some Big Tech operators which actually allow
free speech. Russia certainly has the expertise and the means, and cannot be bullied by
western regimes.
Proton1963 shadow1369 1 hour ago 27 Jan, 2021 02:54 PM
Sure.. But only after the Russians can build a drivable car or a decent smart phone or a
laptop.
The West is surely giving Russia a lot of opportunities, through its own arrogance and
stupidity, does not it ? It keeps going backwards in its effort to diminish Russia. And the
same goes for China too.
JOHNCHUCKMAN 7 hours ago 27 Jan, 2021 08:45 AM
Putin is a remarkable statesman, and he sets a very high standard for political discourse. I
can't think of any of our Western leaders who speak in these truthful and philosophic terms.
What we hear in the West are slogans or whining or complaining.
Tenakakhan JOHNCHUCKMAN 3 hours ago 27 Jan, 2021 01:03 PM
The patriarch of the west has become extremely weak. It seems like our leaders lack any moral
authority to speak truth and common sense for fear of being cancelled. What we see now is the
virtue signaling dregs sponsored by extreme groups leading our nations down the toilet. If a
real war was to break out now we would be cannon fodder.
Hilarous 7 hours ago 27 Jan, 2021 09:04 AM
I think there's a simple explanation. Big tech is afraid to lose section 230 of the
communications act, which stipulates that online platforms are not legally responsible for
user content. Trump and some Republicans have accused social media sites of muzzling
conservative voices. They said undoing Section 230 would let people who claim they have been
slighted sue the companies. So Big Tech has a strong interest to remove Trump and run down a
few bad examples to convince people and politics that Section 230 must remain.
Count_Cash 8 hours ago 27 Jan, 2021 07:40 AM
In many cases they aren't rivals, but owners of government. Money controls everything in the
west and big tech have it. They have taken control of, or are blackmailing governments. The
Western Liberal Regime straddles both Big Tech and government!
RTaccount Count_Cash 7 hours ago 27 Jan, 2021 08:57 AM
Correct. Let us never forget that in America we are ruled by oligarchs just like the rest of
the world, and that our oligarchs are largely hidden. They are our true government, and so it
is meaningless to make this type of distinction.
When
people are denied public records they routinely reach out to us for assistance and more often than not, we are able to request
the same records and we get them. When this happens it is an indicator of a problem because if we are able to get those
records, so too should others.
The
DuPage County Clerk Jean Kaczmarek and her Chief Deputy Scott Mackay signed a contract with Dominion Voting Systems Inc. on
January 24, 2020. After a copy of that contract was requested by an individual and denied, we were asked to assist in getting
the same records. Our Freedom of Information Act request was granted and we find the Dominion Voting Systems encouragements to
avoid transparency very troubling.
8. Customer
shall
take any and all action necessary or appropriate to assert
all applicable
or
potentially applicable exemptions from disclosure
under the FOIA Statute and
take
all other legally permissible steps to resist disclosure of the Information
including, without limitation,
commencement or defense of any legal actions related to such disclosure.
In
the event Customer receives a request for Information under the FOIA Statute, Customer shall inform Dominion of such
request within ten (10) days of Customer's knowledge or such shorter period as necessary under the FOIA Statute to avoid
prejudice to Dominion's ability to oppose disclosure
, Dominion shall use its best efforts to assist and support
Customer's exercise of any statutory exemption in denying a records request under the Freedom of Information Act (5 ILCS
140/1 et seq.). In the event that Customer becomes subject to fines, costs or fees pursuant to Section 11 of the Freedom of
Information Act (5 ICLS 140/11) relying upon Dominion's claim that the information requested is exempt,
Dominion
shall indemnify Customer for those fines, fees and costs, notwithstanding any other provisions In this agreement.
In
the event Customer is required by court order to disclose any of the Information, Customer shall give written notice to
Dominion at the earlier as soon as reasonably practical after tile imposition of such an order.
There are exemptions under FOIA regarding trade secrets and we
understand such exemptions and their applicability to certain information. However, the language in this contract focuses on
encouraging, in fact, instructing the County that they "
shall
"
take any and all action necessary or appropriate to assert "
potentially
applicable exemptions from disclosure
" and to take all other legally permissible steps to resist disclosure of
the information.
In a matter of hours, Biden's key national security people -- Antony Blinken as secretary of
state, Avril Haines as director of national intelligence, and Lloyd Austin as defense secretary
-- gave us a remarkably fulsome idea of what we are in for these next four years.
Haines and Austin, neither of whose records are to be admired, are at bottom functionaries
who were nominated and swiftly confirmed because they do what they are told and do not think
too much -- always a career-advancer in Washington.
It is instead Blinken, who is said to enjoy some kind of
"mind-meld" with Biden, that we must consider carefully. (Such a meld must be odd
terrain.)
Blinken's Senate
testimony last Tuesday sprawled over four hours. It is best to scrutinize his remarks while
seated in a chair with sturdy armrests, ideally to calm one's nerves with a pot of chamomile
tea.
Seen or read as a whole, those four hours gave us an extraordinary display of how empire
works and how it prolongs itself. One by one, Blinken's senatorial interlocutors told him in so
many words, "Son, this is what you need to say if you want our confirmation. We want you to
endorse our commitment to aggression, to unlawful interventions, to 'regime change' ops, to
merciless sanctions, and altogether to the empire. But you must make it look nice. Make it look
thoughtful and complicated and considered."
July 14, 2016: Vice President Joe Biden, right, and Deputy Secretary of State Antony
Blinken. (Air Force, Christopher Hubenthal)
I am convinced, having endured the entire C–Span recording, that what I watched was
sheer ritual. Blinken won the Senate's support and now succeeds the shockingly bovine Mike
Pompeo at State. He will do so, however, with the élan and faux sophistication
our nakedly bankrupt foreign policy now requires if the American pantomime is to be sustained
another four years.
Among Blinken's many rather sad-to-witness "Yes sirs," two standout: his finely chiseled
endorsement of Pompeo's reckless assassination a year ago of Qassem Soleimani, Iran's revered
military commander ("Taking him out was the right thing to do"), and his approval of the Trump
administration's decision to send lethal arms to the manically corrupt regime in Kiev
("Senator, I support providing that lethal defensive assistance to Ukraine," when the Obama
administration, from which he comes, did not.)
Late last year, Blinken
appeared on "Intelligence Matters," the podcast run by Michael Morrell, the coup-mongering
former deputy director at the Central Intelligence Agency and now -- of course -- a regular
commentator on the televisions news networks. In their exchange, the two took up the question
of our "forever wars" and Biden's well-advertised commitment to ending them. Here is a snippet
from Blinken's remarks:
"As for ending the forever wars, large-scale deployment of large, standing U.S. forces in
conflict zones with no clear strategy should and will end under his [Biden's] watch. But we
also need to distinguish between, for example, these endless wars with large-scale,
open-ended deployment of U.S. forces with [sic], for example, discreet, small-scale
sustainable operations, maybe led by special forces to support local actors. In ending the
endless wars we have to be careful not to paint with too broad a brushstroke."
This is what we are in for these coming years, the hyper-rational irrationality of the
middling technocrat. There will be adjustments at the margin, reconsiderations of method. There
will be no consideration whatsoever of America's hegemonic objectives -- of the imperial
project.
Blinken's testimony reflected these bitter truths start to finish.
Changes to the Iran Deal
July 14, 2015: President Barack Obama, with Vice President Joe Biden, announcing the signing
of the Iran-nuclear agreement. (White House)
Of the various questions the new secretary of state took up during his confirmation
hearings, Iran is the most pressing. Senator Bob Menendez, Blinken's interlocutor in this case,
insisted that yes, the U.S. wants to rejoin the 2015 accord governing Iran's nuclear programs,
but only if this includes prohibitions against Tehran's "destabilizing activities" and a
missile program that Iran justly considers essential to its security.
An honest, clear-eyed diplomat who wanted to get somewhere with Tehran would have rejected
the very frame of Menendez's line of inquiry, with its references to "support for terrorism"
and "funding and feeding its proxies." But Blinken read his cues and tucked right in:
"The president-elect believes that if Iran comes back into compliance we would, too, but
we would use that as a platform to seek a longer, stronger agreement and also, as you have
pointed out, to capture these other issues, particularly with regard to missiles and Iran's
destabilizing activities. This would be the objective."
This is sheer charade. Blinken knows as well as anyone else that the added conditions the
Biden regime will require before rejoining the agreement -- an end to Iran's ballistic missile
programs and its support for the Syrian government against Islamists and the illegal U.S.
incursion -- effectively cancel all chances that the U.S. will rejoin the accord.
I
predicted in this space shortly after Biden was elected that he and his foreign policy
people only pretended to be serious about reviving the nuclear agreement with Iran. Blinken's
testimony confirms this.
Over the weekend The Times of Israel , citing Channel 12 television,
reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is sending Yossi Cohen, chief of Mossad and
a close confidant, to Washington to "set out terms" for any revival of the nuclear deal. Israel
purports to "set out terms," and Biden will receive this spook? This is getting completely
unserious. Completely.
On China, Russia, and Venezuela: Blinken was putty in the hands of the Foreign Relations
Committee's across-the-board hawks. A two-fronted new Cold War across both oceans -- Sinophobia
and Russophobia all at once -- is to be our reality these next four years.
Over the weekend, to be noted, the American Embassy in Moscow had the gall to broadcast
routes protesters could take to demonstrations in various Russian cities to dispute Alexei
Navlany's arrest . A good start.
Marco Rubio, the coup-loving senator from Florida, wanted to know if Blinken thought the
U.S. should continue backing Juan Guaidó, the buffoon Rubio and Pompeo puffed up as
Venezuela's "interim leader" as part of a failed coup operation a couple of years ago.
Blinken:
"I very much agree with you, senator, first of all with regard to a number of the steps
that were taken toward Venezuela in recent years, including recognizing Mr. Guaidó and
seeking to increase pressure on the regime . We need an effective policy that can restore
Venezuela to democracy, and how can we best advance that ball? Maybe we need to look at how
we more effectively target the sanctions that we have ."
Grim, grim times lie ahead if Blinken runs State as he promised the Senate he would.
There are those among us who look for shafts of light. People I greatly respect (some,
anyway) thought it was good news when Biden named William Burns, a career foreign service
officer, to head the CIA. At last diplomacy, not unlawful interventions!
Over the weekend, there were reports
that Biden will review -- not more at this point -- the designation of Yemen's Houthis as
terrorists, a label Pompeo affixed as he emptied his desk last week. Finally, we will stop
supporting the Saudis' savagery!
People believe what they need to believe these days, I find, and belief overrides cognition
in many such cases. I caution these people. At bottom Blinken demonstrated for us that no one
who purports to alter our imperial course will ever be allowed to hold high office. For people
such as Blinken, it is merely a question of wielding influence without having any.
This is where Americans live -- in a crumbled republic no longer capable of changing.
Patrick Lawrence, a correspondent abroad for many years, chiefly for the International
Herald Tribune , is a columnist, essayist, author and lecturer. His most recent book is
Time No Longer: Americans After the American Century . Follow him on Twitter @thefloutist . His web site is Patrick Lawrence . Support his work via
his Patreon site .
John Allen aka Ol' Hippy , January 26, 2021 at 12:16
I'm 66, almost 67, and will, most likely, never see any real peace from the US government.
A big portion of the economy is based on imperialist actions and the manufacture of conflicts
around the globe mainly to keeps the arms makers in business. Or simply, war. And no, there
is no nation willing to risk the wrath of the US government by trying to halt this insane
posture of aggression, it's just too big and has a momentum all its own. Biden will continue
unabated this absurd, insanely expensive machine to its eventual implosion in the near
future. All the parts of the fall of the economy are in place, all that's needed is some ill
defined tipping point to be crossed. Perhaps, a war with Iran?
"Blinken has said that America's foreign policy must be conducted with 'humility and
confidence', which may sound refreshingly modest. But it's not. Underlying this 'quiet
American' is the same old arrogance about U.S. imperial might-is-right and Washington's
presumed privilege of appointing itself as the 'world's policeman'.
"If Blinken's record is anything to go on, his future role as America's top diplomat is
foreboding.
"Previously, he was a senior member in the Obama administrations serving as national
security advisor to both the president and Joe Biden who was then vice-president. Blinken
rose to become deputy Secretary of State in the final years of the second Obama
administration. In those roles he was a key player in a series of foreign interventions which
turned out to be utterly disastrous."
The once upon a time manufactured aura of Virtue projected by the Outlaw US Empire that
was swallowed by so many naïve nations has vanished with nothing other than its stark
ugliness as a replacement. Refusal to see that reality is what Xi just referred to again as
"arrogance" which puts Blinken into the same ideological camp as Pompeo. As Global Times notes
, if the Outlaw US Empire's attitude's not going to change, than why should China's as
Pompeo's constant lying is replaced by Psaki's:
"When White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki responded to a question Monday about US-China
relations, she said that 'China is growing more authoritarian at home and more assertive
abroad,' adding that China 'is engaged in conduct that hurts American workers, blunts [US]
technological edge, and threatens [US] alliances and [US] influence in international
organizations.' She also noted that Washington is 'starting from an approach of patience as
it relates to [its] relationship with China.'"
The editor's response to such inanity:
"Psaki's statement shows that the Biden administration's view and characterization of
China is virtually identical to those of the Trump administration. Psaki stressed that 'We're
in a serious competition with China. Strategic competition with China is a defining feature
of the 21st century,' reflecting that the Biden administration only cares about a "new
approach" to holding China accountable."
And Psaki's words are the same as Blinken's, which were the same as Pompeo's and Trump's.
In other words, the hole digging by the Outlaw US Empire in its relations with the rest of
the world will continue, which will cause further deterioration of its domestic Great
Depression 2.0. Yesterday I posted a comment that highlighted Putin's expounding on the
further enhancement of the educational component of Russia's Social Contract that is
impossible for Navalny's backers to match. On the previous thread, a good comparison was made
between the Yeltsin years and the ongoing drowning of the Outlaw US Empire. The Reset that's
in the works isn't the one envisioned by Global Neoliberals like Klaus Schwab of the
WEF/Davos crew. It's what Xi spoke of yesterday that I commented upon and Escobar reported on
today. The Winds of Change are blowing again, but there's a gaping hole in the USA's wind
sock so it can't see in which direction it's blowing.
blinken is bad news.. i think that is very obvious from a superficial read on him.. the usa
can't get out of the ditch it has made for itself.. nothing is gonna change...
'liberal interventionism' has always been the hallmark of the US Liberal Class and its
foreign policy Establishment, especially since at least Wilson's jumping into WWI.
Has the US ever not intervened in Latin America whenever it felt like it or thought its
"interests" were at stake?
I think Caitlan J. has a good grasp on what to expect from the Biden war mongering crowd
that has recently moved into DC once again:
"....Trump's base has been forcefully pushing the narrative that the previous president
didn't start any new wars, which while technically true ignores his murderous actions like
vetoing the bill to save Yemen from U.S.-backed genocide and actively blocking aid to its
people, murdering untold tens of thousands of Venezuelans with starvation sanctions, rolling
out many world-threatening Cold War escalations against Russia, engaging in insane
brinkmanship with Iran, greatly increasing the number of bombs dropped per day from the
previous administration, killing record numbers of civilians, and reducing military
accountability for those airstrikes....
....Rather than a throwback to "new wars" and the old-school ground invasions of the Bush
era, the warmongering we'll be seeing from the Biden administration is more likely to look
like this. More starvation sanctions. More proxy conflicts. More cold war. More coups. More
special ops. More drone strikes. More slow motion strangulation, less ham-fisted overt
warfare...."
---
Simply put, more small scale wars/ops mostly by proxy, more support for local wankers
(like Guaido in Venezuela, who has incredibly little popular support), and more of these
killing sanctions, which are especially pernicious to the civilian populations in vulnerable
countries like Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Nicaragua and Venezuela, etc.
"... Likewise, the looting of BLM was 'largely peaceful', but selfie snapping in the Capitol was a work of 'internal terrorists'. The victors are so dishonest, that I feel pity for Trump – and for all of us. ..."
At 78, after a prolonged illness and without recovering consciousness, Joe Biden succumbed
to the Presidency. The last hopes of the last QAnon believers vanished like smoke in the night,
with Biden assuming the mighty US throne. This is truly a dark day for America and for the
world, as the US example will be followed by many. It is also a farewell to the real world we
were brought up in. The new world is virtual, like most of the inauguration. It is virtual and
dark, ruled by digital companies fronted by old and tired politicians.
The creepy voice of Biden, the voice of a dirty old man offering sweets to a nine-year-old,
delivered some platitudes. Biden was greeted by the dead – by flags marking those who
died of Covid – all highly symbolic: he was elected by the dead, so he owes them. They
say that a man was so annoyed because his in-laws voted for Biden that he stopped visiting
their graves. The King of the Dead, a character out of Game of Thrones, came to govern America
on behalf of lifeless machines.
The frail old man will lead the old women. Together, they are the Gang of Four: Harris, 56,
Pelosi, 80, Clinton, 73. His first days, his first acts were ominous. He donned the mask, an
attribute of Death, and obliged all federal officials and civil servants to wear masks. He
invited Latin America to invade the US. He opened the gates for immigrants from the Middle
East. He promoted sex-change for boys and girls. He returned the US into the climate-change
impending disaster of the Paris Accord. He sent more troops to Syria. He started a new campaign
against Russia and sent warships to the South China Sea.
At the same time, Pelosi
eliminated the words mother , father , son , daughter ,
husband , wife from the vocabulary of Congress as 'sexist'. Such purged language
would never allow a rendering of Virgil's miraculous prophecy ( Incipe, parve puer, risu
cognoscere matrem ) into English, or any other sacred text. It does not matter much; in the
Covid world, there will be no church anyway, no marriage, no woman or man; instead of making
children locally, new Americans will be imported. Indeed, if everything else is outsourced, why
stall at reproduction?
The Biden regime is just a front for the power of Big Data, of the five giants that removed
Trump and installed Biden in the White House. We shall see soon whether the power-thirsty
politicians will be satisfied with fronting for real power. Trump was the last wholly human
statesman at the helm of the Republic, and he was defeated by the mail-in vote.
Whenever Trump complained that it is open to fraud, Bezos' Washington Post screeched,
'President Trump has peddled false claims or imaginary threats about voting by mail'. Three
days after Trump's removal, Amazon (owned by the very same Bezos) rejected mail-in voting for its
unionising employees as the mail-in vote is notoriously unreliable. "We believe that the best
approach to a valid, fair and successful election is one that is conducted manually, in-person,
making it easy to verify",
said Amazon. The mail-in vote for the Presidency was a must because of the pandemic, but
there is no outbreak when Amazon employees try to join a trade union.
Likewise, the looting of BLM was 'largely peaceful', but selfie snapping in the Capitol was
a work of 'internal terrorists'. The victors are so dishonest, that I feel pity for Trump
– and for all of us.
I do feel pity for Donald Trump, though his last days in the White House were anything but
inspirational. He did not dare to pardon people who went for him into the Capitol, he didn't
pardon Assange or Snowden, but surprisingly he pardoned a whole lot of Jewish cheats. The
Jerusalem Postpublished
the list of prominent Jews he pardoned. On the list is an Israeli spy runner Aviem Sella
who was responsible for Jonathan Pollard; the rest are dishonest machers like Sholam
Weiss (who stole US $150 million, sentenced to 850 years) or Eliyahu Weinstein (stole up to
$200 million, sentenced to 24 years). See also a detailed analysis here . A devout believer in the
demonic power of Jews, Trump had thought to make up to them to avoid their anger. In vain:
there are already
plenty of cases against him, from potential tax fraud to sexual assault allegations. A
legal storm is brewing and Mr Trump may not be able to weather it as he has done in the past,
say the US federal prosecutors.
He could be lucky to avoid prison; unless he asks Mr Putin to lend him his excellent if
uncompleted Gelenjik Palace . On
second thoughts, perhaps the palace was built for exactly such an occasion.
The Jews do not need him: they have very strong positions in the new administration, while
gratitude is not a renowned Jewish trait. The Jewish news agency JTA boasted of the Tribe's achievements:
the State Department, CIA, National Intelligence, Homeland Security, NSA, Treasury and in
addition "Nine Jews are in the new Senate (including the new Majority Leader) and 25 in the
House of Representatives, making up more than 6 per cent of the total Congress. That's more
than triple the percentage of Jews in the general population. There are also two Jews out of
the nine justices on the U.S. Supreme Court."
This is not a good sign: Jews are good when allied with the oppressed. Then they use their
energy to promote the cause of the downtrodden. While at the top, they oppress more vigorously
than anybody; ask the Palestinians, if in doubt.
Mind you, I do not subscribe to the idea of Jewish supremacy and massive IQ. The all-Jewish
country of Israel is devastated by three lockdowns, by the biggest vaccination drive in the
world (86% already vaccinated), by an ongoing civil war of Zionist power against Orthodox Jews
who refuse lockdown and vaccination; by the forthcoming fourth national elections, as liberals
incessantly try to remove the Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu saying he is Israel's Trump. This
week, Israel's only remaining international airport was closed down; the people were told
nobody would get out at least until the summer. In this small country with its huge density of
population and poor housing it feels too much like a ghetto for comfort.
If Jews were as clever as they think they are, they would not get themselves into this
no-win Covid war. The Swedish way remains the only way to deal with it, as a
recent study has proven beyond all possible doubt. Israeli Jews have been whipped into such
a degree of Covid hysteria that there is no way to get out of it. Now they, and the
Brits were told that "having a coronavirus vaccination is not a licence to abandon
lockdown". Even if all will be vaccinated, the masks, lockdowns and social distancing will be
with us forever, if the people who decide now remain in power, because Covid is just a
justification for the Great Reset, or Digital Revolution, or the Brave New World or whatever
you call it. Jews got convinced and convinced others, and now they are being screwed up like
everybody else. If lockdown is a punishment meted out by the global force, as C J Hopkins
says , perhaps it
is Netanyahu's retirement they want to obtain.
The Jewish cause works fine when allied with the wishes of the real power. They could remove
Jeremy Corbyn for his alleged tolerance of antisemitism because the bosses hated his plans to
improve the lot of the workers and cut military spending. But Jews have to shut up or even
support Alexei Navalny who expressed his dislike of Jews right before he learned to keep his
mouth shut.
In this screenshot of his response in 2007, Mr Navalny bans somebody for being "a bugger and
a kike". Still, Jews supported him all right when told by their betters. They didn't even
mention his real anti-Jewish prejudice for they were (reasonably) afraid the Russian masses
would see it as rather a feather in his cap. The Jews are in line with the obscure real power,
and have to follow its demands, like the jesters before the king. The Covid plans for the world
reset are more important for the Masters than Jewish sentiments, and Jewish leaders recognise
that.
The Biden regime considers Russia its enemy Number One. Russia is in relatively good shape.
Russians are on their way out of Covid mass hysteria. They have begun to dismantle the Covid
measures. The rules are still there, but people sabotage them as they sabotaged Brezhnev's
rules. They also have their own vaccine Sputnik-V which is an old-style vaccine without gene
modification, as opposed to much of the Western stuff. I do not think it is necessary for
health, but it could help citizens under the spell of Covid to recover and forget the lockdown
nightmare.
Things began to move very fast after Biden was installed in the White House. After a year of
delays caused by US sanctions, on Monday 25/01/2021 the Russian pipe-laying vessel
Fortuna resumed its work off Denmark's shores on the undersea pipeline Nord Stream 2 to
sell Russian gas directly to Europe bypassing the latest US colony, the Ukraine. The US wants
Germany to stop the project and buy (more expensive) American gas instead. It would make Russia
more vulnerable. Despite the sanctions, Germany refused to stop the project. At the same time,
the Russians began to supply gas to Serbia creating a new line bypassing the Ukraine. At this
time, the Biden regime employed the Navalny card.
The return of Alexei Navalny to Russia is part of a plan to undermine Russia. The immense
power of Big Data and its social networks promoted his return as the new savior. But somehow it
didn't work. Instead of the expected tens of thousands, only one or two thousand followers
turned up at the airport, fewer than for a pop singer. He was promptly detained and arraigned
for thirty days. It was anticipated, and his people published his new Gelenjik Palace
film together with his call to demonstrate on 23/01.
The Russian internet had been saturated by YouTube pushing people to view it. The video had
been offered endlessly, time after time, and the numbers of viewers allegedly grew into the
billions. It was basically a psyops played by Google (the owner of YouTube) against Putin.
Again, it didn't work.
I witnessed the demo on Saturday 23/01, and it was not particularly impressive. Being a day
off, with a lot of people walking the streets and practically nobody carrying a poster or a
slogan, it is difficult to estimate how many were actually demonstrating, but it was in the low
thousands, as far as I could see. The police were well behaved; none of the rough justice we
see meted out in Paris or Amsterdam, let alone Washington. The Navalny activists were also
rather peaceful, excepting some marginal figures who were promptly arrested.
It seems that the Russians are not as silly as the Western planners expected them to be. In
1990 they, or their parents listened to Yeltsin's calls to throw off the privileged Communist
rulers because they, the rulers, had it so good with cars, dachas, Western goods. They paid for
this response with ten of the most awful years our generation experienced. Now they and their
children are unlikely to smash their state and their life just because their president has (or
has not) a palace. We shall see what the Russian state will do against inevitable future
assaults.
Putin is a cautious statesman. He does not want to aggravate relations with the Biden
regime, but the digital giants do not leave him many options. A Russian company gave a hand to
the Parler social network that was
deplatformed by Amazon, and it came back into being. Another Russian social network, Vkontakte , began to attract Western users. And
Russia is not alone: Turkey's Erdogan hit
Twitter , Pinterest and Periscope with advertising bans after they refused to follow
Facebook and appoint a local representative to take down contentious posts under a new law
aimed to pass the right to censure from the networks to the Turkish state. Russia plans to
follow the Turks. China has its own networks and is immune to the Big Five pressure.
Now there is the World Economic Forum's annual meeting online, where the victors will decide
how to proceed with their Great Reset. Trump is not invited. In a few days, we shall know more
about their plans, and whether there are any forces we can hope and cheer for. At present it
does not appear there are. Despite their multiple disagreements, they agree against us, so we
all can disagree with them.
I've received a letter saying: This is Miguel from Florence You mentioned Trump's
pardons
one of the only 143 people he pardoned, who knows why, was a tiny Florentine crook, who
was not even in gaol, just being investigated for fraudulent bankruptcy, a certain Tommaso
Buti.
Here is an article I wrote mentioning him, which touches a lot of other amusing
personalities
I believe the Russian vaccine uses an adenovirus, which causes the body's cells to make a
protein also present in the COVID-19 virus that the immune system suppresses. That may not be
as innnovative and questionable as the use of messenger RNA (I'm no immunologist and both
types of vaccines may prove safe and effective in the long run), but the Chinese
vaccine is the traditional one that uses is dead or attenuated viruses to stimulate the
immune system. If I had to take the jab and could choose the vaccine, I'd choose the Chinese
one.
Biden and Nancy seem to believe that Jay Powell can fix and fund anything they want to do.
But real damage has been done. I see it in grocery stores. Missing items that used to always
be available aren't. Auto Assembly lines shutttered because of the chip shortage.Empty store
fronts. Millions out of work. Not just in America but around the world. There isn't a lot to
reopen if they finally decide to reopen. Mothballed airplanes and cruise ships can't be just
restarted and begin service again even if Fauci and that Ethiopian mountain monkey who runs
the WHO declares it safe to resume travel. It doesn't work like that. Hysteresis sets in made
worse because people are scared and demoralized by the tyranny being imposed on them.
Buti was one of the owners/founders of the Fashion Cafe which opened in NYC back in the
90s. He apparently skimmed from the till. The restaurant got a bunch of supermodels like
Claudia Schiffer and Naomi Campbell to invest and do PR appearances. Melania ran in these
circles and probably knows Buti. Maybe she even liked that he (allegedly) stole from her
modeling competitors!
He did not dare to pardon people who went for him into the Capitol, he didn't pardon
Assange or Snowden, but surprisingly he pardoned a whole lot of Jewish cheats.
Trump could have assured himself a worthwhile legacy, but he listened to the same control
tools as he did throughout his presidency.
I doubt I'm alone in feeling somewhat betrayed. I say 'somewhat' because I certainly would
have been surprised if he did that – pleasantly surprised to be sure, but
surprised.
Sad.
R.C.
Before too many comments accumulate here, I just want to thank Ron Unz, the publisher, for
highlighting this general subject, now consistently. Many of us readers do indeed feel in our
bones that this is a turning point, and you, sir, deserve credit for recognizing the gravity
of this moment in American history. Thank you for placing stories and columns about this at
the top of your now-more-valuable-than-ever publication.
Do you have an alternate plan in case the powers that be try to silence you? I don't
understand how this works, but it would be pretty crazy not to have an alternative way to
publish "online" if you need one.
Maybe you could reassure us with some mention of the subject. (That would be edifying, if
it would not be too revealing. Whatever works. Let's just hope UR can go on. Some of us can
find no substitute.)
And thank you, Israel Shamir, for you work. This selection from today's seems particularly
relevant:
Mind you, I do not subscribe to the idea of Jewish supremacy and massive IQ. The
all-Jewish country of Israel is devastated by three lockdowns, by the biggest vaccination
drive in the world (86% already vaccinated), by an ongoing civil war of Zionist power
against Orthodox Jews who refuse lockdown and vaccination
Not quite masters of the universe. Just people with good PR.
You mean there is an obscure real power above the jews? The jews follow it's demands as
jesters? Who is this obscure power before whom the jews dance as jesters? Who is this great
king?
thing is that like unz, they gather everything you write and use it against you in the
long run. yeah we encourage you in every way. What they don't say is that everything you say
will be recorded and examined by artificial intelligence.
One of the main reasons you can comment here while not being able to comment in any of the
myriad fake sites of alternative right/left. Cuz they are absolutely designed, just like the
cbc.ca to not allow anyone with open opiones to
comment. They will close you down and delete your comments all the time to prevent ordinary
people from commenting on things of importance. To everyone and how much we make and how hard
we have to work for it and how much we hate the government taking it from us to spend on
political wars and ecological destruction (while lying about it all the time) Like how piss
poorly they handled Covid and how many lives that cost while those stupid shits fucked around
with politics. Lot of us knew that back in Jan/Feb last year. Lot of us knew that back then
and watched a tidal wave of protests from where? BLM and Antifa were cover stories financed
by rich people to cover the real indignation of ordinary people about how piss poorly our
governments were doing in relation to this virus which has pretty much smacked us back on our
socks.
It is what turned me off of politics completely. It is what made me realize that I have a far
better understanding of this virus than they do. It was commenting on the cbc with perhaps a
dozen far sighted citizens and being completely over-whelmed by political bots and
ignorance.
What is the answer? The answer is not to drink the koolaid. The answer is to look at your own
country and your own culture and support that. It may be a few decades but that it is what it
is going to return to. Or you could die. Good luck. You give that up and allow your culture
to be overwhelmed by violent, religiously motivated cultures from centuries ago then you
might just as well turn Hari Krishna, to avoid your criminal past and sell vegetarian recipe
books to people who would actually eat that shit. Y'all have a great day.
What a dog's breakfast of half truths and misdirections. Russians and Socialists are
always ready to cuck for jews. They are virtual pornstars of the night.
Y'all want a perfect example of a a fake left-wing site which is actually completely right
wing? Try theTyee.ca .
Looks left wing, smells left wing, has tons of trained porpoises and and other paid and
unpaid fools which support them.
Say a single thing about changing the political status quo and you are banned my friend. Good
luck arguing about it when when you are a monster in a horror flick and cannot say a single
word.
Putin is all too aware of Jewish perfidy for he knows the rotten treatment meted out to
Donald J Trump by the very people who got the most out of him.
Vlad won't make the same mistake and perhaps he might even set the world free by launching
a nuclear missile at the Silicon Valley to take out the "Big Five" before going down, unlike
hapless DJT!
He promoted sex-change for boys and girls.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- –
This is going to explode. Women are going to go crazy over this.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Why is it everyone is angry over a man competing in women's sports but no one is angry over
women competing in men's sports?
Trump's great merit – to me and some others – is that he ripped back the cloth
of gold that previously concealed the exalted office of the presidency, and showed everyone
all the horrible rotten decay underneath. Messrs Obama and Biden and the Clintons, in sharp
contrast, are enthusiastic guardians of the cloth of gold. In Jesus's day, they would have
been precisely the scribes and pharisees whom he despised and rebuked for their extreme
hypocrisy.
And that is equally the reason why so many hate Trump. They would have preferred the
hypocrisy to continue unchallenged, the whited sepulchres to remain unbroached.
I can count on my left-hand fingers people who write with empathy and correctly about
those who got depleted uranium bombs on their heads. Thank you for your genuine and valuable
service to the entire humanity and global justice. Good health.
Like the dishonest servant in the parables of Jesus, Trump is a wise man. As a man of the
world, he knows better than us how to make a place for himself after being thrown from the
palace. All this dealing was for continued wealth and freedom from serious prosecution, is my
thought.
Good for him. He can continue to poke at the pigs this way.
In 1990 they, or their parents listened to Yeltsin's calls to throw off the privileged
Communist rulers because they, the rulers, had it so good with cars, dachas, Western goods.
They paid for this response with ten of the most awful years our generation experienced
Now there is the World Economic Forum's annual meeting online, where the victors will
decide how to proceed with their Great Reset. Trump is not invited. In a few days, we shall
know more about their plans, and whether there are any forces we can hope and cheer for. At
present it does not appear there are. Despite their multiple disagreements, they agree
against us, so we all can disagree with them.
@notoneofthem
Cohen, CIA Deputy Director
3. Merrick Garland, Attorney General
4. Avril Haines, Director of National Intelligence
5. John Kerry, National Security Agency Special Climate Envoy (Jewish father)
6. Ronald Klain, White House Chief of Staff
7. Eric Lander, Office of Science and Technology Policy director
8. 'Rachel' Levine (trans-sexual), Deputy Health Secretary
9. Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security
10. Anne Neuberger, National Security Agency cybersecurity director
11. Wendy Sherman, Deputy Secretary of State
12. Janet Yellen, Treasury Secretary
I totally agree on the thank you to Ron Unz. This site is my go to site each and every
day. Not only for the articles, but also for all the great information and discussion from
the comments.
Revealing this thought tells us more about the author than it does Trump.
You (anyone) would have been more than half-way to understanding events over the last five
years by accepting that destroying Trump was the greatest dues ex machina for an array of
forces, foreign and domestic (US) as any of us have or will see in our lifetimes.
. . . though his last days in the White House were anything but inspirational.
I don't know how more obvious it needed to be for even intelligent observers to see the
lengths the aligned powers that be were willing to go to not just to deny Trump a second term
but to bring them down to their wholly discredited size.
To many it doesn't seem to matter that Trump foiled the Iranian/Democrat op to seize
American hostages in Bagdad in a replay of the Iranian Hostage Crisis which sunk Carter's
reelection in 1980, the first impeachment hoax that preceded it, and even the China
Virus.
These are only some of the plots we're aware of, and only since the end of 2019.
This entered a surreal phase after Trump won in a landslide despite their malefactions.
First a full court press to complete the steal, and then ever more ominous signaling about
the lengths they were willing to go in terms of a mass casualty event if Trump didn't
relent.
If you cannot see what culminated on 1/6/21 then a cannot help you. They were promoting
threats in "50 state capitols," purportedly from MAGA. This explains why Trump drew the focus
exclusively to the Elipse in DC by announcing just days before that he would speak at the
event. I think it also explains why he was late in starting to speak and was still doing so
when Pence's letter dropped.
This isn't the half of it because then they really amped up their not at all veiled
threats of mass death if Trump didn't resign immediately.
So before anyone even criticizes Trump, especially for nonsense like pardons, consider
what a monumental success his presidency was for what didn't happen, particularly in its last
days.
Why do you imagie that here are 50 states in the US and 32 Holocaust museums, yet there
are only 25 civil war museums. US population is 2% Jewish. Even universities in the US
understand that Jewish equity studies have a higher academic appeal than trans gender equity
studies.
Merchant of Vice updated: From the Merchant of Venice to the Merchant of Vice. A video
that looks at Epstein Island and its many visitors. Was this all an intelligence operation by
Mossad, Wexford and the US deep state or was it merely a diversion for the sensational media?
Will we ever know?
I've been wondering if the Walking Dead Democrats realize they are now the house servants
for a bunch of tech nerds. Just imagine they use to be party favors for bankers. Seems like a
demotion to me. Got to wonder if all those Nat'l Guardsmen were just there to make Congress
feel special one more time.
Concerning impeachment.
Trump is guilty because he should have known that in large crowd there will be trouble makers
who will sway the rest of the crowd to violence.
But all other politicians are guilty as well because they should have rung the alarm bells
and asked to secure the Capitol.
@Anonymous
Poor overmatched hologram Joe Biden reminds me of Konstantin Chernenko, who was appointed to
lead the crumbling Soviet Union in 1984. Both were in failing health, but Chernenko was 6
years younger. He only lasted 13 months before kicking the bucket. It's questionable if Biden
will even last that long.
One difference is that the USSR appointed an intelligent, capable man named Mikhail
Gorbachev to replace him. We have Kamala Harris. Despite Gorbachev's best efforts, communism
could not be saved, and he was forced to resign after 6 years in office. After Biden's death
or resignation, could this country continue to exist after 6 years of Kamala?
@Rahan
Rahan, we are not impressed with your Russian or ability to speak another language! As a
matter of fact I am sure many on this site find your linguistic tastes and silly pretensions
irritating and the rest find you clownish.
Many people here on this site are also bilingual. Should we all comment in our second
language expecting others to translate ?
This is an English site. Many of us do not have the time to translate your hodge podge
even if it takes a few seconds. You will note that Israel wrote IN ENGLISH !
Please comment in English you rude little cretin or find a site that publishes in Russian
!
Mr Shamir, great sarcasm elegantly wrapped in even greater prose. When I think of it, Jews
seem to me to be like typical bullies.
The typical thug does as he pleases for the longest while each time becoming more brazen.
The more people tolerate is the more he pushes his luck. Then one day everyone has enough and
all the frustrations of the multitude erupt with dreadful consequences for the bully.
It is the same with the current crop of rule makers. Its all a lot of fun to force silly
rules on regulations on others. What the legislators never seem to realise is that one day
those very rules come back on them. Then they cry out "Why me ? This is so unfair !"
As for Jews, it looks to me they get caught in their own snare time after time. How many
times have others just had enough of them and their antics. I looked at a video on Youtube by
Rabbi Yaron Reuven titled "Warning to Jews". People need to look at this.
In my opinion though Senior Citizen Joe is just the halfway point to utter disaster. As I
mentioned above, the chickens may well come home to roost and Joe could find himself booted
out by his own VP the "who knows what race she will be today Kamala. With her and some other
Afro female as her side kick we may all well agree that when we think things could not get
any worse, they usually do.
Like the dishonest servant in the parables of Jesus, Trump is a wise man. As a man of
the world, he knows better than us how to make a place for himself after being thrown from
the palace. All this dealing was for continued wealth and freedom from serious prosecution,
is my thought.
Very perceptive and interesting comment, Emslander. It definitely inspires further
thought. Thanks for that.
All of these competing narratives create an almost deafening whirlwind that sucks
everything down into a black hole. The truth is usually much simpler.
Please comment in English you rude little cretin or find a site that publishes in
Russian !
LOL
Not having a good day today, Marckus? I see you are busy in the Linh comment section as
well.
Drink a beer, smoke a cigar, watch the snow fall, relax, (I would say read some humor, but
the two humorous pieces on Unz today seem to have triggered you).
You may be right. But remember at the bottom of every slide is a space for a soft landing
to avoid injury.
With shit slides that "soft landing' is usually a huge shit hole. A soft landing for sure
but a sure fire chance of drowning.
We are gaily rocketing down the slide with play ground Joe in the lead. Right now we may
have some brown sprinkles on our clothes but it is going to be nothing compared to total
immersion.
Trump was the last wholly human statesman at the helm of the Republic, and he was
defeated by the mail-in vote.
Trump was defeated by Trump. If the Trump cabal had issues with the mail-in voting
processes in the states, they should have challenged those processes months before the
election.
Moreover, Trump is little more than a lazy, vulgarian gas-bag who did nothing to extend
his support beyond his deluded base. Given the doddering political hack that the Democrats
nominated, Trump should have coasted to a win.
It was Trump's narcissistic big mouth in which it was all about him that gave Biden an
undeserved victory.
BTW, when the Ponzi Scheme economy implodes and they wake Uncle Joe from his nap in the
Oval Office to tell him, Biden will wish he had never left his basement.
Ron should reach out to Andrew Anglin, who's heroically managed to keep The Daily
Stormer running after the full weight of the state and state aligned corporations was
thrown at him.
At the very least he should set up a Tor address for the UR.
@Marckus
e ' ). I was young ( in college ) when the Communism collapsed and I couldn't understand the
so-called ' shock therapy ' ( promoted by the West ) ' How could you impose to a poor/abused
country this: " In economics, shock therapy is the sudden release of price and currency
controls, withdrawal of state subsidies, and immediate trade liberalization within a country,
usually also including large-scale privatization of previously public-owned assets. " –
wikipedia. In other words, prices like in West and salaries like in East – a ' fair
competition ', isn't ?! I found out (shortly ) that was/is an ' innocent/legal ' description
of a theft/robbery of a country
@Billovskii
e was sentenced to decades in prison by the civil rights division of the DOJ. She served 10
years Trump pardoned her. So much for the great alliance between black criminals and Jewish
feminazis against White men.
Check out the January 12 redpill article about David Bailey, federal cop, just another
black man who killed another White woman. Asli Barrett was assisted to climb in the window by
John Sullivan, another black BLM activist seen in riots all over the country.
And White conservatives rage against black women's abortions and birth control because God
wants us to be overwhelmed and destroyed by blacks. .
If Jews were as clever as they think they are, they would not get themselves into this
no-win Covid war. The Swedish way remains the only way to deal with it, as a recent study
has proven beyond all possible doubt.
I'm surprised that so few have taken the time to compare Sweden's covid-1984 graphs vs the
graphs of countries that have gone the lockdown path. It doesn't even take a peer review
study to see that lockdowns are not helping anyone. The graphs themselves are a very easy way
to compare results.
What is now the Swedish way was once considered the normal way for everyone until someone
decided that countries were really prisons.
While US officials claim that 'far-right extremism' is one of the largest threats facing
America, the leader of the group most commonly singled out as an example - the Proud Boys -
was a 'prolific' informant for federal and local law enforcement, according to Reuters,
citing a 2014 federal court proceeding.
Enrique Tarrio repeatedly worked undercover for investigators following a 2012 arrest,
court documents reveal.
Curiously, Tarrio was ordered to stay away from Washington D.C. one day before the
January 6 Capitol riot after he was arrested on vandalism and weapons charges - upon a
request by government prosecutors that he be prohibited from attending. At least five Proud
Boys members were charged as part of the riot.
In the 2014 hearing, a federal prosecutor, an FBI agent and Tarrio's attorney describe
his undercover work - noting that the Proud Boys leader helped authorities prosecute over a
dozen people in various cases involving drugs, gambling and human smuggling, accoding to
Reuters.
In a Tuesday interview with Reuters, Tarrio denied working undercover or cooperating in
cases.
"I don't know any of this," he said, adding "I don't recall any of this."
[...]
During Tarrio's 2014 hearing, both the prosecutor and Tarrio's defense attorney asked
for a reduced prison sentence after pleading guilty in a fraud case related to the
relabeling and sale of stolen diabetes test kits. In requesting leniency for Tarrio and two
co-defendants, the prosecutor noted that Tarrio's information had resulted in the
prosecution of 13 people on federal charges in two separate cases, and helped local
authorities investigate a gambling ring.
The tell, the dead giveaway, is that the Proud Boys get promoted. They get headlines,
column inches, airtime. Product placement. No homegrown anything gets that attention. They
are a product being sold to us in the media. Apply same standard to BLM, AntiFa, Weathermen,
apply as much as you like and you will seldom be in error.
There's that line is the Costa Gavras film Z, where someone gets chided about being too
quick to blame CIA, and the instant comeback is always blame the CIA, even if you are wrong
you will likely end up right. And of course the Greek colonels were CIA, even if some were
not 100% sure until later. Same standard applies here. Any bogeyman the media stands up and
points to and says be very afraid of this bad bogey, this bogey here, you can be sure it is
fake from the start.
Yes, this whole policing business is just a lot easier if you cultivate and run your own
criminal gangs, and in fact that approach to it has been very popular almost everywhere. No
need to deal with any really dangerous people that way too, a big plus, and seasoned crooks
can be handy for dealing with your enemies, encouraging reluctant counter-parties, etc.
Enrique Tarrio, the leader of the Proud Boys extremist group, has a past as an informer for federal and local law enforcement,
repeatedly working undercover for investigators after he was arrested in 2012, according to a former prosecutor and a transcript
of a 2014 federal court proceeding obtained by Reuters.
In the Miami hearing, a federal prosecutor, a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and Tarrio's own lawyer described his
undercover work and said he had helped authorities prosecute more than a dozen people in various cases involving drugs, gambling
and human smuggling.
Tarrio, in an interview with Reuters on Tuesday, denied working undercover or cooperating in cases against others. "I don't know
any of this,'" he said, when asked about the transcript. "I don't recall any of this."
Law enforcement officials and the court transcript contradict Tarrio's denial. In a statement to Reuters, the former federal
prosecutor in Tarrio's case, Vanessa Singh Johannes, confirmed that "he cooperated with local and federal law enforcement, to aid
in the prosecution of those running other, separate criminal enterprises, ranging from running marijuana grow houses in Miami to
operating pharmaceutical fraud schemes".
Tarrio, 36, is a high-profile figure who organizes and leads the rightwing Proud Boys in their confrontations with those they
believe to be antifa, short for "anti-fascism", an amorphous leftist movement. The Proud Boys were involved in the deadly
insurrection at the Capitol on 6 January.
The records uncovered by Reuters are startling because they show that a leader of a far-right group now under intense scrutiny by
law enforcement was previously an active collaborator with criminal investigators.
Washington police arrested Tarrio in early January
when he arrived in the city two days before the Capitol Hill riot. He was
charged with possessing two high-capacity rifle magazines, and burning a Black Lives Matter banner during a December
demonstration by supporters of Donald Trump. The DC superior court ordered him to leave the city pending a court date in June.
Though Tarrio did not take part in the Capitol insurrection, at least five Proud Boys members have been charged in the riot. The
FBI
previously
said Tarrio's earlier arrest was an effort to pre-empt the events of 6 January.
The transcript from 2014 shines a new light on Tarrio's past connections to law enforcement. During the hearing, the prosecutor
and Tarrio's defense attorney asked a judge to reduce the prison sentence of Tarrio and two co-defendants. They had pleaded
guilty in a fraud case related to the relabeling and sale of stolen diabetes test kits.
The prosecutor said Tarrio's information had led to the prosecution of 13 people on federal charges in two separate cases, and
had helped local authorities investigate a gambling ring.
Tarrio's then lawyer Jeffrey Feiler said in court that his client had worked undercover in numerous investigations, one involving
the sale of anabolic steroids, another regarding "wholesale prescription narcotics" and a third targeting human smuggling. He
said Tarrio helped police uncover three marijuana grow houses, and was a "prolific" cooperator.
In the smuggling case, Tarrio, "at his own risk, in an undercover role met and negotiated to pay $11,000 to members of that ring
to bring in fictitious family members of his from another country", the lawyer said in court.
In an interview, Feiler said he did not recall details about the case but added, "The information I provided to the court was
based on information provided to me by law enforcement and the prosecutor."
An FBI agent at the hearing called Tarrio a "key component" in local police investigations involving marijuana, cocaine and MDMA,
or ecstasy. The Miami FBI office declined comment.
A Proud Boy displays an 'Enrique Tarrio Did Nothing Wrong' shirt as Trump supporters gather for the 'Stop The Steal' rally that
preceded the Capitol assault on 6 January
Photograph: Amy Harris/Rex/Shutterstock
There is no evidence Tarrio has cooperated with authorities since then. In interviews with Reuters, however, he said that before
rallies in various cities, he would let police departments know of the Proud Boys' plans. It is unclear if this was actually the
case. He said he stopped this coordination after 12 December because the DC police had cracked down on the group.
Tarrio on Tuesday acknowledged that his fraud sentence was reduced, from 30 months to 16 months, but insisted that leniency was
provided only because he and his co-defendants helped investigators "clear up" questions about his own case. He said he never
helped investigate others.
That comment contrasts with statements made in court by the prosecutor, his lawyer and the FBI. The judge in the case, Joan A
Lenard, said Tarrio "provided substantial assistance in the investigation and prosecution of other persons involved in criminal
conduct".
As Trump supporters challenged the Republican's election loss in often violent demonstrations, Tarrio stood out for his swagger
as he led crowds of mostly white Proud Boys in a series of confrontations and street brawls in Washington DC, Portland, Oregon
and elsewhere.
The Proud Boys, founded in 2016, began as a group protesting against political correctness and perceived constraints on
masculinity. It grew into a group with distinctive colors of yellow and black that embraced street fighting. In September their
profile soared when Trump called on them to "Stand back and stand by."
Tarrio, based in Miami, became the national chairman of the group in 2018.
In November and December, Tarrio led the Proud Boys through the streets of DC after Trump's loss. Video shows him on 11 December
with a bullhorn in front of a large crowd. "To the parasites both in Congress, and in that stolen White House,'" he said. "You
want a war, you got one!" The crowd roared. The next day Tarrio burned the BLM banner.
Former prosecutor Johannes said she was surprised that the defendant she prosecuted for fraud is now a key player in the violent
movement that sought to halt the certification of President Joe Biden.
"I knew that he was a fraudster, but had no reason to know that he was also a domestic terrorist," she said.
After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, horrified Americans were ready to embrace virtually any proposal that promised to keep them
safe. Government officials, for their part, were eager to curry favor with the fearful public and saw an opportunity to
promote legislation and policies that had failed to win support in the past. The result was a surge of authoritarianism from
which the U.S. has yet to recover. Now -- with the public understandably concerned after the January 6 storming of the Capitol -- we
should brace ourselves for another wave of political responses that would, again, erode our liberty.
"We're going to have to figure out how we rein in our media environment so that you can't just spew disinformation and
misinformation," Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.)
told
her Instagram followers
this week. "It's one thing to have differing opinions but it's another thing entirely to just say
things that are false. So that's something that we're looking into."
The socialist lawmaker isn't always careful about her words, but it's worrying when officials talk about a need to "rein in"
the media in any context. There's really no way to cast government action to that end in a good light, no matter what policy
tools are intended (Ocasio-Cortez's office hasn't responded to a request for comment). To let government agencies "rein in"
the media is to put control over speech and the press in the hands of people who always see benefit in less scrutiny and
criticism of their own activities.
That free speech might well take a hit is apparent from the pasting law enforcement is getting for, allegedly, being too
considerate of First Amendment rights before the events at the Capitol.
"FBI intelligence analysts gathered information about possible violence involving the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6., but the FBI
never distributed a formal intelligence bulletin, in part because of concerns that doing so might have run afoul of free
speech protections," NBC News
reported
on
Tuesday.
The report goes on to reveal that in preparing for the protest that degenerated into a riot, the FBI
did
share
intelligence with other law enforcement agencies, neglecting only to issue a formal Joint Intelligence Bulletin. But the
overall impression left by NBC and by the behind-the-scenes leaks from officialdom on which its reporting is based are that
respect for free speech got in the way.
Since then, the FBI has made up for lost time,
issuing
a bulletin
highlighting the "threat of violence" from a range of "ideologically diverse" extremists. The danger is real,
as the violence of January 6 demonstrated. But so is the danger of an unrestrained federal agency with a
history
of
interference in domestic policy debates, spying on activists, and even trying to sabotage political parties -- revealed in great
detail by the 1976
Church
Committee report
. An FBI stung for being too respectful of individual rights in the recent past may return to its old
habits in the future.
In its efforts, the FBI and its allied agencies are almost certain to have the support of the new president. After the
storming of the Capitol, President-elect Joe Biden was harsh in his description of the participants. "Don't dare call them
protesters," he
said
.
"They were a riotous mob. Insurrectionists. Domestic terrorists. It's that basic. It's that simple."
Biden's choice of language is interesting because, even before the election, his campaign promised to "
work
for a domestic terrorism law
" -- an idea
reportedly
favored
by his close advisors. What a new law would look like isn't clear, but Biden has a history with such legislation.
After the 9/11 attacks, Biden claimed authorship of the
Patriot
Act
, which has been much criticized for the damage it does to civil liberties in the name of combating foreign terrorism.
"I drafted a terrorism bill after the Oklahoma City bombing," he
told
The
New Republic
in October 2001. "And the bill John Ashcroft sent up was my bill."
The uses to which the Patriot Act has been put since its passage should be warning enough to be wary of any legislation
proposed in response to the events of January 6.
"The Patriot Act was the first of many changes to surveillance laws that made it easier for the government to spy on ordinary
Americans by expanding the authority to monitor phone and email communications, collect bank and credit reporting records, and
track the activity of innocent Americans on the Internet," the American Civil Liberties Union
summarizes
.
"While most Americans think it was created to catch terrorists, the Patriot Act actually turns regular citizens into
suspects."
"This is really a debate about the standard our government should have to meet in order to obtain personal information about
individuals from banks, hospitals, libraries, retail stores, gun shops, and other institutions," Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)
argued
about
ongoing controversies surround the Patriot Act in 2011. "Government agents should not be able to collect this sort of
information on law abiding American citizens without showing that they have at least some connection to terrorism or other
nefarious activities."
Twenty years after its passage, the Patriot Act lingers on, still threatening civil liberties.
"The government has interpreted a high-profile provision of the Patriot Act as empowering F.B.I. national security
investigators to collect logs showing who has visited particular web pages," Charlie Savage of
The
New York Times
reported
just
last month. "New tensions have emerged over the extent to which the F.B.I. could use that law to gather logs of people's web
browsing activities, as opposed to using warrants -- a tool that requires investigators to first be able to produce evidence
that a person probably engaged in wrongdoing," he added.
Despite much moaning about the absence of a domestic terrorism law, the Patriot Act has had considerable and very intrusive
domestic impact on Americans' privacy.
The fallout from 9/11 also brought us amendments to the
Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act
, which authorized mass surveillance campaigns that were exposed by Edward Snowden and
ruled
unconstitutional
only last September. We saw the establishment of the
simultaneously
creepy and incompetent
Department of Homeland Security, and the further transformation of air travel into an ordeal under
the groping guidance of the
Transportation
Security Administration
. All of this was presented to a frightened public as part of a necessary response to the attacks
in hopes that nobody would notice that the proposals had been gathering dust on shelves, just waiting for an opening.
"Many of the changes have precious little to do with the dangers that we saw on September 11," George Washington University
Law School's Jonathan Turley
told
PBS
in 2002. "Many of those things are part of a wish list of intelligence agencies that they've wanted for decades."
Given that government officials' wish list of expanded powers are endless, and that they were
calling
for new laws
well before the storming of the Capitol, we should expect a flurry of legislative proposals in the weeks and
months to come. We'll need to scrutinize them very closely, on the assumption that they'll be as dangerous to freedom as past
schemes to protect us from risks real and imagined.
Looks like Dominion now can capitalize on Jan 6 events...
Notable quotes:
"... The lawsuit was filed in the Federal District Court in Washington, DC on Monday. The massive 107-page document lists over 50 statements from Giuliani which he made on Twitter, his podcast, in the media, and during legislative hearings about Dominion – one of the largest companies selling voting machines used in the US. ..."
"... To illustrate the damage presumably done by Giuliani, the lawsuit provides a long list of screenshots from assorted internet uses, primarily from Twitter, fuming at Dominion and accusing it of facilitating the election "steal." The voting machines and sharp spikes in vote counts in favor of Joe Biden, widely attributed to the system, have been among the centerpieces of conspiracy theories for the pro-Trump crowd in the aftermath of the turbulent election. ..."
"... The lawsuit also highlights Giuliani's role in the January 6 Capitol Hill riot, accusing him of stirring up the violence. The document quotes Giuliani's address at the pro-Trump rally shortly before the violence, when he urged supporters to engage in "trial by combat." ..."
Donald
Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani is being sued by Dominion Voting Systems over claims of fraud
during the 2020 US presidential election. The company is seeking $1.3 billion in compensatory
and punitive damages.
The lawsuit was filed in the Federal District Court in Washington, DC on Monday. The massive
107-page document lists over 50 statements from Giuliani which he made on Twitter, his podcast,
in the media, and during legislative hearings about Dominion – one of the largest
companies selling voting machines used in the US.
Giuliani, like many other prominent supporters of former President Donald Trump, has
repeatedly pointed the finger at the company as one of the main culprits behind Trump's
election loss. Dominion has been accused of being part of an alleged plot to fix the election
in favor of the Democrats, which, alongside mass mail-in voting, allegedly facilitated the
"steal" of Trump's presumed 'victory'.
Dominion has accused Giuliani of waging a "viral disinformation campaign" and
repeatedly producing "defamatory falsehoods" about it. It also claimed the allegedly
false statements from Trump's lawyer have stirred up a storm of death threats against its
employees.
To illustrate the damage presumably done by Giuliani, the lawsuit provides a long list of
screenshots from assorted internet uses, primarily from Twitter, fuming at Dominion and
accusing it of facilitating the election "steal." The voting machines and sharp spikes
in vote counts in favor of Joe Biden, widely attributed to the system, have been among the
centerpieces of conspiracy theories for the pro-Trump crowd in the aftermath of the turbulent
election.
The lawsuit also highlights Giuliani's role in the January 6 Capitol Hill riot, accusing him
of stirring up the violence. The document quotes Giuliani's address at the pro-Trump rally
shortly before the violence, when he urged supporters to engage in "trial by
combat."
The company is seeking at least $1.3 billion in compensatory and punitive damages from
Giuliani, demanding a trial by jury, according to the court documents.
The lawsuit against Giuliani largely resembles the one against another pro-Trump lawyer,
Sidney Powell, filed by the company earlier this month. Powell has been accused of waging a
"viral disinformation campaign" as well, with Dominion seeking the same eye-watering sum
of 1.3 billion in damages from her.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
"Election results in a county in Michigan had to be corrected to show that President Trump
won by nearly 2,000 votes after voting software gave 6,000 of his votes to Biden ." Which
probably never would have been check if Antrim County wasn't such a Red county. Hard to find
fraud when you refuse to look for it.
LeRuscino2 Sue Brown 11 hours ago 25 Jan, 2021 11:08 AM
Exactly - Scream & shout 1st like MH-17 & when it's settled & Guiliani wins
nobody will know or even remember.
Banalucki 3 hours ago 25 Jan, 2021 07:46 PM
so classic americana - the business that created an electronic voting "process" that
eliminates chain of custody protection, signatures and voter ID is suing Rudy for "fraud"...
Thomas51 2 hours ago 25 Jan, 2021 08:26 PM
Political actions of any lawyer should bear consequences
VonnDuff1 2 hours ago 25 Jan, 2021 08:01 PM
SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Policy) and nothing more. Unless you throw in
Kangaroo Courts with Monkey Judges.
Trekker 8 hours ago 25 Jan, 2021 02:36 PM
Good to put Giuliani away once and for all for all the damage he has caused.
GottaBeMe Skeptic076 7 hours ago 25 Jan, 2021 03:39 PM
They'll have to audit the computer code finally. And they'll have to do it using machines in
swing states that haven't been touched since November. Otherwise it's them saying one thing,
Giuliani saying something else.
Pete Wagner 7 hours ago 25 Jan, 2021 03:11 PM
I guess that means they've destroyed all the damning evidence and have their judge briefed,
paid off, and ready to rule.
Sue Brown 12 hours ago 25 Jan, 2021 10:53 AM
Typical USA style, don't defend yourself . . . when wronged = SUE!!!!
Enki14 9 hours ago 25 Jan, 2021 01:54 PM
Methinks this is a publicity stunt as they would not want a jury of Powell's peers to see the
evidence Patrick Byrne PH.D. has amassed and the hundreds of witnesses that would be called
to testify on Powell's behalf. Methinks they managed to destroy the evidence on their hard
drives and thus feel the evidence would be viewed as circumstantial. However the pathways are
real, were tracked and saved.
As Democrats plunge ahead with a post-term impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, a
key question remains: Will Chief Justice Roberts take the case?
Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky says he won't -- making
the exercise "a fake, partisan impeachment," the lawmaker told Fox News' Sean Hannity
Friday.
Paul claimed Roberts has "privately said he's not supposed to come unless it's an
impeachment of the president."
According to the US Constitution, "when the President of the United States is tried, the
Chief Justice shall preside" -- a requirement not made for any other impeachment case.
"Congress is going to do what Congress does," Ashley Etienne, Vice President Kamala Harris'
communications director, told MSNBC Saturday.
One thing Trump enemies in Congress appear to be doing is grasping at straws -- even
reaching back to a post-Civil War amendment.
Several Dems have
floated the idea of punishing Trump with the 14th Amendment's rule that shuts those who
"engaged in insurrection or rebellion" out of elective office.
"I certainly think there is a 14th Amendment avenue separate and aside from impeachment,"
Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy
told The Hill .
But the stricture, which was written to prevent former Confederate loyalists from regaining
power as the United States struggled through Reconstruction, has not been used since -- and
would
spark a long judicial battle if Congress attempted to invoke it, legal experts say.
Meanwhile, with Trump no longer in the White House, Republicans like Paul continued to
deride the impeachment as "an illegitimate procedure."
Roberts, who has not said publicly whether he will preside over the trial, has two more
weeks to decide.
After the House of Representatives' impeachment managers on Monday read their articles of
impeachment accusing Trump of inciting the deadly Jan. 6 riot, the Senate will
delay the trial until the week of Feb. 8 so that President Biden can get his administration
up and running, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer announced Friday.
If Trump is convicted with a two-thirds majority of the Senate, Schumer could call for a
second vote, this one requiring only a simple majority, barring him from holding elective
office again.
But conviction will require the votes of at least 17 Senate Republicans -- an increasingly
remote possibility, as more party members climb aboard Paul's argument that only a sitting
president can be impeached.
"It's going to be tough to get even a handful" of GOP defectors, Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.)
told
CNN -- because "everybody has views that it's kind of a constitutional concern."
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., on Sunday called the impeachment trial of former President Donald
Trump "stupid" and "counterproductive".
In an interview on "Fox News Sunday," Rubio
said "we already having a flaming fire in this country, and it's like take a bunch of gasoline
and pouring it on top of the fire."
"First of all, I think the trial is stupid. It's counterproductive," Rubio declared.
"Second, I look back at a time, for example, Richard Nixon, who had clearly committed crimes
and wrongdoing, and in hindsight I think we would all agree that President Ford's pardon was
important for the country to be able to move forward," he added. "And history held Richard
Nixon quite accountable for what he did as a result."
Rubio said Trump does bear "responsibility for some of what happened."
"It was most certainly a foreseeable consequence of everything that was going on," Rubio
said. "All I'm arguing is we have some really important things to work on. ... We're gonna jump
right back into what we've been going through for the last five years, and stirring it up again
with a trial, and it's just going to be bad for the country."
Democrats introduce their first bill in the House: H.R.1 – The bill that will destroy
America. Nationwide mail-in voting, banning restrictions on ballot harvesting, banning voter
ID, criminal voters,DC Statehood roadwork, it's all in here.
1) Internet-only registration with electronic signature submission.
Advertisement - story continues below
"(a) Requiring Availability Of Internet For Online Registration. -- Each State, acting
through the chief State election official, shall ensure that the following services are
available to the public at any time on the official public websites of the appropriate State
and local election officials in the State, in the same manner and subject to the same terms and
conditions as the services provided by voter registration agencies under section 7(a):
"(1) Online application for voter registration.
2) Banning the requirement to provide a full SSN for voter registration.
SEC. 1005. PROHIBITING STATE FROM REQUIRING APPLICANTS TO PROVIDE MORE THAN LAST 4 DIGITS OF
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER. (a) Form Included With Application For Motor Vehicle Driver's License.
-- Section 5(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C.
20504(c)(2)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting the
following: ", and to the extent that the application requires the applicant to provide a Social
Security number, may not require the applicant to provide more than the last 4 digits of such
number;".
Note that motor voter registration is how thousands of illegal became registered voters
in California and Nevada.
(2) DEFINITION. -- The term "automatic registration" means a system that registers an
individual to vote in elections for Federal office in a State, if eligible, by electronically
transferring the information necessary for registration from government agencies to election
officials of the State so that, unless the individual affirmatively declines to be registered,
the individual will be registered to vote in such elections.
4) 16 year olds required to be registered to vote.
(d) Treatment Of Individuals Under 18 Years Of Age. -- A State may not refuse to treat an
individual as an eligible individual for purposes of this part on the grounds that the
individual is less than 18 years of age at the time a contributing agency receives information
with respect to the individual, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of age at such
time. Nothing in the previous sentence may be construed to require a State to permit an
individual who is under 18 years of age at the time of an election for Federal office to vote
in the election.
"(1) REGISTRATION. -- Each State shall permit any eligible individual on the day of a
Federal election and on any day when voting, including early voting, is permitted for a Federal
election --
"(A) to register to vote in such election at the polling place using a form that meets the
requirements under section 9(b) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (or, if the
individual is already registered to vote, to revise any of the individual's voter registration
information); and
"(B) to cast a vote in such election.
Advertisement - story continues below
6) Grants ($25M) for using minors in election activities.
(1) IN GENERAL. -- The Election Assistance Commission (hereafter in this section referred to
as the "Commission") shall make grants to eligible States to enable such States to carry out a
plan to increase the involvement of individuals under 18 years of age in public election
activities in the State.
7) More children voters.
"(k) Acceptance Of Applications From Individuals Under 18 Years Of Age. --
Advertisement - story continues below
"(1) IN GENERAL. -- A State may not refuse to accept or process an individual's application
to register to vote in elections for Federal office on the grounds that the individual is under
18 years of age at the time the individual submits the application, so long as the individual
is at least 16 years of age at such time.
8) Prohibiting attempts to clean voter rolls of non-residents.
It's this whole section, but in particular, this part below basically says nobody is
allowed to request voter rolls to be cleaned up. ie: making it illegal to do what Tom Fitton
was doing.
"(1) REQUIREMENTS FOR CHALLENGES. -- No person, other than a State or local election
official, shall submit a formal challenge to an individual's eligibility to register to vote in
an election for Federal office or to vote in an election for Federal office unless that
challenge is supported by personal knowledge regarding the grounds for ineligibility which is
--
Advertisement - story continues below
9) Murderers and rapists can vote.
(1) NOTIFICATION. -- On the date determined under paragraph (2), each State shall notify in
writing any individual who has been convicted of a criminal offense under the law of that State
that such individual has the right to vote in an election for Federal office pursuant to the
Democracy Restoration Act of 2021 and may register to vote in any such election and provide
such individual with any materials that are necessary to register to vote in any such
election.
10) Mandatory early voting.
Note that I personally like early voting in Florida, but putting it here anyway.
Advertisement - story continues below
"(1) IN GENERAL. -- Each State shall allow individuals to vote in an election for Federal
office during an early voting period which occurs prior to the date of the election, in the
same manner as voting is allowed on such date.
11) THE BIG ONE – NATIONWIDE VOTE BY
MAIL, BAN ON BALLOT PROTECTION MEASURES, LEGALIZED LIMITLESS BALLOT HARVESTING.
"SEC. 307. PROMOTING ABILITY OF VOTERS TO VOTE BY MAIL.
"(a) Uniform Availability Of Absentee Voting To All Voters. --
Advertisement - story continues below
"(1) IN GENERAL. -- If an individual in a State is eligible to cast a vote in an election
for Federal office, the State may not impose any additional conditions or requirements on the
eligibility of the individual to cast the vote in such election by absentee ballot by mail.
"(2) ADMINISTRATION OF VOTING BY MAIL. --
"(A) PROHIBITING IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT AS CONDITION OF OBTAINING BALLOT. -- A State may
not require an individual to provide any form of identification as a condition of obtaining an
absentee ballot, except that nothing in this paragraph may be construed to prevent a State from
requiring a signature of the individual or similar affirmation as a condition of obtaining an
absentee ballot.
"(B) PROHIBITING REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE NOTARIZATION OR WITNESS SIGNATURE AS CONDITION OF
OBTAINING OR CASTING BALLOT. -- A State may not require notarization or witness signature or
other formal authentication (other than voter attestation) as a condition of obtaining or
casting an absentee ballot.
Advertisement - story continues below
"(2) PERMITTING VOTERS TO DESIGNATE OTHER PERSON TO RETURN BALLOT. -- The State --
"(A) shall permit a voter to designate any person to return a voted and sealed absentee
ballot to the post office, a ballot drop-off location, tribally designated building, or
election office so long as the person designated to return the ballot does not receive any form
of compensation based on the number of ballots that the person has returned and no individual,
group, or organization provides compensation on this basis; and
"(B) may not put any limit on how many voted and sealed absentee ballots any designated
person can return to the post office, a ballot drop off location, tribally designated building,
or election office.
12) Banning voter ID.
Advertisement - story continues below
"(1) IN GENERAL. -- Except as provided in subsection (c), if a State has in effect a
requirement that an individual present identification as a condition of receiving and casting a
ballot in an election for Federal office, the State shall permit the individual to meet the
requirement --
"(A) in the case of an individual who desires to vote in person, by presenting the
appropriate State or local election official with a sworn written statement, signed by the
individual under penalty of perjury, attesting to the individual's identity and attesting that
the individual is eligible to vote in the election; or
13) Roadwork for DC statehood and territory statehood.
Deep State Mitch McConnell is proposing to postpone the second bogus
impeachment trial, which is based on a total fabrication, until February, under the guise 'to give president Trump more time
to prepare his defense'.
Mitch
McConnell won his Senate election in Kentucky in November, only with the support of President Trump, and came back to
Washington DC loaded for bear. He's not after the Democrats, who stole the election in thousands of different ways. He has
not said a word about the election being stolen. McConnell doesn't even consider that a review of the election fraud would
likely lead to many of the Republican Senators who lost in November having new elections or outright being awarded the wins in
the states where Democrats won.
McConnell didn't show a commitment to helping the people of America who have been destroyed by COVID because he wouldn't even
provide more than $600 for COVID relief for Americans suffering from shutdowns. Instead McConnell aligned himself with the
Democrat Party.
McConnell has done all he could to slander, disparage and destroy President Trump and the 79 million who voted for him.
(McConnell doesn't realize this is the old Republican Party and then some).
Today
McConnell announced that he is planning to move the bogus impeachment of President Trump to February. McConnell doesn't
realize that any Senators who vote to remove the President from any future terms in office will be replaced. It also will be
the final nail in the coffin of the Republican Party.
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) proposed on a call with Republican senators Thursday that former President
Trump's impeachment trial be delayed until February to give him enough time to mount a defense.
McConnell told colleagues that Trump should have at least as much time as the president had in previous trials, which means
he would like to postpone the proceeding until the second week of February, according to Republican senators on the call.
"It would have been the 10th or 11th [of February] or somewhere
in there," said Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.), who said McConnell wants to give Trump the same amount of time he had to prepare
for the first impeachment trial and that former President Clinton had to prepare for his 1999 impeachment trial.
Advertisement - story continues below
But
Republican Senators McConnell and Braun are both lost in DC. Americans who voted for the President in numbers never seen
before by any Presidential candidate, (when accounting for valid votes) are livid that the election got stolen. They're livid
the Democrats staged the riots in the Capitol on January 6th and they are livid Republicans are working with the Democrats,
who stole the election in the greatest heist in world history, to attack the victim, President Trump rather than work for
justice.
Also,
it's a shock Senator Braun, who would not be a Senator if it wasn't for President Trump, doesn't know that Bill Clinton was
under investigation by an independent counsel for years and then was impeached in the House in a process after the independent
counsel identified crimes Clinton had committed. The impeachment of Clinton was supported by laws and a process. This latest
impeachment of President Trump is based on lies and a few hours for Democrats to put together papers. There was no due
process.
Washington DC is a mess. The Democrats have stolen an election and
Republicans are allowing it and saying nothing. Americans are quickly seeing that a new party that works for the people is
the remedy.
Submit a Correction
Share
on
Facebook
Tweet
Share
Email
Joe Hoft
Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP's founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and
have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the
world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or
designations and is the author of three books. His new book: 'In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics'
is out now - please take a look and buy a copy.
The senate is not "supposed" to do investigations and discovery . Kavanaugh was the first . The house is
supposed to deliver a completed case. But , that's just the constitution. Who really cares about that
anymore ?
Turtle should have thrown out first faux impeachment, and he should have tossed this
second bogus one. Mcconnell needs to be made aware that china mitch is an enemy to the
Republican party and to the millions of Patriots who support President Trump.
The republican party is trash. Trump didn't run as a libertarian because he would've
never won. Republicans didn't elect Trump, Americans did. Republicans can f off with
the rest of them. They're all trash.
Now that Trump easily has 100 million new party members, let's remove the traitors.
I don't think Hawley or the other 3 voted to certify. You left off Ted Cruz & I'm sure he didn't' vote to certify.
These are the only true patriots left in the GOP.
Yes, there they did go, again. And when Reagan said that, he canceled millions of American's ability to get SS
survivor's benefits (death of a parent) during their university studies, and delayed how long you have to "keep
working" into old-age, to get full benefits - so less time to enjoy life, after a lifetime of work for the system.
"Oh, but that was a bipartisan commission," he told Mondale, in the debate - about the law HE Signed, to keep the
Ponzi-Scheme going - when they could have simply pulled the caps off, so the Mega-Rich didn't get to avoid paying
SS-Taxes on MOST of Their income - while working/middle class folks (up to $200+K) pay on ALL of theirs.
The Same Old GOPeee Schmiel, as Reagan WRECKED middle-class wages, and Shamnestied Millions of Illegal-Alien
Invaders - making Americans poor and desperate enough to vote for communism.
I'm for tax cuts - Raise the Personal Deduction on ALL types of taxes.
"... Not surprisingly, Blinken is a favorite of the AIPAC-bankrolled Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, which, as Phil Giraldi reported , Tweeted that Blinken would be part of a " superb national security team. The country will be very fortunate to have them in public service." ..."
"... We have Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) to thank for at least bringing up the fact that Blinken has blundered from foreign policy disaster to foreign policy disaster – which only gets you promoted in Washington DC. In Blinken's confirmation hearing, Paul reminded Blinken of his addiction to intervention in the Middle East and how that has worked out for everyone. ..."
"... Yes, Senator Paul is right. "Regime change" doesn't work. It kills or destroys the lives of the most vulnerable. The poor and the innocent. The US enemies may occasionally find themselves on the wrong end of a noose or a knife rape , but it is the civilians who always suffer when they are "liberated" by Washington. ..."
"... Buckle up, as incoming Senate Majority Leader Schumer advised, there's a whole lot of interventionism in the queue. There's a whole lot of death and destruction to be unleashed by Biden, Blinken, and their gang of " humanitarians ." ..."
While the saccharine continues to ooze from the mainstream media for the incoming Biden
Administration, the real iron fist of what will be the Biden foreign policy is starting to
materialize. As if on cue, major bombings in Baghdad – by ISIS remember them? –
have
opened the door for the Biden Administration to not only cancel President Trump's troop
drawdown from Iraq but to actually begin sending troops back into Iraq.
Is this to be Iraq War 4.0? 3.7? 5.0? Anybody's guess.
If Biden uses this sudden – and convenient – unrest in Iraq as a trigger to
return US troops (and bombs), it should not surprise anyone. As Professor Barbara Ransby points
out in this video , Biden did much
more to make the disastrous 2003 attack on Iraq happen than just vote "yes" on the
authorization to use force. As Professor Ransby reminds us, Biden used the full power of his
position as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to ensure the Senate approved
George W. Bush's lie-based war on Iraq. Biden prevented any experts who challenged the "Saddam
has WMDs and he's about to use them" narrative from being heard by Members of Congress,
guaranteeing that only the pro-war narrative was heard.
As much as Bush or Cheney, Biden owns the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, which killed a million
Iraqi civilians. And he may well be taking us back.
One figure in the Biden Administration who will play a pivotal role in returning the US to
its hyper-interventionism in the Middle East is Secretary of State nominee Anthony Blinken . As
a Biden Senate staffer in 2003, he helped the then-Foreign Relations Committee Chairman put
together a pro-war coalition in the Democratic Party to support President Bush's Republican
push for invasion.
Later on Blinken was Obama's Deputy National Security Advisor, where he successfully made
the case that destroying both Libya and Syria were fantastic ideas. Both countries drowned in
the Obama Administration's "liberation" bloodbath and neither country has recovered from the
"democracy" brought by Washington, but being a neocon foreign policy ideologue means never
having to say you're sorry.
And Blinken isn't.
Not surprisingly, Blinken is a favorite of the AIPAC-bankrolled Foundation for the Defense
of Democracies, which, as Phil Giraldi reported ,
Tweeted that Blinken would be part of a " superb national security team. The country will be
very fortunate to have them in public service."
We have Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) to thank for at least bringing up the fact that Blinken has
blundered from foreign policy disaster to foreign policy disaster – which only gets you
promoted in Washington DC. In Blinken's confirmation hearing, Paul reminded Blinken of his
addiction to intervention in the Middle East and how that has worked out for everyone.
Paul reminded the Secretary of State nominee that his only criticism of the Syria "regime
change" plan was that the US did not successfully overthrow Assad. But the US was using
jihadist proxies to overthrow the
secular Assad , so what does this say about Blinken's judgement?
"The lesson of these wars," said
Paul , is that 'regime change' doesn't work!"
Paul added:
Even after Libya you guys went on to Syria wanting to do the same thing again it's a
disaster.
You got rid of one 'bad guy' and another 'bad guy' got stronger.
Yes, Senator Paul is right. "Regime change" doesn't work. It kills or destroys the lives of
the most vulnerable. The poor and the innocent. The US enemies may occasionally find themselves
on the wrong end of a
noose or a
knife rape , but it is the civilians who always suffer when they are "liberated" by
Washington.
Buckle up, as incoming Senate Majority Leader Schumer advised, there's a whole lot of
interventionism in the queue. There's a whole lot of death and destruction to be unleashed by
Biden, Blinken, and their gang of " humanitarians ."
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your
email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
"... One of the authors cited Wall Street, banks and voting as examples of guaranteed fraud, because it's so easy – naive stupidity on our part knows no bounds. That includes me! It all took place under CIA watch! ..."
So what? Has there been any legal action actually being done against Dominion and the
election? How about some simple audited vote recounting? As I recall in 2016 Jill Stein had
both audits and recounts beginning two weeks after the election. Donald Trump hasn't done
anything other than golf.
Whining is just meant to stir us up because the deep staters really
want the right white wing to go hot. Can you imagine how sad they would be if their planned
color flag revolution violent stage mean't they would have to kill off some of their
miscreant human assets? All that work down the drain because of some damn stubborn white
people.
For the record, I really want to be wrong on this.
First, I want to thank a commenter on another site last week who provided a link to Gary
North's report on computerized electoral fraud – talk about making ballot stuffing easy
and hard to prove!
So I posted this thread in DaLimbraw Library – https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2020/11/beyond-shameful-why-it-all-developed.html?m=0
– it shows that it goes back decades to the 60's. In fact, DaBastahds who understood
computer systems were salivating to start computerized voting fraud almost immediately and
improved their techniques constantly to this day.
Shit, any dummy with basic coding skills could probably do it! North has documented
examples.
One whistleblower, for example, asserts that Pat Buchanan was gypped in the 96 AZ primary in
favor of Dole – computerized 'glitches'?
We've all heard 'Garbage in-garbage out' – if you think about it, considering the
intelligence of the average voting dumbquat, it would be impossible NOT to have computerized
fraud – undetected!
Most of us trust those screens we stare at – forgetting totally that we're being
programmed to trust them – while being manipulated.
Did you ever notice the 'coincidence' of computer dependent fraud in three institutions?
One of the authors cited Wall Street, banks and voting as examples of guaranteed fraud,
because it's so easy – naive stupidity on our part knows no bounds. That includes
me!
It all took place under CIA watch!
How can you conduct a successful audit or recount when the secret ballots were separated
from the envelops they came in when they were opened? There is no way to tell who the
individual voters voted for. That's why democrats insisted on mail-in ballots, using the
(deadly?) corona virus as their excuse. It seems that voting at the polls on election day is
for republican chumps. BTW, Jill Stein's recounts in 2016 went nowhere.
"... "The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur. We never had any presentation in court where we ever looked at the evidence..." ..."
"... '75% of Republicans want to look at election integrity,' Paul responds. Stephanopoulos responds by saying that those 75% agree with him because they were "fed a big lie" from the President. ..."
"... Paul pushed back, telling Stephanopoulos: "You immediately say everything's a lie instead of saying there's two sides to everything. Historically what would happen is if I said I thought there was fraud, you'd interview someone else who said there wasn't. But now you insert yourself in the middle and say that the absolute fact is that everything I'm saying is a lie." ..."
"... You gotta ask the question of Rand here though, even as a lone voice of reason that Rand Paul is he and the Trump supporting Senators failed the Republic. They needed to push forward and introduce the Election Fraud evidence after the Jan. 6 planned interruption of the evidence hearing. Why didn't the Election fraud evidence get its day in front of Congress? The Fraud needed to be part of the historical record, and it was not. ..."
"... South Philly judge of elections admits he took bribes to stuff the ballot box for Democratic candidates ..."
"... The problem is that there are only a few decent human beings in the Republic leadership who are not entirely in the pocket of the RNC, which is entirely in the pocket of the globalists. ..."
"... The MSM has given up the pretense of being journalists. They are full-fledged propagandist attack dogs and proud of it. ..."
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) took to ABC on Sunday morning with George Stephanopoulos to discuss
election integrity of the 2020 election, in a discussion which immediately devolved into an
inquisition during which Paul was repeatedly pressed to disavow clams that the election was
stolen.
Paul not only pushed back -- he put Stephanopoulos in his place, accusing the host of
'inserting yourself in the middle' and 'forgetting who you are as a journalist.'
Stephanopoulos began by asking Paul to admit the "election was not stolen" -- to which Paul
responded by saying "The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur. We never had
any presentation in court where we ever looked at the evidence..."
Paul continued: "There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of
State and not the state legislature. To me those are clearly unconstitutional and I think
there's still a chance those do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court."
"No election is perfect," Stephanopoulos shot back , telling Paul there were "86 challenges
filed by President Trump, all were dismissed". As Paul tries to argue that many cases were
dismissed for lack of standing and not due to examination of evidence, Stephanopoulos responds:
" Can't you just say the words 'this election wasn't stolen'? "
'75% of Republicans want to look at election integrity,' Paul responds. Stephanopoulos
responds by saying that those 75% agree with him because they were "fed a big lie" from the
President.
Paul pushed back, telling Stephanopoulos: "You immediately say everything's a lie instead of
saying there's two sides to everything. Historically what would happen is if I said I thought
there was fraud, you'd interview someone else who said there wasn't. But now you insert
yourself in the middle and say that the absolute fact is that everything I'm saying is a
lie."
"You're saying there's no fraud and it's all been investigated and that's just not true,"
Paul continues, with Stephanopoulos arguing at the same time. Paul then goes into specifics,
detailing irregularities in states in like Wisconsin. "I plan on spending the next two years
going around, state to state, fixing these problems," Paul continues. "Let's have an open
debate. It's a free country!"
"There has been no thorough examination of all states to see what problems we had and see if
we could fix them," Paul says, responding to Stephanopoulos' claims that Bill Barr pronounced
there was "no widespread election fraud".
"There's two sides to every story," Paul says. "Interview someone on the other side, but
don't insert yourself into the story to say we're all liars."
"You're forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there's only one side," Paul
says. "A journalist would hear both sides and there are two sides to this story."
Election integrity aside, Paul has been a vocal critic of the Biden administration in recent
days . On Saturday,
we noted Paul's interview with Fox host Sean
Hannity, where he pummeled the Biden administration's decision to push for a $15 minimum wage
increase that could put 4 million people out of work - leading the Kentucky Republican to
exclaim:
"'Why does Joe Biden hate Black teenagers?' ... Why does Joe Biden want to destroy all of
these jobs?"
Paul comments come amid ramblings from various leftist economists who insist that there's no
impact on employment from such a drastic minimum wage hike...
...common sense (and historical experience) for anyone who has ever run an actual business
is that raising costs on the lowest-skilled workers in your organization will ripple all the
way up, forcing either higher prices to the end-user (eradicating the 'living wage'
improvement) and or forcing layoffs as management hold margins and reduce costs (the
least-skilled first).
Historically speaking, the black unemployment rate is twice that of whites , while minimum
wage increases - as we've shown repeatedly over the last week - correlate with spikes in job
losses just about every single time.
That's not an "alternative" fact, that's the awkward reality of 'unintended consequences'
from nanny-state intervention write large for the last 70 years.
Paul also blasted Biden for
canceling the Keystone XL oil pipeline:
"It's kind of a strange beginning to an administration," Paul said. "You're going to put your best foot forward and the first thing you say is, 'This is how
I'm going to kill jobs' ... 'I'm going to kill thousands of jobs of the Keystone pipeline
with ending it.'"
Explanation : There are multiple ways to commit election fraud using Dominion systems but
the most efficient manner is the full spectrum two-step process.
First at the adjudication step -- effectively covered in the data scientists' presentation
on Georgia video -- massive ballot flipping and with the previous ballot images deleted, no
trail remains.
Secondly at the tabulator stage (GEMS software, covered in detail in the Fractional Magic
video) ----- so ballots which were not adjudicated, and in some counties 90% went to the
adjudication process, proceeded to the tabulation step where they could be
fractionalized.
Boing_Snap 20 minutes ago
You gotta ask the question of Rand here though, even as a lone voice of reason that Rand
Paul is he and the Trump supporting Senators failed the Republic. They needed to push forward
and introduce the Election Fraud evidence after the Jan. 6 planned interruption of the
evidence hearing. Why didn't the Election fraud evidence get its day in front of Congress? The Fraud needed to be part of the historical record, and it was not.
nmewn 2 hours ago (Edited)
George Stephanopoulos: "There was not enough fraud to..."
Oh. So thats how the Leftardian brain works! Thank you Georgie boi. You now admit to voter fraud whereby legitimate votes were cancelled out by the fraud but
it is your opinion that there was not enough fraud for it to matter. Never again do I want to hear this little runt of the litter yapping "Every vote
matters!"
Feck Weed 2 hours ago
That's the fallback, the "widespread" qualifier.
Cheapie 1 hour ago
Yes, "Mostly honest election."
dark_matter 15 minutes ago
Just like mostly peaceful protestors as the buildings burn.
Zero-Hegemon 2 hours ago
Yes, "just enough" fraud to cover for Traitor Joe, but NOT ENOUGH to warrant a look into
the allegations. You got his number.
Samual Vimes 2 hours ago
South Philly judge of elections admits he took bribes to stuff the ballot box for
Democratic candidates
Public schools have zero tolerance for 'bullying' (that definition has been broadened to
irrelevance) or acting out for grade schools kids who barely have the ability to control
themselves... but SOME election fraud is ok. Shining examples of values-driven integrity.
FluTangClan 2 hours ago
Stephanopoulos is Bill Clinton's lapdog. He's not a journalist. He's a democratic party
operative and always has been. He's a warmonger dwarf. He was there for banging interns with cigars. He was there for Vince
Foster...
I would say Rand Paul is one of the few Republicans who is not corrupted. He's not perfect
either, but he seems to be one of a handful who tries to do something he promised to his
voters. As you point out, the problem isn't that there are a few RINOs. The problem is that
there are only a few decent human beings in the Republic leadership who are not entirely in
the pocket of the RNC, which is entirely in the pocket of the globalists.
Wards 1 and 2, all districts, 'normal' results with Trump around 5-15% (he officially won
12% of the black vote and 18% of the black male vote nationwide).
Ward 3 district 1.....and the next few hundred districts in Wards 3, 4, 5, etc.....98%+
D.
Stolen votes. Mostly black men's votes.
Then do Detroit. Same thing, a 'buffer page' or two of normal looking results and then bam
98+% D.
Simple corruption, simple cheating.
NOW we can talk about the chain of custody of the mail-in 'thingies' and the security of
the electronic systems.....but only if you can admit the bald truth in the DNC machine
cities.
The MSM has given up the pretense of being journalists. They are full-fledged propagandist attack dogs and proud of it.
Handful of Dust 2 hours ago (Edited)
One problem Georgie and his Demorat pals have, is the 100 million people who listened to
the State Legislative hearings with Rudy where hundreds of witnesses came forward with
credible evidence of fraud. Then there are the video segments of evidence of fraud. Then you have a dozen of the world's top forensic data people coming from all over
including forensic teams from Wall Street who testified "there is zero probability Biden
could have gotten those numbers."
Inconvenient facts that provide overwhelming proof of fraud. That's why Dems are still in
a tizzy and have 50,000 soldiers and police protecting His Majesty Biden...but this is not
going away from what Rand Paul says.
"Da peeples love me so much I need 15 platoons of soldiers for protection," Pol Pot yelled
to the rabble below his bullet-proof, bomb-proof balcony.
Rattling Bones 2 hours ago
How come Stephanopoulos can't say the words 'there was no Russian collusion'?
Demologos 2 hours ago
He enjoys his nice fat paycheck for looking the other way.
That Old Magic 2 hours ago
It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not
understanding it ." ― Upton Sinclair
philmannwright 2 hours ago
George is not a journalist puhlease everyone knows that. He is the el chapito of the dem
media
FluTangClan 2 hours ago
Thank you. He was on Bill Clinton's staff. He was a happy part of bombing Iraqi babies,
bombing Yugoslavia, bombing phkn Sudan based on internet searches. He has zero credibility.
His credibility is buried with Vince Foster.
adr 2 hours ago (Edited)
They can never allow the evidence to be presented because it is overwhelming proof of
fraud. If there was no fraud, then there would be no harm in having evidence presented in
court. The absolute proof of fraud is the number of adjudicated ballots. Were 68% of people in
Georgia really incompetent enough to not know how to fill out a ballot.
The other irrefutable fact is that the state of PA did not follow an order from the US
supreme court to separate ballots received after election day. Also in Philadelphia election
officials destroyed the envelopes so they could not be matched with ballots.
Even if Biden really did win those two states, which he didn't, the actions of the
election supervisors invalidated the election. The only recourse was to have a new election
in disputed states.
headless blogger 1 hour ago (Edited)
Plus, Paul is not the best person to make the case for the American people on election
integrity, as he isn't even an attorney. He can't debate the issue properly which allows the
Psy-ops operators like Steph to out maneuver him.
People need FACTS, which so far the election integrity researchers are not providing in a
logical and chronological format. The PSY OPS operation that pulled off the Coup, are smooth
operators and are now able to clean up any loose ends with their media.
What needs to happen is an independent investigation that can present the findings in a
way that people understand. As it is, they keep screaming election fraud, but aren't providing details in an orderly
manner so nobody can really get a grip on what happened.....
....which is the hallmark of a psy-ops operation; they don't want you to be able to
process what happened logically and chronologically.
yerfej 43 minutes ago
No, they have implemented a very good long term strategy to take over the positions of
power. Academia is a good example where they own it and now have the ability to pollute minds
rather than get students to look at all sides of the equation. That doesn't do anyone outside
of the elites any good. Reality is its not a left vs. right thing, its the common people vs.
the elites.
rkb100100 2 hours ago
"No election is perfect" - that'll be carved on the countries tombstone.
Lost in translation 1 hour ago
Blows my mind that people forget so quickly how he turned - or just overlook it - and
continue in the foolish belief "Rand is one of the good guys!"
People reveal themselves in a crisis. Rand certainly did...
TruthAbsolute 1 hour ago
of course there was election fraud...and the democrats have set up a system that protects
them well. All the way up to the judicial system and if not their judge then families are
threaten. There is is no integrity in politics, these people are not honest or very, very few
of them! They are not working for the people but ultimately for themselves and their life
treasure chess! USA has become very Evil minded!
Jam 1 hour ago remove link
Nice to see Paul not backing down, someone in politics still has a backbone and can tell
it like it is besides Trump.
'The Day the Music Died'*
A brief history of the decline and fall of the United States of America
- November 22, 1963 The Anglo-American Ruling Elite, through their Deep State operatives,
overthrow the U.S. government. From now on all presidents will rule under Deep State
supervision.
- January 20, 1981
The Anglo-American Ruling Elite's first puppet president is installed. Others will follow
(Clinton, W, Obama).
Over the next 40 years the U.S. economy will be hollowed out while the The Anglo-American
Ruling Elite strip mines the country's assets, leaving both the government and the population
in perpetual debt servitude.
- November 9, 1989
The Soviet Union gives up on the Cold War
The Anglo-American Ruling Elite is now free to rebuild the former British Empire as a new,
improved Global Empire, based in global institutions and without the inconvenience of host
countries.
The Anglo-American Ruling Elite now becomes the 'Global Elite'.
- September 11, 2001
Domestic resistance to the U.S. military becoming the Global Elite's mercenary military force
is removed.
The colonial wars may begin.
- November 3, 2020
After decades of suffering a thousand cuts, U.S. democracy is delivered the final, fatal
blow.
- January 6, 2021 - The Day the Music Died
The U.S. Capitol is under military occupation. The constitution is effectively suspended.
The United States of America, as a constitutional republic, is no more.
From now on the U.S. is just another Globalist colony.
* From Don McLean's 1971 song 'American Pie'. At the time it seemed an omen of things to
come. It took 50 years for the premonition to be realized.
After the Coup in Ukraine in 2014 for several years I listened weekly to the John
Batchelor show when he interviewed Russia scholar the late Stephen Cohen.
From those conversations I learned that Ukraine is politically divided EAST (pro European
Union) / WEST (pro Russian) (a bit like the United States is divided RED / BLUE).
Politically by vote Ukraine was close to 50% pro E.U., 50% pro Russia.
After the Coup Crimea voted to return to Russia thus making the political breakdown of
Ukraine more pro E.U.
Forbes Magazine in 2008 republished an interview with Soviet critic Alexander
Solzhenitsyn
Solzhenitsyn, among other things, noted 1) in 1919 Lenin in bringing Ukraine into the
Soviet Union gave Ukraine "several Russian provinces to assuage her feelings," 2) that when
in 1954 Khrushchev gave Crimea to Ukraine Sevastopol was not transferred to Ukraine as
Sevastopol was a military city subject to the Central Government of the U.S.S.R.
I would note that Khrushchev's transfer of Crimea to Ukraine violated Soviet Law /
Constitution as the people of Crimea were not asked if they wanted to be transferred.
At the time I did some searching about the history of Crimea and Ukraine and it turns out
that shortly after the fall of the Soviet Union Crimea wanted to separate from Ukraine and
the Central Government of Ukraine threatened to invade Crimea.
The Central Government of Ukraine in its Constitution gave Crimea a special status not
given other provinces.
I would note that in October 1962 Joe Biden was 19 years 11 months old and likely a
college student. In October 1962 the world came close to ending (at least a good deal of the
so called civilized world) with the Cuban Missile Crisis.
However, in 2014, ignoring the warning of Robert F. Kennedy of the need to put yourself in
the other Country's shoes, Biden supported the violent Coup which essentially included a
violent takeover of the Ukrainian Parliament (Rada) by violent protesters, much akin to the
Trump Taliban taking over the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.
It seems that Biden thought that NATO could just move into Sevastopol and take over not
just the port of the Russian navy, but the Russian Navy itself.
"... "Invasion of Capitol" was real, but it does not seem a conspiracy with hidden strings. We know how mobs were use to overthrow government, e.g. in Cairo, Kiev and La Paz -- in chronological order. It was nothing like that. ..."
"... Where there is a wide room for possible conspiracy is how it happened. Methods of defending key buildings in such situations exists and were used, with success, many times, including Washington Mall. And they were not deployed. Why? ..."
"... Defenders of the Capitol were practically removed and Democrats got the possibility of starting the political season of 2021 with impeachment and other jolly diversions, complete with the revival of Russia Gate. ..."
These Keystone Cops would be hilarious if they weren't so nefarious. There was no
"insurrection" – totally manufactured, false flag.
Where were the "insurgents" that were supposedly going to show up Jan-20-21 at every state
capital in the nation and DC? The handful of demonstrators that did show up were anything but
insurgents, and instead some of them talked about populist unity.
Yet for days ever since "the assault on democracy" that's all the mainstream harped about,
with help from notables on "the left" crying wolf over "the rise of fascism." What a joke.
CIA can't even carry out a false flag in its front yard anymore, much less in its
backyard.
Next comes commissions and the legislation and the policy changes to avert the evil.
Meanwhile 4000+ US citizens die per day due to a pandemic that could've, should've been
contained by a half-way decent public health system like the rest of the world has.
The Biden Administration desperately needed an excuse NOT to work on progressive causes
(caged children, M4A, student debt, etc) and they got it: an anti domestic terrorism
bill.
JohnO , January 22, 2021 at 19:50
Sorry, Mrs de Legorreta,
Your comments are completely off point and totally lacking evidence. To suggest that the
violent invasion and trashing of the Capitol was a CIA false-flag operation ignores the facts
on the ground. The leader of The Proud Boys, a neo-nazi group was videotaped at the attack.
He has admitted to planning it. Many of his confederates are in fact fascist. Many of them
hold as their greatest aspiration a race war. The subject of this column was Russiagate, and
you have taken it as an opportunity to promote an interpretation of the January 6 uprising
that has no basis in fact. Well done.
Piotr Berman , January 23, 2021 at 12:06
"Invasion of Capitol" was real, but it does not seem a conspiracy with hidden strings.
We know how mobs were use to overthrow government, e.g. in Cairo, Kiev and La Paz -- in
chronological order. It was nothing like that.
Where there is a wide room for possible conspiracy is how it happened. Methods of
defending key buildings in such situations exists and were used, with success, many times,
including Washington Mall. And they were not deployed. Why?
One possibility is "offside strategy" of Association Football: you remove the defenders
from the area in front of the goal, and then the offense of the opposite side makes a
forbidden move that is otherwise OK. Defenders of the Capitol were practically removed
and Democrats got the possibility of starting the political season of 2021 with impeachment
and other jolly diversions, complete with the revival of Russia Gate.
I am agnostic about the causes, but the situation was highly peculiar.
· The US national security state failed to prevent the pro-Trump mob
attack on the Capitol. Yet instead of accountability, US intelligence officials are being
emboldened via increased militarization, censorship, and surveillance. Max Blumenthal and Aaron
Maté discuss the dangerous fallout.
Rather than prioritize accountability for US intelligence officials' failure to prevent the
pro-Trump mob attack on the Capitol, the incident is instead being used to expand the national
security state's powers. Max Blumenthal, who witnessed the Capitol mob and reported on a key
participant, discusses his coverage of the attack and the dangers of a militarized, myopic
response.
Guest: Max Blumenthal, editor of The Grayzone and author of several books including his
latest, "The Management of Savagery."
Aaron Maté is a journalist and producer. He hosts Pushback with Aaron
Maté on The Grayzone. He is also is contributor to The Nation magazine and former
host/producer for The Real News and Democracy Now!. Aaron has also presented and produced for
Vice, AJ+, and Al Jazeera.
"... "You have such a fervent, passionate, evangelical faith in this country why in the name of God don't you have any faith in the system of government you're so hell-bent to protect? You want to defend the United States of America, then defend it with the tools it supplies you with -- its Constitution. You ask for a mandate, General, from a ballot box. You don't steal it after midnight, when the country has its back turned." -- Seven Days in May (1964) ..."
"... That January 6 attempt by so-called insurrectionists to overturn the election results was not the real coup, however. Those who answered President Trump's call to march on the Capitol were merely the fall guys, manipulated into creating the perfect crisis for the Deep State -- a.k.a. the Police State a.k.a. the Military Industrial Complex a.k.a. the Techno-Corporate State a.k.a. the Surveillance State -- to swoop in and take control. ..."
"... It took no time at all for the switch to be thrown and the nation's capital to be placed under a military lockdown, online speech forums restricted, and individuals with subversive or controversial viewpoints ferreted out, investigated, shamed and/or shunned . ..."
"... Friendly Fascism: The New Face of Power in America ..."
"... Seven Days in May ..."
"... Seven Days in May ..."
"... domestic right-wing extremism ..."
"... Battlefield America: The War on the American People ..."
"... This article was originally published on The Rutherford Institute . ..."
"You have such a fervent, passionate, evangelical faith in this country why in the name
of God don't you have any faith in the system of government you're so hell-bent to protect? You
want to defend the United States of America, then defend it with the tools it supplies you with
-- its Constitution. You ask for a mandate, General, from a ballot box. You don't steal it
after midnight, when the country has its back turned." -- Seven Days in May
(1964)
No doubt about it: the coup d'etat was successful.
That January 6
attempt by so-called insurrectionists to overturn the election results was not the real
coup, however. Those who answered
President Trump's call to march on the Capitol were merely the fall guys, manipulated into
creating the perfect crisis for the Deep State -- a.k.a. the Police State a.k.a. the Military
Industrial Complex a.k.a. the Techno-Corporate State a.k.a. the Surveillance State -- to swoop
in and take control.
It took no time at all for the switch to be thrown and the nation's capital to be placed
under a military lockdown, online speech forums restricted, and individuals with subversive or
controversial viewpoints
ferreted out, investigated, shamed and/or shunned .
This new order didn't emerge into being this week, or this month, or even this year,
however.
Indeed, the real coup happened when our government "of the people, by the people, for the
people" was overthrown by a profit-driven, militaristic, techno-corporate state that is in
cahoots with a government "of the rich, by the elite, for the corporations."
We've been mired in this swamp for decades now.
Every successive president starting with Franklin D. Roosevelt has been bought lock, stock
and barrel and made to dance to the Deep State's tune.
Writing in 1980, Gross predicted a future in which he saw:
a new despotism creeping slowly across America. Faceless oligarchs sit at command posts of
a corporate-government complex that has been slowly evolving over many decades. In efforts to
enlarge their own powers and privileges, they are willing to have others suffer the intended
or unintended consequences of their institutional or personal greed. For Americans, these
consequences include chronic inflation, recurring recession, open and hidden unemployment,
the poisoning of air, water, soil and bodies, and, more important, the subversion of our
constitution. More broadly, consequences include widespread
intervention in international politics through economic manipulation, covert action, or
military invasion
This stealthy, creeping, silent coup that Gross prophesied is the same danger that writer
Rod Serling envisioned in the 1964 political thriller Seven Days in May ,
a clear warning to beware of martial law packaged as a well-meaning and overriding concern for
the nation's security.
Incredibly enough, almost 60 years later, we find ourselves hostages to a government run
more by military doctrine and corporate greed than by the rule of law established in the
Constitution. Indeed, proving once again that fact and fiction are not dissimilar, today's
current events could well have been lifted straight out of Seven Days in May , which
takes viewers into eerily familiar terrain.
With the Cold War at its height, an unpopular U.S. President signs a momentous nuclear
disarmament treaty with the Soviet Union. Believing that the treaty constitutes an unacceptable
threat to the security of the United States and certain that he knows what is best for the
nation, General James Mattoon Scott (played by Burt Lancaster), the head of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and presidential hopeful, plans a military takeover of the national government. When Gen.
Scott's aide, Col. Casey (Kirk Douglas), discovers the planned military coup, he goes to the
President with the information. The race for command of the U.S. government begins, with the
clock ticking off the hours until the military plotters plan to overthrow the President.
Needless to say, while on the big screen, the military coup is foiled and the republic is
saved in a matter of hours, in the real world, the plot thickens and spreads out over the past
half century.
We've been losing our freedoms so incrementally for so long -- sold to us in the name of
national security and global peace, maintained by way of martial law disguised as law and
order, and enforced by a standing army of militarized police and a political elite determined
to maintain their powers at all costs -- that it's hard to pinpoint exactly when it all started
going downhill, but we've been on that fast-moving, downward trajectory for some time now.
The question is no longer whether the U.S. government will be preyed upon and taken over by
the military industrial complex. That's a done deal, but martial law disguised as national
security is only one small part of the greater deception we've been fooled into believing is
for our own good.
How do you get a nation to docilely accept a police state? How do you persuade a populace to
accept metal detectors and pat downs in their schools, bag searches in their train stations,
tanks and military weaponry used by their small town police forces, surveillance cameras in
their traffic lights, police strip searches on their public roads, unwarranted blood draws at
drunk driving checkpoints, whole body scanners in their airports, and government agents
monitoring their communications?
Try to ram such a state of affairs down the throats of the populace, and you might find
yourself with a rebellion on your hands. Instead, you bombard them with constant color-coded
alerts, terrorize them with shootings and bomb threats in malls, schools, and sports arenas,
desensitize them with a steady diet of police violence, and sell the whole package to them as
being for their best interests.
This is not the language of a free people. This is the language of force.
Still, you can't say we weren't warned.
Back in 2008, an Army
War College report revealed that "widespread civil violence inside the United States would
force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic
order and human security." The 44-page report went on to warn that potential causes for such
civil unrest could include another terrorist attack, "unforeseen economic collapse, loss of
functioning political and legal order , purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency,
pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters."
In 2009, reports by the Department of Homeland Security surfaced that labelled right-wing
and left-wing activists and military veterans as extremists (a.k.a. terrorists) and called
on the government to subject such targeted individuals to full-fledged pre-crime surveillance.
Almost a decade later, after spending billions to fight terrorism, the DHS concluded that the
greater threat is not ISIS but domestic right-wing extremism .
Meanwhile, the police have been transformed into extensions of the military while the nation
itself has been transformed into a battlefield. This is what a state of undeclared martial law
looks like, when you can be arrested, tasered, shot, brutalized and in some cases killed merely
for not complying with a government agent's order or not complying fast enough. This hasn't
just been happening in crime-ridden inner cities. It's been happening all across the
country.
Rounding out this profit-driven campaign to turn American citizens into enemy combatants
(and America into a battlefield) is a technology sector that has been colluding with the
government to create a Big Brother that is all-knowing, all-seeing
and inescapable . It's not just the drones,
fusion centers , license plate readers, stingray devices and the NSA that you have to worry
about. You're also being tracked by the black boxes in your
cars , your cell phone, smart devices in your home, grocery loyalty cards, social media
accounts, credit cards, streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon, and e-book reader
accounts.
So you see, January 6 and its aftermath provided the government and its corporate
technocrats the perfect excuse to show off all of the powers they've been amassing so
assiduously over the years.
Mind you, by "government," I'm not referring to the highly partisan, two-party bureaucracy
of the Republicans and Democrats.
I'm referring to "government" with a capital "G," the entrenched Deep State that is
unaffected by elections, unaltered by populist movements, and has set itself beyond the reach
of the law.
I'm referring to the corporatized, militarized, entrenched bureaucracy that is fully
operational and staffed by unelected officials who are, in essence, running the country and
calling the shots in Washington DC, no matter who sits in the White House.
This is the hidden face of a government that has no respect for the freedom of its
citizenry.
Brace yourself.
There is something being concocted in the dens of power, far beyond the public eye, and it
doesn't bode well for the future of this country.
Anytime you have an entire nation so mesmerized by the antics of the political ruling class
that they are oblivious to all else, you'd better beware.
Anytime you have a government that operates in the shadows, speaks in a language of force,
and rules by fiat, you'd better beware.
And anytime you have a government so far removed from its people as to ensure that they are
never seen, heard or heeded by those elected to represent them, you'd better beware.
All of those dastardly seeds we have allowed the government to sow under the guise of
national security are bearing demon fruit.
The gravest threat facing us as a nation is not extremism but despotism, exercised by a
ruling class whose only allegiance is to power and money.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your
email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
The January Sixth events in Washington D.C., depicted in the corporate media as Donald
Trump's criminal "incitement to insurrection", were predictably greeted by Democrats and their
media as the worst tragedy to ever befall American democracy, the heinous plot to establish a
police state -- a coup d'etat, the final desperate act of a deranged tyrant. That might be
considered something akin to surface discourse. Framed differently, those events could not have
made the Dems happier, for by the time the last demonstrator left the Capitol the political
floodgates were opened: total war against an entire nation of seditious Republicans, now
demonized as "domestic terrorists", could finally be adopted as full-fledged strategy. The
perfect Dems scenario for gaining unchallenged power had been laid.
Beyond the moment of Capitol disorder the Dems would find, without much difficulty, that
most precious of all gifts -- a political godsend. Like Pearl Harbor and 9/11, national trauma
would give the power elite just what it coveted – in this case the greatest of all
opportunities to frame Trump and much of the Republican party as enemies of the state,
collectively damned to ideological purgatory. January Sixth, like December Seventh before it,
would serve as political code for converting national chaos into its very opposite: relief. The
Dems, already beginning to solidify power in the White House, Congress, the media, and Big
Tech, could now move toward a scorched-earth policy – war of annihilation.
In his book Cultures of Militarism, historian John Dower describes the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor as "political godsend", a moment when humiliating military defeat ("day
of infamy") would allow president Franklin Roosevelt to do what he desperately wanted to do but
could not in the face of an "isolationist" American public opinion -- bring the U.S. into World
War II. Pearl Harbor turned out to be a wonderful blessing in disguise for FDR, whose infamous
eight-point program effectively provoked the Japanese into attacking the Pacific fleet in
Hawaii. In the end, after four difficult years, victory would be heroically wrestled from
defeat.
After what was portrayed as a "sneak attack" (military operations were supposed to be
advertised in advance?), the New York Herald Tribune could exalt: "Since the clash now
appears to have been inevitable, its occurrence brings with it a sense of relief. The air is
clearer. Americans can now get down to their task [of waging war] with the old obstacles
finally removed, forgotten." Public opposition to U.S. entry into the war vanished in two hours
one early Sunday morning. Democratic politicians, joined by a good many Republicans, were now
ready to take military combat to Japan (and then Germany), as the attack had given FDR all the
power, not to mention legitimacy, any president could possibly desire. Since 1941 Pearl Harbor
has been ideological code for unlimited executive freedom, and Roosevelt energetically took
advantage.
In the aftermath of Pearl Harbor, shock turned to resolve, momentary defeat to righteous
commitment. Victim status would be transformed into its opposite. Roughly the same dynamic
would be repeated in the case of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, which gave president George W.
Bush "permission" to do what he and the neocons were already hellbent on doing – invading
Iraq and "finishing the job" of overthrowing Saddam Hussein. In both cases – Pearl Harbor
and 9/11 – national humiliation was mobilized to "reset" U.S. foreign policy.
For the present-day ensemble of Democratic elites – Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Nancy
Pelosi, et. al. – January Sixth at the Capitol could not have been more timely, more
opportune. Truly another godsend. A jolt to the system, however feeble, partial, and ill-fated,
would justify sustained authoritarian force across the public landscape. Seen as vile agents of
treachery, Republicans would be thrown onto the defensive, immobilized. Pelosi, ready as ever
for vengeful action, would say: "The situation of this unhinged president could not be more
dangerous. He chose to be an insurrectionist." Trump's behavior (in riling up demonstrators)
would demand immediate and harsh retribution. Other Dems quickly followed Pelosi's lead,
amplified by a monolithically frenzied media. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, shrill as ever and
clearly speaking for the "progressive" squad, said: "I do believe we should exercise every
avenue possible because the president has shown that his mental status and his actions are
wildly eroding at a rapid pace." Trump represents a "clear and present danger to our
democracy", she blustered, and must be removed from office as soon as possible.
Not to be overshadowed, Senator Chuck Schumer, reprising "Pearl Harbor" no less, would
state: "I have never lived through or even imagined an experience like the one we have just
witnessed in this Capitol. President Franklin Roosevelt set aside December 7, 1941 as a day
that will live in infamy. Unfortunately, we can now add January 6, 2021 to that very short list
of dates in American history that will live forever in infamy." Oblivious to months of fire
bombings, lootings, beatings, and killings across the streets and buildings of dozens of
American cities (criminality that persists to this day) – all encouraged by the Dems --
Schumer would add, hypocritically: "The temple of democracy was desecrated, its windows
smashed, our offices vandalized."
The authoritarian, virtually fascistic reaction of the media and political establishment was
swift and, well, unhinged: the House would quickly move to impeach the president, again, Trump
was permanently banned from Twitter and other social-media outlets, Republicans (even those far
removed from the Capitol violence) were facing censorship, blacklisting, job loss, and
thoroughly dishonest smears. Within a week the silencing of conservatives across the Internet
had reached new heights. The long-cherished Beltway goal to destroy Trump, his family, and
associates was in sight: any Trump hope for the presidency in 2024 would be smashed. Hysterical
threats of "domestic terrorism" would mean, as always, a drastic Hobbesian response: maximum
state power, strengthened ideological controls, the crushing of political opposition.
As Dower noted, the ideological code emanating from "Pearl Harbor" included yet another
motif: the familiar stereotype of Asians (at that time) as sneaky, backstabbing, and irrational
would be affirmed on December Seventh. Who else could carry out such a dastardly attack? The
same code would naturally apply to millions (tens of millions) of deplorable Trump supporters
– a motley assemblage of gun-toting racists and neo-Nazis. Didn't those sanctimonious CNN
pundits always warn about the backward white-supremacists seduced by the guile of the Orange
Menace? Indeed. The truth was finally illuminated for every Beltway dweller to seize upon and
embellish: Trump followers would now have to pay, their collective guilt revealed beyond doubt
amidst the ashes of January Sixth.
So when all the enlightened Dems repeat their heartfelt sadness over the fate of the
Republic, over Trump's evil subversion of "our democracy", it might be time to look more
closely beneath the surface – or maybe head for the hills. If there were any bars open in
the woke Democratic neighborhoods, that is probably where Pelosi, AOC, Adam Schiff, and other
sad victims of the Orange Menace might be found gathering to celebrate, toasting to their
unbelievably good fortune. Whether such celebrations might be long-lived, however, would be
another matter. Fascistic politics has a tendency to devour its own ruthless protagonists.
Thank you for writing this. I am still trying to figure out why Ashli Babbit, the only
person shot on 1/6, was surrounded by cops at the time, with John Sullivan filming the
incident, along with a Chinese videographer from the CIA's Epoch Times. Sullivan's footage of
the event focuses lovingly on the hand of the shooter, until he steps forward and shoots. The
shooter makes a very exaggerated movement before he fires, despite having his gun trained on
Babbitt already. I believe this movement was a necessary signal to Babbitt, so that could
fall backward in sync with the gunshot. She could have been easily restrained and arrested by
the cops on her side of the window, but instead she was "shot" by a conveniently disembodied
arm. And the only evidence of injury is a very small amount of blood coming out of her
mouth.
@Sue Dunham ng
out of her neck and all over the Capital steps.
After I saw the video of Ashli Babbit's rant on gewtube I came to the conclusion it was
just another manufactured event. I was reminded of the woman Astronaut that drove all the way
from the Johnson Space Center down to the Space Coast in Florida to be with her unrequited
love. All the while wearing diapers the whole time so she wouldn't have to take potty breaks
on the drive down.
If anyone else has seen a video of blood spurting out of Ashli's neck and pooling all over
the floor please provide a link.
You know, I want to see a video where the blood is really spurting out like in the
movies.
1/6 was a nothingburger that is being jewed out of all proportion.
In reality, 1/6 did about ..1/10000000000000 as much damage as the Antifa and BLM
shitheads did in nine months of REAL insurrection.
The jewish owned MSM lies about everything, turns ANY event into an opportunity to SHIT on
innocent white people to demonize them and instill desire in non-whites to MURDER white
people.
The jew media narrative distilled is blood libel against white people.
In his book Cultures of Militarism, historian John Dower describes the Japanese attack
on Pearl Harbor as "political godsend", a moment when humiliating military defeat ("day of
infamy") would allow president Franklin Roosevelt to do what he desperately wanted to do
but could not in the face of an "isolationist" American public opinion -- bring the U.S.
into World War II. Pearl Harbor turned out to be a wonderful blessing in disguise for FDR,
whose infamous eight-point program effectively provoked the Japanese into attacking the
Pacific fleet in Hawaii.
Roosevelt also knew a Japanese fleet was enroute to attack Pearl Harbor, but withheld this
intel from commanders in Hawaii.
@Beavertales act,
the draconian over-reaction of the elite may prove to be a godsend rallying event for the
oppressed.
Indeed, when I read the title, "January Sixth as Godsend," I thought this article was going
in the direction you indicate.
Events, like arguments, often comprise two, opposing poles. The question is, what will be
the result, the aufheben , this time?
In the near term, clearly it will be further erosion of civil liberties and continued
"American Pravada" fakery. In the long run, however, anything is possible, even things we can't
imagine, because this is now an irrational, complex, disturbed system.
Who will play the role of the Philip Zelikow in the "Insurrection Commission," in the
extension of the 9/11 Commission into the forthcoming 1/6 Commission?
https://www.youtube.com/embed/RFpw-ioM3dk?feature=oembed 44:00
" a shift of the tectonic plates. It is happening before our eyes, this gathering of the elites
."
I forget the name of the incident, but several years ago there was a very obvious fake
female getting shot incident in an attempted color revolution in Iran. It had cia/mi6/Mossad
written all over it, as usual. However, I think they ended up killing the "useful idiot" a few
hours later when the plan failed. This incident is very similar. If someone knows the incident
I am talking about please remind me/us.
Please don't besmirch fascists by mentioning Pelosi as a representative. A better
description of her would be a plutocratic cypriot. No self respecting fascist would be caught
within a stone's throw of her for fear of catching the backdoor trots.
Quite tame, but Schumer, Pelosi and the rest of the gang are going to work it up into The
Reichstag Fire and would, if they could use it to get an enabling act.
Goebbels would be so proud of all the Dems, especially of Schumer.
We can take this Pearl Harbor analogy a little further. The Japanese Americans were also
stripped of their property in a very planned and devious manner immediately after December 7.
Jews picked up most of this property at fire sale prices and benefitted immensely.
The full effects of how this faked January 6 "insurrection" was "good for the jews" will
become clear in the months ahead. But one thing is clear, the take down of Parler directly
benefitted jew owned Facebook (((Zuckerberg))) and the gaggle of jew controlled social media
outfits like Twitter and Instagram.
The Japanese Americans were stripped of thousands of acres of valuable farmland in central
California. Shortly after the January 6 insurrection it came out the Bill Gates is the largest
owner of farmland in the US. Covid and Climate Engineering has impacted farmers across the US
(derechios). I think there may be some correlation here too.
There is also the issue of the 25,000 National Gaurd called in for the innauguration.
Washington mobilized for war.
They can wear tailored suits that cost five or ten thousand. They can get hair colouring
that cost maybe two grand. They can spend as much as they can spend, but the brutal truth is
they are not getting out of this place alive, no matter how much they spend, no matter how much
political power they have, no matter who they know. They are going to be just as dead as the
rest of us. LOL.
The people pictured above, are hands down, the craziest of the crazies. These comrades make
the Trump administration look like boy scouts by comparison.
The problem is, they weren't carrying guns. No one was really threatened. They stayed
between the purple ropes, those folks with canes and walkers and only a few reached the "inner
sanctum", which looks like a library and there ANTIFA members instigated the usual window
breaking and were actually scolded by some of the Trump supporters telling them to stop it,
when finally an unarmed woman, a Trump supporter was murdered by the police. Only the biggest
dupes and people wanting to believe an absurd narrative were shocked. Thinking people were
not.
Interesting that the troops in DC are STAYING, their active duty orders extending AT LEAST
through 16 February which MAY BE EXTENDED military document below on this
Some say these are Trump troops who will still help 'stop the steal', arrest Biden etc LOL
others say that Biden-Harris are preparing martial law scenarios after possible false flag
terror attack, or some kind of new economic or pandemic crisis Given Biden's USA troops invaded
northern Syria on Biden's first full day in office Thursday, it seems the USA war machine is
back in gear and happy to be ridin' wit' Biden
As is widely noted, the new Biden gov seems to be poking ordinary Americans with a
stick:
– Biden's tranny orders destroying women's sports and that all bio-males 'identifying as
female' be welcome in women's locker rooms & rest rooms
– Biden 'critical race theory' order for white-humiliating 'training', all non-Jew whites
to confess to being inherently 'racist' as price to keep gov etc jobs
– Amnesty & citizenship for 11 million & maybe 30-40 million migrants inside US,
end to deportations & border security
Great summary, though the word 'godsent' implies a passivity which seems misapplied in
describing the actions of the beneficiaries of this deep state instigation.
This type of event, perfunctorily (and rather clumsily) tracing a number of transparent
stages, which are then blasted incessantly through propaganda megaphones, is absolutely
standard practice in all foreign coups.
This dynamic is used to give all the partisans a fig leaf to cover their actions and to
provide the next level actors a cue to start their intervention.
"You know, I want to see a video where the blood is really spurting out like in the
movies."
Fair enough.
But -- if she died instantly there'd be very little blood .
I have no idea what really happened, but I'm willing to provisionally accept she was shot dead
by an unidentified shooter.
"The temple of democracy was desecrated, its windows smashed, our offices vandalized."
Most of the Dem' – Establishment reaction to 6.1.21 has been spew inducing, but the above
quote is just perfectly -- funny.
It is SO over the top, SO cynical, self serving & lacking in irony that hilarity is the
only natural response.
There are said to be 2300 Capitol police answerable to Pelosi etc. So when the remarkably
few police actually there conveniently moved the barriers aside to let protestors into the
building, its obvious that the Democrat gerontocracy was still thinking well ahead of the dumb
Trumpstein rabble.
@Sue Dunham staged
"incidents" along the path to Lexington, just like Charlottsville in 2017 was part of the lead
up to the "insurrection" of January 6, 2021.
Samuel Adams and his Masonic Brothers had been planning and inciting the rebellion (Tea
Party, Boston Massacre) from the Green Dragon Tavern.
Boston's Green Dragon Tavern, headquarters of both the Sons of Liberty and St. Andrew's
Lodge
I thought from the title the theme was going to be a far subtler one, not the 'what a gimme
for The Left', the line which everyone still able to publish has taken. I'd argue that 6 Jan
brings peak Democrat hubris forward so pulls nemesis – the revelation of the red tooth
and claw of unhinged, vote-losing socialism – much nearer (say 2022).
Good points. Flip the script tell the truth make it happen.
Yet people still don't believe in Karma?????????
What we need to do is stop tolerating/subsidizing evil.
Easier said than done you say?You're probably right.
Hard to get it out there though,most seem TOO invested in
continuing their blissful expertise .
Looks to me that it's finally beginning to end or not
Yes, and there is also the clear evidence of capitol police standing aside, waving
protestors toward the building, lining the halls to get out of their way as they entered, and
leading them up the correct set of stairs. It was a set up, like what Roosevelt achieved at
Pearl Harbor.
The writer does not say so though it is implied .this 'event' screamed it was STAGED.
Beginning with the most obvious why were the crowd allowed in at all? It's just another of
these 'hoaxes' and with Biden in charge look for many more. Didn't the whole 'hoax' method
(Sandy Hook, Boston Bombing, etc etc) take off during the Obama/Biden years? As Chuck Shumer
said recently "Buckle Up"
1/6 was a false flag attack following the theft of the 2020 election. The purpose? To
establish Chinese style Totalitarianism on behalf of what Pepe Escobar refers to as Techno
Feudalism.
Nothing good can come from Democrats and/or Republicans. Democrats and Republicans have
ruined our Country. Why is Orange Man Bad? Becuase the Deplorables defeated both Parties in
2016. It won't happen again. Nothing good can come from the District of Corruption. Separation
is the ONLY way forward. Why is anyone still talking about future elections?
@Sue Dunham as a
cue to pretend you were shot, if you are, in fact, pretending. So, if the "exaggerated
movement" is your proof that it was "acting," then it was not acting but real. That it was
otherwise a set-up, and "an inside job" by the same people who run Antifa is obvious. That the
police removed the barricades and waved the people to come in, led by bussed in Antifa Judas
goats, is also obvious and well documented. You could say all of America, white and black, was
shot at that moment. Just because all of the fake killings the last few years by white people
are a staged show to incriminate the innocent and create the illusion of "White Supremacy,"
does not mean that the Deep State does not kill when it serves their interest.
Chucky wants to take your guns away, but he knew how to shoot and somewhere on the net is
a
better phrenic matchup than this would suggest, but hairlines do speak as well
"For the present-day ensemble of Democratic elites – Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Nancy
Pelosi, et. al. – January Sixth at the Capitol could not have been more timely, more
opportune. Truly another godsend. A jolt to the system, however feeble, partial, and ill-fated,
would justify sustained authoritarian force across the public landscape. Seen as vile agents of
treachery, Republicans would be thrown onto the defensive, immobilized. "
The author does not seem to be aware yet that the whole invasion was a
CIA/FBI/Antifa/BLM/Q-Anon staged, planned false flag event, [complete with a staged shooting],
with the intent to demonize Trump and his supporters [and to arrest some of them on the spot,
eg Alex Jones and Roger Stone].
A set up from the git go.
SWAT teams came to Roger Stones D.C. hotel room [luckily he'd already left town after
smelling something rotten in the air]. Since then his 70 yr old wife was viciously attacked in
FL. by an anonymous bike rider [Antifa?] who deliberately ran over her body at least 3 times
[she's now under intensive care in a FL hospital, and Stone himself has gone into hiding,
apparently].
A SWAT team also came for Jones in DC [apparently], but local police refused to co-operate
with Feds to the best of my knowledge at present, so that take down didn't go as planned for
the Fed goons either.
Ashli died very quickly, You can see her hands going into tetanic contractions within a very
few seconds of her collapse. She was bleeding internally through her esophagus or wind pipe and
the blood was coming out her mouth. As your heart stops, so does the bleeding.
Curiously this is the second time you have posted this exact same comment, even with the
exact same "Thank you for writing this" to start. Even more curious, your first reply and
agreement comes from the exact same person who agreed with you then (Jan. 15). Who curiously
posted the exact same response he posted then. Are you posing as both? Very convenient, if
true.
I think that they are afraid that old Jubal Early is pissed off about all the Confederate
statues being desecrated and that he is going to rise from the dead, whoop those useless
Yankees and threaten Washington once more
General Early and the Army of the Valley Movements Map
I think most of you are missing the point about the events of 1-6. The only really relevant
photos of that day are the ones of US Congress"men" cowering in abject terror under their
desks, or running in abject terror to their precious "safe" location away from the Capitol
building.
This is the very public demonstration of true sniveling cowardice in a manner that cannot be
naysayed or denied in any way. And now the entire world knows it. Having been so publicly outed
as low grade cowards, we can now expect, going forward, that every reaction of the US Congress
will be a grotesque, and violent, overreaction.
There is also the issue of the 25,000 National [Guard] called in for the [inauguration].
They did give cover for the abysmally small crowd attending the inauguration. From the pics,
it hardly looked to be more than a thousand. Trump had more than that lining the streets when he
returned to Mar-a-Lago.
So of course, the "threat" of further horrendous violence from those oh so vicious Trump
supporters still hiding in the city since Jan. 6 deterred a full half million of those
enthusiastic Biden supporters who so wanted to see him take the oath.
@Schuetze Why would
he shoot with Capitol police standing in the line of fire back in the stairwell?
Winter also tries to make the case that John Sullivan was inciting the riot when there is no
footage yet produced of Sullivan doing anything more than recording events as he saw them, which
is what he said he was doing. He published an hour-long video and nothing there shows him doing
anything physical. He did say things like "Let's burn that shit down" but it could not have been
heard by many (if any) people near him and there is no indication anyone else was paying
attention to him. He was, it seems, simply narrating and role-playing.
I only learned in the last 4 to 5 years what despicable old hags Pelosi and Hillary are.
They compete for being the most despicable with Hillary suggesting Trump was in contact with
Russian President Putin on January 6 to keep him updated on the so called "insurrection". For
over 75 years Americans, most often Jews, have called Germany's Josef Goebbels a liar but I
can't recall the last time they said what he supposedly lied about. No one can compete with
Americans like Hillary Clinton and American Jews like Adam Schiff for being the most unabashed
liars in the world. And it's the Lying Jewish media with mini-mes like CNN's head Jeff Zucker
that create these deliberately false narratives for their stooges Pelosi and Clinton to
propagate. As former Congressman Ron Paul suggested yesterday, no country has interfered in
more foreign elections than the USA.
It would be glorious if Trump ran for President again. I don't expect it and I would think
he would not want to become a human punching bag again, but I believe he would win if his
forces could prevent another fraudulent election. There is no force in the USA as powerful as
the media and it's the same in most "democratic" countries. How glorious it would be too if the
old hags had enough of letting themselves be used by people like Zucker and Twitter's Jack
Dorsey and turned on them and had the justice department put those despicables in jail. Oh, how
glorious. One can dream. But that is unlikely and what is more likely is that within the next
ten years the world won't care much what is happening in the USA, for the USA is in for a big
fall which will reduce its power and influence greatly.
That said, Republicans control the legislatures in quite a few states, and the Constitution
gives those states plenary power over election law, particularly for President and the
Congress. Changing the law to mandate paper ballots and voter ID while eliminating the machines
and mail-in ballots would probably expose the fraud and regain the House and Senate in the
mid-terms.
I remember the film of the vc prisoner, who while being held by guards was shot suddenly in
the temple. The amount of blood forcefully streaming from the hole in his head was both
astonishing and gruesome. I don't know if happened because of being shot in the head though, as
opposed to being shot in the body. Or maybe the bullet hit the artery.
That was a concise truthful account of what we are up against again, Mr. Boggs. Thank
you.
Even the pundit Ann Coulter, someone I've appreciated being on my side for more than a
decade, has fallen for some of this bullshit out of the Lyin' Press in their ceaseless
Infotainment. From her latest column (otherwise, one I agree with):
The raid was disgusting, appalling, sickening, but it's not a license for concocting
imaginary accusations. Trump is bad. The thugs who stormed the Capitol are bad. You don't
need to manufacture evidence against them, media.
Peak Stupidity notes that she lied by using the terms "raid", "disgusting",
and "thugs", in the post "Et tu, Ann?"
Will Ann Coulter, even, be suckered into supporting anti-"domestic-terrorism" laws, just as
she went for the "fight them over there " crap after 9/11? There are cooler heads that don't
get emotionally suckered in by the Lyin' Press narrative. We are the ones they are aiming at
with the new round of oppression to come.
" Fascistic politics has a tendency to devour its own ruthless protagonists."
It has already done .Bush or more precisely Cheney to Tea Party to MAGA false prophet of Trump
is linear and traces only a tiny distance.
False hope is entertained because desperation and anger demand it . Obama and Trump are two
sides of the same coin , Both hurt the believers and the faithful most and did
intentionally.
"Since the clash now appears to have been inevitable, its occurrence brings with it a
sense of relief. The air is clearer. Americans can now get down to their task [of waging war]
with the old obstacles finally removed, forgotten."
This would apply equally well to a US civil war . It would clear the air,
people/organizations commit to one side or the other and get on with it.
Agreed. It was truly satisfying to watch uniparty kleptocrat cowards, who torture us daily
with bad laws and invitations for invading hordes, scrambling for their escape choo-choo
train.
@Peripatetic Itch
on in Syria, preceded by waves of Iraeli bombings and missile strikes. Iraq has also been under
the zio-genocide hammer.
Clearly, the next move in the US is going to be the gun grab, and they will try to focus it
on "white supremacists". This is the narrative construction we see going on, of which Babbit
likely was part of. During the Trump administration there seemed to be far fewer false flags. I
would bet that we are about to see a flurry of "white supremacists" shooting up various
synogogues, jewish graveyards, black churches, and I would not be at all surprised if the grand
climax was the bombing of a "holocaust" museum.
Hitler was the only leader in history that knew exactly what must be done with communists.
If you allow even one communist to live in your land, your freedom is at risk. In my view, the
only thing that will remove them now and thus save America is for a Hitlarian type figure to
rise up and ruthlessly deal with the communists in politics, the Judeo media complex, the
courts, and academia. He rounded them up in the 1930's and that is the only way to stop them
now. If that isn't done soon, they will be rounding us up which they are making very clear.
How about all those available resources to fortify the capital since the Big Capital Walk
Thru? Were concrete and metal fence producers considered essential during all our lockdowns?
Did they miraculously have inventory waiting for DC to come beckoning?
@Schuetze every
possible misdemeanor in her life, from accusations of deliberate assault by car to restraining
orders, to adultery, to her "fanatical" propensity to rant, to living in a threesome, as you
say. Her death, on the other hand, is treated matter-of-factly, as if to say, What else would
you expect for such a flaky dumb-ass? No mention that she was not armed.
Compare that to what they did for George Floyd. He came out as a saint who had only wanted
to be president as a kid. Gone to Minneapolis to start a "new life" as I recall. Barely a
mention of his home invasion, holding a gun to the belly of a pregnant woman, possibly raping
her.
__________________
* Hitler and Germans were lucky that Russians/Slavs were not as vengeful as Germans'
Anglo-Saxon kin, who burned about 100,000 or so German civilians – old men, women,
children – just to show what they are capable of. Stalin could have created 100s of
Dresdens, and nobody could have stopped him.
** I understand there is an organized, decades long effort to erase that wonderful
trait.
@GeneralRipper
especially since the servile House democrats don't have the guts to vote her out as Speaker?
And she will continue to be easily re-elected in her far-left district, no matter how senile
and delusional she is.
Think Strom Thurmond in his last years. He lived to be 1oo, dying in office. In fact, since
women live longer than men, Pelosi may finally collapse for the last time when she is 110,
still firmly clutching her gold-plated gavel that she refused to give up. After rigor mortis
sets in, they won't be able to pry it out of her cold dead hand, so she'll be buried with it,
and will lie in State in the Capitol Rotunda for a month.
Anyone trying to find the edges of the U.S. Overton Window right now must feel like they're
tracing an amateur rendition of an early Picasso. After a summer spent chanting "defund the
police," self-identifying progressives applaud the pouring of some 25,000 troops and busloads
of out-of-city law enforcement into the streets of Washington, DC. Those eager to cheer the
departure of a racist, sexist, war-hawking elitist from the White House were quick to welcome a
new racist, sexist, war-hawking elitist. Those who lambasted Trump for dragging more swamp
creatures into the swamp rather than draining it are applauding Biden for his diverse cabinet
appointments, ignoring the revolving
door of corruption and oppression they represent. Those who (correctly) decried the Paris
Climate Agreement for being flimsy and non-committal are celebrating Biden's executive orde
There was fraud everywhere in the 2020 election and to not address this
is to destroy the future of our children while stomping on the graves of those who died for this country.
We've
pointed out literally a million invalid ballots which were included in the 'certified' results in the 2020 election in three
states alone:
Now
today, we have a copy of the letter from data analyst Bobby Piton to the Arizona legislature in December. Remember, Piton
testified in front of the Arizona legislature about the blatant fraud in that state and bet his life on the results.
Today
can report on a letter Piton sent to the Arizona legislature in December. He pointed out that more that 50% of a sample of
1,000 voters in the 2020 election were not real people. The sample came from a list of 100,000 voters in the 2020 election in
Arizona.
Pitton
also notes that 200,000 Pennsylvania ballots were edited the day after the election. The
letter
from Bobby Piton
to the Arizona legislature is below:
The
Arizona legislature did pass a motion to forensically audit the votes in Maricopa County, the most populous county in the
state which includes Phoenix. But now the Board of Supervisors are attempting to prevent a 'real' audit from the likes of
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer and instead have their choice of auditor perform the audit.
The efforts to prevent the people of Arizona from knowing the truth
about the results of the 2020 election continue.
Please contact Arizona's Legislature and let them know you want Jovan
Hutton Pulitzer to perform the forensic audit in Maricopa County of the ballots from the election. Americans and Arizonians
deserve the truth.
Submit a Correction
Share
on
Facebook
Tweet
Share
Email
Joe Hoft
Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP's founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and
have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the
world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or
designations and is the author of three books. His new book: 'In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics'
is out now - please take a look and buy a copy.
@joehoft
Personally I don't care what political side one is on..... this IS about the process !
If the corruption of the process is NOT fixed, then this Country IS dead !
That is why we need to keep protesting in the millions without the Trump and MAGA hats. Do not
associate with any group and protest as everyday average Jane and Joe Americans - that way the tyrants
cannot label us to any affiliation.
The kkk has been resurrected and is operating in full swing by the left. Everyone
the left appears to embrace from those with deviant sexual behavior to those of
certain races are pawns. They use them to advance their totalitarian agenda. Once
the commiecraps get what they want, the pawns will be eliminated.
Unorganized protest will never even get out the front door. You must have leadership to direct
people's efforts. War doesn't always means military and firearms. Weapons can be simply protest signs,
advertisements on tv and online, mass mailings, phone calls, supplies is money to make the signs, to
purchase the ads, tools and equipment to make protest signs, food, water, car pools to get those who
can't or don't have the means to travel and reduce over all cost. Business is war, and war is
business.
Ask any union boss about strikes and all the planning that goes into one. You just don't show up one
day and get pissed off and tell the boss hey I'm going on strike and hope others will just get fed up
like you and walk off. Nope that almost never happens.
There is always talk, planning, defining of goals and so on. Even boycotts don't work unless there is
a clearly defining means of what is the purpose of the boycotts and what it takes to end it. Unified
effort gets noticed and produces results. Random effort isn't even noticed by anyone. So go ahead and
do your own independent protest and let's see how far you get. Now you get tens of thousands to
millions of people to go along with you, now you get CHANGE. Even in Hong Kong, it's a quagmire. No
good organized protesting.
A whole bunch of people causing chaos and a lot of people dying, jailed, and flat out disappearing.
When someone does come on board and start organizing the resistance, they start making head way until
the CCP whacks the person off and then it's back to ineffective chaos.
That is where clear lines of authority comes into play. When the leader is disposed, a recognized new
one takes the person's place without a hiccup and the battle continues.
They should iether explain proven anomalies or shut up Jan 23, 2021
The burden of proof remains upon those claiming the election was honest to provide
irrefutable evidence to support the claim.
Presidential vote fraud is immaterial, anyway, because the US Constitution empowers each
State Legislature to assign Electoral College Electors any way they so choose. If State
Legislatures choose their Electors according to the fake results from fake elections, that is
their Constitutional right to do so. Even if the States pass laws to the contrary, if they
choose not to prosecute their own lawbreaking, the outcome is the same: whatever the State
Legislatures want or tolerate irregardless of votes from the People. Constitutionally,
Presidential elections are decided by votes of the People for their respective State
Legislators, you remember, those nameless, low-paid, locally elected State Representatives and
State Senators. 1 0 Reply
Bill Beeby , Jan 23, 2021 9:41 AM
Trump was the perfect catalyst for this to happen it would seem and he is well out of it.
Old Joe has some tough times ahead and compared to Trump he is a pushover.
@83. The world just witnessed TOTAL collusion between big business and a so called left
government, right here in the USof A. Did u really just come here and say fascism is from the
right only. Wow dude yer seriously bent. Happy to be wrong. If u didnt say that then please
explain what you ment.
By 8 January 2021, Mitch McConnell had determined he would not permit the Senate to try
Trump until 19 January 2021 or later. He ruled that the Senate could not convene for special
session unless all 100 Senators formally agreed; he maintained that ruling consistently,
through 19 January 2021. By 10 January 2021, House majority Whip James Clyburn suggested the
House may not deliver articles of impeachment to the Senate until after Biden has been in
Office 100 days.
Not until today, 20 January 2021, did Pelosi deliver articles of impeachment to the Senate.
The same day, McConnell said: (a) the Senate will receive the House managers at noon ET
Thursday, 21 January, when the managers will present and exhibit the articles; (b) at 2:00 PM
21 January, Chief Justice John Roberts will be escorted into the Senate chamber and swear in
all senators; (c) the impeachment articles' trial will begin Tuesday, 26 January.
Until 20 or 21 January, the Senate majority would remain Republican; and a GOP-majority
Senate would not only acquit Trump but also impeach, strongly, the articles of impeachment. So,
why did Mitch McConnell block early Senate trial? Two possible intersecting reasons:
has
said Trump fed the "mob" lies to provoke the mob to use violence to prevent Congress's
certification of Biden's election.] (b) If trial occurs (as it will) when the Democrats
control the Senate, a conviction might seem a Democrat-framed lynching -- not the GOP's
traitorous assassination of Trump's "populism" and his political career.
I do not suggest such reasons are wise, logical, or even rational, but possibly real.
McConnell is a crafty, dissembling, unscrupulous pseudo-aristocrat, but no Socrates or
Aristotle.
"Liberal" and "moderate" Democrats, never-Trump Republicans,"The Squad, " the "Deep State"
-- the nation's whole jumble of psychopathic and otherwise-psychically-ill "Elite," "woke,"
anti-"White"/anti-male/anti-meritocracy/sexually-deviant members -- all share one mantra :
Trump and populism are evil, inimical to "Democracy" and the "culture," "morality," and "public
interests" of the U.S. Populism must be extinguished. Never again may Trump "hold and enjoy any
Office or honor, Trust or Profit under the United States" [U.S. Constitution Article I § 3
clause 7].
Why ought anyone care?
I voted twice for Trump, the second time (2020) merely because he was the lesser evil. In
2016, Trump promised more than a few moves that would have bettered the nation, e.g.
,
Trump meant and honored some promises -- at least partly. But others -- (a), (b), (f), (h),
(i), and (k) -- were bad jokes. His Israel policy was evil. He railed against growing
impairment of free speech. But his concern was mostly his own freedom of expression; and he
failed to do anything substantial toward restoring the general public's freedom of speech. He
continued, and worsened, Obama's persecution of Julian Assange and Bradley ["Chelsea"] Manning.
Edward Snowden remains exiled. Trump has pardoned or commuted sentence of tens of nefarious
criminals, but not Assange, Manning, or Snowden.
Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, George W Bush, and Obama supported the
illegal "state" called Israel. But Trump lifted Israel-support, and, concomitantly, anti-Iran
policy to insane levels. Trump's Israel-related domestic policy included design of blocking or
impeding first-amendment-protected speech and assembly that opposes Israel's genocidal
persecution of Palestinians. Trump rendered formal equation of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism
and sought to outlaw the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction movement.
So, why ought we care whether, after Trump is not President, the Senate tries the articles
of impeachment of Trump and rules that Trump shall not "hold and enjoy any Office or honor,
Trust or Profit under the United States"? Why ought we care even whether simply the Senate
tries the articles of impeachment but acquits Trump?
Trump's 2016 election suggested a true populist might become President -- not a closet
"Elite," but one who would resist the Elites and the Deep State, not surround himself with
snakes of the swamp. If the Senate tries Trump and rules that Trump shall not "hold and enjoy
any Office or honor, Trust or Profit under the United States" because Trump and his supporters
exercised their First Amendment freedom of speaking and assembling to support populism and
protest a corrupt election, speech and assembly freedoms will cease and near-certainly no
capable, electable populist will run for the Presidency.
But that consideration is subsumed in another, greater, more vital, fundamental
concern. We have a federal Constitution. Every federal legislator and judge promises, by oath,
not to act contrary to that Constitution. Every federal judge must promise this: "I solemnly
swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right
to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform
all the duties incumbent upon me under the Constitution and laws of the United States."
...You live in a totalitarian state with arbitrary power.
Your government has three branches: CIA, CIA, and CIA. They infest every other corner of
your government with spies. Until you can accept this you will be an irrelevant muppet
writing bullshit.
... ... ...
4. Every jew ever involved in health care fraud over the past 100 years
If you might be a Trump supporter, just stop. Trump was an incompetent fraud. And Biden
(well his handlers really), will be very competent and will soon make you feel the sting of
systemic punishment.
Everyone can claim some African ancestry. Suggest you get familiar with the process real
quick
Back in 1987, as a young political science major, my constitutional law professor made us
attend a lecture by a visiting scholar on the 200th anniversary of the Constitutional
Convention. I cannot remember who the lecturer was, but I do recall one phrase he used that
has stuck in my mind ever since: the Constitution only works if we have a "constitutional
frame of mind." In other words, the Constitution reflected the culture and the attitudes of
its authors. Today, elites in both parties could give a damn about the Constitution. They
simply ignore the Constitution when it suits them -- or, conversely, use it as a club to
bludgeon their enemies when it suits them.
Today we are reduced to parsing the language of the Constitution because nobody is really
committed to the upholding the culture and the attitudes that informed it when it was
written. Therefore it has become meaningless.
The president must dance to the tune of the bankers and assorted oligarchs who actually
control the US. They enjoy confusing the common people with changing rhetoric and theater,
but at the end of the day, the president is little more than a figurehead, and the policies
remain largely the same. Many do not realize that the Obama administration deported some
2,750,000 illegals.. Under Trump it was only 935,000. Foreign wars? Police brutality? the
rich getting richer? Prison industrial complex? decimation of the middle class? endless
currency debasement? these things are consistent regardless, because they represent the
interests of the actual rulers. The red candidate throws a bone to the "conservatives", the
blue candidate throws a bone to the socialists, but the policy makers continue from one
administration to the next. The last president who tried to stand up to the powers that be
was JFK . and look what they did to him.
Tucker Carlson said Monday or Tuesday night on his show that McConnell warned Trump not to
pardon Assange, and he held the impeachment over Trump's head.
Swampington has gone rogue. I have a feeling that during much of Trump's presidency the
threat of impeachment loomed large, and maybe worse.
Look at Sessions, recusing himself and cowering in the corner. Barr comes in and does
diddly squat. The Durham investigation was a very long joke.
Two years of the Mueller Commission (when everybody in the know knew it was a pack of
lies), spying, leaking, abuse of the FISA Court, Kavanaugh, impeachment over Ukraine, Covid,
Antifa, BLM, stolen election ..never-ending chaos.
These corrupt clowns will do whatever the hell they please. They are the law now. If they
do end up following the law, it will only be because the destruction they've caused already
will be deemed to be enough.
With the federal judiciary's corrupt or cowardly treatment of legitimate
election-result challenges, the federal judiciary has shown it has abnegated its
constitutional duty and will incline to commit impeachable offenses to avoid resisting the
Elites' and the Deep State's subjugation of the People. The Supreme Court has shown that
five or more pseudo-aristocrat judges (two Democrats, three or more Republicans) align with
the Elites and the Deep State. Dr. Paul Craig Roberts is correct. The People are
suffering a revolution wrought by the "Establishment" (of the Elites and the Deep
State).
I would say that they are more cowardly than corrupt.
They know that if they supported Trump's legitimate (good evidence) questioning of the
election result, they would personally be in big trouble, so the Supreme Court is really not
a Supreme Court at all – it's a piece of establishment window dressing – same as
the rest of the hollowed out US Democratic institutions.
Real power in the US lies with the ZioGlob deep state and their MSM, the military
(whichever way they turn), and the 72 million US gun owners (whatever they decide to do).
There's also the aspect of real military power outside the US (Russia and China) that could
be brought to bear, and would be potentially decisive. Accepted that some of these are
TEOTWAWKI (The End Of The World As We Know It) scenarios but that seems to be how it is.
Genuine Democracy isn't coming back to the US any time soon.
@Beavertales at, do you really think Trump will discuss anything that went on in private?
He is not the type to write a memoir.
And some of the most bizarre decisions he made while POTUS were as a result of "advice"
from his favourite daughter Ivanka and her repellant husband. Ann Coulter has an article
where she lists the boneheaded decisions Trump made on "advice" from the two incompetent
rich-kids..
This short video is very indicative of the stupidity of Ivanka: she is so stupid, that she
can't even see the contempt these politicians have for her, and sticks around like a bad
smell:
[French Government Posts Video Of Ivanka Trump At G-20 Summit | NBC News]
McConnell must, not maybe, must be the first person to go if the Republican Senate has any
chance of surviving in a way that serves conservative interests. He has been positively of
Zero support to president Trumps four years in office, only giving lip service to the
interests of the issues the presidents supporters wanted addressed.. For four long years,
McConnell was an expert at bringing every advance, or potential advance in conservative
interests to naught. He however, had no problemo at all in taking advantage of President
Trumps popularity with conservative voters, when his re-election was in doubt. Maybe his
middle name should be Mitt.
@anonymous ChiComs -- from whence In Laws $ all arises . McConnell shows the country is
totally sold out to the ChiComs and in fact "governed" by them -- the rest of Congrassholes
are about the same with various "spies" working them, having sex with them, and screwing us
-- the USA is an occupied country via IsraHell and the Chinese Communists -- very, very bad
days are ahead and most in the USA are moron mask wearers who actually believe the filthy
pieces of cloth do something for their "health" contrary to all actual 41 Medical Studies to
date which state the opposite -- truly Maskholing was an IQ test and the country failed to
reach even the level of "Moron". Easy to steal an election when dealing with Maskhole Morons.
Sad all are being pulled down by them .
@Aardvark you are charged by the Feds you will be railroaded, innocence means zero once
you are charged and all the "Judge" cares about is getting you to plead guilty and move the
case, you will be grossly overcharged to force this to happen and the Judge will glare at you
and let you know he hates you if you go forward -- unless you are a Leftist Political hack or
"activist" then you will be cut loose and probably never even charged ."justice" Roberts is
the "model" -- his rulings in Obamacare etc. show he has no care for the actual "law" at all
-- all the other Federal "judges" follow his example .The best thing that could happen to the
USA is for the end of the Federal Courts, DOJ, and FBI -- all are Enemies Of The People --
get involved with them and find out.
@FoSquare The works of Plato and Aristotle have had much influence on the modern view of
the "sophist" as a greedy instructor who uses rhetorical sleight-of-hand and ambiguities of
language in order to deceive, or to support fallacious reasoning. In this view, the sophist
is not concerned with truth and justice, but instead seeks power.
Societies that value truth but recognize the difficulties involved in discovering it also
put value on freedom of expression. Those interested in power for its own sake, not so much.
Unfortunately the power mongers always have the advantage of moral certainty. For them Alinsky
and the Protocols are the only bibles.
@Anon olling 90% of the mass media of mindfuckery, mesmerization and mass megalomania and
finally, the CIA financed and directed "Social Media", the greatest enemy of our First
Amendment rights;;; those nefarious forces nearing absolute control over the federal regime in
the Di$trict of Corruption have now fully succeeded in driving the last nail into the coffin of
the Constitution AND the Bill of Rights, the enabling precondition for establishment of the
federal system.
Behind the scenes, roaring and howling with fits of schadenfreude laughter; the ultimate
shotcallers, those OWNER$ of the Federal Reserve and most other major international banking
institutions, are rubbing their greasy palm$ with total glee by having pulled off the greatest
heist in world history.
Former President Trump is playing his final scene today, making ready to hand over the
lead part of a government like reality show to the mentally infirm Joe Biden. Biden, with
history of pathological lying and a trail of crimes and associations with other crimes had no
actual chance of winning a real election, but real elections are now only part of America's
history. Trumped & Dumped: The Psychological Operation Scrambles to Survive | Jack Mullen
https://blog.thegovernmentrag.com/2021/01/21/trumped-dumped-psychological-operation-enters-phase-two/
@Old and Grumpy wn individual of blackmail able importance -- was discovered in one of
Ep$tein's logs).
Anyone notice how the Joint Chiefs of $taff for the U$ armed forces put out a notice to all
military personnel that they must not participate in acts of sedition prior to the coronation
of the Kamal's Foote/Biding administration.? Since the days of their attempted Operation
Northwoods false flag scheme to attack Cuba, which was vetoed by JFK (among his other sins
against the Deepe$t $tate); the proof was already in the pudding that the JC$ is dirty and our
military is compromised by their chains of command from the top-down -- which is the way the
enemies of We The People choose to employ their nefarious control system over one and all --
excepting, of course, the Elite$ themselves.
@Mefobills of savvy self-promoter and foil for Hillary. That would explain a lot,
especially Hillary's (and the Democrats) absolute hatred of Trump and his supporters. That his
shtick worked is testament to both his talent for self-promotion and our dislike of Hillary.
Guess she miscalculated
In any case, it became obvious that either the fix was in, when he refused to back Flynn and
appointed swamp creatures to fill his administrations' posts, or Trump was a fool. But that's
not to say he wasn't useful in exposing the media and deep state's contempt, hatred and fear of
us -- deplorables all -- by personifying it in their attacks on him.
The question that matters now, for populists, is how do we avoid the leadership trap?
For the most part, our entire legal profession has been taken over by an overeducated,
inexperienced crowd of people who are not able to deal in "Letter" and "Spirit" of law. They're
prisoners of the letter of the law because their only background is of the spoken and written
word.
"... Consequently, there is no sense of irony among the McFauls of the world as US security strategy is committed to global dominance, while berating Russia for "revisionism." ..."
ByGlenn Diesen, Professor at the University of South-Eastern Norway, and an editor at the Russia in Global
Affairs journal. Follow him on Twitter @glenndiesen
Donald Trump's efforts to reduce the ideologically driven base of US foreign policy fuelled great resentment among those who believed
it betrayed Washington's leadership position in the so-called "liberal international order."
Now that power has changed, will the pendulum swing in the opposite direction, with Joe Biden's administration applying a radical
ideological foreign policy?
A recent article by Michael McFaul, once Barack Obama's ambassador to Russia and a noted 'Russiagate' conspiracy theorist, indicates
what such an ideological foreign policy would look like. McFaul's article, 'How to Contain Putin's Russia', makes a case for a containment
policy.
Containment: learning from the past or living in the past?
To advance his argument, McFaul quotes George Kennan, the author of the Long Telegram and architect of erstwhile US containment
policy against the Soviet Union. McFaul suggests that Kennan's advocacy for a "patient but firm and vigilant containment"
against the revolutionary Bolshevik regime 75 years ago remains as valid as ever.
It would have made more sense to
quote Kennan when
he condemned NATO expansionism and predicted it would trigger another Cold War. As Kennan noted: "there was no reason for this
whatsoever. No one was threatening anybody else. This expansion would make the Founding Fathers of this country turn over in their
graves."
Kennan continued to express disbelief over the rhetoric by the misinformed US leadership, presenting "Russia as a country dying
to attack Western Europe. Don't people understand? Our differences in the Cold War were with the Soviet Communist regime. And now
we are turning our backs on the very people who mounted the greatest bloodless revolution in history to remove that Soviet regime."
Kennan then went on to correctly predict that, when Russia would eventually react to US provocations, the NATO expanders would wrongfully
blame Russia.
Ideologues often have nostalgia for the Cold War, when the bipolar power distribution was supported by a clear and comfortable
ideological divide. The Western bloc represented capitalism, Christianity, and democracy, while the Eastern bloc represented communism,
atheism, and authoritarianism. This ideological divide supported internal cohesion within the Western bloc and drew clear borders
with the adversary.
The liberal international order has attempted to recast the former capitalist-communist divide with a liberal-authoritarian divide.
However, the ideological incompatibility between American liberalism and Russian conservatism is less convincing. For example, McFaul
cautions against Putin's nefarious conservative ideology committed to "Christian, traditional family values" that threatens
the liberal international order.
The new ideological divide nonetheless advances neo-McCarthyism in the West. McFaul presents a list of European conservatives
and populists that should be treated as American conservatives, purged from political life as enemies of the liberal international
order and thus possible agents of Russia. Hillary Clinton even suggested that the Capitol Hill riots were possibly coordinated by
Trump and Putin – yes, Russiagate is here to stay. The solution, for McFaul, is for American tech oligarchs to manipulate algorithms
to protect populations from Russian-friendly media.
An American ideological project
McFaul cautions against what he refers to as "Putin's ideological project" as a threat to the liberal international order.
Yet he is reluctant to recognize that the liberal international order is an American ideological project for the post-Cold War era.
After the Cold War, liberal ideologues advanced what was seemingly a benign proposition – suggesting that liberal democracy should
be at the center of security strategies. However, by linking liberal norms to US leadership, liberalism became both a constitutional
principle and an international hegemonic norm.
NATO is presented as a community of liberal values – without mentioning that its second largest member, Turkey, is more conservative
and authoritarian than Russia – and Moscow does not, therefore, have any legitimate reasons to oppose expansionism unless it fears
democracy. If Russia reacts negatively to military encirclement, it is condemned as an enemy of democracy, and NATO has a moral responsibility
to revert to its original mission as a military bloc containing Russia.
Case in point: there was nobody in Moscow advocating for the reunification with Crimea until the West supported the coup in Ukraine.
Yet, as Western "fact checkers" and McFaul inform us, there was a "democratic revolution" and not a coup. Committed
to his ideological prism, McFaul suggests that Russia acted out of a fear of having a democracy on its borders, as it would give
hope to Russians and thus threaten the Kremlin. McFaul's ideological lens masks conflicting national security interests, and it fails
to explain why Russia does not mind democratic neighbors in the east, such as South Korea and Japan, with whom it enjoys good relations.
Defending the peoples
States aspiring for global hegemony have systemic incentives to embrace ideologies that endow them with the right to defend other
peoples. The French National Convention declared in 1792 that France would "come to the aid of all peoples who are seeking to
recover their liberty," and the Bolsheviks proclaimed in 1917 "the duty to render assistance, armed, if necessary, to the
fighting proletariat of the other countries."
The American liberal international order similarly aims to liberate the people of the world with "democracy promotion"
and "humanitarian interventionism" when it conveniently advances US primacy. The American ideological project infers that
democracy is advanced by US interference in the domestic affairs of Russia, while democracy is under attack if Russia interferes
in the domestic affairs of US. The liberal international system is one of sovereign inequality to advance global primacy.
McFaul does not consider himself a Russophobe, as believes his attacks against Russia are merely motivated by the objective of
liberating Russians from their government, which is why he advocates that Biden "distinguish between Russia and Russians – between
Putin and the Russian people." This has been the modus operandi for regime change since the end of the Cold War – the US supposedly
does not attack countries to advance its interests, it only altruistically assists foreign peoples in rival states against their
leaders such as Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin etc.
McFaul and other liberal ideologues still refer to NATO as a "defensive alliance," which does not make much sense after
the attacks on Yugoslavia in 1999 or Libya in 2011. However, under the auspices of liberal internationalism, NATO is defensive, as
it defends the people of the world. Russia, therefore, doesn't have rational reasons for opposing the liberal international order.
McFaul condemns alleged efforts by Russia to interfere in the domestic affairs of the US, before outlining his strategies for
interfering in the domestic affairs of Russia. McFaul blames Russian paranoia for shutting down American "non-governmental organizations"
that are funded by the US government and staffed by people linked to the US security apparatus. He goes on to explain that the US
government must counter this by establishing new "non-government organizations" to educate the Russian public about the evils
of their government.
The dangerous appeal of ideologues
Ideologues have always been dangerous to international security. Ideologies of human freedom tend to promise perpetual peace.
Yet, instead of transcending power politics, the ideals of human freedom are linked directly to hegemonic power by the self-proclaimed
defender of the ideology. When ideologues firmly believe that the difference between the current volatile world and utopia can be
bridged by defeating its opponents, it legitimizes radical power politics.
Consequently, there is no sense of irony among the McFauls of the world as US security strategy is committed to global dominance,
while berating Russia for "revisionism."
Raymond Aaron once wrote: "Idealistic diplomacy slips too often into fanaticism; it divides states into good and evil, into
peace-loving and bellicose. It envisions a permanent peace by the punishment of the latter and the triumph of the former. The idealist,
believing he has broken with power politics, exaggerates its crimes."
If you like this story, share it with a friend!
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RT.
"... "Blinken acknowledged that the US must set an example at home on what it preaches abroad. He also stressed the need for "humility". But he insisted nonetheless that the US' global leadership "still matters" since the world is incapable of organising itself "when we're not leading," as some other country may usurp America's lead role impacting "our interests and values", or, simply, chaos may follow! ..."
"... At any rate, Blinken has pledged to "revitalise American diplomacy" and address the challenges of "rising nationalism, reseeding democracy, growing rivalry from China, and Russia and other authoritarian states, mounting threats to a stable and open international system and a technological revolution that is reshaping every aspect of our lives, especially in cyberspace." ..."
I would not set too much store by Plato's political philosophy. For Plato, the political
ideal was a society of three layers: philosopher kings who rule, guardians (the military),
producers / workers.
Ideally philosopher kings would be trained from childhood, adolescence or young adulthood
onwards to be rational and to think in terms of what is best for society as a whole. They
would be trained to be selfless and to shun the pursuit of material wealth.
There are many criticisms that can be made of Plato's ideal society. One such criticism
among others is that philosopher kings / rulers may have a very narrow idea of what is best
for society as a whole and may lead their people into trouble with, erm, "noble lies" (in
whatever form the propaganda and the cultural conditioning take - and when does a "noble" lie
cease to be "noble" and become just plain outright manipulation and falsehood?) if they
confuse their own interests with the interests of society, when the reality is that their
interests as philosopher kings and the interests of the rest of society are far apart.
The irony I've just uncovered is that the present system of government that exists in the
US looks a little too much like Plato's ideal.
@ Jen | Jan 21 2021 0:50 utc | 114... thanks jen... i was waiting to find out from
juliania, but i appreciate your take on this which seems fairly informed... i know nothing
about all of it, but it was an interesting idea cross purposing bidens inaugurations speech
with platos idea of a or the noble lie... the problem with ideals, is they are hard to live
in reality, thus they remain ideals only.. it sems philosopher kings and political leaders
rely heavily on ideals to make a pitch to the public.. not everyone is receptive to them
though... thanks for your input!
"Blinken acknowledged that the US must set an example at home on what it preaches abroad.
He also stressed the need for "humility". But he insisted nonetheless that the US' global
leadership "still matters" since the world is incapable of organising itself "when we're not
leading," as some other country may usurp America's lead role impacting "our interests and
values", or, simply, chaos may follow!
Now, that's an extraordinary boast so soon after the Capitol Riots whose leitmotif was
Chaos in capital "C". Blinken made a laughable claim. But it also betrays delusional
thinking.
At any rate, Blinken has pledged to "revitalise American diplomacy" and address the
challenges of "rising nationalism, reseeding democracy, growing rivalry from China, and
Russia and other authoritarian states, mounting threats to a stable and open international
system and a technological revolution that is reshaping every aspect of our lives, especially
in cyberspace."
@follyofwar
hat Trump did not, and for which Trump deserves credit: NOT attacking Iran; NOT starting a
war in the Donbass region of Ukraine; and NOT escalating the attack on Syria to the point
where Syria collapses and Al-Nusra and ISIS terrorists take over (which is what Israel has
openly said they would prefer to Assad!) And I am NOT a 'Trumper', think he was a disgusting
zionist boot-licker, and that he didn't do diddly squat of what he promised to do for the
average American, but sure kissed Wall Street's bottom. The problem is, Bidet may be worse,
if his past is any indication.
Regardless, the next four years are gonna be ugly, really ugly, foreign policy-wise, I'm
afraid ..
I would not set too much store by Plato's political philosophy. For Plato, the political
ideal was a society of three layers: philosopher kings who rule, guardians (the military),
producers / workers.
Ideally philosopher kings would be trained from childhood, adolescence or young adulthood
onwards to be rational and to think in terms of what is best for society as a whole. They
would be trained to be selfless and to shun the pursuit of material wealth.
There are many criticisms that can be made of Plato's ideal society. One such criticism
among others is that philosopher kings / rulers may have a very narrow idea of what is best
for society as a whole and may lead their people into trouble with, erm, "noble lies" (in
whatever form the propaganda and the cultural conditioning take - and when does a "noble" lie
cease to be "noble" and become just plain outright manipulation and falsehood?) if they
confuse their own interests with the interests of society, when the reality is that their
interests as philosopher kings and the interests of the rest of society are far apart.
The irony I've just uncovered is that the present system of government that exists in the
US looks a little too much like Plato's ideal.
@ Jen | Jan 21 2021 0:50 utc | 114... thanks jen... i was waiting to find out from
juliania, but i appreciate your take on this which seems fairly informed... i know nothing
about all of it, but it was an interesting idea cross purposing bidens inaugurations speech
with platos idea of a or the noble lie... the problem with ideals, is they are hard to live
in reality, thus they remain ideals only.. it sems philosopher kings and political leaders
rely heavily on ideals to make a pitch to the public.. not everyone is receptive to them
though... thanks for your input!
"Blinken acknowledged that the US must set an example at home on what it preaches abroad.
He also stressed the need for "humility". But he insisted nonetheless that the US' global
leadership "still matters" since the world is incapable of organising itself "when we're not
leading," as some other country may usurp America's lead role impacting "our interests and
values", or, simply, chaos may follow!
Now, that's an extraordinary boast so soon after the Capitol Riots whose leitmotif was
Chaos in capital "C". Blinken made a laughable claim. But it also betrays delusional
thinking. At any rate, Blinken has pledged to "revitalise American diplomacy" and address the
challenges of "rising nationalism, reseeding democracy, growing rivalry from China, and
Russia and other authoritarian states, mounting threats to a stable and open international
system and a technological revolution that is reshaping every aspect of our lives, especially
in cyberspace."
Woman I know was arrested by the FBI for going to the Capitol protest. She's a physician
in her 50s. She did vote for Trump. She does think the hatred directed towards Trump was just
insane. But otherwise she's a standard conventional liberal. It's frightening that someone
like her was arrested.
The FBI must be looking at everyone's credit cards for plane tickets train tickets gas
purchases hotels and meals to see who traveled to DC first week of January.
The MSM has been uniformly portraying the Storming of the Capitol as a deadly attack by
Trumpists, and using it to potentially justify a huge civil-liberties crackdown. Yet with the
sole exception of the one Capitol police officer, all the victims were Trumpists, one unarmed
woman shot by a security guard and the rest who apparently died from strokes or heart-attacks
during all the excitement probably because they were elderly or overweight.
Moreover, I've become extremely suspicious of the official MSM account of the killing of
that officer. Here's a couple of comments I made a couple of days ago about the alleged
killing:
Given that zero details of the incident have come out, I'm getting pretty
suspicious.
I wouldn't be surprised if that cop had died from a heart-attack or something, and his
death was then conflated with the video of the thrown fire-extinguisher. I'm pretty sure
that I read in the NYT that the fire-extinguisher video had nothing to do with the cop's
death, and I'm skeptical that there were two entirely separate fire-extinguisher
incidents.
As a follow-up, my morning NYT stated that the person who threw the fire-extinguisher in
the video has now been charged with "assault." That means it's 100% certain that he didn't
kill that cop.
The cop was the only "regime fatality" in the 1/6 incident, and there seems to be
absolutely no effort to track down his alleged attacker even though national law
enforcement is scouring the country for dozens or hundreds of other minor participants. Why
would they make an all-out effort to catch those individuals who were guilty of trespassing
and disorderly-conduct without trying to locate the supposed pro-Trump cop-killer?
I think the most logical explanation is that there *was* no cop-killer, and the officer
died of more-or-less natural causes, e.g. a stroke brought on by all the excitement
Just as numerous people have emphasized, the whole situation sounds like a combination of
9/11 and Charlottesville. But if someone can prove that the alleged cop-killing was actually
a media hoax, maybe average Americans would become suspicious about other elements of the
official story, and deflect some of these plans.
I think Glenn Greenwald would be glad to blast it out, and he has a large public
platform:
"... It's all been clearly coordinated. The Deep State and big business and the media working together. Police are instructed to create unrest on Capitol Hill, allow "rioters" into the building. The media report it as an "attempted coup", while the social networks remove all of Trump's denunciations so he can be blamed for "inciting violence". ..."
"... They created the lie. They spread the lie. They silenced anyone who would dare say that this is the lie. They have, as Karl Rove would put it, "created reality", and now we're here analyzing it. ..."
"... The precedent has been created. They can ban anyone they want and make up the reasons later. ..."
"... The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater. ..."
"... As Trump was on his way out of the door, they chose to make it very clear to him who was actually in charge. Which has broader benefits, of course. Occasionally, concentration camp guards would shoot somebody entirely at random. ..."
"... They are now busily reinforcing and imposing tyrannical corporate dictatorship by destroying the rights, freedom of speech and reputations of anyone still brave enough to oppose them. The last great stronghold of democracy, the proles' only way of ever removing corrupt and failed leaders peacefully, has fallen under their full control. ..."
"... Biden is blatantly a senile puppet president approved and selected by the elites, then elected by fraud rather than by the American people. The leftists who laboured so hard to save us from Orange Man Bad have only saved the corrupt power system exploiting us all. ..."
It's all been clearly coordinated. The Deep State and big business and the media working
together. Police are instructed to create unrest on Capitol Hill, allow "rioters" into the
building. The media report it as an "attempted coup", while the social networks remove all of
Trump's denunciations so he can be blamed for "inciting violence".
They created the lie. They spread the lie. They silenced anyone who would dare say that this is the lie.
They have, as Karl Rove would put it, "created reality", and now we're here analyzing it.
It was a big lie, this time, because it had to be. Because the man – or rather the
office – was big. But for Joe Blo it can be a small lie. "He posted child porn"
or "He was spreading hate" or "He was denying the pandemic" .
The precedent has been created. They can ban anyone they want and make up the reasons
later.
The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion.
At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down
the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of
the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.
Well, we've been shown the wall, and we're being encouraged to cheer because the first
person to run into it was Donald Trump. Rather predictably, millions have fallen for it.
Emily Durron , Jan 16, 2021 8:48 PM
As Trump was on his way out of the door, they chose to make it very clear to him who was
actually in charge. Which has broader benefits, of course. Occasionally, concentration camp
guards would shoot somebody entirely at random. The reason? "Pour encourager les autres".
Politicians and hopeful politicians have been served notice to stay on the reservation. And
that's that. No more aberrations will be allowed.
Thomas Tschoepke , Jan 16, 2021 2:30 PM
Watch the movie "Wag the Dog" and it would be enough
I_left_the_left , Jan 17, 2021 1:44 PM
Leftists and ex-leftists like me have long hated and opposed 'the system', especially the
US state and its long, bloody record of corruption and military intervention for the benefit
of the military-industrial complex, not for the American workers forced to fund the US state,
and who naively offered their sons to die in the endless foreign wars the witless politicians
approved. But the system tricked the hugely influential leftist movement into thinking Trump
embodied the US system they hated, rather than threaten it. Blinded by mass-manufactured
hate, leftists just couldn't and still can't see that Trump, the DC outsider and the greatest
anti-politician of our time, was their key ally and asset against the corrupt system and
mega-rich political class Trump famously called 'the swamp', and which Americans elected him
to drain. The tragedy is that leftist hysteria and hate have been fundamental to ruining
Trump's epic rescue mission for US democracy, and for ensuring the survival of the political
elites and big tech corporate power we all hate.
They are now busily reinforcing and imposing tyrannical corporate dictatorship by
destroying the rights, freedom of speech and reputations of anyone still brave enough to
oppose them. The last great stronghold of democracy, the proles' only way of ever removing
corrupt and failed leaders peacefully, has fallen under their full control.
Biden is blatantly a senile puppet president approved and selected by the elites, then
elected by fraud rather than by the American people. The leftists who laboured so hard to
save us from Orange Man Bad have only saved the corrupt power system exploiting us all.
McConnell shared the following proposed pre-trial timeline with the Republican Conference
today:
When the articles arrive, the House Managers would exhibit (read) the articles to the
Senate, Senators would be sworn in the Members as the Court of Impeachment, and would issue a
summons to former President Trump. While we do not know what day the Managers will choose,
Leader McConnell has asked for this to occur on Thursday, January 28.
Former President Trump would have one week from that day to answer the articles of
impeachment (February 4). The House's pre-trial brief would also be due then.
The President would then have one week from the day he submits his answer to submit his
pre-trial brief (February 11). That means former president Trump has fourteen total days from
when we issue the summons to write his pre-trial brief. The House would also submit its
replication on this date.
The House would then have two days to submit their rebuttal pre-trial brief (February
13).
This approach tracks the structure of the Clinton and Trump pre-trial processes.
The periods between due dates are longer than in 1999 or 2020, but this is necessary
because of the House's unprecedented timeline.
Donald Trump is gone. No storm broke. No reckoning came. There was no plan. In his place, a
career politician assumed the presidency. Joe Biden muttered some platitudes. Most people have
already forgotten them, probably including Joe Biden.
We're told the inauguration was historic and dramatic. It was banal and boring. It
celebrated mediocrity. It had about as much dignity as getting your driver's license -- which
has more personal meaning.
Everyone has strong opinions about President Donald Trump . It's hard to feel anything about
President Joe Biden. Few attended his rallies or watched them online. He ran a modern-day
front-porch campaign, as media and tech companies censored the opposition. He was a prop, a
spectator to his own march to power.
The election was a referendum on President Trump. Many believe the election was stolen. You
may be one of them, and you may be right. Some politicians and journalists accuse President
Trump of attempting a coup, and they may even believe it.
Mr. Trump told his supporters to be patriotic and peaceful. The media have certainly
soft-peddled that. But he didn't march with his people to the Capitol. He went home. What was
supposed to happen? His supporters didn't know. I don't think President Trump knew. What did
Ashli Babbitt die for? Now, we can ask the same question about the entire Trump
administration.
Maybe you still believe in President Trump. You say his allies betrayed him. You say he
turned his back on a life of luxury that men dream of in order to save his country.
His supposed friends -- from Michael Cohen to Anthony Scaramucci -- turned on him, flaunting
their dishonor as heroism. Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and other Republicans were happy to use
President Trump when they needed him, but once his usefulness ended, they dumped him. They tell
us the president of the United States is the most powerful man in the world. Today, he can't
even send a tweet.
Perhaps you are less charitable. You may think President Trump betrayed you. You followed
him to the end, even beyond the end. He gave Kim Kardashian more support than he gave
you. The people who put their bodies on the line for him won't get a pardon, but Jared
Kushner's father did.
When our rulers say "our democracy," they mean the Regime that governs us. Whoever they are
referring to when they say those words, it doesn't include us.
The fact remains that if President Trump had told people to march on Washington, they
would have. After years of failure, pandering, betrayal, and weakness, they still were willing
to face armed men in his name. One died for him.
President Biden took his oath guarded by troops that he doesn't trust. The FBI vetted every
one of those 25,000 men to make sure they weren't "white supremacists." The people who tell us
walls don't work surrounded themselves with walls and barbed wire. Federal agents who let
cities burn all summer are now arresting and humiliating those who had dared trespass in the
"temple of democracy."
Government, oligarchs, and billionaires ruin the lives of the people they don't like while
progressives cheer. Leaders of NGOs rage because teenagers can host podcasts and post on 4chan.
CNN wants to shut down dissidents on YouTube because more people watch livestreams than watch
their darling Brian Stelter.
Journalists who encouraged riots that left dozens dead tell us we have to stop
misinformation. Regime media and its politicians want a " domestic terrorism
" law that would stifle Trump supporters. The Daily Beast wants
secret police . Journalists have been joined by volunteer commissars to hunt down
co-workers, friends, and family who attended the January 6 rally.
Regime media use words like "traitor," "sedition," and "insurrectionist." The sentence for
treason is death. Do they want to kill people?
But what did President Trump actually do as President? Not much. In 2016, after the most
remarkable, unlikely, and miraculous campaign in American history, President Trump governed
like a normal Republican. He did not deport illegals, make English the official language, or
tax remittances to Mexico. He did not abolish birth-right citizenship. He was not a "white
nationalist." He did not even eliminate race-based discrimination against whites and
Asians.
President Trump was softer on crime than Bill Clinton. He was weaker on riots than George
H.W. Bush. President Trump is leaving office not because he was strong, but because he was
weak. He did not defy the "Swamp." He couldn't defy his son-in-law.
The "new" president is a man who was a political relic even when he was Barack Obama's vice
president. If 2016 was the "Flight 93" Election, we successfully stormed the cockpit and then
pushed the control stick straight down. But let's give Donald Trump credit: Whether he meant to
or not, he did something no other politician, activist, or artist ever could. He forced the
Regime and its servants to reveal themselves.
Where do you fit here if you are not a Trump supporter, but despise Biden and all he and
his players represent? Can we have a dissident movement that has nothing to do with Trump?
Nothing to do with Republicans? Chabad-Lubavitch has absolutely no relevance to my world
view, nor the view of anyone I've encountered during my lifetime.
Trump is done and I'm actually hoping he's prosecuted on some bogus charge, simply because
he was an incompetent leader, turning his leadership responsibilities over to Jared Kushner.
It was horrible. Drag him off to a prison in the Golan heights. No one cares. A moron could
have had a clue of the blindingly obvious election fraud plans to unseat him.
I'm certain there are very bad times ahead. A long "dark winter" as this senile senate
puppet is fond of repeating. American citizens, those who work, raise families and produce
goods and services, should not be subject to the punishment ahead that will enrich and
further empower people like Biden and his horrific son, Hunter.
Truth be told, I was not a Trump supporter in the sense that I did not vote for him. I
decided to refrain from voting after Bush the Younger for whom I voted. I came to this
decision after realizing he was probably the worst president during my lifetime. I also came
to the conclusion that there is no fundamental difference between the two political parties.
They both lie, cheat, steal, and murder to maintain power.
I enjoyed Trump's election mainly for the disruptive effect it had on politics. I never
believed he would do any of the things he said he would. If he had even tried to do some of
those things he most likely would have been killed. The author of this article nails it when
he writes:
" But what did President Trump actually do as President? Not much. In 2016, after the
most remarkable, unlikely, and miraculous campaign in American history, President Trump
governed like a normal Republican. He did not deport illegals, make English the official
language, or tax remittances to Mexico. He did not abolish birth-right citizenship. He was
not a 'white nationalist.' He did not even eliminate race-based discrimination against whites
and Asians ."
Thanks for the analysis and conclusions. If my hope was dependent on political outcomes I
would have done the warm bath and razor blade bit long ago. I've deliberately avoided much
network and cable news for the most part. My hope and trust are in the One who made and
sustains all things.
I don't believe, now, that Trump & Q were ever on our side. I mean fuck him. Q
definitely was a part of Trumps team. I have no doubt of that and Q said over and over they
have everything and then, they did nothing. They passed up every chance to set things right
or even try while all the time telling us,"it's going to happen now". If you block out "hope"
and "wishful thinking" then all the facts point towards him being one of them. We've been
had.
It's better to admit this and swallow your pride than to believe in more nonsense. It's
very depressing to be shit on like this but it's even more fucked up to be shit on and then
keep making excuses for those that shit on us. "Oh well maybe he ate something that upset his
stomach so he shit on me". "Maybe he had a virus so he shit on me". "Maybe he was nervous so
he shit on me".
I don't care what his excuse is, he shit on me and my country.
Look at who Trump pardoned.
"Trump Pardons Sholam Weiss, Criminal Mastermind Behind 'The Largest Life Insurance Fraud
In U.S. History'"
Regarding (1), Netanyahu certainly displayed HIS gratitude toward Trump–fawning over
The Pretender-Select on Nov. 4, with the election (seemingly) still in doubt.
American electorial politics has been meaningless at the national level for a very long
time. I have found it interesting/entertaining never the less. Not any more. I have no
interest and nothing to say about the next election.
...His entire presidency was just one big show... The reason he never fulfilled any of his
promises was because they were all lies for the useful idiots stupid enough not to see what
he truly was. ...this was really just more demoralization and gas lighting.
Take as an example his "march on the capitol" that he cowardly declined to lead,
despite his promises. Not only did he set up any followers stupid enough to enter the capitol
for prosecution for trespassing, but he set all his "followers" up for persecution as
insurrectionists, white supremacists, and racists.
... Then to cap it all off, he doesn't even pardon Julian Assange, the man who got
him into office in the first place. Trump is and always will be nothing but a selfish
douchebag masonic brother.
The society the left is creating can't sustain itself. They appear to be trying to build a
modern day colonial empire out of an established country. Setting up different tribes against
each other, in this case blacks, Hispanics, Whites and Asians, giving power to the weakest
group, the black, so they are completely dependent on the regime. The Romans did it in every
nation they conquered. I think they're making a horrible mistake that will end in Mau Mau
style violence but they can't seem to stop themselves. We have to survive to secure the
future of our children through education and hard work. The Irish survived as a people after
hundreds of years under an occupied power, as did the Greeks and the Slavs, we can do it,
too.
As it was once portrayed in some movie what the Russians thought they were getting when it
was marketed as "workers owning the means of production" and assorted other claims that were
made is not at all what they wound up with. Then they were either murdered or went on to lead
miserable lives. "They pretend to pay us and we pretend to work". "The promises of Socialism
are as of yet unfulfilled".
The people that don't seem to mind the USA turning in to the Union of Socialist States are
going to have the same moment of discovery; what they thought they were getting and what they
wind up with will be two different things.
Trump's demise was having his weird Zionist son in law and his ditzy daughter wield so
much power. He became a vassal of the Zionists and couldn't even pardon Assange on his last
day in office.
Karl Marx may have gotten the solution all wrong, but he did diagnose the problem: this is
about class war...
... Western elites are looting their nations and crushing the working class, and they need
to deflect attention away from themselves. Teach the non-white working class to hate the
white working class, and the working class will tear itself apart.
Nothing personal, it's just business.
Funny isn't it, the United States is run by about 600 mostly white billionaires, but
somehow none of these people have any 'white privilege.' It's only working class whites
driving pick up trucks and drowning in debt and one paycheck away from being evicted that are
'privileged'.
The article provokes thoughts for the clueless to ponder after the fact. Suddenly it all
makes "sense" long after it makes any difference. Trump is a businessman turned politician
and anyone who thinks he had their best interests in mind is a hopeless fool. After his
supporters served their purpose they were trash. Trump floated away to his gold plated digs
and his followers to their trailer parks.
But what did President Trump actually do as President? Not much.
I'd say, despite his stupidity and ineptness (or maybe because of it), Trump achieved two
good things.
1. He was the first American president in a long time who did not start a single war. Not
for the lack of trying. The shelling of Syria under false pretenses and mafia-style murder of
Soleimani were acts of war by any definition. The only reason no war broke out was that
Syrian and Iranian leadership proved themselves to be ~100 times wiser than American and
Israeli elites. BTW, this was not a huge achievement, considering how degenerate those elites
are.
2.
He forced the Regime and its servants to reveal themselves.
That may be his biggest achievement. Deep sate had to show its ugly mug several times
already, first with massive eleventh-hour election fraud, second with totally unlawful
actions of the courts, third with vicious smear campaign against everyone who did not pretend
to buy its lies and shenanigans, and fourth with occupied country-style inauguration:
thousands of soldiers and no people. Whoever still believes in "American democracy" should
buy a bridge from me.
Mussolini's invasion of Ethiopia is what caused my grandparents to leave Italy for
good.
(PS Migrating from one's homeland exacts an enormous toll. My parents would be 100 this year,
& long dead; I only began to understand the turmoil they endured, with grace and dignity,
after they were no longer around to talk about it.)
Oct 29, 2020 Robert O'Brien – Trump's Foreign Policy
Donald Trump is the first American president since Ronald Reagan not to initiate a foreign
war. Moreover, peace is breaking out in the Middle East. National Security Advisor Robert
O'Brien explains the Trump approach.
"When the student is ready, the teacher will appear."
Which means that when a deserving people find themselves in distress, a leader worthy of
their loyalty and respect will appear to lead them – but not before.
That's an unwarranted generalization. Yes, the Empire and its Western European bootlickers
are going down the drain due to their own actions. Most of the world would say "good
riddance".
But white people also live in Russia and Eastern Europe. Most of them are not as dumb as
Ukrainian "patriots".
Bottom line: normal white people will survive, cucked white people will not. Survival of the
fittest in action.
@Anon ntury
version), and if they keep not minding, they are going to more or less get it again.
Not a chance in hell. People, why don't you stop talking about things you know nothing
about?
What ever problems the Soviet Union had – and many of them curtesy of the West –
it did have equality of the nations and races and, in many ways, economic equality as well. This
is something American can only dream about now, let alone in the future. The Soviet period was
also the time of great achievements in education and culture, which post-soviet Russia is yet to
reach, and that is something that cannot be said of today's America. Carroll
Price , says: January 21, 2021
at 8:01 pm GMT • 6.0 hours ago
For awhile I believed the election was stolen, until taking a look at my own large extended
family consisting of several dozen guilt-ridden, propaganderized nephews, neices, and in-laws
etc who nearly all voted for Joe Biden.
Whites are privileged because they have disproportionate power and wealth, but if you
notice that the most disproportionately powerful and wealthy are Jews, that's
antisemitism.
Which, tbh would not bother me much if they used that power to further America's interests
or at least not at America's expense, and if they earned it through actually being better
rather than simply being able to get away with nepotism and tribalism by playing the Holocaust
card.
@Carolyn
Yeager o actually rule the US and most of the world. Assorted international financiers,
also know as banksters, many of them (((small hats))), are the ones who are pulling the
strings. The president is essentially a puppet, who does the bidding of the aforementioned
group. Trump did quite well in stirring up the ire of the unhinged libtards while throwing a
bone to the so called conservatives, but he is a false alternative to the uniparty system. He
is owned by the same Juden banksters as Biden, Obama, and Bush. It is pathetic how you resort
to personal attacks on the author since you have naught but strawman arguments. The last
president who actually was a threat to the powers that be was JFK, and he was JFK-ed. You
should realize that their will be no positive change from within the system.
The Congress and Executive Branch really were the two most important power-network nodes
of civilization control when our country started out as a European-heritage
Christian-heritage republic. Most power was diffuse and local, as befits a genuine
republic.
Now federal institutions are secondary nodes. They dance on the puppets strings wielded by
the hands that own the primary nodes: the manufacture of fiat currency and the financial
system into which it is injected and then used to manage non-financial institutions and the
personnel who staff them. This runs the range from lucrative DoD contracts for Amazon Web
Services to little bags of money for Little Marco Rubio.
The transnational financialists (globalists), who own and operate what used to be OUR
country, control access to the institutions (primarily Congress) which have the power to make
changes to the structure of civilization (immigration, trade, welfare dependence). Dem and
Rep parties are privately owned corporations and the set of people who are their overlapping
primary shareholders is a small one.
Antifa attacks on institutions of the corporate left suggest that the globalists do not
have mass support from either the left or the right. The young left are not on board with the
globalist Great Reset. They have their own vision for a reset, as do we on the civilizational
right. The globalists are like the Weimar Republic. Most people want it gone, but disagree
over with what to replace it.
TLDR: Antifa attacks suggest that the globalists making architectural decisions for OUR
civilization do not have mass support. They have obedient gun-carriers in the forces of order
who are still operating on institutional loyalty inertia and fear of what may come to
pass.
I noticed that in some of the units, none of the enlisted men, (those in ranks) had all of
their backs turned to the motorcade. I also could not see any rifles at their side. It's
likely, in my estimation, that their commands did not want any loose cannon, or otherwise, to
take a shot, notwithstanding the fact that a 5.56mm round will not penetrate the carriages of
the new king and his retinue.
Look at what happened to the Brown Shirts. Same thing will happen to Antifa if they keep
this up. In addition, the Left/Progressives who supported Biden will be thrown under the bus
within a week if they haven't been already. They will be mightily disillusioned.
How do I know this? I believed Obama's hopey changy stuff before his first election. I
even sent him a donation. He discarded us within hours of his election. Decided he would do
nothing about torture. Not even a "thank you" email.
I am saddened by the state of our country. However, it seems to me, we haven't hit bottom
yet. When that happens, we get to watch all the left-wing lunatics (metaphorically I hope)
eat each other like the true zombies they are.
I feel very sorry for those Republicans who are in large metropolitan areas with so many
swarms of army ant-like lefties who haven't yet figured out how to get and keep employment
and so have nothing to do but take Soros money to continue their careers as rioters or Antifa
goons.
Out here in the West, I'm just holding my breath and waiting for them to come here and try
to force us to join their army.
This is farming country and we have deadly chemicals for countering insect
infestations.
The sad thing is that because often our cost of living is cheaper, we are constantly
getting some of the wealthier Lefties buying up our land.
It reminds me of the range wars in the Old West. I sure hope the ranchers and and the
farmers have settled their differences and will work together to keep the Eastern crowd, the
Californian idiots, and the Boulder Marxists away.
I still pray that some day we can draw a boundary around the Boulder area, and let them
try to govern themselves only while keeping them out of our state politics--and especially
out of the governor's mansion after our current governor and his "first gentleman" are
finally gone.
You can be a constitutional republic as long as voters are engaged and infomed. You become
a banana republic when governance is farmed out to surrogate forces, whose only goal is
carving up the now mandatory the government cash resources.
When did the Founders version of America take the wrong turn? Perhaps it was the income
tax amendment - free flow of money for special interests to carve up, instead of our "elected
representatives" actually earning our tax dollars and being personally accountable for how
they were spent.
What government institutions that now work against us, got their start and their now
immortal life, only after this nation ratified the the income tax amendment?
Our only defense now is economic warfare - starve the bastards. Is there even a plan to
make this a viable and influential choice?
BTW: "term limits" is not the answer. Only makes voters even lazier and elected official
even more unaccountable, with the very serious downside that real problems get kicked down
the road for some other "term" to solve -- which is never.
The "new GOP" needs to explore the 16th Amendment, and explore it hard: new GOP litmus
test - do you support over-turning the 16th Amendment?
The Sixteenth Amendment (Amendment XVI) to the United States Constitution allows
Congress to levy an income tax without apportioning it among the states on the basis of
population.
It was passed by Congress in 1909 in response to the 1895 Supreme Court case of Pollock
v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. The Sixteenth Amendment was ratified by the requisite number
of states on February 3, 1913, and effectively overruled the Supreme Court's ruling in
Pollock.
IMO, the left-right frame and the partisan frame while convenient does not really point to
the fault lines. I believe the better frames are one, by class - oligarchy + urban
media-managerial class vs working + middle class; and second by belief system - government as
tool to "right inequalities" vs individual liberty + competitive markets, implying government
to enforce fair rules of the game uniformly like a referee in a sports game with reasonably
evenly matched teams.
While the authors of this paper may be classified as from the "left" and automatically
dismissed by the "right", they make many important points for consideration by both the
"left" and "right".
Bill Clinton & Obama were labeled "marxist" by most of the "right" but they actually
did nothing "marxist" in a classical sense. However, they did further the symbiotic
relationship between Big Government & Big Business to further strengthen the Party of
Davos from both an economic & political power perspective. That would rightly be labeled
"fascist". The policies of Reagan & the Bush presidents were really not that different to
further enhance the stranglehold of power by the same group as was Trump's presidency. As
Col. Lang labeled it, we have a "mono-party" in reality. So partisan fervor is misplaced and
a distraction from the real fight. In this context, Trump was a weak leader. While he got the
zeitgeist correct and rode it to the presidency, from the first day on he not only acquiesced
to the demands of the Swamp/Deep State but he also hired them to run his administration.
I am disgusted by all that Antifa or whoever these people are manage to get away with.
For over a week every day in the news there's been articles about the identity of rioters
at the Capitol and their arrests. Why don't more of THESE rioters get arrested for property
damage and risky behavior like lighting fires and hitting people? When there are arrests, why
aren't their mugshots, names and locations revealed? After so much time these mysterious
rioters are still doing whatever they want, wherever they want. Even mayors complain but
nothing gets done. It is high time these people are arrested and revealed.
Aren't they domestic terrorists? If they are, they should be treated that way.
Thanks. Now that's the spirit. After insulting the Guardsmen with the "vetting", this
should be an eye-opening statement to Slow Joe (more likely to his handlers) about what The
Deplorables in the ranks think about that, and furthermore perhaps about his "victory".
A message was sent, but was the message received, and not merely received, but actually
understood? After all, it should be recalled,that there are none so blind, as those who would
not see. Arrogance and condescension make for blinkered vision, and Lord knows, we are
dealing with some people who exhibit world-class arrogance as well as condescension here.
while I don't believe in the existence of US domestic terrorists, I do believe that millions
of US citizens are convinced that the vote was stolen. These people are understandably
disgusted and angry. Many might be desperate or even despondent. Let's call them the
"deplorables" and consider it a badge of honor. Well, these deporables won't take DC by force,
but they will never trust a Dem or GOP politician again, and neither will they ever trust the
corporate media. One of the blessings in disguise of this stolen election is that the GOP and
Fox News have shown their true faces, and their faces are evil, stupid and ugly. 4 years ago
millions of US citizens did not so much vote for Trump as much as they voted against Hillary
whom they (correctly) saw as a symbol and metaphor for the entire "deep state", or "swamp" or
"ZOG" or whatever other expression you prefer.
These deplorables first trusted Obama ("change we can believe in") and, later, Trump
(MAGA). Now they know that both sides are equally evil and false.
In the past, both factions of the Big Money Party had safety valves (Tea Party, Occupy
Wall Street, Rand Paul, Tulsi Gabbard, Bernie Sanders, etc.). I think that now the two parties
are literally standing naked and boy is that an ugly sight!
Third, and this point I primarily address to my readers in the USA and that will force me to
make a sidebar primarily directed at them:
[Sidebar: the planet can be divided into 2 rough parts: ZONE A full controlled by the
AngloZionist Empire and, ZONE B, which includes everybody else. The vast majority of Americans
are only really aware of Zone A. Why? For the following reasons:
and speaking
Spanish knows that totally false this belief is, of course. But few non-Hispanic Americans
ever speak in Spanish to the Hispanics in the USA (FYI – I do). Anglos generally seem
to have a hard time with languages Sadly, most Americans are not educated by their parents,
their religious leaders, their communities, or their schools. Most Americans get most of
their education from watching TV. Since all the US TV channels offer almost the exact same
mix of vulgar entertainment, propaganda and commercials, this "education" resulted in a huge
amount of massively dysfunctional families and communities. This addiction to a flickering
screen (be it the Idiot Tube or You Tube – same difference) gives them a very short
attention span and a limited ability to process large amounts of written information, which
is what is needed to be able to analyze a situation]
As a direct consequence of these factors, most Americans live in a "mental space" where Zone
B simply does not exist, and when it is mentioned, it is invariable in the "same old
clichés" mode.
Finally, considering all of the above, it is truly a miracle that the deplorables completely
ignored a massive brainwashing campaign (waaaay worse than anything the Commies or the Nazis
ever came up with!) against "Trump the New Hitler" and still voted for him twice, both in 2016
and 2020! It really goes to show that most Americans quietly but passionately hate the regime
in DC and that they use every opportunity they get to at least to try to change their country
and their lives by means of voting. Makes you wonder what these "disobedient" deplorables will
do the next time around now that voting became clearly a waste of time, don't it?]
Now here is the good news: Zone B does exist! In fact, it is huge, rich, truly diverse and
it has long figured out that both the AngloZionist Empire and even the USA as we knew them have
basically died, all that's left from it is some residual momentum and many bad habits by
ignorant, arrogant and delusional US politicians.
Why is that so important?
Because if we allow the Great Satan (actually a very good and exact expression, I think that
it fits the new regime perfectly, I will use it more often) to convince us that reality is all
contained in Zone A, we could really fall into despair. Yeah, the USA is screwed, and so is all
of the EU. As for US colonies like AUS or NZ, not only are they screwed (say by siding with the
USA against a much, MUCH more powerful China), they also seem to have a morbid desire to
outstupid even the USA in terms of crazy laws and insane ideological positions (say on COVID,
for example). But all this in ONLY true inside Zone A. Very few people in Zone B still believe
that the USA matters a great deal. Most of them already know otherwise, even if this is never
reported by Zone A media.
There is even more good news: neither the (rump) AngloZionist Empire nor the (rump) USA
represent any credible threat to most countries in Zone B . Oh sure, US politicians can call
Russia a "gas station masquerading as a country" or a "regional power", the truth is that the
united West has completely failed to break, or even meaningfully hurt Russia, despite 46
sanction packages (that's just by Trump, not counting the "change we can believe in" crook).
Heck, even COVID only marginally hurt Russia (which, unlike the flag-waving pseudo-patriotic
crap spewed by western politicians took COVID seriously, very seriously in fact, as early as
March and prepared the country for no less than two major outbreaks, both which happened, and
both which Russia successfully dealt with; this is why the EU is now in full COVID-hysteria
mode, while Russia does not bother to impose any lockdowns at all!).
Now let's place two US propaganda items side by side and take a look, ok?
The USA has the
most powerful economy on the planet. Russia is the #1 adversary of the USA (at least according
to the Dems, the GOP places China as #1 and Russia only as #2)
Do you see the problem?
If the USA is so powerful, how is it that it failed to crush Russia? What about Iran? Or,
in extremis , Venezuela? Yet, even the the last case, the "best" this supposed World
Hegemon did was send a few clueless ex-special ops to get caught and give case of hysterical
laughter to the entire Latin American continent!
And these folks want to take on China or Russia?!
Peuhleeze!
So here is the other very good news: Zone A presents no real threat to Zone B!!!
Yes, of course, the USA can still nuke China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela or some other country.
But let's look at the consequences of such a strike:
comprador regime in Bogota will not
survive such a war and Colombia will also "fall". Against any other Zone B country: the US
successfully nukes this/these country/countries only to find itself being treated like a
pariah by the entire planet (including quite a few US colonies), including the real military
powers. NATO and the EU will also collapse is that happens (the US being their cornerstone).
The bottom line is that while the US triad is still fully functional and capable of waging a
full-scale nuclear war against any adversary (including Russia and, even more so, China), the
truth is that all this triad really achieves is making it impossible for another nuclear power
to use nukes against the USA. Which is not minor or irrelevant, the problem here being that the
US nuclear triad provides with with exactly zero help when trying to deal with any adversary
not using nukes (either because this adversary choose not to use nukes due to the effective
deterrence of the US nuclear triad or simply because it has no nukes in the first place).
As I have mentioned in the past, the US submarine force is, along with the nuclear triad,
the other truly effective and powerful force which the US can count on in case of war. However,
other than launching large numbers of outdated and, therefore, easily countered cruise missiles
there is little this force can do to assist a US ground (or, for that matter) air operation
against anything but a very weak adversary. The problem with so-called "sub-peer" adversaries
is that they have relatively few lucrative targets to strike with cruise missiles (think
Venezuela here). Most of these subpeer adversaries do not have the air defenses needed to deal
with any halfway determined US missile and bomb attack and the US can quickly destroy whatever
air defenses such "sub-peer" countries have. So yes, I admit it. If tomorrow the USA wants a
"short and triumphant war", say to boost morale or distract from internal problems, they could
still attack countries like, say, Antigua and Barbuda or Santa Lucia, but such a farce will
hardly would qualify as "brilliant victory" of the "best armed forces in the galaxy", now would
it? Or maybe would, who knows? Ff the united propaganda machine wants to present that as a
triumph for US forces, like they did with the Grenada invasion (one of the worst military
operation in history!) they can do that, of course. But that would only serve to further
ridicule that propaganda machine since 2021 is not 1983, there are now millions of deplorables
out there who will never buy this kind of silly nonsense.
Besides, considering how the joint efforts of the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia (the
"Axis of Kindness") completely failed to deal with the Houthis, my money would not be on any US
invasion force in the Caribbean (with the possible exception of a re-invasion of Haiti or the
Dominican Republic, but these are already US protectorates, what would be the point?!).
Why does all that matter so much?
Because the Dems are clearly up to no good. Next, not only will we see a wave of repression
against free speech internally, but the Dems are already making noises about, you guessed it,
China and Russia (again!) and, when that inevitably yield exactly zero results, they will turn
to "hate on" Iran and Venezuela again. But even these comparatively weaker countries are now
very much capable of making Uncle Shmuel pay an immense price in blood and hell to pay in terms
of political blowback on to many fronts to count.
The "power" of a nation (or a coalition of nations) can be measured using very many
different type of metrics, but the three most common ones would probably be: economic power,
military power and political power. If we use those three to compare Zone A to Zone B, it would
be reasonable to posit the following:
people worldwide have
long switched their support for Zone B countries. The recent triumph of the people of Bolivia
over their oppressors is a very telling sign of this trend.
And here is the key factor to keep in mind: there is nothing, absolutely nothing, the
Biden/Harris Admin can do to change these trends. It is simply too late and when the initiation
of the internal collapse of the USA, these trends will only accelerate .
Yes, the bad guys did win, but only over Trump and his clueless pseudo-allies (did they
betray him faster than he betrayed them, or was it the other way around?), but they only won
one a battle against the deplorables and they have won exactly nothing against Zone B.
The Dems are now busy with vengeance in all its forms. They also relish in humiliating Trump
and those who dared to support him. This is the political equivalent of torturing people in
basements, not winning glorious battles. But they don't realize that, they are too vain, too
ideologically hateful, and too cowardly to understand that.
Still, brainwashing, like torture (including mental torture!), is real. In this case, this
is a battle for the minds of the deplorables who now have to be beaten down into a catatonic
state of total submission and compliance. The Dems are using lies, their favorite weapon, but
their assault is real, nonetheless. And this is the battle which we, those who opposed
imperialism, have to fight – the battle for the minds of the people in Zone A: we need to
show them that the pseudo-reality of Zone A has no real existence outside the Idiot Box and the
vapid rhetoric of US decision makers.
We have to mentally prepare for a sharp increase in the amount and scope of the lies the US
propaganda machine will be telling us (if you thought the last 4 years were bad, prepare for
much, much worse; good example
here ). And, of course, expect LOTS of false flags, especially to demonstrate the reality
of the alleged danger coming from the "domestic terrorists". That will all go down against a
background of a full-spectrum attack on free speech, dissent and any form of actual (as opposed
to pretend) thought, really.
The irony is, of course, that the coming witch hunt (it will be way worse than Salem or
McCarthy) will be waged in the name of diversity and ostensibly against "hate". In reality, of
course, what the regime wants is to crush real diversity because the leaders of the US
Nomenklatura absolutely hate everything besides their sorry selves. Like all ideologues,
what these folks want is 1) total power and 2) total uniformity. All those rejecting these
modern dogmas will be branded has criminals, terrorists, heretics, racist and, of course,
Russian and Chinese agents.
And that is why this regime will also fail.
Conclusion: diversity WILL win. The REAL diversity, of course!
Our planet is wonderfully diverse, especially outside the uniformity sector of Zone A. There
IS a Zone B out there, and the leaders of Zone A will be defeated by our real common and shared
humanity (and their hatred for us!). Somewhere between Obama and Trump, the world has moved on,
and it is now very busy dealing with the immense challenges and opportunities facing it in Zone
B. And no, neither Russia nor China is busy trying to sabotage or undermine the USA – US
leaders are doing that much better job of that than any Russian or Chinese ever could . So why
even bother (and nevermind the risks!)?
We cannot predict what will happen next, there are simply too many variables to do that. But
what we can do is predict with a great degree of confidence that the new regime in power in DC
will do no better than all the other regimes which came to power by means of color revolutions
in the past couple of decades. There is no hope left for the Empire, as for the USA, there will
be plenty of hope left for them, but only after a long and painful process of collapse and
rebirth (both of which are inevitable by now). The truth is that US is not that unique as
empires go, sorry, it is just your typical arrogant and narcissistic empire which will collapse
just as all the other arrogant and narcissistic empires in history have collapsed, mostly under
their own obscene weight . And those poor souls who sincerely believe that China (or Russia)
want to replace the USA simply don't understand that these two countries already have been
empires, it was a disaster, thank you very much, and they have no desire to repeat their past
mistakes. This desire for non-exceptionalism and normalcy will, with time, also become the
object of a large social consensus in the USA. And, with time, the USA will finally be welcomed
into a truly free Zone B or, should I say, a Zone-free world.
Look how perfectly applicable is the phase "The complaint wants the Ethics Committee to investigate whether Cruz and Hawley failed to
"[p]ut loyalty to the highest moral principles and to country above loyalty to persons, party, or Government department," to key
Russiagaters
Notable quotes:
"... they "engaged in criminal conduct, or unethical or improper behavior." ..."
"... The Democratic Senators are also asking the Ethics Committee to "offer recommendations for strong disciplinary action, including up to expulsion or censure, if warranted by the facts uncovered." ..."
"... Its as if democrats didnt spend 4 years and millions of dollars questioning the validity of the prevous election. ..."
The complaint wants the Ethics Committee to investigate whether Cruz and Hawley failed to
"[p]ut loyalty to the highest moral principles and to country above loyalty to persons, party,
or Government department," or if they engaged in "improper conduct reflecting on the Senate"
linked to the January 6 Capitol 'riot.'
The Democratic senators also outlined several questions they believed should be probed as
part of an Ethics Committee investigation including if they were in touch with coordinators
for the rally , if they encouraged any "insurrectionist" acts or if they "engaged in criminal
conduct, or unethical or improper behavior."
"While it was within Senators' rights to object to the electors, the conduct of Senators
Cruz and Hawley, and potentially others, went beyond that," they wrote in the letter to
Ethics Committee leadership.
Cruz and Hawley, two potential 2024 presidential contenders, have denounced the mob that
breached the Capitol but they've also stood by their decisions to object to the Electoral
College results from Arizona and Pennsylvania, respectively. -
The Hill
During the counting of electoral votes, Cruz objected to Arizona's results, while Hawley
objected to Pennsylvania's results following the Capitol attack, when a group of Trump
supporters and at least one prominent member of BLM breached the Capitol building and occupied
it for a brief period of time before leaving on their own.
The Democratic Senators are also asking the Ethics Committee to "offer recommendations for
strong disciplinary action, including up to expulsion or censure, if warranted by the facts
uncovered."
Forgero 3 hours ago
Its as if democrats didnt spend 4 years and millions of dollars questioning the validity
of the prevous election.
Senator Rand Paul recently challenged the new Secretary of State nominee Anthony Blinken on
his history of pushing regime change in the Middle East and North Africa:
"Regime change in the Middle East has led to chaos, instability and more terrorism," Sen.
Paul argued.
"Like Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton you've been a supporter of military intervention in
the Middle East from the Iraq war to the Libyan war to the Syrian civil war..." he introduced
in his Tuesday questoning of Blinken.
Sen. Paul began his argument by questioning Blinken's role in the NATO intervention of Libya
in 2001 and his support for the US military invasion of Iraq in 2003, which the Kentucky
congressman said was a major disaster that paved the way for a stronger Iran.
The congressman argued that Blinken continued to push regime change in Syria, which he said
was a significant blunder, especially with the amount of money spent training "moderate rebel
forces" .
Sen. Paul said the administration of former President Barack Obama spent $250 million (USD)
on training 60 rebels [as part of the DoD side; the CIA program was much more expansive], which
he said was a waste of money.
He would go on to question why Blinken would support the Syrian opposition groups on the
ground, as he pointed out the most powerful fighters are those from the jihadist groups like
the Al-Nusra Front .
"Even after Libya you guys went on to Syria wanting to do the same thing again... it's a
disaster. The lesson of these wars is that regime change doesn't work!" Paul said.
"You got rid of one 'bad guy' and another 'bad guy' got stronger," Paul added while
lambasting the US strategy of going after Iran while Iraq is still weakened by Bush's regime
change war there.
"Maybe we shouldn't be 'choosing' governments in the Middle East," Paul continued.
Blinken claimed in response that he wasn't supportive of a full-scale 'Iraq-style' regime
change war in Syria while vaguely claiming that he's done "deep thinking" and reflection on the
issue . Blinken never repudiated the policy of regime change in the Middle East, however.
Sen. Paul then shifted his attention to NATO, which he said Blinken was trying to strengthen
for the purpose of combatting Russia. The senator said Blinken's policy on NATO would lead to
war with Russia, which the latter responded would have the opposite effect.
Paul concluded by saying that regime change needs to end because it is involving the US in
long wars that are costly to the military.
The Luftwaffe 8 hours ago
We will see a new major war started by this administration within two years
Cloud9.5 7 hours ago
We have to do something to reduce the population.
Leather-Dog 7 hours ago
You mean in addition to the 103.5% effective covid vaccine?
RiverRoad 7 hours ago
On duckduckgo.com search > "Med
Cram".
On You Tube: Dr. Seheult's med school video lecture "Vitamin D and Covid 19: The Evidence for
Prevention and " (5.3m views)
Vitamin D3 is sold over the counter.
Karma is coming for Covid.
eatapeach 7 hours ago
Hopefully it's also coming for the thieving liars who pushed this cheap PsyOp (Pompeo is
one, Fauci is another).
bigjim 3 hours ago
I guess Bibi mis-spelled Rand's email address on the memo.
boattrash 2 hours ago
103.5%... that sounds like the voter turnout in all the blue cities.
rastanarchocapitalist 7 hours ago
If one could take all the people in the world and cram them into a city as dense as Tokyo,
it would cover the area of Rhode Island.
BaNNeD oN THe RuN 5 hours ago
BS
Tokyo pop density=16121.8 /sq.mi.
Rhode Island = 1045 sq.mi.
At that density RI would hold 16.8 million people.
At the average annual population growth rate of the last century there will be 1 sq.m. of
land per person in only 750 years. That includes all mountains, frozen tundra, jungles and
deserts... now "get off my lawn".
bearwinkle 6 hours ago
Sure, that's why Xiden is allowing millions of immigrants to invade our borders.
aloha_snakbar 7 hours ago
I thought it might be like today...
Hatterasjohn 7 hours ago
Anyone crazy enough to join ,or be in the military , is out of his friggin mind.
BarnacleBill 7 hours ago
Or likes killing civilians. Don't overlook the psychopaths.
headslapper 7 hours ago
and that will be the end of the US.
RiverRoad 7 hours ago
How about the Regime Change just effected right HERE in the good old USA?
Im1ru12 4 hours ago
Exactly - "Maybe we shouldn't be 'choosing' governments in the Middle East," Paul
continued
That's what they do - they just did it here
starman99 7 hours ago
(((Anthony Blinken)))
USAllDay 7 hours ago
I'd take Assad over Biden.
9.1ontherichterscale 7 hours ago (Edited)
Assad has more integrity in his shoe than Biden has accumulated in the past 50 years.
Armed Resistance 7 hours ago
If the deep state hates Assad, then I know he must be legitimately a good guy deep down.
9.1ontherichterscale 7 hours ago
BINGO!
Brutlstrudl 6 hours ago
It seems that after each election, the USA becomes more of a contrarian indicator
SERReal1 7 hours ago
I agree. At least Assad puts his country first and gives the finger to the Deep State.
BaNNeD oN THe RuN 5 hours ago
Plus a secular government that respects the rights of all religious minorites. Sets a bad
example for all the intolerant apartheid states in the region.
Hopefully the "Assad Must Go" curse gets the entire Biden Administration sooner rather than
later.
aloha_snakbar 8 hours ago
Who cares...Uncle Scam lost the tiny bit of credibility he had on 01/20/2021. RIP
America....
eatapeach 7 hours ago
I care. Here's yet another Israel-first douchenozzle getting put in a very, very high
position. And acting like it'd be any different with Trump at the helm is severe folly.
(Pompeo)
FluTangClan 6 hours ago
Sorry bro but anyone with eyes hasn't thought the US credible for more than a century.
4Celts 7 hours ago
Paul concluded by saying that regime change needs to end because it is involving the US in
long wars that are costly to the military.
Pardon , but the " cost " to the military shouldn't be the top/only argument. What happened
to morally/ ethically wrong ?
SwmngwShrks 7 hours ago
"All wars are Bankers' wars." -Smedley Butler
white horse 7 hours ago
Moral is dead long ago, replaced by new fake moral called humanitarianism.
DonGenaro 7 hours ago
You're an astute observer - few detect such "tells"
Feck Weed 5 hours ago
Consider the audience
FringeDweller 5 hours ago
Fair point.
Lord JT 5 hours ago
He mentioned that it creates more terrorism, and that the incoming regime may be even worse
than the previous.
Unknown User 8 hours ago
Biden will start a war, or two, or three...
Why-Am-I-Banned 6 hours ago
Maybe the best thing that could happen to free us all finally is an all out war with
Russia, we aren't going to see a revolution to get rid of the corruption the population is
lazy and scared of doing without.
Maybe forced into mutual assured destruction is truly the only way to get rid of the deep
state...
Russia lost approx 250 million via communism over decades, maybe we need to just swallow
the poison pill and get it over with.
Not all of us will die, and definately no one is going to listen to the deep state leaders
after the dust clears...
FluTangClan 6 hours ago
Cho Bai Den fol peace!
wick7 5 hours ago
It's amazing how Democrats flipped overnight to being pro war once Obama started new wars.
They were mad when Trump was signing peace deals. Lol.
You_Cant_Quit_Me 8 hours ago
He's right. One disaster after another. Who has Assad attacked? If small countries want the
US to back off then they must develop nuclear weapons. When was the last time the US attacked a
country with nuclear capabilities?
JRobby 7 hours ago
Bust Blinken's balls until he quits like a little rat trying to naw through steel cables
gespiri 7 hours ago
The only way to stop these wars is to send the people (and their kids) who are pushing for
it in the first place to the front lines.
rastanarchocapitalist 7 hours ago
Or make the state obsolete by transitioning to a private law society.
RedDog1 7 hours ago
Remember how Gaddafi surrendered his nukeprogram to Bush, a few years later Obama/HRC
invaded...resulting in Gaddafi being lynched?
eatapeach 7 hours ago
Iran and NK and Syria remember, for sure. Wish we all remembered the USS Liberty when
shaping foreign policy.
LooseLee 4 hours ago
Remember Libya has no central bank?
Pandelis 3 hours ago (Edited)
you really believe that bs ... it is much more than that ... at the end is about the land
and the people ... money can be printed out of thin air and there is nothing libya (or iraq,
iran etc.) central bank can do about it ...
bring on dr. fraucistein to explain it all to us ... maga!!
roach clipper 6 hours ago
Assad placed his country too close to Is ra hell
manofthenorth 8 hours ago
Sorry guys but we have been played like a second hand fiddle.
I assume Paul has figured out by now that being a murderous psychopath is a job requirement
in DC. It's the first question in the job interview. "Do you enjoy death and destruction for
profit and personal power?"
littlewing 7 hours ago
Remember when Trump bombed Syria and all of a sudden everyone in DC loved him for 15
minutes.
Talk about the big reveal.
aloha_snakbar 7 hours ago
The same Rand Paul who was criticizing Trump in the eleventh hour? That one?? They are all
swamp creatures and seriously make me want to vomit...
pro·le·tar·i·at 7 hours ago
The apple rolled away from the tree.
Leather-Dog 7 hours ago
Paul, I like you, you seem to care a little bit. However, if they haven't cared in the last
forever, they are definitely not going to start now. They just regime changed ourselves with
almost no substantial resistance, you think they will care about Syria?
StanleyTheManly 5 hours ago
He puts on a show to care once in a while.
He didn't stand for the truth when it counted.
Goat of Steverino 7 hours ago
GREAT RAND, BUT WHERE WERE YOU ON BIG TECH CENSORSHIP AND ELECTION FRAUD?
Bank_sters 7 hours ago
He's cucked.
Ted Baker 6 hours ago
What is this obsession with Russia? Russia is a peaceful country who defends its people. How
difficult is that to understand?
ReadyForHillary 6 hours ago
Russia isn't down with the NWO.
Dinaric 7 hours ago
(((Blinkin))) is all you need to know.
9.1ontherichterscale 7 hours ago
Does anyone honestly believe that if Biden was honest and had any degree if integrity that
he would be president at this moment in U.S. history? That boy is a 50 year swamp critter A
thoroughly reliable member of the compromised fraternity. Same for Nancy.
freakscene 7 hours ago
Remember the video of younger Biden telling some voter that he graduated top of his class,
with honors????
None of which were true.
littlewing 7 hours ago
His degree is from University of Phoenix.
Now all colleges are that. haha
Invert This, Media Matters Monkeys 7 hours ago
Ironically, he wants to set up a comity for Integrity In Government.
freakscene 7 hours ago
Yeah. Thats hysterical!!
Saturday Night Live material - if they had any spine.
BarnacleBill 7 hours ago
Which they don't. Come on, man!
StanleyTheManly 5 hours ago
Yep. They needed someone with zero integrity.
yeketerina velikaya 7 hours ago
You know who's been right all along?
Tulsi Gabbard.
Right on big tech
Right on Kamala
Right on pardoning Assange and Snowden
Right on the uniparty and false flags in Syria
Right on Queen of Warmongers Hillary and DNC
Right on the MSM
Right on securing the elections/ballot harvesting
She's the real deal and would have delivered on these things but never had a shot.
Armed Resistance 7 hours ago
She was wrong on gun control. Very wrong! And that's a non-negotiable.
Why-Am-I-Banned 6 hours ago
Don't worry real gun control is coming and so much more you didn't ask for...
rastanarchocapitalist 7 hours ago
She should have been Trump's vp choice.
StanleyTheManly 5 hours ago
You know....I think you're right. I hadn't thought of that.
StanleyTheManly 5 hours ago
I like Tulsi. She seems like a genuine person with integrity that really cares about the
country. BUT I disagree with her on quite a few issues. Maybe she'll come around.
littlewing 7 hours ago
The steal was sealed when the Supreme Court refused to hear the Texas case.
Greasy John Roberts wrecked America.
Max21c 7 hours ago
The steal was sealed when the Supreme Court refused to hear the Texas case.
True.
Vichy John Roberts went full Quisling and brought back Jim Crow laws. The Supreme Court
endorsed election fraud, supported the coup d'etat, forced Trump from power, helped usher in a
new era for the banana republic of Jim Crow laws...
phillyla 7 hours ago
John Roberts is compromised 8 ways to Sunday. Trump should have had him impeached and
removed from the bench
El Chapo Read 7 hours ago
If you thought Trump was surrounded by Red Sea Pedestrians with an agenda, research the
ethno-religious background of Biden's cabinet picks.
Shalom!
SassyPants 7 hours ago
Every administration is. Trumps son in law and advisor is as well. Please see the entire
picture for a change.
snatchpounder PREMIUM 7 hours ago
How about closing all military bases overseas and dismantling the MIC and oh **** it an old
demented neocon is playing president for a few months, scratch that.
rastanarchocapitalist 7 hours ago
The crack up boom of the FRNs may force that one day
snatchpounder PREMIUM 7 hours ago
I think it'll happen sooner rather than later, the chances are good based on the demented
old pedophile being selected president and his retards at the fed.
rastanarchocapitalist 4 hours ago
In the long run, that might be a good thing if we return to honest money but you can be sure
they'll try to kick the can for another 50 years with some form of new fiat or erasing a couple
of zeroes of our current notes.
Hopefully the masses will just say know but I wouldn't put much faith in that.
RedNemesis 6 hours ago
Parents, do not let your smart, winning kids into the armed services. The MIC will grind
them out with PTSD, brain injuries, and lost limbs. There is no 'patriotism' or allegience to
the Deep State.
Why-Am-I-Banned 6 hours ago
Maybe the best thing that could happen to free us all finally is an all out war with Russia,
we aren't going to see a revolution to get rid of the corruption the population is lazy and
scared of doing without.
Maybe forced into mutual assured destruction is truly the only way to get rid of the deep
state...
Russia lost approx 250 million via communism over decades, maybe we need to just swallow the
poison pill and get it over with.
Not all of us will die, and definately no one is going to listen to the deep state leaders
after the dust clears...
Max21c 6 hours ago (Edited)
Maybe the best thing that could happen to free us all finally is an all out war with
Russia..
Maybe we should instead just launch a sneak attack on Alpha Centauri instead. Skip the small
fry like Russia and China. In a few generations we shall know whether our Earthling space
torpedoes hit Alpha Centauri. This of course should be debated by the people and approved by a
plebiscite per ballot referendums. Then the space war bill sent to the Earthlings Politburo for
their approval. It'll take around a decade or more to design and build the space torpedoes...
then 100 years plus for travel time and the same to get the data back from the
mothership...
Plus we can have both a Cold War and a Hot War with Alpha Centauri... under the leadership
of an Earthling appointed or elected by the Earthlings Council and elevated to the rank of Don
Quixote with the accompany title of Primal inter Pares
We just need more right thinking smart people to join the cult and become enlightened to the
prospects of a new 100 years war with other planets...and maybe some small wars with
planetoids...asteroids and comets...
We can establish of house of OverLords composed of only the best Astrologers to help pick
out which planets to attack & destroy...based upon whether they have offended our star
charts or the zodiac calls for war... In addition we can establish a lower house of UnderLords
composed of mad scientists and Generalissimos and crazy Spy Chiefs... and maybe some nutty
press types from the official media and puppet press to lead us in the Two Minutes Hate against
the Alpha Centauri folks, the space peoples, and the flying saucer people...
Maghreb2 5 hours ago
CIA already had plans for all this under the Stargate Program. After Ike's treaty with
various alien species the MIC began its descent into madness and universal conquest.
surroundedbyijits 6 hours ago
A war like that might "free" you, because the Russians will kick your ***.
balz 7 hours ago
Each time I see this "Office of the President Elect" picture thing, I get nauseous.
Fake office for a fake president who wasn't elected in the first place.
BLOTTO 8 hours ago
Like nothing happened back here at home.
Max21c 6 hours ago
Blinken may prove out to be more slick and savy than Dumbo Pompeo the flying cartoon
elephant but he's still a fawking neanderthal and a ******. Maybe an elite ****** but he's
still a ******. Blind, deaf, and dumb is still blind, deaf, and dumb even with all the powers
of the secret police at their disposal.
Ms No PREMIUM 7 hours ago
Rand is sick too. He goes on about how these things are bad specifically because they
strengthened Iran? How about liberty crushing mass murder?
"Sen. Paul said the administration of former President Barack Obama spent $250 million (USD)
on training 60 rebels [as part of the DoD side; the CIA program was much more expansive], which
he said was a waste of money."
So your mad they steal money while creating terrorists? Or are you mad that they don't tell
you what they do with the rest? They abduct children from war zones to make them. Maybe the
indoctrination and rape children's homes are expensive. They have screwed the entire
planet.
There is something wrong with him too. He is another limited hangout
silverlinings00 7 hours ago
He's all bark no bite like Elizabeth Warren. Trotted out to show a feigning resistance.
Insert farm animal here 4 hours ago
Poor Rand is going to have a tough and lonely battle over the next few years. Let's wish him
well, he'll be going it alone for sure.
the_pencil 2 hours ago
It seems odd that no one has allied themselves with him in the same manner as McCain &
Graham.
Pareto 6 hours ago
Another life long bureaucrat talking about his resume. And fails to answer a simple
question. Woop there it is. That's why they hated Trump. Because somebody off the street had
better answers than 25 years of experience.
Rand Paul, one of the few good ones left. Good Luck with Biden and his war hawks!
NumbNuts 6 hours ago
These same people are attempting a regime change in the United States too. From Freedom to
Fascism.
Helg Saracen 6 hours ago
The Americans lost perspectives and actually real freedom when Woodrow Wilson sold US to
international banksters in 1913, now this scam just ends and a new scam begins. You haven't
figured it out yet. By the way, fascism is Italian National Socialism. No offense.
frank further 6 hours ago
Then what was German National Socialism, if not fascism?
/
/
BluCapitalist PREMIUM 6 hours ago (Edited)
They are not attempting. They have done it. They have perfected their craft over the last 70
years in other countries and they brought it home to keep their criminal organization
going.
urhotdogs 6 hours ago remove link
They didn't attempt, they did it! Took a little over 4 years but had to stoop to massive
election fraud and changing state laws on the fly. It was coordinated throughout all levels of
government down to states and courts and SCOTUS.
bunkers 5 hours ago
Communism
bunkers 5 hours ago
Maybe not.
WhiteHose 6 hours ago
Russia Russia Russia! They never stop! BTW, wheres scumbag Hunter?
starman99 7 hours ago
(((Anthony Blinken)))
rkb100100 7 hours ago
Yea we know the cabinet is full of heeb's.
brown_hornet 7 hours ago
Is he in the boat with Winken and Nod?
GatorMcClusky 7 hours ago
Good one.
Mount Massive 7 hours ago (Edited)
There is a reason Russia has spent the last 2 months ramping up testing of its mil hardware
including hyper-vel ICBM's and SLBM's. - Xiden
SelectedNotElectedBiden 7 hours ago
Rand will be the only Senator to give the Dems a hard time. Sad since it should be payback
for EVERY Republican Senator.
freakscene 7 hours ago
Cruz will be fun to watch too. They excel being outnumbered.
Ms No PREMIUM 7 hours ago
If they wanted Rand out of that spot he would have been gone a long time ago.
Bob Lidd 5 hours ago
Does anyone think the US policy in the middle east will change with 10 of biden's
appointees being jewish .......??
The "greater israel" will continue no matter the cost to the American tax cattle.......
((((blinken))) ..........
ReadyForHillary 7 hours ago
The neocons are back!
Max21c 7 hours ago
The neocons are back!
Does not matter. They could not win before and they shall not win now. They're ineffective,
inept, and incompetent. They won't be able to fix the messes and disasters they've created for
themselves. At best they might be able to sick the secret police on a few people at home and
drop some bombs or missiles abroad. But for the most part it's some more of the same. Evil is
as evil does. They're not going to be able to work themselves out of the fix they've got
themselves into or figure it out. They're toast. They're bad people and they're toast.
Washingtonians may have absolute power but they've had absolute power all along...and they
still can't fix the disasters they've caused.
Northern Exposure 6 hours ago (Edited)
Oh thank God!
If we're not looking for a new pointless war to start or jumping into an existing one then
this isn't the America that I know and love!
</sarc>
karzai_luver 7 hours ago
Where is the BUFFALOBILL dude storming the Senate to drag this blinken criminal scum out and
do justice for his wanton murder of thousands?
Shut down this freak show.
I would rather have BUFFALOBILL and his idiots running the place than these feckless
people's representatives.
Tony , have you learned your lesson?
Senator - screw you and your people I will think it over.
Alexander 7 hours ago
Silence republicans! Yes we stole the election using widespread mail in ballots, yes your
state governments changed the rules to allow us to count these mail in ballots more quickly,
yes there were far more votes in this election than any other ever. ANDDDD... NO we will not
look into the validity of this election becuase muh capital rioting grandma threatened sweet
little socialist AOC.
Now give us your children to fight a war in syria.
artless 7 hours ago
Barack Obama. Neocon to the core. Biden is no different. Gonna do us some "liberating"
again. And from the left there will be silence as thousands of poor, short brown people are
killed as "collateral damage".
Welcome back America to what you do the best. Destroy lives. Any over/under on how many days
it takes Biden to start killing folks and hence become a war criminal like pretty much all his
predecessors? I might like a piece of that action.
SassyPants 7 hours ago
Republicans are neocons, democrats are neoliberal. You're basically right, just left out
half the problem.
pods 7 hours ago
Can't bitch about foreign actions in our elections when we pick other governments.
Invert This, Media Matters Monkeys 7 hours ago
Pick ???? Surely you jest !
pods 7 hours ago
We choose sides right?
We picked the CIA stooge in Venezuela.
Not sure about your question.
Maybe "kinetically pick" would be better?
Invert This, Media Matters Monkeys 7 hours ago
Sorry, I didn't read your post properly. I didn't see "other" governments.
rwe2late 7 hours ago
you either forgot the sarc tag
or failed to notice such as V. Nuland hand-picking leadership in Ukraine,
or the Trump picking of Guiado for Venezuela.
Invert This, Media Matters Monkeys 7 hours ago
Poor eye sight is my best and only excuse.
SelectedNotElectedBiden 7 hours ago
Where is Hunter?
Invert This, Media Matters Monkeys 7 hours ago
The Big Guy made him the Advance Minister of Foreign Extortion.
headslapper 7 hours ago
The faces change but the song remains the same. What a waste of energy this government is.
Resources thrown down the toilet to make the Ruling class more wealthy. Why do we even pay
attention. We all need to have a look in the mirror. Myself included of course.
Armed Resistance 7 hours ago
So now that you've looked in the mirror, what are you going to do about it? Send a
strongly-worded letter? Or are you ready to actually step up. As morally wrong and demented as
the radical left is, at least you have to admire them in the sense they actually step up to the
plate to get sh!t done. It's immoral, but effective.
Canadian Dirtlump 7 hours ago
Lest we forget the same bearded butchers that Chris Stevens flew into ben gazi with (al
Quaeda inter alia aligned ) who were funded and trained by the West were the same ones who flew
from ben gazi to the incirlik nato base to try to do the same thing in syria.
The only reason it didn't work was because of the SAA, Hezbollah and of course the ultimate
backstop Russia. I'm thankful for this.
mikka 7 hours ago
Imagine Russian or Chinese parliament publicly debating regime change in USA.
Uncle_Cuddles 7 hours ago (Edited)
Debating? China has ALREADY done it here.
joew8989 7 hours ago
Rand will continue to fight the good fight, when you live a life based on principal, that's
what you do. We will always need more people like him. That's what built this country, not the
parasites at the helm now.
ItsTooHotForThis 6 hours ago
Paul voted to confirm the electors. His challenge to the new Sec. of State means
nothing.
Garciathinksso 5 hours ago
his argument was based on State's right issue, in case you care
bunkers 5 hours ago
It doesn't matter WHY, he voted with traitors, only, that he did.
SillyTheEnemy 6 hours ago (Edited)
This is literally the only guy we have in the senate who even remotely gives a ****. Yet the
amount of **** that is going to happen to us when biden heats up the war in Syria is
immeasurable. F*ck me
hardright 6 hours ago
Rand Paul is wasting his time.
If he wants to make a difference he should be lobbying Russia to send more troops into
Syria.
surroundedbyijits 6 hours ago
And arranging imports of the Russian vaccine. Less likely to kill you and more effective
than the only 45% effective Pfizer ****.
BluCapitalist PREMIUM 6 hours ago
This guys eyes look exactly like the vampires in the movie 30 days of night. Am I in a
simulation? Why do these people actually look like fictional villains? I mean Whitmer, Newsom,
this new fat, unhealthy, mentally ill assistant "health secretary"? Did I do something really
wrong? Am I in hell and don't know it? No. I am here on earth and psychopaths are real and evil
is real.
duckandcover 1 hour ago
they're just a little scared and overwhelmed. You might be too
WhiteHose 7 hours ago
Look at this Blinken twit! F you pal! And....wheres HUnter??? Diddling his brothers minor
niece? Again? Still?
First Ron and now Rand. I think the club just lets them in as the token Don Quixote. They
have been the only voices of reason for the last 25 years or so, but they are only tilting at
windmills. Nothing is going to change until something forces them to change. The war mongering
and corruption will just roll right along while the MIC and congress get richer by the
minute.
The unrelenting droning of brown people in foreign lands that are ill-equipped to fight back
will commence in 3,2,1...
SassyPants 7 hours ago
Leaving the Republican Party would be the first best step.
ejmoosa 7 hours ago (Edited)
We put too much on one man and one man alone to change things.
Faced with judges and a House and A Senate against him the task before Trump was
Herculean.
Add to that 2/5ths of the states with governors also against Trump and it's even worse.
What you need to do is get involved in your local politics and take control back of your
Cities and County Commissions, as well as your state governments.
Had Trump held control of the House and the Senate and we had sitting on Courts people who
put the Constitution first FOR the people rather than using it against them, things would be a
lot different today.
The choice is yours.
Time to play 7 hours ago
It's good to see that Rand, is starting to think more like his father!
north_hand_demon 7 hours ago
So he's controlled opposition, too?
Lyman54 7 hours ago
Pretty early to be smoking crack isn't it?
otschelnik 7 hours ago
With Cookies Nuland as Blinken's deputy, you've got the neocon family business installed at
Foggy Bottom. Robert (Victoria's huband), Fredrick, and Kim each with their own pro-war think
tank, and a list of supporters which constitute the "A-list" of the USSA's merchants of death.
Northrup-Grumman, UTX, Raytheon, Lockheed....
9.1ontherichterscale 7 hours ago
Winken, Blinken and Nod.
That's the administration we got now.
silverlinings00 8 hours ago
Careful Rand, we wouldn't want you to get another "visit" from a neighbor while you're
mowing the lawn.
Pdunne 3 hours ago (Edited)
Biden's biggest Cabinet mistake will ultimately be Blinken.
Like Obama picked H Clinton with disasterous consequences Biden picks Blinken.
JackOliver4 4 hours ago
Rand Paul says " Assad is a terrible person " !!!
Dr Assad is a HERO !!
Rand Paul is either completely misinformed or just another useless politician afraid to
speak the TRUTH !
A COWARD !
Hessler 4 hours ago
Assad may be a good person at heart but he is not qualified to run a state. He should be a
doctor or something.
JackOliver4 4 hours ago
And Joe Biden is ??
OR Boris Johnstone ??
Helg Saracen 4 hours ago
It is up to the Syrians to decide, not you. You already paid for the genocide of the Syrian
Christians in the "fight against the tyrant Assad." I've seen all kinds of idiots and
hypocrites, but you are their king.
Hessler 4 hours ago (Edited)
Why did not Assad anticipated the Zionist invasion even though the Snowden document reveled
the CIA/Mossad works in the making in 2006 ??
If he did anticipated an invasion why he did not do anything to safeguard his nation and
it's people ?
Why every men, women and child capable to lift and shoot was not given and an ordinance and
proper training ?? Israel has that. Why can't Syria ?
Syria is a part of Greater Israel. They have been marked for genocide the day Israel was
created, what haste did Mr. Assad showed to safeguard his country against their genocidal
maniacs psychopaths ??
I will never forgive those who inflicted the terrible atrocities on the children and women
and Mr. Assad has a blame to share.
mark3383 3 hours ago
Assad risked his life and continues to do so every day, trump recently bragged he thought
about "taking him out". he's a true hero more than you or I will ever be
steve2241 5 hours ago
Rand Paul doesn't understand. Blinken follows the path that Israel tells him to. Middle East
instability benefits Israel. The fomenting of Sunni-Shia conflict kills Israels' enemies, the
muslims, without Israel having to lift a finger. Syria is no longer a threat to Israel. Mission
accomplished.
Hessler 4 hours ago (Edited)
You're wrong on two accounts. First, there's no ****te/Sunni conflict. What goes in Miiddle
East is entire different than what is portrayed here. The locals know but how many of them get
interviewed on live TV or get a airtime on a prime time desk ? Those are reserved for the
chosenites who spew BS about Arabs and Muslims 24/7.
****te/Sunni fiction as broadcasts in the west is nothing but a ploy to wash the hands of
the responsibility and pin the blame on the victims.
Second, Syria is now a bigger threat to Israel than it was in Pre War era. Battle Hardened
troops, better organization, training with Russian/Iranian Military, better equipment, talented
strategists and when you fight a war like that for that long you tend to grow a bigger set of
balls.
JackOliver4 4 hours ago
Syria wants the GOLAN back - I would say they are a threat to ISRAEL !!
Sick Monkey 5 hours ago
Speaking of war didn't Rand Paul vote to accept the illegitimate electors. I like Paul he
seems to have a level head but you voted to put the commies in power. Like you said in your
speech "there are repercussions". Those who took a stand against this coup must be kept in
power as they put skin in the game. That's a rare and precious gift to us the people. In the
year 2021 it's as good as gold.
Taffer 5 hours ago
Exactly, hence my previous comment below.
mark3383 3 hours ago
trump lost the election because he allowed million of fraud votes to be counted and never
said or did anything about it in the year leading up to it. he 's the one that lost it. no one
else
Sinophile 6 hours ago
"War Pigs"----Black Sabbath
Generals gathered in their masses
Just like witches at black masses
Evil minds that plot destruction
Sorcerers of death's construction
In the fields the bodies burning
As the war machine keeps turning
Death and hatred to mankind
Poisoning their brainwashed minds
Oh lord yeah!
Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to the poor
Yeah!
Time will tell on their power minds
Making war just for fun
Treating people just like pawns in chess
Wait 'til their judgement day comes
Yeah!
Now in darkness world stops turning
Ashes where the bodies burning
No more war pigs have the power
Hand of God has struck the hour
Day of judgement, God is calling
On their knees the war pig's crawling
Begging mercy for their sins
Satan laughing spreads his wings
oh lord yeah!
surroundedbyijits 6 hours ago
Circuses. Theatre for the plebes. Not one bit of foreign policy is decided or affected by
debates or hearings in the Legislative branch. They're all following a script, some of them act
like they aren't in on the joke.
Cloudcrusher 6 hours ago
Psychosis the denial of reality. The military industrial complex is make believe. It's
military industrial congress, Congress is in charge they alone are to blame know one else. The
sooner everyone starts living in reality the better off will be. You want to win the war of
words better start with reality. Or your going to get a another kind of war one where only the
strong survive.
Max21c 6 hours ago (Edited)
Watch: Rand Paul Challenges New Secretary Of State Over Regime-Change In Syria
Meaningless inside the beltway for the record drool-n-dribble... Rand Paul just wants to pad
his resume, bio, and gain some street cred claims...
TahoeBilly2012 6 hours ago
When do the new wars start? Dems can't wait. Blame them on Covid or something, they will buy
it.
vspam 7 hours ago
Biden will go to war with Iran and turned thr ME into a fireball. The mainstream media will
cheer him on under the banner of peace and unity
Max21c 7 hours ago
Diablo Corona
Washingtonians are for the most part the spawn of Satan.
DC= the Devil's City... they are evil... Washingtonians are just pure rotten evil...
Washington DC ... Devil's City
Washington DC .... Devil's Crown
The evil ones cannot change their evil ways... they're too far gone... the evil ones cannot
be redeemed...
Max21c 7 hours ago
Paul concluded by saying that regime change needs to end because it is involving the US in
long wars that are costly to the military.
Too late. Washington is toast. It's just a question of when Washingtonians lose in Syria,
Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Libya, et cetera. They already made a mess of things and they do not
have the brains to fix it. Same with their inabilities as regards nonproliferation, North
Korea, et cetera. They don't have what it takes to figure it out and work it out and nobody is
going to fix it for them because they're assholes regardless of which cabal of Ivy League
assholes or ******* elites are in power.
ThomasEdmonds 7 hours ago
Paul isn't supposed to question a Zionist's motives..
aloha-snackbar 7 hours ago
if the youth said no to war and moms said not my child and burned down the recruitment/death
centers then war would end...
tunEphsh 7 hours ago
Thank goodness that Paul told the idiot Blicken to lay off regime change. Obama-Biden made a
mess of the middle east and caused a refugee crises which is still with us. Instead of being
named secretary of state, me thinks Blicken should be put in jail for acts in the Middle East
which killed hundreds of thousands of people.
moneybots 7 hours ago
The EU has become a mess because of regime change.
freakscene 7 hours ago
Of course he should. But that would require sanity.
yerfej 7 hours ago (Edited)
Simple way to stop all this insane venturism and nation building it to MANDATE that every
aysshole like Blinken have a spouse or child or sibling or relative ON THE GROUND fighting in
one of these shyyytholes. These elites love this crap because THEY never pay a personal price,
no they have farmed that out to the "commoners" who supply the bodies. The filthy elites are
good at leveraging everyone else to fulfill their fantasies while paying no price.
Occams_Razor_Trader 7 hours ago
You've seen the videos of Chelsea and Malia on tour in Kabul? Yeah?
yerfej 7 hours ago
More like Eeyore pontificating from her 20 million dollar penthouse about how she is so not
into money, or Maglia dancing around stoned like a "social justice warrior".
Flynt2142ahh 7 hours ago (Edited)
The senate needs more Rand Paul types - and they dont have to be in the Republican
party...This would force actual accountability of uniparty folks and these appointees. We need
less murkowski and collins
phillyla 7 hours ago
I am going to harp on this
in 2014 Matt Bevin challenged McConnell in a Senate Primary
He was gaining momentum
Then Rand endorsed McConnell
Bevin lost McConnell got re-elected
Bevin was later elected Governor of KY so he had the votes
Rand Paul Broke my heart
Leguran@premium PREMIUM 7 hours ago
We need use the Progressive's signage: He is not my President.
LostMyGunsInABoatingAccident 7 hours ago
You can't necessarily call it an "American" policy.
America lost control of it's policy long ago.....
Mount Massive 7 hours ago
Here comes another war, and this time, it will spiral out of control. In two years or less,
I expect the US to be in a major conflict and/or hit at home. Sigh....Leftist
Invert This, Media Matters Monkeys 7 hours ago
Pelosi just took Rand aside and said, wait and see what your neighbor on the other side of
you has to say about this.
9.1ontherichterscale 7 hours ago
Rand is in the senate. nancy runs the house. That would be Schumer's job.
Invert This, Media Matters Monkeys 7 hours ago
Pelosi seems to be running the show and is the face of the party
WorkingClassMan 8 hours ago (Edited)
Rand Paul, the lone voice of sanity in a rubber-stamp corrupt government.
If you or someone you care about is either in or thinking about joining this nation's
military...please don't. Let these antiwhites fight their own wars. They hate you and don't
trust you because you're White and they hate you owning guns, but they'll put a gun in your
hand and point you at their and Isn'treal's enemies without hesitation.
fudge punch 8 hours ago
Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
AVmaster 3 hours ago
"Regime change in the Middle East has led to chaos, instability and more terrorism,"
Uhhh, yea...
... Thats what they WANTED!
Duh!
Scipio Africanuz 3 hours ago
Thank you Senator Paul..
For your candor..
The challenge of US Foreign Policy, is akin to a heroin addiction. It's bad for the country,
but all attempts to cure the country of addiction to imperialism has failed, including our
energetic efforts over the years..
Too many people benefit from the ruination of the country as it engages in squandering
lives, honor, power, reputation, and treasure, in maintaining a facade of illusory power, at
the expense of the true power of the country..
Put simply Senator, at this point, we don't believe any entity on earth can cure the US of
the addiction to depravity save nature, which cure is more preferable to that of the Entity
whose decision is not subject to appeal..
Now Senator, you may not believe in God Almighty and thus, swat away the simple insight but
God does not require your belief to act..
Over His creation..
The only cure, if sense and rationality don't prevail, is exactly what we don't desire to
know and why?
Because we've seen it before, applied to different societies with similar mentality over the
course of human history and Senator, it's never palatable..
Anyhow, probation is till summer, to allow folks do intensive introspective contemplation,
enough to acquire prudent humility and if they don't, well..
Cheers...
Ckierst1 2 hours ago
I believe the Senator is a Christian.
Pdunne 4 hours ago
Blinken is a bald faced liar and is already working with Ms Nuland on more regime
changes.
Venezuela and Syria need to get ready for more robust attacks.
Dzerzhhinsky 2 hours ago
Control the oil, you control the world.
the_pencil 2 hours ago
Oil was the cause of every war for the past century.
Posa 4 hours ago
A ridiculous exchange. Sen Paul seems to take at face value the Liberal-NeoCon claim that
Regime Change is good-intentioned attempt to democratize the Middle East.
Hardly. Regime Change was always designed to a) install Israeli supremacy in the region
("Operation Clean Break"); and b) secure US Global Uni-polar dominance (the Wolfowitz Doctrine)
as part of the Brezezinski "Grand Chessboard". That's the intention... this exchange
demonstrates how out of it Rand Paul is; and what a nasty weasel Blinken is.
Ckierst1 2 hours ago
That's not what Sen. Paul said. He doesn't agree with regime change. That's what he
said.
PaulDF 5 hours ago
To which the Biden appointee replied, "You know, the thing!"
mark3383 3 hours ago
cmon man!
duckandcover 2 hours ago
do your job!
Taffer 5 hours ago
Rand Paul's opinion and $6 will get him a latte at Starbucks.
Hessler 6 hours ago (Edited)
Foreign policy is never gonna change no matter who's in change because the way system is
setup.
The lifestyle (our way of life) pertaining to the western model of civilization (our values)
needs unlimited supply of money to be supported. The money that can't be made by legal means,
hence the continues war that needs to be maintained overseas while also starting new ones as
requirement arise.
And since this is a continues state, so accompanies it continues propaganda, lies, false
flags, deception and manipulation of facts and truth. LYING IS IN VERY GENES OF THE WHITE
CHRISTIAN WEST. They have been doing it for so long that they have almost mastered the "the art
of lying" the zenith of which is to project your own flaws and crimes on to the subjects you
carried it out on. One thing you can always be sure of, they will never admit their crimes
unless there's no other way. And that they will be accusing their opponents of the same things
they would be doing.
War underpins their society, nation and civilization.
steve2241 4 hours ago
The problem is that the U.S. is abusing its position as printer-in-chief of the Reserve
Currency of the world. With that fake money, it can intervene in the affairs of nations
throughout the world - a capability that no other country enjoys. Take away its reserve
currency and watch how quickly middle eastern strife ends - and the nation of Israel, too.
apparently 6 hours ago
will the left and their mindless supporters be comforted to know that their guy promotes
these "endless wars"? will they be happy to sacrifice their sons and daughters for desert
real-estate whose oil we don't want?
Paul was being way too polite. He should simply say: "I'm not voting to confirm this war
monger" then get up and leave the room.
Hessler 6 hours ago
If you think it's about the oil, you really don't understand the world you inhabit.
apparently 6 hours ago (Edited)
I don't think it's about oil but I'm struggling to name a single US interest in sand-wars.
maybe you can? yes, yes, military/industrial complex, blah, blah, but why the middle east?
please enlighten us.
Hessler 5 hours ago (Edited)
It's to rebuild the world in the image of the west and Islam is the biggest hampering in the
way. Like other religions, it can't be altered or dominated so the only way is to completely
destroy it. This is why Israel was setup by the Anglos at a strategic location in the heart of
the Arab world to engage them into perpetual war and destroy them.
That's about it.
And whenever a war on a civilization is waged, there are always monetary benefits. Oil, MIC,
Political donations come into play here. But that's just a sideshow. And with a civilization as
big as Islamic, benefits also tend to be massive.
apparently 5 hours ago
no evidence that the arab spring was against islam. why aren't we doing regime change in
indonesia? why did joe just reverse the Muslim travel ban?
do you understand anything about the world you live in?
Hessler 5 hours ago (Edited)
A lot actually. We are concentrating on the core of the Islamic civilization for when the
core collapses, the outer layers collapses with it. It's the core that holds the entire thing
together, hence we concentrate on Middle East and not on Indonesia.
Arab spring was to sow chaos and turmoil. By the way of deception.....Jewish moto
It is not that Israel establishes America's foreign policy. It is that the basic world view
produced by WASP culture is naturally aligned with Jewish thought in most ways, especially in
terms of Empire: ruling the world.
InflammatoryResponse 5 hours ago
it was not a muslim travel ban. it was a ban on places that didn't have adequate
infrastructure to verify who was travling.
duckandcover 1 hour ago
where is the last place, core or not core, that Islam religion and Muslim culture has been
eradicated by any means? Yugoslavia? India? Not seeing it. Culture eats strategy for breakfast.
Your argument does not hold.
starman99 5 hours ago
(((THEM)))
Groucho 5 hours ago
No of course not. Nothing to do with what George Kennan called "the greatest strategic
material prize in world history".
Hessler 5 hours ago
And whenever a war on a civilization is waged, there are always monetary benefits. Oil, MIC,
Political donations come into play here. But that's just a sideshow. And with a civilization as
big as Islamic, benefits also tend to be massive.
apparently 2 hours ago
by now, we should be weary (and wary) of "it's all a sideshow" arguments.
it simply asserts greater knowledge (never disclosed) and terminates the thread.
as for the grand anti-islam plan... how's that going in western europe?
Groucho 5 hours ago
No of course not. Nothing to do with what George Kennan called "the greatest strategic
material prize in world history".
JackOliver4 4 hours ago
It is ALWAYS about the OIL - thats why IRAN and VENEZUELA are being weakened by crippling
sanctions !!
THAT"S how the ZIO/US does it - SANCTIONS first - WAR 2nd !
Doesn't work anymore since RUSSIA stepped in !
nocturnal66 7 hours ago
Just ask if this 100 year plus war is to create "greater Israel" . It all documented. Enough
already with the lies. Just admit it.
Occams_Razor_Trader 7 hours ago
WWE- fake fights have begun again in earnest .....................
Paul Ryan could fake a punch as good as John Boehner ............
Max21c 7 hours ago (Edited)
"Maybe we shouldn't be 'choosing' governments in the Middle East," Paul continued.
The Washington establishment imposed their chosen ruler Joe Schmo Biden to rule over
America.
jesus_loves_you 7 hours ago
H a n g t h e m a l l
Aquamaster 7 hours ago
Should we have a contest to see who can pick the first country Biden will send troops
to?
Lyman54 7 hours ago
DC !
SERReal1 7 hours ago
You win!
WTFUD 7 hours ago
Blinken Heck , don't worry ya'll, Nuland (Nudelman's) back to steady the ship with a fab new
chocolate chip cookie recipe that the terrorists will adore.
littlewing 7 hours ago
And they aren't even trying to hide it.
fzrkid 7 hours ago
Rand can say whatever he wants and it changes NOTHING
Armed Resistance 7 hours ago
Who is still planning on filing taxes? At the very least, turn your back on the
system-right? Upvote for not filing, downvote for I just want to avoid conflict-I'm filing.
brown_hornet 7 hours ago
But, we are getting a return.
No paying next year though.
rwe2late 7 hours ago (Edited)
Doesn't matter if it is a disaster for the peoples invaded and for domestic liberty in the
USA.
It's considered "worth it" by those in power
to protect the financial supremacy of the dollar,
promote the regional military supremacy of Israel,
and continue the war profiteering of the MIC.
north_hand_demon 7 hours ago
So what? Your cushy lifestyle and mine is a direct result of hegemony. Get over it.
rwe2late 7 hours ago (Edited)
Celebration of a "cushy lifestyle" gained by plunder and murder is not for everyone.
To revel in it, one requires a special insensibility.
DonGenaro 7 hours ago (Edited)
This fence-sitter did virtually NOTHING to stop the steal.
Now he's whining about having to lie in bed his cowardice helped make.
Many MORE thousands will soon be massacred by these war-mad psychopaths.
This POS is DEAD TO ME.
littlewing 7 hours ago
Rand is smart, he knew no matter what Xiden was going to be installed.
HominyTwin 7 hours ago
He's smart. A bunch of idiots, after a good breakfast at IHOP, were herded into the capital
by govt informants to break stuff for the cameras, and then herded right back out in time for a
hearty dinner at Golden Corral. They did sacrifice their lunch for exactly nothing, though.
Congrats. He stayed away from all that nonsense.
9.1ontherichterscale 7 hours ago
That's about the size of it, in retrospect.
zulu127 7 hours ago
regime change needs to end because it is involving the US in long wars that are costly to
the military.
Wrong! "regime change needs to continue because it is involving the US in wars that are
profitable to the military.
ableman28 4 hours ago
Part of the problems is that neither the democrats or republicans are primarily in favor of
DEMOCRATIC governments in the middle east. When Egypt FREELY ELECTED the Muslin Brotherhood to
power in Egypt the US fell all over itself to help unseat them, using every technique we
can.....currency debasement, food aid manipulation, tacit encouragement to strongment
(military) that we feel are controllable, etc. etc.
The US was never in favor of one man one vote in South Africa during apartheid and explained
this convenient hypocrisy as an unfortunate necessity.
Supporting regime change is entirely, ENTIRELY, different than supporting democracy. The US
has a very very very long history of supporting the former and claiming it was the latter when
in fact it wasn't. Democracy means letting the chips fall where they may. In countries whose
ruling leadership is oppressive to its people and for which we have a long history of support
its very unlikely that any democratic election would bring us new friends. It would, in every
case, bring to power people who opposed the old government and by association US.
People playing to the stands here in the US are smart enough to know this. But maintaining
the correct political position for domestic consumption also trumps doing the right thing in
anywhere else.
International politics is a pure expression of national interest. Our national interest is
economic outside the US. That part of socialist or marxist theory is spot on.
Hessler 4 hours ago
Insightful, thanks!
LooseLee 4 hours ago
'Disaster' is the MO, Rand. Please, get real or get lost.
Musum 5 hours ago
Senator Rand Paul recently challenged the new Secretary of State nominee Anthony Blinken
on his history of pushing regime change in the Middle East and North Africa
Pointless and hopeless. The only way to end America's endless wars is to deal with the guys
in small hats.
Hessler 5 hours ago
Small hats were employed by the English speaking protestants for their ulterior motives,
world view, global ambitions which were in alignment with the chosenites.
You can't solve the Jewish problem without solving the problem of western civilization.
Fire_Hog 5 hours ago
The real problems are the 3 letter intelligence agencies, not religion.
Musum 4 hours ago
Are you naive or misdirecting? Offices are occupied by people.
train rider 6 hours ago
Deep thinking and reflection...what about our military personnel and contractors...why are
we putting them in danger with these interventionist kockamamie screw balls coming up with
these strategies...meanwhile innocent civilians keep getting maimed and killed.
We have no business over there, let the countries decide for themselves what they want etc.
we need energy idependence...greta can go fly a kite...keep reducing emissions with tech we
have.
It is very sad that paul's neighbor does not have a more lethal right hook.
TheZeitgeist 7 hours ago
Sen. Paul began his argument by questioning Blinken's role in the NATO intervention of Libya
in 2001
So...only off by a decade. I think ZeroHedge drops these snafus into the copy just to see if
anyone actually reads the stuff.
freakscene 7 hours ago (Edited)
Its skimming material at best. Reading all the way through went out the window when ZH
become a CNN sponsor.
:)
littlewing 7 hours ago
When Ron Paul was calling out Bernanke you would see they were alone in the room.
There is no debate, its all a fraud. Saw the vote on election theft and it was their aides
voting for them.
StanleyTheManly 7 hours ago
Give me a break, Rand Paul. YOU KNOWINGLY voted for this by not standing for our elected
President.
You're a traitor. Shut up and sit down.
TRON Paul 7 hours ago
PRESIDENT PAUL!
PRESIDENT PAUL!
PRESIDENT PAUL!
wmbz 7 hours ago
War is a business, and "we" are big business. Matter no how many completely innocent people
get blown away. What matters are the spoils. We were warned over and over again about the MIC
yet here we are.
Profit always wins over peace, no money in it.
totally unwise 7 hours ago
Today, wars aren't meant to be won
they're meant to bring chaos
Chaos
Calling Maxwell Smart and agent 99
Where's that shoe phone ?
freakscene 7 hours ago
I guess, good for Rand? Thats about all he can do.
Dog Will Hunting 7 hours ago
Oh, that Rand Paul. I wondered where he was hiding this whole time peels back Trump's saggy
*** cheeks to find the good doctor
in_xanadu_did_kubla_khan 8 hours ago
Achoo: Hey, Blinkin
Blinkin: Did you say Abe Lincoln?
Achoo: No! I said, HEY, BLINKIN!
createnewaccount 8 hours ago
If we can't have Giant Meteor maybe a global helter skelter of 'regime change' will be a
good consolation prize.
Lt. Frank Drebin 8 hours ago
I voted for Giant Meteor, but the Dominion voting machines switched my vote to turd
sandwich.
Holding My Breath 7 hours ago
A big upvote for sarcasm (or is it utter stupidity?)
The Military/Industrial Complex needs endless foreign wars and imaginary enemies so that the
money won't be spent at home helping Americans. Such as infrastructure projects. The goal from
within is to destroy the American middle class and turn the United States into a third world
country. Clinton, Bush, Obama and Trump all served the crooks.
littlewing 7 hours ago
Uh then why didn't Trump start wars?
Bear 11 minutes ago
Like father like son ... insight and wisdom
Arizona1234 26 minutes ago
China Joe and the mentally ill Marxist that run his crap show already started a multi
Trillion dollar endless war. The War on the weather they call Climate Crisis. It's the one
where we loose and wind up praying to find the small potato to make it through the day, and
then hope to find a few dry sticks for the fire to cook it. Where you will have to make the
small fire at night so that mentally ill #AOC carbon police can't easily see the smoke.
Maltheus 1 hour ago
It's taken less than 24 hours, after Biden's inauguration, for ISIS to magically make an
appearance again. They're not even pretending anymore.
Tom Angle 2 hours ago
I think I had heard all I want to hear from Rand Paul after.
boattrash 2 hours ago
Gawdamit Rand, we like you and everything, but the Coup you should be focused on is HERE,
even if it means you should spit in your hands, hoist the black flag and start slittin
throats.
Sincerely,
The American People
Dzerzhhinsky 3 hours ago
If the US can steal Syria, it means it will be able to build a pipeline, steal Iranian gas
and sell it to Europe.
The US needs something to give its financiers and controlling energy supplies to Europe would
go a long way to paying off the debt.
learnofjesuits 4 hours ago
vatican's wars
Hessler 3 hours ago
Puritans burred the Vatican so deep underground that if even the nuke detonates there, if
won't make a shockwave on the ground
TemporarySecurity 4 hours ago
Perfectly fine for anybody in the executive to lie through their teeth.
Say one thing in the hearing and do what they always do once confirmed. Our post
Constitutional government needs to fail.
tangent 4 hours ago
Ran Paul's ability to talk as if they are not simply being outright bribed for their
positions is impressive. I suppose the new CCP SoS will take the positions of the CCP, which is
the one paying him the most money for those positions.
richnhappy 4 hours ago
Just read confessions of an economic hit man, by john perkins, all you need to know. The
playbook sounds like what china is doing in the us now, distract the masses with the middle
east ****show.
Seditious 4 hours ago
We have had just one president so far this century that has not used American blood and
treasure to destroy a nation. He was a rogue billionaire that got taken out by every other
billionaire that wanted to stay in the club. The American people are going to have to figure
out that they will have better results solving this nations problems at the Bezos, Walton,
Zuckerberg and Dorsey homes than they will going to the Capitol in Washington DC.
The Child sacrifice murders committed by these people don't occur in some hidden room at a
pizza parlor. They occur on public roads under semitrailers marked Amazon Prime and Walmart
that wouldn't be allowed on the roads of nations that we used to call the third world.
I suppose the only big question is, who's child dies tomorrow?
Maghreb2 4 hours ago
You could look it at that way. I'd say he was a hairs breadth from starting world war III
with Iran and China and was removed by a stroke of bad luck from Wuhan and the old
establishment asserting their authority through corruption.
Trump might be remembered fondly for actually lowering the number of small conflicts but the
U.S war machine is bigger than any one president and his closeness to Israel show what camp he
was in. Only God or a few insiders can really judge what his ultimate aim was but he wasn't the
man who pulled the first shot of the first world war. Damn well loaded the gun and gave it to
the Israelis in my opinion.
Seditious 4 hours ago
During Obama's time in office we had a year in which the United States dropped bombs in more
nations than they did in any single year during WW2.
Bezos, Walton's and others spill our blood domestically. Biden will spill our blood overseas
to keep some other billionaires happy.
Based on your comment, I take it you REALLY like Blinken! Yes?
Fire_Hog 5 hours ago
The same thing happened in Egypt when Obama pushed for and got quick elections when the only
organization that could field candidates was the Muslim Brotherhood. The result was very
predictable.
The Brotherhood took over and the result was so bad that the people finally rebelled against
Morsi's government. This lead to Al Sisi who was better than Morsi. I question whether the
situation improved by letting the Muslim Brotherhood take control.
Maghreb2 4 hours ago
People? Thought that was the military?
WatchnSee 5 hours ago
"regime change doesn't work" "Maybe we shouldn't be 'choosing' governments in the Middle
East,".... nor in the USA. Time will tell.
Hessler 6 hours ago (Edited)
Don't worry Mr. Paul, these white men in the suits are the leaders of the terrorists groups.
It's hardcoded in their genes, they don't know any other way of earning a living.
Mancolo 6 hours ago
Lessons? I don't need your stinking lessons. I've got friends to pay off.
Pvt Joker PREMIUM 7 hours ago
I like the US policy of Perma War and Regime change. The more troops over there , the less
troops over here.
Scornd 7 hours ago
I dont understand the complaints.
You voted for this.
MCDirtMigger 6 hours ago
By 'you', do you mean Dominion?
littlewing 7 hours ago
District of Criminals
that's all they are.
I am bailing out forever now.
Just looking at them and their actions is self harm.
Max21c 7 hours ago (Edited)
District of Criminals
Diablo Corona
Washingtonians are for the most part the spawn of Satan.
DC= the Devil's City... they are evil... Washingtonians are just pure rotten evil...
Washington DC ... Devil's City
Washington DC .... Devil's Crown
The evil ones cannot change their evil ways... they're too far gone... the evil ones cannot
be redeemed...
LorDampNuts 7 hours ago
Keep sending your donations to Stop the Steal, Trump has a plan and will be sworn in by
April when it warms up. Free Chumptard hat with every $100 donation.
Occams_Razor_Trader 7 hours ago
I'd donate a hunny for you to flush your head in a toilet ...............
foxenburg 7 hours ago
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Rammbock 7 hours ago
Republicans are great actors
Kotwica 44 7 hours ago
This guy speaks truth, but, no one gives a flying fu<k.
Ajax_USB_Port_Repair_Service_ 7 hours ago
Attention Secret Police: We've got one for you!
freedommusic 7 hours ago (Edited)
Whatever these folks say is irrelevant. They are all sitting on foreign soil. The UNITED
STATES CORPORATION is a foreign Municipal entity owned by China claimed in the recent
bankruptcy settlement. POTUS said when he was leaving. Go ahead, take it. The buildings, the
chairs, statues, it's all yours . Anyone who steps outside of that foreign jurisdiction will be
entering American soil and subject to the Laws of the United States Constitutional Republic and
prosecuted for treason and sedition.
DC is now a Chinese embassy.
I wonder how much food they have stocked up in there? I would presume the military would
uphold a blockade and prevent the exchange of trade from occurring into a surrounded hostile
territory of the enemy.
YOU WANT IT
YOU GOT IT
HAVE A NICE DAY
SERReal1 7 hours ago
Where was Rand in calling out the election fraud?
Now he is acting all tough again on the deep state creatures.
9.1ontherichterscale 7 hours ago (Edited)
He wants to stay in office. No way is going to touch the third rail. None of them will.
rkb100100 7 hours ago
This is part of a Punch and Judy show put on for retards.
leodogma1 7 hours ago
And yet not one peep of this Quislings tie's to the Chinese Communist party of Evil !
Southern Discomfort 7 hours ago
I'm sure it will be blamed on an action taken by Trump and the only cure will be
intervention. Maybe Joetard can set up a new cabinet level position to seek out opportunities
for new wars.
More-Cowbell 8 hours ago
The show must go on. As if these asz clowns ( all of them ) matter.
north_hand_demon 8 hours ago
Whatever. Your cushy lifestyle, and mine, exists because we're the dominant imperial power
on the planet. Might makes right. Paul knows it too; this is just virtue signaling.
artless 7 hours ago (Edited)
And in your statement lies the real problem with the vast majority of people in this
country.
Yeah I edited the lame ad hom line after I read a few comments. But perhaps it is long due
that rather than simply accept things as the way they are and calling any opposition to it the
thoughts of a ten year old, it might be high time to actually try to make a change in how
people think and ultimately behave.
"... "We will never give up. We will never concede, it doesn't happen. You don't concede when there's theft involved", ..."
"... "We will never give up. We will never concede, it just doesn't happen." ..."
"... " Biden's America Would Be A Dystopian Hellhole ", ..."
"... Trump has not signed the Insurrection Act. ..."
"... 'trust the plan' is a never ending story psyop ..."
"... 'best is yet to come' .. ..."
"... to beam back to the mothership. ..."
"... the humans are out to get them ..."
"... it happening you watch just donate ..."
"... without symptoms. ..."
"... Amnesty run by US State Department representatives, funded by convicted financial criminals, and threatens real human rights advocacy worldwide. ..."
"... Yes yes yes – as if we didn't fucking know! ..."
"... YOU MEAN TO DESTROY THE NHS AND YOU WILL REPEAT THIS OVER AND OVER AND OVER UNTIL IT IS DONE! ..."
The Trump Era is over after the incumbent announced in the day after
Wednesday's storming of the US Capitol that "My focus now turns to ensuring a smooth, orderly
and seamless transition of power", which was widely interpreted by friends and foes alike as
the tacit concession that he previously promised never to provide a little more than 24 hours
prior during his speech at the
Save America Rally .
At that event, he literally said that "We will never give up. We will never concede, it
doesn't happen. You don't concede when there's theft involved", yet completely changed his
tune following the day's tumultuous events and after mysteriously "going dark" for over 24
hours, during which time some speculate that he was forced by his enemies in the permanent
military, intelligence, and diplomatic bureaucracies (" deep state ") to give
up the fight.
BETRAYING HIS BASE
This totally devastated his supporters who elected him primarily
for the purpose of executing his chief promise to "drain the swamp" that all of them so
deeply despise. They truly believed that he could irreversibly effect significant long-term
change to the way that America is run, something which Trump himself also sincerely thought he
could do as well, but he ultimately lacked the strength time and again to take the decisive
steps that were necessary in order to do so.
Thus, he ended up getting swallowed by the same "swamp" that he attempted to drain, which is
licking its lips after feasting on the political carcass that he's since become as a result of
his capitulation. For as much hope as he inspired in his supporters and the respect that many
of them still have for him, most of them are profoundly disappointed that he gave up and didn't
go down fighting.
That's not to say that the vast majority of them expected him to forcefully resist Biden's
impending inauguration, but just that they never thought they'd see the day where he publicly
capitulated after carefully cultivating such a convincing reputation among them as a fighter
who literally said a little more than 24 hours prior that "We will never give up. We will
never concede, it just doesn't happen."
This prompted an ongoing soul-searching process among the most sober-minded of them who
aren't indoctrinated with the cultish Q-Anon claims that Trump still has a so-called "master
plan" that he's preparing to implement after this latest "5D chess" move. It's over, the Trump
Era has ended, and the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement that he inspired is now at
risk of being declared a "
domestic terrorist " organization in the coming future.
TRUMP'S MOST FATAL POLITICAL
MISCALCULATION
" Biden's America Would Be A
Dystopian Hellhole ", like the author predicted a few months ago, and all of Trump's
supporters know that. Some had already resigned themselves to its seeming inevitability after
his efforts to legally reverse the contested results of the latest elections failed for a
variety of reasons that most of them attribute to the "swamp's" corruption, but they
nevertheless remained as positive as possible after having believed that their hero would go
down with them to the end.
None ever thought twice about his promise to "never give up, never concede", and they even
expected him to have to be escorted from the White House on 20 January, yet his tacit
concession is forcing many of them to re-evaluate their views about him in hindsight. Not only
is he going out with a whimper on the "deep state's" terms, but he never fully "drained the
swamp".
Trump's most fatal political miscalculation is that he thought that he could change the
system from the "inside-out" after symbolically -- yet importantly, not substantively -- taking
control of it as America's first modern-day "outsider" President. He immediately switched from
an "outsider" to an "insider" shortly after his inauguration by capitulating to the "deep
state's" demands that he fire former National Security Advisor Flynn, which was his "original
sin" that paved the way for all that would later follow.
Trump the self-professed "deal-maker" thought that he could strike a "compromise" with his
enemies through these means, but all that he did was embolden them to intensify their fake
news-driven efforts to oust him and continue sabotaging him from within through many of the
same "swamp" creatures that he naively continued to surround himself with.
RINOS + MSM =
TRUMP'S DEFEAT
The most reviled among them in the eyes of his base is "Javanka", the popular portmanteau of
Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and his daughter Ivanka. He continued listening to these
"Republicans In Name Only", or RINOs as many MAGA members describe them, as well as many others
such as those who still sit in Congress but pretended to be his friend just to win
re-election.
Furthermore, the influence that his former reality TV career had on him resulted in Trump
remaining obsessed with how his enemies might malign him in the Mainstream Media (MSM) for any
decisive moves that he took to smash the "deep state". This weakness of character proved to be
his greatest personal flaw since he should have followed his instincts instead of submitting to
the egoistic desire to be "liked" by his foes.
So influenced was he by the MSM that his enemies were able to employ the most basic
"reverse-psychology" tricks to manipulate him into "playing it safe" in his struggle against
the "deep state". They fearmongered since even before he entered office that he'd turn into a
so-called "dictator", yet he never seriously contemplated any such authoritarian moves in that
direction despite always having the possibility of utilizing the immense powers vested in him
by the Constitution to do so if he sincerely wanted.
His MAGA supporters passionately pleaded that he should have turned into his enemies' worst
nightmare by declaring at least limited martial law in response to the decades-long Hybrid War
of Terror on America finally going kinetic last summer after Antifa and "Black Lives
Matter" (BLM) orchestrated nationwide riots to oust him.
TRUMP'S THREE GREATEST
FAILURES
Bewildering his base, Trump also failed to revoke Article 230 despite now-proven fears that
it would empower Big Tech to censor him and
his supporters , nor did he thwart the Democrats' mail-in ballot and Dominion voting system
schemes which they argue ultimately led to them stealing the election.
Just as concerning was his decision to not stop the Democrat Governors from locking down
their populations for political reasons under the convenient pretext of COVID-19. The author
addressed all of these issues in his analysis published shortly after the election about why "
The Anti-Trump Regime
Change Sequence Is Worthwhile Studying ". Trump could have legally exercised
near-"dictatorial" powers to avert all of this and thus save America as his supporters see it,
yet time and again he failed to gather the strength needed to do so due to his deep personal
flaws.
THE HYBRID WAR ON AMERICA IS OVER
While Trump was unquestionably victimized by the "deep state" during his entire time in
office, he's no longer as much of a martyr as he used to be after suddenly giving up the fight
following Wednesday's storming of the US Capitol. He surrendered to the shock of his base, was
subsequently swallowed by the "swamp", and is now being mercilessly destroyed in an ominous
sign of what awaits the rest of the MAGA movement in the Biden-Kamala era.
Had he gone down fighting to the end and "never gave up" like he promised, then it would be
an altogether different story, but instead his over-hyped "deal-making" instincts got the best
of him at the very last minute and he foolishly thought that he could save himself by
capitulating to their demands. The "deep state" is now showing their "thanks" by censoring him
from social media and pushing for his impeachment.
The MAGA movement always believed that the country has already been at "war" for years even
though most couldn't articulate the hybrid nature of it like the author did in his piece last
summer about how " The Hybrid War Of Terror
On America Was Decades In The Making ".
They truly felt that Trump shared their threat assessment after he was viciously attacked by
the "deep state" from the second that he stepped onto the campaign trail, but it turned out
that he underestimated the threat even though his enemies never did. To the "deep state" and
their public Democrat proxies, this was always a "war" in its own way, which they never shied
away from expressing.
The supreme irony is that while Trump lambasted the "weak Republicans" in his Save America
Rally speech, he himself ultimately epitomized that very same weakness by later
surrendering.
THE "DEEP STATE" WON
His opponents know no limits and believe in classic Machiavellian fashion that "the ends
justify the means", whereas he thought that he could play by the rules -- and not even all of
them as was early explained by pointing out his refusal to employ the near-"dictatorial" powers
vested in him by the Constitution -- and still come out on top.
His naïveté will go down in history since it's what's most directly responsible
for him failing to fully recognize the seriousness of the "deep state's" no-holds-barred war on
him and the rest of America.
As a born-and-raised New Yorker, Trump perfected the art of slick talking, so much so that
he even managed to dupe his base into believing that he shared their threat assessment about
the decades-long Hybrid War of Terror on America. They fell for this charade since they
desperately wanted to believe that there was still some hope left.
There isn't, though, since the war is over and the "deep state" won once and for all. The "
Great Reset "/"
Fourth Industrial Revolution " brought about by
World War C is
barreling forward at full speed ahead, and practically every domestic accomplishment that Trump
has to his name will likely be reversed by Biden-Kamala during their first year in office,
especially since the "deep state's" Democrat proxies control all branches of government now
(remembering that the Supreme Court's supposed "conservative supermajority" really just
consists of RINOs as was proven by their refusal to hear his team's convincing election fraud
cases).
In fact, the only real "master plan" was that of the "deep state", which effectively
thwarted every one of Trump's moves and ultimately turned his supporters' "last hurrah" of a
mostly peaceful rally into the nail that'll now be hammered into the MAGA movement's
coffin.
It's extremely suspicious that the US Capitol was so poorly defended despite there being an
ongoing session of Congress on such an historic day and after weeks of preparation to ensure
the site's safety ahead of Trump's long-planned Save America March.
It's even more baffling that some of the police officers removed
the barricades and even
opened the doors to some of the protesters, which in hindsight suggests that the "deep
state" wanted to tempt the most "overly passionate" among them (to say nothing of suspected
provocateurs) into storming the site as the pretext for what followed.
The whole point in passively facilitating this scenario through the masterful exploitation
of crowd psychology was to lay the basis for a comprehensive nationwide crackdown against the
MAGA movement on the grounds that it's now "proven" to be a "domestic terrorist" group.
That explains the push behind impeaching Trump less than two weeks before he himself
acknowledged just the other day that he'll be leaving office after ensuring the "transition of
power".
Had he not surrendered, then he probably would still be a martyr to most of the MAGA
movement, but now he's just a palace hostage awaiting his highly publicized political execution
as the opening salvo of the "deep state's" Democrat-driven reprisals against his supporters in
the name of "defending against domestic terrorism". That, not whatever Q-Anon imagines, is the
real "master plan", and it succeeded.
CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
Trump was swallowed by the "swamp" because he lacked the strength to drain it. Every MAGA
member needs to accept this harsh truth no matter how painful it might be. Time and again, he
failed to muster up the strength needed to meaningfully fulfill what many sincerely believed to
be his destiny.
This was due to his fatal political miscalculation of transforming from an "outsider" into
an "insider" in a doomed-to-fail attempt to change the system from within. He continued relying
on RINOs despite their proven unreliability. Trump's obsession with how his foes portrayed him
in the MSM also led to him never seriously countenancing the use of the near-"dictatorial"
powers vested in him by the Constitution to save America.
He pathetically surrendered after the "deep state's" "master plan" succeeded, and now he
can't even go down in history as a martyr.
Originally published on One World Press Jan
20, 2021 2:08 PM
Trump was part of the show nothing more nothing less. They had the goods on him for decades.
He made Izzrail grate again. That was about it. Notice Jizzlaid Maxwell, the Mossad kiddy
victim procurer watching her mark in the background of the video below from 92 as the king of
bankruptcy eyes the broads and "struts" his stuff.
Meanwhile Kill Bill Gates gets to poison Planet Sheeple and nobody ever questions his
association with Mossad kiddy porn snuff director, Epstein or Kill Bill's sojourns on Pedovore
Island. Anyone remember the CIA Operation Brownstone"? It's global and it's Satanic.
How could Trum 'drain the swamp' when he lives in the swamp. contributes to the swamp and
essentially is part of the swamp.
This story is sh!te. Trump is a swamp dweller.
Trump is just the same as all the other oligarchs and would be oligarchs. He is a rich,
privileged, white entrepreneur. His propaganda campaign in which he claimed to be on the side
of the poor and unemployed whites is just about the biggest lie which has been swallowed
wholesale since Goebbles was whitewashing the Nazi regime.
How you fools here can fall for this tripe has me absolutely beat.
Aethelred , Jan 13, 2021 10:17 AM
Trump in his political ineptitude resembles Jimmy Carter, an idealist incapable of
wielding power. Neither man had the gumption, nor the charisma (much the same thing) to win
over the apparatchiki. Both vain and selfish men (like all politicians), neither inspired
sufficient love nor fear to gather support, unlike Reagan or Clinton, both of whom exuded
calm confidence. Trump differs from Carter in that Trump's social incapacity manifests in
bombast, and Carter's in staged humility. Neither could convince the ruling classes, and so
were ushered away.
The elevation of Biden, an aged hack, is a signal the republic is finally overturned. The
feds not only can convict but now can elect and govern through a ham sandwich.
Blather , Jan 13, 2021 8:21 AM
Does the author know how to read Trump's speech or is he so BIAS as not to see?
Trump DID NOT capitulate. Read careFOOLY. It can go both waze.
ZenPriest , Jan 12, 2021 8:50 PM
Trump was never going to drain the swamp. He was a clown put in place by America's
masters, to keep an endless supply of material for their media and to stir up hatred among
citizens.
It's funny because citizens should be uniting against the puppeteers. Or they would be if
they knew they even existed, or knew they were being played.
S Cooper , Jan 13, 2021 2:47 AM Reply to
ZenPriest
"Quite a number already know this. That number keeps growing with each passing day. Got
Debs?"
"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and
I'm here to help." Remember that line? That was Ronnie Raygun back in 1986, with one of his
(or his ghost writers') versions for 'draining the swamp' then, getting government off our
backs, and blah, blah, blah. Agitprop thrown the masses so the corporate state could get down
to bizzness as usual in dispossessing 'we the people' by rolling back government programs for
social welfare and building up wealth and power for elites via the MIC and Wall Street
(complementary to Iron Bitch Thatcher's neoliberal programs for a greater fascism in
Britain).
Hardly anything original, such marketing ads. Politricking fronts of the ruling class have
been campaigning before and after getting into office with noble lies of populism covering
for their brands of treachery as long as the fraudulence of capitalist democracy and
representative government have been around. In the post-WWII era of Pox Americana, the U$
CEOs for the Fortune 500 routinely have disguised their institutional role in managing the
empire under cover of brands of reform that keep promising power to the people with one hand
while taking it away with the other.
But when it comes to the greatest show on earth, it's the words attributed to P.T. Barnum
that there's a sucker born every minute (or at least every election season) which ring
truest. So now we've got the ringmasters retiring the Donald and installing good ole Creepy
Joe to 'build back better' on behalf of the Great Reset. That's after Swamp Thang has played
his part as dictator of distraction overseeing such achievements as the greatest robbery of
the commons in human history and launch of technofascism under Operation Warp(ed) Speed, all
thanks to a global coup with which he's been entirely complicit. And his manufactured base of
true believers still carry on with the covidiocy as much as the controlled opposition of the
faux left.
The more things change, the more they stay the same (only worse!).
Chris , Jan 12, 2021 5:14 PM
The Q group are patriots with access to a quantum computer able to untangle timelines from
a possibility/probability vortex.
Their movement was designed to awaken many individuals with key roles to play in the real
Operation Warpspeed.
The majority of these folks had some connection to the military or other branches of
government including the police.
In 2012 nearly all technology, ancient or more modern, was suddenly rendered non
functional.
The Mayans were obviously dead right with their calender.
The race was on to gain absolute supremacy in the prediction game.
All major stakeholders have access to quantum computing, but the US has the upper hand.
The true value of quantum computers lies not in the task of pure number crunching, but in its
ability to predict probabilities of complex situations.
The quantum computer exposes the most probable timelines and delivers the results in
numerical form that correspond to actual events and dates/times .
Igby MacDavitt , Jan 12, 2021 3:43 PM
"The only kinds of fights worth fighting are those you're going to lose, because somebody
has to fight them and lose and lose and lose until someday, somebody who believes as you do
wins."
― I.F. Stone
Laurence Howell , Jan 12, 2021 12:42 PM
President Trump has declared a State of Emergency in the District of Columbia.
White House
OW look the fruitcakes and cult follower spent another new moon being juiced , Trump
has not signed the Insurrection Act. BUT BUT BUT
Cult of BIG disclosure keep watching.donate huge Arrests and stay tuned keep watching
it happening – keep watching- it happening soon, BIG disclosure huge Arrests . it
Happening soon psyop AND distraction
Simple simon and Q nonsense told another lie to the sheep
Laurence Howell , Jan 12, 2021 12:16 PM
President Trump has signed the Insurrection Act.
YouDontCareAboutGrandma , Jan 12, 2021 12:47 PM Reply to
Laurence Howell
Proof? And don't link to Simon Parkes' YouTube channel. He's provided no evidence
whatsoever for his claims. He says he talks to aliens and "Q" on the telephone.
Gosh, evrn more baffling and scarey and reminescent of 1963, never seen footage of the
murder of Ms. BABBIT showing collusion between police and antifa agitators, taken by an
independent Japanese reporter!
Great article but consider how many thousands of people the Islamist extremist, Erdogan of
Turkey, had to fire and imprison, to dismantle the positive Deep State structure Attaturk put
in place to keep that country secular? Functioned admirably for many years.
DimlyGlimpsed , Jan 12, 2021 1:06 AM
Dems enthusiatically voted from Bill Clinton, Obama, Hillary and Biden. All corrupt and
compromised. Repubs voted for Bush Jr., Romney, and Trump. All corrupt and compromised. Both
accuse the other of corruption, dishonesty and hypocrisy. Both are right, of course.
Reality, though, is not possible to perceive when limited to a diet of mainstream news.
Neither is it a trivial task to navigate the rough seas online disinformation.'
Unless one is privy to big-picture high-level (and secret) information, one is left to
attempt to identify and assemble a complex jigsaw puzzle using one's own sleuthing and
intuition skills.
Common people without inside knowledge can still interpret the world, however. War is evil,
and those who advocate war have been seduced by evil. Kindness and generosity are among the
highest values. On the other hand, those who are selish and cruel pollute our world. Etc,,
etc.
Let us keep in mind that the most evil cloak themselves in the garb of peace, kindness and
generosity, in order to dine on sheep who wishfully and willfully refused to judge behavior
rather than be seduced with addictive slogans. Let us also keep in mind that no leaders can
remain in power without the compliance of the rest of us.
Any of should be able to recognize Joe Biden as evil. His "track record" is one of
corruption, budget cutting, war and authoritarian legislation. And Trump? One of the great
mysteries of human civilization is that Trump, the ultimate swap creature, was elected by
promising to "clean the swamp".
That is fairly accurate but Trump did push back against America's China Class and the CCP
-- more than you can say for commies like the Bidens, Obamas, Clintons, Bushes, etc.
Trump's America First Hoax: Trump is an Israeli agent. He put #Mossad asset #JaredKushner
in charge of infiltration of US Intelligence and Defense. Bidens are Chinese agents? Charles
Kushner (Jared's father), is an agent of #AnbangInsurance, a Chinese Communist front
group.
Jams O'Donnell , Jan 13, 2021 6:54 PM Reply to
REvail
All US presidents, vice-presidents, chiefs of staff, etc are Israeli agents, or more
accurately, are in effect the same thing.
Jams O'Donnell , Jan 13, 2021 6:53 PM Reply to
Sgt_doom
"commies like the Bidens, Obamas, Clintons, Bushes, etc."
If you think that the above mentioned capitalist clowns are "commies", then you really,
REALLY, need to get an education, because clearly you don't know your arse from your
elbow.
Igby MacDavitt , Jan 12, 2021 3:46 PM Reply to
DimlyGlimpsed
"Trump, the ultimate swap creature " I do not think you have any idea what the 'swamp' is
to make such a claim.
Otherwise, a great post.
Lost in a dark wood , Jan 12, 2021 12:40 AM
Note: I drafted this as a response, but the person is not worthy of a reply, so I'll post
it here instead.
--
I've always said that Q is a deep-state operation. It's the NSA, military intelligence,
etc. It's just a different deep state to the CIA/MI6 deep state. And I've always said that
people should at least know what "the plan" is. They should know what it is because it's by
far the most coherent explanation for what is happening now, and for what has happened over
the last four years.
A couple of years ago I thought a deal had been struck between the opposing factions, and
it was all going to be wound down. But I changed that view after the Covid911, attempted
colour revolution. The overwhelming view on this site, from contributors and posters, was
that Trump would fall in June 2020. I was one of only a handful of people saying Trump would
survive.
I can't predict the details of what's happening now, but I think Trump will survive this
because:
a) he has the ammunition
b) it would make no sense to go this far and not see it through
c) even though it seems to be going to the precipice, it still fits a coherent plan
I've only recently started following Simon Parkes, but in his latest update he claims to
have spoken to the real Q. Of course, as anybody who's been following Q posts would know,
this would breach the "no outside comms" principle.
I'm not at all impressed. Appeared on the scene coincidental with Gen McInerney and all
the misinformation about "hammer and scorecard" which was a blatant distraction from clear
and convincing evidence of election fraud.
Parkes does far too much, "I could have told you beforehand but then I'd have had to kill
you."
Your on the ball wow from 1 psyop to another Now your following simon charlatan
parkes.
HE gets excepted into the Q nonsense and trump Savior psyop and becames one of there star
leaders over night.
Do you not do basic checks on who you start to worship?? or do they have to say code words
like Q and trump maga and its like there chosen to lead you.
Negative, far too silly and cartoonish and tracks back to a Filipino Maoist group directed
by the CCP!
Asylum , Jan 11, 2021 7:34 PM
We've been manipulated into fighting against each other over trivial differences to divert
us from the fact that we're all in the same boat.
Lost in a dark wood , Jan 11, 2021 6:33 PM
Andrew Korybko: "That, not whatever Q-Anon imagines, is the real "master plan", and it
succeeded."
Okay, I'm trying to figure this out. With regard specifically to this thread, are we
allowed to post direct links to Q posts? For instance, Q has stated explicitly that there is
no "Qanon" (#4881). Instead, there is Q and there are anons. I personally think this is
debatable, and that Qanon is a collective name for a highly amorphous movement and method of
enquiry. Furthermore, that movement and method predates Q and was to some extent co-opted by
Q. The movement will also outlive Q, though it may retain the name. As a movement, Qanon
stands in opposition to the hierarchical, hive-mind vacuity of the Rationalists and
Neo-Platonists. In short, Qanon is Blakean. Welcome to Jerusalem!
We do not want either Greek or Roman models if we are but just & true to our own
imaginations, those Worlds of Eternity in which we shall live forever; in Jesus our Lord.
– William Blake https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Milton_(excerpts)/Preface
Q Alerts is back up so I'll try again. The following is a critical part of "the plan".
--
Q (Oct 17, 2020):
I'm going to bring the whole diseased, corrupt temple down on your head. It's gonna be
Biblical.
Enjoy the show! https://qalerts.app/?n=4884
Please – can we have more of Andrew Karybko. I've seen him on Peter Lavelle. For
such an acutely well informed young chap about international politics, he demonstrates an
equally rigorous understanding about Trumps psyche.
Andrew Korybko is probably one of the best geo-political analysts I've come across and his
depth of knowledge across all continents shines through. A very warm and engaging person.
He runs a site called OneWorld Press. Recently accused by mainstream media and The Daily
Beast of being GRU agents. Well if it is, they are most measured and balanced in the history
of intelligence services.
Your be saying that on the way to the concentration camps!!! 'trust the plan' is a never ending story psyop
Similar to the 'best is yet to come' ..
you trumpsters have your own Down Syndrome language.
WWG1WGA, another bunch of devotees similar to a cult who will not except there guru is a
oppressor
mikael , Jan 11, 2021 1:09 PM
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the
things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference."Reinhold Niebuhr
Pardon moi for the lenght.
I dont know whats with people this days, the shere avalange of bollocks is baffling, the
inability to conect the dots to what was, the past, to the present is making me think there
must be something, hehe, with the narrative, or should we say in this uh . conpiracy tinfoil
hat wearing days, in the tap water, and the rethotic, about Trump, I have my issues, and I
have never been quiet about them, but then to whine about things when most of it have been
inplace before Trump came into the WH, incl children in gages to wars, Obamalama started more
wars than any other American president ever, with Hitlary the Beast from Little Rock beside,
after Her husband stole Social sec and now, witch could be massive, is completely eradicated
out of existence, and the sactions, etc, most of them are just continuations of existing
systems, we can always blame Trump for something, but please, do know the difference and dont
just throw bollocks because of the people whom wanted change, when Obamalama said it, you
belived, and what happened, again, he pissed upon you all, and have since laughed all the way
to the bank, the economic crashes, the insane austeritys, the bailins and outs, you name it
to color revolutions.
This isnt to defend Trump, for me, He was more an castrat, singing but otherwise balless, but
also tied, unable to move, and been relentlessly attacked by those that defenses the past
witch in no way was better.
Then we have the eh .. storming?, and if you look at videos, what sticks out is, what
storming, some gass clouds, yea, means what, an Cop throving an gass can, but take an look
for your self, it was never in any way what the MSM wants you to belive, and the army of
people crawling all over the sites wants you to persive, along with profanitys about people
whom did suported Trump, because they hoped for change, you cant attack them, maybe for been
a bit naive, but one thing shal be the thing Trump did, exposed them all, in an way witch is
unpresedented despite His flaws, nobody have done that in this level, He exposed them all,
and if you havent gotten it yet, you have an problem, nobody else, incl the people whom did
their duty as free citizens of the USA, did the protesting.
Rioting, again, what riot, the worst thing I can come up with, after watching some videos, is
minore, a window, probably by the AntiFags/BLMs/eh leftards?, and one man whom ran off with
an piece of the furiture, nothing else, and if I drag that further, maybe the stormers should
have wiped their shoos off before entering the Hill, stepping on the fine carpets on the
floor in the hallway, what an horrible crime, right.
What storming, do you see anything, do enlighten us.
So, I know I am pushing the attention span to the limit.
BUT, I have thru the years found out that Americans, not that I want to call em stupid, but
regarding world poltics, more infantile, naive, brainwashed to such an extent thru the
decades/centurys of propaganda, where the various Gov always have had an enemy, it have
variated, from muslims etc to what it have become to day, domestic terrorism aka
conservatives whatever that means, and not only in the MSM but also thru an army of so called
Alternative MSM, witch have feed upon this narratives and played upon this, but overall, gone
the same erant as the Gov wanted them to go, and witch have resulted in wars upon wars, and
stil some want more wars, like the broad attack line on Iran, just to give you one ex to the
strangling of others, like western sahara to the Palestinians.
Then we have the new enemy, in mainly the so called alternative ugh .. rightwinged? whatever
whom sommehow manages to blame everything on socialism, yea, apart from the weather because
thats Putins fault, despite that, I found Putin to be an scoundrel, the Russian Gov rotten to
its core, that dont mean I hate Russians but there will always be those that cant
differentiate at all.
Whom is the "enemy" Americans, socialism, China, Russia, Iran, huh.
I have saxed this from P. L. Gonzalez.
Social media networks, payment processors, airlines, hotels, streaming services, and online
vendors are strangling people based on ideology but TPUSA is still complaining about
"socialism." Burn your money or donate it to TPUSA, it's the same thing.
Yup, briliantly summarised everything in some few lines, and why, do you refuse to see
them when they are right infront of your very own eyes, and yet, you blame some imaginary
enemy witch have nothing to do with this coup, its an class war, its the oligarcs, the robber
barons, witch have an army of buttspreaders in the capitol Hill to their abuse, and this
bitches do whatever they are told, do notice how the RepubliCONs threw you under the buss, is
that to the Chines fault.
So, I hope the Americans whom stil have some parts of their bran fuctional, can notice the
difference, in Norway we have the same problem, but we are an so called socialistic nation,
but we are held hostages by the same pack of scums that is plundering your nation and
resources, and have nothing but contempt for everyone of us, and an Gov that do whatever they
want and whom are we then to blame, the Hottentots, Maoris, communism is an tool for social
unrest, and when they have done their job, thrown under the buss, because the PTB wants us to
fight each others, as long we do, they will win.
Unite and you have an chanse, if not, well, I am old, and my life span expectanse isnt that
long anymore and I will not have to live in the totalistaian regime that comes, but the sole
reason for me to even bother, is for our children, and their children.
And to all of you whom went to the protest, you have my deepest respect.
It truly is an war, against the dark forces.
You all need to take an stand.
Be the light.
peace
Igby MacDavitt , Jan 12, 2021 3:53 PM Reply to
mikael
We have the same problem worldwide. Singling out and scorning the Americans is simply
divisive. It has always been the People against the Oppressors. The Americans are people and
have Oppressors bearing down on them like the rest of us. There is a cancer that needs to be
removed lest it devour us all.
Chris , Jan 11, 2021 10:57 AM
The overtone of Korybko's writing is excessively defeatist. When the "Deep State" applies
such overt tools to steal the U.S. election, imposes censorship, labels millions of American
citizens as potential "domestic terrorists", silences the still incumbent U.S. President,
resorts to provocation, deprives Americans of essential liberties through Covid, curfews or
other bogus emergencies, then it means that the establishment behind the "Deep State" is
scared. Scared not as much of Donald Trump as scared of You – the People. I know it
since I live in a central European country with a very bitter experiences with dicatorship.
When the power starts to resort to an open forgery and uses coercion or force it reveals its
weakness, not strength. Its power derives only from the passive attitude of majority of
population, nothing more. What this so called 'liberal elite' in America hopes for is to
return to the good old days, when the whole Middle America remained voiceless, silent,
isolated, without any leadership or political representation. Now it is their objective to
'legally' separate the 'progressive America' from the 'populist' one and they might even
inspire separation, violence or secessionist moves to achieve it. But MAGA movement must not
play this delusional vision of retreat to entrench in false sense of local security. That's
what the 'Deep State' wants to achieve – to herd the popular opposition into their home
arrests and their privacy soon to be possibly separated by walls, sanitary wards, wired
fences or a new Indian reservation. Americans would never win their Independence by acting in
defense only, by retreating to 'wait and see' tactics as Korybko suggests. What must be done
is to recapture Your state institutions that have been stolen and turned into a travesty of
American political tradition. Before that happens a common awareness is needed that those who
appear to rule as a new 'government' are just a tiny bunch of criminals who try to impress
the whole world that their power has no limits, that they monopolised the mass media and
economy, that they are invincible. Do not let this delusion of 'Deep State' victory to
dominate Your outlook. Yes, I agree that Trump failed as a leader in a time of crisis but
MAGA (or however we call it) but all the people who really care for America need to maintain
representation, authority and leadership. They shouldn't accept a comfortable fantasy that
sooner or later the 'Deep State' would crumble under its own weight and then by some miracle
a new movement would be born. If Trump indicates that 'its only the beginning' then his
supporters should join him in any action he offers. All Republican politicians, conservative
or libertarian societies, local communities, state legislatures or any other active group
must be engaged in this action. Struggle for political freedom always involves risk and
mistakes. Trump certainly made a lot of them. But it is the People who are sovereign, not any
office, institution or technological dicatorship. When the Constitution, the congressional
debate and civil liberties are ruined by 'elite' it is the responsibility of the People to
act in emergency to restore law, order and liberty. The 'Deep State' perfectly understands
that after the four years of Trump and the emergence of trumpism as a social-political fact
there can not be any turning back to the business as usual. Not under normal and peaceful
circumstances. That's why they are so frightened and act in panic. That's why they impose
health and security 'emergencies' to incapacitate the population, to make it superfluous and
useless. We saw it in totalitarian regimes.
The world needs the U.S. not as an imperial power but as an example of well established
social contract, human liberty and hope for a better future. The European 'elites' are in
revolt against their people too but here we won't have a chance for any anti-establishment
president to support us. That's why in Europe we still believe that not all has been lost in
America.
Laurence Howell , Jan 11, 2021 12:17 PM Reply to
Chris
Lt. General Thomas Mcinerney,
"special forces imbedded in Antifa rioters have Nancy Pelosi's laptop"
laptop always the laptop it on the laptop he/she left the laptop at
it etc etc et was found there# etc etc etc bullshit
laptop psyop used as much as the immaculate passport psyop found at the scene of crime in a
burning inferno it aimed at idiots
Laurence Howell , Jan 12, 2021 10:37 AM Reply to
Asylum
Are you saying that Hunter Biden's laptop and the released information that it contains is
of no value?
Conflating 911 with the current conspiracies is not helpful. This would need an article of
longer length and written by an unbiased observer which you are not.
Instead of saying etc. etc. bullshit, why not explain why this is your position?
Or does this not fit in with your soundbite posting?
Jacques , Jan 11, 2021 9:41 AM
Historically speaking, the problem with the "deep state" is essentially that the current
system has corrupted itself to a point where it is so far from what is claimed, or perhaps
appears to be, that there is no way to fix it from within by rebuilding it, by "draining the
swamp".
Klaus "Cockroach" Schwab et al understand this, hence the Great Reset, a new vision for
the future. Of course, they want a future for themselves, but that's another story.
Even if Trump were entirely sincere in his effort to "drain the swamp", he had nothing to
offer apart from some vague anachronistic concept of Making America Great Again. What the
fuck is that supposed to mean anyway, eh? The only thing he had behind him was populism which
in itself is an empty concept.
Like it or not, a change will only come if people formulate a new philosophy, ideology,
and if the new ideology is proposed and embraced on a broad scale. Ideally in a non-violent
fashion.
Right now, there is fuck all, people are still stuck on all sorts of left-right bullshit
dichotomies, (fake) democracy, the games that have been played for decades if not hundreds of
years.
If you ask me, it would be nice if the ideology of the future was loosely based on Hayek's
spontaneous order.
If Trump can pull something off this week or early next, the new plan is already waiting
in the wings. It's called Nesara/Gesara. It's a new economic system not based on a debt based
system.
rechenmacher , Jan 12, 2021 3:45 PM Reply to
Thom1111
Heard that one before. Fraud.
Thom1111 , Jan 12, 2021 7:09 PM Reply to
rechenmacher
It's a real framework plan, it's just whether it can be implemented is the question.
Igby MacDavitt , Jan 12, 2021 3:57 PM Reply to
Jacques
"Like it or not, a change will only come if people formulate a new philosophy, ideology,
and if the new ideology is proposed and embraced on a broad scale. Ideally in a non-violent
fashion."
Sure. So we the people have had centuries or more to figure the answer out. Repeating the
dilemma is not enlightening. Idealism has no voice with tyrants.
ZenPriest , Jan 11, 2021 8:53 AM
All this talk of the 'deep state' yet no one can name them. Lol.
Thom1111 , Jan 11, 2021 3:04 PM Reply to
ZenPriest
you must have been born yesterday. In America it's the alphabet agencies but obviously all
runs back to Rothschild and the Vatican.
In Covid-19 Period, Honest online career from home, Now A Days Scam is every where but
don't worry , every one is not a cheater, very reliable and profitable site. Thousands
peoples are making good earning from it. For further detail visit the link no instant money
required free signup and information
𝚠𝚠𝚠.𝚓𝚘𝚋𝚜𝟷𝟼.𝚝𝚔
The 6 January protest march clearly shows that the majority of Trump voters had already
given up on Trump so did not join the protest. There was originally talk of a possible one
million people attending, it didn't get anywhere close. If half the nation was still behind
Trump, this was a very puzzling showing.
Trump just did not have what it takes, or was not really trying, to ruthlessly cut out the
cancer of corruption in government. History will show that he was a weak leader who allowed
the deep state to distract him to the extent that he never did anything of note other than to
reveal, through no action of his own, how extreme is the corruption that he had promised to
drain.
The Democrat distractions, paid for by their oligarch owners, showed the world that
extreme corruption is running the USA. Even the most loyal Democrats must be puzzled by the
current purges and threats of extreme centralised thought control, the arrogance of the swamp
now that it has gotten rid of the peoples' man.
To his credit, I am still willing to believe that Trump tried to do the right thing.
Although the author is trying to place Trump as a coward who resigned, going back on his
word, I think this is not how his original supporters see him. From what I can see, the
majority of his original supporters still support him and see him as a figurehead, but they
recognise that he doesn't have the skills to do the job. He is not a coward, he did not cave
in, he recognised, probably because of the low protest numbers, that he did not have what is
takes to continue the fight, he could see that his base had already given up on him. He is
still a figurehead in the patriot movement. He may have lost the far right, but he still has
a lot of centre-ground supporters.
I disagree with your claim that the majority of supporters had already given up on him. It
was the middle of the week. People have jobs. It was a significant turn out. People
understand what is at stake. I would not place the blame for failure on Trump. He is amazing
in so many ways.
I just don't understand here how anybody can believe Trump was sincere in wanting to
change anything: he's a narcissistic bully in it for his own benefit and that of his
offspring. Fighting corruption??? Come on!
Igby MacDavitt , Jan 12, 2021 4:06 PM Reply to
Carmpat
The mere fact that hundreds and hundreds of treasonous actors throughout government and
business have been clearly and openly revealed through the process started by Trump is a damn
good start.
"What is going in DC right now is like what went on at Jonestown after Jim Jones went
crackers. Except instead of cyanide laced Kool-Aid they are going to use 'Doc' Billy Eugenics
EUTHANASIA DEATH SHOT to off the 'faithful'. If only Billy and they would just off themselves
and leave the rest of the World out of it."
" EUTHANIZE the World! Corporate Fascism and Eugenics forever."
"Time now for Na n zi Pelosi, Chuckie 'Upchuck' Schumer and all the rest of the war
criminal gang of CORPORATE FASCIST FABIAN EUGENICISTS to beam back to the
mothership. They see insurrections, rebellions and conspiracies everywhere. They believe
the humans are out to get them . They are going full Jim Jones. "
"Also Nasty Na n zi should lay off the hooch. It is beginning to have a deleterious and
harmful effect upon the sad thing's cognitive faculties and behavior."
Sgt Oddball , Jan 10, 2021 10:35 PM
I *Hope* they name the next Carrier after him – USS Donald J. Trump – CVN
83
😉
Sgt Oddball , Jan 10, 2021 10:38 PM Reply to
Sgt Oddball
- Nickname: – 'Big Don'
Voxi Pop , Jan 10, 2021 9:57 PM
https://worldchangebrief.webnode.com INSURRECTION
ACT "PROBABLY" SIGNED –
Military In Control of the US, Under Commander In Chief Trump/
Updates Will Follow Throughout The Day
Cal , Jan 10, 2021 9:56 PM
.
Sgt Oddball , Jan 10, 2021 9:26 PM
"Captain America's been torn apart,
Now he's a court jester with a broken heart,
He said, "Turn me around and take me back to the start",
"I must be losing my mind!" Are you blind?!
– I've seen it all a *Million Times* "
You are going to be very surprised. See what happens.
David Meredith , Jan 10, 2021 9:08 PM Reply to
Sukma Dyk
I was just about to post a comment saying: It's not over yet, but you beat me to it! Well
done.
John Smith , Jan 11, 2021 6:17 PM Reply to
Sukma Dyk
Why the secrecy? If you know summit then spill.
Jacques , Jan 10, 2021 8:49 PM
I don't know what Trump's intentions were, and I couldn't care less.
From where I'm standing, it appears that he was elected on a wave of populism, which
seemed to be an alternative to the "liberal democracy" fakery, the swamp. An interesting
presentation of that was here ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qA50BE7d1X8
). IMHO, Bannon kicked Frum's butt in that debate.
It would appear that populism was a big enough threat for the "swamp" to unleash four
years of a hate campaign against Trump, possibly, probably culminating with COVID. Hard to
believe that it was a coincidence.
Be it as it may, and allowing for the possibility that this or that or the other thing has
been staged this way or that way, Trump's presidency has certainly set things in motion,
woken up people. Had somebody more slick been elected, the transition to the dystopia that
seems to be in the pipeline would probably have been less noticeable, perhaps not noticeable
at all. With the shitshow that has been going down since last February, all of a sudden there
is a public debate. Perhaps misinformed, perhaps mislead, but there is a debate nevertheless.
Will it result in something positive? Hard to say, hopefully.
Bottom line, Trump's presidency has been historically a good thing.
YouTube_censors_unfortuna , Jan 11, 2021 10:05 AM Reply to
Jacques
Covid 19 was DECIDED? But of course, yes, it's just a detail .. lol
Researcher , Jan 10, 2021 8:45 PM
Turns out the Viking Guy aka QAnon Shaman aka Jake Angeli aka Jacob Anthony Chansley aka
Actor and self proclaimed "Super Soldier" pals around with Bernard Kerik and Rudy Giuliani
when he takes time off from memorizing the latest NSA script:
Lost in a dark wood , Jan 10, 2021 9:42 PM Reply to
Researcher
Oh look, a photo at some sort of book-signing type event. I'll file it alongside the one
of Oswald and Mother Teresa.
Lost in a dark wood , Jan 11, 2021 4:37 PM Reply to
Researcher
BTW: if that's what Bernard Kerik looks like when he's "palling around", you definitely
wouldn't want to fall out with him!
James Meeks , Jan 10, 2021 10:10 PM Reply to
Researcher
Haven't you figured out yet that QAnon is an intelligence agency psyop based in the type
of magical thinking that will get you killed and lose the nation? If not, you really aren't
qualified to participate in what is currently hitting us. The enemy has your number. This is
obviously a photo op staged by the security state to feed the false narrative created around
QAnon.
Researcher , Jan 10, 2021 11:23 PM Reply to
James Meeks
Can you read? Read what I wrote again. Read it enough times until you understand.
QAnon = Q Group NSA
Nothing is hitting you except the Democrats and Republicans together against the citizens.
That's not new.
"If there was a non WAR RACKETEER CORPORATE FASCIST in SHAM DEMOCRACY USA for whom to vote
and the REPUBLICRATS did not FAKE the counts and rig the SHAM elections WE THE PEOPLE might.
Where is a Eugene Victor Debs when the world needs one?"
"Soon that is not going to be an issue, however. There will be no need for SHAM ELECTIONS
after Billy EugenIcs and the CORPORATE FASCIST FABIAN EUGENICISTS cull all the untermenschen
and useless eaters with their EUTHANASIA DEATH SHOT."
"Just can not give up the opportunity for a good lead up (segue'). In good faith and in
all seriousness, thanks for providing it."
Cmiller , Jan 12, 2021 5:27 AM Reply to
Researcher
Masonic handshake
Dayne , Jan 10, 2021 8:40 PM
Peasants in 19th-century Russia clung to a notion of the Czar as a benevolent, fatherly
figure. Even when he rained misery and oppression down on them, it was only because he was
"misinformed", "surrounded by bad guys", etc.
It makes sense: Those were desperate, illiterate people living in misery. Hoping against
hope was all they had. But why would anyone in 2021 think of Trump in essentially the same
way is beyond me. An entrenched military-industrial-media-psychiatric-intelligence system,
hundreds of years in the making and with untold trillions in funding, just stood by as a
Robin-Hood-type hero and people's champion rose to take the Oval Office? Sorry. Trump might
as well sprout wings and fly.
Sgt Oddball , Jan 10, 2021 10:10 PM Reply to
Dayne
Thanx for your comment, Dayne – I've been trying to put this into words, and as I'm
autistic, I could frankly, literally *Sperg'-out* over this, right now
- TL:DR version is this, tho': – Ever wonder why 'Populism' is such a dirty word for
the establishment and their MSM bullhorn? – The argument I've heard thus far generally
goes like the South Park underpants gnome's plan for world domination: – Phase 1:
Popular Uprising (aka: 'Civil Unrest') Phase 2: ? . Phase 3: Fascist 'Strongman' Dictatorship
– Why is that?
- Also that we're *Too Stoopid*(/ie: Self-Absorbed) – Like the Mud-Pickin' peasants
in Monty Python' Holy Grail
- I would suggest 2 reasons for this:
- 1.) The Davostanis (Global Banksters/Oligarchs) never *merely* back the *winning horse*
in the race, – In fact they back *every* horse that they *allow* to run (ergo: Trump
was an Establishment-groomed *Stalking Horse* )
- 2.) The Davostanis (again), have *long since* seen to it that *most everyone*, from
birth onwards, is psychologically conditioned, first with childhood myths and fairy-tales
about Charming Princes and Fair Princesses, then with religio-spiritual 'adult' myths and
fairy-tales about (In Judeo-Christian terms) Messianic, White-Knight champion/rescuer types
who, if *we would only* put our lives and our *Utmost Faith* in their holy, heaven-sent
hands, would *Save Us All* from all the terrible, terrible *Mess We've All Made* for
ourselves down here on Earth, by collectively *Shitting The Bed*
*Obviously*, this is *All* just so much *Childish Nonsense*, and, more to the point, a
*Writ-Large Con-Job*
- Cutting to the chase: – The 'Great-Man' theory of history is *Bunk* – Always
*Has Been*, always *Will Be*
If you're still "Holding Out For A Hero", I invite you to stare *Long And Hard* into the
nearest available mirror, *Take A DEEP Breath*, and then go out and *Elect Yourself* to the
office – *Better Yet*, elect your family, elect your friends, elect your neighbors,
elect *Everyone*
- And then let's *Do This Shit* – *Together*!
James Meeks , Jan 10, 2021 10:23 PM Reply to
Dayne
It could have something to do with the fact that Biden is backed by every billionaire
member of the Davos gang of criminals getting ready to use this event, coupled with medical
martial law, to stage the "great reset" scheme. A wet dream of Malthusian eugenecists like
Faucci & Gates, since it includes a drastic reduction in world population aka genocide of
the elderly, vulnerable, poor and non compliant. This Globalist Technocracy will be led by
un-elected bankers and corporate CEO's effectively ending any form of Democracy planet wide.
MSM mockingbirds are completing the programming of the public to make Casey's statement to
Reagan ring true" We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the
American public believes is wrong."
Ow look Simon one trick pony parkes been laughed at and ridiculed and busted for his many
many many many lies and it happening you watch just donate psyop
gets excepted into the Q nonsense and trump Savior psyop and became s one of there
leaders!!!
doesn't anyone go back 5 years and do basic check on thsoes they watch and then make idols
of them.
fools follow fools
Mike , Jan 10, 2021 8:15 PM
Trump was never going to be Ameica's hero. He was played to depict America as a fascist,
racist, neo-nazi country that needs to be saved by the Left aka Joe Biden/Kamala Harris. The
Left can now "save us all" from the "damage" caused by the MAGA movement and Trump. They can
do this through heavily increased mass surveillance and what is essentially imprisonment, to
make sure that we don't fall victim to the "domestic terrorism" that is represented by Trump
and his fan base.
David Meredith , Jan 10, 2021 9:10 PM Reply to
Mike
saved by the left? The left has been selling out the US to the globalist agenda for the
last 20 years (in power or out). Trump is not finished restoring America to a country that
doesn't sell out to China.
"Left-Center-Right" seems that paradigm is a tad askew. It is more like a top to bottom
pyramid [scheme/racket]. The CORPORATE FASCIST OLIGARCH MOBSTER PSYCHOPATH SLAVE MASTERS
sitting on their gold platinum thrones at the very top of the tower/pyramid and all their
prole slave victims, WE THE PEOPLE (HUMANITY) in the mud at the base. The PSYCHOS will say or
do anything to get the prole slaves at each others throats. IF WE ARE FIGHTING AMONG
OURSELVES WE ARE NOT FIGHTING THEM."
Well, being saved by the left was a sarcastic comment. And Trump is clearly done with
"restoring America" because it was never his to restore, let alone him conceding to the left
after the Capitol "riots".
falcemartello , Jan 11, 2021 3:53 AM Reply to
David Meredith
@ David
The left is as left as my right GONAD
Martin Usher , Jan 10, 2021 10:12 PM Reply to
Mike
Biden/Harris "the left"? Surely you're joking? These two are conservatives, in another
timeline they'd be Republicans. What they have going for them is they, like many Americans,
believe in the Constitution of the United States, about what the country is and what its
trying to acheve. It strives to build "a more perfect union".
This the fundamenal error many people made about the Deep State. I've no doubt that
there's a fom of Deep State out there, an ingrained conservative streak in the bureaucracy,
because there is in all bureaucracies. But the real Deep State is all of us, its every last
person who believes in the system, in the American form of democracy and the principles upon
which the nation was founded. There are innumerable personal interpretations of exactly what
this means but the sum total is the United States.
Trump, MAGA and the modern GoP represent 'capture', the idea that the capture of the state
can be turned to personal profit. In doing so Trump and his enablers degraded the notion of
what the US is and why it exists. This is what's caused the backlash, its not 'the left' or
'socialism'.
Sgt Oddball , Jan 10, 2021 10:54 PM Reply to
Martin Usher
"Biden/Harris "the left"? Surely you're joking?"
- The proverbial 'Overton Window' has, at this point, collapsed to a quantum singularity,
about a nothingth of a planck length wide
- Prepare for *Teh Great Suck*!
Peanut butter wolf , Jan 10, 2021 8:11 PM
You seriously think Trump was genuinly elected? All the points you make show obviously he
was a puppet and psy-op of the deepstate from the very beginning.
The deepstate won because they never had an enemy, they created him from the start, with or
without him knowing we dont know, but anyone on that level is on a need to know basis anyway.
It's clear that his every move is steered with the goal to bring down rogue antiestablishment
sentiments.
And it worked very well. Radical left antiestablishment is suddenly prodemocrats and
radical right antiestablishment is totally disillusioned and just became domestic
terrorists.
Trump wasn't supposed to win in 2016. The deep state probably wanted liberal Jeb Bush or
Rubio or Cruz in there. Trump destroyed all the competition in the GOP primaries. Remember,
Trump wasn't picked by the deep state to be their guy. He financed his own campaign. He was a
major burr in their saddle. The Trump phenomenon is real and he proved it with a landslide
victory that was stolen.
Martin Usher , Jan 12, 2021 6:16 PM Reply to
Thom1111
What 'landslide'? The numbers tell a very different story. Trump should have won a second
term but he didn't because of two things, one being the grass roots efforts of Democrats to
motivate voter groups despite systematic road blocks being placed in those groups' path and
the other -- a important one -- being that there's quite a lot of life long Republicans out
there that cannot stand Trump.
Trumpism is like a cult in many ways. One feature is that those who 'believe' find it
difficult to come to grips with the fact that they might hold a minority view. They're used
to being embattled, that's a signature feature of such groups (they're always fighting for
something against an implacable enemy, preferably an unseen one) but its just inconceivable
that they're really a fringe group. The events of last Wednesday have probably done more to
promote Democrat candidates than anything else this cycle; fortunately for the most part the
election was over so all they lost were the two Senate seats.
PS -- May I draw your attention to an old Beatles song -- "Revolution"? (I'd also suggest
an even old song "Trouble Coming" from the Mothers of Invention.)
Voz 0db , Jan 10, 2021 7:58 PM
Under the CURRENT MAIN SYSTEM – The Monetary System – there is no "drain the
swamp"!
James Meeks , Jan 10, 2021 10:29 PM Reply to
Voz 0db
Then you're going to love the technocrats "social credits" scheme such as China currently
imposes on it's population.
Voz 0db , Jan 11, 2021 10:43 AM Reply to
James Meeks
China developed that system with the HELP of the Western Corporations, so that in a near
future the tech will be deployed in the western Plantations. OPERATION COVIDIUS is just the
1st of many operations that will create the FEAR & PANIC conditions among the herds of
modern western moron slaves, that will make it really easy for THEM to deploy that tech.
Why do you think China was the chosen one to practice a "city lockdown" during EVENT 201
planning?
Why do you think China was on the news of western countries while they were executing the
lockdown and then no more China news?
China is also under the Shadow of the SRF & Billionaires at least for now. The only
thing China is trying to achieve is to shift the POWER of the SRF into Chinese Families,
nothing more.
maxine , Jan 10, 2021 7:48 PM
What has Off-G come to? .One must be truly mad to imagine that D. tHRUMP
"SINCERELY" thought ANYTHING EVER, let alone "changing the way America is run" .He's
incapable of comprehending what the word "SINCERITY" means .Sorry the author has lost his
hero.
OffG publishes articles and anybody who wants to can comment on them.
It does not push, or imagine, any group philosophy other than to support us all in a deep
distrust of what the mainstream media ram down our throats every day, and to give us space to
express our personal disgust in our own way.
We are not going to imagine what you would like us to imagine merely on your say-so
either, although you are quite free to tell us what your personal recommendations are.
OffG has never been pro-Trump, and we are all aware that the alternative is far from being
any better.
Perhaps you would like to tell us what is really bugging you, given that you have
never been under any pressure even to show up here At the very least, you could stay on
topic:
So, what about the swamp, and who you think is most likely to succeed in draining it ?
Carol Jones , Jan 10, 2021 8:53 PM Reply to
wardropper
Hear Hear!
Gezzah Potts , Jan 10, 2021 10:26 PM Reply to
wardropper
Spot on W👍
YouTube_censors_unfortuna , Jan 10, 2021 7:40 PM
Trump's racist fan base supported America's bogus War of Terrorism against blameless
Muslim countries, did they not? What goes around, comes around.
I think you are getting fan bases mixed up. Trump inherited these conflicts from Bush,
Iraq 2002 invasion & Obama's 2015 invasion of Syria and it was Trump that threatened to
end the propping up of the endless war industry. In fact that played the major role in why
Trump had to be removed at all costs including selling treason and vote rigging as Democracy
to be defended against "domestic terrorists".
YouTube_censors_unfortuna , Jan 11, 2021 9:45 AM Reply to
James Meeks
Did America's white patriots oppose the demonisation of Muslims as being terrorists who
did 9/11 or did they participate in this US government fiction?
No, at least half of the patriots are and were aware that 9/11 was an inside job.
Geoffrey Skoll , Jan 10, 2021 7:25 PM
Right! The Donald was too weak and too stupid. A smarter president got shot for his
troubles, but the rulers knew they didn't have to resort to that against the Donald. He was
obsessed with his mirror. All those meeting between Ike and JFK, what do you think they were
talking about?
Sounds like you came to Off Guardian thinking it was the Guardian and expected to find a
group of like minded consumers of security state propaganda in a Trump bashing fest.
Do u relly guys think Trump was a hope for all pf us? I am still amazed that
people(including off-guard) still thinks in terms of left vs right, good vs bad, and all that
narrative. I am afraid that nnarrativ has never been true. It is part of the game of "the
matrix" to keep us entertained in shows programmed for tth masses, division, polarizaiomn,
saviours and "heros". In my opinion it is time for a deep shift. Continuing to hope that some
guy will save us all, it is just seeing a tree but not being able to see the woods. While
some keep waiting for somebody to save us, they are moving forward with their plans really
fast. But no problem guys. Sooner or later the rrality will knock on you door, and you will
have to decide if you are going to be a slave or a free human. And it will be all about what
you decide. No american hero or any messiah will do it for you.
Sophie - Admin1 , Jan 10, 2021 9:50 PM Reply to
MANUEL
We have warned against accepting the Left/Right paradigm many times. This is NOT an
editorial and therefore is not 'the voice of OffG'.
Some visitors here need to up their sophistication level to the point they understand we
publish a SPECTRUM of dissident opinion that we consider merits discussion or a wider
audience, without necessarily agreeing with all of it.
"Some visitors here need to up their sophistication level to the point they understand
we publish a SPECTRUM of dissident opinion "
- Yep, well that's as may be, but Andrew Korybko's position is *Lame As All Hell* –
Every establishment talking point *Covered* – just from the 'Contrarian' side
- Trump was an 'Outsider' who 'Became' an 'Insider'?! – Aww Puh-lease! – He
was a *Stalking Horse
- "He didn't have the *'Strength'* to 'Drain The Swamp'(tm)"??!?! – *No-One*
*Indivudal* in all Creation could've
- Do you think we're *Children*?!
Asylum , Jan 11, 2021 3:26 PM Reply to
Sgt Oddball
been on this site a whole while now not seen any articles discussing trump failures
James Meeks , Jan 10, 2021 11:06 PM Reply to
MANUEL
We are all aware that we are the playthings of the rich and powerful but all you're doing
is stating what most of us already know. What is your solution? So tell us please what you
are doing to that makes you feel free and not a slave? Are you living off the grid? Not using
currency? What is it you're doing that makes you different from those of us you claim are not
facing reality? I think many people, myself included, who have no love for Trump see that he
is being denounced by every billionaire member of the Davos gang of criminals as a threat to
world order and the economy while they shut down the planet with medical martial law and
create an authoritarian Globalist Technocratic dictatorship ending Democracies worldwide and
targeting "domestic terrorists" who oppose them.
George Mc , Jan 10, 2021 6:35 PM
The steps on how to destroy all of the services, public and private though
focussing on the NHS:
Seize on a moderate flu variant. Build it up to be the blackest
death since the black death. Seize on all the old people who die anyway and claim their
numbers as an indication of the carnage. For anyone still hesitant, introduce hypocritical
emotional blackmail about "the most vulnerable" in our society to shame everyone into the
game On the basis of those appropriated death figures, endlessly circulate fear porn –
enhanced by the fact that the symptoms of this apocalyptic virus are indistinguishable from
the regular flu or even the common cold. Get everyone to steer clear of everyone else. Close
down all "inessential" work plus communal gathering places to ensure everyone is isolated
before the droning monolithic message you are pumping out. Introduce even more draconian
measures for anyone who "has" the bug – effectively barring them even (especially) from
care work. Prioritise the new bug cases so that they have access to hospital facilities
– while anyone with other (real) illnesses are barred to "protect" them! This fills up
the hospitals with hypochondriacs with the common cold. Introduce the notion that some may
carry the bug without symptoms. Introduce a new test which can determine who has the
symptomless bug. On the basis of those magical symptomless bug test kits, bar the
essential workers from supporting the vulnerable – in order to "protect the
vulnerable"! Constantly report on how the NHS is collapsing – which it is, being filled
up with folks with the cold and turning everyone else away, and also being deprived of
essential workers who tested positive for the symptomless bug. Just stand back and watch it
all collapse whilst continuing to report on it with increasing horror!
George Mc , Jan 10, 2021 6:41 PM Reply to
George Mc
PS the list is not exhaustive. I didn't even touch on the phony Left/Right divide.
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL , Jan 10, 2021 7:18 PM Reply to
George Mc
EXCERPTS FROM THE AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS INTO COVID-19 AND CARE HOMES.
A must read.
The Department of Health and Social Care . adopted a policy, that led to 25,000 patients,
including those (known to be) infected (with Covid-19, and also those who were) possibly
infected with Covid-19 (but) had not been tested, being discharged from hospital into care
homes between 17 March and 15 April -- exponentially increasing the risk of transmission to
the very population most at risk of severe illness and death from the disease. (This, while
being denied) access to testing, (being denied) personal protective equipment, (while having)
insufficient staff, and limited (and confusing) guidance.
Most certainly not the abstract concept of "law and order". For one thing, it is now
abundantly clear that some cops deliberately let a (rather small) subset of protestors not only
across police lines but even inside the Capitol Building itself. That is not exactly law and
order, now is it? Furthermore, it is now also clear that Ashli Babbitt was very deliberately
shot by an (apparently black) cop who was then quickly hidden away from sight by the
authorities. Not exactly law and order either.
Neither did the abstract concept of "democracy" win anything that day. Many protesters were
recorded saying that the Capitol building belonged to the people, not to the people working in
it on behalf of the people. They are right. But even if we accept the notion that those who
entered the building were trespassing, the massive crackdown on free speech which immediately
followed the events at the Capitol is a clear sign that "democracy" did not win that day. More
about that later.
So who won?
Well, look who is celebrating and who is now demanding that punitive and even repressive
measures be taken against Trump supporters:
The Democrats The united legacy corporate
ziomedia The letter soup agencies and their top officials Most of the GOP leaders The War Lobby
(including lots of ex Cold Warriors) Big Money (MIC, Oil, Pharma, Jails and Prisons, etc.) The
Israel Lobby (especially the ADL -- see here
and
here ) The Russia-hating Lobby Antifa/BLM/etc The many freaks of nature leading various
"minorities" Big Tech megacorporations a la Google and Amazon
The list is longer, of course, and it includes pretty much all the folks afflicted with the
now famous Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS).
Our list looks like a cocktail of very different actors, but is that really the case?
I submit that if we look closely at this list of possible "winners" we can quickly see that
we are dealing with a single social category /group whose "diversity" is only apparent.
Here is what all these groups have in common:
They are numerically small, definitely a
minority They are very wealthy They are very close to the real centers of power They share the
same narcissistic (Neocon) ideology of self-worship They are driven by the same hate-based
ideology of revenge They don't care about the people of the USA They want to dismantle the US
Constitutional order
On the basis of these common characteristics, I believe that we can speak about a social
class united by a common ideology .
Now, of course, in the plutocratic oligarchy (which the United States in reality is), the
notion of "class" has been declared heretical and it has been replaced by identity politics --
the best way for a ruling class to (a) hide behind a fake illusion of pluralism and (b) to
divide the people and rule over them.
I have already written about what I consider to be a US version of the Soviet Nomenklatura , a
special ruling class which was official in the (comparatively much more honest) Soviet system
but which is always hidden from sight by the rulers of the United States.
The actual word we use are not that important: Nomenklatura , class, caste,
establishment, powers that be, deep state, etc. -- they all approximate the reality of a small
gang of self-declared "elites" (as opposed to the "deplorables") ruling with total impunity and
no checks and balances mitigating their de facto dictatorship. Some well-intentioned people
began speaking about the "1%" -- which is not bad, even if the actual figure is even smaller
than just one percent. Others used "Wall Street" (as in the "occupy WS" movement), again -- not
a bad attempt to describe the problem. Whatever the terms you chose, what is certain is that
this entity has what Marx would call a " class consciousness " which produces a single "
class ideology " characterized by an extremely strong sense of "us versus them"
.
By the way, while I disagree with any notion that the US Nomenklatura is Marxist or
Socialist in any way, I very much agree that these "elites" are displaying an ideological
zeal very similar to what Trotskysts or Nazis typically exhibit, especially when confronted
with the "deplorables" or, like FoxNews says, the "mob" (the Polish word " bydło " -- cattle -- very
accurately renders this contempt for the masses).
In fact, they see us all as their "class enemy" . And they are quite correct, by the
way.
Their ideology is messianic, racist, violent and hate filled while the members of this US
Nomenklatura see themselves as the cream of the crop, the "chosen people", whose
"destiny" is to rule over the "dark and primitive" "mob".
This contempt for the "mob" is something which self-described "liberals" always try to
conceal, but which always comes out, be it in 1917 Russia or in 2021 USA. There is a weird
logic to this, by the way. It goes something like this: " we are clearly superior to the
plebes, yet these plebes seem to reject that notion, these plebes are therefore a "dark mob"
which absolutely needs to be strictly ruled by us ". The underlying assumption is that
plebes are dangerous, they can always riot and threaten "us". Hence the need for a police
state. QED.
"... Oh, yes, you really did it this time! You stormed the goddamned US Capitol. You and your racist, Russia-backed army of bison-hat wearing half-naked actors have meddled with the primal forces of GloboCap, and now, by God, you will atone! ..."
"... No, do not try to minimize your crimes. You entered a building without permission! The building where America simulates democracy! You walked around in there waving silly flags! You went into the Chamber, into people's offices! One of you actually put his filthy populist feet up on Pelosi's desk ON HER DESK! This aggression will not stand! ..."
So, welcome to 2021! If last week was any indication, it is going to be quite an exciting year. It is going to be the year in
which GloboCap reminds everyone who is actually in charge and restores "normality" throughout the world.
or at least attempts to restore "normality," or the "New Normality," or the "Great Normal Reset," or "The New Normal War on Domestic
Terror" or whatever they eventually decide to call it.
In any event, whatever they call it, GloboCap is done playing grab-ass. They have had it with all this "populism" malarkey that
has been going on for the last four years.
Yes, that's right, the party is over, you Russian-backed white supremacist terrorists! You Trump-loving, anti-mask grandmother
killers! You anti-vax, election-fraud-conspiracy theorists! You deviants who refuse to follow orders, wear your damn masks, vote
for who they tell you, and believe whatever completely nonsensical official propaganda they pour into your heads!
Oh, yes, you really did it this time! You stormed the goddamned US Capitol. You and your racist, Russia-backed army of
bison-hat wearing half-naked actors have meddled with the primal forces of GloboCap, and now, by God, you will atone!
No, do not try to minimize your crimes. You entered a building without permission! The building where America simulates democracy!
You walked around in there waving silly flags! You went into the Chamber, into people's offices! One of you actually
put his filthy populist feet up on Pelosi's desk ON HER DESK! This aggression will not stand!
OK, before I go any further with this essay, I need to explain to my regular readers (in case it wasn't already clear) that I've
decided to forswear every word I've ever written, and all my principles, and my common sense, and join the remainder of my old leftist
and liberal friends in the orgy of online hate and outrage they are currently mindlessly indulging in.
I'm already in enough trouble as it is for not playing ball with their "
apocalyptic plague ," and whatever else I
am, I am certainly no martyr, and I have a career in the arts to consider, so I have decided to listen to my inner coward and join
the goose-stepping global-capitalist mob, which is why this column sounds slightly out of character.
See, back in the old days, before my conversion, I would have made fun of my liberal friends for calling this "storming" of the
Capitol a "coup," or an "insurrection," and for demanding that the protesters be prosecuted as "domestic terrorists."
I probably would have scolded them a bit for taking to the Internet and spewing their hatred at
the unarmed woman
shot dead by the police like a pack of soulless, totalitarian jackals.
I might have even made a reference to that infamous scene in Schindler's List where the crowd of "normal" German citizens
all laugh and jeer as the Jews are marched away to the ghetto by the Nazi goons.
But, now that I have seen the light, I see how bad and wrong that would have been. Clearly, trespassing in the US Capitol is a
crime that should be punishable by death. And comparing contemporary American liberals to the "good Germans" during the Nazi era
is so outrageous that well, it should probably be censored.
In fact (and I hope my liberal friends are still reading this), the police should have shot the entire lot of them! All these
Russian-backed Nazi insurrectionists should have been gunned down right there on the spot, preferably by muscle-bound corporate mercenaries
and CIA snipers in Black Hawk helicopters with big Facebook and Twitter logos on them!
Actually, anyone who trespassed in the Capitol Building (which is like a cathedral), or just came to the protest wearing a MAGA
hat, should be hunted down by federal authorities, charged as a "domestic white-supremacist terrorist," frog-marched out onto Black
Lives Matter Plaza, and shot, in the face, live, on TV, so that everyone can watch and howl at their screens like the
Two Minutes
Hate in 1984 . That would teach these "insurrectionists" a lesson!
Or they could shoot them in one of those corporate-branded stadiums! We could make it a weekly televised event. It's not like
there is any shortage of Trump-supporting "domestic terrorists." They could use a different stadium every week, deck the place out
with big "New Normal" banners, play music, make speeches, the whole nine yards. Everyone would have to wear masks, of course, and
strictly adhere to social distancing. Folks could bring the kids, make a day of it.
How am I doing so far, leftist and liberal friends? No? Not fanatical and hateful enough?
OK, so what is it going to take to convince you that I have changed my tune, got my mind right, and am totally on board with the
New Normal totalitarianism? Trump? Sure, I can do Trump. I hate him! He's Hitler! He's Russian Hitler! He's Russian White Supremacist
Hitler!
Yes, I know I've spent the last four years pointing out that he isn't actually Hitler, or a Russian agent, and that he's really
just the same ridiculous, narcissistic ass clown that he has always been, but I was wrong. He's definitely Hitler, and a Russian
agent! He is certainly not just a pathetic old huckster without a single powerful ally in Washington who could not stage an actual
coup if Putin nuked every blue state on the map.
No, I soil myself in fear before his awesome power. Never mind that he's just been banned by
Facebook ,
Twitter , and
numerous other corporate platforms , and made a fool of by the corporate media, the international political establishment, the
Intelligence agencies, and the rest of GloboCap since the day he took the oath of office.
Forget the fact that, although he holds the nuclear launch codes in his tiny little hands and is Commander in Chief of the US
military, the most he could do to challenge his removal was file a buttload of hopeless lawsuits and sit around in the Oval Office
eating cheeseburgers and tweeting into the night.
No, none of that means a thing, not when he still has the power to "embolden" a few dozen pissed-off Americans to storm (
or calmly walk ) into the Capitol and
take selfies sitting in the Vice President's Chair!
Look, the point is, I hate him. And I hate his supporters. I hate everyone who doesn't hate him and his supporters. I hate everyone
who won't wear a mask. I hate the Republicans. I hate the Russians. I hate everyone who won't get the vaccine. My God do I hate them!
I am so full of hatred and mindless rage that it is making me crazy. I am so consumed with self-righteous hatred, propaganda, and
manufactured hysteria that, if Rachel Maddow, or Chris Hayes, or whoever, told me that it was time to round them all up, these "domestic
terrorists," these "insurrectionists," these "conspiracy theorists," these "anti-mask extremists" (and anyone else who won't obey
us), and put them on trains and send them to camps, I'd probably be OK with that.
How am I doing, liberals? Am I back in the club? Because, I get it. I swear! I'm cured! Praise God! I'm ready to pitch in and
do my part. I believe in GloboCap's final victory! I'm willing to work, if our leaders order me, ten, twelve, or fourteen hours a
day, and give all I have for GloboCap victory! I am ready for total ideological war an ideological war more total and radical than
anything I can even imagine!
Sure, our imaginary enemies are formidable (and this war will probably last forever or at least until the end of global capitalism),
but, in the words of one our greatest liberal heroes, George W. Bush, "bring it on!"
*
CJ Hopkins is an award-winning American playwright, novelist and political satirist based in Berlin. His plays are published
by Bloomsbury Publishing and Broadway Play Publishing, Inc. His dystopian novel,
Zone 23 , is published by Snoggsworthy,
Swaine & Cormorant. Volume I of his
Consent Factory Essays
is published by Consent Factory Publishing, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amalgamated Content, Inc. He can be reached at
cjhopkins.com or consentfactory.org
.
Too many people letting their wishful thinking override their wisdom, just like when Obama
was enthroned. I will admit that I was fooled back in 2008 as well, thinking "This time
things are finally different!" , though in my defense I will say that the "Reality
Distortion Field" built around BHO by the mass media was far more believable than the one
they have scraped together for Biden.
Biden being installed will thus buy the empire a "grace period" in which other
countries (EU mostly) will happily buy into America's next war effort. As with the
post-Bushlette era decorated with the Obama figurehead, the empire will take advantage of
this "grace period" to escalate its violence.
After all, that is why they want someone like Biden in the White House in the first place.
If the imperial establishment were at all interested in global de-escalation then they would
have gone forward with it when Trump demanded troops out instead of playing shell games to
keep the empire's wars on a low boil. Trump's belligerent noise-making made it impossible
for the empire to escalate its wars. The empire needs someone who is willing to put a nice
"progressive" spin on mass murder in order to get buy-in for a renewed round of
slaughter.
The empire will not waste this opportunity. They have been waiting four years for it.
There will be more war.
Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 20 2021 21:14 utc | 77
Agree with most of this as well as your other post earlier in the thread.
Biden is an attempt to put the mask back on the monster so that the woke, "resistance"
crowd will continue to not care about the unabated slaughter abroad. I mean, when you really
look at it, they (and the corporate mainstream "liberal" media) rarely criticized Trump's
foreign policy and often cheered it, albeit without ever openly praising him, per se. We saw
the occasional article about the ethnic cleansing in Yemen that Trump greatly aided and
abetted, but everyone including the NYT was completely behind his war on Venezuela and
attempt to create war with Iran. The media got a bit up in arms when Kashoggi was murdered -
because of course he was then a journalist - but even that died down quite quickly while
Trump continued feting the Israelis and Saudis.
The coming hot wars will be fought with all of the record breaking arms that Trump sold in
the Middle East and Southeast Asia.
All of that having been said, I'll repeat a point I've made since we started talking about
the election: Trump didn't "start any new wars" because there wasn't much left to do after
Obama and Bush set the world on fire and the Iranians (and Venezuelans) showed restraint when
attacked - both physically and economically. Trump and his Zionist handlers would have loved
it if the USA had ended up in a war with either of those countries and I have no doubt that
if he was elected to a 2nd term, we'd have seen one or both transpire. With Biden, same thing
as the first thing about Trump - There isn't much left to destroy that the USA could actually
get away with and I suspect he will continue the existing wars for however long he (or
Kopmala) is in office.
It's an Empire with a revolving-door Emperor called a President or Prime Minister. The
facts are fixed around the policy. We're obviously headed back toward a more 'can't we all
get along' empire, after four years of a guy who thought he was an actual emperor, instead of
a bobble-head. The differences between the two monopoly parties in the USA are entirely
domestic and are nothing but the size of the crumbs given to the people who think they are
free.
bottom line kadath.. the usa will be an ongoing slavish servant to israel.. that much is
clear as day... which way it goes - syria or iran - none of the saber rattling will stop..
israel doesn't want it to stop! neither does the american duopoly! the people might, but
they don't get a say and generally are not interested in foreign policy..
IMO Biden will do as he is told. His white house chief of staff is a powerful and
skilled player and is quite experienced in working with Biden. Joe could well be diverted to
give solid focus on the home front while the rats he has appointed continue their global
piracy and belligerence. I figure that is why they ran the old fool.
On January 21, the president-elect will sign a number of executive actions to move
aggressively to change the course of the COVID-19 crisis and safely re-open schools and
businesses, including by taking action to mitigate spread through expanding testing,
protecting workers, and establishing clear public health standards.
On January 22, the president-elect will direct his Cabinet agencies to take immediate
action to deliver economic relief to working families bearing the brunt of this crisis.
Between January 25 and February 1, the president-elect will sign additional executive
actions, memoranda and Cabinet directives. The president-elect will fulfill his promises to
strengthen Buy American provisions so the future of America is made in America. He will
take significant early actions to advance equity and support communities of color and other
underserved communities. He will take action to begin fulfilling campaign promises related
to reforming our criminal justice system. The president-elect will sign additional
executive actions to address the climate crisis with the urgency the science demands and
ensure that science guides the administration's decision making. President-elect Biden will
take first steps to expand access to health care – including for low-income women and
women of color. He will fulfill his promises to restore dignity to our immigration system
and our border policies, and start the difficult but critical work of reuniting families
separated at the border. And, President-elect Biden will demonstrate that America is back
and take action to restore America's place in the world.
As noted above, this list is not comprehensive. More items and more details will be
forthcoming in the days ahead.
Time will tell how the other appointees in the administration align with Klain and the
extent of the savage power struggle that is soon to manifest.
The USA is now the proverbial Whale in a Swimming Pool: it is big, powerful and impressive
- but can't hide its moves anymore and has little to none margin for any maneuver.
The American Center-wing is ossifying, or, in Cold Warrior terminology (Arthur
Schlesinger Jr.), is losing its "vitality". It is entering a stage where it must "burn the
village in order to save it".
... it seems the answer is that Germany plays the role in Europe that the US plays in the
world and both are satisfied with that role even though neo-liberalism, austerity and
war-mongering are leading us to inhumanity and disaster.
Like i said before elsewhere Biden would capitalize on what Trump has put forth and take
the infamy and blame for instead of moving in the opposite directions of whatever Trump
criticized for in foreign policy. That means be it trade war with China, renege on climate
deals, strong arming NATO and EU countries, or giving everything Israel wants nothing stop
Biden from maintaining what has been put in place.
At most they'll just make excuse on why they had to maintain the policies they themselves
criticized Trump for without changing direction.
He said Joe Biden's strong conviction was that the Nord Stream 2 pipeline is a "bad idea"
and that the administration would use "every persuasive tool" to convince partners,
including Germany, to discard the project.
That is pretty much a declaration of war against countries in Europe. Stay
away,
America's
disarray is its own woes, not other countries' opportunity The Financial Times lives in
a world where the USA doesn't have more than 2,000 operational nukes, doesn't control the
financial system (SWIFT), doesn't issue the universal fiat currency (Dollar Standard),
doesn't have a big fucking navy, doesn't enjoy absolute ideological hegemony etc. etc.
...Tronald's foreign policy has been a disaster, even if he has supposedly not sparked a
new war. Let's not talk about all the secret operations, multiplied drone attacks, state
terrorist assassinations, etc. And the new administration is now continuing this...
They've stopped thinking, become utterly predictable.
They just go through the motions. They know that they can't win-achieve their long held
objectives-but they can't stop repeating themselves, including their past errors. They are
not allowed to. The US ruling caste-servants of the ruling class- are only allowed to
operate within very narrow boundaries. They aren't allowed to take radical measures when
faced with new crises- they are confined within ever diminishing political circles. The
duopoly has become an obvious One Party system. And its politics are those of the Gilded
Age-150 years old and still going strong.
The only solution to America's problems is defeat so complete that it cannot be denied
even by the least perceptive. Anyone with money to spare should be buying popcorn
futures.
...Biden is an elderly figurehead. Trump's mistake was being openly bullying and vulgar
instead of underhanded. Already, the EU ( as cowardly vassals ) are falling into line on
Iran and Russia.
...Paul Craig Roberts is correct. There has not been a regime change, there has been a
revolution and treating policies of this "president" as if he is more than a figurehead
being run by oligarchs is foolish in the extreme.
They've stopped thinking, become utterly predictable.
One could say this about the American people who have been herded into two camps so that
the Center can rule. Here's an example: One of Biden's first executive actions is to
include undocumented residents in the Census. This will please the Left immensely and
outrage the Right. But the Census is conducted every 10 years and it was completed in 2020.
So Biden's action is actually meaningless. How many people will actual notice this? Very
few.
It is funny/sad to see the Post Trump Stress Disorder victims are already rationalizing
and making excuses for the war that the establishment drones they voted for will be
starting, and those drones are not even sworn in to office yet. They know that they voted
for war yet their plastic, Hollywood "identities" are so intertwined with their assumed
self-evident moral superiority that they are compelled to defend the evil they are
responsible for even before it is committed. For them, doing nothing crudely is far worse
than murdering millions accompanied by lofty and emotive platitudes.
Meet the Filthy Rich War Hawks That Make up Biden's New Foreign Policy Team
"I expect the prevailing direction of U.S. foreign policy over these last decades to
continue: more lawless bombing and killing multiple countries under the cover of "limited
engagement," – Biden Biographer Branko Marcetic
by Alan Macleod November 13th, 2020
https://www.mintpressnews.com/filthy-rich-war-hawks-make-joe-biden-foreign-policy-team/273039/
Neera Tanden – Reduce US Deficits by Raiding the Economies of Countries We Have
Destroyed:
Neera Tanden, Biden's Pick for Budget Office: Now Is Not the Time To 'Worry About Raising
Deficits and Debt'
by Robby Soave https://reason.com/2020/11/30/neera-tanden-biden-omb-debt-deficit/
She once suggested that if Americans care about the deficit so much, maybe we should make
Libya pay for it.
| 11/30/2020
( Ariana Ruiz/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom )
Trump ripped the mask off US foreign policy and exposed it for what it is - ugly Zionism
and outrageous Jewish supremacy. Trump did many foreign policy changes previous incumbents
and their handlers wanted to do but were constrained by the optics and international
opinion.
I agree the Biden administration will continue the same tired old foreign policy, only
with the mask back on. Of course the media won't notice the similarities, but the public
will. No matter how fervently the managers tinker with the edges it is events that drive
changes and change people.
I just listened to President Biden's speech. It was a good one, even a great one. Thinking
about what Plato means by the 'noble lie' it was a noble speech, and there wasn't much of a
lie about it.
b finished the posting with
"
While Trump had continued the wars the U.S. waged when he came into office he did not start
any new ones. Since Joe Biden first entered the Senate 47 years ago he has cheered on every
war the U.S. has since waged. It would be astonishing to find four years from now that he
did not start any new ones.
"
Prepare to be astonished. Biden isn't going to start any new wars for the same reason
that Trump didn't......MAD
Humanity has been in the MAD phase of the civilization war we are in since the Obama era
push back in Syria.
Biden's chest beating will not be as "impressive" as Trump's but the trajectory is the
same.
The new chief says to tighten the circle of wagons, but those accused of besieging the
Outlaw US Empire's wagon train stopped attacking and moved on long ago. Meanwhile,
supplying the wagon train continues to take resources away from dealing with very real
domestic problems. The upshot is China will continue to pull away and increase its lead
geoeconomically, and together with Russia will continue to solidify and strengthen the
Eurasian Bloc. Very soon, the EU is going to be faced with a very stark choice--to join the
Eurasian Bloc and thus stave-off economic atrophy or continue to allow its brand of
Neoliberal Parasites to eat and risk rupture, perhaps not in 2021 but before 2030.
The key is that the false narrative that was initiated in 1945 and bolstered in 1979
continues to be treated as gospel despite its path to certain ruin. I noted there were no
questions asked about the international call for a Bretton Woods 2.0 that would end dollar
hegemony and Petrodollar recycling, while removing the one source of coercion behind its
illegal sanctions.
The only possible target of opportunity I see is Venezuela as the frack-patch is about
to fold-up shop and fuel prices cause domestic inflation to soar -- Here in Oregon, gas
prices have gone up 50cents/gal since the first of the year--25%. The oil being the obvious
target now the the lower-48 has definitely peaked.
@ 32 juliania... you are the eternal optimist! there is something admirable about that!..
however you have to contend with a lot of cynical people who think like it's business as
well, as b's post notes..... you might not like to hear this, but nothing is going to
change under biden... big wheels set in motion and biden is not interested in the least in
changing any of it... neither was trump as some of his fanbots are coming to see too...
political speeches are just so much b.s... juliania - as the saying goes, talk is cheap, it
is actions that count.... watch peoples actions, not their talk... biden can talk a good
line, but that has nothing to do with his actions... top of the day to you!
@34 Invading Venezuela and 'taking the oil' won't be easy though there is a possibility
Colombia will help out. Which means the total disruption of South America. More economical
to just buy the stuff.
"It is funny/sad to see the Post Trump Stress Disorder victims are already rationalizing
and making excuses for the war that the establishment drones they voted for will be
starting, and those drones are not even sworn in to office yet. They know that they voted
for war yet their plastic, Hollywood "identities" are so intertwined with their assumed
self-evident moral superiority that they are compelled to defend the evil they are
responsible for even before it is committed. For them, doing nothing crudely is far worse
than murdering millions accompanied by lofty and emotive platitudes."
Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 20 2021 16:16 utc | 26
Tnx for expressing this in a much nicer and polite way then i would have written. And
yes, yes it is sad/amusing to watch NPC`s turn into pretzels to explain away their
cognitive dissonans ,utter foolishness and stupidity.
The Saker has posted an article "What Is To Be Done?" which shows what is
apparently the only image of the size of the crowd that attended the Save America rally at
President's Park in Washington DC, in support of outgoing President Donald Trump, on 6
January 2021. The image was taken by a journalist affiliated with an Asian media
publication.
The article estimates that the numbers who attended the rally were in the range of 150,000
to 300,000.
These articles (see here and
here ) state that "thousands" attended the rally on 7 January 2021.
If what The Saker and the other sources whose articles I linked to are correct, then we do
not need to wonder why 26,000 National Guard members were needed to safeguard Joe Biden's
inauguration.
The USA is facing an existential crisis. This month is the thirtieth anniversary of Desert
Storm's first invasion of Iraq. Eight tours overseas and two in combat zones in the Air Force
can't help but mess with one's head.
The closure of DC and 25,000 National Guard soldiers but no regular army troops guarding
the inaugural is weird. No one is doing threat analysis. National Guard units are deployed
overseas too. This appears to be to tamp down dissent but keep the Pentagon's hands
clean.
Forever Wars, Identity Politics and the Wuhan Coronavirus have brought things to a head.
The only way to fight the war against the virus, end the economic depression, short-circuit
unrest, and live in a multi-polar world as a 50-state nation is to restore the Constitution
and government by and for the people.
The nation's military has a history of downplaying white nationalism and right-wing
activism, but the siege of the Capitol has created a new urgency for dealing with them.
I mean they will try.
But, ultimately, they won't succeed. The Pentagon simply wouldn't have enough recruits if
they did go all in with this purge.
I still stick with my prediction: the USA will enter a "Byzantine Era", marked by
economic, geopolitical decline (more Pacific/West Coast oriented), and by a cultural shift to
religious fundamentalism at least in its armed forces.
No doubt about it: the coup d'etat was successful. That January 6
attempt by so-called insurrectionists to overturn the election results was not the real
coup, however. Those who answered
President Trump's call to march on the Capitol were merely the fall guys, manipulated into
creating the perfect crisis for the Deep State -- a.k.a. the Police State a.k.a. the Military
Industrial Complex a.k.a. the Techno-Corporate State a.k.a. the Surveillance State -- to swoop
in and take control.
It took no time at all for the switch to be thrown and the nation's capital to be placed
under a military lockdown, online speech forums restricted, and individuals with subversive or
controversial viewpoints
ferreted out, investigated, shamed and/or shunned .
This new order didn't emerge into being this week, or this month, or even this year,
however.
Indeed, the real coup happened when our government "of the people, by the people, for the
people" was overthrown by a profit-driven, militaristic, techno-corporate state that is in
cahoots with a government "of the rich, by the elite, for the corporations."
Writing in 1980, Gross predicted a future in which he saw:
a new despotism creeping slowly across America. Faceless oligarchs sit at command posts of
a corporate-government complex that has been slowly evolving over many decades. In efforts to
enlarge their own powers and privileges, they are willing to have others suffer the intended
or unintended consequences of their institutional or personal greed. For Americans, these
consequences include chronic inflation, recurring recession, open and hidden unemployment,
the poisoning of air, water, soil and bodies, and, more important, the subversion of our
constitution. More broadly, consequences include widespread
intervention in international politics through economic manipulation, covert action, or
military invasion "
This stealthy, creeping, silent coup that Gross prophesied is the same danger that writer
Rod Serling envisioned in the 1964 political thriller Seven Days in May , a
clear warning to beware of martial law packaged as a well-meaning and overriding concern for
the nation's security.
Incredibly enough, almost 60 years later, we find ourselves hostages to a government run
more by military doctrine and corporate greed than by the rule of law established in the
Constitution. Indeed, proving once again that fact and fiction are not dissimilar, today's
current events could well have been lifted straight out of Seven Days in May , which
takes viewers into eerily familiar terrain.
The premise is straightforward.
With the Cold War at its height, an unpopular U.S. President signs a momentous nuclear
disarmament treaty with the Soviet Union. Believing that the treaty constitutes an unacceptable
threat to the security of the United States and certain that he knows what is best for the
nation, General James Mattoon Scott (played by Burt Lancaster), the head of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and presidential hopeful, plans a military takeover of the national government. When Gen.
Scott's aide, Col. Casey (Kirk Douglas), discovers the planned military coup, he goes to the
President with the information. The race for command of the U.S. government begins, with the
clock ticking off the hours until the military plotters plan to overthrow the President.
Needless to say, while on the big screen, the military coup is foiled and the republic is
saved in a matter of hours, in the real world, the plot thickens and spreads out over the past
half century.
We've been losing our freedoms so incrementally for so long -- sold to us in the name of
national security and global peace, maintained by way of martial law disguised as law and
order, and enforced by a standing army of militarized police and a political elite determined
to maintain their powers at all costs -- that it's hard to pinpoint exactly when it all started
going downhill, but we've been on that fast-moving, downward trajectory for some time
now.
The question is no longer whether the U.S. government will be preyed upon and taken over by
the military industrial complex. That's a done deal, but martial law disguised as national
security is only one small part of the greater deception we've been fooled into believing is
for our own good.
How do you get a nation to docilely accept a police state? How do you persuade a populace to
accept metal detectors and pat downs in their schools, bag searches in their train stations,
tanks and military weaponry used by their small town police forces, surveillance cameras in
their traffic lights, police strip searches on their public roads, unwarranted blood draws at
drunk driving checkpoints, whole body scanners in their airports, and government agents
monitoring their communications?
Try to ram such a state of affairs down the throats of the populace, and you might find
yourself with a rebellion on your hands. Instead, you bombard them with constant color-coded
alerts, terrorize them with shootings and bomb threats in malls, schools, and sports arenas,
desensitize them with a steady diet of police violence, and sell the whole package to them as
being for their best interests.
This is not the language of a free people. This is the language of force.
Still, you can't say we weren't warned.
Back in 2008, an Army
War College report revealed that "widespread civil violence inside the United States would
force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic
order and human security." The 44-page report went on to warn that potential causes for such
civil unrest could include another terrorist attack, "unforeseen economic collapse, loss of
functioning political and legal order , purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency,
pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters."
In 2009, reports by the Department of Homeland Security surfaced that labeled right-wing
and left-wing activists and military veterans as extremists (a.k.a. terrorists) and called
on the government to subject such targeted individuals to full-fledged pre-crime surveillance.
Almost a decade later, after spending billions to fight terrorism, the DHS concluded that the
greater threat is not ISIS but domestic right-wing extremism .
Meanwhile, the police have been transformed into extensions of the military while the nation
itself has been transformed into a battlefield. This is what a state of undeclared martial law
looks like, when you can be arrested, tasered, shot, brutalized and in some cases killed merely
for not complying with a government agent's order or not complying fast enough. This hasn't
just been happening in crime-ridden inner cities. It's been happening all across the
country.
Rounding out this profit-driven campaign to turn American citizens into enemy combatants
(and America into a battlefield) is a technology sector that has been colluding with the
government to create a Big Brother that is all-knowing, all-seeing
and inescapable . It's not just the drones,
fusion centers , license plate readers, stingray devices and the NSA that you have to worry
about. You're also being tracked by the black boxes in your
cars , your cell phone, smart devices in your home, grocery loyalty cards, social media
accounts, credit cards, streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon, and e-book reader
accounts.
So you see, January 6 and its aftermath provided the government and its corporate
technocrats the perfect excuse to show off all of the powers they've been amassing so
assiduously over the years.
Mind you, by "government," I'm not referring to the highly partisan, two-party bureaucracy
of the Republicans and Democrats.
I'm referring to "government" with a capital "G," the entrenched Deep State that is
unaffected by elections, unaltered by populist movements, and has set itself beyond the reach
of the law.
I'm referring to the corporatized, militarized, entrenched bureaucracy that is fully
operational and staffed by unelected officials who are, in essence, running the country and
calling the shots in Washington DC, no matter who sits in the White House.
This is the hidden face of a government that has no respect for the freedom of its
citizenry.
Brace yourself.
There is something being concocted in the dens of power, far beyond the public eye, and it
doesn't bode well for the future of this country.
Anytime you have an entire nation so mesmerized by the antics of the political ruling class
that they are oblivious to all else, you'd better beware.
Anytime you have a government that operates in the shadows, speaks in a language of force,
and rules by fiat, you'd better beware.
And anytime you have a government so far removed from its people as to ensure that they are
never seen, heard or heeded by those elected to represent them, you'd better beware.
All of those dastardly seeds we have allowed the government to sow under the guise of
national security are bearing demon fruit.
The gravest threat facing us as a nation is not extremism but despotism, exercised by a
ruling class whose only allegiance is to power and money.
Feature photo | Two White House Marine stand at the front doors at the US Capitol ahead of
President-elect Joe Biden's inauguration ceremony, Jan. 20, 2021, in Washington. The door was
damaged from last week's violent protest. Jim Lo Scalzo | Pool via AP
"... If not for the "new normal" we 100% would guarantee a new war – or a restarted old war – within a year. As it stands, we're only 60% sure they'll be some kind of military intervention sometime soon (Venezuela wouldn't be a surprise). ..."
"... The real crackdowns are going to be domestic. There is a huge push to take "domestic terrorism" seriously , and that will go hand-in-hand with increased purges of social media (again with "Russian disinformation" playing a major role). ..."
"... I wonder if the military occupation was designed to disguise the total lack of support, given the evidence of election fraud. You couldn't get more emptiness and virtual absence of reality if the military conducted the installation in a bunker in the dying days of the Reich. ..."
"... Another poster said it looked like a junta in a minor banana dictatorship. Spot on. It was a military installation visually and in a political sense for there were no people. ..."
This particular inauguration is going to look a lot different from all the others –
the twin bogus narratives of coronavirus and the "attempted
coup" on January 6th have forced, FORCED, capitol city into an almost Martial Law-like
standing.
A heavy troop presence as your leader is sworn in is one of the hallmarks of legitimacy, you
understand. And not even slightly a sign of power being seized illegitimately.
That said, Biden will technically be "President", so it's time to ask ourselves –
what kind of world are we in for?
Internationally it's likely to be business as usual. If you look at his cabinet choices,
from
Victoria Nuland to
Samantha power , we have a LOT of warmongers who bleat about America's "responsibility to
protect". While politicians and pundits are already rebuking Trump & Johnson for failing in
US/UK's
"moral leadership" of the world, or praising Biden for his plans to "counter Russian
disinformation".
If not for the "new normal" we 100% would guarantee a new war – or a restarted old war
– within a year. As it stands, we're only 60% sure they'll be some kind of military
intervention sometime soon (Venezuela wouldn't be a surprise).
The real crackdowns are going to be domestic. There is a huge push to take "domestic
terrorism" seriously , and that will go hand-in-hand with increased purges of social media
(again with "Russian
disinformation" playing a major role).
The big question is whether the inauguration will go off smoothly, or they'll try another
manufactured incident to sell that agenda.
How do you think President Creepy Uncle Joe is going to shape our world? How long before,
for whatever reason, Kamala Harris replaces him? Will the pandemic be "solved"? Will we have a
new war? Discuss below.
Jan 21, 2021 2:24 AM
Washington DC was empty except for the troops. Windblown streets. Jason Goodman did his
walkabout could not even get a distant view of the Capitol. It's as if no one voted for Biden: no supporters even tried to attend the inauguration. You would have expected someone a few diehards who hadn't heard about the military
occupation.
I wonder if the military occupation was designed to disguise the total lack of support,
given the evidence of election fraud. You couldn't get more emptiness and virtual absence of
reality if the military conducted the installation in a bunker in the dying days of the
Reich.
Another poster said it looked like a junta in a minor banana dictatorship. Spot on. It was a
military installation visually and in a political sense for there were no people.
An inauguration of the leader of a nation cannot be legitimate if the people play no part
.
Celebrities cheered with exaggerated leering grins and lockjaw, tongues lolling in a vain
caricature of support from the class of paid actors.
The term 'State Actor' has a new meaning today. The Corporatist Media could not recognise
its own banality. This was like the USSR Actors' Union huddling and fawning around Secretary
General Brezhnev as the Soviet Union teetered to collapse.
Social cretinism is the best one can say about this sorry debacle but I fear it is something
much, much worse.
Disillusioned Peasant , Jan 21, 2021 2:38 AM Reply to theobalt
Agreed, Trump was used as a puppet to shame anybody who questions the narrative or resists
the deep state. He was asked to be a cartoon, a ridiculous exaggeration of a "traditionalist"
or "nationalist" to forever tarnish that stance. He was basically the Alex Jones president
.the ultimate controlled opposition. A clown.
I'm so embarrassed I fell for it in 2016. Of COURSE he was phony. Jan 21, 2021 1:39 AM
The snake as a new head. It's still the same snake. It still crawls on it's belly and it
still spits the same lies on behalf of the masters who stand behind the curtain. We could
still hear Bush Sr when Clinton spoke ; We could still hear Bush Jr when Obama spoke. Red and
Blue are the same colour.
It was refreshing in parts to have an American president who didn't try to contrive a
narrative that would justify invading another country or contrive yet another cell of
'radicalised' terrorists. No explosions on home soil intended to be taken as an attack from
foreign soil. Nothing in four years.
It was all the more surprising as many believed that Trump was and is a great real estate
dealer and TV celebrity who has manufactured his charisma from arrogance and ignorance. He
has never been celebrated for much beyond his business acumen in the real estate area and TV.
This wasn't exactly an erudite man. Former presidents of different ages were and were capable
of putting it on paper in their memoirs. Trump was the sign of the times ; a Twitter
president. His reign was punctuated by the occasional flexing of Uncle Sam's muscles with
threats and a go -ahead-punk-make-our-day approach to public speaking. Yet still no
threats of war. This was an odd four years. That odd = peace says more about the US than
Trump though. So, what was his role ?
In 2001 we had the Twin Towers. The most dramatic mass murder and the destruction of the
laws of Physics and Logic all in one day. Soon after we had the destruction of personal
freedom and the creation of domestic terror. It had been suggested by Philip Zelikow three
years earlier that a 'searing event such as a terror attack' would be a useful and
effective tool in transforming the future by breaking away from the past in no uncertain
terms. It would be the event that nobody dare question, and that would be perfect for
creating a real fear within the people of the west that such a disaster could occur any time
without warning. All they needed was the right salesman to address us.
And so the Patriot Act was born. The surveillance of everyone in their streets, in other
towns and their homes was pushed through as a public health measure and a matter of
national security. If you protested you were a ' 9 /11 denier' and 'unpatriotic'. If
we went too long without evidence of this terror then somewhere would be bombed and the
bomber would be 'neutralised' before we would ever learn who was behind it. It took time to
become a 'new normal' but it became the 'new normal'. Complain- you were a 'dangerous'
conspiracy theorist; in some states it was considered grounds to label you under the mental
health act. Just for asking questions.This was how to protect democracy- by
tyranny.
So, two decades on we were ready and primed.
Gates and his cohort billionaire 'philanderers' had been beavering away for decades
creating more subtle forms of terror. No bangs; no smoke; no mess. These 'missiles'
were microbes and the control groups had been observed closely. From mice, to bats to black
people to gay people. Once the results /data became big enough numbers, the bomb factory went
to work behind the closed doors of 'Cancer Research ' facilities.
We all know now about the hypothetical exercises 'imagined' by the Gates 'Good
Club' ; nightmares of being unprepared etc. They penned in 2030 as target date for the
endgame. . A date that will have seen the human race enslaved or culled by their
terrorism.
Liability would have been taken off the table, giving them free reign. All involved sank
their pennies into the manufacturing of these little bombs. And all Academic Institutions,
MSM platforms, and pharmaceutical industries were funded by Gates and Co. Then
Monsanto and it's subsidiaries were purchased the same way, and the same immunity from
prosecution granted from the damaging synthetic /poison crops and food.
So, 2020, was Trump's last stand. He had his '9 /11'. He had domestic bio
terrorists. Then the rest of the world had it. We had the same threats to national
security and the same 'need' for a new version of a Dystopian Patriot Act.
This wasn't about ISIS or Al -Qaeda and their radicalised lunatics. Trump had found a new
group of Bogeymen. China. He would have sounded a bit paranoid if Russia was blamed for
something again. Besides, everyone knows that all SARS- type or flu-like viruses are made in
China quicker and cheaper. And the US should know that by looking in their many, many
stockpiles in their own Biological War labs they pretend are trying to cure
cancer.
Trump decided to refer to the Covid 19 virus as 'The Chinese disease '. Fang
Ling Fauci had told him to on behalf of Wong Sing Gates.
He went on to call himself a 'war time president' ( there you go- he got one).
He invoked the Defence Production Act, an old Cold War law which allows the Executive
Branch to control and redirect the production and distribution of scarce materials deemed
"essential to the national defense. " In an executive order dated March 18th,
2020.
To add another layer to the movie the troops were brought in and all medics were now
'heroes on the front line'.
The script went global. It began in the country that Gates had composed such a
hypothetical scenario- America. Hence the 'Chinese Disease'. It was the new war on terror
minus the James Bond bad guy Bin Laden.
So Trump ushered it in right on time. It didn't win the election( we were told). Instead,
it won it for Obama's man, Biden.
Biden and Obama were the most vehement advocates of Monsanto, Sterilisation, and Social
Technology ( eugenics ; social cleansing). Obama was made a very wealthy man for his
services to the Gates agenda, pharma and GM / Frankenfood. He was surprisingly racist
as well as elitist. Tom Vilsack was their frontman. Biden has already called him out of
retirement.
So, given the 'war-on-(bio)-terror ' that was born in the USA and sold worldwide,
there was no place for Trump. His job was to let the the 'enemy' in, warn us of the possible
'war ahead' and leave it to Gates. But Trump seemed to have spotted that and didn't
seem too keen on the narrative. So, come on down Barack O Biden. The timing's right.. Jan 20,
2021 11:40 PM Reply to Ben
Do not be bamboozled, in SHAM DEMOCRACY USA there is only one party, THE
REPUBLICRATS (the WAR RACKETEER CORPORATE FASCIST political racket so corrupt it needs two
aliases).
"This struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, and it may be both moral
and physical, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never
did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have
found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these
will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of
tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress."
~ Frederick Douglas, 1857
Schmitz Katze , Jan 20, 2021 10:44 PM
„That said, Biden will technically be "President", so it's time to ask ourselves
– what kind of world are we in for? –
The real crackdowns are going to be domestic.-
Will the pandemic be "solved"? „
It will only be solved when people have had enough of it. The deep state got rid of Trump
(for the timebeing-) under the guise of a pandemic. For them and their minions in MSM,
government and academia it´s a gift that keeps on giving, with never ending corona
mutation fearporn.
It´s totalitarianism, it´s dystopia under under the guise of –
domestic-safety.
"... Did not Trumpstein promise to lead the march to the Capitol Building ..but instead snuck off to his limo and scurried back to the safety of the White House to watch the farce he encouraged on TV? No balls to go along with no brains. ..."
"... With his gift for bullshit and demagoguery, he could handily siphon off 60% of the R base i.e. the aggrieved rube demographic and the hideous Chrissie morons. Of course, there would be a bit of risk ask the Kennedy family. ..."
Did not Trumpstein promise to lead the march to the Capitol Building ..but instead snuck off
to his limo and scurried back to the safety of the White House to watch the farce he encouraged
on TV? No balls to go along with no brains.
He could even now form a Populist third party and easily bury the Rs, just as the Rs buried
the Whigs 170 years ago. With his gift for bullshit and demagoguery, he could handily siphon
off 60% of the R base i.e. the aggrieved rube demographic and the hideous Chrissie morons. Of
course, there would be a bit of risk ask the Kennedy family.
Biden winning was not enough. Trump remains a convenient boogeyman for the left, and they
will never stop reminding us of their worst fantasies about him as it provides such a low bar
for Biden to step over as president. He will remain victorious and scandal-free in their eyes
no matter how much government spending grows, no matter how messy foreign policy gets, no
matter the lies he tells because, hey, he's not Trump.
Biden's words of "unity" and "healing" are just words because his most public
supporters have their sights locked on a man who has lost the very power they said made him so
dangerous. They will support any aggressive moves made by the Senate, Biden's Justice
Department, and social media companies to target Trump or his supporters, no matter the
consequences, because their Trump Derangement Syndrome has become chronic, and remains a key
part of their worldview.
Biden's presidency will not change the tune of the media or the culture. Trump will remain
the bad guy and conservatives will pay the price for this. They continue to be the cultural and
political enemy in the eyes of the media and Trump critics, which makes so-called
"unity" nothing more than a mirage that has already been dispelled by the left's very
words.
RTaccount 1 hour ago 20 Jan, 2021 06:51 PM
They rejected the results of the 2016 election. They stole the 2020 election. And now they
are threatening conservatives. We do not need another election in this country.
Skeptic076 46 minutes ago 20 Jan, 2021 07:14 PM
It is up to the people to work together, to create any unity. It can only be recommended by a
president and others. Personally I think there is too much hate and division in the country,
fueled by media and conspiracy theory lies, for any unity to ever happen. Sad, but true. This
article is an example, one written
CuttySark Skeptic076 18 minutes ago 20 Jan, 2021 07:41 PM
For any unity to have a chance there has to be at least an olive branch extended. Instead
there are only shaken fists.
Count_Cash 1 hour ago 20 Jan, 2021 06:25 PM
The US is now just Ukraine with unlimited credit. They will be marching with liberal
torches and banning conservative language - oh they are already!
We begged Trump to get rid of him many months ago. Same with Wray. Without justice you
have no society and no Constitution. Halper came into the CIA by Brennan. Should have gotten
rid of her many months ago. These are Trumps biggest mistakes.
Sessions, Barr, Wray, Haspel, Coates, Krebs... Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Coney-Barrett... even
his SC Justice picks are suspect at this point. Honestly, it's pathetic!
"... He made a mockery of the media, stood tall until the final days of his presidency against a self-congratulatory bureaucracy and forced out into the open the depths of the depravity of our ruling class. I friggin' love the guy for that. ..."
"... He's just a placeholder for a system I no longer have any affinity for. Trump always represented a big two-fingers up to that system, which too many conservatives helped Trump prop up for four years. ..."
"... breathless headlines portending a violent assault on the Capitol was the height of political theater. And they know this. ..."
"... The two weeks since the staged assault on the Capitol saw Trump pile-driven in the ground by a vengeful GOP leadership while obviously having his arm twisted behind the scenes. ..."
"... This was the plan. Trump needed to finally be defeated. His followers humiliated. There was never going to be an Assange pardon. There was never going to be a big declassification. He was never allowed to burn the place down. ..."
"... And this is why I'm happy Trump is gone. Because did you really want to live through another four years of pathetic virtue signaling, bureaucratic inertia, media lies and shameful pandering? ..."
"... Trump was ultimately a failure in what he promised, but he delivered in exposing politics for the world wide wrestling federation entity that is is. Not sure if he meant to, but he did it. He showed us the behind the scenes tapes. ..."
I'm relieved Donald Trump is no longer President. In fact, I'm downright ecstatic. This is
the best I've felt in weeks.
Trump was four years of faint hope, failed promises and false narratives.
Oh, don't get me wrong he was also entertaining as hell, did many things I fundamentally
agreed with and accelerated the collapse of the biggest, most corrupt organization ever
created in human history.
He made a mockery of the media, stood tall until the final days of his presidency against
a self-congratulatory bureaucracy and forced out into the open the depths of the depravity of
our ruling class. I friggin' love the guy for that.
But I'm also over it. It's time to move on. Today I feel no nostalgia for Trump or America
1.0.
I refuse to go into the same hysterical theatrics the Left did four years ago. Biden's the
president. The restoration is complete. He was selected no different than every president
other than Trump since Reagan. I have as much emotion for him as I had for Bush the Lesser, Clinton the Rapist or Obama the
CIA mole
He's just a placeholder for a system I no longer have any affinity for. Trump always
represented a big two-fingers up to that system, which too many conservatives helped Trump
prop up for four years.
One of my patrons posted a stray thought in our community on Slack that sums things up
perfectly:
"Just think if Trump had won fairly and the "steal" hadn't happened. We'd have had
another 4 inept years of placeholding and false hope.
What a godsend that the steal happened as it has decoupled the people from the political
establishments and freed them. Ok, so the Great Reset's happening but who cares?
Everybody knows about it.
Necessity is the mother of invention and as long as people "feel" free then they aren't
free. That's how it's worked up until now. The decoupling had to happen somehow."
This is the law of unintended consequences writ large. Today should be looked at with
relief for the clarity of vision we have for the future. It will suck, but at least there is
symmetry.
In the end they stole the election to regain control and doing so set the stage for a
wholesale rejection of their authority.
Too many conservatives still believed in the Myth of
America . That should stop today.
The lead up to the inauguration with all of the pearl clutching, troop movements,
breathless headlines portending a violent assault on the Capitol was the height of political
theater. And they know this.
There's no putting that genie back in the bottle. This is a picture that encapsulates everything wrong with post-Trump America. Symbols of
America but no Americans. Military and pols everywhere but no governed giving their consent. Image systems matter folks and the world is watching the U.S. transition from a Republic
into an Autocracy. I guess Gil Scott Heron was wrong, the revolution will be televised after
all.
The two weeks since the staged assault on the Capitol saw Trump pile-driven in the ground
by a vengeful GOP leadership while obviously having his arm twisted behind the scenes.
People who should know better can't see through their own coping.
What did they think trust-fund Donald was going to do? Fall on his sword for a
whistleblower/journalist? Trump is, after all, still just Trump.
This was the plan. Trump needed to finally be defeated. His followers humiliated. There
was never going to be an Assange pardon. There was never going to be a big declassification. He was never allowed to burn the place down.
If any of that was going to happen it would have happened ages ago.
And this is why I'm happy Trump is gone. Because did you really want to live through
another four years of pathetic virtue signaling, bureaucratic inertia, media lies and
shameful pandering?
No, today the collapse of the U.S. will be on the watch of the people who orchestrated it.
It won't have the consent of a majority of the people, but if we were really honest with
ourselves that's how it was under Obama, Bush the Lesser and Clinton.
Trump was a guy who made things interesting but he also ensured we would be disabused of
any notion of dissidence. Today is the day Trump supporters can finally grow up. He wasn't Orange Jesus sent to save
America from itself. There was never a plan. Trump was just a guy in over his head doing something no President did since Calvin
Coolidge, giving a shit about what America means for Americans. That's why he had to be destroyed and that's why we ultimately have to put him behind
us.
As the U.S. sinks and what's left of the legal protections we've enjoyed are taken away
under the guise of 'domestic terrorism' we are also, strangely, free. That's why I'm ecstatic a man more fit for Andrew Cuomo's COVID Death Parlors is president
today rather than Trump. Everyone's eyes are now open. A fungus is president.
Absent the false hope of Trump people are now free to conclude what I always have --
politics got us into this, politics will not get us out. We can finally put the childish Red vs. Blue behind us. That false duality is gone. The
GOP is dead. The Democrats are ready to knife each other climbing to the pinnacle. They both
hate us.
The Capitol knows it is under siege, not from right-wing militias and neo-Nazis but from
their own fear of our not feeling anything for them anymore except maybe pity. So, raise a glass to Trump, wish him well, accept his limitations. The Empire is back with
a vengeance. The
Brave New Post-Trump World is here. And that has never been a more exhilarating thought.
Donate to the podcast via crypto:
BTC: 3GSkAe8PhENyMWQb7orjtnJK9VX8mMf7Zf
BCH: qq9pvwq26d8fjfk0f6k5mmnn09vzkmeh3sffxd6ryt
DCR: DsV2x4kJ4gWCPSpHmS4czbLz2fJNqms78oE
DASH: XjWQKXJuxYzaNV6WMC4zhuQ43uBw8mN4Va
XLM: GC4S6XUG6CGI7DLKFTLCUKIKYS3BHYE56AF7BQRIWX5EZM355JQYDRHD 6,747 40 NEVER MISS THE NEWS
THAT MATTERS MOST
Spetzco 26 minutes ago remove link
Well, at first I was angry reading this. Then...with a bit more thought and
contemplation, I realised this is probably the best analysis of the truth any of us is
going to read. 100% agree with every word.
argoz 3 minutes ago
The saying cheaters never prosper may apply to the next 4 years. Like the fall of the
Roman empire, they are becoming desperate.
LetThemEatRand 28 minutes ago (Edited)
Our instincts were right to vote for Trump. He exposed the deep state and the uniparty.
He took away the heroin from the addict just long enough for the addict to look in the
mirror before the next hit. And the other options were Hillary and Biden.
But can the addict clean itself up? The odds are against us. The dealer just came
through the door with all kinds of promises and threats.
BLOTTO 53 seconds ago
"The American public has realized that we are in control, which is a fatal mistake on
our part. The problem is not the tool or device, but the heathen in control of it. This is the
revelation that will be our undoing."
-Harold W. Rosenthal, the Hidden Tyranny 1973
BLOTTO 10 minutes ago remove link
"It is an established rule to destroy all members of pre-existing government, their
families and relatives but never ****. They destroy all members of the police, state
police, army officers and their families but never ****. You see, we know when a government
begins to search for the Communists within its borders -- they are really attempting to
uncover **** in their area. We're not fooled! The invisible rulers in the Communist
countries have a world control over the propaganda and the governments in free
countries.
We control every media of expression including newspapers, magazines, radio and
television. Even your music!"
-The Hidden Tyranny, HRW
Tonights musical entertainment by the *tars was enchanting.
homeskillet 25 minutes ago (Edited)
Horse hockey - he is a Zionist and part of the whole charade. That said, I'd still
rather have him in there than Biden.
LetThemEatRand 19 minutes ago remove link
Trump was ultimately a failure in what he promised, but he delivered in exposing
politics for the world wide wrestling federation entity that is is. Not sure if he meant
to, but he did it. He showed us the behind the scenes tapes.
mtanimal 11 minutes ago (Edited)
Obama the Enigma? How about Obama the CIA asset...
It's weird that these people are such bad negotiators that they diminish their negotiating posture BEFORE negotiating.
Why not demand the full $2000 and have the republicans be the obstacle to it? It's so stupid and makes no sense
Its Biden you took his word and conveyed it to people. He is a career liar you just spouted his words. Your no liar sir but
you are naive for believing in Biden and telling others they could too.
Trump the Manchurian Populist
He made a joke of foreign policy restraint (his restraint is worse than Obama's 'war') and he
ruined the career of good people like McGregor. McGregor is now toxic because of Trump.
Trump's domestic policies failed. He gave us $8T of new debt.
Operation Warp speed had a warp core
breach . What happened to the 300M doses we were supposed to have in Jan, we only have
30M doses, where did the reserve go?
Yeah, this "America First" so-called "populist" also weaponized space, doubled-down on
Israel and ME idiocy, supported a coup in Venezuela (including seizing Venezuelan State
assets), cut taxes (yet again), and lied about the seriousness of the virus.
Oh, and no pardon for Assange or Snowden to support whistle-blowers and independent
journalism that keep the Deep State (that Trump supposedly fights) in check.
"... No examination of Neoliberalism's utter failure to deliver benefits to the masses while expropriating the wealth they produced for delivery to the class of Financial Parasites. At least the writers at Global Times get it right: ..."
Global
Times reports on an essay published by the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine
Zeitung (Check it out b or other German barflies) deeming " China's system, although
'authoritarian,' is 'very successful .'" [My Emphasis]
"It explained that as long as a society can reach the following goals - improving social
welfare, increasing consumption choices, safeguarding domestic security, promoting education,
and providing good healthcare - people will support and trust the system even if their
influence in the decision-making process is limited. Such can 'in part ensure the legitimacy'
of the social system....
"But the authors' introspection stopped from digging problems as they tried to shift blame
to the rise of populism in the US."
No examination of Neoliberalism's utter failure to deliver benefits to the masses
while expropriating the wealth they produced for delivery to the class of Financial
Parasites. At least the writers at Global Times get it right:
"Populism, which helped crown Donald Trump, is being blamed today. Yet it all started
from the widening gap between rich and poor. When German scholars use the US populist
government as a scapegoat, they overlooked the real question - without addressing the
growing inequality in a Western system, will there be a second Trump in the future?" [My
Emphasis]
The fatal thrust is delivered in the two closing paragraphs but still omit naming the
actual culprit, which is the ideology of Neoliberalism:
"The article raised the support and trust of people when it comes to judgment over the
legitimacy of a society. In this regard, data speak louder than words. According to a poll
conducted in 2020 by US-based global public relations and marketing consultancy firm Edelman,
95 percent of Chinese trust their government while the US government only saw an approval of
48 percent .
"What other excuses will the Western world have to question the legitimacy of the Chinese
system? If the West, especially the US, the beacon of democracy, actually senses the crisis
and does not wish to lose the competition, it should stop burying its head in the sand." [My
Emphasis]
The problem isn't heads being buried in sand; rather, it's the design of the ideology to
exploit and degrade a nation's masses so they're left with relatively nothing compared to the
nation's Financial Parasites, all so the latter will always have their Free Unearned
Lunch.
"... In fairness, people on both sides are struggling to deal with this novel impeachment. While I have stated that I do not wish to serve as the president's counsel, I have spoken to members of Congress and the White House on the historical and constitutional backgrounds for a trial. From a purely strategic perspective, I believe Trump may be wise to skip any trial. ..."
"... First, he was denied due process when the House held an unprecedented "snap impeachment" without a hearing or inquiry even though a trial likely would not occur immediately. ..."
"... Second, the impeachment article is poorly crafted and poorly conceived, built around assertions that Trump's Jan. 6 speech to supporters was an "incitement to insurrection." His speech raised potentially impeachable grounds; I condemned it as he gave it and opposed his challenge of electoral votes from the outset. But as I wrote previously , it would have been far better to censure him for it in a bipartisan, bicameral resolution. ..."
"... He can legitimately argue that a private citizen cannot be impeached and that the Senate cannot remove a person from office who has already left. ..."
Vice President-elect Kamala Harris assures us the Senate can politically "multitask" to deal with an impeachment, an incoming
Biden administration and a pandemic.
However, the threshold question is whether this is constitutionally one of those tasks -- and for soon-to-be citizen
Donald Trump , the best defense may be no defense at all.
In fairness, people on both sides are struggling to deal with this novel impeachment. While I have stated that I do not wish
to serve as the president's counsel, I have spoken to members of Congress and the White House on the historical and constitutional
backgrounds for a trial. From a purely strategic perspective, I believe Trump may be wise to skip any trial.
For a notorious counterpuncher, avoiding a fight might be the most difficult decision of all, particularly because he has obvious
defenses.
First, he was denied due process when the House held an unprecedented "snap impeachment" without a hearing or inquiry even
though a trial likely would not occur immediately.
Even a one-day hearing would have allowed evidence to be discussed as well as a formal request for a response.
Second, the impeachment article is poorly crafted and poorly conceived, built around assertions that Trump's Jan. 6 speech
to supporters was an "incitement to insurrection." His speech raised potentially impeachable grounds; I condemned it as he gave
it and opposed his challenge of electoral votes from the outset. But as I
wrote previously , it
would have been far better to censure him for it in a bipartisan, bicameral resolution.
While impeachment can be based on noncriminal grounds, Trump's speech alone did not amount to criminal incitement. Absent direct
evidence of intent, a criminal charge would likely collapse in an actual trial or on appeal on First Amendment grounds. Trump
expressly called for his supporters "to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." He told them to go to the Capitol
"to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," to "fight like hell" to challenge the election, and to remind unsupportive
Republicans that their actions would not be forgotten. It was a reckless speech -- but, in a court of law, it would constitute
protected speech.
Despite the strength of such defenses, the president must first decide whether he wants to sit for trial at all. He can legitimately
argue that a private citizen cannot be impeached and that the Senate cannot remove a person from office who has already left.
Article I, Section 4, of the Constitution states that the sole purpose of an impeachment trial is whether "the president, vice
president and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office." While the Senate can later add a disqualification
from holding federal office again, that is only after removal is decided -- because it is a question of the penalty, not the purpose
of the proceeding.
The Constitution refers to a present-tense status of "the president." That status is key to other provisions bestowing official
powers and privileges, which do not linger after leaving office. No one would argue that Trump could continue to exercise those powers
once President-elect Biden is sworn in. Yet a Senate trial would insist that, while Trump has no continuing powers, he remains subject
to continued penalties tied to the office. Moreover, the stated purpose of the impeachment trial is whether a president "shall be
removed." Thus, the only person constitutionally subject to an impeachment trial would be the sitting president, Joe Biden.
This issue has been debated since the first impeachment in 1797, when Sen. William Blount of Tennessee faced allegations of conspiring
to help Great Britain seize what is now Louisiana. Blount was expelled from the Senate before being impeached, so he insisted he
was not subject to trial and refused to appear. The Senate apparently agreed and dismissed the case -- just 10 years after the Constitution's
ratification, with most of the Framers still alive and some serving in Congress. (Indeed, Blount was one of its signers.)
The second case fared little better. In 1876, former Secretary of War William Belknap was tried even though he resigned before
being impeached. Almost half of the senators voted that they did not have jurisdiction, and Belknap was later acquitted, in part
due to doubts over the trial's legitimacy.
The absence of a defendant or defense counsel might not be the only curious element in this trial. It is unclear, for example,
if Chief Justice John Roberts would be called upon to preside. After all, the Constitution stipulates that when "the President of
the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside" -- but the president will be Biden, not Trump.
The failure to put on a defense is not an admission of guilt. The Senate has a duty to resolve whether there is a valid impeachment
trial to be held and then whether the constitutional standard has been satisfied. If the Senate does not dismiss the case in a threshold
vote, Trump can treat the proceeding as an extraconstitutional act because he is no longer subject to removal. If the Senate were
to convict, he would have standing to challenge any disqualification from future federal offices. He could well prevail, and the
Senate would have created a precedent against itself: history's first judicial reversal of an impeachment verdict.
Courts have long maintained that impeachments are left to Congress. Yet this is different. This is a question of whether a private
citizen can be subjected to a proceeding that is expressly committed to the removal of officeholders. Impeachments go to the status
of an officeholder, while indictments go to the status of an individual. If prosecutors believe Trump incited insurrection, they
should charge him. However, the Senate must decide if it wants to hold a trial based on a legal fiction: a vote to remove someone
who is no longer in office.
Trump, politically, proved to be complete and upper idiot, who just self-destructed. To the
applause from the neoliberal Dems.The blunder with his behaviour of Dec 6 is inexcusable and
might well be a set up. But Buchanan is right: neoliberal
Dems now own the mess and they have no plans other the to kick the can down the road. Which
probably will lead to further impoverishment of "deplorables"
It looks like from a certain point the events of Dec 6 were orchestrated by the neoliberal
wing of Democratic Party. Although initially this might well be plotted by Trump supporters,
who got into this trap. But later with "invasion" of Capitol building was used as a gambit by
the neoliberal wing of the Democratic Party to crush the opposition and destroy Trump as a
political leader of Republican Party. Which actually is a positive thing -- Trump definitely
outlived his usefulness.
At least it is now clear that the security of the Capitol was artificially degraded to the
level unacceptable for such events. Also there was strange period of "inaction" both by city
authorities (which command substantial and well equipped police force; as of early March, the
department had 3,805 officers. ) and Pentagon. But DC major did nothing while she was capable
to send at least 2K reinforcement. They also have helicopters and A Communications Division
Command Post vehicles, which can be used for coordination of police actions, and armed vehicles
which could be used to cut the the rest of the mob from the building. Which always has instant
demoralizing affect on attackers much like opening of the second front in real wars. Nothing
was done despite direct TV translation form the place of events.
That mob that split off from the Donald Trump rally of Jan. 6 to invade the Capitol has
proven a godsend to the left.
The death of a Capitol cop has enabled the left -- which spent the summer after George
Floyd's death trashing "racist cops" and shouting, "Defund the Police!" -- to posture as
fighting allies of the men in blue.
Neoliberals who implored us to understand the grievances of the rioters, looters and
arsonists last summer have become sudden converts to the church of law and order.
Elites who had condoned the smashing of statues and monuments to Columbus, Washington,
Jefferson and Jackson as a needed cleansing of our hateful history have declared themselves
sickened that Trumpists would desecrate the temple of democracy.
Had it been antifa or BLM that carried out the invasion, not one statue would have been
left standing in Statuary Hall, and we would have been instructed that it was slaves who had,
after all, built the Capitol building.
The media is airing endless footage of the mob marauding inside the Capitol. Purpose: to
plant indelibly in the public mind the fiction that this was the deliberate work of Donald
Trump and his people, and our elites are the real adversaries of violent protest.
Indeed, to protect the nation from rightist uprisings in state capitals, this weekend saw
the widespread deployment of the National Guard.
Sunday was to be the day the murderous violence of the right would manifest itself.
What happened? As The Washington Post reported Monday:
... ... ...
In anticipation of Wednesday's inauguration, 25,000 National Guard have been deployed in
and around D.C. to defend against right-wing mobs or would-be assassins. Three or four times
as many troops are here in D.C. as there are U.S. troops in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria
combined.
Now, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. And better too much security than
not enough. But even given the Jan. 6 outrage, to arm our capital city as though Stonewall
Jackson's Confederates were going to march up Manassas Road and capture Abe Lincoln after the
Union defeat at Bull Run seems a bit excessive.
Yet, Wednesday is a historic day. Trump will be gone from the White House and national
power and responsibility will pass to the Democratic Party.
Democrats take over the House, Senate and White House. Virtually all major media will be
in their camp. They will be welcomed in a city that has never elected a Republican mayor and
has no Republicans on the city council, a city that voted for Joe Biden 18-1 over Trump. The
30,000 registered Republicans in D.C. are outnumbered 12-1 by Democrats.
The government bureaucracies here are as deeply Democratic as the "deep state" that
bedeviled Trump for four years. Biden's Cabinet is the most racially and ethnically diverse
ever; the majority of its members are women and people of color. Obama administration
holdovers dominate the national security team.
Most of America's major cities -- New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Atlanta, D.C.,
Baltimore, Detroit, St. Louis -- are run by neoliberal Democrats, and, coincidentally, all
experienced surges in shootings and killings in 2020.
While the figures on the criminal perpetrators are rarely reported, it appears that not a
great many of the violent and lethal crimes were the work of rogue cops or white supremacists
in MAGA hats.
Other problems Trump failed to solve -- the pandemic now killing 3,000 to 4,000 Americans
a day, the failure to get vaccines into the arms of millions of more Americans -- are now
Joe's problems.
Calling Trump names will no longer cut it.
Now, Democrats must decide whether to proceed with the impeachment trial of Trump for
inciting a riot that began on the Capitol steps as he was speaking a mile away, a riot
planned long before the rally on the Mall.
Now, Democrats can choose whether they will forego extracting their pound of flesh as the
first order of business in the Senate and let Nancy Pelosi sit a while on her impeachment
resolution.
Now, Democrats have it all. If they wish, they can abolish the filibuster, pack the
Supreme Court, make D.C. and Puerto Rico states, forgive all student debt, and vote for
slavery reparations.
One reads that a caravan of thousands is forming up in Honduras to pass through Guatemala
in the hope of reaching and crossing the U.S. border when Biden becomes president.
That, too, is Joe's party's problem now.
y_arrow
cankles' server 35 minutes ago
As Greenwald said, it's easy for the neocons to switch because the D's are now the party
of "militarism, imperialism, and corporatism."
just_looking 2 hours ago
There was plenty of evidence. Courts would not let into the record, using excuse of "No
Standing" - so would not let case proceed.
Why couldnt the fighure out who did have standing, and proceed that way?
I hate to say it, but Republicans are not equipped to deal with the sort of war the Dems
fight. The Dems (Hillary) are (sadly) way better at this.
Invert This, Media Matters Monkeys 2 hours ago
That doesn't matter to the Cabal. Look at the Warren and 9/11 Commission reports. They
are an insult to your intelligence. They don't even care if the sheep believe them as long
as they control the narrative and retain power.
You_Cant_Quit_Me 2 hours ago (Edited)
It's clear the law & order crowd only applies if you are white. The FBI did
absolutely nothing when federal properties were being destroyed by BLM protestors, the FBI
did nothing when businesses were vandalized, looted, and burnt. And all at once our
democracy is at stake when protestors on Jan 6th shot no one, burned nothing, and was
overall peaceful
SCREW ME!
just_looking 2 hours ago
I think they have arrested more people from Jan 6 Capital Hill protest - than all the
looters, in all the cities, all summer combined. And all those arrested for Capital Hill
protest had jobs!
"... In fairness, people on both sides are struggling to deal with this novel impeachment. While I have stated that I do not wish to serve as the president's counsel, I have spoken to members of Congress and the White House on the historical and constitutional backgrounds for a trial. From a purely strategic perspective, I believe Trump may be wise to skip any trial. ..."
"... First, he was denied due process when the House held an unprecedented "snap impeachment" without a hearing or inquiry even though a trial likely would not occur immediately. ..."
"... Second, the impeachment article is poorly crafted and poorly conceived, built around assertions that Trump's Jan. 6 speech to supporters was an "incitement to insurrection." His speech raised potentially impeachable grounds; I condemned it as he gave it and opposed his challenge of electoral votes from the outset. But as I wrote previously , it would have been far better to censure him for it in a bipartisan, bicameral resolution. ..."
"... He can legitimately argue that a private citizen cannot be impeached and that the Senate cannot remove a person from office who has already left. ..."
Vice President-elect Kamala Harris assures us the Senate can politically "multitask" to deal with an impeachment, an incoming
Biden administration and a pandemic.
However, the threshold question is whether this is constitutionally one of those tasks -- and for soon-to-be citizen
Donald Trump , the best defense may be no defense at all.
In fairness, people on both sides are struggling to deal with this novel impeachment. While I have stated that I do not wish
to serve as the president's counsel, I have spoken to members of Congress and the White House on the historical and constitutional
backgrounds for a trial. From a purely strategic perspective, I believe Trump may be wise to skip any trial.
For a notorious counterpuncher, avoiding a fight might be the most difficult decision of all, particularly because he has obvious
defenses.
First, he was denied due process when the House held an unprecedented "snap impeachment" without a hearing or inquiry even
though a trial likely would not occur immediately.
Even a one-day hearing would have allowed evidence to be discussed as well as a formal request for a response.
Second, the impeachment article is poorly crafted and poorly conceived, built around assertions that Trump's Jan. 6 speech
to supporters was an "incitement to insurrection." His speech raised potentially impeachable grounds; I condemned it as he gave
it and opposed his challenge of electoral votes from the outset. But as I
wrote previously , it
would have been far better to censure him for it in a bipartisan, bicameral resolution.
While impeachment can be based on noncriminal grounds, Trump's speech alone did not amount to criminal incitement. Absent direct
evidence of intent, a criminal charge would likely collapse in an actual trial or on appeal on First Amendment grounds. Trump
expressly called for his supporters "to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." He told them to go to the Capitol
"to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," to "fight like hell" to challenge the election, and to remind unsupportive
Republicans that their actions would not be forgotten. It was a reckless speech -- but, in a court of law, it would constitute
protected speech.
Despite the strength of such defenses, the president must first decide whether he wants to sit for trial at all. He can legitimately
argue that a private citizen cannot be impeached and that the Senate cannot remove a person from office who has already left.
Article I, Section 4, of the Constitution states that the sole purpose of an impeachment trial is whether "the president, vice
president and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office." While the Senate can later add a disqualification
from holding federal office again, that is only after removal is decided -- because it is a question of the penalty, not the purpose
of the proceeding.
The Constitution refers to a present-tense status of "the president." That status is key to other provisions bestowing official
powers and privileges, which do not linger after leaving office. No one would argue that Trump could continue to exercise those powers
once President-elect Biden is sworn in. Yet a Senate trial would insist that, while Trump has no continuing powers, he remains subject
to continued penalties tied to the office. Moreover, the stated purpose of the impeachment trial is whether a president "shall be
removed." Thus, the only person constitutionally subject to an impeachment trial would be the sitting president, Joe Biden.
This issue has been debated since the first impeachment in 1797, when Sen. William Blount of Tennessee faced allegations of conspiring
to help Great Britain seize what is now Louisiana. Blount was expelled from the Senate before being impeached, so he insisted he
was not subject to trial and refused to appear. The Senate apparently agreed and dismissed the case -- just 10 years after the Constitution's
ratification, with most of the Framers still alive and some serving in Congress. (Indeed, Blount was one of its signers.)
The second case fared little better. In 1876, former Secretary of War William Belknap was tried even though he resigned before
being impeached. Almost half of the senators voted that they did not have jurisdiction, and Belknap was later acquitted, in part
due to doubts over the trial's legitimacy.
The absence of a defendant or defense counsel might not be the only curious element in this trial. It is unclear, for example,
if Chief Justice John Roberts would be called upon to preside. After all, the Constitution stipulates that when "the President of
the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside" -- but the president will be Biden, not Trump.
The failure to put on a defense is not an admission of guilt. The Senate has a duty to resolve whether there is a valid impeachment
trial to be held and then whether the constitutional standard has been satisfied. If the Senate does not dismiss the case in a threshold
vote, Trump can treat the proceeding as an extraconstitutional act because he is no longer subject to removal. If the Senate were
to convict, he would have standing to challenge any disqualification from future federal offices. He could well prevail, and the
Senate would have created a precedent against itself: history's first judicial reversal of an impeachment verdict.
Courts have long maintained that impeachments are left to Congress. Yet this is different. This is a question of whether a private
citizen can be subjected to a proceeding that is expressly committed to the removal of officeholders. Impeachments go to the status
of an officeholder, while indictments go to the status of an individual. If prosecutors believe Trump incited insurrection, they
should charge him. However, the Senate must decide if it wants to hold a trial based on a legal fiction: a vote to remove someone
who is no longer in office.
On Jan. 6, 2021, a right-wing mob of a few hundred people broke away from a peaceful
right-wing protest involving tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of American conservatives and
forced its way into the U.S. Capitol. One Capitol policeman was killed after being hit in the
head with a fire extinguisher, and one of the right-wing Capitol invaders was shot by a Capitol
police officer. (A handful of others who died in the vicinity of the Capitol did so of
nonviolent causes.) Aside from smashed windows, the mob seems to have done little damage to
the Capitol. Their intent is still not clear. It seems to have been largely catharsis. They
hurt no legislators, and if they intended to overthrow the government, they were
delusional.
Beginning the next day, the American neoliberals used the Capitol mob just as the Nazis used
the Reichstag: as an excuse to subjugate its conservative enemies and further squelch civil
liberties in America – specifically, freedom of speech.
Twitter not only permanently banned the account of president of the United States but
permanently banned him from Twitter. Any Twitter account found tweeting Donald Trump was
permanently banned.
The neoliberals was able to do all this not only by using the Capitol mob incident but also
by engaging in a series of lies.
The first was blaming the attack on President Donald Trump. Over and over, in every
neoliberals MSM, Trump is blamed for "inciting" the riot in his speech just before it took
place. Almost never is a Trump quote cited. Because there is none. On the contrary, he did say,
"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully
and patriotically make your voices heard" (italics added).
Another lie was the immediate labeling of the mob attack on the Capitol as "insurrection."
All neoliberals MSM and Democratic politicans now refer to the event as an "insurrection," a
term defined by almost every dictionary as "an act or instance of revolting against civil
authority or an established government." As morally repulsive as the actions of the mob were,
they did not constitute a revolt against civil authority or an established government.
Disrupting the work of legislators for a few hours – as wrong as that was – does
not constitute a "revolt."
But what proves the neoliberals's "insurrection" label is a lie is that Democrats and their
media never labeled the riots of summer of 2020 – which involved the destruction by fire
and/or occupation and vandalizing of police stations, and the establishment of "autonomous
zones," which, by definition, revolted against "established governments" – as an
"insurrection." The number of businesses burned down, looted or otherwise destroyed was barely
covered by the mainstream media, and their violent perpetrators were almost never prosecuted,
let alone condemned, as engaging in an insurrection. Dozens of people were killed in these
riots, yet there was more outcry and condemnation against the hours-long occupation of the U.S.
Capitol than against six months of violent riots.
Then, like the Nazi regime after the Reichstag fire, the neoliberals immediately moved to
further curtail civil liberties, specifically conservatives' ability to promote their ideas.
Twitter and Amazon made it impossible for the alternative to Twitter, Parler, to exist, all in
the name of preventing another right-wing "insurrection."
Ok. Let's assume that we have conspiracy. But who was the head of this conspiracy. It was not
Trump... We should apply Cue bono question to all this story.
The evidence of a conspiracy having take that is available to the public at the time of this
writing is as follows:
Capitol Hill police chief Steven Sund
said House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving declined to declare an emergency before the
demonstration. He also revealed that "Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger suggested that
Sund informally seek his Guard contacts, asking them to 'lean forward' and be on alert in
case Capitol Police needed their help."
Sund said that he requested backup six times prior to and during the mob storming the
Capitol. All three have since resigned.
Sund also said that his frantic request to the Pentagon for national guard deployment
after the pro-Trump mob had already overrun police forces and entered the Capitol building
was rejected, even as it was being broadcast around the world.
This is why Q Anon came on the scene, sponsored by some real government intel just enough to
prove it was inside information to mislead you into apathy while they cement power and bide
time to create contingency plans behind the scenes.
Ralph Nader is tryting to sell his agenda. But some of his observations are interesting:
"Last week, the powerful National Association of Manufacturers demanded that Trump be removed
from office under the 25th Amendment. " In other words neoliberal corporations dumped Trump.
Trump's business allies and supporters are not waiting for any verdicts. Major corporations
such as Disney, Coca-Cola, and J.P. Morgan Chase have suspended campaign contributions to the
GOP. Last week, the powerful National Association of Manufacturers demanded that Trump be
removed from office under the 25th Amendment. Trump's banks, to whom he owes hundreds of
millions of dollars, are distancing themselves from their insatiable borrower. New York City
has canceled its contract with the Trump corporation. More cancellations of deals with TRUMP,
Inc. will come.
Though verbally defiant, admitting no mistakes, and as usual taking no responsibility, Trump
is a broken man, assailing his most loyal subjects including total toady Vice President Mike
Pence. Deprived of his Twitter machine and other Internet platforms, Trump will soon be a
besieged debtor, a manyfold investigated and sued defendant abandoned by the likes of Mitch
McConnell.
The calculus of political survival for the just re-elected McConnell's Congressional
Republicans has changed. In the minority, no longer will Republicans be able to confirm
corporatist judges or pass Trump-like corporate tax cuts for the super-rich, or dismantle
health and safety regulations.
But out on the MAGA hustings, Trump may be a huge tormentor, raising money and wanting to
run again. Such a prospect is intolerable to McConnell. That is why he is turning against Trump
by declining to oppose Impeachment and signaling that he may unleash his Republican Senators to
convict Trump, if only for their own political survival...
To convict Trump, the Senate trial, if it were not a completely political exercise, should
have to determine if his words at the rally on Wednesday broke federal law, which states in
18 U.S. Code § 373 – "Solicitation to commit a crime of violence":
"Whoever, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony that
has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against
property or against the person of another in violation of the laws of the United States,
and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, solicits, commands, induces,
or otherwise endeavors to persuade such other person to engage in such conduct, shall be
imprisoned "
About 30,000 Trump supporters filled the Ellipse between the back of the White House and
the Washington Monument. According to the
transcript of his remarks, Trump said:
"These people are not going to take it any longer. They're not going to take it any
longer. All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened
radical left Democrats and stolen by the fake news media. We will never give up. We will
never concede, it doesn't happen. You don't concede when there's theft involved.
Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that's what this is all
about. To use a favorite term that all of you people really came up with, we will stop the
steal. We're gathered together in the heart of our nation's Capitol for one very, very
basic and simple reason, to save our democracy . we're going to have somebody in there that
should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we're not going to stand for
that.
You're stronger, you're smarter. You've got more going than anybody, and they try and
demean everybody having to do with us, and you're the real people. Unbelievable, what we
have to go through, what we have to go through and you have to get your people to fight. If
they don't fight, we have to primary the hell out of the ones that don't fight. You primary
them .
Now it is up to Congress to confront this egregious assault on our democracy. After
this, we're going to walk down and I'll be there with you. We're going to walk down. We're
going to walk down any one you want, but I think right here.
We're going walk down to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our brave senators,
and congressmen and women. We're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them
because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and
you have to be strong
I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to
peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.
Today we will see whether Republicans stand strong for integrity of our elections, but
whether or not they stand strong for our country, our country. The radical left knows
exactly what they're doing. They're ruthless and it's time that somebody did something
about it. And Mike Pence, I hope you're going to stand up for the good of our constitution
and for the good of our country.
So we're going to, we're going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue, I love Pennsylvania
Avenue, and we're going to the Capitol and we're going to try and give our Republicans, the
weak ones, because the strong ones don't need any of our help, we're going to try and give
them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country."
At times the crowd chanted, "Fight for Trump! Fight for Trump! Fight for Trump!"
Are these words by Trump "strongly corroborative" of an "intent that another person engage
in conduct constituting a felony," an intent that " solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise
endeavors to persuade such other person to engage in such conduct?"?
Or were these just the fighting words of a politician, directed almost entirely at fellow
Republicans? He said: "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol
building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." [Emphasis
added.]
When he said the Democrats were "ruthless" and "it's time that somebody did something
about it" he was referring to Pence and the Republicans sending the electoral college votes
back to key states. That is the entire context of his more than one hour speech. When he said
"you have to get your people to fight," he meant Republican representatives who would have to
be primaried.
With no proof so far that Trump had prior knowledge of the plan to take over the Capitol,
or evidence of direct instructions from him to do so, it would seem difficult to convict him
in a court of law, but maybe not in a political trial in the Senate.
Before Trump spoke, Donald Trump Jr., who acted like he's preparing to run for office,
whipped up the crowd saying that Wednesday was the day to prove "if you are a hero or a
zero." But he was not referring to the supporters, but to Republicans in Congress who he was
demanding vote against certifying election results from key swing states.
Rudy Giuliani, likewise used a strange phrase, "combat justice," but in the context of
continuing to challenge the computer results of the election. Trump's people already filed 62
electoral fraud lawsuits across the country, and lost them all.
Whether or not it would be sufficient evidence to convict him, it was troubling that Trump
took several hours before he called on the rioters to leave the Capitol and afterward tweeted
"Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!"
Another confirmation that Trump is a mediocre politician who walked into the trap. Now he is
history. The movement against neoliberalism that was hijacked by Trump also will suffer being
branded as "white nationalists". So Trump betrayed his supporters again.
Notable quotes:
"... Investigative reporter Greg Palast and photojournalist Zach D. Roberts have covered the issues of vote suppression and right wing violence for two decades in reports for Rolling Stone, The Guardian and Democracy Now! ..."
"... Ali Alexander is a phony who has managed to work his way into MAGA Circles. He is an intel asset and everything he has ever done to "assist" MAGA Organizations created disharmony and violence. The MAGA Movement has always been about non-violence and support for the military and law enforcement. Ali's appearances are always well arranged so that he is perfectly framed by fake news cameras as he calls for violence. Hence, we see him very clearly saying "We're going to burn this shit down". ..."
"... Am I the only one who thinks this riot was allowed to happen? For weeks Trump had been telling his base the election was stolen. Everyone was talking about what Trump might do to try to hold on to power. ..."
"... The NSA surveils everyone. The FBI infiltrates all extremist groups. Are you seriously trying to tell me the capitol was taken by surprise? FFS it was all over Twitter! This was allowed to happen. This was allowed to happen!! Why? Because 2020 was the year that people took to the streets again. Not since Nixon's time have we seen so many people take to the streets. Back then it was anti-Vietnam war protesters and civil rights protesters. Nixon launched the "war on drugs" as a way to control those groups. ..."
"... They allowed it to happen so they can pass The Patriot Act 2.0. Biden is already talking about new powers for the state and police to tackle the threat of "domestic terrorism". The people have good reason to uprise. Financial inequality not seen in 100 years, jobs not coming back, massive personal debt, lack of healthcare during a pandemic, etc., etc. Meanwhile the elites massively expand their wealth. ..."
"... I love most of what you publish, but any excuse for DC not being prepared for this march is preposterous. They new it was being planned even without a permit. They saw the people arriving. And they did not bother to prepare despite all the issues Palast lists above. Trump must be accountable, but Congress and the rest of the government must share the blame. Every large peace march I have attended in Washington (since 1969) has moved down cordoned off routes with police in riot gear looking like armed aliens or perhaps beetles in their armor surrounding the capital. So there is no excuse for their not responding to this event appropriately. ..."
"... ...while the democrats sit around freaking over Trump – who will leave office in a week – who is writing the bill to rescue the American people from a complete economic meltdown. ..."
"... Although there is good research in this article, I find it impossible to determine, at this point, the actors involved. The "protest" and its aftermath have all the hallmarks of a planned psyops provocation that would and has justified the calling for an increased security state that will further erode free speech and demonize, then prosecute anyone who disagrees with the corporate fascist neoliberal elites who control the deep state and its propaganda arm-the legacy media (MSM) and now the censorship of monopoly social media, with the control of reality and history determined corporate controlled searches online of selective if not altered "facts". This is true of all search engines as well as wikipedia. ..."
"... Only Paul Jay has suggested that Trump walked into a trap set by McConnel, Pence and Graham, but Dems are profiting as well. I don't care if Trump fragrantly told the crowd to burn the capitol down, there should have been a police response other than selfies. I don't believe that Trump was responsible for the severe lack of a police presence and until we know who was responsible for that (you can bet we will never be told) we cannot hold those responsible for the events of that day. Trump was an instigator but not the ultimate cause of what happened. ..."
The permit issued by the U.S. Interior Department, which has jurisdiction over federal
parkland, says: "Women for America First will not conduct an organized march from the Ellipse
at the conclusion of the rally." It adds, "Some participants may leave to attend rallies at the
United States Capitol to hear results of Congressional certification of the Electoral College
count." But an "organized march" was not allowed.
... ... ...
The insider claims that Woman for America First was quite worried that they had no marshals
to keep the crowd in line. "We did advocate against [the march] for all kinds of reasons. So,
excuse me , it's not a big stretch to say when you have a bunch of people heading that
way, it's going to be a problem."
The first news that there would be, despite warnings, an illegal, uncontrolled march was at
12:15 pm when Trump himself surprised the protest organizers with his announcement. "I know
that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and
patriotically make your voices heard," Trump said.
The march on the Capitol was set in motion when the President announced he himself would
join it . "The announcement that he was going to go was news to us," the insider said.
"But then [Trump] said he's walking! It caught our team by surprise and unprepared."
Alex Jones stated on his podcast that he and Alexander were called by the White House just
before the president's speech and were told to prepare to lead the crowd on a march.
"We had a legitimate deal with the White House," Jones said in an InfoWars show
filmed with Alexander after the riot. "'Hey Jones and Ali,' literally, with Alexander, we were
supposed to lead a peaceful deal."
... ... ...
Investigative reporter Greg Palast and photojournalist Zach D. Roberts have covered the
issues of vote suppression and right wing violence for two decades in reports for Rolling
Stone, The Guardian and Democracy Now!
Following is my comment, which was attached to your YouTube plug for this article. Shame
on Greg Palast. I always trusted him until now. He knows the above story is FAKE NEWS and, if
he doesn't, he's not really an investigative reporter. There's plenty of video evidence out
there Greg. Why did you just happen to fail to do your job on this story?
-- -- -- -- -- –
Ali Alexander is a phony who has managed to work his way into MAGA Circles. He is an intel
asset and everything he has ever done to "assist" MAGA Organizations created disharmony and
violence. The MAGA Movement has always been about non-violence and support for the military
and law enforcement. Ali's appearances are always well arranged so that he is perfectly
framed by fake news cameras as he calls for violence. Hence, we see him very clearly saying
"We're going to burn this shit down".
In the case of the first big spontaneous Trump Rally, in DC, following the election, the
term #Stopthesteal.org was used by the female organizers of a bus tour across the US. Ali
then obtained the same domain name with a different address, #stopthesteal.us" and even
copy/pasted some of their original artwork. Before people had been alerted, Ali managed to
scam at least $30K from decent people before the scam was exposed. He then showed up and led
a counter rally that incited violence at the Capitol Building. He was unsuccessful on that
day, because no one from the Trump Movement would go with him.
Then, in Georgia, he managed to show up on a stage behind Attorneys, L. Lin Wood and
Sidney Powell. After they spoke and left the peaceful rally, most of the people went home.
Still, Ali incited violence among a group of trained false flag intel assets and managed to
damage the reputations of Wood and Powell, who did not know him. They have since been advised
regarding his role playing, as has the President who was once seen in a photo op with Ali,
who is known as "Scammy Davis" around Maga Circles because of his resemblance to former "Rat
Pack" Member, Sammy Davis, Jr.
On January 6th, Ali again teamed up with Alex Jones, who is also an asset of the Deep
State, but he apparently ripped Jones off and Jones has since denounced him. Jones has spoken
about this in detail, but one never knows with Jones, since he's a compromised asset and will
work for either side to avoid exposure. That's how these people operate, through blackmail.
I'm no fan of Alex Jones, but I have NEVER heard him advocate violence and he doesn't
actually advocate violence in the video.
I always loved Greg Palast, but either he is missing the story on this one or he is yet
another disinformation asset, who will be exposed in the near future. That would be a shame,
but we are finding that out about a lot of people that were once trusted. Ali and Jones are
just players in a much bigger game, which will be exposed to the world, beginning this
week.
Note to Greg: This story makes you and Consortium News look foolish. Perhaps you should go
to Toresays or ToreSaysNews on YouTube and find about Ali from an asset that came in from the
cold. Her shows are long, but you're an investigative reporter. Take the time to listen to a
few of her shows before you start "exposing" Ali as a MAGA Supporter.
Note to the Reader: I supported Bernie Sanders in 2016, with my money and my primary vote.
I held my nose and voted for Trump rather than vote for a WAR CRIMINAL who had stolen the
nomination. As a former Federal Manager, who fought my Agency for eight years, lost
everything and even started a union as my departure gift, I come from the "left". However,
this term is no longer valid, since the Deep State has people working both sides of a phony
left/right paradigm.
Finally, I'm not an investigative reporter, but I know how to do research beyond the
staged mainstream footage, which Mr. Palast conveniently used for this story. Moreover,
there's a lot of footage out there and more will be released this week, since there were
undercover military assets among the vandals who recorded their activities. Some of it is
already in the MSM Greg. How did you miss it?
The bigger story, which is also being missed, is this: Trump and company have just pulled
off the greatest sting in history and we will all have a front row seat on January 20, so get
your popcorn and tune in. In fact, arrests have already been made and many more are coming.
Ali may already have been arrested, but we won't know for a while.
Neil Youngson , January 16, 2021 at 03:07
Am I the only one who thinks this riot was allowed to happen? For weeks Trump had been
telling his base the election was stolen. Everyone was talking about what Trump might do to
try to hold on to power.
The NSA surveils everyone. The FBI infiltrates all extremist groups. Are you seriously
trying to tell me the capitol was taken by surprise? FFS it was all over Twitter! This was allowed to happen. This was allowed to happen!! Why? Because 2020 was the year that people took to the streets again. Not since
Nixon's time have we seen so many people take to the streets. Back then it was anti-Vietnam
war protesters and civil rights protesters. Nixon launched the "war on drugs" as a way to
control those groups.
The one thing the establishment fears the most is the people taking to the streets and
building guillotines (ask the French).
They allowed it to happen so they can pass The Patriot Act 2.0. Biden is already
talking about new powers for the state and police to tackle the threat of "domestic
terrorism". The people have good reason to uprise. Financial inequality not seen in 100 years,
jobs not coming back, massive personal debt, lack of healthcare during a pandemic, etc., etc.
Meanwhile the elites massively expand their wealth.
It's a class struggle. Don't fall into the trap of blaming Trump, the whole establishment
is your enemy.
I love most of what you publish, but any excuse for DC not being prepared for this march
is preposterous. They new it was being planned even without a permit. They saw the people
arriving. And they did not bother to prepare despite all the issues Palast lists above.
Trump must be accountable, but Congress and the rest of the government must share the blame.
Every large peace march I have attended in Washington (since 1969) has moved down cordoned
off routes with police in riot gear looking like armed aliens or perhaps beetles in their
armor surrounding the capital. So there is no excuse for their not responding to this event
appropriately.
Apparently there were such severe threats on social media that the tech giants felt
compelled to actually take down Parler, one of the sites where the protesters congregated.
But they knew about this in advance, and far more planning went on in google and facebook
groups. So, Trump was out of line, but the rest of the DC establishment made a decision to
take advantage of this moment of excess rather than contain it...
...while the democrats sit around freaking over Trump – who will leave office in
a week – who is writing the bill to rescue the American people from a complete economic
meltdown. Who is minding the affairs of state. Who is addressing the real problems that
have incited riots on both the left and right by desperate people? Not congress. And the
blogosphere is drowning in Trump Trump Trump Trump . Trump Trump Trump Trump well, you get
it.
Charles Cox , January 15, 2021 at 18:54
Although there is good research in this article, I find it impossible to determine, at
this point, the actors involved. The "protest" and its aftermath have all the hallmarks of a
planned psyops provocation that would and has justified the calling for an increased security
state that will further erode free speech and demonize, then prosecute anyone who disagrees
with the corporate fascist neoliberal elites who control the deep state and its propaganda
arm-the legacy media (MSM) and now the censorship of monopoly social media, with the control
of reality and history determined corporate controlled searches online of selective if not
altered "facts". This is true of all search engines as well as wikipedia.
Jhoblho , January 15, 2021 at 15:00
Only Paul Jay has suggested that Trump walked into a trap set by McConnel, Pence and
Graham, but Dems are profiting as well. I don't care if Trump fragrantly told the crowd to
burn the capitol down, there should have been a police response other than selfies. I don't
believe that Trump was responsible for the severe lack of a police presence and until we know
who was responsible for that (you can bet we will never be told) we cannot hold those
responsible for the events of that day. Trump was an instigator but not the ultimate cause of
what happened.
"... The last scene in the video shows that the violent protest and takeover was about more than just the election. After trashing media equipment, one man says, "We gotta change it. They fucking abuse us. They laugh at us. They steal our money." ..."
T he U.S. Justice Department has reversed an earlier assertion in court by prosecutors that
protestors who broke into the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 had plans to "capture and assassinate
elected officials."
Instead, the head of the DOJ investigation into the Capitol siege
admitted that federal prosecutors filed a misleading statement before a federal judge in
Arizona that was intended to prevent Jacob Chansley, aka Jake Angeli, from being released on
bail.
The DOJ said that though there were calls to kill officials during the two-hour takeover of
the Capitol, no evidence has been discovered yet to prove any serious effort to carry out such
a plan.
"There is no direct evidence at this point of kill-capture teams and assassination," Michael
Sherwin, the Washington DC federal district attorney running the investigation of the attack,
told reporters, Agence France-Presse reported. Sherwin said it may be "appropriate" to raise it
at trial, but at this point it could "mislead the court."
The original story of intentions to kill officials has entered the media discourse and is
likely to remain a Democratic talking point despite the DOJ reversal. The only major media
outlets that
reported the new story is NBC News and The
Washington Post . It has not appeared in The New York Times or on CNN's
website, for instance.
Having saturated the public with days of lurid tales of intentions to hang Vice President
Mike Pence and abduct House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, it will be hard to shake such beliefs without
reporting the DOJ's reversal with the same intensity.
The original statement filed in court said: "Strong evidence, including Chansley's own words
and actions at the Capitol, supports that the intent of the Capitol rioters was to capture and
assassinate elected officials of the United States government."
There has been no suggestion that the prosecutors in Arizona who made the false claim are
being investigated for misleading the court.
The 'Coup'
Riot police at Capitol, Jan. 21, 2017 for Trump's inauguration. (Lorie Shaull/Wikimedia
Commons)
The admission dramatically changes the story, repeated as Democratic Party talking points,
and undermines the unquestioned certainty that what took place was an attempted coup against
the United States government. The new DOJ stance might also weaken efforts to charge Capitol
rioters and intruders with "seditious conspiracy" charges for allegedly attempting to overthrow
the government.
Consortium News has been among the few media outlets to
question the coup narrative from the start.
Even if there were such murderous intentions it would not have amounted to a coup attempt
without the backing of the military or paramilitaries, and without taking over the airport and
radio and TV stations. These days it would probably mean taking over social media companies
too. The U.S. government and media structures are vaster and more powerful than just the
legislature.
Even if the protestors had intended and succeeded in hanging Vice President Mike Pence
(presuming the gallows erected outside the Capitol was sturdy enough), and even if they had
taken Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and others hostage would Donald Trump have
said, "Okay, they didn't certify Biden, I'm still president!"?
No branch of government would have supported Trump in that case and the surviving members of
Congress would have met elsewhere to certify Joe Biden as president.
New Video Inside Capitol
Chansley, the far-right, bare-chested activist with fur headdress and Viking horns, became
the symbol of the brief takeover of the Capitol by Trump supporters. He was arrested and faces
a six-count federal indictment,
charged with:
Civil disorder Obstruction of an official proceeding Entering and
remaining in a restricted building Disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building
Violent entry and disorderly conduct in a Capitol building Parading, demonstrating, or
picketing in a Capitol Building
He is not charged with insurrection or sedition to overthrow the government.
Jacob Chandsley/ Qananon Shaman. (TheUnseen011101/Wikimedia Commons)
In a new video released on Sunday by The New Yorker, Chansley is seen grunting
primordial chants while playing to a photographer a few feet in front of him in a Senate
balcony. Later he seats himself in Pence's Senate chair.
After a single Capitol police officer pleads with the intruders to leave, Chansley leads the
group in prayer and then files out with the others, but not before scrawling on a piece of
paper on Pence's desk: "It's only a matter of time, justice is coming."
Before Chansley sat in it, the video
shows one of the protest leaders, dressed in military gear, demanding that the others not
occupy the vice president's chair. He says: "It's not our chair. I love you brothers, but we
cannot be disrespectful. It's a PR war, okay? You have to understand it's an IO war. We can't
lose the IO war. We're better than that. It's an Information Operation."
The video shows a couple of dozen protestors rifling through senators' desks looking for, in
the words of one, "something we can fucking use against these scumbags" and taking photos of
documents. At one point they thought they found evidence in Senator Ted Cruz's desk that he was
going to betray them on certification, but read further and realized he would not.
The film is interspersed with very violent scenes of police in riot gear trying to prevent
protestors from entering the Capitol.
The last scene in the video shows that the violent protest and takeover was about more
than just the election. After trashing media equipment, one man says, "We gotta change it. They
fucking abuse us. They laugh at us. They steal our money."
As journalist Chris Hedges said last Thursday, one can decry their
politics, the racism among many, and their tactics, but their pain is real in a system that has
shrunk the middle class and debased workers.
What happened at the Capitol cannot be condoned. But unless Congress defies its oligarchic
backers and serves the interests of average Americans, who also fund them, a real insurrection
may be inevitable. Instead of the reforms to defuse that and bring more economic justice, we
are witnessing a crackdown that will only further inflame the country.
Joe Lauria is editor-in-chief ofConsortium Newsand a former UN
correspondent forThe Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe,
and numerous other newspapers. He was an investigative reporter for theSunday
Timesof London and began his professional career as a stringer forThe
New York Times.He can be reached at [email protected] and followed on Twitter
@unjoe .
rosemerry , January 18, 2021 at 13:15
It is interesting that both sides of the House and Senate manage almost all the time to
arrange that other countries they have decided are enemies or rivals have real "coups" and
takeovers helped by the mighty US . Iraq, Syria,Libya,Venezuela are just a few of the recent
examples, but they are not "USA USA" so they do not count.
rosemerry , January 18, 2021 at 13:07
No surprise that the "paper of record" NYT did not bother to mention this legal angle. The
descriptions I have seen in European papers and in the Sycophant aka the Guardian hardly vary
at all and scream the alleged danger to the poor Congress members.
Anne , January 18, 2021 at 14:25
Nor NPR .Indeed they didn't bother to mention the 1954 shootings in the US Capitol (House)
until AFTER the BBC World Service had and then a week later
Tim S. , January 18, 2021 at 12:54
Anyone who has watched the video filmed by the arch-instigator's would-be-journalist
sidekick can see for themselves that these were not even serious rioters, much less coup
plotters, who were surprised as everybody else about being allowed into the Capitol
building.
And despite some toy guns and one man with the slogan on the back of his jacket "God, guns,
and Trump), it is obvious from their panicky reactions when a woman was killed that they felt
deep down that this was all fun and games. She was trying to break down an interior door,
starting with the window, but when an agent inside pointed a pistol at her, she ignored it.
When he finally shot her, they all start yelling "She's been shot!" and react rather like a
bunch of bystanders.
Does that sound like a gang planning to kill some Congressmen and taken others
hostage?
Jonny James , January 18, 2021 at 11:48
Yes, once again the mainstream narrative stinks, and the fresh air is here on CN. That's
why we don't breathe the miasma of the corporate media.
The Divide and Rule strategies of the ruling classes are working nicely. We can't have the
"99%" get together to work against "the interests of Goldman Sachs" (Hedges). That is not
allowed. The rub is that both the so-called right and so-called left work for the interests
of Goldman Sachs.
I remember very clearly how brutally the peaceful Occupy protests were smashed. The
violent cops used armored vehicles and other military equipment, massive amounts of tear gas,
flash-bang grenades, drones, surveillance etc. etc. , Scott Horton was nearly killed by a
tear-gas canister fired directly at his head. You are not allowed to work against the
interests of the real owners of this country. As George Carlin once said, "they own the f-in
place".
Anne , January 18, 2021 at 14:35
I have yet to hear NPR mention anything about the woman who was shot dead (no weapon on
her) let alone who shot and killed her that she was ex-mil (thus trained to invade, destroy,
devastate, slaughter peoples, cultures, societies far, far, from these shores what you train
for and then deploy will eventually come back home and bite
John Drake , January 18, 2021 at 13:37
Agreed, I find the minimizing of this event truly putrid. What is it about an enraged
crowd, chanting "stop the steal" breaking into a building full of legislators , assaulting,
injuring police and scaring the ..t out of said elected legislators that is not an attempt to
overthrow, interfere, interrupt, prevent a key governmental process? This a governmental
process whose outcome they wanted to alter keeping the Orange Menace in power. A flight of
ridiculous fancy, no doubt, but still attitude, behavior and intent count.
Just because it doesn't rise to the level of well known coups orchestrated by
professionals (CIA): Honduras, Guatemala, Chile, Iran and hundreds more; doesn't mean it
doesn't belong in the same family of nasty socio/political events. Can we compromise and call
it a mini attempted coup or maybe mini coup-lite? Anyway the perpetrators and their enablers
need to major consequences; especially those officials that violated their oath of
office.
Am I the only one who thinks this riot was allowed to happen? For weeks Trump had been
telling his base the election was stolen. Everyone was talking about what Trump might do to
try to hold on to power.
The NSA surveils everyone. The FBI infiltrates all extremist groups. Are you seriously
trying to tell me the capitol was taken by surprise? FFS it was all over Twitter!
This was allowed to happen. This was allowed to happen!!
Why? Because 2020 was the year that people took to the streets again. Not since Nixon's
time have we seen so many people take to the streets. Back then it was anti-Vietnam war
protesters and civil rights protesters. Nixon launched the "war on drugs" as a way to control
those groups.
The one thing the establishment fears the most is the people taking to the streets and
building guillotines (ask the French).
They allowed it to happen so they can pass The Patriot Act 2.0. Biden is already
talking about new powers for the state and police to tackle the threat of "domestic
terrorism".
The people have good reason to uprise. Financial inequality not seen in 100 years, jobs
not coming back, massive personal debt, lack of healthcare during a pandemic, etc., etc.
Meanwhile the elites massively expand their wealth.
It's a class struggle. Don't fall into the trap of blaming Trump, the whole establishment
is your enemy.
I love most of what you publish, but any excuse for DC not being prepared for this march
is preposterous. They new it was being planned even without a permit. They saw the people
arriving . and they did not bother to prepare despite all the issues Palast lists above.
Trump must be accountable, but Congress and the rest of the government must share the blame.
Every large peace march I have attended in Washington (since 1969) has moved down cordoned
off routes with police in riot gear looking like armed aliens or perhaps beetles in their
armor surrounding the capital. So there is no excuse for their not responding to this event
appropriately.
Apparently there were such severe threats on social media that the tech giants felt
compelled to actually take down Parler, one of the sites where the protesters congregated.
But they knew about this in advance, and far more planning went on in google and facebook
groups. So, Trump was out of line, but the rest of the DC establishment made a decision to
take advantage of this moment of excess rather than contain it...
...while the democrats sit around freaking over Trump – who will leave office in
a week – who is writing the bill to rescue the American people from a complete economic
meltdown. Who is minding the affairs of state. Who is addressing the real problems that
have incited riots on both the left and right by desperate people? Not congress. And the
blogosphere is drowning in Trump Trump Trump Trump . Trump Trump Trump Trump well, you get
it.
Charles Cox , January 15, 2021 at 18:54
Although there is good research in this article, I find it impossible to determine, at
this point, the actors involved. The "protest" and its aftermath have all the hallmarks of a
planned psyops provocation that would and has justified the calling for an increased security
state that will further erode free speech and demonize, then prosecute anyone who disagrees
with the corporate fascist neoliberal elites who control the deep state and its propaganda
arm-the legacy media (MSM) and now the censorship of monopoly social media, with the control
of reality and history determined corporate controlled searches online of selective if not
altered "facts". This is true of all search engines as well as wikipedia.
Jhoblho , January 15, 2021 at 15:00
Only Paul Jay has suggested that Trump walked into a trap set by McConnel, Pence and
Graham, but Dems are profiting as well. I don't care if Trump fragrantly told the crowd to
burn the capitol down, there should have been a police response other than selfies.
I don't believe that Trump was responsible for the severe lack of a police presence and
until we know who was responsible for that (you can bet we will never be told) we cannot hold
those responsible for the events of that day. Trump was an instigator but not the ultimate
cause of what happened.
Jonny James , January 15, 2021 at 13:39
Equal application of the law? Please!
The "rule of law" is something of a joke in this country. War criminals are lavished with
praise and perks, rewarded with contracts and cushy jobs. For just one example: Henry K is
still alive, never prosecuted – he holds a Nobel Peace Prize for cryin out loud.
Bush Jr., Cheney and the gang were never prosecuted for the many high crimes they
committed, let alone the war crimes resulting in the destruction of entire countries and the
deaths of over a million innocent people.
Obama and HRC were never held accountable for war crimes and other illegal activities
either.
The largest financial crimes in US history were not even investigated, let alone
prosecuted. Instead the banksters were (and still are) REWARDED with trillions in public
funds and Fed Reserve "quantitative easing". However, millions lost their homes due to fraud,
but that's perfectly fine. The Banksters are Above The Law.
Police can murder black, brown and poor white folks with impunity. As servants to the
ruling class, police are given special privileges
The equal application of the law is simply not possible in our current system.
Sorry to be so skeptical, but Trump will likely never be held accountable.
I am in total agreement with you.
I also believe Trump had flagrant delicato information about many politicians on the Hill
from Epstein and Maxwell who are mysteriously absent from MSM.
The Empire of Shite is in its Death Knell.
The market will continue its rise post COVID-19 with history repeating itself and mirroring
the roaring twenties of 100 years ago.
Rome is in ashes.
It explains why the police were unprepared which seemed clear to me.
It confirms my view of chaos with the crowd and no central purpose other than to display
their unhappiness with events, with individual exceptions of course.
And it confirms the absolute lunatic recklessness of Trump.
Recklessness we have seen displayed many times from tearing up nuclear treaties and giving
away the property of others to the criminal abuse of Iran and China.
By the way, just a footnote, a recent study demonstrated that Trump's insane efforts with
China actually cost the US 245,000 jobs at one point. And yet his naive followers think he
was working for their good.
JoSixPack , January 15, 2021 at 09:02
So it was dangerous because they did not get a permit? Is a permit required to hold a
protest? Did the Black Lives Matters protests have permits?
See how that works. A lack of a permit does not make a protest dangerous.
It's also disingenuous to say this protest was not known about to the police or law
enforcement.
According to the ACLU,
"What if others react violently to a protest?
A speaker at a protest is not legally responsible for the presence of angry listeners, and
their hostile actions do not make the speaker's speech illegal. "
hXXps://www.aclu-wa.org/story/rights-protesters
Some parting words from John Pilger:
"The hysteria in the US about a coup that was not a coup, an "assault on democracy" that
was no such thing, is due to a cartoonish insularity that distracts from an unending
pre-Trump imperial assault on the rest of humanity, such as stricken Yemen."
There are real stories of bad things Trump has done. This is not one of them.
John R , January 15, 2021 at 08:38
They lacked a permit ? I look at the Trump directive to proceed to the Capital and fight
like hell as their "unofficial permit."
Mark Walker , January 15, 2021 at 11:33
So, no permit then.
Nixon tried this, "It's legal if the President does it." Didn't work for him or for
Reagan.
The "Rule of Law", "Law and Order" guy is on opposite day 24x7x365.
Sally Snyder , January 15, 2021 at 08:25
Here is an interesting look at how Americans view Donald Trump's links to the events on
Capitol Hill:
As is becoming typical of the United States, the events of last week are viewed completely
differently by each side of the massive political divide.
michae888 , January 15, 2021 at 06:34
Sounds much like when Democrats took Green parties off of ballots because of a change of
address of one of the candidates while collecting needed petition signatures (technicalities;
legal but unethical disenfranchisement).
The First Amendment says Congress shall make no law abridging the right of Americans "to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances". (Even Mexico "allowed" protests,
grudgingly, when AMLO's supporters flooded the streets after his first two losses.) What
percent of the George Floyd protests had permits? 93% of those protests– involving 10
million+ people– were peaceful (yet 78% of the arrests were not for violent crimes).
The George Floyd protesters destroyed national monuments and statures, a precedent, and did
much more damage generally (yet not one unarmed protester was shot to death by Police during
these protests).
I'm a life-long Democrat, but am appalled at the partisan CONTROL coming about through the
unholy alliance of the DNC, CIA, MSM and social media. I grew up in another world where
Freedom of Speech, dissent (often spirited, occasionally violent) and diversity of views were
valued. I remember when the CIA was not allowed to operate within the US, and all
Intelligence agencies were apolitical (at least for the Democrats and Republicans, who share
essentially the same corrupt values though they claim to detest each other). Now the CIA
demands other Five Eyes agencies do their dirty work within the US, and all Intelligence
Agencies have fought Trump (hate him or not) spying on him constantly and undermining his
campaign, somehow legally?
The "modernization" of Smith Mundt removed anti-propaganda restrictions, and it is clear
that on any important issue, an Official Narrative is handed down to MSM and enforced through
social media as well (and it's not just political; many of us retired scientists, physicians
and veterinarians were aghast at obvious mistakes(?) made with Covid-19, calling for
glucocorticoids and vitamin D3 and other things IN JANUARY, FEBRUARY and MARCH, which would
have saved lives (first peak death rate April 21st) but almost all dissenting views from the
WHO and Fauci and the CDC were taken down from social media and comments sections as
"MISINFORMATION".
Some of us were even barred from sites briefly; Fauci is an AIDS expert, but knew nothing
in January about Covid-19 and the Public Health measures which worked so well in Asia against
the virus.) As with the CIA, now LEGALLY controlling Narratives, censorship is not allowed by
the Government, BUT they can tell MSM who can tell social media who to censor. As SCOTUS has
ruled repeatedly: "HATE SPEECH IS FREE SPEECH!"
U.S. District Judge Barbara Rothstein doesn't think so, as a federal judge she has
violated the First Amendment by refusing to allow Parler to serve as a free speech publisher
with no moderation (censoring them). I have never been on that site and am sure it is
hateful, but it doesn't bother me, since they are not a publisher, just a free speech
platform. With the DNC/ CIA/ MSM/ social media chain making censoring "legal", maybe it will
soon be legal to kill people you disagree with (your wife?) provided similar chains of
corrupt actors can be established. The US already does this abroad.
Anne , January 16, 2021 at 11:40
I agree with much you have written and I support neither Face of the Janus Party Either
you have free speech or you don't. Either you have the right to protest or you don't. (I seem
to recall not too many months ago that the MSM were cheering on the Hong Kong rioters no
matter what they did, violent or not, including their closing down of the island's airport
for a day while beating up at least one journalist but hey what's good for the goose
apparently is not for the gander.)
And I too recall protests that were hardly peaceful – protests in good causes that
produced rioting, destruction of buildings and looting and what of 1968?
Moreover didn't one Lolita LeBron, a Puerto Rican nationalist and anti-colonialist, and a
handful of her compatriots enter the US Capitol and once in Congress, the pubic gallery (the
House, I think), and proceed to shoot the members – five sustained injuries
To pretend that nothing kindred to last week has happened in the US Capitol since 1812 is
to lie egregiously yes the Puerto Rican nationalists (too few) did not ransack the building
but there was an intent to maim if not kill
And the news regarding the one woman shot is totally absent (at least on NPR) she was ex
military who shot her?
Given that not a few of the people were ex military or the adult offspring of ex-mil
– what can be expected? You train people to kill others, especially others who do not
look like you, live differently, have a different culture and that training induces a totally
compunctionless attitude toward destruction, devastation of others and their homes,
livelihoods and so on when they come back home, why would they suddenly become humane again?
Suddenly regain empathy, sympathy? You've destroyed it within them to achieve your political,
economic, imperialist ends
This is the result: Chickens home to roost
Luchorpan , January 14, 2021 at 23:12
If Trump and Alexander are punished for this, then apply the law equally and punish the
huge number of anti-Trump, BLM, and antifa marches and protests. The law cannot be selective.
The impression people have is BLM, Antifa, and really any violent group useful to the
powers-that-be are given a free pass, that the law does not apply to them.
If big business, big government, big media, and the Democratic Party continue to unite
in violence against their enemies, productive people are just going to leave the US. Whether
you call it fascism or communism, it is wrong. And it is quite shocking how many on the Left
defend the violence in the US, makes it easier to understand how they can implicitly support
so many horrible and ongoing genocides overseas.
The 'Ides of March', they came early this year – on 6 January, at least for one
current U.S. 'Caesar'. What happened; how it happened; who concocted the Capitol events, will
be long debated. However, the daggers had long been sharpened for Caesar, well before the
invasion of the Capitol. In a sense, the stage was already set – Trump walked into the DC
'Forum', and ended 'stabbed to death', as had Julius. It has been truly Shakespearean.
It was well-known that Trump might well reject the election results, because of postal
ballot potential fraud (as postal ballots assumed their disproportionate 2020 electoral
predominance). The Transition Integrity Project (TIP)
precisely (purposefully?) had taunted Trump last June with its forecast of a contested
election in which Trump would lose – after "all of the mail-in ballots had been tallied".
The TIP then had turned to the prospective tactics and tasks for forcefully ousting a
President-in-denial from the White House. (The media and 'platforms' had been participants in
this early war-gaming of how to deal with a Trump, who contested the election result, and
questioned the legality and authenticity of postal ballots).
It needn't have been this way – but no compromise on rules on postal balloting was
attempted (rather, the reverse). In any event, the Capitol invasion now stands as a major
psychic event (the "Insurrection") searing the American consciousness. Apart from unnerving the
legislators, unused to experiencing a sudden loss of security, the invasion has become the
sacrilege to a 'sacred space' (with all the additional connotations of America's exceptional,
divine mission). The daggers were gleefully plunged in – Trump is impeached again; he is
to be tried in the Senate after the Biden inauguration; and he and his family, may expect the
legal dismemberment that will follow.
The 'Blue State' has – from Trump's first election – been determined to crush
him. That is underway. And somehow sychronistically, we now have the Tech digital deletion of
Red America from social platforms, with talk of a 'purge' and cultural 're-education' for his
supporters (and their children), as well. Biden is already speaking like a War President (and
the Capitol now has taken the air of a theatre of war, with troops and weapons strewn about its
corridors): "Trump", said Biden, "has
unleashed an all-out assault on our institutions of democracy, from the outset, and yesterday
was but the culmination of that unrelenting attack".
Here is the key first implication to that 'psychic event' – not just for Americans,
but for the world spectating the unfolding events: Biden has called for measures against
"domestic terrorism", and used language that is usually reserved for combat with an external
enemy state – language such as accompanies major wars. This is 'revenge cycle' material.
In the case of two nations, literally at war, they do do this. This is a part of it. They hope
to resolve their conflict through humiliation, repression and the forced submission of the
other (i.e. Japan after WW2). But America is, at least nominally, one nation. What happens when
a single nation splits, with one turning the 'seditious' elements into an 'alien other'?
We do not know. But hatred is intense, both toward Trump and the 'deplorables'. And now,
these sentiments are reciprocated in the wake of the President's humiliation, at a
contents-free impeachment, reached in few hours. What seems certain is that the course of
events likely will lead to a self-reinforcing cycle of ever greater polarisation.
The rise of Trumpism has created a new radical Manicheanism amongst the liberal
élite. Tech, with its algos feeding like-minded material to the like-minded, has a lot
to do with this digital and ideological divide. But the bottom line is that this divide is
(falsely) cast as a death-struggle now underway between a monolithic liberalism and a
monolithic illiberalism.
This comes at a time when Americans are now
reporting that they trust corporations more than they trust their own government or media,
when pundits are gleefully proclaiming in The New
York Times that "CEOs have become the fourth branch of government" as they pressure the
entire political system to smoothly install Biden, when the leading contender for the
Department of Justice's Antitrust Division is an Obama holdover who went from the
administration to working for both Amazon and Google, and when Americans are being
paced into accepting an increasing amount of authoritarian changes for their own good.
And this manic celebration and increasing brazenness of corporate power are of course
overlaid atop an unceasing river of human blood as the globe-spanning empire continues to smash
any nation which disobeys it into compliance so as to ensure lasting uncontested planetary
hegemony.
The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of
Consortium News.
DH Fabian , January 18, 2021 at 12:03
Yes, nervous middle classers pray Joe Biden will be their salvation. The rest of us know
why "business as usual" will continue. The only real difference between Biden and Trump is
that Biden is more likely to start a catastrophic war (as his record clearly indicates).
Jeff Harrison , January 17, 2021 at 23:17
Good points. Since Americans don't see any consequence to their government's outrageous
behavior, everything's outstanding (there are real benefits to those two oceans)! And it will
remain outstanding until someone shoves our bad behavior in our faces (which could really
happen. The Russians and Chinese are arming themselves to defend themselves from the US.
That's a lot cheaper than having to support a major offensive capability) or our brokeness
blows our economy to hell. You might want to read up on what happened to Sparta ..
No, I am not excited for the inauguration of a man who: Wrote the crime and bankruptcy
bills, voted for the Iraq War, took more money from Wall Street than Trump, and told a room of
rich donors that "nothing will fundamentally change." Democrats are part of the problem
too.
Looks like Trump is elevated well beyond his standing and abilities. He proved to be mediocre politician who got into
the prepared trap and endangered and then betrayed his supporters.
Notable quotes:
"... Four years ago the Anglo-American deep state concluded that liberal democracy is no longer guaranteed to keep them in power. The new threat comes from populist like Trump. Instead of democracy they decided to turn to totalitarianism. The first step was a totalitarian media regime . ..."
"... LMFAO. Trump is no threat. Listen to his farewell speech . Summary: bend over and salute the flag. ..."
Four years ago the Anglo-American deep state concluded that liberal democracy is no longer
guaranteed to keep them in power. The new threat comes from populist like Trump. Instead of democracy they decided to turn to totalitarianism. The first step was a
totalitarian media regime .
What a lie. The bombs being dropped from the U.S. made jets the Saudi pilots fly over Yemen
killing civilians leaves blood all over his hands not to mention shaking the hand of the
Saudi that murdered a journalist before selling him weapons to kill Yemen's civilians.
Waryaa Moxamad 48 minutes ago 19 Jan, 2021 05:36 PM
1) False flag chemical attack on Syria. 2) killing Soleimani in a sovereign country he was
invited to 3) Guaido 4) Bolivia. 5) continuing the wars predecessors started.
Who is being fooled that U.S. presidency has any say in America's imperialism?
Who really pushed for General Soleimani to be killed and has the most personal and intense
vendetta against Soleimani? Mike Pompeo. Trump did not give the Pentagon and CIA all the wars
they wanted, especially in Syria. Now the Pentagon and the CIA have their puppet, Corrupt
Biden, who will do what they command him to do. I would expect in one year to see another
massive war. Where? Syria. The US mothers will cry when their sons come home in coffins. The
Hez in Lebanon will not back down, and they will enter Syria again. Trump did not want young
American boys coming back in coffins!!!!!!!
If there must be a CIA, I feel better with Bill Burns being in charge of it.
William Burns in 2014 as U.S. deputy secretary of state. (State Department)
By John Kiriakou Special to Consortium News
P resident-elect Joe Biden has finally named a new CIA director, one of the final
senior-level appointees for his new administration. Much to the surprise of many of us who
follow these things, he named senior diplomat Williams Burns to the position. Burns is one of
the most highly-respected senior U.S. diplomats of the past three decades. He has ably served
presidents of both parties and is known as both a reformer and as a supporter of human
rights.
Burns is currently the president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, an
important Washington-based international affairs think tank. He served as deputy secretary of
state under President Barack Obama and was ambassador to Russia under President George W. Bush
and ambassador to Jordan under President Bill Clinton. He was instrumental in the negotiations
that led to the Iran Nuclear Deal and spent much of his career focused on the Middle East Peace
Process. Burns joined the Foreign Service in 1982.
Please
Contribute to Consortium
News ' Winter Fund Drive
"Bill Burns is an exemplary diplomat with decades of experience on the word stage keeping
our people and our country safe and secure. He shares my profound belief that intelligence
must be apolitical and that the dedicated intelligence professionals serving our nation
deserve our gratitude and respect. The American people will sleep soundly with him as our
next CIA Director."
The message from Biden is clear: The CIA will not be led by a political hack like Mike
Pompeo, a CIA insider like John Brennan, or someone associated with the CIA's crimes of
torture, secret prisons, or international renditions like Gina Haspel. Instead, the
organization will be led by someone with experience engaging across a negotiating table with
America's enemies, someone experienced in solving problems, rather than creating new ones,
someone who has dedicated much of his career to promoting peace, rather than to creating
war.
Rank & File Response
The question, though, is what will be the response from the CIA's rank-and-file to Burns'
appointment? I can tell you from my 15 years of experience at the CIA that there will be two
reactions. At the working level, analysts, operators, and others will continue their same level
of work no matter who the director is. Most working level officers don't even care who the
director is. It doesn't matter to them. They never encounter the director and policies made at
that top level generally don't impact them on a day-to-day basis.
At the senior levels, the leadership levels, CIA officers will be of two minds. Some will
welcome Burns and his professionalism. They'll welcome a director who doesn't attract adverse
press because of a past history of committing war crimes or crimes against humanity. (Even if
they supported those crimes when they were being committed, press attention is always
unwelcome.) They'll welcome a director who didn't head secret prisons overseas. They'll
welcome a director who wasn't in charge of Guantanamo. They'll welcome a director who
wasn't in charge of maintaining a secret "kill list."
Others will resent Burns, though, as they resented an earlier outsider, Admiral Stansfield
Turner. Turner had been appointed by President Jimmy Carter to "clean up" the CIA. Turner then
fired fully a third of the CIA's operations officers, some just months away from qualifying for
retirement. He was universally reviled after that, and he never regained the trust of agency
personnel.
That's not Burns' style. He's not a military officer who demands fealty. He's a diplomat, a
negotiator. The CIA has to be cleaned up. Its policies have to be reformed. If there must be a
CIA, I feel better with Bill Burns being in charge of it. At the very least, we should give him
enough time to at least get started.
John Kiriakou is a former CIA counterterrorism officer and a former senior investigator with
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. John became the sixth whistleblower indicted by the
Obama administration under the Espionage Act -- a law designed to punish spies. He served 23
months in prison as a result of his attempts to oppose the Bush administration's torture
program.
As a top-level State Department official through the administrations of Reagan, Bush I,
Clinton, Bush II and Obama, Burns is implicated in virtually every crime of US imperialism
over the past three decades, including the war in Iraq, the US-NATO attack on Libya, the
military coup that drowned the Egyptian Revolution in blood, and the US intervention in
Syria.
After such a career, as the saying goes, Burns knows where all the bodies are buried. Now
he is assigned to head an agency that is probably responsible for more killing, torture and
mass suffering than any other on the planet: the CIA.
A preview of what to expect from a Burns-led CIA was given during an interview with
National Public Radio's Mary Louise Kelly on "US Global Leadership" held June 19, 2019 at the
Truman Center for National Policy in Washington, DC. In the extended conversation, Burns
defended the US and NATO-led coup in Libya which ended with the grisly murder of Muammar
Gaddafi, followed by an ongoing civil war, the torture and killing of refugees and the return
of slave-markets.
"It was right to act in Libya in the way that we did," Burns said. While the US government
might have "got some assumptions wrong," he expressed no regrets, saying that he still
thought Obama's "decision to act was unavoidable."
Anne , January 12, 2021 at 14:15
I would agree with your estimation some one, anyone who can think, believe, say etc that
what we did in Iraq, Libya (I don't doubt Serbia), Syria is "rightful" has a heinously
distorted mind (pretty much everyone in DC, in the MICIMATT) And Biden has revealed himself
– again – as a subject of the corporate-capitalist-imperialist plutocratic ruling
elites (and one with his hand forever stuck out)
was a member of the British Parliament for nearly 30 years. He presents TV and radio shows
(including on RT). He is a film-maker, writer and a renowned orator. Follow him on Twitter
@georgegalloway
19 Jan,
2021 18:23 It's hard not to wonder if Joe Biden will even last his first 100 days in office...
but those arguing his mind isn't sound enough shouldn't expect a swift exit, because since when
was that a disqualifier?
... ... ...
The madness of Donald Trump had nothing on his Republican predecessor and fellow-impeachee
Richard Nixon. So disturbing were the last days of Tricky Dicky, it came as a relief to America
and the world when he resigned – even though it was famously said his successor Gerald
Ford couldn't chew gum and walk in a straight line at the same time. Bovine he may have been,
but a mad-cow he wasn't.
The Raging Bull Donald J Trump – grotesque, bizarre, unbelievable – had the
misfortune to go quite mad in the age of cable news and social media. His narcissistic
predilections always bordered on personality disorder. But his natural braggadocio stormed him
to victory in 2016 in a backlash against the super-smooth professorial presidency of Barack
Obama, with Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton riding shotgun.
Under Obama, the Clintonite deindustrialisation of America became almost complete .
China was presented with America's lunch. And in no less than nine conflicts across the
globe Obama was 'nation-building' in other people's countries while his own country was falling
apart. But a dark storm was gathering
If only the Democrats had not started out by trying to steal Trump's election in a flurry of
pussy-hats and fake Russiagate hoaxes. If only they hadn't striven might and main to railroad
the Electoral College into betraying their mandate and – in the case of
Nancy Pelosi – make a thinly disguised call for "uprisings throughout the country."
If only they hadn't spent countless millions and two whole years of a four year-term with the
Mueller Inquiry and the cockamaney theorem that the man who confronted Russia from Ukraine and
the Baltics through the wrecked INF and Open Skies treaties to the killing fields of the Levant
was, in fact, an agent of Vladimir Putin. If only, if only
As it happened, the descent into madness of Trump was complete by the end. The coronavirus
he derided at first, before predicting it would disappear in the warm weather of spring, before
pondering whether bleach up the bahookie might not be an option as a cure. The Tammany Hall
skullduggery of election day, practiced over a century in places like New York, rolled out
across the country. The political suicide of only half-making a revolution on January 6 dug
his own grave. Nobody ever beat a candidate who polled over 75 million votes before. But
Sleepy Joe Biden did.
And he did it hardly ever leaving his basement home studio, where he painfully struggled to
read an autocue even with an earpiece shrieking the words to him. When he did speak, it was
often gibberish that would have made Ronald Reagan blush. He oftentimes plainly didn't know
where he was, what office he was running for, which woman was his sister and which was his
wife.
When Boris Yeltsin was rattling down, the world endlessly amused itself at the sight of
Russia on its back, legs akimbo with thieves picking its pocket. With Joe Biden, though, the
political class and its media echo-chamber merely look the other way.
Despite Democratic Party control of all levels of Federal power, it seems unlikely we are
about to witness an FDR or a JFK barnstorming 100 days. It seems fair to wonder if Sleepy
Joe will even see out a hundred days in office. It is, however, certain that if he is in office
he will not be in power. Because power has already passed to the cavernous uncertainty of Vice
President Kamala Harris.
Like this story? Share it with a friend!
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
Mark Conley 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:44 PM
Thanks for reminding the world that the president of the USA including his puppet elected
office bearers has absolutely no power whatsoever. Well said. Thus you have answered your own
observation at the end. The future is indeed dark and uncertain with the only certainty that
nothing good can be expected from any USA government. Thus the onus is on the peaceful
majority to do what is necessary.
Atilla863 42 minutes ago 19 Jan, 2021 03:15 PM
One thing is certain in the new leadership - the debt will go on growing, perhaps reaching
40+ T dollars before the next elections. While this trend continues - the Chinese will be
laughing all the way running to their banks as their economy records fortune after fortune
proportional only inversely to the rate at which America recedes into superpower sunset.
JJ_Rousseau 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:18 PM
I'm surprised at George Galloway's comments, as he is a former MP in British politics. Kamala
in charge? Don't make me laugh. The cabal is in charge, as they have been since Woodrow
Wilson. Before actually, as Garfield was assassinated for shedding light on the banker
machinations. Garfield knew that control of the nation's money was control of the nation. The
coup of America is complete. The POTUS is only the spokesman for the cabal, nothing else
Biden will be much easier to control and manipulate by the Jewish Banking Cartel, which
ultimately controls the US government and Wall Street. Trump was too unpredictable and would
have made it difficult for them to achieve their historical hope. "The Jews energetically
reject the idea of fusion with other nationalities and cling firmly to their historical hope
of World Empire." - Dr. Max Mandelstamm ***We should always listen to the doctors.
Not stolen.....50 states certified, 60 plus courts found nothing fraudulent, and the
electoral votes were confirmed by the House and Senate, with the Senate led by Pence. So, as
the world knows and anyone who knows election laws, the election was one of the most
legitimate ever held in the US.
KarlthePoet 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:10 PM
The Jewish Banking Cartel is ultimately in control of the US government and Wall Street.
They've been in control for decades. Now they've obviously teamed up with the Jewish Big Tech
companies like Facebook and Google in order to gain even more control. Controlling the money,
money system, and the minds of the masses has been their goal. Two Jewish controlled
companies control over $9Trillion of American's wealth. (BlackRock Inc. & Goldman Sachs)
They've finally achieved their goal. The cartel is now in control of a country that is
completely out of control. Karma!
Daffyduck011 KarlthePoet 38 minutes ago 19 Jan, 2021 03:18 PM
Ashkenasty banking cartel.
JJ_Rousseau KarlthePoet 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:29 PM
It's not only the banking cabal, it's the media (which the same gang own, of course). This
cannot happen without a complicit media. This is a very old strategy
Blackace180 7 minutes ago 19 Jan, 2021 03:49 PM
He'll be impeached multiple times, along with his family. Removed and jailed. People need a
reminder of just how messed up Obama/Biden was and it is coming. The caravans are already on
the way and gas has jumped 55 cents a gallon since the election, for no reason other than it
is Biden. People will run the nutcracker right out of office, hopefully before the country
collapses from his nutcracker policies.
White Elk 2 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 01:45 PM
The press-elected.
Xilla White Elk 33 minutes ago 19 Jan, 2021 03:23 PM
How did the press elect him?
Franc 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:28 PM
Xilla/Herrbifi, you're not welcome here. We all know what your goals are, and we all know
you're just here to make a pointless mess.
5th Eye 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:18 PM
An Italian bureaucrat once said, "Everything is changed, so that it remains the same." It
will be exactly like that under Biden to legitimate his regime.
The_Chosenites 51 minutes ago 19 Jan, 2021 03:06 PM
Since both Trump and Biden are proud zionists, the only thing I am certain of is Israel and
the Jewish community have won another election and we'll see many jewish politicians elevated
to positions of power in the Biden administration. Biden best do what's best for Israel if he
knows whats good for him and his health.
KarlthePoet The_Chosenites 16 minutes ago 19 Jan, 2021 03:40 PM
Maybe when Kamala becomes President she can get advice from her Jewish husband, who is a
lawyer. What a coincidence.
Enki14 9 minutes ago 19 Jan, 2021 03:48 PM
That Henry Kissinger, long time shadow government puppet endorsed demented biden is a clue as
to what might happen as they know in 2 years the masses will reinstate conservatives and in 4
years another trumpster. We may see sweeping changes, with some huge blowback.
The_Chosenites Enki14 4 minutes ago 19 Jan, 2021 03:53 PM
Kissinger has had a bed in the oval office for many a President, he must have been installed
by the Chosennites to stay in office forever. Presidents come and go, but Kissinger remains
to pull the strings. Goldman Sach's et al rule the roost.
Daniel Fernald 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:42 PM
Biden's 100 days are interesting. It's exactly 100 days from January 20 to May 1, which is
the communist May Day.
Skeptic076 Daniel Fernald 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:44 PM
Used to be the American May Day as well, you know? Interesting if you research why it is not
anymore.
Michael Knight 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:46 PM
Impossible to believe he'll be in charge????? That's probably because he won't be!
RCBreakenridge Mike Freeman 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:28 PM
Mike, seriously? What echo chamber are you living in? How can you look at Biden and not
understand that he's little more than a life-size cardboard cutout of the man that used to be
Obama's puppet? He'll be in office as long as they can continue to stand him up for photo ops
and he continues to do exactly what he is told. As soon as either of those conditions falter,
Nancy and friends will roll out the 25th amendment, show him the door and lead KH to the
presidents chair. But make no mistake, the only choices Sleepy Joe will be making are to do
as he is told.
I think McConnell is right. Trump speech was very incoherent but it contained some elements
that can be classified as incitement. But I think that he got into trap organized by neoliberal
wing of DemParty. BTW giving a 78-year-old Senator a six-year term is a
modest gamble, as an actuarial table will show you .
Probably McConnell, who is pretty shrewd political operative despite his age, understands
that Trump does not matter anymore. He was spent. Politically on Dec 6, he committed a suicide.
So his impeachment might not as harshly affect the Republican Party as some ZH commenters assume.
The party does need a new leader, anyway. Trump proved to be mediocre politician and this is an
worse then any of his real or imaginable crimes.
" We stood together and said an angry mob would not get veto power over the rule of law in
our nation. Not even for one night. We certified the people's clear choice for their 46th
president.
Tomorrow, President-elect Biden and Vice-President-elect Harris will be sworn in. We will
have a safe and successful inauguration right here on the west front of the Capitol -- the
space that President Bush 41 called 'democracy's front porch.' And then we'll move forward
."
... ... ...
This, according to Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, is a major problem for the GOP who told Fox
News' Ingraham Angle on Friday that he believes that if Senate Minority Leader Mitch
McConnell and other Senate Republicans join the Democrats to impeach President Donald Trump,
a third of Republican voters will permanently abandon the party as a result.
"I don't understand how they can be moving forward with this," he said, before
adding
"The thing they're doing now is an overreaction, and if they think they're going to have
a positive feeling from the public, when they're going to go through a partisan impeachment
again, I think that's absolutely insane and wrong headed ."
Ingraham then asked Paul if he was surprised that McConnell is reportedly planning to
instruct Republicans to vote to convict President Trump after he leaves the presidency, in a
move that could strip him of his security and prevent him from running for office in
2024.
"I don't often get asked my advice from leadership on how they should react, but my
unsolicited suggestion would be this: They will destroy the Republican Party if leadership is
complicit in impeachment, or if leadership votes for impeachment, they will destroy the
party."
"Impeachment is purely a partisan thing, it's for the moral, 'Oh I'm so much better than
you, and you're a bad person, because I'm so moral.'" Paul added, "These are the kind of
people that are going to do this."
"The impeachment is a wrongheaded, partisan notion. If Republicans go along with it, it
will destroy the party. A third of Republicans will leave the party."
"This isn't about, anymore, the electoral college," Paul concluded.
"It's about the future of the party, and if you're going to ostracize and excommunicate
President Trump from the party, then guess what, millions of his fans will leave as
well."
Additionally, congressional leaders, including House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy and Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, will skip President Trump's departure ceremony in Maryland
tomorrow morning in favor of attending mass with incoming President Joe Biden ahead of his
inauguration,
congressional sources familiar with their plans tell Axios .
lay_arrow
Gaius Petronius 31 minutes ago (Edited)
No. If McConnell impeaches Trump, the U.S. becomes an instant one party state. The
entire GOP will collapse and collapse quickly. It would destroy the party. But maybe it's
time for the GOP to die? The Senate has a bunch of RINOs in it. Impeaching Trump will end
their Senate career come their next election. I think if Mitch is doing this, he knows he
is doing this and he knows the consequences and he doesn't give a damn because this is
really *NOT* about Trump, it's about preventing a true outsider (like Trump) from coming in
and running the country when for decades who runs the country has always been decided by
the elite. They don't like the people being able to pick their president. They want to be
the ones who pick the president. The surest way to make sure that Trump never runs again is
to impeach him, but Mitch better get ready to change his party affiliation to D because
there won't be a Republican party after that.
zerofucks 28 minutes ago
the uniparty needs the 2 party cover to keep the illusion going
Gaius Petronius 23 minutes ago remove link
He's just part of the deep state. He likes his power.
Buzz-Kill 6 minutes ago (Edited)
Yep... McConnel is a Deep State operator.
chunga 1 hour ago
People love to throw around this term "rino" which is misleading and dumb. It suggests
there are a handful of them that suck and block the good ones.
If that were the case Moribund Mitch and House Minority leader what's his name would not
be in these "leadership" positions. And they are.
>>Today, the Trump administration filed an appeal against the UK decision not to
extradite Assange. I must imagine that means that Trump has no intention of pardoning
Assange.
Trump was a desperate "Murica must have the biggest dick" imperialist massively triggered
by the US decline and trying to save the US Empire. Like a rabid dog that is wounded, he
attacked anything that moves, including those who helped him get into power.
Anyone who thought that he will help the likes of Russia or Assange does not understand
the psychology of elite US WASPs.
These people thought that they and the US should rule the world and that they are the
cream of the cream. Anything denying them that would lead to crazed reactions, hysteria,
rabid animalistic behavior, and snarling and gnashing of teeth at anything that moves.
Simply put, their decline caused them to go rabid. A rabid dog attacks anything that
moves, whether friendly or not. Unfortunately for the likes of Russia and Assange.
To stop the exacerbation of Trumpism, the talking heads are recommending internet
censorship, regulations on media, new domestic terror laws, literally anything they can
possibly think of except changing the conditions which gave rise to Trumpism.
The most imminent threat to US democracy is not Russia, nor fascist insurrectionists, but
the fact that US democracy is entirely fictional.
Saying US democracy is being threatened is like saying Grinches are a critically endangered
species.
❖
The previous president intervened in the primary to appoint his right-hand man as his chosen
successor. That successor will be installed in a five-day, star-studded celebration surrounded
by a sea of barbed wire and heavily armed soldiers. What "democracy" is under attack,
exactly?
❖
No, the Capitol riot was not "karma" for America's international coups and regime change
interventions. Karma would be the US actually reaping what it sows.
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see
the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack , which will get you an email
notification for everything I publish. My work is
entirely reader-supported , so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around,
liking me on Facebook
, following my antics on Twitter ,
throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon or Paypal , purchasing some of my sweet merchandise ,
buying my new book Poems For
Rebels (you can also download a
PDF for five bucks ) or my old book
Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers . For more info on who I am, where I stand, and
what I'm trying to do with this platform,
click here . Everyone, racist platforms excluded,
has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else
I've written) in any way they like free of charge.
Predictably, conservative publications like Fox Newsdecried the
measures as a power grab by Big Tech and protestations came as far away from Europe, where
German Chancellor, Angela Merkel – whose disdain for Donald Trump has never been a secret
– called the decision to deplatform a head of state " problematic ," an
opinion shared by France's Finance Minister Bruno Le Marie, who warned of a "digital oligarchy"
usurping the powers of the state.
Missing in the salacious back-and-forth conversation between ideological factions and absent
from the argument that they are private corporations, which have the legal authority to ban or
deplatform anybody they wish, is the fact that Twitter, Facebook, and all the other major
social media platforms are organs of the state to begin with, and that nothing they do falls
outside of the ultimate designs of the powers they serve.
Examples abound of how these platforms regularly engage in cyber reconnaissance missions for
American and Atlanticist interests in violation of their own terms of service, such as when
NATO commanders made use of coordinates provided
by Twitter users in order to select missile strike targets in their war against Libya in
2011.
Facebook's recently created oversight
board includes Emi Palmor, who was directly responsible for the removal of thousands of
Palestinian posts from the social media giant during her tenure as Director of Israel's
Ministry of Justice. She, along with other individuals with clear sympathies to American
interests, now sit on an official body tasked with emitting the last word on any disputes
regarding issues of deplatforming on the global social network.
Following you since
1972
In Yasha Levine's seminal
work , "Surveillance Valley," the military origins of the Internet and the close
relationship of social media companies to federal and local law enforcement are made patently
clear. Since their creation, Twitter, Facebook, and other Silicon Valley behemoths have worked
hand in hand with law enforcement agencies to augment their capacity for mass tracking and
surveillance.
From facial recognition technologies to aggregated user post history, these platforms have
been a crucial component in the development of the pervasive surveillance state we now live in.
In the book's prologue, Levine details the attempted creation of a citywide police surveillance
hub in Oakland, California called the "Domain Awareness Center" (DAC), which drew intense
opposition from the local citizenry and privacy advocates who were quick to undress city
officials who were trying to hide the proposed center's insidious links to the NSA, CIA and
military contractors.
Among other capabilities, the control hub would be able to "plug in" social media feeds to
track individuals or groups that posed any kind of threat to the establishment. While the DAC
project was successfully
defeated by an engaged public, similar initiatives were quickly implemented throughout law
enforcement agencies across the country and continue to be perfected in order to not only
track, but infiltrate political groups deemed problematic.
Following the Capitol coup, the North American country's Department of Homeland Security has
hired a private security firm for $1.6m ahead of Joe Biden's inauguration as the 46th President
of the United States, TMZ reports.
Documents obtained by the newspaper revealed that the department awarded a private security
company called Hana Industries Inc. a $1.6 million contract for protective services, effective
now until the very end of the month.
AFP/Getty Images
It was learnt that Hana's protective security officers will be standing watch in the capital
and surrounding areas. The move to hire a private security came directly on the heels of the
failed Capitol coup and the contract was awarded two days after last week's siege.
Hana, which has protected Naval bases and shipyards around Hawaii prior to the new contract,
has been recruiting to get more boots on the ground, especially people with two to five years
of military or law enforcement experience and prior certification from the Department of
Homeland Security.
The need for private security to support the National Guard and police forces in Washington,
came up after the FBI warned that domestic terrorists were planning to take action in
Washington, D.C. and all 50 states between January 16 through Inauguration Day.
The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that the
election night error (detailed above by the vote "flip" from Trump to Biden, was the result
of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona Township tabulator prior to
election night for a down ballot race. We disagree and conclude that the vote flip occurred
because of machine error built into the voting software designed to create error.
Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's statement on November 6, 2020 that "[t]the correct
results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape .. . ." was
false.
The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission
guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This
demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.
The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result of
machine and/or software error, not human error.
The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from
December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events
were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being
sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and
does not meet state or federal election laws.
These errors occurred after The Antrim County Clerk provided a re-provisioned CF card
with uploaded software for the Central Lake Precinct on November 6, 2020. This means the
statement by Secretary Benson was false. The Dominion Voting System produced systemic errors
and high error rates both prior to the update and after the update; meaning the update (or
lack of update) is not the cause of errors.
In Central Lake Township there were 1,222 ballots reversed out of 1,491 total ballots
cast, resulting in an 81.96% rejection rate. All reversed ballots are sent to adjudication
for a decision by election personnel.
It is critical to understand that the Dominion system classifies ballots into two
categories, 1) normal ballots and 2) adjudicated ballots. Ballots sent to adjudication can be
altered by administrators, and adjudication files can be moved between different Results
Tally and Reporting (RTR) terminals with no audit trail of which administrator actually
adjudicates (i.e. votes) the ballot batch. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in
security and election integrity because it provides no meaningful observation of the
adjudication process or audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicated the
ballots.
A staggering number of votes required adjudication. This was a 2020 issue not seen in
previous election cycles still stored on the server. This is caused by intentional errors in
the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no
transparency or audit trail. Our examination of the server logs indicates that this high
error rate was incongruent with patterns from previous years. The statement attributing these
issues to human error is not consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more
correctly to systemic machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally
designed to create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk
adjudication.
Antrim County failed to properly update its system. A purposeful lack of providing basic
computer security updates in the system software and hardware demonstrates incompetence,
gross negligence, bad faith, and/or willful non- compliance in providing the fundamental
system security required by federal and state law. There is no way this election management
system could have passed tests or have been legally certified to conduct the 2020 elections
in Michigan under the current laws. According to the National Conference of State
Legislatures - Michigan requires full compliance with federal standards as determined by a
federally accredited voting system laboratory.
Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years; but all
adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The adjudication process is
the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit
accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist
for previous years using the same software. Removal of these files violates state law and
prevents a meaningful audit, even if the Secretary wanted to conduct an audit. We must
conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.
Likewise, all server security logs prior to 11:03 pm on November 4, 2020 are missing.
This means that all security logs for the day after the election, on election day, and prior
to election day are gone. Security logs are very important to an audit trail, forensics, and
for detecting advanced persistent threats and outside attacks, especially on systems with
outdated system files. These logs would contain domain controls, authentication failures,
error codes, times users logged on and off, network connections to file servers between file
accesses, internet connections, times, and data transfers. Other server logs before November
4, 2020 are present; therefore, there is no reasonable explanation for the security logs to
be missing.
On November 21, 2020, an unauthorized user unsuccessfully attempted to zero out election
results. This demonstrates additional tampering with data.
The Election Event Designer Log shows that Dominion ImageCast Precinct Cards were
programmed with new ballot programming on 10/23/2020 and then again after the election on
11/05/2020. These system changes affect how ballots are read and tabulated, and our
examination demonstrated a significant change in voter results using the two different
programs. In accordance with the Help America Vote Act, this violates the 90-day Safe Harbor
Period which prohibits changes to election systems, registries, hardware/software updates
without undergoing re-certification. According to the National Conference of State
Legislatures - Michigan requires full compliance with federal standards as determined by a
federally accredited voting system laboratory.
The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate evidence of
fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the election. Our findings show
that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals were significantly altered by utilizing
two different program versions (10/23/2020 and 11/05/2020), both of which were software
changes during an election which violates election law, and not just human error associated
with the Dominion Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated
movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State website are
false.
The Dominion ImageCast Precinct (ICP) machines have the ability to be connected to the
internet (see Image 11). By connecting a network scanner to the ethernet port on the ICP
machine and creating Packet Capture logs from the machines we examined show the ability to
connect to the network, Application Programming Interface (API) (a data exchange between two
different systems) calls and web (http) connections to the Election Management System server.
Best practice is to disable the network interface card to avoid connection to the internet.
This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity. Because
certain files have been deleted, we have not yet found origin or destination; but our
research continues.
Because the intentional high error rate generates large numbers of ballots to be
adjudicated by election personnel, we must deduce that bulk adjudication occurred. However,
because files and adjudication logs are missing, we have not yet determined where the bulk
adjudication occurred or who was responsible for it. Our research continues.
Research is ongoing. However, based on the preliminary results, we conclude that the
errors are so significant that they call into question the integrity and legitimacy of the
results in the Antrim County 2020 election to the point that the results are not certifiable.
Because the same machines and software are used in 48 other counties in Michigan, this casts
doubt on the integrity of the entire election in the state of Michigan.
The U.S. seems to have gone completely crazy these day.
Mutazione dello Stato.
We were born and raised in the 20th Century or the 21st Century, so we're accustomed with
the idea that deep changes in society can only happen through revolutions. That's not true:
Marx delineated in which conditions change happens through revolution, but he never stated
all societal changes are revolutions.
A society can change positively or negatively. Positively when it is in an ascendant phase
of its mode of production. Negatively when it is in a declining phase of its mode of
production (every mode of production has an entropy, so this is always the case).
When it is changing negatively, it can do so mainly in two ways: sectarianism (decay
through division and fragmentation) and/or withering (decay through shrinking of economic
base and the rise of better systems).
In my opinion the USA is decaying through sectarianism.
We can observe today collapsed by sectarianism in the Middle East (Shia vs. Sunni;
destruction of Iraq; destruction of Libya etc. etc.).
A famous example of collapse by withering is Ancient Sparta, which refused to reform and
successfully crushed all the revolution attempts that rose against it. But in the end its own
system reached its logical conclusion and, by the time the Roman Legions arrived to conquer
it, it already was an insignificant village.
So, yes: even societies that successfully crush the revolution attempts against it are
condemned to change and eventually disappear. Conservatives from all around the globe should
not feed themselves the illusion they can live in their little worlds forever.
The American empire is massive and cannot really be compared with Sparta. It is entirely
reasonable to assume that its demise involves both withering and fragmentation. That said I
had previously assumed that the empire's vassal states would fragment away while the core
withered, but given how unhinged America and its leadership have become we could see the
cracks in the USA become chasms surprisingly soon. The empire's vassal states could be left
orbiting around a debris field.
"Everything has an end, so do empires, both the United States and the Soviet Union.
Washington has outrageously favoured a small camarilla of ultra-billionaires. Now it has to
face its old demons, prepare for secession and civil war..."
"...Part of the power has already tipped democratic institutions into the hands of a few
ultra-billionaires. The United States that we knew no longer exists. Their agony has
begun." https://www.voltairenet.org/article211982.html
The stuff about the NY consulate really sets me off, Sputnik said the phones are down for
two days running and internet intermittent.
It's hard to guess at the reason for any of it since it could be almost anything (and
pretty much entirely stupid no matter what) but what's much more noticeable is the apparent
lack of interest in truly clarifying what the hell the point is/was supposed to be (instead
of bs) from anyone inside anywhere in the US government structures, or intelligence services,
or armed forces.
Dystopian and dysfunctional become synonyms at some point.
Other than that I'm only waiting to see if anything within the Pentagon will get a move on
to clear up all the mess (rather than "worrying" about National Guards who will do whatever
they're told). If anything happens I expect it to be clean and orderly and then after the
fact maybe the NG troops will be told something or the other a little before everyone else,
and that's about it. They don't have any need to know about anything in advance or as it
happens.
That's just me, at least a little bit more realistic in my "if-so" than the FBI and Pelosi
gang? :)
"... "A month after the election, Biden's nominations make clear that the president-elect is most focused on trying to fulfill his ..."
"... to donors that nothing fundamentally changes. And yet, that tacit admission may have stunned those who keep hearing from liberal and progressive groups in Washington that, in fact, the left has been notching monumental victories in Biden's cabinet appointments ..."
"... What little organized left political infrastructure exists in Washington is largely valorizing or publicly defending swamp creatures who at minimum deserve a loyal opposition. The ..."
"... being done by a small handful of under-resourced groups to mount a real opposition is getting trampled by a culture of obsequiousness. This culture of acquiescence gives swamp creatures a free pass ..."
"... Despite Tanden's ..."
"... push for Social Security cuts ..."
"... , Beltway liberal groups whose mission is to defend Social Security ..."
"... . Despite Tanden having her organization ..."
"... rake in cash ..."
"... from Wall Street, Amazon, billionaires and ( ..."
"... ) foreign governments, a Ralph Nader-founded, all-purpose consumer advocacy group ..."
"... CAP as "one of our key partners in the fight to tax corporations and the rich, rein in monopoly power, tackle government corruption, and much more." Despite Tanden ..."
"... a union at CAP, ..."
"... union leaders ..."
"... in Washington lauded her. ..."
"... American Prospect ..."
"... "a President Biden would be in the business of confronting Mr. Putin for his aggressions, not embracing him. Not trashing NATO, but strengthening its deterrence, investing in new capabilities to deal with challenges in cyberspace, in outer space, under the sea, A.I., electronic warfare, and give robust security assistance to countries like Ukraine, Georgia, the Western Balkans ..."
"... "a President Putin would be in the business of confronting Mr. Biden for his aggressions (in Syria, or elsewhere), not embracing them. Not trashing the Warsaw Pact, but strengthening its deterrence, investing in new capabilities to deal with challenges in cyberspace, in outer space, under the sea, A.I., electronic warfare, and give robust security assistance to countries like Canada, Mexico, and other nations that are near the U.S. ..."
"... Washington Post ..."
"... Bernard Schwartz, ..."
"... a former Vice Chairman and top investor in Lockheed Martin ..."
"... (which is by far the largest seller to the U.S. Government, and also the largest seller to most of America's allied Governments), is one of Joe Biden's top donors. CNN headlined, on October 24th, ..."
"... "Biden allies intensify push for super PAC after lackluster fundraising quarter" ..."
"... , and reported that, "Bernard Schwartz, a private investor and donor to the former vice president's campaign, said he spoke with Biden within the last two weeks and encouraged him to do just that." It's not for nothing that throughout Biden's long Senate career, he has voted in favor of every U.S. invasion that has been placed before the U.S. Senate. ..."
That didn't take long. He's not even in office, and he has already surrounded himself, as
the incoming President, with individuals who derive their wealth from (and will be serving)
America's top defense contractors and Wall Street. The likelihood that these Government
officials will be biting the hands that feed them is approximately zero. Great investigative
journalists have already exposed how corrupt they are. For that to be the case so early (even
before taking office) is remarkable, and only a summary of those reports will be provided here,
with links to them, all of which reports are themselves linking to the incriminating evidence,
so that everything can easily be tracked back to the documentation by the reader here, even
before there are any 'Special Prosecutors' (as if those were serving anyone other than the
opposite Party's political campaigns, and, ultimately, the opposite Party's billionaires).
First up, is the independent investigative team of David Sirota and Andrew Perez. On
December 4th, they bannered "The Beltway
Left Is Normalizing Corruption And Corporatism" , and reported that "A month after the
election, Biden's nominations make clear that the president-elect is most focused on trying to
fulfill hispromiseto donors that nothing fundamentally changes. And yet, that tacit
admission may have stunned those who keep hearing from liberal and progressive groups in
Washington that, in fact, the left has been notching monumental victories in Biden's cabinet
appointments ."
Liberal (that's to say Democratic Party) U.S. media hide the corruptness of Democratic
politicians, and conservative (that's to say Republican Party) U.S. media hide the corruptness
of Republican politicians; and, so, the public today are getting corrupt leaders whichever side
they vote for. No mainstream 'news' media report what independent investigative journalists
such as Sirota and Perez report. Authentically good journalists use as sources -- and link to
in their articles -- neither Democratic nor Republican allegations, but instead are on the
margins, outside of the major media, and so rely on whistleblowers and other trustworthy
outsiders, not on people who are somebody's paid PR flacks, individuals who are being paid to
deceive. As Sirota and Perez state: " What little organized left political infrastructure
exists in Washington is largely valorizing or publicly defending swamp creatures who at minimum
deserve a loyal opposition. Thegood workbeing done by a small handful of under-resourced groups to mount a real opposition is
getting trampled by a culture of obsequiousness. This culture of acquiescence gives swamp
creatures a free pass ." It's all some sort of mega-corporate propaganda -- 100%
billionaire-supported on the conservative side, 100% billionaire-supported also on the liberal
side, and 0% billionaire-supported for anything that is authentically progressive (not
dependent, at all, upon the aristocracy).
That independent reporting team focused on Biden's having chosen an economic team which will
start his Administration already offering to congressional Republicans an initial Democratic
Party negotiating position that accepts Republicans' basic proposals to cut middle class Social
Security and health care benefits in order for the Government to be able to continue expanding
the military budgets and purchases from the billionaire-controlled firms, such as Northrop
Grumman -- firms whose entire sales (or close to it) are to the U.S. Government and to the
governments (U.S. 'allies') that constitute these firms' secondary markets. (In other words:
those budget-cuts aren't going to be an issue between the two Parties and used by Biden's team
as a bargaining chip to moderate the Republicans' position that favors more for 'defense' and
less for the poor, but are actually accepted by both Parties, even before the new
Administration will take office.) Obviously, anything that both sides to a negotiation accept
at the very start of a negotiation will be included in the final product from that negotiation;
and this means that during a Biden Presidency there will be reductions in middle-class Social
security and health care benefits in order to continue, at the present level -- if not to
increase yet further -- Government spending on the products and services of such firms as
Lockheed Martin and the Rand Corporation (firms that control their market by controlling their
Government, which is their main or entire market).
Sirota and Perez focus especially upon one example: Neera Tanden, whom Biden chose on
November 30th to be the White House Budget Director, and who therefore will set the priorities
which determine how much federal money the President will be trying to get the Congress to
allocate to what recipients:
Despite Tanden'spush for Social Security cuts, Beltway liberal groups whose mission is to
defend Social Securitylauded
herthink
tank. Despite Tanden having her organizationrake in
cashfrom Wall Street, Amazon, billionaires and (previously) foreign governments, a Ralph Nader-founded, all-purpose consumer
advocacy group
praisedCAP as "one of our key partners in the fight to tax corporations and the
rich, rein in monopoly power, tackle government corruption, and much more." Despite Tandenbustinga union at CAP,twonationalunion
leadersin Washington lauded her.
Next up: One of the rare honest non-profits in the field of journalism is the Project on
Government Oversight, POGO, which refuses to accept donations from "anyone who stands to
benefit financially from our work," and which states in its unique "Donation Acceptance Policy" that,
"POGO reviews all contributions exceeding $100 in order to maintain this standard." In other
words: they refuse to be corrupt. Virtually all public-policy or think-tank nonprofits are
profoundly corrupt, but POGO is the most determined exception to that general
rule.
On 20 November 2020, POGO headlined "Should
Michèle Flournoy Be Secretary of Defense?" and their terrific investigative team of
Winslow Wheeler and Pierre Sprey delivered a scorching portrayal of Flournoy as irredeemably
corrupt -- it ought to be read by everybody. It's essential reading throughout, and its links
to the evidence are to the very best sources. So, I won't summarize it, because all Americans
need to know what it reports, and to be able to verify, on their own (by clicking onto any link
in it that interests them), any allegation that the given reader has any question about.
However, I shall point out here the sheer hypocrisy of the following which that article quotes
Flournoy as asserting: "It will be imperative for the next secretary to appoint a team of
senior officials who meet the following criteria: deep expertise and competence in their areas
of responsibility; proven leadership in empowering teams, listening to diverse views, making
tough decisions, and delivering results." (Of course, that assertion presumes the
given 'expert' to be not only authentically expert but also honest and trustworthy,
authentically representing the public's interest and no special interests whatsoever -- not at
all corrupt -- which is certainly a false allegation in her own case.) She had urged the 2003
invasion of Iraq, and had participated in planning and overseeing both the war against Syria,
and the coup that destroyed Ukraine (and none of those countries had ever invaded, or even
threatened to invade, the United States); and, so, for her to brag about her
"delivering results" is not merely hypocritical, it is downright evil, because she is obviously
proud, there, of her vicious, outright voracious, record.
Her business-partner, Tony Blinken, has already received Biden's approval to become his
Secretary of State, and the first really good investigative journalist that American
Prospect magazine has had, Jonathan Guyer, headlined on November 23rd, "What You Need to Know About Tony Blinken" , and what Guyer
reports is just what any well informed reader would expect to see for a business
partner of Flournoy's.
Guyer's report closes by making passing reference to a CBS 'news' puff-piece for Blinken. In
that CBS
puff-piece , Blinken says, "a President Biden would be in the business of confronting
Mr. Putin for his aggressions, not embracing him. Not trashing NATO, but strengthening its
deterrence, investing in new capabilities to deal with challenges in cyberspace, in outer
space, under the sea, A.I., electronic warfare, and give robust security assistance to
countries like Ukraine, Georgia, the Western Balkans ." What would Americans think if
Russia were to have retained its Warsaw Pact, and "a President Putin would be in the
business of confronting Mr. Biden for his aggressions (in Syria, or elsewhere), not embracing
them. Not trashing the Warsaw Pact, but strengthening its deterrence, investing in new
capabilities to deal with challenges in cyberspace, in outer space, under the sea, A.I.,
electronic warfare, and give robust security assistance to countries like Canada, Mexico, and
other nations that are near the U.S. "? Guyer pointedly noted that "The [CBS News] podcast
was sponsored by a major weapons maker. 'At Lockheed Martin, your mission is ours,' read an
announcer." Tony Blinken's mission is theirs. These people get the money both coming and going
-- on both sides of the "revolving door." Today's American Government is for sale to
the highest bidders, on any policy, domestic or foreign. 'Government service' is just a
sabbatical to boost their value to the firms that will be paying them the vast majority of
their lifetime 'earnings'. This is the reality that mainstream U.S.-and-allied 'news' media
refuse to publish (or, especially , to make clear). Only an electorate which
is ignorant of this reality can accept such a government.
Back on 26 January 2020, I had headlined "Joe Biden Is as Corrupt as They
Come" and documented the reality of this, but America's mainstream media were hiding that
fact so as to decrease the likelihood that the only Democratic Party Presidential candidate whom no billionaire
supported , Bernie Sanders, might win the nomination. Perhaps now that it's too late, even
those 'news' organizations (such as CNN, Fox, CBS, NBC, ABC, New York Times ,
Washington Post , PBS, and NPR) will start reporting the fact of Biden's corruptness.
Where billionaires control all of the mainstream media, there is no democracy -- it's not even
possible , in such a country
Bernard Schwartz,a former Vice Chairman and top investor in Lockheed Martin(which is by far
the largest seller to the U.S. Government, and also the largest seller to most of America's
allied Governments), is one of Joe Biden's top donors. CNN headlined, on October 24th,"Biden
allies intensify push for super PAC after lackluster fundraising quarter", and
reported that, "Bernard Schwartz, a private investor and donor to the former vice president's
campaign, said he spoke with Biden within the last two weeks and encouraged him to do just
that." It's not for nothing that throughout Biden's long Senate career, he has voted in favor
of every U.S. invasion that has been placed before the U.S. Senate.
Near the end of the Democratic Party's primaries, on 16 March 2020, CNBC headlined
"Megadonors pull plug on plan for anti-Sanders super PAC as Biden racks up wins" , and
reported that Bernard Schwartz had become persuaded by other billionaires that, by this time,
"Biden could handle Sanders on his own." They had done their job; they would therefore control
the U.S. Government regardless of which Party's nominee would head it.
Biden -- like Trump, and like Obama and Bush and Clinton before him -- doesn't represent the
American people. He represents his mega-donors. And he is staffing his Administration
accordingly. He repays favors: he delivers the services that they buy from him. This is today's
America. And that is the way it functions.
46 Follow RT on Outgoing US
President Donald Trump has delivered his "parting gift" to the Moscow-led Nord Stream 2 gas
pipeline, with newly announced sanctions targeting a pipe-laying vessel and companies involved
in the multinational project.
The specialist ship concerned, named, 'Fortuna,' and oil tanker 'Maksim Gorky', as well as
two Russian firms, KVT-Rus and Rustanker, were blacklisted on Tuesday under CAATSA (Countering
America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act) as part of Washington's economic war on Moscow.
The same legislation had been previously used by the US to target numerous Russian officials
and enterprises.
Russian energy giant Gazprom warned its investors earlier on Tuesday that Nord Stream 2
could be suspended or even canceled if more US restrictions are introduced.
However, Moscow has assured its partners that it intends to complete the project despite
"harsh pressure on the part of Washington," according to Kremlin press secretary Dmitry
Peskov. Reacting to the new package of sanctions on Tuesday, Peskov called them
"unlawful."
Meanwhile, the EU said it is in no rush to join the Washington-led sanction war on Nord
Stream 2. EU foreign affairs chief, Josep Borrell, said that the bloc is not going to resist
the construction of the project.
"Because we're talking about a private project, we can't hamper the operations of those
companies if the German government agrees to it," Borrell said Tuesday.
Nord Stream 2 is an offshore gas pipeline, linking Russia and Germany with aim of providing
cheaper energy to Central European customers. Under the agreement between Moscow and Berlin, it
was to be launched in mid-2020, but the construction has been delayed due to strong opposition
from Washington.
The US, which is hoping to sell its Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) to Europe, has hit the
project with several rounds of sanctions over scarcely credible claims that it could undermine
European energy security. Critics say the real intent is to force EU members to buy from
American companies.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
46 Follow RT on
Trends:
Fatback33 4 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 11:20 AM
The group that owns Washington makes the foreign policy. That policy is not for the benefit
of the people.
DukeLeo Fatback33 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:06 PM
That is correct. The private banks and corporations in the US are very upset about Nord
Stream - 2, as they want Europe to buy US gas at double price. Washington thus introduces
additional political gangsterism in the shape of new unilateral sanctions which have no merit
in international law.
noremedy 4 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 11:22 AM
Is the U.S. so stupid that they do not realize that they are isolating themselves? Russia has
developed SPFS, China CIPS, together with Iran, China and Russia are further developing a
payment transfer system. Once in place and functioning this system will replace the western
SWIFT system for international payment transfers. It will be the death knell for the US
dollar. 327 million Americans are no match for the rest of the billions of the world's
population. The next decade will see the total debasement of the US monetary system and the
fall from power of the decaying and crumbling in every way U.S.A.
Hanonymouse noremedy 2 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 01:37 PM
They don't care. They have the most advanced military in the world. Might makes right, even
today.
Shelbouy 3 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 12:25 PM
Russia currently supplies over 50% of the natural gas consumed by The EU. Germany and Italy
are the largest importers of Russian natural gas. What is the issue of sanctions stemming
from and why are the Americans doing this? A no brainer question I suppose. It's to make more
money than the other supplier, and exert political pressure and demand obedience from its
lackey. Germany.
David R. Evans Shelbouy 2 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 01:58 PM
Russia and Iran challenge perpetual US wars for Israel's Oded Yinon Plan. Washington is
Israel-controlled territory.
Jewel Gyn 4 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 11:34 AM
Sanctions work both ways. With the outgoing Trump administration desperately laying mines for
Biden, we await how sleepy Joe is going to mend strayed ties with EU.
Count_Cash 4 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 11:20 AM
The US mafia state continues with the same practices. The dog is barking but the caravan is
going. The counter productiveness of sanctions always shows through in the end! I am sure
with active efforts of Germany and Russia against US mafia oppression that a blowback will be
felt by the US over time!
Dachaguy 4 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 11:24 AM
This is an act of war against Germany. NATO should respond and act against the aggressor,
America.
xyz47 Dachaguy 42 minutes ago 19 Jan, 2021 03:20 PM
NATO is run by the US...
lovethy Dachaguy 2 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 01:04 PM
NATO has no separate existence. It's the USA's arm of aggression, suppression and domination.
Germany after WWII is an occupied country of USA. Thousand of armed personnel stationed in
Germany enforcing that occupation.
Chaz Dadkhah 3 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 12:19 PM
Further proof that Trump is no friend of Russia and is in a rush to punish them while he
still has power. If it was the swamp telling him to do that, like his supporters suggest,
then they would have waited till their man Biden came in to power in less than 24 hours to do
it. Wake up!
Mac Kio 3 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 12:34 PM
USA hates fair competition. USA ignores all WTO rules.
Russkiy09 2 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 01:33 PM
By whining and not completing in the face of US, Russia is losing credibility. They should
not have delayed to mobilize the pipe laying vessel and other equipment for one whole year.
They should have mobilized in three months and finished by now. Same happens when Jewtin does
not shoot down Zio air force bombing Syria everyday. But best option should have been to tell
European vassals that "if you can, take our gas. But we will charge the highest amount and
sell as much as we want, exclude Russophobic Baltic countries and Poland and neo-vassal
Ukraine. Pay us not in your ponzi paper money but real goods and services or precious metals
or other commodities or our own currency Ruble." I so wish I could be the President of
Russia. Russians deserve to be as wealthy as the Swiss or SIngapore etc., not what they are
getting. Their leaders should stand up for their interest. And stop empowering the greedy
merchantalist Chinese and brotherhood Erdogan.
BlackIntel 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:27 PM
America i captured by private interest; this project threatens American private companies
hence the government is forced to protect capitalism. This is illegal
Ohhho 3 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 12:15 PM
That project was a mistake from the start: Russia should distance itself from the Evil
empire, EU included! Stop wasting time and resources on trying to please the haters and
keeping them more competitive with cheaper Russian natural gas: focus on real partners and
potential allies elsewhere!
butterfly123 2 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 01:58 PM
I have said it before that part of the problem is at the door of the policy-makers and
politicians in Russia. Pipeline project didn't spring up in the minds of politicians in
Russia one morning, presumably. There should have been foresight, detailed planning, and
opportunity creation for firms in Russia to acquire the skill-set and resources to advance
this project. Not doing so has come to bite Russia hard and painful. Lessons learnt I hope Mr
President!
jakro 4 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 11:37 AM
Good news. The swamp is getting deeper and bigger.
hermaflorissen 4 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 11:49 AM
Trump finally severed my expectations for the past 4 years. He should indeed perish.
ariadnatheo 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 03:06 PM
That is one Trump measure that will not be overturned by the Senile One. They will need to
amplify the RussiaRussiaRussia barking and scratching to divert attention from their dealings
with China
Neville52 2 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:01 PM
Its time the other nations of the world turned their backs on the US. Its too risky if you
are an international corporation to suddenly have large portions of your income cancelled due
to some crazy politician in the US
5th Eye 2 hours ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:03 PM
From empire to the collapse of empire, US follows UK to the letters. Soon it will be
irrelevant. The only thing that remains for UK is the language. Probably hotdog for the US.
VonnDuff1 1 hour ago 19 Jan, 2021 02:10 PM
The USA Congress and its corrupt foreign policy dictates work to the detriment of Europe and
Russia, while providing no tangible benefits to US states or citizens. So globalist demands
wrapped in the stars & stripes, should be laughed at, by all freedom loving nations.
There's an Attorney in Washington State who used to be a Security Cop at the Capitol. He
said he has NEVER seen anything like this. When he was in Security at the Capitol he said
they would Always plan for Protests and set Perimeters up where nobody could get through. He
also mentioned how everyone knew about this Protest for weeks. (
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2021/jan/09/spokane-attorney-and-former-capitol-police-officer/
)
It was a trap. I really don't know about Trump. Is he that dumb he didn't see this coming?
And who is responsible for setting up the Perimeters? Nancy? Mitch?
So, this was a False Flag, just like Saker says. It was an event coldly calculated and
planned to ensure a result that could be blamed on the "enemy".
And it worked.
Yes, I voted Trump twice. I am not ashamed of it. I'm not a fan of Trump, but am a Proud
Pleb/Peasant/Deplorable who is sick of the Self-Appointed Triad (Political
Administrators/Technocrats/Media Moguls).
Well put article, thank you. Personally, I suspect that for once the bumbling incompetent
Democrats out-faked the vote better than the Republicans, for whom sabotaging the will of the
people is historically Job No. 1. Maybe seventeen million fake Biden votes trounced ten
million phony Trump votes delivered by the ever-reliable electronic voting machines, and
there you go. Like the man said, if voting could make a difference, it would not be
legal.
Trump is a larger than life figure you must either love or loathe. I was impressed by his
inaugural address but skeptical of his intent and his ability to deliver. Yes, it is true the
one great thing he has done is to wake millions of Americans to the reality that an unelected
government makes all the important policy decisions with no concern for the consent of the
governed. And this is a real game changer.
It is sickening to watch the demonization of our fellow Americans in high gear this week.
The CIA's media assets are certainly earning their thirty pieces of silver. The media shows
us images of the "rioters" who terrified their owners, and assumes we will obediently get
scared of them too. No, fellas, not this time.
This system cannot be reformed from within. Its corruption is the logical result of
keeping an obsolete form of government to run a 21st century post-capitalist global empire.
It was devised by eighteenth century aristocrats primarily not to interfere with their local
class privilege in a tiny agrarian country. We are again at a point in our history where the
contradictions are too great to sustain. We will either become all of one thing, or all of
the other, but we cannot continue to pretend that Washington as it is has anything to do with
liberty. In my youth, I thought a socialist revolution would do the job, but since there is
zero support for such a thing among a thoroughly indoctrinated population, we'll have to work
with what we've got. Our survival, and the world's, is at stake.
"... After winning the 2016 election Trump caved early and caved often and governed like a neocon, while Sanders let himself get cucked by the DNC in 2016 and folded like a cheap suit during his 2020 campaign. ..."
"... So both of these clowns proved they are no threat to the establishment but it's in the establishment's interest to portray them as dangerous interlopers who threaten the stability of the nation. Why? Because it keeps the "rebellion" in house. As long as the electorate believes a Democrat or Republican POTUS can address their grievances the establishment can sigh in relief knowing that they are still in control. ..."
...Fact is, Trump was never the savior you wanted him to be. Had president Trump respected
candidate Trump's promises he'd at least be a man of his word. But he didn't do that of
course. Trump is a rhetorician (or a windbag, take your pick) and if you focus intently on
his words only while downplaying his actions, you might be able to convince yourself into
believing he is more than a prolific bullshitter.
Fox News is the "conservative" MSNBC. It swings from the GOP's nutsack (as you have
apparently just discovered) and in fact pioneered that style of outrage "journalism." The
American elite need to keep people believing in the two-party duopoly. Fox plays its roll by
keeping its viewers in the Republican fold. Hate the Democrats? Vote GOP! is the message. If
you think MSNBC is trash, why would you cut Fox News any slack? They perform the same
function.
Here's a conspiracy theory for you. What if Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are both
controlled opposition? Start with their affiliation. The supposedly "independent" Sanders is
effectively a Democrat and the supposedly "insurgent" Trump is effectively a Republican. The
media has been in TDS mode for four years and when it looked like Sanders might have some
bipartisan appeal he was quickly slapped down by liberal pundits and commentators.
But what if all that outage is mostly theater designed to get voters believing that
Trump/Sanders are antiestablishment insurgents who present a "real difference" from stale
Democrat/Republican politics? The outrage and slap downs gives the impression that the
establishment really really hates these guys and lets the people who support them think that
they are supporting principled antiestablishmentarians.
The establishment may not like Trump or Sanders very much but as long as they are
controllable they are preferable to a strong third party candidate or a mass revolt against
the duopoly. After winning the 2016 election Trump caved early and caved often and
governed like a neocon, while Sanders let himself get cucked by the DNC in 2016 and folded
like a cheap suit during his 2020 campaign.
So both of these clowns proved they are no threat to the establishment but it's in the
establishment's interest to portray them as dangerous interlopers who threaten the stability
of the nation. Why? Because it keeps the "rebellion" in house. As long as the electorate
believes a Democrat or Republican POTUS can address their grievances the establishment can
sigh in relief knowing that they are still in control.
I don't know if Trump and Sanders are deliberately controlled opposition. But as a theory
it's more plausible than The Saker's undying trust in Trump as a principled POTUS who was
derailed by crafty internal and liberal opposition. If only Trump had been left alone to
govern without undue interference he would be a real hero and America would be saved. Give me
a break, The Saker, you can't have it both ways. Either the Empire and everything it stands
for is rotten, in which case supporting anyone running on a GOP/Democrat ticket is a fool's
errand, or it's not, in which case you can trust the system, roll up your blog and find a new
hobby.
What The Saker and other commentators that serve up predictable and unchallenging opinions
tailored for a specific audience do is provide entertainment. It's stuff for the faithful to
read and collectively reaffirm their beliefs while tsk-tsking at all the fools who "just
don't get it." Occasionally they provide comedic interludes like this piece where The Saker
discovers that Fox News is actually a corporate outlet that supports an established political
party and promotes the sanctity of the American duopoly. lol Thanks for the midweek chuckle,
my dude.
The United States is also a one-party state but, with typical American extravagence,
they have two of them.
– Julius Nyerere (former socialist president of Tanzania)
Biden is clearly an enforcer for a faction of what we might call the permanent
establishment, the hidden real government that runs on automatic imperial pilot regardless
who is nominal US President.
That "permanent establishment" is currently becoming "dis-established" everywhere in the
world. It sees with horror that its grip on the entire world is crumbling.
It does only what it has always tried in such cases -- war, war, war. Only of late, those
wars -- war against Russia over Ukraine, war against Assad's Syria, an attempted war against
Erdogan in Turkey, a war against the growing economic muscle in the world of China -- have
been impotent flops.
Biden, a dutiful servant of those interests, carries the flag of war to where he is sent,
much like the character in Monty Python's Ministry of Silly Walks.
So Far, More Than 120 Arrests (more coming) for Siege on Capitol
The FBI has over 110,000 pictures and videos that they are sifting through, to identify
domestic terrorists that laid siege to the Capitol on Jan 6. If you're in one of those pics
or videos, it sux to be you. Expect a knock (or no-knock) at your door, from the FBI, any day
now.
Doesn't seem to me there is any direct connection of that reporter to CNN. She's a
freelance reporter (so technically not employed by them). From her website, she has done work
for the following: NBC, NPR, Huffington Post, Buzzfeed News and others.
The video is still suspicious. But now that everyone jumped on the "CNN reporter"
bandwagon without checking first, now the whole situation can be labelled "fake news" because
of that error.
Below is my column in USA Today on the upcoming Senate trial of President Donald Trump. The
Hill recently ran my second
column on why the best defense of Trump could be no defense -- to skip the Senate trial and
force a threshold vote on the constitutionality of the trial of an ex-president. Here is my
column:
With the second impeachment of President Donald Trump, the Congress is set for one of the
most bizarre moments in constitutional history: the removal of someone who has already left
office. The retroactive removal would be a testament to the timeliness of rage. While it is not
without precedent, it is without logic.
The planned impeachment trial of Donald Trump after he leaves office would be our own
version of the Cadaver Synod . In 897,
Pope Stephen VI and his supporters continued to seethe over the action of Pope Formosus, who
not only died in 896 but was followed by another pope, Boniface VI. After the brief rule of
Boniface VI, Pope Stephen set about to even some scores. He pulled Formosus out of his tomb,
propped him up in court, and convicted him of variety of violations of canon law. Formosus was
then taken out, three fingers cut off, and eventually thrown in the Tiber River.
While some may be looking longingly at the Potomac for their own Cadaver Synod, Speaker
Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats have stated that their primary interest is in the possible
disqualification of Trump from holding future federal office. Disqualification however is an
optional penalty that follows a conviction and removal. It may be added to the primary purpose
of removal referenced in the Constitution. The Trump trial would convert this supplemental
punishment into the primary purpose of the trial.
This did happen before but that precedent is only slightly better than the Cadaver Synod.
That case involved William Belknap who served as Secretary of War to President Ulysses S.
Grant. Belknap resigned after allegations of corruption -- just shortly before a House vote of
impeachment. The Senate held a trial but acquitted him. Twenty nine of 66 voting senators
disagreed in a threshold motion that Belknap was "amenable to trial by impeachment . . .
notwithstanding his resignation."
In fairness to the Democrats, I have long rejected the argument that there comes a point
when it is too late to impeach a president while he is in office. As I said in both the Clinton
and Trump impeachment hearings, the House is under a duty to impeach if it believes that a
president has committed a high crime and misdemeanor. If that occurred on the last day of a
term, it would still be warranted.
My objection to this second impeachment was that it proceeded without any deliberation of
the traditional impeachment process. It was a snap impeachment, which is to the Constitution
what Snapchat is to conversations. It reduces the process to a raw, brief and partisan vote.
This could have been avoided. A hearing could have been held in a day to allow the language of
the article to be amended and the implications of the impeachment considered. It would also
have allowed for a formal demand for a response from the president.
Instead, the impeachment was pushed through on a partisan muscle vote with only ten
Republicans supporting the single article. It was an ironic moment. In the last Trump
impeachment, I chastised the Democrats for pushing through an impeachment on the slimmest
record and the shortest time frame of any presidential impeachment. They insisted that there
was no time for witnesses before the House Judiciary hearing, but later waited weeks to submit
the articles to the Senate. Now they have outdone that record with an impeachment with no
traditional record in a matter of a couple of days. The Senate will not sit
until January 19th and any trial would likely occur after January 20th.
I have long wrestled with the notion of a retroactive impeachment trial. I can see the value
of establishing that a president was not just accused but convicted of unconstitutional acts.
There is also the value of disqualification of such an individual from future office. However,
what was an intriguing academic puzzle is now a pressing constitutional concern.
The impeachment trial of a private citizen raises a host of constitutional and practical
problems . For example, a president can rely on publicly-funded lawyers like the White House
Counsel and can assert presidential privileges. After leaving office, an ex-president would not
only pay for his own defense, but he will lose the ability to make privilege determinations.
Indeed, many such assertions would be subject to the review of his successor, Joe Biden. It
would be like Pope Stephen making determinations on critical evidence of Pope Formosus after
pulling him out of the crypt.
The main issue however would be whether this is really an impeachment trial, as opposed to
some curious constitutional post-mortem on a passed presidency. That question could face
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts if he has summoned for this role. A chief justice does
not simply show up at anything deemed an impeachment trial. He must make an independent
judgment over his carrying out a constitutional function. Even if he rules that this is a valid
trial, that ruling could be rejected by the Senate in a motion to dismiss the article. In the
Clinton impeachment, Democrats demanded such a threshold vote before a trial. Of course, since
there is no president to try for impeachment, the Senate may not even ask Roberts to preside --
a telling departure that only undermines the trial as a whole.
This impeachment should end with the Trump administration. I do not fault those who view the
president's conduct as impeachable. The speech was reckless and wrong. My primary objection was
to the use of a snap impeachment and the language of the article of impeachment. That is now
part of Trump's presidential legacy. The question is now what will be the troubling
constitutional legacy left by the Senate in the trial of an ex-president.
In my view, a retroactive removal vote would combine with the use of a snap impeachment to
fundamentally altering the role of impeachment in the United States. It would take a rush to
judgment and turn it into a parade of constitutional horribles. Any party could retroactively
impeach or remove a former president for the purpose of disqualifying him from office. Thus, if
a party feared a one-term president's possible run, they could hold use impeachment to
eliminate the political threat. With the snap impeachment, it would be worse than creating a
type of "no confidence vote" under our Constitution. After a non confidence vote in the United
Kingdom, a former prime minister can still run again for office.
A conviction would also not bring the closure as many may hope. Such disqualification would
be one of the few impeachment issues that could be challenged in court. Trump would have
standing to sue for his right to run again and he could well win. He would then be more popular
than ever with many citizens eager to defy the Washington establishment. There is another path.
The Senate could end the trial with a threshold vote and let history and the voters be the
final judge of Donald J. Trump.
Below is a list of which House Republicans voted to impeach Trump on Wednesday.
Rep. John Katko
(N.Y.) : "To allow the President of the United States to incite this attack without
consequence is a direct threat to the future of our democracy. For that reason, I cannot
sit by without taking action. I will vote to impeach this President."
Rep. Liz
Cheney (Wyo.) : " There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United
States of his office and his oath to the Constitution. I will vote to impeach the
President. "
Rep. Adam
Kinzinger (Ill.) : "There is no doubt in my mind that the President of the United
States broke his oath of office and incited this insurrection I will vote in favor of
impeachment."
Rep. Fred Upton
(Mich.) : "Enough is enough. The Congress must hold President Trump to account and send
a clear message that our country cannot and will not tolerate any effort by any President
to impede the peaceful transfer of power from one President to the next. Thus, I will vote
to impeach."
Rep. Dan Newhouse
(Wash.) : "A vote against this impeachment is a vote to validate the unacceptable
violence we witnessed in our nation's capital. ... I will vote yes on the articles of
impeachment."
Rep.
Peter Meijer (Mich.) : "With the facts at hand, I believe the article of impeachment to
be accurate. The President betrayed his oath of office by seeking to undermine our
constitutional process, and he bears responsibility for inciting the violent acts of
insurrection last week."
Rep. Anthony Gonzalez
(Ohio) : "When I consider the full scope of events leading up to January 6th including
the President's lack of response as the United States Capitol was under attack, I am
compelled to support impeachment."
Rep. Tom Rice (S.C.) : "I
have backed this President through thick and thin for four years. I campaigned for him and
voted for him twice. But, this utter failure is inexcusable."
Rep. David Valadao
(Calif.) : "Based on the facts before me, I have to go with my gut and vote my
conscience. I voted to impeach President Trump. His inciting rhetoric was un-American,
abhorrent, and absolutely an impeachable offense. It's time to put country over
politics."
At this point I don't care that some Antifa Rent-A-Mob types intermingled with the
pro-Trump crowd. That unruly mob shown considerable restraint in the face of the criminality
of our self-anointed ruling class. The vast bulk of the mob stayed within the velvet rope
line. If the riot on Capitol Hill didn't happen, the Deep State would have cooked up some
sinister post in some corner of the Internet to justify making the National Guard sleep in
the halls and shut down DC (Biden already planned a "virtual" immaculation). Thanks to this
show of force, our self-anointed rulers let their masks slip showing how craven and
contemptuous they truly are.
SwmngwShrks 18 hours ago
That IS the Deep State cooking it up. People were bussed in. The guards let the people in.
There was no forced entry. How was this violent?
This image shows Michiel Vos, Nancy Pelosi's son in law with Buffalo Man in front of the
White House. He just happened to be there as he is a newsman for a Dutch TV show. If it was
anyone but Nancy, I would suspect collusion.
It shows a noose dangling framed before the coffin of Yitzhak Rabin murdered by Zionists
in 1995 after being incited by Netanyahu allowing him eventually take control.
Finally we have Aaron Mostofsky, whose father is Judge Shlomo "Steven" Mostofsky of Kings
County Supreme Court. He is a prominent in Democratic Borough politics and a former president
of National Council of Young Israel.
Trump was not outsmarted by Dems. He was in on "the plan". The plan: Hand over the nation
to globalists on 1/20 without a fight with patriots demoralized, humiliated and living in
fear. Don't forget that the con artist set up supporters to be shamed, killed and
face-recognized on Jan 6.
Then called the National Guard on them. Now they all belong to a national database, no fly
lists. Remember: 4 years of Trump and no end to DACA, no end to birthright citizenship, no
FISA arrests, no 'lock her up', no 'drain the swamp', no wall, no voter ID. But Israel got
EVERYTHING: embassy, Golan Heights, settlements, billion$ in aid. Trump: Rothschild
puppet, Israeli double-agent.
TRM 19 hours ago remove link
Either the biggest Zionist shill since Theodore Herzl or the Mossad had the goods on him.
I know which is most likely.
Trump's owners, the military industrial complex and the zionist lobby, have thrown him
under the bus. Bummer dude but you don't get to be "the one". It is so easy to manipulate ego
maniacs.
What deal did they cut with Biden's owners (media (all 6), med-mafia (pharma on top), tech
and CIA+lawfare (DOJ, FBI, IRS))?
1) Biden will NOT end the sanctions against Iran. He may say "we'll negotiate" but it will
drag on forever.
2) The MIC gets to keep the "civilian special forces" and most importantly control of the
NSA.
So after doing all the dirty work Trump gets thrown under the bus. LMAO. Will he be a
broken man like LBJ or Nixon or will he drift off into irrelevance like most of the rest?
The central banking cartel gets what it wants (all FED chair positions, Secretary of
Treasury) for its people from both parties so they control the money which controls all else.
They have supported Bolsheviks, fascists and FDR so they have no political affiliation other
than to themselves. They are the true party of power.
Forced vaccinations, tracking and rigged "science" to justify everything are going to get
worse. To all those who think you will get a "Socialist Republic" get a grip. You will get
Chinese capitalism. The worst of both worlds. Single party dictatorship and the most
exploitative capitalist system ever. It makes the robber barons of the late 1800's roll over
in their graves in awe. The left owners worship the Chinese model.
There was no rush to judgement. This was ALL planned, probably weeks if not months
beforehand. All the leftist operatives were well prepared/rehearsed. They knew exactly who,
what, when, where, how and why. Just like they do EVERYTIME.
Templar X 20 hours ago (Edited)
This rush to not only blame President Trump for this "attack" upon Capitol Hill, but to
also use it as a false reason to impeach him is not only a wild, insane, and irresponsible
rush to judgement, it is proof positive that Nancy Pelosi is not fit for public office.
sgt_doom 17 hours ago
Exactly, exactly, exactly. The mayors and countymexecs, etc., across the nation were
reading from,the same script all using the term "white insurrectionists" --- in the
Northwesr
T my two sources notified me that the scrips,arrived a week before the 7th!
GreatCaesar'sGhost 20 hours ago
Interesting, but moot. The dems have both houses of Congress and the presidency. They will
reek havoc for at least the next 2 years. Hopefully that creepy Liz Cheney gets primaried and
loses, at least. She's sickening.
rwmctrofholz 19 hours ago
Bump this story to the top.
Secondly, didn't Matt Gaetz get shouted down/groaned at when he suggested that outside
agitators had a role at the event at the Capitol?
ItsDanger 19 hours ago
But they can't investigate election fraud? No standing? Sad
Max21c 19 hours ago
Yeah it is quite amazing how all the drama queens in the Washington establishment rushed
out to denounce the events on Capitol Hill and how quickly the phonies in the Justice
Department and law enforcement were to launch investigations and make arrests over people
barging in to the Capitol building. Yet the coup d'etat has been swept under the rug by the
Regime and its state security apparatus and the puppet journalists in the official media.
SwmngwShrks 18 hours ago remove link
After watching the Occupy Wall-Street coverage and CIA handling of how to crush dissent,
why would I trust the government's or media's word on any of this?
Musum 19 hours ago
The facts will continue to roll out
But it won't matter. The Russia Hoax proved that.
Truth and facts are the collateral damage of ideological crazies.
Max21c 19 hours ago
The people behind this all along have been deep state secret police and the intelligence
community per CIA, Pentagon Gestapo, military intelligence, military secret police, FBI,
British Gestapo and others in the cabal drawn from the ranks and world of the secret police
and intelligence community.
Cardinal Fang 19 hours ago (Edited) remove link
What I find hilarious about this whole thing is that the exact same failings of the
Benghazi attack are readily apparent in the US Capitol attack, right down to and including
the unheeded request for reinforcements.
The only difference is the panic room wasn't burned out.
And the very same people who completely downplayed the Benghazi Attack are blowing this
same type of operation way out of proportion.
We are being gaslighted.
Jolt 19 hours ago
That leaves Congress and all the jerks who voted for impeachment of President Trump
looking like boobs and losers.
No, if Pelosi and McConnell and all of their buddies knew in advance that something was
coming (and reports say it's true) and ALL refused to beef up security, passing IMPEACHMENT
was an act of treason.
But that's just another conspiracy theory...
NOT EPS TYING 19 hours ago (Edited)
The black boy antifa guy was on cnn with his white partner in crime female as a guest of
honor. i can smell the bs from a mile away, over 1000 miles away in this case. DC smells
really bad now.
Delusion Spotter 19 hours ago (Edited)
The Truth always come out. This was obviously a staged Left Wing Plot from the beginning.
The Democrats will try every dirty trick in the book to try to make sure Trump doesn't run
against and defeat Senile Joe in 2024.
Senile Joe is already off to a bad start with his sure to fail $1.9 Trillion - Pork,
Deadbeat, and Lost Cause Bonanza Plan.
Looks likes Trumps 2024 re-election will be a sure thing.
NOT EPS TYING 19 hours ago (Edited)
well the media is in big trouble now without trump. biden is more boring than watching
paint dry, unless he is not using the teleprompter.
Crush the cube 19 hours ago
No they're not finished, your still standing.
Max21c 19 hours ago (Edited)
Even the press is starting to notice that the pieces aren't fitting together. Rather
than a picture of all wicked and crazed Trump supporters, charging the Capitol, leftist
news outfit Bloomberg reported that its
survey of various parties involved , including those who died or were arrested, didn't
paint the desired picture. Conclusion?
Many of those shown in news footage had no party affiliation and voted sporadically, if
at all.
It's not unusual for the FBI & CIA to recruit and use drug addicts, alcoholics,
derelicts, day workers, and others on the margins of society as they are easy to hire through
fronts and easy to manipulate and be used by the secret police. It would not be the least
surprising therefore that many of the agent provocateurs have suspicious background, lack
stability, and come from the fringes of society as such bear the classic hallmarks of people
used as dupes and cannon fodder by the intelligence agencies. They often make use of throw
aways and disposable people and people that are vulnerable and easy to take advantage of and
easy to handle and dump. These people fit the bill quite nicely as people that can be easily
recruited by fronts and dupes and allow the puppet masters to keep it all at arms length.
slumdog_billionaire 19 hours ago
Yup!
11th_Harmonic 19 hours ago (Edited)
OBVIOUS: The 'left wing faction', the media, SillyCon Valley, and their political enablers
have:
Threatened the POTUS with physical harm (see Kathy Griffin with a severed Trump head
for a cheap example)
Engaged in a fraudulent exercise to tie the POTUS to an election victory that was
'stolen' by alleged Russian collusion
Announced that they would not allow the sitting president to be reelected, complete
with Biden's quip about 'the most fraudulent election ever'
Supported BLM and Antifa "protests" [sic] as a 'right in accordance with the 1A' while
city storefronts were boarded up and businesses were literally burned
Supported the reduction in funding to LEO's while requiring LEO's and Guardsmen for
Biden's "inauguration"
Engaged in election fraud, challenged by hundreds of sworn affidavits and actual video
footage
Threatened 'Trump voters' with imprisonment (internment), denial of access to services
and goods, and death
Allowed entire city blocks to be illegally and unlawfully occupied, including police
stations
Destroyed monuments, statues, and other national and local artifacts
Engaged in a comprehensive MSM campaign to silence debate
Doxxed opposition and trespassed on their property (see McCloskey)
Flaunted their own illegal and unlawful lockdown edicts (too many examples to
list)
De-platformed or restricted funding for independent media
Locked or disabled social media accounts for any 'language' they consider a violation
of their "policy"
Called anyone not 'on the left' "deplorable", deserving of harm
.....the list is too long to type right now
NOT OBVIOUS: Any well-thought, intelligent challenge to any of the above. You can't just
keep hoping that this will go away with time; the time for peaceful action has almost
passed.
Max21c 20 hours ago remove link
A left-wing activist who told Fox News last week that he'd followed a pro-Trump mob into
the Capitol in order to "document"
the siege is now the subject of a criminal complaint in connection with his alleged
participation, according to the U.S. Justice Department.
John Sullivan can allegedly be heard egging on protesters in video he provided to the
FBI, according to a federal criminal complaint. He has also shared the video to his YouTube
and Twitter accounts under the pseudonym Jayden X
Apparently this guy John Sullivan claims to be an ordinary America but has a very
suspicious background in allegedly being the son of a US Air Force General... and has been
apparently mixed up in suspicious activities and suspicious groups... he may even be on the
payroll and funded by front groups such as Anti-Fa or other radical front groups... Like
other elites mixed up in these radical activities they all seem to have ties to higher levels
of the government and political system... some are even Ivy Leaguers...
It would be interesting to see how many of the folks have been possibly trained by groups
associated with the National Endowment for Democracy or other radical front groups for the
deep state per CIA, State Department, Pentagon, FBI, National Security Council and rest of
the state security apparatus. It would be interesting to see how much of this is just another
British Gestapo and CIA and Pentagon Gestapo, State department elites color revolution aimed
at the overthrow of the US government and imposing a ruler over America that shall do the
biddings of the war machine and secret police machine...
On Jan. 6, pro-Trump extremists
stormed the US Capitol complex and disrupted Congress's joint session to confirm
President-elect Joe Biden's electoral victory. Days later, social media companies went on a
free speech crusade against President Trump,
banning or limiting the president from various platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, and
Snapchat.
It appears some Polish government officials have denounced big tech's censorship of Trump.
They are preparing to draft a law that will make it illegal for tech firms to ban accounts,
according to
The Guardian .
"Algorithms or the owners of corporate giants should not decide which views are right and
which are not," wrote the Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki.
"There is no and can be no consent to censorship."
Morawiecki's comments were published on Facebook days after Twitter and Facebook suspended
the US president, citing a "risk of further incitement of violence" in the wake of his
supporters storming the US Capitol building in Washington, DC.
Speaking vaguely and without mentioning Trump, Morawiecki said:
"Censorship of free speech, which is the domain of totalitarian and authoritarian regimes,
is now returning in the form of a new, commercial mechanism to combat those who think
differently," he said.
"The owners of social platforms cannot act above the law," Morawiecki added, noting that
in Poland, the functioning of Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram are regulated by law.
"We will suggest that similar regulations are also put in place in all of the European
Union," he said.
Morawiecki's comments came after German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Trump's ban from
Twitter is "problematic."
The fallout from last week's deadly raid on the Capitol has included the
purging of Parler , which is a social media app mainly used by conservatives. Apple and
Google both banned Parler from their respective app stores over concerns the app aided Trump
supporters in the Capitol attack.
Banning Trump from Twitter and other social media platforms has set dangerous precedence
where big tech companies can, at their convenience, censor anyone they want, even the president
of the US.
Sven Novgorod 2 hours ago (Edited) remove link
"On Jan 6th, pro-Trump extremists
stormed the US Capitol complex and disrupted Congress's joint session"
This article states as fact the storming of Congress is a closed case. Done and
dusted.
I say Propaganda.
No comment on the fact BLM was present or Antifa was also there. No comment on the fact,
the police encouraged people to enter the building.
Note: I could find NO Reference to this video through google. Duck Duck go...there it
was.
Ikiru 1 hour ago (Edited)
Google has become entirely useless for anyone looking for the truth. I gave a friend a
Google demonstration by punching in "election fraud", which 5 years ago would have pulled up
all sorts of information, including the massive evidence. Now, it only pulls up MSM sites and
leftist rags. I would recommend trying this with friends and family to show how Google is
manipulating the public who are unaware of their evil doings.
mcgman 1 hour ago remove link
This is the biggest problem with the right wing activist base. They run for cover and
start dumping people overboard once the going gets rough. Yes there were antifa and blm
provocateurs at the protest. But that says nothing for the 99% of the people in attendance
that were the most ardent of trump activists. They are responsible for how they behaved. But
their justification was IMMEDIATELY cooped by washington GOP talking points in saying how
"BAD THEY ARE". Rather than pointing out how they have been systematically disenfranchised
and targeted over the last 4 years. The activist base on the right needs to take a lesson
from the left. Did you see democrats running for cover and throwing their base under the bus
over the summer when the country was on fire ? absolutely NOT. Jerry Nadler told everyone it
was a myth and to go piss up a rope. The GOP is the party of fools which is why they are
allowing their most ardent supporters to be put on corporate blacklists and DHS no fly lists.
If the right intends to be politically active they have a LOT of learning to do. This event
exposes why the movement on the right is so weak politically.
Sandwich 2 hours ago
Hey ZH, nobody stormed anything. It was a guided tour.
Debtman And Robbin 1 hour ago
I saw members of Congress storming out on live TV.
On Jan. 6, pro-Trump extremists
stormed the US Capitol complex
Get your facts straight, Tyler. They weren't extremists, the Capitol wasn't "stormed" and
some of them weren't even Trump supporters.
Pigeon 1 hour ago (Edited)
+1000
This sort of fake-news editorializing happens far too frequently here. How long until
Tylers go full-Drudge?
FYI, did you see American Thinker turned off comments (and those were hosted by POS
Vuukle). Can't take a chance on someone saying something naughty.
These sites are shooting themselves in the foot. Personally, my time online has dropped
50% - and will continue to drop as I detox myself from the stupidity , manipulation and
propaganda.
Trump should have been at the head of his army of supporters, leading them down
Pennsylvania Avenue as voting fraud evidence was examined in Congress. It would have been a
powerful and wondrous photo op. Why didn't he? Why did he learn nothing from
Charlottesville?
Also, why hasn't he pardoned the Proud Boys, James Fields, Assange, etc.? Why did he,
yet again, jump to do Israel's bidding by pardoning Kushner's corrupt father and freeing
Israeli spy Pollard? Now every pro-Trump media talking-head BEGINS by atoning for the fake
"insurrection."
The Republican party is dead, filled with rabid RINOs and masochistic Swampussies. Why
would ANY Trumper ever vote again, knowing that election-machinery is rigged? Finally, what
good does it do now for Don to unseal the evidence used against him? That should have been
done years ago, when it mattered.
"Trump and his supporters had to be blackened and discredited with an orchestrated event
that stopped the presentation of the evidence of electoral fraud and replaced it with an
"insurrection against democracy by MAGA terrorists." Or: "THE SWAMP STRIKES BACK."
what i can't understand is why would trump send his followers to the capitol at the
precise time the evidence is about to be read into the congressional record. ted cruz (not
that i like or trust him) was about to present "evidence" that would have been available to
the public, that is now buried and resulted in calls for his resignation. they had to know
that there would be provocateurs after charlotte, i wonder if trump hadn't cut a deal to
throw his supporters under the bus in order to save his ass, or if the whole deal is just a
massive scripted psyops for the last four years.
@My SIMPLE Pseudonymic Handle ations are either dissolved or they merge with the
artificial ones, but always in subordinate roles.
Basically, instead of going out to find the radicals you attract them to you. Now you know
where they all are and what they are doing. Even better, you are now in command of those very
radicalized individuals who want to take you down. Sweet! If you need to thin their ranks you
just hatch a fake plot to do whatever and send the ones to die into a kill zone that your
military has set up somewhere. Not only do you get rid of some radicals but you build a
reputation of omniscience and invulnerability around your military. Alternatively you can
steer two or more of your controlled radical organizations into conflict with each other,
killing more radicals and building the reputation of your opponents as being a bunch of
idiots who kill their own.
@lloyd s been given "Get Out Of Jail Free Cards" for violence before and he is out of jail
now – – others (fools) who followed him into the Capitol (which he is on tape
inside urging them to "burn it down") have NO Bail and face decades in Prison (Buffalo Horn
head guy) -- the FBI is nothing but a NWO KGB -- they "infiltrate" or set up all the "violence"
we see to use it so our Rights can be stripped away as we are now seeing and have since the 911
False Flag which they also knew about, allowed, and covered up -- it is all theater to be used
to destroy us for the NWO Globalist Agenda:
https://national-justice.com/black-lives-matter-organizer-seen-entering-capitol-building-crowd-likely-fbi-agent-provocateur
So you may be on to something. He may be the key witness in the Ashli case. He was certainly
most seriously shocked by it.
This is Sullivan's documentary. The murder scene is real. It is extremely difficult to
watch, but occurs near the end, at about 1:11. The rest is incredibly good footage. Every
second person in the protest was taking pics. No one had weapons. The man who broke the window
for Ashli to climb through was probably the same one who snuck down the stairs to change his
clothes right after, so most probably Antifa.
The neoliberal MSM and various talking heads now lecture us that the black supremacist and
radical left looting of Target stores and businesses on main street and firebombing police
precincts and a federal building and killing and maiming dozens of people over a five month
period is far less serious than storming the Capitol building, stealing Nancy Pelosi's holy
lectern and taking some selfies.
So if the pro-Trump "Capitol rioters" would have just destroyed the nearest Target store
and police precinct and used fire extinguishers on wheel chair bound black women then that
would have been ok with CNN. But dare to make mischief at the holy Capitol building and all
bets are off and it's time for the firing squads and drone strikes. At least for right
wingers.
Of course the amnesiac neoliberal morons forgot that they attempted to storm the White
House in late May 2020 but of course that is Democracy in action and whenever blacks and
leftists riot we better sit up and take notice and do some serious soul searching because we
brought it upon ourselves.
Suddenly, neoliberal media, some BLM leaders and assorted left wing gas bags have morphed
into back the bluetards and are celebrating the murder of unarmed white woman Ashli Babbitt
by a black Capitol police officer. Surprisingly, BLM activist Shaun King, a.k.a. "Martin
Luther Cream", actually showed some principle and said the shooting was unwarranted.
So, I must ask, does Chuck Schumer REALLY want to try Trump in the Senate on the charges
submitted by the House? Because, if so, is not Trump entitled to a defense a defense that may
include evidence touching on all the issues you raised in your piece, Mr. Roberts?
At this point the name of the game is the Democrats trying to besmirch Trump's reputation
to the point where he can never participate in the American political system ever again. This
is why Schumer says he would try Trump even if January 20th were the last possible
opportunity to do so. And, if he missed that deadline, that he would try him AFTER his
presidential term as a private citizen, all to i) punish him with jail time to underscore a
definitive "win" in the history books for his hardball party politics and ii) preclude him
from ever seeking the presidency again because of disqualification under the relevant
constitutional amendment, or having the credibility to back another candidate or create his
own political party/movement.
Does Mr. Schumer think that he can present only one side of the story in any such Senate
trial? Does he think Trump will not be allowed to defend himself with evidence? Or at least
with contentions claimed to be evidence which would then have to be examined in detail before
the Senate to establish its status as evidence or not? And, unless the Senate trial is a
secret kangaroo court closed to the public, whatever is presented to the Senate is now
revealed to the public and the scenario you paint in your article, Mr. Roberts, should
ultimately be revealed in glorious technicolor to all.
Am I right? Or does Schumer in the Senate have the same prerogatives to short circuit
constitutionally guaranteed rights of legal self-defense that Pelosi seemingly employed in
the House where only "evidence" provided by the prosecution was allowed? Will Trump, or his
lawyers, simply be made to stand in the dock and listen to the accusations with no allowance
for rebuttal? Well, that certainly should not impress the public either. I daresay that kind
of performance would lead not to the "blue tide" in coming elections that the Dems envision
in their dreams but to their next "shellacking," as their silver-tongued Nobel laureate put
it.
If Trump is given the legal rights usually extended to most multibillionaires in the
American legal system, he should be able to tie up the Senate's time for months or even years
to come whilst embarrassing the left side of the aisle no end. I know, justice in the
Congress does not take the same form and maybe does not provide the same protections as in
the courts, but appearances alone should be a consideration for both sides in this matter.
Does it appear that justice and fairness are being applied, or does it look like raw power
politics, cold retribution with an old fashioned tar and feathering? So, I again pose the
question, does Schumer really want to try Trump in the Senate for his alleged "high crimes
and misdemeanors?" I also wonder, if Schumer's dream case against Trump goes awry and the
Dems stand to be humiliated with the truth and with evidence of their own crimes, could we
ultimately be seeing a resolution similar to the Milosevic case at the Hague? Could the
Russians be framed once again for exposing their alleged puppet to a fatal dose of novichok?
(Pelosi and the Queen of Warmongers would claim Putin didn't trust the Donald not to spill
his guts on their grand conspiracy to rule the world together.) I know, sounds crazy, but
what that has happened during the last four years has not been crazy?
...Does anyone share my belief that the "requirement" for heavily armed guards and
barricades around state capitols, based on FBI threat assessment that ProudBoys and
other white supremacist/deplorables/smellies plan armed attacks in protest of Biden's
inauguration is the prequel to imposition of martial law and/or a false flag?
I've never used FB and don't understand how or why to use Twitter.
I don't have TV and haven't watched MSM or cable news for about a decade.
I do, however, -- or did -- watch C Span, including Washington Journal almost
religiously.
This morning's Wash. Journ. was outrageous. Moderator Jesse Holland, who teaches
journalism, if I'm not mistaken, opened with, "The insurrectionist riots have the nation on
edge . . ." Luge downhill from there.
C Span has revealed itself as Propaganda Central. Moderators proclaim themselves to be
"objective" and even invisible: the callers are the focus. But especially since the beginning
of the pandemic, and blatantly since the election & ensuing controversy, Moderators
produce heavily loaded questions that function more as conditioners- normalizers; they
validate callers who conform to the party line; and they argue with or cut off callers who
disagree with the party line, even when such callers present articulate and soundly sourced
information.
Brian Lamb retired in 2012 but remained a presence until about 2 years ago, and to the
best of my knowledge has not appeared on the network, in person, since 2018. I believe the C
Span project has morphed into something he did not anticipate and might not endorse.
Who made the decision and why is it thought necessary to turn central DC into the
equivalent of the Green Zone in Baghdad? With an estimated 30,000 troops, 50 odd medium
armour Strikers, engineers, drones plus goodness knows what else.
I understand that it is a 30 day deployment, why for so long after the inauguration?
As military Intel is usually good they surely can't be expecting strike columns of
Deplorables in their 'technicals' a la ISIS?
This quite naturally leads to the theory that if they are not to keep someone out, maybe
they are there for the opposite. We will know in a few days.
While establishment Republicans and Democrats and the mainstream media continue to blame
Trump and his supporters for violent riots at the Capitol, they entirely ignored a Jan. 8
Reuters interview where he
admitted "three or four groups of loyalists under his command helped storm the Capitol "
and "embraced the moment to strike against the government."
Asked whether boogaloos had planned to attack the Capitol on Jan. 6, he
told the publication, "Just know there is more to come."
The 22-year-old Boogaloo leader and Virginia resident bragged about "infiltrating" MAGA
during the riot and scoffed at Trump supporters for adhering to the 6pm citywide curfew for
the District of Columbia mandated
on Jan 6.
"After MAGA and others stormed the capital building in a moment of anger (which was cool)
they retreated to hotels to comply with the Curfew. We obviously didn't stayed out in the
streets until 12," he tweeted on Jan. 7.
In response to another Twitter user, he claimed, "Those were infiltrators, not real MAGA,"
Dunn gloated, "Yeh, we know."
While a Google
search of the Boogaloo movement would have you believe the group is comprised of "far
right," "white supremacist" Trump supporters, the Boogaloo Bois are actually a far-left group
aligned with Black Lives Matter in their disdain for Trump and Republicans.
On Jan. 15, 2021, a slight wrinkle was added to this rumor: Not only was antifa responsible for the attack, but so was CNN. A
viral video supposedly showing "
CNN's
Own
" Jade Sacker quickly racked up more than 2 million views as it circulated on Twitter. Other postings of this video
labeled Sacker as "
CNN
photojournalist
" or "
CNN
reporter
."
While this video was widely shared as if it showed a woman named Jade Sacker, we have not been able to independently verify this.
If this video truly does show Sacker, however, it's important to note Sacker is not an employee of CNN. Describing her as "CNN's
own" or "CNN reporter Jade Sacker" is inaccurate.
Sacker is a
freelance
photojournalist
who documented the pro-Trump mob storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. She is not, nor has she ever been,
employed by CNN.
Matt Dornic, the head of strategic communications for CNN Worldwide, wrote on
Twitter
that
"no one named Jade Sacker works for CNN."
A
spokesperson for CNN reiterated this point to us in an email, writing: "Jade Sacker has never worked for CNN."
So, where does this rumor come from?
On the evening of Jan. 6, Sacker appeared on "Anderson Cooper 360" alongside a man named John Sullivan to talk about what they
saw during the Capitol riot. Specially, these two appeared on the network to discuss a piece of footage captured by Sullivan that
showed the shooting death of a woman inside the Capitol. Here's a screenshot from that interview:
Sacker appeared on CNN because she was a witness to the Capitol riot, not because she was employed by CNN, or because she was
hired by the network to report from the event.
It should be noted that Sullivan was
arrested
by
the FBI for his alleged involvement in the riot a few days after this interview. While Sullivan claims that he was at the Capitol
to document the event as a journalist, the
FBI
affidavit
notes that Sullivan can be heard on video yelling things like "we about to burn this shit down" and "we
accomplished this shit. We did this together. Fuck yeah! We are all a part of this history."
News of Sullivan's arrest was widely spread on social media attached to the misleading claim that he was a leader of antifa. We
took a deeper look into Sullivan's alleged ties to
antifa
and Black Lives Matter here
.
I've previously compared our time to the Revolutions of 1848 and so I reject the notion
that these events can be compared to a genuine underclass rebellion. The people who stormed
the Capitol are easily divided into two groups; the petty bourgeoisie and lumpen-proletariat.
The lumpen proletariat is playing a similar role to what they did during 1848 as useful pawns
of reactionary forces. While the petty bourgeoisie in America has seen it's economic
prosperity threatened by the pandemic and are seething with fury at the federal/state
government(s) after years of anti-government propaganda from the likes of Fox News and/or
other "conservative" sources.
In any capitalist system the middle classes typically lack the political influence to be
made whole by the State in any emergency and unknowingly live their lives on the edge of
ruin. We saw this with the CARES Act when the largest chunk of the Paycheck Protection loans
went to politically connected businesses. Babbitt is somewhere in the cross section between
these groups. A former soldier without any dedicated profession nevertheless tries to start a
business in a monopolistic service industry dominated by capital.
There isn't anything that can convince me her unnecessary and tragic death wasn't a
suicide by cop. A former soldier or failed businesswoman attempting to breach a barricade
with armed people behind it seems like a clear-cut example.
while i disagree with your last paragraph, i think you're right about the class content of
the assaulters. I believe it was Marx who talked about the outrage of the petty bourgeoise
(if not, then it was Lenin, can't remember). anyway the pb lacks the sweeping world view an
enlightened working class and sees the world in terms of its narrow and short term interests,
which right now are desperate and dismal.
Interestingly enough, or maybe not, the ranks of Antifa are also made up of the pb.
I'd have to say that Antifa types are petty bourgeoisie with lumpen inclinations. The
common characteristic that defines the lumpen is the inability to view itself with any degree
of class awareness. The issue of class is an abstract theory to most of them. They can't
connect the challenges of being lower class to their own personal life or contemporary peer's
experience.
That very prevalence of abstract thought is commonly found in ages of decline/collapse
though.
There is nothing more conducive to the destruction of a nation, whether it be a
republic or monarchy, than the lack of men of wisdom or intellect. When a republic has many
citizens, or a monarchy many ministers, of high quality it quickly recovers from losses
that are brought about by misfortune. When such men are lacking, it falls into the very
depths of disgrace. That is why I deplore the present state of the Empire which, having
produced so many excellent men in the past, has now been reduced to such a level of
sterility that today's governors possess nothing to elevate them above whom they
govern. -John Cantacuzenus
That quote also seems to perfectly summarise the reason behind the current Brexit and
Covid19 situation in the (dis)UK. Little cause for optimism there methinks.
If there was any real party of the proletariat in the US, it would be pushing to
incorporate the petty bourgeoisie into an alliance with the gig workers/retail workers who
make up today's proletariat. As Marx pointed out in the Communist Manifesto, the lower middle
class are becoming revolutionary "in view of its impending transfer into the proletariat,"
and it should be the goal of the left to partner with this class, not alienate them.
21st Century America's petty bourgeoisie is rather large as it consists of not only
traditional small business owners, but also the kin to the working classes of the 70's and
80s, who benefited from the century of union activism that preceded them. They grew up middle
class and in relative comfort, and they still have some of the wealth left over from the
past. But now they see the only future for them and their children under Neoliberalism is
downward. Since there is no movement from the left, they easily fall prey to the right and
slogans like MAGA.
The mistake I see is partisan thinking. "Working class people who vote for the GOP are
voting against their own interests." Perhaps, provided we add "working class people who vote
for the Democrats are voting against their own interests." The government serves the
oligarchs, and GOP or Dem just expresses the tilt, is it going to be handouts for Hollywood
or Oil and Gas?
Neither of these parties serves the interests of anyone except the ultrawealthy. You're
more likely to get better representation voting in a local Chinese election, because at least
the candidate hasn't been bought off by corporations. As long as the 99% continues to turn on
each other in the fight over the table scraps, and keeps voting for these two corrupt "lesser
of two evils", the result will be more evil.
... It's not hard to imagine that a decent proportion of the rioters were small business
owners, like the woman who was fatally shot, Ashli Babbitt, who operated a pool service company
with her husband. Small businesspeople have been the loudest opponents of lockdowns and other
restrictions on Covid and some are even of the "Covid is a hoax" school. Yes, they favored
Trump for economic reasons: they benefitted from his tax reforms and were keen about his
refusal to support aggressive Covid containment measures.
By the same token, the events of January 6th should be viewed as the point U.S. political
dysfunction reached its breaking point. While the country still appears to remain economically
powerful, it has become politically weak and socially fragile in ways characteristic of a
society in decline. The focus on the relatively small group
that broke into the Capitol as a result of lax security is akin to focusing on the Beirut
blast wreckage to the exclusion of all else. Far more significant are the surveys of
representative samples of Americans that reveal deepening mistrust
of the core institutions and a growing commitment to sectarian interests which have, in
many parts of the nation, superseded commitment to the republic itself.
This sheds a different light on the events. While the spark that ignited the violent
pro-Trump upheaval was the incumbent's allegations that the November Presidential election was
fraudulent, for many the assault on the Capitol was also an insurgency against the entire
political class. "All these politicians work for us. We pay their salaries, we pay our taxes.
And what do we get? Nothing. All of them inside are traitors" -- as a
member of the mob stated .
On this particular point, the grievances of the violent mob and the findings of scholars
align: America is an oligarchy, not a functioning democracy, as the detailed study by Martin Gilens and
Benjamin Page argued in 2014. Thus, much as this was an assault on American democracy, the
storming of the Capitol was also a sign that American democracy had already failed. Surely,
these clumsy "revolutionaries" did not storm the Capitol because they are living the American
Dream -- and they are blaming, unsurprisingly, the whole political class for their malaise.
Whenever economic explanations of this radicalization are attempted, inequality is singled
out as the root of working-class discontent. Commentators from Joseph Stiglitz to Thomas Piketty or Emmaunuel Saez relentlessly hammer on one theme above all
others: an economic inequality that has deep roots in the political system. A cross-party
consensus is now emerging on fighting inequality through redistribution -- from raising the
minimum wage to increasing unemployment benefits.
One reason why inequality has attracted so much attention is that it is easily measurable.
Indeed, reports of the top 1% of
Americans taking $50 trillion from the bottom 90% easily appeal to our sense of injustice.
However, there are studies
of the white working class which reveal that despite the outrage about inequality, many in this
demographic still admire the rich. Additionally, the singular focus on economic inequality
obscures another phenomenon -- the massive economic insecurity which is affecting broader
swathes of the population beyond the 'precariat' (those in poorly paid and insecure jobs).
While insecurity is not easy to measure and report, it is in fact at the root of the social malaise of Western societies.
Seeing economic precarity as a root cause also helps to better explain why so much of the
working-class radicalization has taken a turn to the right. Right-wing populists specifically
evoke language that triggers conservative instincts -- the evocation of family, a desire for
stability, for clinging strongly to what is familiar ("Make America Great Again"), as opposed
to plunging into political experimentation with something new -- with the "foreign", to the
American mind, European-style social democracy (especially when combined with "woke" issues
that tend to alienate). On the other hand, many on the libertarian right champion free market
fundamentalism, which fosters competitive, rather than solidaristic attitudes -- especially
when public goods are converted into private rents via privatization, which in turn limits
access to resources that mitigate the effects of that intense competition instead of enhancing
social solidarity.
Even under recent Democratic Administrations, economic recovery from the 2008 financial
meltdown happened through a growth in insecure employment. The services jobs that fueled U.S.
economic growth for the past 40 years -- until the pandemic began to destroy them --
were numerous, but of low quality. The rise of neoliberalism at the expense of the
conservative-liberal divide that preceded it has enabled employers to tilt the terms of our
capitalist economies heavily toward capital and away from labor, via the evisceration of
unions, the deconstruction of the welfare state, and the privatization of public services. Most
importantly, funding for public services and social programs has been persistently slashed. It
is this impoverishment of the public commons that has increased the importance of personal
wealth in securing essential goods such as healthcare and education. Thus, economic inequality
matters enormously, but as a grave symptom of a broader problem -- that of massive, and
growing, fragility of society as a whole. The erosion of the public sector precludes access to
many of the social supports that have historically buttressed economic security.
As a result, the American economy has begun to resemble a new, modern feudalism with a small
technocracy dominated by Silicon Valley tech overlords and Wall Street billionaires at the top,
and a large, uneducated, rapidly growing serf class at the bottom with no social safety net to
protect it. . Even if the wealth gap were to be considerably reduced by transfer from rich to
poor, precarity would persist because it is rooted not in inequality, but in a depleted public
sector, in a public authority that has abandoned the public and increasingly become a
vehicle for predatory capitalism .
The pandemic exacerbated both the inequality and the precarity. Wall Street and the stock
market have boomed over the past several months, generating affluence imbued with unprecedented
levels of risk. At the same time, job growth has collapsed, and unemployment remains stubbornly
high. Millions of Americans have withdrawn from the labor force, their jobs likely destroyed
for good as the long-term impact of the economic shutdown wreaks havoc in many industries.
That has become a literal life consequence for working people in a system that continues to
introduce restrictions to curb the pandemic. It is a particularly acute paradox in the United
States, where healthcare remains largely predicated to employment via employer-funded
healthcare systems. So we have the makings of a vicious cycle: restrictions are introduced to
slow the pandemic, which in turn creates further job losses, which in turn can mean loss of
employment and, hence, loss of access to healthcare provision. The very policies designed to
safeguard health, then, ultimately exacerbate the problem. Add all of these factors together,
align it with a demagogue working to undermine an election result, and you get the ingredients
for a very poisonous outbreak of the kind we witnessed on January 6th.
The forces that led to the evisceration of working-class security is now extending to those
ensconced in historically well-paid jobs, from lawyers to IT engineers. Even in the midst of a
severe recession and a rapidly accelerating pandemic, policy makers
remain remarkably indifferent to these trends and the ongoing precarity . They persist in
believing that what has happened is merely a disruption to a solid structure, a deviation from
normality, all of which can be rectified by the right mix of policy stimulus. A growing
political consensus in the United States to tackle inequality appears to be emerging
(especially in the wake of the recent Georgia run-off election, which put the Senate back under
the control of the Democratic Party). But no matter how equal society becomes in terms of
wealth distribution, without a dramatic government investment in public services, notably
education, healthcare provision, and job security, trust and disillusionment in American
institutions will persist, and with that also the rise of militancy by a radicalized
underclass.
Generally people attending protests aren't poor people. Poor people are living from
paycheck to paycheck. They need to work to survive. It is expensive to attend a protest. The
travel and other costs along with lost wages if you are a working person aren't affordable.
Many are funded by dark money, live off of parents or are borne into privilege. Actually many
were protesting against a system that favors them. It is a small but vocal part of the
population. People need to take these hate groups seriously. They are the biggest threat to
our democracy that exists. The Southern Poverty Law Center has been warning us about this
hate groups for decades. It is time we take the warning seriously.
i don't know, it was probably a mix of classes. I do know that I attended many many demos
in the 60s in DC and always travelled by bus with many others. often we'd have a car wash to
raise money for the bus. it was cheap and effective. and as a college student i didn't have
much disposable income and often had to rely on the generosity of others. as for getting
arrested, who thinks they're going to be arrested?
I tend to agree. It is important not to judge them by what they looked like. It's like
what happens at Sturgis. Many of the bikers are doctors, lawyers, techies, etc., but they
grow beards and shave their heads, and generally 'dress down' for the event. I think that
often happens at MAGA rallies too. Most of the MAGA types I know are small businessmen, i.e.,
the guy who owns a house painting business, or an auto repair place, or a small construction
yard.
And safety forces -- almost all police officers and firefighters are unionized. While
starting pay can be very low, benefits are excellent, and promotions plus regular raises mean
these workers are usually solidly middle class. And tragically for this country, it seems
they often identify with the predator class more than they do with the precariat.
Most of them seem to be petit bourgeois, which traditionally forms the base of
right-wing/fascist movements. While it might have been white working class defectors from the
Democratic Party who put Trump over the top in 2016 (as in the many thousands in swing states
who voted for Obama before turning to Trump), his base is otherwise similar to that of more
conventional Republicans.
As Adolph Reed has pointed out, #McResistance Media, LLC, has racialized the term "working
class" to mean "white working class," the better to shame, scold and divide.
One local (Northern Calif) retail business owner I deal with stated that "Trump is better
for business" prior to the election, indicating his support for Trump.
Another time, he mentioned that he was "behind on the rent" for his building.
But this business owner still has a small and loyal workforce that he, somehow, pays.
Trump was the carny barker selling his version of (Obama) hope.
And great many USA people are hoping for their lot to improve.
In my view, the Democrats had an opportunity to work with Trump for the betterment of the
country from January 2017 to January 2021.
Instead they ridiculed him and accused him of being a traitorous Russian dupe and
unleashed the national security state on him..
Maybe if the Democrats had swallowed their pride and dealt in a less adversarial manner
with the unworthy Trump, the USA and the world would be better off.
De-facto ignoring the long term economic issues (wages, healthcare, education,
infrastructure) in the USA is policy for both parties.
And people USED to look to the Democrats as the party that actually cared for the less
well off as in LBJ's War on Poverty.
I'm now expecting "Biden Disappointment Syndrome" to unfold after Jan 21 in Biden
supporters.
when you violently assault the Capitol for the purpose of overturning and election and
beat a police officer to death, people are going to say very mean things about you.
Depends on what you mean by "you." First hand accounts of the riot suggest that only a
hard core were out to break into the building (and may have already been at the Capitol as
Trump was speaking on the Ellipse). Many others simply walked in almost as tourists when the
guards stepped aside. It's also unclear so far who these militant people were although they
could have been Proud Boys. The Capitol policeman inside was killed by one person who hit him
in the head with a fire extinguisher.
Greg Palast has an article saying that the rally did not have a permit to gather at the
Capitol and that may be the reason it was so thinly defended (together one must suggest with
incompetence by the now resigned head of the Capitol police). Perhaps the whole incident is
more a matter of "stuff happens" than some deep dark insurrectionist plan.
I agree with your take. The Gray Zone piece by Max Blumenthal that someone linked to here
a few days ago is the only report I've seen by a reporter who was in the crowd at the scene.
Blumenthal reported that there was definitely a core group who had violent intentions, but
they were far from the majority. Sounds like that core used the larger protest as camouflage
to some extent. Blumenthal also reported that there were many in the crowd who to him at
least had some clear mental health issues.
I think the 6th was as you described – stuff happens. If more riots break out in the
coming weeks though, that will no longer be the case. And telling people they'll get $1,400
right after you specifically promised them $2,000 isn't exactly the best way to calm the
restless masses.
As many have noted here, the crowd was not the poorest of the poor. There have been
reports that some pooled funds to charter private jets to the protest. A lot of what you
might call petit bourgeoisie – small business owners and merchants.
And I sincerely hope that people don't misunderstand my point since I am not trying in any
way to make a direct comparison between the participants in the riots of the 6th who I've
never met and people from a couple centuries ago who I've also never met, but here's a list
of some other petit bourgeoisie with an axe to grind – Ben Franklin, Sam Adams, Paul
Revere .
The point is, regardless of the particular grievances of today's rioters and the
revolutionaries of yesteryear, these things very rarely start with the poorest of the poor
– they start when there is middle class backing, and as we all know, the middle class
in the US has been under legislative assault from both parties for decades now.
Thanks for that – great article. This was particularly interesting –
He said there were agitators wearing military-style clothing along the route from the
rally to the Capitol trying to get the crowd fired up, but he repeated that the majority of
people were just there to peacefully protest. "There were people trying to incite the crowd
and I remember yelling at one. Maybe we should have grabbed their megaphones. I'm not there
to get in a fight with anyone. There were people there to incite the crowd. No one was
listening to them."
And for some strange reason, no matter the protest, if things do get violent we just never
seem to be able to identify these types of agitators
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/15/politics/capitol-capture-assassinate-elected-officials/index.html
(CNN)Justice Department prosecutors have formally walked back their assertion in a court
filing that said Capitol rioters sought to "capture and assassinate elected officials."
==========================================
Well, kudos to CNN for reporting against ideology. I wonder if people who appear on CNN TV
will get the memo . And with regard to class of the protestors/rioters, it probably was an
amalgam of well off AND people, IMHO, rightly justified in being cynical about the people who
inhabit congress and the CORRUPT SYSTEM we have in the US that puts them in that building.
People who don't read right wing publications would probably be surprised that a significant
portion of the readers of such publications DO NOT support the thin blue line. –
remember that an awful lot of unarmed white men get shot dead by police too. (National Review
often points out unjustified police shootings of both black and white).
One of the problems with our MSM and social media is the idea that you either support or
oppose 100% of what Trump ostensibly says (as Trump says so much that is contradictory,
meaningless, or so much that just doesn't make sense, it really doesn't mean much to divide
people based on such a criterion).
In this case, prosecutors seem to have leveled charges that I would say were premature at
BEST, and perhaps due to an overly anti Trump animus (as always, I note that I despise Trump,
but I will not defend the indefensible). REMEMBER that a good portion of the FBI and DoJ
believed that Russiagate was a thing? Dare I say it – this insurrection was
Trumped up? Maybe some conservatives believe, with good cause, that US policing and security
functions aren't all that just. There is a movie out now about MLK and the FBI – people
on the "left" should see it so that they no longer hold in thrall the FBI and DoJ one should
never knee jerk defend or criticize the police.
" The Capitol policeman inside was killed by one person who hit him in the head with a
fire extinguisher."
Based on video and common sense it's fairly clear that most of the people milling around in
front of the Capitol on January 6th had no intention of storming it. And they're quite vocal
now about how "obvious"* that should be. However. If they're comfortable blaming younger,
darker, less privileged Americans for "enabling" the real vandals this past summer .. I feel
comfortable holding them to the same account.
They provided cover and validation for the nutjob vandals and the genuinely dangerous (but
rare) neofascists who led those charges into the Capitol. With the intent of stopping our
legal, orderly transition of power based on an election. However fraught the validity of the
election may be, or be claimed to have been, the people who tried to upend it 'cause they so
love God Emperor Trump . they need to serve time. Lotsa time.
And the 'nonviolent' middle aged party animals who made it possible with their numbers,
and their expensive Trump flags and camo gear, need to grow up and acknowledge the real
duties of adult citizens. Just like the tiresome woke 'kids' who dominated the news this
summer.
*(I have the sense that we are just expected to 'know' they must be virtuous, on account
of their country music fan looks and saintly Republicanism.)
I don't think any of us are arguing that Trump and his people should be blameless for
letting his protest rally get out of control. But the Whataboutism cuts both ways. During the
Floyd protests the media and the Dems were quick to assert that the worst violence was the
fault of agent provocateurs but are unwilling to say the same about 1/6. Some of those
militants may not even have been Trump supporters but rather anarchist types out for
excitement. Too little is known to jump to conclusions.
Which is why if anything the House should have gone for censure rather than snap
impeachment. And the new talk about "domestic terrorism" is a huge overreach.
White supremacists present the gravest terror threat to the United States, according to
a draft report from the Department of Homeland Security.
Two later draft versions of the same document -- all of which were reviewed by POLITICO
-- describe the threat from white supremacists in slightly different language. But all
three drafts describe the threat from white supremacists as the deadliest domestic terror
threat facing the U.S., listed above the immediate danger from foreign terrorist
groups.
" Some of those militants may not even have been Trump supporters but rather anarchist
types out for excitement. Too little is known to jump to conclusions."
Implicit in this statement is the notion that "some of them" may have been Antifa-like
false flag, super undercover rodent-effers. After living in these Untied States for 59 years,
I suspect this comfortable idea is a pile of hooey. We're not dealing with a horde of
super-Machiavellis here. Just over excited heels who tend to congregate with those whom
they're most comfortable around.
Yeah, saw that interview yesterday. But then I remembered that this guy actually applied
for that job, is on about $65,000 a year with full pension and health benefits so he has a
lot of security in his life, unlike a lot of the people in that riot, so bleep him
too. And I bet that that neck tattoo would bar him from a lot of other jobs too.
But like yourself, I seriously doubt that there were any Antifa types in that riot as that
would be like a mouse at a cat convention. From the videos that I have seen, their style is
to do their stuff when they have superior numbers and are masked so that they could not be
identified.
As reflected in several discussions at NC, we don't have a clear picture of the economic
status of the participants. Sure, there's an argument to be made that, whatever the mix of
petit bourgeois or working class, arriving by private plane or shared rides or rented buses,
their economic situation, like that of most people now, is somewhere between precarious and
more severely distressed.
However, that's not what they were protesting. They were protesting that their preferred
candidate didn't win the election, that votes of people not-like-them were counted; and they
were willing to use disruption and violence to thwart the legal process of finalizing the
election.
Blumenthal who was there said some who scaled the walls seemed military or trained.
Lambert then said from the video he thought they looked more like the people who attacked the
Federal Courthouse in Portland.
And please read what I said carefully–that we don't know who they were but it's
unlikely that the ones scaling walls were small business people. I also said they could be
Proud Boys.
Also check out that Palast link on radical elements that were planning to cause
trouble.
I don't think I'm the one who is jumping to conclusions here.
I'm not keen about Blumenthal's reporting. He's mixed second-hand accounts with his and
presented them all as first hand, or elided them so you can't tell which is which.
And why do you assume people who are fit are military? I'm a small business person and a
fitness enthusiast. Before my hip was busted three years ago, I could have scaled a wall (I
probably wouldn't have due to the risk of falling on concrete). They have scaling walls in
some fancy gyms, along with climbing ropes. And there's also the cohort of people who are
climbers and scale pretty sheer rockfaces for fun. Gah.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – A Utah man was charged today in federal court in the District of
Columbia in connection with the riots at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021.
John Earle Sullivan was charged by complaint with one count of knowingly entering or
remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority, one count of violent
entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds, and one count of interfering with law
enforcement engaged in the lawful performance of their official duties incident to and during
the commission of civil disorder. The defendant was arrested today in Utah.
The Complaint alleges that during the events at the U.S. Capitol, Sullivan, wearing a
ballistics vest and gas mask, entered the U.S. Capitol through a window that had been broken
out, pushing past U.S. Capitol Police once inside. The Complaint also alleges that Sullivan
admits to filming and being depicted in video footage that shows him present, outside of the
Speaker's Lobby within the U.S. Capitol, at the shooting of a woman by a U.S. Capitol Police
officer.
Social media is aflame after it emerged that
John Earle Sullivan , a Utah-based Black Lives Matter organizer, was one of the people who
entered the Capitol building with Trump-supporters on Wednesday.
Some are theorizing that Sullivan, who
was arrested on felony rioting and multiple other charges last Summer after a shooting in
Provo, is part of a Black Lives Matter conspiracy to make Trump-supporters look bad. Sullivan,
the leader of Insurgence USA, was filmed in July as the ringleader directing a group of armed
men who
trapped a car and opened fire on the motorist .
Yet unlike dozens of others arrested
by the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) after they left the Capitol building, Sullivan was
released without charges after a short detention.
Despite the Department of Justice and FBI vowing to viciously punish every individual who
entered the federal building, Sullivan continues to do public interviews incriminating himself
after online sleuths identified him. He also witnessed and filmed the shooting of the unarmed
white woman Ashli Babbitt by a black federal agent, but refuses to publish the footage.
While it is certain that Sullivan was at the Trump march to collect intelligence and act
as an agent provocateur, evidence suggests he was operating on behalf of the FBI rather than
Antifa.
Ideological Informants
During the anarchist riots last summer, National Justice learned of four separate
instances of FBI agents approaching members of the Proud Boys and similar groups, offering to
pay them large sums of money to fly to Portland and join the Antifa riots to collect evidence
to help stop left-wing violence. The Antifa crackdown never materialized.
As they attempted to recruit Proud Boys, the FBI was using the media to seed a baseless
claim about
far-right provocateurs inciting all the violence at George Floyd riots.
The FBI dangles the prospect of retaliation against ideological enemies as a recruiting tool
for informants and marks. While the offer made to right-wing activists has always been a sham
later used to entrap them, the FBI is
sympathetic to the Black Lives Matter cause.
The FBI At The Capitol
A new article published by Pro Publica suggests that FBI agents and informants played some kind of role
at the Stop The Steal rally.
According to the report, the FBI knocked on the doors the day before the event and told
various conservative figures they should not attend the First Amendment protest on behalf of
the president. Federal agents played a role in the MPD's decision to arrest Proud Boy leader
Enrique Tarrio on weak charges.
Trump-supporter Milo Yiannopolous told
his audience over Parler that FBI agents came to his home and told him not to go, "Just had
a knock at the door. I won't be going to DC. Whatever operation they've got running to fuck
with patriots, it's massive and they aren't playing around."
While there's no evidence that the group that overpowered the police and entered the
Capitol was inorganic, open questions remain over the role informants and undercover agents may
have played in the deaths that occurred.
It appears to me that Schumer has in mind to try former President Trump in the senate with
John Roberts presiding. IMO this is unconstitutional. As Alan Dershowitz said on the TeeVee
today, the prospect of such a procedure should be horrifying to all. Why? If the congress can
try a private citizen and bar him/her from holding federal office, then whichever party
controls the congress can simply bar significant opposition figures from office by re-defining
the meaning of statutes, imputing motive where there is none and through guilt by association.
This all begins to smell like Stalin's show trials in the 30s in which he killed off his Old
Bolshevik comrades and the leadership of the Red Army. Trump will always remain vulnerable to
the civil courts. The Dems fear that Florida or federal courts in Florida will not extradite
him? They should live with that in the interest of maintaining the Union.
We now have most of downtown Washington, DC transformed into a Green Zone on the Baghdad
model. 25,000 federalized National Guard troops plus various kinds of cops occupy that zone.
25,000? How about 1,000? How about 2.000? What do they expect, an attack on the Biden
inauguration platform from the other end of the Mall? The bridges from Virginia are closed by
order of his majesty Ralph Northam. We live here under Ralph's imperial decrees in a vast
outdoor prison. The ability of the imperial authorities to wall us up, each in our own crummy
little domain bodes ill for the future.
Not for the first time am I disgusted by the susceptibility of those I thought my countrymen
to waves of hysteria. German and then Communist spying in WW1, Prohibition, internment of
Japanese descended citizens of the US in WW2, McCarthyism, the 2K fantasy in which people
waited for the end of civilized life, 9/11, after which the whole country went into a profound
funk and stumbled about terrified of the NEXT ATTACK. And now, we have the Left's desire to
destroy opposition, the opposition of 75 million citizens and to do it through mass
mobilization of political hysteria.
This will never be the same country again. We have lost the talent needed to maintain a
federal republic. pl
I think we always knew they'd persecute Trump and his family until his last breath; even
after that.
However, the move to declare members of congress who questioned the vote "seditious" is
somehow, to my mind, much worse. Yes, all opposition will be purged.
The Left is pushing too far too fast. They've lost all perspective. IMO, this won't end
well for any of us; including them.
I've lost about a third of my friends on social media, especially FB. These are solid
people, ad agency execs, successful writers, business analysts, small business owners,
retired cops and military. They left for uncensored [at least for now] forums - or are now
entirely off all social media. They aren't going to stop communicating with one another. We
talk on the phone or by email. They aren't going to stop feeling the way they do about
current events. They're just going underground, where their resentment and sense of
disenfranchisement smolders.
My last hope is that the military/NG is, on the whole, in line with our outlook as
opposed to the Lefties. The Lefties seem to exist secure in the concept that the military
consists of stupid robots that will mindlessly do the bidding of sleaze bags like Pelosi,
Schumer, AOC. IMO, keep pushing and maybe find out how misplaced that concept is. Sad it
may come to that.
Show trials, purges & political denunciations - the Soviet parallels are increasing
daily. Are Army political commissars next?
"The D.C. National Guard is also providing additional training to service members as they
arrive in D.C. that if they see or hear something that is not appropriate, they should
report it to their chain of command."
Artemesia - "The roughly 25,000 National Guardsmen deployed to the U.S. capital to
ensure President-elect Joe Biden is able to be sworn in peacefully went through an
additional background check to weed out any whiff of domestic extremism."
Wouldn't it be less manpower intensive to go through their ballot papers and weed out
any Guardsmen who voted for Trump? You'd have to offer re-education for the rejects and
something a little more positive for the hard cases but presumably that'll be done anyway.
Can't leave domestic extremists running loose in the community without taking precautions,
especially those who've had military training.
It would though be inadvisable to extend this procedure to the American Trump voting
population as a whole. Seventy plus million is a lot of people to re-educate and in any
case they don't seem to be going the right way about it.
The Dems ought to take a leaf out of the experts' book. The writer Sebastian Haffner,
who started off as a lawyer, was one of those who got re-educated in the '30s. The way he
tells it you had to do that if you wanted to enter the professions.
So he went along to the indoctrination course. Didn't have much choice if he wanted to
be a lawyer. The re-education wasn't coercive at all. The instructors jollied them all
along saying "We know all this indoctrination stuff is nonsense but it'll ease off soon.
Just go along with it to keep them happy."
So he did. As did his mates. The re-education obviously didn't take with Haffner. He was
one of the hard cases. But it took with most of his mates and that seeming acquiescence was
enough to keep the Nazis in power without too much domestic opposition.
That was proper soft totalitarianism on the way to becoming hard. The more optimistic
Dems seem to want to jump that stage and go all out from the start. Can't see it
working.
I bet a lot of people are thinking that dispatching 25,000 troops to DC is the only way
a decent-sized crowd will be in attendance for Beijing Biden's inauguration. I'll never be
convinced that all of this faux outrage and hysteria, like the COVID fearmongering during
the campaign season, isn't a way to mask Biden's lack of appeal.
I recall several pre-election pollster warnings that low enthusiasm was going to be a
problem for the Democrats. Yet miraculously, we're being coerced and re-educated to believe
the senile, do-nothing grifter actually won the all-time highest vote count. Give me a
break.
As far as show trials go, Congress has succeeded in cheapening the value of impeachment
as to render it nearly unexceptional, a mere asterisk. Unfortunately for them not everyone
is as gullible, as willingly credulous, as their faithful partisans.
"We have lost the talent needed to maintain a federal republic."
Col. Lang,
I agree
These people are incredibly short sighted.
That show trial would be a stupid and self defeating stunt, which would increase the
divisions in this country, solidify the resistance to their rule, and certainly make a
martyr out of Trump.
At no point would it strengthen their hold on power, it only weakens it. And that should
be obvious to them, but it isn't, I don't understand why.
It feels like they can't see passed tomorrow, which is what truly worries me. They
continue to destroy the traditions, which protected us, and institutions which sustained
us. If anything, they're moving faster and faster.
"... Since you like Hitler analogies so much, dear Steven, why don't you contemplate the 'reactionary' aspect of those Germans who resisted, in the 1930s, the 'progress' of the National-Socialist movement. ..."
"... 'Reactionary' simply means 'opposing the change', and the changes instituted by global finance, aided by their faithful servants, your liberal comrades, -- those changes should be opposed by all decent citizens. ..."
Since you like Hitler analogies so much, dear Steven, why don't you contemplate the
'reactionary' aspect of those Germans who resisted, in the 1930s, the 'progress' of the
National-Socialist movement.
'Reactionary' simply means 'opposing the change', and the changes instituted by global
finance, aided by their faithful servants, your liberal comrades, -- those changes should be
opposed by all decent citizens.
And they are opposed by all decent citizens, and especially by the American working
class, which is why your liberal comrades have to resort to fascist methods: goebbelsian
propaganda, censorship, blacklisting, police repression.
... the US citizens themselves have called into question their country's conformity with the
main criterion of democracy – the ability of the state to ensure fair and transparent
expression of the people's will in general.
This is an urgent issue the United States has to deal with. The nation is divided, the fault
line running between people of different value orientations, which reflect on the electoral
choice between Republicans and Democrats. There is a clear "value divide" between conservative
Americans and those who promote change in traditionalist attitudes, between "law-abiding"
Americans and those who support active street protest, between those employed in high-tech
industry and those left out of the technological revolution. Besides, the election race laid
bare the tensions between the federal government and state and local governments. Accusations
against the federal government of exceeding its authority in using force to suppress riots have
exposed cracks in American federalism, which the central government (regardless of party
affiliation) prefers to conceal as far as possible.
There have also been large-scale violations of the election law. The United States still has
no standard procedures for voter registration, voter identification, ballot issuance and
submission. According to the nonprofit organization Judicial Watch, by September 2020, 29
out of 37 states had 1.8 million more registered voters than actual eligible voting-age
citizens. This is largely due to the fact that there is no such concept as a domestic
passport or some kind of residence registration in the US, so when shifting their place of
residence, people often fail to remove themselves from the voter list. In addition, there were
occasions of people who had long since died having voted for one of the candidates. However,
courts found no evidence that such cases had been widespread – they were often down to
the fact that other family members have similar names, which led to errors in the voter
records. Statistics show that there were 153 million registered voters in the US in 2018,
with more than 20 million entries in the voter rolls being out of date. According to the
California Globe, an NGO, there were nearly half a million such entries in California alone in
2020. In this context, a large-scale campaign was launched urging voters to update their data
in the voter lists.
The most acute situation arose as a result of the mass postal voting, which brought Joe
Biden a reported majority during the counting of ballots. It is not even that Democrats created
a controversial opportunity to gain votes from a passive part of their electorate, using the
pandemic as an excuse. They encouraged a more active use of the mail-in voting procedure, which
had been widely used only in some states during previous campaigns. According to Donald Trump,
this paved the way to uncontrolled machinations.
Thus, on the eve of voting day, the Democratic Party allegedly attempted to change the
procedure for counting postal ballots in the states of Wisconsin, Indiana, North Carolina,
Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Iowa and Alabama in order to considerably lengthen the
period of their acceptance. This made it possible to relax the monitoring requirements for
vote-counting. Consequently, once the voting was over, the Republicans almost immediately
announced that they were filing lawsuits in connection with violations registered in 40
states.
Lawyers representing the Republicans found it unsound that so many states had continued
to count the votes for several days after voting day. They had some serious questions as to the
legitimacy of accepting the late ballots. Nevertheless, courts rejected most of the filed
lawsuits even in Republican states.
All of this is hardly consistent with those norms of democracy that Washington arrogantly
imposes on other countries. For instance, US officials in the OSCE constantly point to the need
for the OSCE participating states to comply with the recommendations by the OSCE Office for
Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) drawn up based on the results of its election
observation activities. In the meantime, the US itself fails to act on the relevant
recommendations, blatantly violating the provisions of para. 8 of the 1990 Document of the
Copenhagen Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the CSCE and para. 25 of the
1999 Charter for European Security stipulating the obligation to invite observers for
monitoring national elections.
Since 2002, the ODIHR election observation missions in the US have recommended in their
final reports that international observers be provided with access to all states at the federal
level. However, that is not what we see in reality. Besides, the archaic US electoral system is
such that the US federal government has no powers to establish procedures even for federal
elections as this is the prerogative of the states. Just as when America was a farmers'
republic with a population of 3.5 million, the president is still elected by the states, which
inform the Congress of their decisions through the electoral college.
During the popular vote in 2016, the ODIHR did not have access to polling stations in 17
states. The international observers, who showed legitimate interest in the elections on the
voting day, faced threats of arrest and indictment. In the 2020 popular vote, the number of
"inhospitable" states reached 18. Only five states and the District of Columbia have legal
provisions in place ensuring international election observation. In all other states, it
remains at the discretion of the local authorities and is quite unpopular.
The lengthy disputes over the election results in courts (and, at the end of the day,
electing a new president there) is yet another fact demonstrating how inefficient and outdated
this voting system is. In the 2000 campaign, the votes cast for George W. Bush and his
Democratic opponent, Al Gore, in Florida were recounted multiple times. It was the Supreme
Court that had the last word, ruling that the vote recounting should stop, which meant the
victory of George W. Bush – even though many Americans still doubt the validity of that
decision. But at the time, such a timely consensus between the Republicans and the Democrats
was exactly what was needed to quickly stabilize the situation.
The enormous costs associated with such a voting system have by now practically erased
the word "consensus" from the vocabulary of the American political elite. Just recently, no
one could imagine – not even in their worst nightmares – that all these partisan
differences would lead to the storming of the Capitol, whose first foundation stone was laid by
the first US president, George Washington. The attack carried out by pro-Trump protesters while
the Congress was counting votes not only appalled national governments all over the world but
provoked bloodshed in the country, which was only recently seen by many as the gold standard of
democracy. It was hard to believe that the events resembling so much Ukraine's Maidan and other
color revolutions that unfolded in recent years across a wide range of countries, including
those in the post-Soviet space, were broadcasted live from the United States all over the
world.
The techniques previously used by Washington for democratization of other countries
backfired. The cold civil war that had been raging in the US for a few months reached its
climax. And while the world is condemning the attack on the Capitol, anxiously waiting for what
is to come next, it is as yet unclear how the Republicans and the Democrats are supposed to
find common ground. The social polarization keeps growing. The long-forgotten spirit of
McCarthyism is again felt in the air. And there is no one who could answer the question:
are there a person and a timeless value that could unite the nation. The situation that has
been brought about by a chain of events predetermined by the archaic voting system can lead to
new waves of violence and unrest. On the other hand, the American political system has proved
its flexibility over the course of centuries. I am sure this time it will cope, too.
There is one more critical issue which, in the context of the outdated American electoral
system, has moved extremely high up the agenda. I am talking about the unprecedented role in
public politics of social networks and new media, and, accordingly, of private IT companies
that own those platforms. Conventional American media, whose activities are regulated by laws
and fall within the First Amendment, have traditionally – and always officially –
taken the side of a certain candidate and yet deemed it necessary to give coverage to
statements made by the opponent during election and post-election campaigns. The social
media, however, are beyond any special regulations and work on the basis of user agreements.
And it was them that unleashed the media war without rules! And that war is waged against one
single person.
During the vote counting, Trump's posts on Twitter, where he has over 85 million followers,
were flagged as potentially misleading and later even hidden. The events in the Capitol
resulted in the unprecedented and permanent suspension of Trump's accounts on all social media
– where he has a total of about 200 million followers. Noteworthy is that the tone of the
posts that provoked the suspension of Trump's accounts was not much different from his
narrative of the preceding weeks. Next, they blocked tens of thousands of supporters of the
incumbent president across all kinds of platforms which used to be viewed as forums for a
full-fledged discussion.
For America, just as for the rest of the world, this level of corporate censorship is a
truly extraordinary phenomenon. A question arises: who are those supreme judges that decided
that they, of their own volition and based on their own rules – but, in fact, guided by
their political preferences, can deprive the country's president of the opportunity to
communicate with an audience of many millions? Whether Trump is good or bad, he is his
country's national, and, furthermore, an official who enjoys the trust of nearly half of
Americans. Thus, it turns out that several technological corporations located in California got
an appetite for power and thought it possible to juggle with news and facts to suit their own
political preferences. This is but a blatant censorship!
Dictating their own terms, they have sought to substitute for state institutions,
encroaching on their mandates, aggressively imposing their views on a great number of people,
leaving them no other choice; while the 75 million of Trump's voters and hundreds of millions
of his subscribers were left out of their "choice." These were simply labeled as insecure.
Isn't it, indeed, a spectre of cyber totalitarianism that is gradually overwhelming society,
taking away from it (and potentially the entire world) the opportunity to see the reality for
what it is? But even if Donald Trump leaves politics for good and the tech giants wipe out his
digital footprint, the minds will remain hugely polarized. This is yet another problem stemming
from the US's outdated voting system, and it will push governments of different countries into
action to prevent the same scenario in their own states.
Given the special place of the US in the architecture of international relations, all this
makes us try and guess the impact of the elections on the "classical" world politics as well as
economy. It is crystal clear that the elections influence direct trends in global development.
Everything else, with certain reservations, can be regarded as an internal affair of the US
itself. Yet outward effects are our common issue. Let me remind you that George W. Bush's
victory back in 2000 caused significant, though short-term, volatility on stock markets. It is
equally possible after the current shock, which of course provides considerable grounds for
concern. But the long-term stability of the US dollar will be largely determined by the
resilience of institutions for the protection of property rights, the demand for American goods
and services in the global market, as well as the predictability and independence of the
Federal Reserve System (FRS), which underpins the confidence in the US dollar. US dollar
volatility will abruptly increase only if US manufacturers lose a considerable share of the
world market or investors doubt the existing safeguards for the protection of assets, the
relevance and soundness of the FRS's long-term policy. Since this is impossible in the near
future, it seems of much more interest to us what Joe Biden's economic policy will look like.
And this is often shaped based on the thesis "just not the way Trump would have it." It's some
sort of a tradition: the same way, the 45th president without hesitation reversed the 44th
President Barack Obama's directives on all tracks.
It is obvious that the development of a national legal and political system is the sovereign
choice of a state itself, though many countries (and first of all the US) are seeking to impose
their model of development on the world as the most effective. Certainly, there is no legal and
political system that can be called the monument of "classical" democracy. It is constantly
developing and improving. The question is, how relevant and timely the models that are offered
as a replacement for those that have lost their progressive potential are. And here what we
need is a combination of sound conservatism and well-timed new laws. Both artificial
preservation of and constant experimentation with political and legal realities pose a danger.
The post-Soviet nations have the examples of both, state regimes sometimes transiting from the
presidential system to parliamentary and back once every two or three years.
Governments in many countries are posing questions about the policy continuity of such an
important actor in world affairs as the US. The 2016 elections shattered the century-long
tradition of continuity of the administrations, particularly in foreign policy issues. This
time, again, the US' stance on a range of key issues depends on the election results. Where
shall we witness a reverse in policy, a getting-around to approaches adopted by Barack Obama
and his predecessors' administrations? Let us take a look at the critical issue of fighting
against the coronavirus. The 2020 candidates' opposing viewpoints regarding the danger of
Covid-19 will lead to an expanded scope and increased stringency of pandemic-related measures
implemented in the US as one of the main short-term effects of the election outcomes. This will
influence the lives and health of Americans as well as the well-being of citizens in
neighboring countries and the US' allies. The polarization among citizens themselves, when you
could tell with great certainty by the presence or absence of a mask which party the voter has
voted for, was grotesque indeed.
The two candidates have adopted very different approaches when addressing relevant economic
issues inside the country, which have a direct influence on the entire world. One should note,
among many other things, that Donald Trump repeatedly commented on the FRS' activities that lay
outside the mandate of the head of state. This caused a certain dollar skepticism in view of a
possible loss by the FRS of its actual independence of the executive power, which triggered a
discussion on the excessive dependence of trade on the US dollar even among the US' allies in
the EU. The reaction of American markets and the actual recognition by Donald Trump of his
defeat was clearly reflected, for example, in the S&P 500. November 2020 turned out the
best November for the main US stock market index. And for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the
month was the best since 1987. The indices were undoubtedly influenced by the positive news
about vaccines against Covid-19, but the growth began immediately after the election results
were announced.
Support for international organizations (WHO, WTO, and others) turned into a bargaining chip
in the presidential election results issue. For decades, the US has increased its weight in
these organizations. And until recently, the attitude toward them has not depended on a certain
administration in the White House. These elections will inevitably lead to the restoration of
the US' full membership and the development of cooperation within international organizations
such as the WHO and the WTO. The outgoing administration has been notorious for its abrupt and
hardly predictable demarches regarding its participation in such associations, which certainly
destabilized their work. Yet the US's financial support is crucial and very significant for
them.
Even more important is the US' participation in international arms agreements, such as the
Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START III)
and the Treaty on Open Skies (OST), as well as in different integration alliances, climate
accords and many others. As in the case of international organizations, the US is trying to
restore to a certain extent its image as a reliable strategic partner. Election pledges to
extend the START III treaty with Russia which Biden called "an anchor of strategic stability
between the United States and Russia," sound very optimistic. The president-elect is an
advocate of arms reduction and has been involved in drafting the INF Treaty since the Soviet
era. One of the election campaign themes was that the US should not withdraw from the Open
Skies Treaty, the World Health Organization and the Paris Climate Agreement – processes
that have been set in motion in recent years.
By the way, the withdrawal of the US from the Paris Agreement and its expected new accession
to it is one of the clearest and most recent examples of political turmoil. There is now a
tectonic change in the very basis of economic activity. A new economic order is taking shape.
States and individual companies are reshaping their models to be carbon neutral, carrying out
rigorous assessment of their business chains starting from suppliers in some countries to
consumers in others. Global investors are rethinking their strategies. International
organizations are shaping new reporting standards that will obviously apply globally. Finally,
most recently the UN Secretary General called on all nations to rethink their tax strategies by
cutting taxes on income while raising taxes on carbon. All of these factors are of global
importance. And the US position, or rather its floundering, can obviously create new global
imbalances. Although everyone will adapt to them after a while, because, as T. Dreiser wrote,
"you have to take things as they are and use them to your best advantage."
Building relations with their allies, especially in NATO, is another basic factor that
directly influences the trajectory of international development. The Biden administration which
is largely made up of the key figures from the Obama administration has already assured its
European partners that full cooperation within the North Atlantic Alliance will be restored.
The US is expected to drop its claims about the disproportionately small contribution of
Europeans to NATO funding and the imbalance in military budgets, which have been repeatedly
voiced by the Trump administration. Time will show to what extent the trust of the US European
allies will be regained. But it is clear that the US foreign policy somersaults over a
relatively short period of time will not go unnoticed.
Even on the issue of interaction with China the candidates have managed to take generally
opposing positions. Although both share the opinion that China is America's main competitor. As
part of the election campaign, Biden's rhetoric toward China was significantly more peaceful in
comparison to Trump's promises and actions. However, trade restrictions imposed by the Trump
administration may remain in place in the new circumstances if the situation requires so. The
experience of the Jackson-Vanik amendment and other sanctions laws shows that such restrictions
can persist for a long time, even after the reason for their imposition has disappeared.
We expect it is highly likely that the United States will consistently pursue an
anti-Russian policy. In recent years, the trajectory of relations between Washington and Moscow
has been steadily going downhill, no matter who was at the helm in the White House. There was
indeed some hope of reversing the negative dynamics during the Trump presidency. After all,
back in 2016, it seemed that relations between the two countries could not be any worse than
those under B. Obama. However, the following years have dispelled this illusion. The Trump
administration consistently strengthened the systemic confrontation between Washington and
Moscow, continued its sanctions policy against our country wishing, inter alia, to force it out
of the energy markets, and reduced our diplomatic contacts to a minimum. And this was done
against the background of D. Trump constantly speaking about the desire to "get along with
Russia." His words did not matter much, however, as numerous restrictive measures in
Congress were supported by both Democrats and Republicans.
Biden has not yet said anything positive about Russia. On the contrary, his rhetoric has
always been openly unfriendly, harsh, even aggressive. He has repeatedly stated that "Russia
is the biggest threat to the United States in terms of undermining our security and
alliances." Nothing more, nothing less. Moreover, the Democrats' team includes politicians
who hold similar views and have no interest whatsoever in improving relations between Moscow
and Washington.
Russia, on the contrary, is ready to work with any US president, ready to restore
cooperation in a wide range of areas. However, we can hardly expect any reciprocal steps from
the new American administration. Our relations are likely to remain extremely cold in the
coming years. And right now we do not expect anything but the continuation of a tough
anti-Russian policy. But perhaps Biden will revisit the issues still on our joint agenda, for
example arms control.
I have listed only a few areas which will obviously be among those deserving special
attention. Most importantly: the unpredictability of further US actions in the international
arena, a kind of toxicity of this country even for its allies and partners is a result of
serious social upheavals that American society faces. This internal and external instability is
largely due to a clumsy, hopelessly outdated voting system that has seen no major changes since
the 18th century up to the present. And the last election turned out to be not a political
competition of ideas that the US had always prided itself on, but rather a confrontation
between two campaigns of hatred.
We do not want the US to have problems. And for practical reasons: such problems create
waves of instability all around that overflow us as well. The problems of the United States can
only be solved by the Americans themselves along with the good governance of the country. One
of the founding fathers of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, rightly noted that "the
whole art of government consists in the art of being honest." Any election is the most
important test of such honesty. Of course, only Americans themselves can decide whether to put
aside their national selfishness and launch the voting system reform, and, consequently, the
reform of political life, or not. So far, there has been no real move toward this. Nor even the
slightest hint of a desire to change anything. And the international community is already
paying too high a price for the US' reluctance to change.
Dmitry Medvedev served as Russia's president from 2008 to 2012 and prime minister from
2012 to 2020. He has been deputy chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation
since January 2020.
apothqowejh 8 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 09:04 AM
An interesting underlying premise of the article is that government is actually about
enacting policy. It appears to me, living in the cheap seats, that the purpose of government,
while ostensibly about policy, is really to rob its subjects blind while concealing the theft
and crushing dissent.
jake234 15 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 02:31 AM
The former president of Russia is able to write an essay. Whether you agree with him or not,
the sentences in this article have weight; and you have to mull what he says over in your
mind. Compare this with the soundbites of US presidents.
Observatory jake234 6 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 11:10 AM
President Medvedev has been and apparently somehow remains an idealist/naive man as confirmed
by the essay above. Just a babe in the woods of politics.
TheFishh jake234 9 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 08:01 AM
The rhetoric of US presidents has deg
Ligov 10 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 07:23 AM
Given that America is the most influential state in the world, that is, it practically
influences everything that happens in the world, then obviously everyone around the world is
not indifferent to what is happening in America, especially in its dominant group, the
aspen's nest. And what happens there, as all honest people in the world, including the
Americans, guess, are clearly dubious things. To stir up this hornet's nest is a noble cause.
And the success of this business will determine the well-being of the whole world. May honest
Americans striving to clean up their homes feel the support of the world.
Hassam275 16 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 01:32 AM
Its been said that American elected officials are like passengers on a train who come and go,
yet the conductor is the non elected establishment politicians loyal to foreign agendas who
are extensions of special interest lobbies. That is why policy never changes, though the
illusion of democracy is maintained. Now that a large number of citizens caught on to this
scheme, the propaganda arm of the establishment, the media, attempts to brand these citizens
racists or traitors in an attempt to use fear and shame as thought control. This only makes
the masses more enraged and the unfortunate ones are the law enforcement officers who are
stuck protecting the establishment. Also unfortunate are the politicians who actually care
about their constituents whose lives are also endangered. So violence isnt the way out. The
deep state must be exposed.
MotorSlug conformista 5 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 12:10 PM
the US has never been a democracy, that's the last thing the rich, white, land and
slave-owning framers wanted. they were scared to death of equality and human rights. France
and Russia today have a better grasp on reality than you do
costelmagik 15 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 02:14 AM
America 2.0, after election and before it is just suggest the fast approaching the end of the
Empire ,a lot worse then before the election considering the division between Americans , the
fraud through the election and the economic and financial collapse which in his last legs.
Jonathan E 9 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 07:41 AM
The American population has an 'uphill battle' to acquire a functional democracy because they
are under the 'heel' of a powerful Plutocracy which has firm control of a powerful Media.
GottaBeMe 6 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 11:19 AM
"According to the nonprofit organization Judicial Watch, by September 2020, 29 out of 37
states had 1.8 million more registered voters than actual eligible voting-age citizens." US
democracy is a sham.
MiloDiddlbomb Andy0 2 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 02:52 PM
Actually I lived just outside NYC during 9/11 I had to go to NYC the week after and what
struck me was the absolute silence. NYC is normally crazy noisy but for a couple months you
didn't even hear a car horn. The actual divide openly happened when Trump looked like he
actually had a shot at winning. And in my opinion it wasn't Trump himself but the fact that
an outsider might get let in. Then the political machine started to create this insanity we
now have. In a way you are right. What Trump brought into the sunlight was the hate middle
America had for 20+ years of war. The people on the coast as a rule have nothing to do with
the military since the draft ended - The majority of military people have been coming from
Middle America. Plus the fact that any of the wars could have been easily won - except where
the future in that? More money is made just dragging them out in stalemate. A lesson learned
in Vietnam where it became obvious the money was in keeping the conflict going. Generals
don't care. Most have never seen one day of combat.
Ibmekon 13 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 04:11 AM
"We do not want the US to have problems." Oh yes we bloody well do ! They will not dismantle
their empire witout the collapse of the dollar. Even today the gravy boat of Democrats are
fighting to keep thousands of their army of occupation in Afghanistan - against the wishes of
their own electorate and President.
Bjarne Örn Hansen 17 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 12:33 AM
First of all, americans aren't too smart. That the US had a backup system to put a finger on
the election scale, should have been obvious to anyone with an iq above 0. No power, let's
the mob decide it's future. It will always have an ace up its sleeve ... but using this
system, should be done in emergency only and should one time deal, done at the peril of the
politicians using it. What americans do from here, should be restore the union and remove all
politicians and parties that were involved ...
9/11 Truther Bjarne Örn Hansen 15 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 02:32 AM
The majority of American schools, colleges, and mainstream media are specifically designed to
result in people who "aren't too smart". The " thumb on the election scale" is phase #2.
Gio Con 1 hour ago 16 Jan, 2021 04:36 PM
So basically, the US needs to update its method of screwing the people.
Sites and people who posted Hugo Chavez nonsense should pay the price. Which is good.
Also capabilities to produce weighted votes does not mean that it was deployed. But if it is
present it serve as a Damocles sword over the integtiry of election, as you never can be sure
whther is was somehow activated or not. And so far there is no convincing facts that it was
deployed. Looks like most common method was staffing of mail-in ballots by corrupt staff.
But Dominion tabulators do create concentration of ballots in one place, which automatically,
completely by the fact of creating the "critical mass" of ballots in one place facilitates larger
scale fraud . From this point of view they can be regarded as catalysts. That' is
undisputable.
The way sysadmin roles were assigned by Dominion, how such activity is controlled, and what
people are selected is open to review as those people automatically become powerful players in
the election process and are outside usual safeguards, which were developed for traditional
systems. In no way they can be controlled by election observers. That's the fact.
In case the machines were internet connected all Dominion employees with access to them also
become election players. As well as all interested intelligence agencies.
Conservative
blog American Thinker has issued an apology in response to Dominion Voting Systems' lawyers
accusing them and others of defamation for pushing claims their technology helped rig the
presidential election.
In a Friday statement written by editor
and publisher Thomas Lifson, American Thinker admitted their stories on conspiracy theories
surrounding Dominion machines being rigged in Joe Biden's favor were based on "discredited
sources who have peddled debunked theories about Dominion's supposed ties to Venezuela, fraud
on Dominion's machines that resulted in massive vote switching or weighted votes, and other
claims falsely stating that there is credible evidence that Dominion acted
fraudulently."
Lifson called the statements "completely false" and added that "Industry experts
and public officials alike have confirmed that Dominion conducted itself
appropriately."
The company went on to apologize for any "harm" their stories caused the company
and their employees.
"We also apologize to our readers for abandoning 9 journalistic principles and
misrepresenting Dominion's track record and its limited role in tabulating votes for the
November 2020 election. We regret this grave error," they added.
The apology also names Andrea Widburg, R.D. Wedge, Brian Tomlinson, and Peggy Ryan as
specific contributors who have covered conspiracy theories surrounding Dominion.
On the same day as the apology, the conservative blog also shut down its comment section,
but provided no solid reason as to why.
Pieces published by American Thinker presented theories that the machines deleted
pro-Trump votes and that it was tied to outside foreign and political groups, common theories
that have been pushed by President Trump, his legal team, and supporters.
Dominion has taken more aggressive action recently against accusations against them, even
suing Trump lawyer Sidney Powell for defamation to the tune of $1.3 billion.
The company's legal team has also targeted other right-wing media, warning Fox News
recently that action is "imminent" in response to numerous statements made on the
network by anchors and guests like Trump counsel Rudy Giuliani. They also sent letters to
individual anchors for Fox and Newsmax demanding they "cease and desist" making
defamatory statements about the company and its alleged role in rigging the presidential
election, an act they say has no proof to back it up.
In response to the threatened litigation, Fox News aired a segment multiple times shooting
down voter fraud claims linked to Dominion.
Newsmax, meanwhile, released a statement clarifying many conspiracy theories linked to
Dominion and Smartmatic, another vote counting system threatening legal action.
How one defines systemic fraud? Actually the role on Internet giants in 2020 election
represent systemic fraud. Also is not "simple fraud" not enough for DOJ to take a look. Or
"simple, one time fraud" now is welcomed by DOJ?
Main-in ballot fraud looks systemic to me with documented well coordinated efforts to weaken
protections on the part of DNC lawyers.
The situation with the observers suppression is a real scandal painting the USA as a banana
republic.
US
Attorney General Bill Barr told AP that the Department of Justice has not seen evidence of
fraud on a scale that could change the outcome of the election, but President Donald Trump's
attorneys claims it never even looked.
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different
outcome in the election," the agency quoted Barr as saying on Tuesday. He said both
federal prosecutors and the FBI have been looking into specific complaints but found nothing
that would change the media consensus that Democrat Joe Biden defeated Trump earlier this
month.
Trump's lawyers, led by Rudy Giuliani, have launched a series of legal challenges in
places like Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia, challenging large amounts of
mail-in ballots they say weren't properly verified. They've also claimed votes were cast by
dead people, observers weren't allowed to observe the counts, and other
irregularities.
Barr said there was only one claim of systemic fraud – that voting machines were
programmed to shift millions of votes – "and the DHS and DOJ have looked into that,
and so far, we haven't seen anything to substantiate that." While he did not name any
names, this was a claim made by Sidney Powell, an attorney not directly affiliated with the
president's legal team, in her lawsuit in Georgia.
"With all due respect to the attorney general, there hasn't been any semblance of a
Department of Justice investigation," Giuliani responded on Tuesday, accusing the DOJ of not
interviewing any of their sworn witnesses and refusing to audit voting machines or subpoena
officials.
Barr did tell AP that most of the complaints about the election ought to be handled by
state and local officials conducting audits, rather than making a federal case out of
everything.
"There's a growing tendency to use the criminal justice system as sort of a default
fix-all, and people don't like something they want the Department of Justice to come in and
'investigate,'" he said.
Within days of the election, Barr had authorized the DOJ to follow up on "substantial
allegations" of irregularities with the vote, arguing it was "imperative that the
American people can trust that our elections were conducted in such a way that the outcomes
accurately reflect the will of the voters."
Democrats, US mainstream media and social media platforms have been united in insisting
there had been no "widespread" voter or election fraud, labeling all of Trump's claims
to the contrary as "baseless" or "disputed."
In the reality the USA is not falling apart. It is neoliberalism that is falling apart and
this is just how common people feel during the collapse of neliberalism.
"79% of Americans think the US is falling apart" those not accounted for are possibly
homeless or illiterate and don't have the opportunity of putting their view forward.
RTaccount 1 day ago 15 Jan, 2021 02:22 PM
There will be no peace, no unity, and no prosperity. And there shouldn't be.
TheFishh RTaccount 1 day ago 15 Jan, 2021 03:38 PM
The US regimes past and present have worn out their bag of tricks. A magician is a con-man.
And the only way they can entertain and spellbind the crowd with their routines is if
everyone just ignores the sleight of hand. But people are starting to call the US out for the
tricks it is pulling, and that's where the magician's career ends.
SJMan333 23 hours ago 16 Jan, 2021 01:02 AM
America as a whole is now reaping the fruits of its decades of exceptionalism complex.
Through its propaganda machine, Americans as individuals and collectively as a society, have
been brainwashed into believing that laws, rules and basic human decency do not apply to
themselves. These are only sweetened poisons for them to shove down the throats of other
lesser countries, especially those in Africa, Latin America, Middle East and Asia ((bluntly
put, non-white countries)) when it suited America's global resource thievery and daylight
wealth grabbing. Habitualized into bullying every other countries with no resistance,
Americans are now showing their ugly faces on each other. The same exceptionalism delusion
"the laws apply to you, not me'' is driving every American (except the colored Americans
probably) to blame all the ills of the country on everyone else except himself. Nancy Pelosi
advocated total lock-down but treated herself to a total grooming in a hair saloon is just
one example. For the sins it has committed over the decades, I guess the time is right for
USA to have a dose of its own medicine. Except in this case, America never thought it
necessary to develop an antidote.
"These leaders are trusted at home and respected around the world, and their nominations
signal that America is back and ready to lead the world, not retreat from it,"
Biden said on Saturday in a statement announcing his picks to fill top positions under his
nominee for secretary of state, Anthony Blinken.
Like Blinken, the five latest State Department picks are veterans of the Obama-Biden
administration. Nuland , a
neoconservative who was named undersecretary for political affairs, goes all the way back to
former President Ronald Reagan's administration and was a foreign policy adviser to former Vice
President Dick Cheney.
Other new re-hires include: Wendy Sherman, deputy secretary of state, who led the
Obama-Biden administration's negotiating team on peace talks with Iran; Brian McKeon, deputy
secretary for management and resources, who was a national security adviser to then-Vice
President Biden; Bonnie Jenkins, undersecretary for arms control and international security,
who previously coordinated nonproliferation programs; and Uzra Zeha, undersecretary for
civilian security, who formerly was charge d'affaires at the US Embassy in Paris.
After four years of President Donald Trump's 'America First' policy, including efforts to
wind down foreign interventions and broker peace deals, Biden's declaration of "America is
back" portends a sharp contrast in foreign policy. He said his latest nominees will "use
their diplomatic experience and skill to restore America's global and moral
leadership."
Nuland, who studied Russian literature at Brown University, wrote last summer in Foreign
Affairs of how "a confident America should deal
with Russia " with a more "activist" policy, including "speaking directly to
the Russian people about the benefits of working together and the price they have paid for
(President Vladimir) Putin's hard turn away from liberalism." She added, "Washington and
its allies have forgotten the statecraft that won the Cold War and continued to yield results
for many years after."
Nuland perhaps was using such "statecraft" when, as assistant secretary of state in
December 2013, she handed out cookies
to protesters at Kiev's Maidan Nezalezhnosti square who were demanding the resignation of
President Viktor Yanukovich. An audiotape leaked in February 2014 showed that
her involvement in the uprising went well beyond cookies, as she spoke with US Ambassador
Geoffrey Pyatt about plotting to replace Yanukovich with Washington's chosen opposition leader,
Arseny Yatseniuk, and about involving the UN to "f**k the EU" by pushing through a
US-preferred Ukraine policy.
Ironically, Nuland's appointment comes just as politicians in Washington fret over this
month's storming of the US Capitol by pro-Trump protesters, which some called a
coup attempt.
"I knew it wasn't a real coup because Victoria Nuland wasn't handing out cookies,"
Cato Institute senior fellow Doug Bandow said of the Capitol assault. "She'll be back
overthrowing governments in the Biden administration, so it remains a valid standard."
In light of Nuland's hawkish history, 25
anti-war groups have jointly called for the Senate to
reject confirmation of her nomination as undersecretary for political affairs.
"Victoria Nuland is returning to the State Department," one commenter wrote on
Twitter. "The United States is returning to the former Soviet republics with great strides.
A fierce struggle with Russia begins."
It's all starting to fall apart for the Demtards and their narrative. Below is a short clip
filmed by the BLM idiot that was just arrested, it shows Jade Sacker from CNN inciting the riot
in the capitol right along with him.
Then we have Steele coming out and directly telling everyone that he wrote the Dossier for
one reason, that was to get the Trump/Russia collusion story going in order to divert attention
away from the Clinton emails. So there you have it, you****ingassholelibtards who spent years
whining about Trump and how he was controlled by Putin, now know the truth of your idiocy and
outright Treason against this country. You people are thebiggestassholesin the world for
pulling this crap on America.
When De-class hits full on this weekend and next week, we are all going to get a taste of
just what these people are all about.
Why the DC and Capitol Police who also 'should have known" since they are the professionals,
were the ones who chose to not add additional forces. False flag operation ?
Trump did not tell the protesters to storm the capitol building but he was stupid for
sending them there. He should have known there were agitators in the crowd. Intelligence
should have informed him, if not, common sense should have told him.
There were lefties in the riot who entered the capitol e3ven though there is no proof they
were a determining factor in the stupidity that followed Trump's speech.
I heard AOC say she was afraid for her life. She had no sympathy for the small business
owner that lost everything when the cities burned, windows broken, stores looted, people
beaten and killed. The Dems supported BLM and antifa riots, in fact, egged them on. Now they
want to crack down on the right because they target the source of power and not the little
guy unprotected by law enforcement. Defund the capitol police.
Optimax:
If there was "intelligence". I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was withheld from
Trump.
The "intelligence" (talk about an oxymoron) agencies have been sabotaging him since before
his election.
As for the cops, the DC Metro police work for a raging Trump-hater and the Capitol Police,
who knows?
My niece worked in the Capital for several years and when I asked her about the Capitol
Police, she laughed:
"They can barely operate the metal detectors."
Will the Senate really take this superfast cooked Impeachment? Impeachment has customarily
been understood to be a process to remove a sitting president, not convict a former one -- or bar
him from federal office, as is proposed by the count of the indictment. Looks like once Trump's
term ends on Jan. 20, Congress loses its constitutional authority to continue impeachment
proceedings against him -- even if the House has already approved articles of impeachment.
Regardless, there's no way the Senate will convict with a 2/3 vote and the dems know it.
The BLM protests, ugly as they were, were not an attempt to destroy the Constitution and
overthrow the government.
I get the different parts of the leftist program confused. I guess we have a James Clapper
"not under this program" situation here. It wasn't BLM it was some other program. hunh. What
was the constitution-overthrow program called again?
Was it the rigged vote-counting? Operation Voteharvest? The activist judges ordering the
permanent administrative state to defy the state legislature's election laws? The Soros DAs
refusing to enforce the law? The Californians pretending to move to Georgia then moving back?
The plans to pack the court and add states that the puppet presidential candidate refused to
discuss? The plan to lock everyone in their homes, shut down small businesses, print money
and distribute it based on skin color? The plan to legalize all the illegals by illegal
executive order? The plan to grab all the guns through some weird scheme of requiring stamps
that nobody issues? Burning the police station to the ground and attempting to burn the
federal courthouse to the ground while talking about Orange Man's "fascist" attempts to stop
that from happening?
Or the black-shirted Marxist roving death squads with bats, bricks, and guns declaring
warlord-ruled "autonomous zones" within major cities, with support from local politicians and
their party organ media?
Which was the plan to destroy the Constitution and overthrow the government?
oh, sorry. I got it all wrong. it was the people who walked through a door held open by
cops saying, "I don't agree with it, but I respect it," stole a podium, and took some selfies
and then left after a couple hours. That was the "destroy the Constitution" plan. Did it
work? How's it going, guys? We're rooting for you. We've come so far but we have such a long
way to go.
In what specific part of the President's speech did he "incite the mob"? By telling them to
go peacefully protest? By telling them to cheer on the Senators and Representatives raising
objections? By telling them to make people proud?
Trump literally gave a speech filled with insane lies about election fraud and told them
to go to the Capitol to stop the steal. His personal lawyer bellowed there will be "trial by
combat". Trump advisor and bedding impresario Mike Lindell talk about civil war. Saying
"peaceful" once isn't a magic spell that absolves one of responsibility. If it was, Michael
Corleone would be as innocent as a babe being baptized.
None of this would have happened without Trump's leadership. Whipping up a mob against
Congress is the only thing he's focused on for an extended period of time in his
presidency
-----
As for the riots this summer, I also believe that any rioters should be removed from the
office of the president of the United States.
Yes, there is. In what specific part of the President's speech did he "incite the mob"? By
telling them to go peacefully protest?
Probably the parts where he told the crowd that they had to "fight like hell," then
the part where he said if they "don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country
anymore" , then saying they had to "stop the steal" and that if they didn't they
would have an "illegitimate president." The latter claim of course being a bald-faced
lie.
But what happened in the capitol last week was no uglier than what has been happening in
this country for years, virtually every time the left gets it protest wheels turning.
Yes it was uglier.
Attacking businesses ≠ attacking police stations ≠ attacking court houses ≠
attacking State Capitols ≠ attacking The Capitol ≠ threatening to lynch
the VP and Members of Congress
If you're going to make a false equivalence like this, why should anyone take you
seriously? Yes, threatening to upend our democracy by advocating the death of our elected
officials is a lot bigger of an issue than a Target in Minneapolis being looted or
burned. It's possible for both things to be bad or unwelcome outcomes, but for one (the Trump
insurrection) to be far, far, far, far worse.
How about burning down entire sections of cities, dragging innocent civilians out of their
cars, rioting, looting, firebombing, raping, murdering....all part and parcel with conduct
we watched go on for months.
Hilariously, Trump pardons war criminals that literally have done all these things, and
you pretend like you have the moral high ground.
But he incited a riot. He deserves to be impeached. He deserves to be barred from running
for office. He deserves to be deplatformed.
The funniest thing about this is that you could ignore the riot and he still
deserves to be impeached . Did you forget when the little impeachable phone call he made
to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger? God knows how many more similar phone calls
he's made over the past four years that no one was smart enough to record and leak.
who went around and raised money to bail out rioters from jail so they could go out and
riot again have been fired
They primary reason to paying for bail is because we have an unequal and unjust cash bail
system that benefits to middle/upper-class and has unequal impact on the poor. Get real.
Funny you leftist didn't mind when left-wing scum occupied the Wisconsin capitol for 40
days in 2011, or attacked and occupied Senate offices during the Kavanaugh hearings, or
breached Capitol security barriers during the "Women's March, etc etc.
Last week I objected during the Joint Session count of electoral votes in order to have a
debate on the issue of election integrity. My objection proceeded according to the letter of
the statute, which specifically permits for objections and debate, and followed the traditions
of Congress. In fact, dozens of Democratic members of Congress have lodged objections in
precisely the same forum over the last three decades. To be specific, Democrats objected after
the elections of 2000, 2004, and 2016–in other words, every time a Republican has won the
White House in the last thirty years. And they were within their rights to do so. The Joint
Session is the forum where concerns about an election can be raised, debated, and ultimately
resolved with a vote.
The difference between those past instances and this year, however, is striking. In the
past, when Democrats objected, they were praised for standing up for democracy. In 2005, when
Democrats objected to counting Ohio's electoral votes, Nancy Pelosi praised the objections,
saying, "This debate is fundamental to our democracy" and "we are witnessing democracy at
work."
This time around, anyone who objected has been called an "insurrectionist." Sadly, much of
the media and many members of the Washington establishment want to deceive Americans into
thinking those who raised concerns incited violence, simply by voicing the concern. That's
false. And the allegation itself is corrosive and dangerous.
Let me say again, as I have said before: the lawless violence at the Capitol last week was
criminal. There can be no quibbling about that. Those who engaged in it should be prosecuted
and punished. Lawless violence undermines the democratic process by which we settle our
disputes and threatens our democratic life. That applies to mobs of any and all political
persuasions. Mob violence is always wrong.But democratic debate is not mob violence. It is in
fact how we avoid that violence.
Our system of government is the envy of the world in part because it contains mechanisms to
give Americans of different views a voice -- without resort to threats or violence or unrest of
any kind. Debate on the floor of Congress, like the debate that is provided for during the
counting of electoral votes, is one of these. It is a forum for registering disagreement,
airing differing views, and resolving these differences peaceably. This is our proud tradition
as Americans.
Many, many citizens in Missouri have deep concerns about election integrity. For months, I
heard from these Missourians -- writing, calling my office, stopping me to talk. They want
Congress to take action to see that our elections at every level are free, fair, and secure.
They have a right to be heard in Congress. And as their representative, it is my duty to speak
on their behalf. That is just what I did last week.
As to my specific objection: I objected with regard to Pennsylvania because the state failed
to follow its own constitution. The Pennsylvania constitution has been interpreted by the
state's courts for over a century to prohibit mail-in voting, except in clearly stated
circumstances. But last year, Pennsylvania politicians adopted universal mail-in voting anyway.
To make matters worse, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court then changed the rules for when mail-in
ballots could be returned. And when Pennsylvania citizens tried to go to court to object, the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court threw out the case on procedural grounds, in violation of its own
precedent. To this day, no court has found the mail-in voting scheme to be constitutional, or
even heard the merits of the case.
I also objected to point out the unprecedented interference of the Big Tech corporations in
this election in favor of the Biden campaign, not just in Pennsylvania but everywhere. Their
interference in our democratic process has only accelerated in recent days.
Some wondered why I stuck with my objection following the violence at the Capitol. The
reason is simple: I will not bow to a lawless mob, or allow criminals to drown out the
legitimate concerns of my constituents.
I am proud to represent you in Congress. Your voice helps make this country and our
democracy strong. These are difficult days for our country. All I can promise you is that I
will do my best, day in and day out, to represent your voice, no matter who criticizes me. And
I will do my utmost to preserve, protect and defend this republic that we call home.
I am strongly against balkanization of the country. The example of the USSR shows where it
leads -- misery of common pople and dramatic drop of the standard of living, while new gand of
ruthless oligarchs emerge from the ruins.
Pushing the Trump-inspired populist movement underground may only cause it to resort to more
drastic measures. As the leftist libertarian reporter Glenn Greenwald observes ,
"these people know they are scorned and looked down upon... and the more you humiliate
and make them feel powerless, the more you take away their ability to organize and express
that rage, it's gonna find an outlet in more destructive ways."
As a former professor at a top-ranking university, I favored a Trump re-election, not
because I support Trump so much as abhor what the opposition represents and is proving itself
to be. In response to the social media threat to expression, I have inaugurated a new group on
Telegram called 'Thought Criminals'. There, fellow 'thought deviationists' like me are able to
express views that are effectively proscribed on mainstream social media platforms. No one
among us advocates violence or the overthrow of the government. None of us is 'racist'. We
advocate only the rights enshrined in the US Constitution.
But some groups, no doubt, are intent on violence. Yet the violent extremists consist mostly
of Antifa and related 'activists', who will unfortunately trick Trump supporters into another
error during the inauguration, like some appeared to do when involved
in the Capitol siege. It's not as if violent extremists among the Trump base were always there,
ready to pounce on any opportunity to express their "racist," "white nationalist"
views.
Rather, as the rising party has already demonstrated, these people stand to lose the most
under a Biden-Harris regime, whose Big Tech and mainstream media allies act as governmental
enforcement apparatuses.
Trump supporters have been hated and demonized simply for wanting to live without being
reprimanded and punished for their whiteness, their middle-Americanness, or their values. They
face an anti-white, anti-native, anti-middle-America extremism that is set to silence and crush
them into submission.
These and others will form a new underground under the prevailing ideological and political
hegemony. This banishment of millions, and not Trump, is why the nation will fall apart, if
indeed it does.
JJ_Rousseau 5 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 02:58 PM
The best thing that could happen is for USA to "balkanize". For the rest of the world, and
for Americans too. The founding fathers intentionally put restraints on the federal
government's power to prevent the situation we now face. Both parties (actually the duopoly)
are guilty of breaching the constitution, on so many levels we have lost count
Ronj14848 JJ_Rousseau 1 hour ago 15 Jan, 2021 07:23 PM
The USA have more American in uniform outside America than civilian Americans inside America.
You bleed yourself dry trying to be the boss of the world.
chert JJ_Rousseau 3 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 04:52 PM
Right, states should have more power than the federal government. Case in point: North Dakota
is trying to pass a law to sue Facebook and Twitter for those who have been censored on those
platforms. But federal law under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act will supersede
because federal law wins.
apothqowejh 4 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 04:17 PM
As an American, I can't say a reckoning hasn't been overdue. The myopia in this country, and
the tolerance for evil, was bound to rebound. From a refusal to honestly look at 9/11, a
refusal to accept responsibility for Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and a host of other
insanely brutal blunders, to an acceptance of such horrors as the USAPatriot Act and the
COVID scam, everyday Americans have obliviously sleepwalked into a totalitarian dystopia.
Tyranny abroad inevitably leads to tyranny at home, and we have well-earned it by refusing to
vote for peace and non-interventionism; for limited government, for responsible spending. Now
our votes no longer matter, and we are caught helpless in the whirlwind of our own
destruction.
newagerage apothqowejh 4 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 04:33 PM
The CIA, NSA, Pentagon... all these corporations lead to disaster as the employees have to
keep causing trouble to justify their jobs and spend, spend like crazy, the Army and
intelligence agencies spending the hard worked money from Silicon Valley and other sectors.
The country just doesn't make sense, first outsource jobs to China and then when they see
that Chinese people are smarter than them outsource those to India? are Indians idiots? I
don't think so... both countries will rule the World by the end of the century. And the most
important of all... where is your public education system? you can live without a proper
health system, China does, but without a decent public education system? most Americans don't
know where Portugal or Belgium is placed, no matter black or white...
ceshawn 6 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 02:31 PM
Trump didn't do this. The irrational reaction to Trump did this. It started with the
now-fully mythological Russia-gate nonsense (that started with an almost ridiculously made up
FISA warrant application). Continued through constant over-the-top challenges by Democrats of
Trump following Obama-era laws (separation of children and adults for illegal border
crossings) and the clear obstruction used by opponents during his entire Presidency. Trump
was a disaster, Biden will be a nightmare (or a complete liar), but the left shouldn't be
complaining when the reaction to their candidate is equally as disturbing as their reaction
to the right (and yes, the circus that was the "raid" at the Capitol is just as bad as the
intel community doing shady things against a sitting President).
Ronj14848 ceshawn 1 hour ago 15 Jan, 2021 07:27 PM
Trump didnt start new wars......but he has created a situation that foriegn wars will spring
from his actions. He has created hate for a country that during the second world war was a
much loved country.
billy brown ceshawn 4 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 03:36 PM
What could the 'rioters' do? We aren't going to let them poison us anymore. This election
will not be stolen and the new patriot act isn't going to get passed quietly. They are going
to have to crush us or allow a partition of the country
ceshawn 5 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 02:36 PM
If I were Russia or China, I would be watching carefully. Biden almost HAS to go after Russia
over the Crimean disaster of Obama and China will be his easy-out enemy if things are
complicated otherwise. North Korea will somehow become a big deal again as well. Let those
missiles fly, because the incoming administration has a proven track record of blowing up
innocent women and children for "funsies" (drone strikes on "suspected" terrorists...oh and
their families) without any form of due process or care for the safety of collateral damage.
Ronj14848 ceshawn 58 minutes ago 15 Jan, 2021 07:36 PM
True...the media support the military industrial complex. Their friends own the miltary
industrial complex . See who they support politically and avoid them like the plague.
Ronnie Spelbos ceshawn 2 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 06:04 PM
if I was Russia or an Eastern European nation I would offer asylum to white heterosexual men
and their families who want to leave the US. Take advantage of the brain capital and work
ethic of this group. The US is no country for white men.
Ohhho 6 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 01:41 PM
The Evil empire felt vulnerable so it lashed out with vengeance! None if it helps to fix the
issues behind the problem so I expect to see more of it in the near future!
TheFishh Ohhho 5 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 03:32 PM
There are literally just a few things the US can do to rebound as a decent country, but the
establishment doesn't want to make those moves. They rather see everything collapse than see
their wealth and power decreased by any amount.
OneHorseGuy 6 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 02:17 PM
"79% of Americans think the US is falling apart" those not accounted for are possibly
homeless or illiterate and don't have the opportunity of putting their view forward.
Ronnie Spelbos OneHorseGuy 2 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 06:02 PM
102% think the US is falling apart - cites Dominion.
newswithoutbord OneHorseGuy 6 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 02:31 PM
Spot on, mate!
RTaccount 6 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 02:22 PM
There will be no peace, no unity, and no prosperity. And there shouldn't be.
TheFishh RTaccount 4 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 03:38 PM
The US regimes past and present have worn out their bag of tricks. A magician is a con-man.
And the only way they can entertain and spellbind the crowd with their routines is if
everyone just ignores the sleight of hand. But people are starting to call the US out for the
tricks it is pulling, and that's where the magician's career ends.
omyomy RTaccount 5 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 02:54 PM
We the sane people know who is picking a fight. No matter what the propaganda outlets decree.
Tor Gjesdal 6 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 02:18 PM
79%,sure? OK. Very soon 85% of Westerners will understand their Countries are heading for
failures. They have been deceived for way too long.
Twenty Tor Gjesdal 5 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 03:23 PM
The alternative to western governments is dictators, one party rule. Yes, most western
governmental concepts are idealistic, but we wouldn't trade for anything else because we know
better.
JIMI JAMES Tor Gjesdal 6 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 02:31 PM
0 covid cases,i dont think so.
soumalinna1 4 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 03:36 PM
Correct. America will never be the same again. Democrats and CNN destroyed a once great
nation.
Ronnie Spelbos soumalinna1 2 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 06:06 PM
The 1965 Immigration Act destroyed the US. A country too diverse with little in common was
always bound the fall apart.
Drayk soumalinna1 3 hours ago 15 Jan, 2021 04:42 PM
While Trump went into the trap himself, by inciting his supporters instead of putting clear
agenda ("demand the establishment of the Congressional commission on election fraud ") and
organizing them, there are already some indirect signs of the false flag. First of all speed with
which the second impeachment articles were drafted and passed.
Today is 11Jan2021. Very few if any Republicans have stated that what happened on 06Jan2021
was a false flag operation. There are many, many videos proving this. Pres Trump did not
encourage violence in anyway shape or form and every communique that proves this was hastily
removed from every platform possible, no one makes the connection to hide the truth. The
false flag event was an excuse for all under pressure to toss the POTUS under the bus...to do
just that. The stolen election that had multistate collusion, multiple foreign states
interfering is far, far more dangerous to the USA than any one protest on 06Jan 2021 ever
could be. Far too many republicans just rolled over in the name of distancing themselves from
him to keep their position without risk. These are the people that like sending others into
unending wars. There are still 8.5 days left. Pres Trump can still declassify a lot of
treason/sedition//and plan old felonious crimes perpetrated by people in (or formerly in)
very, very high places. If he does it quickly enough he could win a second term for the
second time.
So now that BLM and ANTIFA have been implicated with the events of Jan 6th in DC, can we
just say it was a mostly peaceful protest and everyone can go on to the next manufactured
crisis?
...The attack on conservative media and free speech rights is generating much
consternation on the right. Some have speculated that the Capitol take-over was allowed to
happen so that the liberal establishment could crackdown on the right. The failures of the
Capitol police are suspicious. They failed to adequately prepare and failed to call upon
additional resources until too late.
I'm thinking Pelosi & Schumer arranged the invasion. Remember they got themselves
vandalized a few days before? That's why she is prancing around like she ate the canary. They
outfoxed Trump's attempt to put pressure on the counting.
It is fair to observe that if Trump were to be impeached for his real crimes; then his
rivals, the Democrats, would be implicated in the same evils: the savage and intentional
starvation of children in Yemen, or the overt hostility to any socialist society that offers
land reform or social safety nets, or universal healthcare to its citizens. There is
bipartisan support for the brutal and perhaps lethal captivity of Julian Assange.
US military chiefs have put out a letter to condemn the abortive siege of the Capitol. The
authority of the surveillance state and its covert methods continue undiminished. Joe Biden
is putting Victoria Nuland and Samantha Power on the pointy end of regime change for any
little country that might reject the Empire's edicts.
The Democrats aren't stupid. They know that they are provoking more strife. They will
use that to roll out authoritarian measure that will serve the powerful. It is a suppression
strategy that has, at times, worked in other countries.
The forceful suppression works for long -- repeat, for long -- only if the country's
military is supported and supplied by an external force...
Besides this guy, the WaPo Editorial Board has already called for the Senate to accelerate
this impeachment.
It seems this impeachment is more like a desperate attempt by the Legislative to try to
restore the image of American democracy than anything else. I don't think there's a bigger
conspiracy looming behind it:
Dorsey is right: a permaban on Trump is bad for his business, as his followers obviously
will immigrate en masse to another social media platform. It would be an artisanal antitrust
breakup.
I think the USA is long gone its phase of scheming and planning. It is now improvising,
trying to fix problem after problem in their system as they come. Pretty much how the great
empires fall: pressure from the outside, problems from the inside.
The theatre of what's happening in Congress is amusing, even if it seems to be a play by
grade-schoolers instead by Broadway. The Dems seem sure their strategy will cripple the
Repubs, and there's a good chance that could happen. But McConnell controls the Senate until
Jan. 20, and can start the impeachment trial at any time he chooses (he has hinted that it
would be on Jan. 19th). Do the Dems really want to spend their important "first hundred days"
impeaching someone who is no longer there? If it didn't totally shut down decisions on other
issues (cabinet hearings, stimulus checks, healthcare, etc.) it would delay them greatly.
Even though Schumer would then be in control, Senate rules would require rules of order that
could make the trial go on for weeks. I would think the public backlash could be harsh.
Of course there are many Repubs who I assume would like to see the whole thing disappear
quickly, as a prolonged trial will allow the Dems to milk the "domestic terrorists" angle
even more, pointing the finger at those lawmakers who were complicit (real or perceived) in
stoking the uprising. This could play into McConnell's decisions as well.
From my POV, above the "two party illusion", the impeachment could be the best thing to
throw a monkey wrench into whatever upcoming fuckery is in store (as Caitlin J. wrote, "Biden
will have the most diverse, intersectional cabinet of mass murderers ever assembled"). Unlike
Trump's dysfunctional presidency, this team will have the deep ties with neo-liberal (and
neocon) heavy hitters in the MIC, big tech, Wall Street, etc., and may be ready to hit the
ground running. Victoria Nuland's appointment was the icing on the cookies to highlight our
awful state of affairs.
Happened across a great 20-minute YouTube video about the blatant and ongoing US/Western
hypocrisy regarding what happened at the Capitol and what the US inflicts on others.
Those events that the US mediacracy has made so much of were relatively brief and mild
when put into context, but as in Shock Doctrine, the shock is played up and the crisis is
readily and extensively made use of by the establishment.
It's from YouTuber Daniel Dumbrill, a Canadian expat in China who has lived in Hong Kong,
so it relates to what happened in Hong Kong, but the same exercise could probably be done
with other US-sponsored insurrections like Maidan in Kiev, Ukraine, the attempt in Belarus,
and the countless other protests/insurrections inflicted by the US.
I was extremely interested in hearing the General opinions.
You can't blame Antifa, folks. Shouldn't the people who organized this demonstration have
co-ordinated better? Didn't they have the least bit of whisper in their ears that
Antifa/disguised BLM may show up? Do we not know anything about Antifa? Of course we do!!
They're amply funded, organized, and well trained. They have agreements with Soros-elected DAs
for nonprosecution for any charges related to rioting and violence. Why would anyone expect
them NOT to show up?
Too late now. You KNOW these vids will get no airplay outside of independent journalism. No
one in Congress cares.
Btw, Antifa is run by U.S. intelligence. Antifa comes from our own Deep State. I got this
clear impression after reviewing many vids of last Wednesday. So now you REALLY know why
Antifa/BLM have NOT been charged throughout the country. This is a big operation and highly
co-ordinated. They are part and parcel of the Democrat Party = Deep State America Against
Americans
Democrat Party's election slogan = Build Back Better
Deep State America/Democrat Party are the water carriers for Klaus Schwab/Davos crowd.
Btw, any Europeans going to attend Klaus' party on Jan. 25 or so when WEF announces The
Great Reset?
Maybe we should spread the rumor throughout Europe's immigrant communities that Klaus is
planning on showing cartoons of Allah in horrid contexts. Fray
I am not much for conspiracy theories but I am starting to believe this Capital "riot" was a
false flag, it's almost as if it has become the Democrats Riechstag fire. They needed a race to
blame all of the countries problems on, the Dems use whites as that race, next comes the
banning of guns and the purging of academia of differing views. 1 Reply January 14, 2021 11:00
am Obsolete_Man
I'm sure by now you saw the poster which calls for armed protests at all the state capitals
and in DC the 20th. A perfect excuse to justify the military being called up, it will be ANTIFA
and perhaps a few alt right militia members who will show up while the cameras are rolling. If
there are peaceful protesters thinking of going to DC they should not fall for this trap. This
stunt accomplishes several things for the left; proof of an insurrection, the need to get those
pesky guns from supremacists, and of course, Trump is responsible. cromwell
https://www.youtube.com/embed/4bIeKj7fZ8U?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent
3 Reply January 14, 2021 10:51 am Founders1791
The key reson of the protest, which was later hijacked and used against Trump and his supporters, was disputed election. Navaro report
https://navarroreport.com/ suggests that the signs of election fraud committed
are very plausible. As Ron Unz said "Given these facts, anyone who continues to deny that the
election was stolen from Trump is simply being ridiculous."
If those allegations are true, that
makes installation of Biden a coup d'état. The fact that the protest was turned into false
flag used to depose and silence Trump does not change that fact.
Notable quotes:
"... The Hunter Biden corruption scandal seemed about as serious as any in modern presidential election history and Biden's official victory margin was just 0.01%. So if the American voters had been allowed to learn the truth, Trump almost certainly would have won the election, quite possibly in an Electoral College landslide. Given these facts, anyone who continues to deny that the election was stolen from Trump is simply being ridiculous. ..."
"... Heated election campaigns have consequences, and this is especially true when all of America's most powerful corporations and ruling elites unite to essentially steal a reelection ..."
"... this confused tableau of chaos and popular anger, which recalls scenes from the 1968 Chicago Democratic Convention protests, has been portrayed as a "coup attempt" incited by President Trump, and therefore justifying his second impeachment. ..."
"... Expanded mail in voting FRAUD, you mean. Most European countries do not accept voting by mail. Because of fraud issues. ..."
"... This is one more typical coup, CIA installing its chosen presidential puppet ruler. It's a wholly routine occurrence ..."
"... Trump would have won despite the hostility of the media and big tech, and despite electoral corruption in Democrat-controlled big cities, if he had spent the previous 4 years making a good faith effort to implement the policies he ran on in 2016. ..."
"... He ran as a populist, yet ruled as a plutocrat. ..."
"... Candidate Trump promised a non-interventionist foreign policy. President Trump dug us deeper into the Middle East quagmire, intensifying hostilities against Russia, Syria, Yemen and Iran while being cartoonishly subservient to Israel. ..."
"... He ran on an immigration platform written by Jeff Sessions. As president he prioritized the immigration policies of Sheldon Adelson and Jared Kushner – calling for "more immigration than ever before" in his State of the Union address, and lecturing his dumbfounded rally-goers on the need for increased immigration because "my friends in the business world say we need it". ..."
"... Candidate Trump promised to drain the swamp. President Trump pardoned a menagerie of grotesque swamp creatures. ..."
"... Candidate Trump promised to close the carried interest loophole and make Wall Street pay its fair share. President Trump gave massive tax cuts to the very media moguls and tech oligarchs who would subsequently doom his 2020 campaign. ..."
In particular, several of the major swing-states contain large cities -- Detroit, Milwaukee,
Philadelphia, and Atlanta -- that are both totally controlled by the Democratic Party and also
notoriously corrupt, and various eye-witnesses have suggested that the huge anti-Trump margins
they provided may have been heavily "padded" to ensure the candidate's defeat.
Even leaving aside some of these plausible claims, the case for a stolen election seems
almost airtight. I don't know or care anything about Dominion voting machines, whether they are
controlled by Venezuelan Marxists, Chinese Communists, or Martians. But the most blatant
election-theft was accomplished in absolutely plain sight.
Not long before the election, the hard drive of an abandoned laptop owned by Joe Biden's son
Hunter revealed a gigantic international corruption scheme, quite possibility involving the
candidate himself. But the facts of this enormous political scandal were entirely ignored and
boycotted by virtually every mainstream media outlet. And once they story was finally published
in the pages of the New York Post , America's oldest newspaper, all links to the
Post article and its website were suddenly banned by Twitter, Facebook, and other social
media outlets to ensure that the voters remained ignorant until after they had cast their
ballots.
Renowned international journalist Glenn Greenwald was hardly a Trump partisan, but he became
outraged that the editors of the Intercept , the $100 million publication he himself had
co-founded, refused to allow him to cover that massive media scandal, and he
angrily resigned in protest. In effect, America's media and tech giants formed a united
front to steal the election and somehow drag the crippled Biden/Harris ticket across the finish
line.
The Hunter Biden corruption scandal seemed about as serious as any in modern presidential
election history and Biden's official victory margin was just 0.01%. So if the American voters
had been allowed to learn the truth, Trump almost certainly would have won the election, quite
possibly in an Electoral College landslide. Given these facts, anyone who continues to deny
that the election was stolen from Trump is simply being ridiculous.
Heated election campaigns have consequences, and this is especially true when all of America's most powerful corporations
and ruling elites unite to essentially steal a reelection from a populist incumbent, hero-worshiped by many tens of
millions of Americans. And when despite all that blatant unfairness and theft, the final margin of defeat is just one vote in
7,000, an explosion of popular outrage should only be expected.
Solid estimates appear unavailable, but it seems that hundreds of thousands of grass-roots
Trump supporters traveled to our nation's capital to protest against what they regarded as a
stolen election, and then peacefully assembled to listen to their hero's speech.
Afterwards, a tiny sliver of this vast multitude of angry individuals -- perhaps less than
one in a thousand -- barged their way into the strangely-undefended Capitol building of
Congress, took souvenir selfies, livesteamed their antics, and generally played the role of
tourist-protesters while the lawmakers they so despised as corrupt mostly fled or hid.
These Trumpists and some of their colorful costumes brought to mind the radical Yippies of the
late 1960s.
The previous year had seen an unprecedented wave of violent riots, arson, and looting across
some 200 American cities, which our entirely corrupt and dishonest media had generally
characterized as "mostly peaceful protests." In previous years, angry mobs of
organized Democratic activists had repeatedly invaded and occupied the Wisconsin
Legislature , sometimes winning praise from the media. But when unarmed Trump supporters
now did something similar for a few hours in Washington, they were quickly branded "domestic
terrorists" seeking to overthrow our democracy.
A video shows Ashli Babbitt, an unarmed female protester, being shot dead by a security
guard as she tried to climb through a window, an incident not dissimilar to the famous Kent
State shootings of a 1960s campus protest, but hardly treated by the media in a similar
manner.
A couple of other Trump protesters, probably elderly, overweight, or in poor health, died of
strokes or heart-attacks during all the excitement, and one Capitol police officer later died
as well, allegedly struck in the head with a fire-extinguisher although there has been no solid
account of the incident. Yet this confused tableau of chaos and popular anger, which recalls
scenes from the 1968 Chicago Democratic Convention protests, has been portrayed as a "coup
attempt" incited by President Trump, and therefore justifying his second impeachment.
Even more importantly, the incoming Biden/Harris Administration may be considering the most
sweeping domestic crackdown upon traditional American civil liberties since the Patriot Act was
passed in the hurried aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks twenty years ago. This has been
justified by the need to suppress "domestic extremism."
Even without any new governmental legislation, a remarkable Internet crackdown has already
begun. In an absolutely unprecedented development, the sitting president of the United States
-- who had just lost his reelection by 0.01% of the vote -- has been summarily banned by
Twitter, Facebook, and all other major social media outlets, preventing him from communicating
with his followers, and with many of his leading supporters suffering the same fate.
Famed
libertarian Ron Paul criticized Twitter for banning Trump, and
he was immediately locked out of his own Facebook page . Parler, a young but rapidly
growing Twitter competitor, refused to ban Trump, and was immediately driven off the Internet
by a combined attack from Apple, Google, and Amazon, possibly never to return. Our Information
Age has entered a truly Orwellian period.
Another unprecedented aspect of the election is the change of rules implemented due to
COVID. I expected Trump vs. Biden to be the lowest turnout ever. Instead it was the
highest. This must be a consequence of expanded mail in voting.
Expanded mail in voting FRAUD, you mean. Most European countries do not accept voting by
mail. Because of fraud issues. Anyway, probably in the future we will be able to vote with an app, from the safety of our
homes, as we will be locked inside forever due to the "new variations" of Covid.
It will all be safe from fraud, of course, Dorsey and Zuck and Cook and Gates and Brin
guarantee.
Right. This is one more typical coup, CIA installing its chosen presidential puppet ruler.
It's a wholly routine occurrence, although the tactics and staging change a bit:
1. Preemptively quashing the candidacy of Robert Taft
2. Murder of John Kennedy
3. Preemptive murder of candidate Robert Kennedy
4. "Watergate" purge of Richard Nixon
5. Iran-hostage "October surprise" ratfuck of Jimmy Carter
6. Botched murder of Ronald Reagan
7. Suspending the vote count for candidate Al Gore
8. Ballot-stuffing in Ohio to stop John Kerry
9. Multi state ballot-stuffing to purge Donald Trump
By the way, it's a hoot to see the censorship hysteria in CIA's Mockingbird social
networks, while arch-subversive Ron Unz sits here with his infuriating little grin,
permitting the manifest foreign treason of GC34-standard freedom of expression.
Given that all rational human beings understand, as a matter of objective proven fact,
that the election was stolen Where do we go from here?
The slender & extreme, authoritarian, Leftoid margin in the House is certain to be a
circular firing squad of internecine discontent. What little they pass will contain more pork
than an industrial pig farm. It will be a matter of months before the U.S. Economy is tanked
by SJW illegitimacy and misrule.
Much like the GOP beat Gerrymandering, with lead time the GOP will beat Fultoning (named
after the Atlanta County). The GOP is sure to take the House in the 2022 elections.
How many times will Biden & Harris be Impeached, shamed, and forced to undergo public
trial in the Senate? There will have to be multiple trials to establish for the historical
record that Biden/Harris Coup plot was vastly more criminal than Nixon, Clinton, and
Trump.
PEACE
P.S.
Theft By A Thousand Cuts’ Report Conclusive On Election Fraud, Slams Media Cover Up
I read an interesting article by a Sri Lankan who lived through the recent Sri Lanka Civil
War. He made an interesting point that in a civil war, most people just go about their daily
routines, not aware they are in a war. They experience the war as a constant drumbeat of
negative news, with outbreaks of violence that don't directly affect themselves. He said
America is in a civil war, but Americans don't realize it. You know you are in a civil war or
insurrection when the news is constantly negative with frequent reports of violence.
Trump would have won despite the hostility of the media and big tech, and
despite electoral corruption in Democrat-controlled big cities, if he had spent the
previous 4 years making a good faith effort to implement the policies he ran on in 2016.
He ran as a populist, yet ruled as a plutocrat.
Candidate Trump promised a non-interventionist foreign policy. President Trump dug us
deeper into the Middle East quagmire, intensifying hostilities against Russia, Syria, Yemen
and Iran while being cartoonishly subservient to Israel.
The troops didn't come home.
He ran on an immigration platform written by Jeff Sessions. As president he prioritized
the immigration policies of Sheldon Adelson and Jared Kushner – calling for "more
immigration than ever before" in his State of the Union address, and lecturing his
dumbfounded rally-goers on the need for increased immigration because "my friends in the
business world say we need it".
A tight labor market and rising real wages remained in the world of might-have-been.
Candidate Trump promised to drain the swamp. President Trump pardoned a menagerie of
grotesque swamp creatures.
Candidate Trump promised to close the carried interest loophole and make Wall Street pay
its fair share. President Trump gave massive tax cuts to the very media moguls and tech
oligarchs who would subsequently doom his 2020 campaign.
The most passionate supporters of candidate Trump were stabbed in the back by President
Trump – Chris Christie, Jeff Sessions, Steve Bannon, Ann Coulter, the Dissident Right,
etc. in a pattern that has continued to the bitter end with his denunciations of the Capitol
Hill protesters and scapegoating of Rudy Giuliani. At the same time, a whole series of
Never-Trump personalities were promoted within the Trump White House (Rod Rosenstein, Anthony
"the Mooch" Scaramucci, John Bolton, etc.).
Trump's most intelligent and active supporters were utterly demoralized, while his enemies
were given ample opportunity for sabotage and espionage.
Candidate Trump promised law and order. President Trump did absolutely nothing while his
supporters were terrorized by Antifa and BLM.
Thousands of Antifa terrorists and BLM rioters broke federal laws. Why weren't they
arrested, charged, indicted and tried?
President Trump didn't support $2,000 stimulus checks until after the election.
He didn't lift a finger against electoral corruption in Democrat-controlled big cities, or
big tech censorship, until after the election.
Without all these own-goals, the score wouldn't have even been close, and the biased
referees wouldn't have mattered.
Here's the link to the full Navaro report https://navarroreport.com/ This election wasn't "close". It was a blowout for Trump. It was OBVIOUS. It was also EASY to find, if anyone bothered looked just a little bit.
Ron put a "I'm a reasonable man" spin on this (and changed his tune from beginning to end,
glad I read it before firing off an angry response), but I'm not sure there's a lot gained
anymore by trying to reason with thieves and liars. Let's pray this turns around peacefully.
But the facts of this enormous political scandal were entirely ignored and boycotted by
virtually every mainstream media outlet.
Re: Hunter Biden scandal. A survey of Biden's voters – unaware of his son's
corruption – is suggesting that estimated 4.6% would've not voted for Biden, sufficient
for Trump victory.
Mr. Dershowitz, strong defender of constitution and who opposed Trump first impeachment is
suggesting (BBC Hard Talk) that vindictive Dems lead by Pelosi and Schumer violated 5
articles of constitution in one day during the 2nd not even investigated impeachment. Denying
freedom of speech is a violation of constitution.
"... "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself." ..."
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason
from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner
openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling
through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."
Marcus Tullius Cicero
The Transition Integrity Project (TIP) is a shadowy group of government, military and media
elites who have concocted a plan to spread mayhem and disinformation following the November 3
presidential elections. The strategy takes advantage of the presumed delay in determining the
winner of the upcoming election. (due to the deluge of mail-in votes.) The interim period is
expected to intensify partisan warfare creating the perfect environment for disseminating
propaganda and inciting street violence. The leaders of TIP believe that a mass mobilization
will help them to achieve what Russiagate could not, that is, the removal Donald Trump via an
illicit coup conjured up by behind-the-scenes powerbrokers and their Democrat allies. Here's a
little more background from an article by Chris Farrell at the Gatestone Institute:
"In one of the greatest public disinformation campaigns in American history -- the Left
and their NeverTrumper allies (under the nom de guerre: "Transition Integrity Project")
released a 22-page report in August 2020 "war gaming" four election crisis scenarios: .The
outcome of each TIP scenario results in street violence and political impasse.
Is it possible that the leadership of the American Left, along with their NeverTrumper
allies, are busy talking themselves into advocating and promoting street violence as a
response to a presidential election?
The answer is: Yes . expect violence in the aftermath of the election, because now
that is the new 'normal." (" How to Steal an
Election",Gatestone Institute )
Farrell is right. As we can see from the many articles that have recently popped up in the
media, the American people are being prepared for a contested election that will fuel public
anxiety and revolt. This all fits with the overall strategy of the TIP. Selected journalists
will be used to provide bits of information that serve the interests of the group while the
people will be told to expect a long and drawn-out constitutional crisis. Meanwhile, the media,
the Democrat leadership, trusted elites and elements in the Intelligence Community will put
pressure on Trump to step down while firing up their political base to take to the streets.
TIP's 22-page manifesto makes it clear that mass mobilization will be key to any electoral
victory. Here's an excerpt from the text:
"A show of numbers in the streets-and actions in the streets-may be decisive factors in
determining what the public perceives as a just and legitimate outcome." (
"Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election and Transition"The Transition
Integrity Project )
In other words, the authors fully support demonstrations and political upheaval to achieve
their goal of removing Trump. Clearly, this scorched earth approach did not originate with Joe
Biden, but with the cynical and bloodthirsty puppetmasters who operate behind the curtain and
who will do anything to advance their agenda.
This is a full-blown color revolution authored and supported by the same oligarchs and
deep-state honchoes that have opposed Trump from the very beginning. They're not going to back
down or call off the dogs until the job is done and Trump is gone. And when the dust settles,
Trump will likely be charged, tried, sentenced and imprisoned. His fortune will be seized, his
family will be financially ruined, and his closest advisors and allies will be prosecuted on
fabricated charges. There's not going to be a "graceful transition" of power if Trump loses. He
will face the full wrath of the scheming mandarins he has frustrated for the last 4 years.
These are the men who applauded when Saddam and Ghaddafi were savagely butchered. Will Trump
face the same fate as them?
Trump has less than two months to rally his supporters, draw attention to the conspiracy
that has is presently underway, and figure out a way to defend himself against the coup
plotters. If he is unable to derail the impending junta, his goose is cooked.
It's worth noting, that the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) has no legal authority to
meddle in the upcoming election. They were not appointed by any congressional committee nor did
any government entity approve their intrusive activities. This is entirely a "lone wolf"
operation designed to exploit loopholes in campaign laws in order to undermine public
confidence in our elections and to express their unbridled hostility towards Donald Trump. That
said, there analysis will probably influence those who share their views. In the first page of
their "Executive Summary" they say:
"We assess with a high degree of likelihood that November's elections will be marked by a
chaotic legal and political landscape. We also assess that the President Trump is likely
to contest the result by both legal and extra-legal means, in an attempt to hold onto
power. "
(Ibid )
This short statement provides the basic justification for the group's existence. It presents
the participants as impartial observers performing their civic duty by objectively analyzing
exercises (war games?) that indicate that Trump will challenge the election results in a
desperate attempt to hold on to power. Not surprisingly, the group provides no evidence that
the president would react the way they think he would. In fact, their hypothesis seems
extremely far-fetched given the fact that Trump has no militia, no private army, and very few
allies among the political class, the Intelligence Community, the FBI, the military or the deep
state. Who exactly does the group think would help Trump hold on to power: Bill Barr, Larry
Kudlow, Melania??
There is nothing "impartial" about this analysis. It is partisan gibberish aimed at
discrediting Trump while creating a pretext for launching a coup against him. Here is another
sample of TIP's "objective analysis" from page 1 of the manuscript:
"The Transition Integrity Project (TIP) was launched in late 2019 out of concern that the
Trump Administration may seek to manipulate, ignore, undermine or disrupt the 2020
presidential election and transition process. TIP takes no position on how Americans
should cast their votes, or on the likely winner of the upcoming election; either major
party candidate could prevail at the polls in November without resorting to "dirty tricks."
However, the administration of President Donald Trump has steadily undermined core norms
of democracy and the rule of law and embraced numerous corrupt and authoritarian
practices. This presents a profound challenge for those –from either party
–who are committed to ensuring free and fair elections, peaceful transitions of power,
and stable administrative continuity in the United States."
(Ibid )
Got that? In other words (to paraphrase) "Trump is a corrupt dictator who hates democracy
and the rule of law, but that is just our unbiased opinion. Please, don't let that influence
your vote. We just want to make sure the election goes smoothly."
As we noted, the hatred for Trump permeates the entire 22-page document and that, in turn,
undermines the credibility of the author to portray his project as an impartial examination of
potential problems in the upcoming election. There is nothing evenhanded in the approach to
these issues or in the remedies that are recommended. This is a partisan project concocted by
malicious elites who despise Trump and who plan to remove him from office by hook or crook.
So, do we know who the leaders of this (TIP) group are?
Well, we know who their two main spokesmen are: Rosa Brooks– Georgetown law professor
and co-founder of the Transition Integrity Project, and Ret. Col. Lawrence Wilkerson,
Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Government and Public Policy at the College of William &
Mary, and chief of staff to former Secretary of State Colin Powell. According to an article by
Whitney Webb:
" (Rosa) Brooks was an advisor to the Pentagon and the Hillary Clinton-led State
Department during the Obama administration. She was also previously the general counsel to
the President of the Open Society Institute, part of the Open Society Foundations (OSF), a
controversial organization funded by billionaire George Soros.Zoe Hudson, who is
TIP's director, is also a former top figure at OSF, serving as senior policy analyst and
liaison between the foundations and the U.S. government for 11 years .
OSF ties to the TIP are a red flag for a number of reasons, namely due to the fact that
OSF and other Soros-funded organizations played a critical role in fomenting so-called
"color revolutions" to overthrow non-aligned governments, particularly during the Obama
administration. Examples of OSF's ties to these manufactured "revolutions" include Ukraine in
2014 and the "Arab Spring" ..
In addition to her ties to the Obama administration and OSF, Brooks is currently a scholar
at West Point's Modern War Institute, where she focuses on "the relationship between the
military and domestic policing" and also Georgetown's Innovative Policing Program. She is
a currently a key player in the documented OSF-led push to "capitalize" off of legitimate
calls for police reform to justify the creation of a federalized police force under the guise
of defunding and/or eliminating local police departments. Brooks' interest in the
"blurring line" between military and police is notable given her past advocacy of a military
coup to remove Trump from office and the TIP's subsequent conclusion that the military "may"
have to step in if Trump manages to win the 2020 election, per the group's "war games"
described above.
Brooks is also a senior fellow at the think tank New America . New America's
mission statement notes that the organization is focused on "honestly confronting the
challenges caused by rapid technological and social change, and seizing the opportunities
those changes create." It is largely funded by Silicon Valley billionaires, including Bill
Gates (Microsoft), Eric Schmidt (Google), Reid Hoffman (LinkedIn), Jeffrey Skoll and Pierre
Omidyar (eBay) . In addition, it has received millions directly from the U.S. State
Department to research "ranking digital rights." Notably, of these funders, Reid Hoffman was
caught "meddling" in the most recent Democratic primary to undercut Bernie Sanders' candidacy
during the Iowa caucus and while others, such as Eric Schmidt and Pierre Omidyar, are known
for their cozy ties to the Clinton family and even ties to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign."
("
"Bipartisan" Washington Insiders Reveal Their Plan for Chaos if Trump Wins the Election
", Unlimited Hangout )
Is it safe to say that Rosa Brooks is a Soros stooge overseeing a color revolution in the
United States aimed at toppling Trump and replacing him with a dementia-addled, meat-puppet
named Joe Biden?
Political analyst Paul Craig Roberts seems to think so. Here's what he said in a recent post
at his website:
"I have provided evidence that the military/security complex, using the media and the
Democrats, intends to turn the November election into a color revolution The evidence of
a color revolution in the works is abundantly supplied by CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, NPR,
Washington Post and numerous Internet sites funded by the CIA and the foundations and
corporations through which it operates.. All of these media organizations are establishing
the story in the mind of Americans that Trump will not leave office when he loses or steals
the election and must be driven out.
With Antifa and Black Lives Matter now experienced in violent protests, they will be
unleashed anew on American cities when there is news of a Trump election victory. The media
will explain the violence as necessary to free us from a tyrant and egg on the violence, as
will the Democrat Party. The CIA will be certain that the violence is well funded .
What is a reelected President Trump going to do when the Secret Service refuses to repel
Antifa and Black Lives Matter when they breach White House Security?
American Democracy is on the verge of being ended for all times, and the world media
will herald the event as the successful overthrowing of a tyrant." ( "America's
Color Revolution" , Paul Craig Roberts )
Another of the leading spokesmen for TIP is Retired Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson who
made this revealing statement in a recent interview:
"Let me just say some of the things that we're putting out there. Among those things, one
that is very important is the media, particularly the mainstream media. They cannot act as
they usually act with regard to elections. They have to play a coup on election night. They
can't be declaring some state like Pennsylvania for one candidate or the other. When
Pennsylvania probably has thousands upon thousands of votes yet to come in and count. So,
the media has to get its act in order and it has to act very differently than it normally
does."
(NOTE: In other words, Wilkerson does not want the media to follow the normal protocols for
covering an election, but to adjust their reporting to accommodate the aims of the
coup-plotters. Does that sound like someone who is committed to evenhanded coverage of events,
or someone who wants reporters to shape the news to meet the specifications of his own
particular agenda? Here's more from Wilkerson:)
"Second, .we also have learned that poll workers have to be younger. And we've started
a movement all across the country to train young people. And we've had really good luck with
the volunteers to do so , to be poll workers. Because we found out in Wisconsin, for
example, poll workers are mostly over 60. And many of them didn't show up because they were
afraid of COVID-19. And so Wisconsin went from about one 188 polling places, to about 15.
That's disastrous." (" This 'War Game'
Maps out what happens if the President contests the Election" , WBUR )
Why is Wilkerson so encouraged by the young people he's trained to act as poll workers?
Doesn't that sound a bit fishy, especially from a dyed-in-the-wool partisan who's mixed up with
a group whose sole aim is to beat Trump? And why are the authors of the TIP manifesto so eager
to reveal their true intentions. Take a look:
"There will likely not be an "election night" this year; unprecedented numbers of voters
are expected to use mail-in ballots, which will almost certainly delay the certified result
for days or weeks. A delay provides a window for campaigns, the media, and others to cast
doubt on the integrity of the process and for escalating tensions between competing camps. As
a legal matter, a candidate unwilling to concede can contest the election into January.
.."(
Ibid)
So, that's the GamePlan, eh? The coup plotters want a contested election that drags on for
weeks, deepens divisions among the population, undermines confidence in the electoral system,
instigates ferocious street fighting in cities across the country, and gives the Biden camp
time to mobilize its political resources in Congress to mount a Constitutional attack on
Trump.
Can we at least call this treachery by its proper name: Treason– "the crime of
betraying one's country by trying to overthrow the government?"
President Donald J Trump is the medicine the world needed and still needs to expose
corruption in the media, deep state, govermment, and big tech. His USA first policy has
ruffled many feathers here and abroad. Well done sir!
Roggenbrot 9 January, 2021 9 Jan, 2021 10:52 AM
Donald, we alrady miss you! Liberals have no sense of humor.
In their efforts to expunge the Trump movement from memory let alone existence, these
neo-Stalinists are hellbent on nullifying constitutionally guaranteed rights – freedom of
speech, freedom of assembly, and the right to bear arms are under assault.
In place of the Bill of Rights, they would impose a Bill of Don'ts:
Don't say what we don't want to hear.
Don't gather where we don't allow, especially if you are a 'deplorable'.
Don't bother petitioning for grievances, because we don't care. Don't own weapons and don't
defend yourself when you or your property are attacked, even as the police are defunded.
Don't tell us about your right to privacy because our right to surveil you supersedes
it.
Don't tell us you have the right to confront the witnesses aligned against you, or see the
evidence alleged against you, or to present evidence and witnesses in your own defense. That's
your white privilege speaking, and we will not tolerate hate speech.
Don't expect us to be bound by due process or the rule of law. Feelings and desired outcomes
trump facts and rules, both of which are tools of oppression, relics of the fascist
patriarchy.
Don't object, or we will cancel you entirely from these Disunited States of Woketopia.
And first and foremost, don't dare have the temerity to question election results that have
handed us uncontested power.
Only authoritarians sanction this state of affairs. The harm they will do, as they neglect
and inflict further pain on the Republic, will be immeasurable. The nation is failing, not
merely because it is divided, but because a contingent has rejected its foundational
principles. That contingent is now in control.
Strategic-Culture 's Editorial is the best journalistic reporting on the political
split within the Outlaw US Empire I've come across. One short telling excerpt:
"This [blaming all its problems on foreign actors] is the ultimate scapegoating and
destructive denial over endemic U.S. problems. Those problems are topped by the vast
social and economic inequality that has been presaged by decades of neoliberal capitalism
overseen by both Republicans and Democrats. Both parties seem unwilling or incapable of
understanding what needs to be fixed in a fundamentally broken system . The rise of Trump
was something of a diversion from addressing the root problem. And blaming Russia for ongoing
problems is also another futile diversion. This systemic denial of reality by the American
political class is why the U.S. crisis will continue to deteriorate because blaming everyone
else but itself avoids the necessary ways and means to fix it ." [My Emphasis]
At least we're informed as to why there're no attempts to fix the problems as the
Neoliberal Parasites don't want them fixed as they profit greatly as the turmoil
shrouds their activities. The Editors agree with most of us at MoA in their prescription for
a solution:
"The solution will require mass popular mobilization for democratic rights."
But that's just the sort of action that will be resisted by the Neoliberal Parasites. Will
it take a reenactment of the Kent State shootings to galvanize the public? Unfortunately, I
think that's very much the case, and there'll be more than one massacre.
In the old ages in Greece Sparta oppressed the Helots with brute force during more than
400 years. This historical exmaple proves that rule through violent oppression can be quite
stable. I doubt the elites in the USA have enough 'Spartan qualities' to organize the same
violent oppression that long, my point is however that it is a proven possibillity
Re: "The Democrats aren't stupid."? This is one of the least accurate sentences you've
ever written, b!
Choosing to Re-Impeach Trump now proves that the House Democrats are collectively very
stupid. Impeachment, now, is a useless, symbolic exercise, a cathartic feel-good reaction,
which will only have negative political consequences, short & long-term.
Trump has recently re-directed his Mob's anger toward the GOP because it didn't manipulate
November's elections enough to get Trump another 4 years. If the Democrats had any political
brains, they'd just shut up & let Trump destroy the GOP. But instead, they chose to
rescue the GOP by Impeaching Trump.
FOX will fill their screens with pix & vid of Pelosi & Clyburn, to remind The Mob
that Democrats are The Real Enemy. The Mob will howl & cosplay for a while, but by 2022,
Trump will be gone (probably overseas, to avoid arrest and/or taxes), and the Mob will be
voting straight GOP again.
"I don't know or care anything about Dominion voting machines"
Why not? Take a look at Patrick Byrne's summary of evidence for massive election fraud
involving the Dominion machines, on his blog over at DeepCapture.
It will explain how a man who sheltered in his house, did not campaign, drew no more than
six or seven or twenty-five people to his events, got seven million more votes than a man who
drew up to thirty thousand people at his rallies.
...An expert witness in Georgia was able to hack into Dominion in front of the legislative
committee in less than a minute. "We're in." In Dominion, and on the internet.
Dominion machines can do anything! They can assign a weight of 1.5 per single vote to
one candidate, and .75 per vote to the other, and can adjust as necessary. They can assign
batches of "adjudicated" ballots to the candidate of your choice. They can just switch votes
from one candidate to the other in increments of several thousand, let's subtract 29,000
votes from candidate a and add them to b's column. They can allow access by a third party to
the administrator's identity and password so the third party can enter and participate
directly in tabulation of the votes.
And more. If your disfavored candidate is winning by a landslide and your 1.5/.75 ratio
isn't working, you can put in a USB card and adjust accordingly.
If you're desperate you can upload tens of thousands of votes in a single drop which all,
every one, go to your preferred candidate. And you can do it in one hour on a machine which
can only handle a few thousand votes per hour, fed in manually.
For anybody who listened to state hearings in one or more state if is clear that there was widespread fraud. And its importance
is much larger then the question who won the elections
Notable quotes:
"... Multiple methods of attack on the election outcome have been prepared, all methods well planned, tried and perfected in the string of color revolutions around the World. Because those attacking Trump are the same as those who have been doing the "regime changes" in the vulnerable countries over the past 30 years. ..."
"... The playbook/manual is fully symmetrical – it always addresses both possible outcomes – if their side does not manage to steal the election then they incite an insurrection and oust the winner (the Viktor Yanukovych outcome). ..."
"... It is funny how few people appear to understand that Hunter's laptop was not just a suppressed election decider then an important reason for Biden's suitability – the insurance of ensurance, the media ready Kompromat. ..."
"... Finally, it is very important to keep in mind that none of what transpired would have been possible in a healthy country ..."
"... Maybe it was hostility towards Trump's supporters rather than hostility towards Trump. Trump is a reliable pro-immigration ultra-Zionist rabidly pro-LGBT liberal. The views of a large proportion of Trump's supporters are diametrically opposed to Trump's own views, but his supporters aren't smart enough to figure that out. ..."
"... whatever else Trump may be, he's no white nationalist. But again his supporters can't figure stuff like that out. ..."
"... In extreme situations, it's more important to win than to play by the rules. – This is the moral reasoning **** of the fraudsters. The basic equation they applied is so simple that it hurts (and therefore: worked perfectly well – in all of the West) ..."
"... In the Art of Winning Elections it did not take a genius to develop this solution – the lowest number of night-suitcases (filled with ballots) for the highest number of elector votes . ..."
"... In my mind the election was already unfair when you have the entire MSM and the Internet social media companies rooting for one candidate while attacking the other and banning/censoring the voices of his supporters under various pretexts. Both candidates and their supporters, should have been given equal exposure but I don't know how that could be achieved in practice. ..."
"... At a minimum the circumstantial evidence of vote counts being stopped in swing states along with gerrymandered rules was highly suspicious. To claim a mandate on such a close election while losing house seats is absurd but the Republicans bungling the Georgia Senate run off over $2K checks and a sycophantic MSM ensures they will. ..."
"... We are to believe Biden won 507 counties, the least EVER, but won the most votes ever. Trump won 74 million votes, beating Obama's 69 million in 2008, the previous all-time high. Trump won over 2500 counties. ..."
"... Strange that all these presidential elections are always neck and neck. Just because there are two parties does not mean that election after election the vote will boil down to one or two "swing states" and a few thousand votes. Statistically, it just doesn't make sense. ..."
"... This is strong evidence, if not proof, that these elections are scripted from beginning to end ..."
"... The convenient thing about postal votes is that they make it possible to wait until the opponent's votes are all in and counted – then send in just enough postal votes to tip the balance. It's rather like an auction in which one bidder gets only the one bid, and then a rival can offer $1 more. ..."
"... Well said. I'm sure that it's no coincidence that DJT has been involved with televised wrestling over the years. Every great contest requires a memorable "heel" to engage the spectators. In televised snooker in the UK, final matches often are over best of 35 frames. It's unusual for them not to go to the last ball of the final frame. Got to have a little drama. ..."
"... The point is, it is the average intellect, moral and civic weight of the involved constituencies that allows or doesn't allow what shouldn't be allowed in a real democracy. You don't have actual democracy below a lower threshold of intellect and moral and civic worth of all the main involved parties. ..."
"... When you consider Donald Trump's grotesque antics, his entirely unpresidential behavior, evident falsehoods and blatantly corrupt actions – together with the systematic media blitz taking every opportunity to show him in the worst possible light; it is quite astounding that he received as many votes as he did. Far, far more than could be accounted for by simply ascribing them to his 'deplorables'. ..."
"... I think Trump's greatest legacy will be that he ripped away the curtain and the masks fell and we all got to see just how nefarious and rigged the system is, from federal judges to our intelligence community to the FBI/DOJ to Congress to the media ..."
"... Dominion machines can do anything! They can assign a weight of 1.5 per single vote to one candidate, and .75 per vote to the other, and can adjust as necessary. They can assign batches of "adjudicated" ballots to the candidate of your choice. They can just switch votes from one candidate to the other in increments of several thousand, let's subtract 29,000 votes from candidate a and add them to b's column. They can allow access by a third party to the administrator's identity and password so the third party can enter and participate directly in tabulation of the votes. ..."
"... They won the election the old way: they stole it fair and square. ..."
"... If you like your bourgeois job and want to keep it, you will support the narrative. ..."
"... All of the comments on here that analyze DJT's strengths and weaknesses miss the point. I personally think he made some very poor choices; but, to inappropriately paraphrase Carville, it's the fraud, stupid. ..."
"... Occam's Razor should be applied- instead of the nonsense of Chavez having an interest in voting software; voting machines being manipulated; truckloads of paper ballots being moved across state lines- my favorite; etc. ..."
"... t would be very easy to have individuals in a nursing home or even an adult day care center for mentally (dementia) incapacitated adults sign ballots. There are numerous day care centers in New York City, federally funded, where individuals could be coaxed to sign ballots. Just say Trump will close the day care center -- especially where interpreters must be provided because the individuals cannot understand English due to varying stages of mental incapacity. ..."
"... I wonder how many people have watched the twenty hours or so of state legislature hearings related to the election. Can people just not be bothered? These were historic hearings of huge importance, but I assume they didn't get much coverage in the MSM. I think most of them were livestreamed only by small right-wing networks. ..."
"... What were the results of the 2016 election? Billary received 65 million to Trumps 62 million. Gotcha. So we have roughly 127 million who showed up to vote that time. (Wonder how many of those were legit.) So ONLY 4 years later, Joe "I Look Like I'm Drugged" Biden ALLEGEDLY received 80 million and Trump received 74 million. Okay, that is a turnout of 154 million votes. So if I believe in this fairy tale, I was supposed to believe that in ONLY 4 years the vote count increased by an alleged 27 million. Hell, a lot of our most populous states do not even have that many people. ..."
"... Laws don't say a little bit of fraud is OK, because the fraud committed on or by a business didn't cause bankruptcy. Either there was fraud, or there wasn't. ..."
"... That several courts refused to hear cases for lack of standing, is patently ridiculous. If a candidate has no standing, who does? In an election, everybody has standing because they are affected by the result, and by virtue of Citizens United , corporations do as well. ..."
"... Watch this recent interview of Chris Hedges by Jimmy Dore about the root causes of our current woes. Hedges speaks off the cuff in words that sound as polished, powerful and precise as the language in tracts considered to be classics. His Pulitzer clearly was not found in a Cracker Jack box. ..."
Before the election I polled all my friends who would win. The majority of both left and right oriented said that it would
be Trump. I said, yes Trump would win a fair election, but he will lose on who is counting. Multiple methods of attack on
the election outcome have been prepared, all methods well planned, tried and perfected in the string of color revolutions around
the World. Because those attacking Trump are the same as those who have been doing the "regime changes" in the vulnerable countries
over the past 30 years. Trump never had a grain of chance against this mighty machinery. Corrupt local governors and blackmailed
and co-opted all levels of judiciary, targeted lawlessness, threats and examples of violence and future civil war if the other
side wins, censorship, eviction of election observers, night-time suitcases of ballots, one-sided main sewerage media.
All pure déjà vu – this is exactly how the color revolutions work – the art of winning elections. The US bombers arrive
only if the "peaceful transition of power" (aka the stealing of election and post-election) fails. In the color revolution manual,
there is also a chapter on prevention of resistance to the stolen election – thus the msm and congress screeching like castrated
pigs against Trump's imaginary incitement of insurrection (pure psychological projection). I was always sure that Trump is too
much of a cheap demagogue and hot air filled balloon to be able to initiate a real insurrection.
The playbook/manual is fully symmetrical – it always addresses both possible outcomes – if their side does not manage to steal
the election then they incite an insurrection and oust the winner (the Viktor Yanukovych outcome).
... ... ...
In political terms, in the 2016 election a quasi-populist candidate slipped through. This will never happen again because state
laws will be enacted with built-in mail voting and electronic voting machines. Competent or incompetent populists will never get
through again. This will ensure that the choice will always be only between the approved, controllable candidates with plenty
of skeletons in wardrobes and dirty laptops in their closets. It is funny how few people appear to understand that Hunter's laptop
was not just a suppressed election decider then an important reason for Biden's suitability – the insurance of ensurance, the
media ready Kompromat.
Finally, it is very important to keep in mind that none of what transpired would have been possible in a healthy country
: election of Trump without enough Kompromat to have to invent the dumbest Putin's puppet meme and the consequent exposure
of the manipulative Deep State, the sulfuric acid for the brain MSM and the high-techs fakers. These are all the Hegels' seeds
of destruction in action.
One thing to ask is why was this huge effort made to oust Trump?
Maybe it was hostility towards Trump's supporters rather than hostility towards Trump. Trump is a reliable pro-immigration
ultra-Zionist rabidly pro-LGBT liberal. The views of a large proportion of Trump's supporters are diametrically opposed to Trump's
own views, but his supporters aren't smart enough to figure that out.
In extreme situations, it's more important to win than to play by the rules. – This is the moral reasoning **** of the
fraudsters. The basic equation they applied is so simple that it hurts (and therefore: worked perfectly well – in all of the West):
Trump = Hitler.
**** If I might go with Sigmund Freud here, I'd say: – Their rationalizations instead of "their moral reasoning".
I prefer this model, and it's not being discussed: Someone was making BIG money off of those programs and policies leftover
from Obama. Trade with China? Care to mention one BIG company who peddles Chinese wares? Maybe two or three of them, perhaps?
"Follow the money", is what Deep Throat told Woodward. If we do that with our darling Deep State? Just ask yourself, who stood
to benefit from four years of Hillary, pray tell? There's your answer.
The Deep State regime stole this election in exactly the same states where Trump successfully campaigned in 2016 to win against
Clinton. In the Art of Winning Elections it did not take a genius to develop this solution – the lowest number of night-suitcases
(filled with ballots) for the highest number of elector votes .
Thanks for a balanced assessment. In my mind the election was already unfair when you have the entire MSM and the Internet
social media companies rooting for one candidate while attacking the other and banning/censoring the voices of his supporters
under various pretexts. Both candidates and their supporters, should have been given equal exposure but I don't know how that
could be achieved in practice.
Trump was severely hamstrung by the role played by the MSM and the social media. In a real democracy this state of affairs
should not be allowed: where the rich and powerful who control the media have an unequal say and overwhelming influence compared
to the ordinary voters.
Now we have Ruby Freeman, heretofore only on video rolling out suitcases in Fulton County, now on AUDIO discussing her $100
an hour election heist gig and the "Secretary of State" is mentioned at 2:02 by her boss Ralph Jones:
There is a small element of illogic in the numbers part of the argument, namely in using 2 different metrics to make that argument.
(I agree with the corruption part of the argument covered by Glenn Greenwald. It's censorship in action).
As I've done before, I'll reiterate, I'm no fan of Biden or Trump. In fact I'm worried about the war cabinet Biden already
seems to be assembling just as I still worry about the crazed maniac Pompeo for the next few days left in the current administration.
But here's the point and it is a very subtle one: to say it was a tight race and only 1 in 7,000 Americans had to change their
vote is a bit misleading. In the absurd Electoral College, winner take all the state system (which is far more scandalous in my
view), we take one state at a time. If we accept the vote count, Biden won over 7,000,000 more votes more than Trump, a margin
of victory of 4.4%. Not very close.
Therefore, if it were a one person one vote nationwide system, 2.2% would have to change their minds, meaning 1 out of every
45 Americans.
But it's a state by state margin that we're after. Thus more to the point would be to take each individual state and its margin.
So if we took Georgia as one example, the margin of Biden's lead was 11,779 votes out of 4,935,487 votes cast for Biden and Trump
(we disregard all the third party votes in this argument). 5,890 voters would have to "change their minds". Out of the Biden/Trump
overall vote, that's 1 out of 838 Georgian voters.
To apply a different system, overall US vote count, to one state, Georgia, is using which system you prefer to come up with
an illusionary 1 out of 7000 Americans, not applying the same metric down the line. It's a separate state by state system, not
a nationwide vote. You have to stay consistent to be accurate in this method of argumentation.
Very technical, yes. What about mail-in voting? What is the evidence that this is by definition rigged or manipulated? Mailed
ballots have a paper trail like in-person ballots. Presumably someone could steal your ballot from your home and vote on your
behalf, but this can be traced and found out. At least one state, Washington, doesn't even have in-person voting at all. Does
that mean all of their votes are fraudulent?
What about voter suppression? Shouldn't that be factored in? That seems to happen a lot more often in red states than blue
states. What about Trumps attempts to sabotage the US Postal System? Doesn't that bother anybody who supports him? What about
his refusal to commit to the results prior to Election Day? (He did the same in 2016 by the way). This only added to his
opponents concern about his dictatorial tendencies.
Finally, in all the arguments I've seen anywhere, I haven't seen anyone lay out which states use those ridiculous electronic
voting machines which leave no paper trail. That should be the other real scandal and those should be immediately banned in every
state. Get rid of those and the Electoral College and we might have a fair system.
Oh, and get rid of a system that is eternally dominated by 2 parties as well, whether through run off elections or even better,
proportional representation. The latter that would be truly more democratic.
why was this huge effort made to oust Trump? What did they want him to do that he wouldn't do? Was he an impediment to the
increase of control over the average person? Did not want to start up another action against Syria? Would not attack Iran without
having a coalition of NATO countries lined up? Was against total outsourcing to China? Not confrontational enough against Russia?
Perhaps he gave the deplorables dangerous ideas about them having some rights. If that question could be answered then we'd
know what is coming.
He humiliated the upper echelons of society so thoroughly via his 2016 campaign and victory.
@anon Because Trump
inflames white nationalism, which is anathema to the Jews.
There is evidence that Trump himself is a Jew, and a fanatic Zionist at that, so his self-serving incitement of white nationalism
(whose causes he did little to implement, unlike his steady support for every imaginable Israeli cause, tbe more outrageous the better,
short of war with the "usable" nukes he had had developed for the purpose, that Russia warned him away from) was especially galling
to the top Jews such as the Rothschilds for whom Israel is nothing sentimental, just one more piece in their chess game for world
power.
And thank you for this site which is a beacon of free speech and dissent against our vile, corrupt, incompetent ruling class.
In all the post election rancor little attention has been brought to how razor thin the margin actually was. And with you being
a vociferous critic of Trumps boorish antics and insane foreign policy the candor on this issue is appreciated.
At a minimum the circumstantial evidence of vote counts being stopped in swing states along with gerrymandered rules was highly
suspicious. To claim a mandate on such a close election while losing house seats is absurd but the Republicans bungling the Georgia
Senate run off over $2K checks and a sycophantic MSM ensures they will.
And after abetting barbaric violence and anarchy for months the Democrats will now use trespassing in their "Sacred Temple"
to unleash a crackdown by the national security state and unprecedented censorship and social-credit run by woke-corporate oligarchs.
Interestingly (And as many predicted) it appears they will reopen the economy and declare "victory" over Covid shortly after
Bidens inauguration. Clearly the bizarre excesses of the lockdowns and dynamiting of the economy were calculated to undermine
Trump and consolidate wealth and power from the start.
The question is what exactly this "new normal" will be and how far they're willing to go in order to purge the Trumpists and
populist right. It will be easy to garner support for the latter but if the daily disruptions and financial shocks continue the
system will collapse.
A new, large scale war would be a useful distraction but it's hard to imagine the U.S sustaining one in its current state much
less against capable adversaries like China and Russia.
Then again, arrogant, idiotic, catastrophic policy blunders are the defining feature of this ruling class for the last 30 years
so I wouldn't put it past them given the madness we've seen already.
In effect, America's media and tech giants formed a united front to steal the election and somehow drag the crippled Biden/Harris
ticket across the finish line.
adjustment
via a plastic bag put over their heads. If they were lucky.
There was no real contest. Because? A. Control of the mainstream media was so one sided. And that is where we are at now here
in USA. Imagine, a standing President of the USA has been banned and censored by all the "American" mainstream media giants. Actually,
you do not have to imagine. It just happened: Big Tech and MSM has openly torpedoed the First Amendment and US Constitution. So
we know where they are coming from. It's also kind of disappointing how most of our "representatives" are dealing with this.
The only cause other than himself on which Trump has been consistent is serving Israel. One of the only two major policies
of Obama's that he didn't reverse was support of Israel, though he took it to yet another level. The other one was
increasing military spendings. Obama never cut military spending. My money is on Biden never doing it either, and also
that he will take support of Israel to yet another level. I hope I'm wrong.
On the election night I was listening to two of our New Zealand reporters who were reporting the incoming results. I remember
quite clearly after results had been coming in for a while they remarked: "well that's it another four years of the same". That
were their exact words. That must have been before the postal votes came in, which suddenly changed the picture completely to
Biden's advantage. Postal votes I believe were introduced for the first time in 2020 because of the Corona pandemic. It's believed
that postal votes can be more easily tampered with. Postal votes are expected to remain during future elections I believe.
We are to believe Biden won 507 counties, the least EVER, but won the most votes ever. Trump won 74 million votes, beating Obama's 69 million in 2008, the previous all-time high. Trump won over 2500 counties.
Clarice Feldman at the Americanthinker.com noted that many residences
had multiple votes from the current occupants plus previous occupants (apartment complexes) in this election, because old voter
rolls aren't purged in a timely manner. The same addy might have 3 previous residents voting, plus the same individual voters
legitimately voting at their new addresses.
My advice for whites is this .we will probably be getting in new wars for neocons now, so you might wanna think twice before
signing up for the military. You may find your twenties being used up in multiple deployments in foreign miserable places.
Strange that all these presidential
elections are always neck and neck. Just because there are two parties does not mean that election after election the vote will
boil down to one or two "swing states" and a few thousand votes. Statistically, it just doesn't make sense.
Of course the media loves these nail-biter elections because it drives up their viewership. Every election we get the same
old farcical "debates", scandals and continual ridiculous sound bites. This is strong evidence, if not proof,
that these elections are scripted from beginning to end, even up to and including the "march to the Capitol" and the
ensuing "insurrection".
Exactly. "Spin". He also appears to be entirely ignorant of the fact that the constitution states that each states electors,
and the procedure for choosing them, must be accomplished via the state[s] legislatures, and that in all 6[?] swing states that
recorded early morning, miraculous turn-around votes from Trump to Biden, that that particular constitutional procedure had been
entirely , and very conveniently, ignored:
The Lobby wants Syria by any means, up to a direct confrontation with the Russian Federation. The Jewish hatred for Iran is boundless
(same for Russia – take note, Americans). Zionists care not about human lives.
"I don't know or care anything about Dominion voting machines, whether they are controlled by Venezuelan Marxists, Chinese
Communists, or Martians. But the most blatant election-theft was accomplished in absolutely plain sight".
Cui bono? Obviously the main group profiting from the fraudulent election was the Democratic Party and its supporters. So why drag in foreign governments? Most of them are all too well aware that it's very dangerous to attract the attention of
the USA for good or bad. Like trying to save a drowning whale.
So their sensible strategy is to stand back at a safe distance and watch the monster perish in its own poisons, hoping it doesn't
lash out and harm them in its dying struggles.
The convenient thing about postal votes is that they make it possible to wait until the opponent's votes are all in and counted
– then send in just enough postal votes to tip the balance. It's rather like an auction in which one bidder gets only the one
bid, and then a rival can offer $1 more.
Ridiculous if you want a fair election. But nobody who matters wants or expects anything of that kind. A proper political machine
gets everything cut and dried well in advance.
Trump was unpredictable and, to a degree, uncontrollable. He had to go.
Well said. I'm sure that it's no coincidence that DJT has been involved with televised wrestling over the years. Every great contest requires
a memorable "heel" to engage the spectators. In televised snooker in the UK, final matches often are over best of 35 frames. It's unusual for them not to go to the last
ball of the final frame. Got to have a little drama.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch the rancher counts the silver dollars.
...If ego or narcissism can explain it, so be it. I'll go with insane or suffering from dementia. Any 'drain the swamp' or 'fix
the system', MAGA or "build back better" argument would appeal only to retards. Re-visit Carroll Quigly's succinct description
of political parties in the USA in Tragedy and Hope, pages 1247-1248 (hardcover) or Google same.
I'm beginning to believe that a different species is holding sway and we are the proverbial Eloi.
The point is, it is the average intellect, moral and civic weight of the involved constituencies that allows or doesn't allow
what shouldn't be allowed in a real democracy.
You don't have actual democracy below a lower threshold of intellect and moral and civic worth of all the main involved
parties.
We could in other words say: there will be as much real democracy as is desired by the average citizen, where to desire it
is not to blandly say "I agree with democracy".
It is funny how few people appear to understand that Hunter's laptop was not just a suppressed election decider then an
important reason for Biden's suitability
Yes, few people understand that all regime-approved candidates are people able to be blackmailed for a precise reason, and
not at all by chance. What about Hegel though?
@obvious Globalist
NWO creeps stole the election, they spent 4 years trying to overthrow the 2016 election by coups aided and abetted by the Globalist
Mainslime Media, FBI etc. -- you missed all that of course? .
They also PUBlICLY previewed, as they did the COVID Agenda, stealing
the election a couple months before, gamed and planned it in various outcomes .Anyone who can't see what is up is either willfully
ignorant, lying, or "stupid" as you say.
No decent person is in favor of the Agenda of Harris/Biden serving the NWO "Great
Reset" to crush the Peons -- you must see yourself as above the coming carnage -- I have news for you -- your not.
We'll know we're in an actual civil war when different branches of the military, or units within a branch are fighting each
other or when the police are fighting the military. Don't hold your breath of course because every cop and soldier in America is a traitor and they're all on the same team.
What I still find unfathomable is the fact that the steal was so obvious: so in your face but yet the big media, big tech,
federal and state law enforcements, spooks, judges, big GOP politicians etc still behave like nothing ever happened. Trump and
his supporters are now labeled domestic terrorists and lawfare is about to be unleashed on them. It's surreal.
Had the Orange heeded his MAGA base rather than his (((rat-in-law))) he'd still be President. There was certainly
election fraud; enough of the betrayed base stayed home to make it effective. Trump was a p -- y all four years and got what
he deserved. He was always a stop-gap time-buying non-solution...
...issues can no longer be discussed openly, the reliability of elections in the USA is the most important issue that faces us. The
people will accept an honest winner in a serious election. Nothing is as cleansing to our natural divisions as the result of a
well-contested election, in the knowledge that, in a reasonable interval, the same offices will be up for new contests.
Nothing is as damaging to our peace of mind as knowing that one side won fairly, but was robbed of governing. I thank Ron Unz for writing and publishing such a reasonably argued essay on the matter. It is the gold standard for 2020 election
analyses.
This is sad people. Was talking to a friend and even his 80 something year old mother commented on how decrepit Sleazy Joe
looks and walks. I was watching him deliver "his speech" last night and the guy had a hard time reading a few sentences off the
teleprompter without stammering and stuttering.
After an embarrassing and truly cringe worthy "speech" Biden is seen walking off. The dude can barely walk...
For eighty million who cast their ballots for the old geezer, it's mostly out of economic necessity; however, for the seventy
plus million people who are Trump supporters, it's a fight for their country and more importantly, culture.
Brought to you by the same people who gave us the Weimar Republic, only twice as vicious and vindictive this time because they
know what they did wrong last time -- they weren't vicious and vindictive enough.
When you consider Donald Trump's grotesque antics, his entirely unpresidential behavior, evident falsehoods and blatantly corrupt
actions – together with the systematic media blitz taking every opportunity to show him in the worst possible light; it is quite
astounding that he received as many votes as he did. Far, far more than could be accounted for by simply ascribing them to his
'deplorables'.
And, even if Biden did, in fact, just manage to win – presenting himself as a force of reason, stability and sanity – a great
mass of voters sensed something in him that they distrusted even more than in Trump. That was a stunning rejection – of almost
the same magnitude as Hillary's in 2016!
You're right, and Ron Unz is right. Had Trump retained his white male voters of 2016, the Democrats likely couldn't have pulled
off the steal. But in the end Donald Trump was a mere salesmen selling a con.
...If you had told people in France in 1785 or Russia in 1913 that within a few short years about a quarter of their population
would be slaughtered in revolutionary turmoil and many more displaced, they would have dismissively laughed in your face believing
– as do we – that their civilizations were far too advanced for such nonsense.
Let us hope such a horrific fate is not in store for all of us as the Great Reset is imposed on us all given how western civilization
has clearly failed to the point where some sort of profound, substantive reform is inevitable.
Given that the foundation of this Reset comprises so much ill-will, deception, theft and coercion, it is unlikely that this
new paradigm will benefit the millions of people it will soon dominate.
Another
can of worms, there would be additional Congressional hearings over it, etc. At the time Trump was still in the middle of the
Muller investigation. That special prosecutor investigation tied up Trump until March 2019.
I firmly believe that no man in human history could have taken on and fought Deep State, the Swamp, the Establishment, media,
GOPe, et al., as valiantly as Trump. Even in his 70's the man has superhuman energy, fortitude, and strategizing. I think Trump's
greatest legacy will be that he ripped away the curtain and the masks fell and we all got to see just how nefarious and rigged
the system is, from federal judges to our intelligence community to the FBI/DOJ to Congress to the media
"I don't know or care anything about Dominion voting machines"
Why not? Take a look at Patrick Byrne's summary of evidence for massive election fraud involving the Dominion machines, on
his blog over at DeepCapture.
It will explain how a man who sheltered in his house, did not campaign, drew no more than six or seven or twenty-five people
to his events, got seven million more votes than a man who drew up to thirty thousand people at his rallies.
...An expert witness in Georgia was able to hack into Dominion in front of the legislative committee in less than a minute. "We're
in." In Dominion, and on the internet.
Dominion machines can do anything! They can assign a weight of 1.5 per single vote to one candidate, and .75 per vote to the
other, and can adjust as necessary. They can assign batches of "adjudicated" ballots to the candidate of your choice. They can
just switch votes from one candidate to the other in increments of several thousand, let's subtract 29,000 votes from candidate
a and add them to b's column. They can allow access by a third party to the administrator's identity and password so the third
party can enter and participate directly in tabulation of the votes.
And more. If your disfavored candidate is winning by a landslide and your 1.5/.75 ratio isn't working, you can put in a USB
card and adjust accordingly.
If you're desperate you can upload tens of thousands of votes in a single drop which all, every one, go to your preferred candidate.
And you can do it in one hour on a machine which can only handle a few thousand votes per hour, fed in manually.
If things get out of control you can call a halt to the vote count, send the observers home, and haul out the extra ballots
stashed under the table skirt. But it's best to be mindful of the video cameras. Which they were not.
Really, read about it: Patrick Byrne, DeepCapture, "Evidence That The 2020 Election Was Rigged." Lays out the various ways
by which it was done, then appends evidence using graphs, memos from election administrators, and statistical analysis.
He's no Trump supporter either, is a committed libertarian, and has never voted for either a Democrat or Republican presidential
candidate in his life. He thinks Barack Obama graced the presidency and that Michelle Obama was a class act as First Lady.
Also: The Chinese government acquired Dominion for $400 million in the fall of 2020.
Finally, does anyone think the Dominion case against Sydney Powell potentially offers an opportunity for the evidence of electoral
fraud to be aired in public?
While it's an effective rhetorical tactic by our fearless leader Unz, there's no reason to be agnostic about CIA ballot-stuffing.
That's as blindingly obvious as their censorship.
The ballot-stuffing shows only the most cursory measures to conceal it, consistent with a command structure that exercises
precision control over media attention. CIA can censor adverse information on their candidate's trading in influence and abuse
of function. So naturally CIA dumped votes in statistically absurd proportions, trusting to their Mockingbird media to short-circuit
public inquiry. When you have arbitrary Nazi-grade life-and-death power, as CIA does, it's hard not to get sloppy. They don't
give a fuck that you saw what they did there, cause shut up.
Spot on about postal votes; it's my only slight disagreement with Ron's take on the affair.
These votes were being received for days, if not weeks before the deadline and could have been (and probably were) counted as
they came in. The gross imbalance between Trump and Biden votes in these after-hours counts, along with the sudden spikes obvious
on many graphs, is proof, imo, of the cheat. In order to get ahead of the narrative, the 'rats said it would happen, and, lo,
it did.
If the regime can't provide for trustworthy elections, it can't expect to be regarded as legitimate. Probably by design; they
don't need us.
Navarro's three reports do a good job of summarizing most of the possible vote fraud. He's a Harvard PhD so more than qualified
to pull all the date together etc. They use many graphics and are easy and fast to read.
In this post-Republic new reality, no Court will take a case in which Discovery reveals any sort of election fraud. The election is over and it's now verboten to revisit it. Don't be surprised if
archive.org is forced to delete thousands of articles about it. Orwellian times
Incumbent Donald Trump lost Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin by such extremely narrow margins that a swing of less than 22,000
votes in those crucial states would have gotten him reelected. With a record 158 million votes cast, this amounted to a
victory margin of around 0.01% . So if just one American voter in 7,000 had changed his mind, Trump might have received
another four years in office. One American voter in 7,000
Margins of general vote do not matter. Biden won Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin by much higher margins than 0.01%. In Arizona
Biden won by 0.3% of all votes in Arizona and in Georgia by 0.2%. These are small margins but probably comparable to margins in
swing states in 2016 where Trump won.
@Garliv It's for
your own good, of course. I once read an article written by someone who had a chance to hang out with the rich, powerful, famous,
etc. and gain some perspective on their thinking. They really do believe that it's their role to shape the future for the
proles. I know someone who's just like that.
If you like your bourgeois job and want to keep it, you will support the narrative.
All of the comments on here that analyze DJT's strengths and weaknesses miss the point. I personally think he made some very
poor choices; but, to inappropriately paraphrase Carville, it's the fraud, stupid.
Occam's Razor should be applied- instead of the nonsense of Chavez having an interest in voting software; voting machines being
manipulated; truckloads of paper ballots being moved across state lines- my favorite; etc.
The mail in ballots could be sent to a nursing home or to individuals, who are very old, and these individuals could be instructed
by a relative to sign their name.
I frequently explain to individuals, whose first language is not English, the papers, which they are signing. I explain their
401K and retirement plan withdrawals.
It would be very easy to have individuals in a nursing home or even an adult day care center for mentally (dementia) incapacitated
adults sign ballots. There are numerous day care centers in New York City, federally funded, where individuals could be coaxed
to sign ballots. Just say Trump will close the day care center -- especially where interpreters must be provided because the individuals
cannot understand English due to varying stages of mental incapacity.
The day care center is a racket. I believe the reimbursement rate under Medicaid-Medicare is $120 per day. Plus, the transportation
fee - approximately $40 per person each way. These centers flourish in cities, such as New York City, Newark, Philadelphia, etc. I have yet to hear anyone mention that Nancy Pelosi's father was Mayor of Baltimore, Thomas D'Alesandro Jr. And Baltimore is
one city that it totally devastated by drugs, prostitution, crime, etc.
Now for the important question. Did Nancy Pelosi have $12 pints of ice cream in her office?
But I wonder how many people have watched the twenty hours or so of state legislature hearings related to the election. Can
people just not be bothered? These were historic hearings of huge importance, but I assume they didn't get much coverage in the
MSM. I think most of them were livestreamed only by small right-wing networks.
Servant of Gla'aki 39, Hapalong 101 anent Willke: Willke sold a million books in less than two months. He was more of a media
phenom than Trump, much hotter at the time of the election. They were going to make a movie of One World. And his message was
more populist, too – basically, fuck your US national interest, we want peace and freedom. He just came out and said what everybody
thought, Oh boy, now that we won the war, we'll get the peace and freedom that we fought for! So he didn't need a Sheldon or a
Gina to rig elections and install him.
Dulles was squirming around under rocks at that time (he cut his teeth at the League of Nations founding,) even before he and
his ultras got their Gestapo in Foggy Bottom, and they arranged Hillary-style party machinations to push Willke aside.
Now of course there's a second line of defense, the CIA proprietaries that steal the election directly:
Diebold and its brass-plate acquirers. CIA set them up to ratfuck Kerry and Maduro and sheep-dipped them to ratfuck Trump.
The whole world knows the USA is a ridiculous fake democracy, a totalitarian CIA pariah state voting alone against peace, development
and human rights. (Just look at the 2nd Committee vote on A/C.2/75/L.4/Rev.1) The USA is North Korea with an ugly leisure squad.
It's the beltway that deserves our fire and fury. Just wipe it out with WMD and start again.
What were the results of the 2016 election? Billary received 65 million to Trumps 62 million. Gotcha. So we have roughly 127
million who showed up to vote that time. (Wonder how many of those were legit.) So ONLY 4 years later, Joe "I Look Like I'm Drugged"
Biden ALLEGEDLY received 80 million and Trump received 74 million. Okay, that is a turnout of 154 million votes. So if I believe
in this fairy tale, I was supposed to believe that in ONLY 4 years the vote count increased by an alleged 27 million. Hell, a
lot of our most populous states do not even have that many people.
Like I say, I concede that Biden might have had about 60-65 million LEGIT votes to Trump's MINIMUM of 74 million. Hmm, so that
means that total vote count would be 134-139 million. Hmm, sounds more reasonable to me. Numbers are not adding up folks.
...Laws don't say a little bit of fraud is OK, because the fraud committed on or by a business
didn't cause bankruptcy. Either there was fraud, or there wasn't. If there was, then the results of the election in those areas
are null and void. The certification of those results expands the fraud to the state level.
That several courts refused to hear cases for lack of standing, is patently ridiculous. If a candidate has no standing, who does?
In an election, everybody has standing because they are affected by the result, and by virtue of Citizens United , corporations
do as well.
In an ideal world, we would be discussing how we can ensure the integrity of our elections, so that both substantively and
the appearance of integrity is upheld. Instead, we are trying to get citizens jailed (right & left) for protesting the sanctity
of a system in which both sides know is corrupt. There is no question in Dems mind that Bush stole the election in 2000, so why
is it any different now that the shoe is on the other foot.
Our oligarch rulers know very well that they rig elections, it has been documented under LBJ, not to mention the long list
of coups all over the world organized by the intelligence agencies over the past 50 years, these are historical facts. But rather
than citizens being able to focus on the real problem, we are beating the crap out of our fellow citizens for something we know
all know is real; and pointing to the other side as the source of the corruption. This is exactly why the rich stay rich and the
poor stay poor.
Mr. Unz, who is always well informed, highly organized and impeccably lucid, gives a credible and succinct analysis of the
dumpster fire that is American politics, indeed of this country's leadership across the board. It creates mostly chaos and suffering
every time it meddles in our affairs these days, certainly over the long run but especially in its current crash program to impose
tyranny over the many so the few can take whatever they want whether they require it or not.
Watch this recent interview of Chris Hedges by Jimmy Dore about the root causes of our current woes. Hedges speaks off the
cuff in words that sound as polished, powerful and precise as the language in tracts considered to be classics. His Pulitzer clearly
was not found in a Cracker Jack box.
He ain't buying that Trump alone was the fount of all our sorrows or that a deceiving sycophantic
grifter like Joe Biden is the fix for anything. There were many bad actors, both GOPers and Dems, both office holders and offstage
string-pullers, who have contributed to the coming collapse of this country, which decapitating Trump will not prevent. Joe just
happens to be the useful idiot who will be left holding the bag when the end comes, which won't be long now. Factoring in Kamala's
possible ascension to the throne will change nothing. Like Joe, she's just a cluck there to take the same orders.
@Carroll Price
...Trump also flew on the Lolita express. If after all the broken promises that Trump made
to his Maga followers anyone still thinks that he is an outsider is, frankly, an idiot.
Trump is a lifetime actor and the entire election was just one big show.
One way we will know if Trump really was a threat to the swamp and an outsider will be what happens after Jan 20. If Trump
ends up dead or impoverished and in prison then we will know that he was a real threat. If he flies off into the sunset, perhaps
even starting a media company, then we will know that it was all one big vaudeville act.
The Navarro report provides detailed proof on how elections in multiple states were
stolen. (1)
Open the [MORE] Tab for additional detail.
Given that all rational human beings understand, as a matter of objective proven fact,
that the election was stolen Where do we go from here?
The slender & extreme, authoritarian, Leftoid margin in the House is certain to be a
circular firing squad of internecine discontent. What little they pass will contain more pork
than an industrial pig farm. It will be a matter of months before the U.S. Economy is tanked
by SJW illegitimacy and misrule.
Much like the GOP beat Gerrymandering, with lead time the GOP will beat Fultoning (named
after the Atlanta County). The GOP is sure to take the House in the 2022 elections.
How many times will Biden & Harris be Impeached, shamed, and forced to undergo public
trial in the Senate? There will have to be multiple trials to establish for the historical
record that Biden/Harris Coup plot was vastly more criminal than Nixon, Clinton, and
Trump.
PEACE [Hide MORE]
Theft By A Thousand Cuts' Report Conclusive On Election Fraud, Slams Media Cover
Up
"... , and author of several books, including ..."
"... Inside Iran: The Real History and Politics of the Islamic Republic of Iran ..."
"... . @medeabenjamin; Nicolas J. S. Davies, an independent journalist, a researcher with CODEPINK and the author of ..."
"... Blood On Our Hands: the American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq ..."
"... . @NicolasJSDavies; and Marcy Winograd of Progressive Democrats of America served as a 2020 Democratic delegate for Bernie Sanders,and is Coordinator of ..."
Yves here. Biden's nominees have skewed towards the awful, particularly on the foreign
policy front. But his plan to install Victoria "Fuck the EU" Nuland at State is a standout. For
those of you new to this site and not familiar with Nuland's sorry history, this post gives an
overview of her role in fomenting the coup in Ukraine and in putting relations with Russia on a
Cold War footing. The authors encourage readers to call their Senators and urge them to vote
against her nomination.
And before you get unduly excited by Biden nominating Gary Gensler to the SEC, I would much
rather have seem Gensler at Treasury. Gensler demonstrated at the CFTC that he's effective and
dedicated to combatting abuses by Big Finance. However, his best shot at making the SEC feared
and respected again is to appoint a tough head of enforcement, so keep an eye out for that
pick.
The problem that Gensler will have at the SEC is that it is the only Federal financial
services industry regulator that is subject to Congressional appropriations, rather that living
off its fees and fines (the SEC collects far more than Congress allows it). And Democrats, like
Joe Lieberman, then the Senator from Hedgistan, have been if anything more aggressive than
Republicans in threatening the SEC and in keeping it budget-starved.
I had said to Lambert that if Biden wanted to be Machiavellian, the way to pretend to reward
Elizabeth Warren while actually sandbagging her would be to make her SEC chair. Let's hope that
isn't his logic for appointing Gensler.
Photo Credit: thetruthseeker.co.uk Nuland and Pyatt planning regime change in Kiev
Who is Victoria Nuland? Most Americans have never heard of her because the U.S. corporate
media's foreign policy coverage is a wasteland. Most Americans have no idea that
President-elect Biden's pick for Deputy Secretary of State for Political Affairs is stuck in
the quicksand of 1950s U.S.-Russia Cold War politics and dreams of continued NATO expansion, an
arms race on steroids and further encirclement of Russia.
Nor do they know that from 2003-2005, during the hostile U.S. military occupation of Iraq,
Nuland was a foreign policy advisor to Dick Cheney, the Darth Vader of the Bush
administration.
You can bet, however, that the people of Ukraine have heard of neocon Nuland. Many have even
heard the leaked four-minute audio of her saying "Fuck the EU" during a 2014 phone call with
the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt.
During the infamous call on which Nuland and Pyatt plotted to replace the elected Ukrainian
President Victor Yanukovych, Nuland expressed her not-so-diplomatic disgust with the European
Union for grooming former heavyweight boxer and austerity champ Vitali Klitschko instead of
U.S. puppet and NATO booklicker Artseniy Yatseniuk to replace Russia-friendly Yanukovych.
The "Fuck the EU" call went viral, as an embarrassed State Department, never denying the
call's authenticity, blamed the Russians for tapping the phone, much as the NSA has tapped the
phones of European allies.
Despite outrage from German Chancellor Angela Markel, no one fired Nuland, but her potty
mouth upstaged the more serious story: the U.S. plot to overthrow Ukraine's elected government
and America's responsibility for a civil war that has killed at least 13,000 people and left
Ukraine the poorest
country in Europe.
In the process, Nuland, her husband Robert Kagan, the co-founder of The Project for a New
American Century , and their neocon cronies succeeded in sending U.S.-Russian relations
into a dangerous downward spiral from which they have yet to recover.
Nuland accomplished this from a relatively junior position as Assistant Secretary of State
for European and Eurasian Affairs. How much more trouble could she stir up as the #3 official
at Biden's State Department? We'll find out soon enough, if the Senate confirms her
nomination.
Joe Biden should have learned from Obama's mistakes that appointments like this matter.
In his first
term , Obama allowed his hawkish Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Republican Secretary
of Defense Robert Gates, and military and CIA leaders held over from the Bush administration to
ensure that endless war trumped his message of hope and change.
Obama, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, ended up presiding over indefinite detentions without
charges or trials at Guantanamo Bay; an escalation of drone strikes that killed innocent
civilians; a deepening of the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan; a self-reinforcing
cycle of terrorism and counterterrorism; and disastrous new wars in
Libya and Syria
.
With Clinton out and new personnel in top spots in his second term, Obama began
to take charge of his own foreign policy. He started working directly with Russia's President
Putin to resolve crises in Syria and other hotspots. Putin helped avert an escalation of the
war in Syria in September 2013 by negotiating the removal and destruction of Syria's chemical
weapons stockpiles, and helped Obama negotiate an interim agreement with Iran that led to the
JCPOA nuclear deal.
But the neocons were apoplectic that they failed to convince Obama to order a massive
bombing campaign and escalate his covert,
proxy war in Syria and at the receding prospect of a war with Iran. Fearing their control
of U.S. foreign policy was slipping, the neocons launched a
campaign to brand Obama as "weak" on foreign policy and remind him of their power.
With
editorial help from Nuland, her husband Robert Kagan penned a 2014 New Republic
article entitled "Superpowers Don't Get To Retire," proclaiming that "there is no democratic
superpower waiting in the wings to save the world if this democratic superpower falters." Kagan
called for an even more aggressive foreign policy to exorcise American fears of a multipolar
world it can no longer dominate.
Obama invited Kagan to a private lunch at the White House, and the neocons' muscle-flexing
pressured him to scale back his diplomacy with Russia, even as he quietly pushed ahead on
Iran.
The neocons' coup de grace against Obama's better angels was Nuland's 2014 coup
in debt-ridden Ukraine, a valuable imperial possession for its wealth of natural gas and a
strategic candidate for NATO membership right on Russia's border.
When Ukraine's Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych spurned a U.S.-backed trade agreement with
the European Union in favor of a $15 billion bailout from Russia, the State Department threw a
tantrum.
Hell hath no fury like a superpower scorned.
The EU trade
agreement was to open Ukraine's economy to imports from the EU, but without a reciprocal
opening of EU markets to Ukraine, it was a lopsided deal Yanukovich could not accept. The deal
was approved by the post-coup government, and has only added to Ukraine's economic woes.
The muscle for Nuland's $5 billion coup was Oleh
Tyahnybok's neo-Nazi Svoboda Party and the shadowy new Right Sector militia. During her leaked
phone call, Nuland referred to Tyahnybok as one of the "big three" opposition leaders on the
outside who could help the U.S.-backed Prime Minister Yatsenyuk on the inside. This is the same
Tyanhnybok who once
delivered a speec h applauding Ukrainians for fighting Jews and "other scum" during World
War II.
After protests in Kiev's Euromaidan square turned into battles with police in February 2014,
Yanukovych and the Western-backed opposition
signed an agreement brokered by France, Germany and Poland to form a national unity
government and hold new elections by the end of the year.
But that was not good enough for the neo-Nazis and extreme right-wing forces the U.S. had
helped to unleash. A violent mob led by the Right Sector militia marched on and invaded the
parliament building , a scene no longer difficult for Americans to imagine. Yanukovych and
his members of parliament fled for their lives.
Facing the loss of its most vital strategic naval base at Sevastopol in Crimea, Russia
accepted the overwhelming result (a 97% majority, with an 83% turnout) of a referendum in which
Crimea voted to leave Ukraine and rejoin Russia, which it had been a part of from 1783 to
1954.
The majority Russian-speaking provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk in Eastern Ukraine
unilaterally declared independence from Ukraine, triggering a bloody civil war between U.S.-
and Russian-backed forces that still rages in 2021.
U.S.-Russian relations have never recovered, even as U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals still
pose the greatest single
threat to our existence. Whatever Americans believe about the civil war in Ukraine and
allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, we must not allow the neocons
and the military-industrial complex they serve to deter Biden from conducting vital diplomacy
with Russia to steer us off our suicidal path toward nuclear war.
Nuland and the neocons, however, remain committed to an ever-more debilitating and dangerous
Cold War with Russia and China to justify a militarist foreign policy and record Pentagon
budgets. In a July 2020 Foreign Affairs article entitled "Pinning Down Putin," Nuland
absurdly
claimed that Russia presents a greater threat to "the liberal world" than the U.S.S.R.
posed during the old Cold War.
Nuland's
narrative rests on an utterly mythical, ahistorical narrative of Russian aggression and
U.S. good intentions. She pretends that Russia's military budget, which is one-tenth of
America's, is evidence of "Russian confrontation and militarization" and calls
on the U.S. and its allies to counter Russia by "maintaining robust defense budgets,
continuing to modernize U.S. and allied nuclear weapons systems, and deploying new conventional
missiles and missile defenses to protect against Russia's new weapons systems "
Nuland also wants to confront Russia with an aggressive NATO. Since her days as U.S.
Ambassador to NATO during President George W. Bush's second term, she has been a supporter of
NATO's expansion all the way up to Russia's border. She calls
for "permanent bases along NATO's eastern border." We have pored over a map of Europe, but
we can't find a country called NATO with any borders at all. Nuland sees Russia's commitment to
defending itself after successive 20th century Western invasions as an intolerable obstacle to
NATO's expansionist ambitions.
Nuland's militaristic worldview represents exactly the folly the U.S. has been pursuing
since the 1990s under the influence of the neocons and "liberal interventionists," which has
resulted in a systematic underinvestment in the American people while escalating tensions with
Russia, China, Iran and other countries.
As Obama learned too late, the wrong person in the wrong place at the wrong time can, with a
shove in the wrong direction, unleash years of intractable violence, chaos and international
discord. Victoria Nuland would be a ticking time-bomb in Biden's State Department, waiting to
sabotage his better angels much as she undermined Obama's second-term diplomacy.
So let's do Biden and the world a favor. Join World Beyond War , CODEPINK and dozens of other
organizations opposing neocon Nuland's confirmation as a threat to peace and diplomacy. Call
202-224-3121 and tell your Senator to oppose Nuland's installation at the State Department.
Nuland has also been declared persona non grata by Russia, so she would not be able to go
with Biden, were he to visit Moscow. Russian foreign minister Lavrov, actually refused to
shake her hand when she attended a US-Russia meeting with Kerry. She is poison to any attempt
to peaceful relationships.
Yes, I remember that meeting clearly. Can't cite the network, but it covered her closely
– body language only. I wonder where Biden stood on that act of diplomacy given his own
corruption, and also what John Kerry's thinking is about now. John Kerry's stepson was in
cahoots with Hunter Biden. It looked like Kerry brought her along for some rehabilitation and
Lavrov was having none of it. Instead he went directly to the delegation from Ukraine and
they stood in a circle all with their backs turned to Vicky who had no choice but to wander
over to the coffee table and pretend she wasn't totally uncomfortable. Totally excluded. How
can she recover from that?
If there is one thing that Russia hates it is fascists and that is because of the enormous
damage caused by them in WW2. We call those invaders Nazis but the Russians seem to call them
fascists. I sometimes wonder if it is part of their mother's milk this hatred. For people
like Nuland to help topple the government of a large, bordering country like the Ukraine and
install people that were literally fascists was too much for the Russians. These were fascist
of a very low order that had the old 1930s routines down pat, including the torchlight
parades. And there was Nuland, handing out cookies to the rioters, many of whom had been
trained in rioting tactics in Poland and were being paid about $100 a day by the US if I
recall correctly. Of course Nuland was not alone as there was also a Representative from the
EU also handing out cookies. The only equivalent that comes to mind is a violent revolution
in Canada using professional rioters and having diplomatic representatives from the Russian
Federation and China handing out donuts to the rioter. I wonder what Washington would say
about a stunt like that.
Nuland is a disgusting human being. Since she is a right winger, regardless of what party
may be listed on her voter ID, I don't think Bettridge's law applies here at all.
So glad all these 'woke' people put good old Uncle Joe back in office. Wonder how many
realized they were supporting people being burned alive by actual Nazis in doing so?
Thanks for this. Our "learned nothing/forgot nothing" Bourbon restoration will be led by
one of the dimmer Bourbons who couldn't even set up a good grift in Ukraine without boasting
about it and then angrily denying it. Should the press finally, improbably turn on him it
should make for some fun news conferences. But perhaps he'll merely be moving to the White
House basement from his Delaware basement.
CFTC's budgets are also set through congressional authorization and appropriations. Yes,
the CFPB is not subject to Congressional appropriations, but for good reasons. However, all
financial regulation can be overturned by the Congressional Review Act.
As for the article, citation needed. Sort of a laundry heap of questionable material. Make
no mistake, the Russo-Ukrainian War is a real war. Uniformed Russian armored infantry of
331st regiment of the 98th Svirsk airborne division dropped into Ukraine territory on 24
August 2014. From 25 to 27 August, Russian troops in civilian clothing, backed up by an
armored column [not in disguise] took Novoazovsk. This is about Russia not being able to
station 25,000 troops in Crimea as they had under Yanukovych. US troop levels in Europe have
been at their lowest for the last 20 years. The US would like to [nay, needs to] keep it that
way. However, the erosion of territorial integrity is a touchy subject in Europe given the
lasting peace of the post-war period in a place where the wars have a pre-fix like "Hundred
Years".
President Arseniy Yatsenyuk is of Jewish origin so the claims of coordination with Nazi
sympathizers is dubious. Not even going to get the boycotted unconstitutional Crimean
referendum.
As for WW III, Obama's defense department made it a priority to recover all the MANPADS,
such as the Chinese-made FN-6 [via Qatar], Russian-made Strela-2's and Igla-S's [via Libya]
from the FSA without so much as a thank you from the Russian Air Force. [Turkey, on the other
hand, armed the FSA with Stinger's.] It should be noted that the Syrian conflict's death
toll, in just four years, surpassed the 19-year death toll in all the Afghanistan, Pakistan,
and Iraq war theatres combined.
Think about this way: who needs NATO and the EU more to maintain his power structure, Joe
Biden or Vladimir Putin. Isn't it clear Americans don't care, and American business does not
look to compete in Russian anytime soon. The geography is wrong. But Putin must find a way to
engender ethnicities who do not like the Russian Empire, who had been cleansed by Stalin. One
way is to sell energy below cost to the republics and buy in back from political allies in
the form of electricity. Something upon which the EU frowns. [Personally, I did not care for
the way Putin early on systematically and indiscriminately starved Chechen civilians for
years. It was cruel on a level unseen outside of the Rwandan genocide. More importantly, it
was the Russian Federation abdicating its authority by not providing for its own citizens and
not letting NGO's fill the calorie gap. I'd like to think had Putin's admin not been so
wobbly the first few years, he might've let the Red Cross feed the children.]
Russia was never going to permit a US orchestrated coup in Ukraine without resistance. The
idea that Putin needs NATO more than Biden does seems unreasonable.
Talking about "citations", perhaps you could supply the readership of this site with some
credible citations and links for a few of the far fetched claims you're making here. Most of
this comment reads like pro-Ukrainian propaganda.
I heard about Gary Gensler, Samantha Power, and Victoria Nuland, and I immediately
thought, "The good, the bad, and the ugly."
Gensler surprised everyone when he was at the CFTC by doing his job, and doing it well,
and his running the SEC is a good thing.
Samantha Power is an aggressive war monger, and in her position at USAID, she will likely
have her fingers in regime change pie, since USAID is part of the deep state regime change
apparatus..
I've long suspected that NATO has existed since 1991 to allow the US/EU axis to control
Middle-Eastern and African resources. For example, the Rammstein military hospital is where
every Gulf War soldier was airlifted for major treatment and convalescence.
Also, there is a huge international trade in opium. It's grown in Afpak and shipped out in
every direction. I suspect that a fair amount of that flows through Ukraine and Crimea. If
you look at a topo map of Crimea, there's a lot of seashore that could be good "smuggler's
coves". Following this line of argument, Russia grabbing it from Ukraine was a gimme to
Russia's gangsters. This, as well as the "Pipeline Wars", gives Russia a strong reason to
encircle Ukraine.
The Putsch Govt and Tech & Media Oligarchs are "Riding the Tiger"
The reason I'm laughing, is because Joe and the deep state are exposing themselves for
who they are, a bunch of corrupt government officials who don't have the support of the
citizens.
Joe is going to have a really hard time unless they institutionalize the election
fraud and continue it, which is my biggest fear because it means we've become a corrupt
banana republic, and poverty will quickly ensue.
Big government brings poverty to the
public (and riches to the deep state) while freedom (i.e., small government that just
protects our freedoms, rather than socialism that promises to provide for us but instead
brings government forcing us to work) brings prosperity to the people.
They've lowered the bar considerably. Once Republicans take congress back in 2022/24 they
had better immediately impeach both Biden and Harris concurrently. Biden for his Ukraine
dealings and Harris for inciting riots over the summer, saying they should never end. They
have no excuses. It should be in the GOP platform. Make impeachment the Democrat's
problem.
get nothing and like it 4 hours ago
The precedent is set - impeachment can be for anything without any merit. Start the Biden
impeachment now!
US Banana Republic 4 hours ago (Edited)
Congress has resisted the temptation to use Impeachment as a political tool of
vindictiveness for almost 250 years. In one fell swoop Nitwit Nancy Pelosi cheapened it to
satisfy her selfish vengeance.
I am ashamed that she is an American.
Nancy is 80 years old. Likely in 20 years she will be dead and certainly forgotten. But
this damages our country and our Constitution forever.
jim942 11 hours ago
Mitch thinks he is going to purge the Republican party of Trump influence?
jim942 11 hours ago
The New York Times reported that McConnell has told associates he is privately pleased
with the impeachment, calculating that it will make it easier to purge the party of Trump's
influence.
tangent 23 minutes ago (Edited)
In your honor I will do three minutes of research into the claims of election fraud
tomorrow. Here is what I found in three minutes today:
Wisconson:
45% of the WI mail-in ballots are invalid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1692&v=XH9ihoLi1NA&feature=youtu.be
And, a Wisconson supreme court judge ruled those votes should be tossed: https://rfangle.com/politics/trump-wisconsin/
These absentee votes went from from about 14,000 in 2019 to about 169,000. This type of fraud
alone resulted in an estimate of 76,000 illegal votes.
The problem is they will never investigate because the dictator has already been
appointed.
hoytmonger 19 minutes ago
With evidence like youtube videos,
What court in their right mind wouldn't look at that case?
tangent 17 minutes ago
The source for this information is the Voter Integrity Project. Sorry you don't like being
proven wrong.
tangent 7 minutes ago
I believe they showed that there were about 100,000 people who made false claims of being
too handicapped to vote regularly in Wisconson. Everyone has a bias, so by your standard
nobody can do the study.
BoiledFrogs 41 minutes ago
In truth, Snowden told us about the Deep State. As for the swamp, they've been teaching
government by the bureaucracy in college political science for decades.
Trump showed us nothing. He simply hitched a ride on our anger and resistance, rode our
coattails.
Face-off 1 hour ago remove link
This is called being railroaded...on a hyped up bogus charge. T
Xena fobe 3 hours ago
Trump was impeached by multinational monopoly corporations for the crime of representing
the people of the US.
John Hansen 3 hours ago
That sums it up pretty good.
de tocqueville's ghost 3 hours ago
the person who videoed the woman being shot was a convicted BLM activist...I wonder why he
was in the building right behind her?
NoBigDeal 3 hours ago
Apologies. CIA putting on an Oscar winning performance as a MAGA loving Trump
supporter.
mojo_jojo 12 hours ago
Democrats are truly delusional. They keep telling the big lie to try and convince everyone
that it's true.
PyrrhicVictory 1 hour ago (Edited)
Trump accomplished exactly zero.
Trump didn't even try.
Why did Trump even want to be President?
Mamachief 1 hour ago
I've asked myself the same question.
Vanity?
Judge_Smails 1 hour ago (Edited)
Do you really think Trump gives a sh*t about a West Virginia coal miner or a Michigan auto
worker? No - he only cares about his Wall St buddies and Billionaires
OutaTime43 2 hours ago (Edited)
Article 5 is the final hope. Conservatives need to put forth an amendment to the
constitution to add term limits to congress. Via state conventions. It's the only real
solution.. Forget twitter, etc. This is the real thing that would make a difference.
Time to put an end to the career politican and all the corruption it brings along with
it.
OutaTime43 1 hour ago remove link
Hyperbole much? 3 terms for the house. 2 terms for the senate. After those, you get out
and let someone else run. Simple. Vastly reduces corruption.
NAV 2 hours ago
" Today We unconstitutionality Impeached an Innocent Man!" -- - Mark Levin
(Levin will be on Hannity tonight arrmed with the information that the Capitol Police and
Metropolitian Police had intell the day before the rally that armed groups were planning
violence, but their requests for extra security were turned down. In all probability Pelosi
and Schumer knew about this and maybe McConnell. But no one told Trump who should have been
warned by the FBI to remain home.)
chiquita 2 hours ago (Edited)
I've been posting all day that Pelosi refused to add any extra security/protection to the
Capitol despite being asked under the circumstance that there would be big crowds. The whole
incident was a planned set up and everything moved way too fast afterwards to make it
anything but that. Remember Rahm Emmanuel's "don't let a good crisis go to waste"--in this
case they took an opportunity, created a crisis and ran like hell with it. They haven't
stopped running yet.
Lucius Septimius Pertinax 2 hours ago
Nancy is making a big mistake. By doing this impeachment she keep Trump in the news. You
know the saying, there is no bad news, only being in the news. Trump is getting all the air.
If you do not want him to run again, you do not give him airtime. Also conducting another
impeachment. without debate, without presenting evidence, without allowing the defense to ask
questions and present a defense, is called a kangaroo court, and may even in the end provide
some sympathy for Trump. This is the type of impeachment one would likely see in Stalin
Soviet Union. Lastly she is not doing anything to promote unity.
Libtard Clown World - The New Nazi Party 4 hours ago
Ever wonder why the DNC kneecapped Bernie Sanders? ...
littlewing 4 hours ago
Kamala put blacks in for profit prison owed by Diane Feinstein for smoking pot and kept
them there beyond their sentences.
Lucius Quinctius 4 hours ago
Further , she laughed when asked about her own pot use.
radical-extremist 4 hours ago (Edited)
Trump was at no time a danger to the country. He was a danger to the entrenched elite
establishment in Washington. He was a threat to their power and control over the country.
They were afraid he was going to expose their racket and every time he hinted that he would,
the hammer came down. He was not going to be a "team player" like most outsiders are
threatened to agree to. "Six ways to Sunday." ...
12Doberman 5 hours ago
"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every
security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether
he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass
arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people
had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs
door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and
had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers,
pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps
were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you'd be
cracking the skull of a cutthroat."
― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
onewayticket2 5 hours ago
is the Peace deal (historic) "unethical"?
was giving away his salary unethical?
cutting taxes unethical?
unprecedented vaccine development to save millions of lives is unethical?
AHBL 5 hours ago (Edited)
1) His peace deal? Are you talking about Israel's pacts with Middle Eastern
countries...those are grotesquely unethical
2) Yes, when you compensate for it by renting out your hotel rooms to foreign dignitaries,
fail to divest, allow for your son in law to do business deals in middle east
3) Absolutely. More trickle down economics increasing the wealth gap and further lowering
the effective corporate tax rate, which is already at a historic low of 11% average
effective
4) That's just sad, you are giving Trump credit for that one...but that's fine, i'll agree
it happened during his term...despite the fact he royally screwed over Covid response
dogfish 5 hours ago
Not for lack of trying to start wars.
LA_Goldbug 6 hours ago (Edited)
Democrats are the modern version of Communists.
Pervert Clinton pardoned Senate bombers and there wasn't even a stir. Why ? Because it was
a Juice Rosenberg . Now a few dimwits stormed the Capital and Trump is made to be
responsible. US is finished if this goes through.
kharrast 6 hours ago
The impeachment will pass but I don't think the senate will convict. In the end, it will
be a meaningless media show. What else are they going to do. No one will watch TV to see what
Sleepy Joe and Kamala are up to.
NAV 11 hours ago (Edited)
Regardless of whether he is convicted in the Senate, a second impeachment would further
stain a presidency that has culminated in a frightening assault on the storied center of the
American democracy. -- - Bloomberg
Bloomberg! From Bloomberg, the biggest reject in the Dems primaries, toppling like all the
rest of the rejects until they finally got down to the only primary rejects left, Biden and
Harris.
the storied center of the American democracy?
Congress? That den of thieves and traitors? We are witnessing before our very eyes the
takeover of the United States bu a massive power network of oligarchical conspirators; how
they gained control over the press, radio, tv and social media; how they manipulated
themselves into total control of the Congress, the courts, and now the presidency; and how
they used open borders to over rule the vote of the majority of the America people by handing
it over to third world socialists.
And it all began in earnest when a handful of international bankers took control of
America's currency and parlayed it into the world's reserve currency - all which they own -
via the Fed.
consider me gone 1 hour ago
World Tribune: Pattern recognition specialist Jovan Hutton Pulitzer has released his
report on election fraud and foreign interference in the 2020 election which concludes that
by "eliminating the counterfeit mail-in and absentee ballots," President Donald Trump "almost
certainly wins."
Dyler Turddin 54 minutes ago
If there was so much fraud in the 2020 election, then why did the Republicans gain so many
seats in the House? And again, why did they have to have a runoff January 5th in Georgia to
decide the Senate? If there was massive cheating and fraud, they Democrats would not have
been stupid enough to let the Republicans pick up seats. You idiots think they targeted Trump
with cheating and gave all other republicans a pass.
Fart Vandelay 1 hour ago
Here is your daily update Trumptards. 7 DAYS left to ACCEPTANCE
Let's see where we are.
Trump is going to win in a landslide
Republicans are going to win back the house
Trump is winning by bigger numbers than 2016
Independents will break massively for Trump
Trump can still win without Arizona
Release the Kraken
Trump can still win without Wisconsin
Trump can still win without Michigan
Trump can still win without Georgia
Trump can still win without Pennsylvania
Release the Kraken
Trump can still flip Arizona back
Trump can still win with the Supreme Court
Release the Prawn
Trump can still win with faithless electors
Trump can still win in Congress in January
Trump will try to cry like a b1tch to his Trumptards claiming he has proof
GA goes red and declares Trump winner~3k idiots show up to another rally on Jan 6
Trump will not leave office and will evoke the Insurrection Act <=== You are
here
Trump leaves as a disgrace and the worst president in history
Trump is free to run and win in 2024
Kamala files criminal case against Trump
Trump won't be indicted
#LOCKHIMUP become top trending on Twitter
Trump won't be convicted
Trump won't spend any time in prison
Trump will be pardoned.
Kamala won't be president.
tangent 1 hour ago remove link
By all appearances Trump actually did win the 2020 election. By the way, how many wars do
you suppose you're invalid hero Biden and her police state sidekick Kamala will start?
blumenthal 4 hours ago (Edited)
i could still remember the campaign, it was a debate with Hillary:
Hillary: "it is just awfully good, that someone with the temprament of Donald Trump ist
not in charge of the law in our country"
Donald: "because you'd be in jail!"
I thought to myself, hopefully he's not a big mouth. Unfortunately, it has been confirmed
during his term in office, because draining the swamp has not worked out, on the contrary, he
has brought some bog bodies in the team. I am disappointed because I had hoped for more from
him. His Middle East policy was also a big failure, too much Israel, the canceled treaty with
Iran, war in Yemen, the cowardly murder of Soleimani .........
Lucius Septimius Pertinax 4 hours ago
This time it is. Impeachment is not removal. And this impeachment in the house, was
without debate, and without trial. Even if removal happened in the Senate, (which is
unlikely) it is not binding, as Trump does not hold office.
John Hansen 4 hours ago
Nancy made it trivial.
TryingSomethingNew 5 hours ago remove link
The NANNY-NANNY FRAUDSTER MORONS impeached my President again, so he couldn't run for a
second term, in spite of brokering peace in the Middle East, lowering prescription drug
costs, and generally kicking *** in a skillful and efficacious manner. That is PRECISELY the
type of stupid, petty ********, that (dumb) posturing posers do in ineffective workplaces,
institutions, and governments around the world.
hcettnauq 5 hours ago
"brokering peace in the Middle East"
nonsense. Throwing the Palestinians under a bus isn't "brokering peace." The treaties that
Chabad terrorist Kushner put together serve Israel and the Saudi Arabian beheaders that Trump
bowed down to.
KidTwist 5 hours ago remove link
Cocaine Mitch may be pleased in deep-sixing Trump, but the ******** just signed the Repubs
death certificate.
JSBach_1 6 hours ago remove link
Recall what Nancy Pelosi stated publicly:
Nancy Pelosi:If capital crumbles to the ground, o ne thing that'll remain is "our"
commitment to Israel :
Trump's 2016 Presidential campaign was one of the greatest marketing campaigns ever - they
made a New York real estate shyster look like a Man Of the People.
Not if you account for Hillary's proxy war in Syria.
hoytmonger 2 hours ago (Edited)
Yes, it does.
Take into account drone strikes in Yemen and Somalia.
Then the massive increase in bombing in Afghanistan.
Trump dropped 3-4x as many bombs.
SurfingUSA 3 hours ago (Edited)
I was 9 when JFK went thru his public execution. I remember feeling sick to my stomach for
an age afterwards. Like history had been ripped and interrupted and it was a mistake.
Now of course I am more philosophical about Trump getting jobbed, but without irony, I am
just glad that he was not similarly assassinated except in slow motion.
The globalists and Deep State pay NO ATTENTION to any president who sneaks in without
their blessing, so all those who thought DJT could prevail based on his authorit-tay alone
were mistaken. He would have had to compromise his populism even more than we saw, and go
full-CCP, to out-Biden Biden etc. Or else get the military on his side on Day 1 and engineer
our transition from a Constitutional Republic to a soft dictatorship. Coloring within the
lines, as we saw, no longer works.
alleger 2 hours ago remove link
The main flaw in your premise is that you assume the oligarchs behind the curtain are too
dumb to conjure up a populist hero for whom the 'bewildered herd' can suspend their
disbelief.
Hence, you let a New York billionaire tycoon--who's created nothing of value all his
life--do all the dystopian sh!t you accused his opponent of wanting to do; and you let him
get away with it.
Trump speech on Jan 06 was extremely weak "stream of consciousness". He failed to formulate
one clear goal: by standing on the steps of Capitol to pus some pressure on the Congress to elect
commission to investigate voter fraud. He was all over the place instead. But I would not call it
"an incitement". What he in clearly guilty is "reckless endangerment" of his supporters. He let
the crowd without any leadership, organization and security. He was a coward. As the result the
rally was easily hijecked by extremists and infiltrated agents provocateurs. How Trump will
probably the pay the price for his cowardice.
Looks like military industrial complex (Cheney daughter is a typical representative) is not
that happy with Trump.
At least some of these Antifa were agent-provactuers.
littlewing 40 minutes ago remove link
I'm not mad anymore. Trump did a lot.
He finally got you to boycott the big corps.
He made you realize that MSM is poison
He made it clear there is a uniparty.
He took down the Bush Dynasty.
He didn't start wars.
He showed you that you needed to make wise decisions.
He tore the veil.
I'm happy ...:)
Fart Vandelay 39 minutes ago
He printed $7 TRILLION and jacked stocks and crypto
I'm happy ...:)
DisturbedSilence 36 minutes ago
Yes he should have learned all about wise decisions...his appointments were awful..,
chiquita 47 minutes ago
Someone else posted this below, but I'll post it again. Excellent analysis of what
happened around Ashli Babbitt shooting--should have been must watching by all Congressional
members before they opened their big fat mouths today:
I was just thinking about the tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of people around the
world who died because of Bush/Cheney and comparing that number to all the people around the
world who died because of Trump/Pence. Anyone have the stats?
owlpellets PRO 57 minutes ago
And Obama Biden
ReadyForHillary 54 minutes ago
Barry/Joetard are the all-time warmongers.
We had 15 years of continuous war before President Trump came along.
The Persistent Vegetable 53 minutes ago
Oh did the wars end? How come no one told us?
replaceme 49 minutes ago
Trump's military and career civil servants lied and pretended to draw down forces. We're
not at the controls any more. And you're ****e.
Kina 2 hours ago (Edited)
So now do we see the number of Deep State owned members of Congress.
Rid'n Dirty 1 hour ago
War criminal Cheney's daughter is a multi-millionaire whose fortune was built on the bones
of well over a million dead Afghani goat herds and Iraqis. Afghanis were hired by the CIA in
the '70's to fight the Russians and the Iraqis were hired to fight the Iranians. When Cheney
needed more cash he started a war so that Halliburton could sell a gallon of gas to the Army
for $100. a gallon.
Lizzy Borden Cheney is covered in the blood and guts of innocent women and children but
she hates violence? I'm sure that she'll fiind a WMD somewhere among the Trumpers or kill
them all trying.
AuEagleNest 55 minutes ago
All true. **** Cheney, Rumsfeld, John Yoo and Bush should've all been tried as war
criminals.
Libtard Clown World - The New Nazi Party 3 hours ago
The same party who stalled for 10 months on a 2nd round of stimulus checks for the people
slammed home a bogus impeachment in a week's time.
Joe Potato 1 hour ago
What does it matter? Nobody is going to do anything about it. The justice system is
corrupt. The military is corrupt. The bureaucracy is corrupt. The Senate is corrupt. The
house is corrupt.
There is no system of government left in the US to stop the corruption
outsider9 3 hours ago
where in the speech from Trump did he say they should storm the capitol by all means
available and get inside and do violence? Once again, the dems are just playing with
hypotheticals and thinking they know what Trump was thinking. These are people who really
serve no good, but themselves and their true constituents: china, corporations and whoever
can pay top dollar like soros.
Mad Machine 3 hours ago
Does the mob boss tell his henchmen to kill so and so? No, he tells them to "take care of
it". He's still responsible for them acting on his behalf. It's no different with Trump. He
told them to march on the Capital, and they did. It was all on his behalf.
12Doberman 3 hours ago
He said march down to the capitol to support those that are objecting to the electoral
certification in certain states.
Xi the Pooh 10 hours ago (Edited)
The damn capitol police opened the gate and let them in!!
AND ITS TIME FOR TRUMP TO GO ON THE OFFENSE!! NO MORE BEING A BIG *****!!.. PARDON ASSANGE
AND SNOWDEN IMMEDIATELY AND START DECLASSIFYING DOCUMENTS!!
Do you think any election of any kind in any place within the USA will have a result not
predetermined by the intent of Deep State.
America you will have no more elections, that are elections.
This theft as obvious and blatant as it was, makes it clear now that there is no way of
stopping any electoral corruption Deep State wants.
Deep State are now doing what Hillary Clinton was meant to do behind the scenes.
You will have no more elections.
Only soap operas with MSM puppets trying to make it look real.
America has become 'The Truman Show', you are now all Truman Burbank.
except their are no exit doors.
Oldwood 1 hour ago
Our elections have officially evolved to pageantry now, results predetermined and
blessed...if they are to be considered valid anyway. This is what Hillary taught us...the
failure of a progressive to achieve victory is the definition of election theft, whereas a
conservative failure is the certification of election integrity.
chiquita 1 hour ago
Wow! Marjorie Taylor Greene--newbie House member (10 days) just announced on Greg Kelly
that she plans to introduce impeachment articles against Joe Biden on January 21st. She's
serious and has all her ducks lined up about it. Whoo hoo! The fun begins.
ProblemReactionSolution 1 hour ago
just as much of a waste of time as the Dems first impeachment of Trump, which they knew
was doomed from day 1 because the Repubs controlled the Senate
Dems control the House, so impeachment of Biden will not make it out of committee.
You'll have to work on 2022 if you want to change that
kharrast 1 hour ago
Yes it is a waste but it further demonstrates how it is a partisan political process and
not a legal or criminal process. In the future, all presidents will be impeached throughout
their terms in office.
chiquita 49 minutes ago
Thank Nancy Pelosi, Jerry Nadler, and all the other Democrats in this Congress for the new
precedent. However, if this action against Biden is presented, there is far more criminal
evidence against him than anything they tried to conjure up about Trump, who did nothing
wrong that warranted impeachment not only once, not a second time either. I believe there is
an indictment in the Ukraine against Biden for his involvement with corruption and other
crimes, including taking money from political officials there, which is also illegal
here--this is all outside of the stuff on Hunter's laptop about the money from China. These
things will be a little difficult to ignore or refute, especially if Ukrainian legal people
are brought in to testify about the indictment there. Could be even though presented by
Republicans, the Dems let it go through just to save any Amendment 25 to get rid of Joe,
which would eventually happen if he doesn't die on cue when they need him to.
Mr Perspective 3 hours ago
Ponder this - someone posted this comment on another website
"Here is what is VERY, VERY STRANGE, to the point of revealing: After clearing the
Capitol of its "unexpected guests," security apparently failed to thoroughly and carefully
sweep all occupied areas for destructive devices, biological and chemical agents and hidden
unauthorized personnel BEFORE allowing the members to occupy their work spaces again. A
proper search would have taken days to plan and execute. It would have involved many highly
educated and trained specialists that would take days to arrive, set up, work and report.
The work of many teams would have to be reviewed, at least once, before clearing the
facility for operation.
YET THE MEMBERS RETURNED WITHIN HOURS OF THE MASSIVE SECURITY BREACH.
Clearly, clearly, something is not right here.
And it continues not being right."
chiquita 3 hours ago
Again--I'll point out that Pelosi was responsible to approve the amount of security that
the Capitol police put in place to protect the building. When the head of Security consulted
her ahead of January 6th with concerns about the March for Trump because of the large numbers
of people expected, Pelosi refused additional security measures, which could have included
more staffing, additional/better barriers around the building, and possibly requesting
National Guard presence. What happened was a DNC planned operation and Nancy was in on
it.
OutWithLibs 3 hours ago
Projection....Accuse someone else of doing something while you are doing it yourself
OutaTime43 1 hour ago
Liz Cheney voting to impeach. While her father lied us into a war which killed well over a
million. Let's not even discuss 911 (read "Crossing the Rubicon"). Her father and the doltish
ex president he controlled should have been poster children for impeachment.
Absolutely correct. He was not one of the club and he had the audacity to not only run for
the presidency but to win. He and his supporters MUST BE DESTROYED!
heehaw2 2 hours ago
Big Tech has proven they now run and own the United States. They have censored half of
Americans voice and information. They have locked down the RNC email so we can't contribute
(not that I would until they clean out RINOs).
Biden never won, and is not liked. He is a Global Tech Puppet.
NIRP-BTFD 2 hours ago
Big Tech all funded by the CIA. The CIA and their oligarchic owners in the 0.01% run
you
Robert De Zero 3 hours ago remove link
Maxine Waters:
"Let's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that
Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you
create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they're not welcome anymore,
anywhere..."
This was not incitement?
President Trump:
" I know your pain. I know you're hurt, We had an election that was stolen from us, but
you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We don't want
anybody hurt."
This is incitement?
adamsmith10 3 hours ago
Three skyscrapers. Two planes. No real investigation. Any questions?
Giles Vilhelm Klintoon Jr 3 hours ago
A governing body with a 13% job approval rating, votes by majority to impeach a President
with a 48% job approval rating. Cool.
McLaughlin Poll: GOP Majority to Reject Those Voting for Impeachment
"Overall, survey results showed impeaching Trump in the final days of his presidency was
widely unpopular, according to McLaughlin of McLaughlin & Associates."
"
Among the findings:
60% of battleground voters viewed the Democrats' second impeachment effort as a waste
of time.
80% of Trump voters and 76% of Republicans indicated they were less likely to vote for
a congressional member who votes in favor of impeaching Trump.
48% of all voters said they were less likely to vote for a congressional member who
votes in favor of impeaching Trump.
65% of all voters said President-elect Joe Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi,
D-Calif., were "making this worse and keeping the country divided" by continuing to attack
Trump.
Nearly 75% of all voters "agree that efforts by Pelosi and the Democrats to try to
impeach the President after Joe Biden is sworn in would be politically motivated to prevent
the president from running again, stripping his Secret Service protection, and preventing
him from having a Presidential Library," per the memo."
The situation is that the Media Oligarchs, politicians, and our black-robed judiciary have
closed the door on freedom of speech in America. It is gone. Now, as with the Chinese, we
have to find the video which is the basis for Impeachment of a duly our elected President
from a foreign source.
"We're going walk down to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our brave senators, and
congressmen and women."
"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to
peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."
I don't see where Trump encourages anyone to go INTO the Capitol. Nonetheless , the
Capitol Visitor Center is open to visitors from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through
Saturday except for Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, New Year's Day and on Inauguration Day.
Capitol Visiting Hours - Open
to the Public..
rwe2late 9 hours ago
Sounds like a micro-aggression against the Capitol "safe space".
nsurf9 9 hours ago (Edited)
More like, letting your enemy into your House to talk things over, only to then call the
police on him to be arrested - because you reported him as a trespasser who's broken into
your house.
rwe2late 8 hours ago
Obviously,
having a public demonstration against their policies made some Congresspersons (even if
only one) feel uncomfortable
and created a "hostile work environment" for them.
Robert De Zero 50 minutes ago
No state-wide recounts.
No cases heard in the Supreme Court.
No meaningful debate in Congress.
Mike Dense fell on his sword, "I can't."
Now Trump is impeached again on Trumped -up charges.
The flag is flying at half mast in Biden's dark winter. Now I know what he meant.
el_buffer 1 hour ago
The Senate won't follow through with it. Even then they won't get the votes.
What these morons in the Democrat Party are failing to understand is that you can't keep
pissing off working-class people anymore. If the violent fringe elements on both sides figure
this out and unite, they'll make the recent riot look like a picnic. Heck, I live in Portland
and Antifa is now going after the Mayor with no fear.
PS I loved watching Ted Wheeler cower before the criminals he empowered all last year.
Tikaro 57 minutes ago
If you like seeing them cower, you'll love this one af a lady ripping Chuck Schumer.
I was never a Trump fan. But he does have one good legacy. Showing the right wingers that
this isn't a free country, that is hasn't been in decades and how powerless they are against
the establishment. And that's a good legacy. Because no one should live in a fantasy.
adamsmith10 3 hours ago
The right wingers you speak of are classical liberals
RoboFascist 1st 4 hours ago
Who is more desperate for needing 20,000 troops to protect them from being killed by the
American people... Biden or Pelosi?
xious 3 hours ago
Harris is a real man, he's not scared.
tangent 28 minutes ago
I think you are just going for downvotes and don't believe you own words.
Domestic terrorists - one can reasonably argue, are those who align with foreign enemy saboteurs of any given country to undermine
and destroy say, a Presidential Election by widescale and seditious vote rigging to the extent a new and illegal regime will be erroneously
installed to run the country for four years. That those who object against this state of felonious affairs - all 75,000,000 voters
for one candidate and millions of others whose votes were given to the alternate choice, are now maligned and regarded as unpatriotic
is a travesty of monumental proportions.
US
government account . @POTUS : In light of reports of more demonstrations, I
urge that there must be NO violence, NO lawbreaking and NO vandalism of any kind. That is not
what I stand for, and it is not what America stands for. I call on ALL Americans to help ease
tensions and calm tempers. Thank You.
Twitter randomly shut my account down with no explanation. They do this to thousands of
conservatives every single day. When the press reported the ban, it was lifted. What about
the thousands of Americans who have been banned and are never heard from again? 13.9K 12.3K
42.5K
To ANY GOP member who votes to impeach this President: We will make it our mission to ensure
you never make it out of your next primary! We will camp out in your home states and help
your opponents reach as many voters as possible! This includes you @senatemajldr 1.9K 11.8K 40K
BREAKING: 80% of Trump voters and 76% of Republicans are less likely to vote for a member of
Congress who votes for impeachment. Quote Tweet Trump War Room @TrumpWarRoom · 14h
MUST READ: Newly released 'Battleground Voter Survey'
If you're shrugging off or celebrating cops killing a Trump supporter, you're taking the
wrong lesson about police brutality Quote Tweet Caitlin Johnstone @caitoz · Jan 7 Just
so we're clear, the policing lesson for today was not that cops should have been more brutal
with the Trumpers, it was that they should have been much more restrained during the BLM
protests but chose not to be. Don't let them troll you into cheering for police brutality.
Thank you for this very interesting analysis. I actually have noticed a sort of hurt
little girl in her when she speaks.
That said, I don't really feel sorry for her but for us, the citizens of our country, who
have to put up with her damaged psyche, which causes her to use liquor, ice cream and
chocolate to assuage the pain.
I am and have always been forever grateful for my own father. He was not a wealthy man,
but he was the best father a young girl could ever have. I've put all that Oedipus Complex
analysis aside and have lived knowing how much he loved my mother and his children. That made
up for all the wealth that other men, fathers of many of my friends, which caused them to
demand enormously high expectations of their children. In most cases I out-performed those
girls in school and in my working life. I was able to do that simply because I knew my
parents felt I could do well since they raised me with values other than the greed for money
and power.
Now, please provide an analysis of Diane Feinstein. My bet is that her father was the
Devil himself.
What an insufferable crone. Her power seems to have derived from and is sustained by
being a major conduit between ambitious pols and the tremendously wealthy oligarchs of her CA
district.
Her Mom's birthname was Annunciata. Her son Tommy said that she was the true politician in
the family. During the depression, hungry people or those seeking work came to her seeking
help, not her husband. And the line would extend halfway around the block. During her
husband's elections it was her that organized volunteer ladies to write letters, make fliers,
and address envelopes. Every evening in the run-up to the election she would host ravioli and
lasagna parties. Not just for volunteers and neighborhood ladies from Little Italy but also
for the wives and daughters of other Baltimore ethnic groups. She was described as being a
stereotype of old world motherliness but was no doormat. She she was a very fiery woman with
a lot of moxie. Her political insight and common sense judgement was the reason she was her
husband's main political adviser. I seriously doubt that her husband could have made her dump
Velvex cosmetics unless she too realized it was in trouble. Ditto for any real estate. She
was a child immigrant born in a mountain town of south central Italy, only 15 or 20 miles
from Monte Cassino. .
Tommaso her husband was no raging bull. If he had been he would have banned her being on
the boards of the Red Cross Home Nursing Association and the YWCA, plus her involvement with
Sodality and other church organizations. But with five sons growing up in his home he perhaps
had to birch them into shape every now and then when they were teenagers. The people of
mountainous Abruzzo, the Abruzzese, where his parents immigrated from are known throughout
Italy as being strong and kind . BTW it was he that dedicated the Stonewall Jackson
and Robert E. Lee Monuments in B'more.
Absolutely reprehensible person.
People such as Pelosi and McConnell are why congress is held in such low esteem by
Americans.
Graft corruption and in fighting seem to be all that branch of government is capable of
now.
Interesting. Seems like sound analysis and does, indeed, explain a lot of Pelosi's
behavior.
SWMBO has been telling me for a few years that the crazy trouble making female liberals
all have "daddy issues"; all of them. In fact, she is convinced that daddy issues leads one
to be liberal in general. Same kind of Electra complex you note in Pelosi and, in men, a
sense that they cannot measure up and achieve what is expected of them, which, in turn, leads
them to criticize and reject the existing structure. It's way for the defeated to pretend
that they are not defeated, but more enlightened.
Perhaps it's in the nature of political operatives with an unsavory agenda: they choose
damaged people as front men (women) to carry out their plans.
Woodrow Wilson comes to mind. Whether or not the tale of the blackmail letters from a
former lover are true, Wilson had other vulnerabilities. Joyce Carol Oates's The Accursed
slices and dices Wilson savagely.
Haim Saban invested in Hillary Clinton at a time when she had been about as publicly
humiliated as a woman can be. He poulticed with cash & power those wounds in her
psyche.
It's not unlikely that Nancy Pelosi's psychological vulnerabilities, coupled with her
early exposure to the exercise of political power and relationships with influential Jewish
leaders, were assets, in the eyes of those who use her for their purposes.
Jeffrey Epstein couldn't compromise everybody.
---
My four grandparents and my mother were born in Barrea, about 60 mi. NW of Pelosi's origins.
I never knew my grandparents, but I recognize the style of paternal control. In my Mother's
case -- she graduated from 6th grade at age 16 and was offered a scholarship to the high
school the French nuns ran. Her father said No, she had to go to work to help support the
family, not so much a case of "Italian American men were like that in that era," as "an
Italian American laborer had to do what he must to keep his family fed" -- which is what
brought him to the USA in the first place. My Mother completed her GED at age 65.
My own father was born in USA of Italian immigrant parents who were probably illiterate
(in English). I came upon my Father's grade school report cards: his mother signed the first
few with an X; the next few with her printed name, and finally, her signature in script.
My Father benefited enormously from the Americanizing impact of WASPish public schools,
then US Navy in WWII until he was wounded and medically discharged. He was intelligent,
possessed self-discipline and a sense of order, but his peasant background made him less
socially polished than was acceptable to my own spouse and in-laws whose American roots were
deep; their family members observed the fighting from their farm on the edge of the
Antietam.
American leaders intent on opening borders to one and all would do well to spend some
think-tank time considering how immigrants are supposed to learn how to be American, and how
matings between long-term Americans and the newly arrived are going to navigate a marriage
and child-rearing.
thanks pat... it widens the picture... projection is a powerful force in her life it
seems.. i think you are right in your analysis.. she is living in the past, like a lot of
people today...
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) flipped the script on Democrats on the House
floor today.
After a summer of Democrat-sanctioned rioting and $2 billion in damages,
Democrats and their fake news media are trying desperately to push to the American public that Republicans and Trump
supporters are the violent ones.
On Wednesday Rep. Gohmert read off Pelosi's previous statement on the
House floor. It did not occur to Democrats that Louie was quoting Speaker Pelosi.
They lost it!
Louie
Gohmert:
I just don't know why there aren't more uprisings all over the country and maybe there will be.
FBI alone could have prevented this. They have all the information. But it looks like they
wanted it to happen. "Repeated requests for Guard assistance were denied and delayed, even though
hundreds of National Guard were on standby outside D.C." -- that can be interpreted in two ways
-- one is that false flag operation has the support of Pentagon, and another that Pentagon was
waiting for Trump supporters which were aptly called Rabble Without a
Cause (who have no organization, no plans, and no weapons) to overrun and, possibly,
vandalize, the Capitol; to achieve what? The latter is much less plausible than the first. Looks
like somebody at the top wanted protestors in to compromise Trump and remove him from the
political scene, once and for all. That does not excuse Trump own incompetence, but still...
Repeated requests for Guard assistance were denied and delayed, even though hundreds of
National Guard were on standby outside D.C.
As protesters stormed the Capitol Wednesday, then-chief of U.S. Capitol Police Steven Sund
says he
requested National Guard assistance six times both ahead of, and during, the attack on the
Capitol, and that each of his requests were denied or delayed. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser placed
frantic calls to the Governors of Maryland and Virginia asking for the National Guard to send
help.
On Tuesday, Bowser had sent a
letter to Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy, acting Attorney General Jeffery Rosen, and
acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller, explicitly stating that she did not want
federal law enforcement personnel to provide additional support on Wednesday, and that Capitol
Police were prepared to deal with the expected activity.
During an emergency meeting called by Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) with the Maryland police
and National Guard, House Minority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) called Hogan from "an
undisclosed bunker" and told him Capitol Police were "overwhelmed" by the mob storming the
Capitol, The Weekreports
.
There were 500 Maryland National Guard members on standby outside of D.C., ready and waiting
to assist. Yet Hogan had to tell Hoyer that he still didn't have authorization to send the
National Guard, despite the urgent pleadings of the House's No. 2 Democrat.
It wasn't until 90 minutes later that Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy called Hogan to
ask, "Can you come as soon as possible?"
Hogan responded, "Yeah, we've been waiting. We're ready."
Home / Articles / Politics
/ Pentagon Chief Waited Hours To Send Capitol Aid: Why? POLITICSPentagon
Chief Waited Hours To Send Capitol Aid: Why?
Repeated requests for Guard assistance were denied and delayed, even though hundreds of
National Guard were on standby outside D.C. WASHINGTON,DC-JAN6: Tear gas is fired at supporters
of President Trump who stormed the United States Capitol building. (Photo by Evelyn
Hockstein/For The Washington Post via Getty Images)
As protesters stormed the Capitol Wednesday, then-chief of U.S. Capitol Police Steven Sund
says he
requested National Guard assistance six times both ahead of, and during, the attack on the
Capitol, and that each of his requests were denied or delayed. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser placed
frantic calls to the Governors of Maryland and Virginia asking for the National Guard to send
help.
On Tuesday, Bowser had sent a
letter to Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy, acting Attorney General Jeffery Rosen, and
acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller, explicitly stating that she did not want
federal law enforcement personnel to provide additional support on Wednesday, and that Capitol
Police were prepared to deal with the expected activity.
During an emergency meeting called by Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) with the Maryland police
and National Guard, House Minority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) called Hogan from "an
undisclosed bunker" and told him Capitol Police were "overwhelmed" by the mob storming the
Capitol, The Weekreports
.
There were 500 Maryland National Guard members on standby outside of D.C., ready and waiting
to assist. Yet Hogan had to tell Hoyer that he still didn't have authorization to send the
National Guard, despite the urgent pleadings of the House's No. 2 Democrat.
It wasn't until 90 minutes later that Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy called Hogan to
ask, "Can you come as soon as possible?"
Hogan responded, "Yeah, we've been waiting. We're ready."
"I can't tell you what was going on on the other end, on the decision-making process," Hogan
said .
"There's been lots of speculation in the media about that, but I'm not privy to what was going
on inside the White House or inside the Pentagon."
The Army
says that they received the first call for help from Bowser shortly after 1:30 p.m. on
Wednesday, followed by several additional calls for assistance.
Several groups, eg., Antifa, QAnon, etc had been boasting in the days and weeks before
that they were planning to go to the Capitol on January 6th and sow chaos. It was all over
the 8chan analog chat room boards. It is impossible to believe that our intel agencies and
FBI where unaware. More likely they helped stoke the unrest by using contracted agent
provocateurs to goad the fringe groups into attacking the Capitol and cajole naïve Trump
supporting bystanders into joining them. I also think the CIA, FBI, and DOD conspired to
withhold intel and security support at the Capitol precisely so rioting could ensue with
little resistance and have the dual effect of tainting the MAGA movement while shutting down
the election fraud debate. That the CIA, FBI, and DOD would, let alone could, set such a trap
for the President goes to show how corrupt the deep state has become and how diminished in
stature the Presidency has become.
That the CIA, FBI, and DOD would, let alone could, set such a trap for the President
goes to show how corrupt the deep state has become and how diminished in stature the
Presidency has become.
1. During the January 6 attack by Trump supporters while Congress
was in session, DC Mayor Muriel Bowser requested additional backup from
the D.C. National Guard, but received no response from the Pentagon.
2.
Mayor Bowser then contacted the governors of both Maryland and
Virginia, frantically requesting that they activate their national
guards.
3. The governors were "repeatedly denied approval to do so.
4. Only until over an hour after the attack began did Secretary of the
Army Ryan McCarthy activate the D.C. National Guard, leaving Mike Pence, members of Congress,
and Congressional staffers in
grave danger for over an hour.
Wait, hold up, Bowser is mayor of DC but she and the DC police have no jurisdiction over
the Capitol. She may or may not have dithered over whether the DC metro police needed
National Guard support for areas around the Capitol, but what does that have to do with the
Capitol riot itself?
The anti-Trump campaign, from Russiagate to Ukrainegate to this 'insurrection' nonsense,
has likely done more damage to the U.S. than Trump managed to do during his four years in
office. The hostility the Democrats have show will create a huge backlash. Do they really
believe that can suppress 74 million Trump voters?
For the outside world Trump Impeachment 2.0 can only appear as a kangaroo trial.
...
This ongoing project to impeach President Donald Trump for a second time in a little over
a year is farcical. ...
What happened in Washington, DC, on January 6 was by no means an insurrection. Of
course, US citizens were behind the Capitol Building siege. But the parallel ends there.
There was no way they could have usurped power in America last Wednesday. In fact, even
the vandalism was entirely due to the ineptness of the security personnel deployed
there.
...
What is the guarantee that another Trump will not arise from outside the cabals that
preside over politics in America and reaches out to the people directly? The fact of the
matter is that Trump's support base still remains the envy of any American politician.
Seventy million Americans voted for him last November. That massive support base will
feel further disenfranchised or disempowered by what the cabals are perpetrating on the
Capitol Hill.
The real paradox is that the "mob" who besieged the Capitol building was largely drawn
from the American middle classes -- the petite bourgeoisie or the 'transitional class,'
as Karl Marx described them ...
...
Make no mistake, this class is here to stay in America and if the post-pandemic economic
recovery does not go brilliantly well or is mismanaged, its ranks will swell further.
That is going to be Biden's real challenge even if Pelosi were to dispatch Trump into
political wilderness.
The backlash from this Trump impeachment will be huge. It may come in rare events of
real domestic terrorism. But it is more likely to swell up through smaller acts of civil
disobedience. There is a lot that the petite bourgeoisie can sabotage. The CIA has
published volumes of advice, meant for people in other countries, on how to do that.
Joy Reid just spoke on MSNBC of the necessity for "de-Baathifying" the Republican
Party to rid it of Trumpian influences.
An excellent precedent. It has worked just great in Iraq.
The Democrats aren't stupid. They know that they are provoking more strife. They will
use that to roll out authoritarian measure that will serve the powerful.
The events on Jan. 6th was a carefully orchestrated trap set in place by democrats and
republicans, at least at leadership positions, to get rid of Trump and his brand once and
for all. Of course, Trump and his MAGA clowns were too stupid to see this and this kind of
stupidity should have consequences.
And now that he is deserting his follower on a daily basis, he will be forgotten soon.
But I'm afraid the discontent is here to stay and soon we will see an uprising. Then,
remains the terrifying future prospects of this new government. Either way, living in US
will be hell for the next two years.
US political scene is so poisoned, and trust is at such a non-existent level that only a
quasi revolution will be able to put an end to politics as we know it. Revolution not in a
traditional sense perhaps, but a political/social awakening. This will need abandoning this
Democrat/Republican circus show and start being Americans. Otherwise, we will allow
ourselves to be pons in this sick charade for years to come.
Sadly, smart money will be on complacency and status quo after the uprising has been
extinguished.
It is a suppression strategy that has, at times, worked in other countries.
I'm reading an interesting article that has cost a senior fellow of the Cato institute to
lose his job. The title is Reichstag Fire '21. Some Illarionov, a former Putin economic
adviser working with the Cato for over 15 years.
It won't be pleasurable to machine read it, but give it a try, might be interesting as
part of the big "migration" taking place, digital and analog.
No, there was no attempt at insurrection by the protesters at the Capitol building. You
imaging that there was an insurrection attempt is just a symptom of hysteria, like your
imaging the Russians were taking over for the last four years. It is an indication that your
rational mind has failed and that you are overcome with fight-or-flight fear-based emotional
reactions, with that fear being implanted in your head by the corporate mass media in order
to remote-control your behavior.
A central rule of a color revolution is to avoid an "orderly transition". The new regime
must have a revolutionary mandate instead of a democratic one. Only then can it operate
outside the constitution and outside the law.
The plan here is to declare not only Trump illegitimate but his whole administration
illegitimate. The new regime can then undo all of Trump's executive decisions. There is no
need to "stuff" the Supreme Court with extra judges. Simply declare Trump's appointments null
and void.
Anyone who thought voting in Biden was going to end the circus is sadly mistaken. The refusal
of a large section of the population to recognize Trump as President has merely set the tone
for a large portion of the population to think of Biden as illegitimate. If Biden uses
domestic terrorism legislation to try to control the opposition it won't end well. Bring on
the lions and Christians and any other unpopular section of the country.
A half century of downward mobility -- crippling of the real economy in which productivity
was rewarded -- and neglect causing deterioration of infrastructure (including meeting basic
human needs like health care), have brought the U.S. to a state of collapse.
Almost everyone seems to sense this and we feel powerless to rectify the situation through
accepted channels, thus some people believe they have a 'patriotic' duty to use other means.
The combination of disenfranchised minorities and disgruntled middle class becomes dangerous
(to the established order) as soon as both groups realize they can't win by blaming and
fighting each other.
We haven't reached that stage yet, judging from the comments I've read in the mainstream
media, however it's just a matter of time until they do. The divide-and-rule political game
keeps people attached to ideology of left vs right until it becomes clear that we all lose by
adhering to this mode of thinking.
The war racket and a whole range of other exploitative financial policies are driven by
the top echelon of elites, who also control the narratives through media propaganda.
Their game is failing and they're resorting to draconian control measures to prop it up,
but this can't continue much longer.
As I see it, the collapse of the Western financial system could happen suddenly or
gradually, or it could bring the ultimate destruction of human civilization. In any case, I
believe our degradation of the natural world will be the real catalyst leading either to
human extinction; or else if we're lucky and smart enough, will induce us to massively
downsize our population and industrial activity in order to let the ecosystem heal
itself.
Giraldi's current essay hits on numerous points already brought forth by b and barflies,
and IMO is a very well balanced look at the outcome and possible road that lies ahead.
The citation he opens with IMO gets to the heart of the matter of what's been building
since the 2000 election and its Judicial Coup:
"In a recent article Catholic University professor Claes G. Ryn wrote [Link at
original]
"Few people are really open to persuasion in any case -- not just on political subjects
but on any subject about which they care and on which they have adopted certain views.
Diehard partisans for a certain outlook will refuse to have their beliefs questioned, and
so will many others. They will be no less dismissive of a document challenging their
opinions if it is full of footnotes and appendixes. Such a document will, indeed, make them
resist it even more. As for the relatively few people who are truly open-minded, they will
not find another person's observations dispositive. They will, as they should, want to
consider the evidence on a contested matter for themselves."
We experience the above daily here at MoA. IMO, economic reality will alter the equation
once the eviction and foreclosure restrictions end unless some very enlightened legislation
is proposed and enacted.
Rep Jason Crow (Dem Colo) "I had a lot of conversations with my Republican colleagues. ...
A couple of them broke down in tears ... saying that they are afraid for their lives if they
vote for this impeachment."
The only thing they (RINO's, the non Trumpers) are afraid of loosing is their seat on the
gravy train express. They are afraid of loosing their seat at the sleaziest brothel in the
world, totally bought and controlled by powerful interest groups and foreign governments with
Israel being by far the biggest one that controls that chamber. There, fixed it for you Mr.
Crow. Rep Crow could well end up eating crow when this is all over.
IMO a large number of his supporters like Pat Lang don't care much for him or his policies
specially his Israel first policies, majority are America first conservative nationalist they
will look for someone else to lead and reorganize, that's when this divide will become
dangerous and scary. IMO that is the only reason they really didn't damage the building or
even hide themselves behind mask they are not afraid of being identified.
That is even more scary for those who hope there wouldn't be a civil uprising challenge the
establishment .
"The hostility the Democrats have show will create a huge backlash. Do they really
believe that can suppress 74 million Trump voters?"
They don't have to suppress 74 million Trump voters. They don't have to suppress
any of the Trump voters. They just have to hold on to the 81 million Democratic
voters, and will probably be joined by a relative handful of Republicans who, out of disgust
and anger at Trump, will cross over and join the Democrats.
Of course, if the mass of everyday, relatively uninvolved Democratic voters finds out the
truth about the true past and about the true intents and purposes of the Biden-Harris
wrecking crew, it's possible that some small percentage of them will stop voting and/or
switch to minor parties, but it's unlikely that such a small desertion will swing any
election to the Republicans, especially if the Biden administration is smart enough and
loose-fisted enough to toss a few financial crumbs to the mass of unfortunates who are
staring homelessness and starvation in the face.
One result of the eight-year Obama administration was a small group of Democrats who did
exactly that -- they walked away while the vast majority of registered Democrats ignored
Obama's long list of crimes and misdemeanors and pretended not to see or to know of his lies
and betrayals of the working class. So the principled deserters are already gone, and those
left in the party are hard-core, thick-headed party-above-principle-in-all-things grifters
and groupies who will stick to the party through all manner of thick and thin circumstances.
They're not going to participate in any "backlash."
The Democrats have proven themselves complete idiots for years and years and years. The
Republicans are batshit crazy. The last election from the Democratic POV was to remove what
they perceive as an existential threat to 'democracy' which is another word for 'deep state.'
It is no wonder the rush to judgment to confirm what they already believe about DJT. Critical
thinking and common sense are not attributes the elite political class possess. They are all
vainglorious grifters.
The USA is FUBAR and none of the king's horses and none of the king's men etc. etc.
etc.
The Trump supporters do not care that he is a murderer and a scoundrel as well as yet
another US President that started yet another war against a Muslim country.
They think that US can survive a centuries-long war against Islam.
That is a major flaw in their estimation of US power and fragility of what they have in
the United States.
1.2 billion Muslims, 1.2 billion Chinese, and a 130 million Russians believing that the
United States is their enemy.
No amount of domestic political change in the United States can address this.
In 1976, a 17-year old American boy could travel alone in Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
etc. without any fear; he would be welcome because of the correct foreign policy of the
United States.
Americans have lost that and are discussing the deck arrangements on Titanic.
In 1976, a 17-year old American boy could travel alone in Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc.
without any fear; he would be welcome because of the correct foreign policy of the United
States.
In Laos, Vietnam or Cambodia the "correct foreign policy of the United States" was in full
display. The US was always a murderous monster. The only difference is that it has turned on
itself.
"The Trump supporters do not care that he is a murderer and a scoundrel as well as yet
another US President that started yet another war against a Muslim country."
As you know this is not unique to trump supporters for as long as I have experienced this
a fundamental group think in America. Americans from early school days are thought the you
are "special" and "indispensable "
And "exceptional" they are thought never to accept or believe defeat never agree or accept
"mistake" never agree or accept "lack of knowledge " this not just Trump is the entire
nation' by now this group think is injected in sole of the nation on hourly bases. This
people are just beginning to doubt or question their government' sincerity and its design
while middle easterners never trust the government. It will eventually become more difficult
for US governments to govern under the mistrust that is building up. New honest deal will be
needed.
Pepe Escobar: 9/11 Was the Prelude. 1/6 Is the Holy Grail
So where will 75 million disenfranchised voters – or 88 million Twitter followers
– go?
As it stands, we're deep into Hardcore Class War. The Top of the Scam Gang are in full
control. The remains of "Democracy" have gelled into Mediacracy. Ahead, there's nothing but
ruthless purge, protracted crackdown, censorship, blanket surveillance, smashing of civil
liberties, a single narrative, overarching cancel (in)culture. It gets worse: next week, this
paranoid apparatus merges with the awesome machinery of the United States Government
(USG).
This is the ultimate foretaste of the century.
If you think change has been fast the last two months, y'aint seen nothin' yet! Take-off
starts from 20th January. That is a point of no return. The engineers of this mission cannot
afford to go back.
2022/2024 electins??? Just dreaming. Not a chance (if at all, 100% controlled digital
elections with predetermined digital results).
The Blue state has ousted Trump; and Blue has taken everything across 'the board', and
are ready to implement the 'Re-set' – the ultimate subjugation of Red by main
force, achieved by the preponderance of wealth, ruling institutional leverage, and military
power. A social 'woke' revolution, as well as a political transformation. The full outcome
would likely reconstitute the constitutional order, in ways unrecognizable to most
Americans today.
That is what it is all about. The purge that will take place is all bout laying the
groundwork for the implementation of the Great Reset as spelt out by the WEF. The same people
who sponsored Event 201 that foreshadowed COVID-19. Yeah, purely co-incidental!!!
Trump's election delayed the project and they had to rig the election in the swing states
to ensure the project was delayed no more.
The second impeachment is not to remove him from office but to bar him from ever holding
office again. Sabotage 2024 before it even gets off the ground.
The only question is, what will be the outcome when you go to war with half the electorate
and persecute their leader ?
Returning fire , newly elected Georgia Congresswoman to file Articles of Impeachment
against Joe Biden on the 21st. What sort of traction the action might gain is unknown at
present; but as I've written, there's plenty in Biden's past that ought to have disqualified
him for any political position and made him unelectable.
The only question is, what will be the outcome when you go to war with half the electorate
and persecute their leader ?
Posted by: Down South | Jan 14 2021 9:43 utc | 111
That's a good question. I think Pelosi's lost her mind. Clearly reflection on past
misadventures is not on the table. Maybe instead of the renewal of faith and common purpose
what we get is the last exciting plunge into the drain.
Yes, it is just starting. They're delusional if they think it's done and dusted as that
author does.
"Pollster Frank Luntz released results Monday from a poll of Americans who support
President Donald Trump after the lethal rioting at the U.S. Capitol.
Luntz said that he polled 800 Trump voters and found that a great majority of them would
vote for the president again if given the opportunity.
"Despite their criticism of his conduct since November 3rd and last week,
𝟵𝟭% of Trump voters say they'd still vote for him if another presidential
election were held today," Luntz said on his official social media account." "Luntz said that of the Trump voters he polled, 73% said the election system was rigged,
"even after being reminded that Trump and his allies lost more than 60 cases in court
challenging election results."
And 61% of the Trump voters polled said they would "never" trust election results
again."
Happened across a great 20-minute YouTube video about the blatant and ongoing US/Western
hypocrisy regarding what happened at the Capitol and what the US inflicts on others.
Those events that the US mediacracy has made so much of were relatively brief and mild
when put into context, but as in Shock Doctrine, the shock is played up and the crisis is
readily and extensively made use of by the establishment.
It's from YouTuber Daniel Dumbrill, a Canadian expat in China who has lived in Hong Kong,
so it relates to what happened in Hong Kong, but the same exercise could probably be done
with other US-sponsored insurrections like Maidan in Kiev, Ukraine, the attempt in Belarus,
and the countless other protests/insurrections inflicted by the US.
The theatre of what's happening in Congress is amusing, even if it seems to be a play by
grade-schoolers instead by Broadway. The Dems seem sure their strategy will cripple the
Repubs, and there's a good chance that could happen. But McConnell controls the Senate until
Jan. 20, and can start the impeachment trial at any time he chooses (he has hinted that it
would be on Jan. 19th). Do the Dems really want to spend their important "first hundred days"
impeaching someone who is no longer there? If it didn't totally shut down decisions on other
issues (cabinet hearings, stimulus checks, healthcare, etc.) it would delay them greatly.
Even though Schumer would then be in control, Senate rules would require rules of order that
could make the trial go on for weeks. I would think the public backlash could be harsh.
Of course there are many Repubs who I assume would like to see the whole thing disappear
quickly, as a prolonged trial will allow the Dems to milk the "domestic terrorists" angle
even more, pointing the finger at those lawmakers who were complicit (real or perceived) in
stoking the uprising. This could play into McConnell's decisions as well.
From my POV, above the "two party illusion", the impeachment could be the best thing to
throw a monkey wrench into whatever upcoming fuckery is in store (as Caitlin J. wrote, "Biden
will have the most diverse, intersectional cabinet of mass murderers ever assembled"). Unlike
Trump's dysfunctional presidency, this team will have the deep ties with neo-liberal (and
neocon) heavy hitters in the MIC, big tech, Wall Street, etc., and may be ready to hit the
ground running. Victoria Nuland's appointment was the icing on the cookies to highlight our
awful state of affairs.
The term terrorist imply that a person is ready to commit violent acts against common people
or officials for political purposes in the name of the particular ideology (communism, islamism
or any other ism). The term terrorist also presuppose existence of some terrorists organization
that shared this ideology and goals. Demonstrators did not have any organization, and had no
agenda other the their (legitimate) frustration with the election fraud. It was essentially a
mob, possibly incited and driven in by agent provocateurs. While being stupid to be lured into
the trap, they actually did not have any "terrorist" intention. They did not set the building on
fire, for example.
For now, this
definition from 18 U.S. Code § 2331 is worth studying:
(5) the term "domestic terrorism" means activities that -- (A) involve acts dangerous to
human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended -- (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to
influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the
conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur
primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
One of the first acts at the Capitol on January 6 was "demonstrators" breaking windows.
There's also documented evidence that Capitol police attempted to turn back some of the
people that entered the building, both verbally and by launching teargas at them. Documented
evidence also shows items were stolen from the Capitol building, and that property in it was
damaged.
■ Breaking windows in federal property is a crime.
■ Refusing to obey instructions given by a police officer is a crime.
■ Stealing federal property is also a crime, as is vandalising government property.
The group of people that entered the Capitol committed crimes. They committed these crimes
whilst entering, and in, the Capitol with the intention of influencing or swaying Republican
acceptance or objection of Electoral College votes. Therefore the people that entered the
Capitol on January 6 can legally (but perhaps not morally) be known as "domestic
terrorists".
"By coincidence, the very day of the takeover -- and without referring to it -- the New
York Times told us that "a debate has broken out over whether the once-sacrosanct
constitutional protection of the First Amendment has become a threat to democracy."
I'm sorry, but one more comment on this. The sheer magnitude of the (pretend?) stupidity
here is impossible to quantify or describe with words. So stupid!!!!!
The entire point is that the government does not get to decide what is truth!!!!!! This is
Orwell's 1984 and the left–half the country–truly understands nothing!!!!
The central overwhelming issue in Western Civilization is not racial warfare but class
warfare. Class warfare is being waged against the ninety-eight percent of Western
Civilization, by avaricious, power-hungry people who are actually less than one percent of
the population. The main quest of these elitists is power control. Elitists do not covet
wealth so they can have nice things wealth is a tool to acquire power and control.
While it is true that the different races tend to occupy different social classes the only
interest the elites have with racial issues is using them to strike discordance between the
races to facilitate their control. The enemy of the ninety-eight percent is the elitists and
their minions.
@Thomasina
the politicians not ignored the Constitution and rigged the election, Trump would have won
and there wouldn't have been a rally.
Also if Trump has stuck to his campaign pledges 2016, worked every day for his people (MAGA
not MIGA) and selected his team from his very loyal supporters (rather than the Swamp), he
would probably have easily won the election – and had big support whatever happened.
Instead, he turned into the champion of Israel. He's from New York, his family is Jewish,
his friends are Jewish, he always chose Israel over the USA – and now his best friends
have kicked him out and he's on his own. Good riddance.
No, of course not. But, but under the definition you listed above, the ADL/SPLC and other
major Jewish Supremacist Organizations (JSOs) certainly are and should, therefore, be
designated as domestic terrorist organizations and disbanded immediately.
Not so. The presidents team only filed 7 cases. the rest were third parties.
Of the 7 2 found rule changes should not have been done (PA, WI) but no judge was going to
overturn results.
The dems weaponized mail in voting to benefit Biden. Were signatures checked in GA, PA,
WI, MI?
One researcher found Fulton County, GA did 106,000 adjudications with a staff so small at
an average rate of 30 seconds per adjudication they would have taken until jan 5 to do HALF
of them.
When pressed on how this could be possible the GA secretary of State and Fulton County had
no answers.
The Supreme Court also refused to hear both an original jurisdiction case AND a case by
the President's own team in December which would have ruled on the constitutionality of PA's
mail in ballots done without amending the state constitution.
It wasn't a single speech by Trump just before events unfolded that led to the violence of
January 6 during which five people died. Many of the same people now pointing fingers at Trump
bear responsibility for the tragedy themselves. So, in the spirit of Zola
I accuse the Washington establishment of reducing the concept of democracy itself to little
more than a convenient pretext for foreign invasion of countries that don't align with
America's interests. You've perverted the concept for the average foreigner of target countries
that have seen little more than enduring chaos and destruction borne of ' democracy '.
So why should the average American trust in the notion when you cry about 'democracy' itself
being attacked by a mob?
I accuse the Democratic Party of spending the past four years since Trump was legitimately
elected trying to disenfranchise the near-63 million Americans who cast their ballot in his
favor by portraying them as useful idiots of a foreign power (namely Russia), rather than
people who simply wanted someone in charge who wasn't going to kowtow to the insidious
corruption in Washington.
I accuse the Republican Party of placing its own personal interests over those of the
citizens by enabling – or even cheerleading – Trump's behavior when it risked
becoming a liability for his presidency, for the party, and for the hopes of millions of
average Americans who voted for him.
I accuse Big Tech – specifically, social media giants – of rank hypocrisy. The
more extreme and buzzworthy the comments on your platforms by Trump and his most fervent
supporters, the more money it has made you. And now you have the gall to admonish and blacklist
Trump and his supporters while pretending that it's all such a shock. You played just as much a
role in all of this as they did. Own it. And to clarify, are you in favor of free speech, or
strictly speech that squares with the prevailing political winds and social pressures at any
given time?
I accuse right-leaning ideological talking heads of self-serving pandering to your audience
of consumers – by screaming about unproven 'election fraud', for example – rather
than providing rational analysis and credible information that might have helped to make your
case to a wider audience beyond the handful of radical extremists who didn't exactly need
convincing in the first place.
I accuse left-leaning pundits of hysteria rather than constructive opposition, and reducing
any pushback against your agenda or positions to some form of bigotry.
I accuse the mainstream media of obvious and inherent bias against President Trump from the
very outset of his presidency, which has ultimately served to radicalize his base and further
erode the average American's faith in the important work of the free press.
I accuse the sanitary fascists who emerged over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic and who
acted like anyone prioritizing their own solvency and ability to feed their families over
various, ever-changing restrictions of questionable effectiveness was some kind of terrorist.
Many members of the mob that showed up on Capitol Hill felt that they had little left to lose.
And it's in part because of you.
I accuse Wall Street, and the politicians whom it has purchased through lobbying efforts, of
failing to see how globalization would ultimately disenfranchise the average American worker by
exporting jobs and driving down wages. You, too, contributed to the frustration seen in that
mob that congregated in Washington from the four corners of America.
Finally, I accuse President Donald Trump of failing to grow into his presidency, of allowing
his own ego to get in the way of his promises, of seemingly prioritizing the interests of
friends and associates, and of failing to convert his considerable rhetorical power into
lasting achievements and a legacy in which his voters and supporters could take pride.
Every one of these people hold responsibility for catalyzing the events of January 6. Unless
those who remain standing when the dust settles on this fiasco change their ways, America is in
for a long, rough ride.
This is about the consolidation of power after questionable election; Capitol ransacking is
just a pretext for represssions. If it did not occur they would find another one.
Notable quotes:
"... (5) the term "domestic terrorism" means activities that -- (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended -- (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. ..."
"... Why all the talk about "domestic terrorism"? I suspect it's because people can't stand the idea that the Trump mob could be guilty of nothing more than trespassing. Time reports sadly that there are no laws against domestic terrorism, but lists the charges it wants brought: seditious conspiracy, which carries a 20-year maximum sentence, homicide, assault, interstate travel in aid of racketeering, restricted-area violations, vandalism, and trespassing. ..."
"... The authorities promise to hunt the rioters -- many of whom just walked through an open door -- to the ends of the earth as if they were Osama bin Laden. The contrast with the handling of BLM and antifa rioters is stark. ..."
Joe Biden has the people who took over the Capitol on Jan. 6 figured out. In just two days,
he had them pegged for "a bunch of thugs, insurrectionists, white supremacists, and
anti-Semites, and it's not enough." Not enough? He also said they were "domestic terrorists."
Curiously, there is a federal definition of domestic terrorism, but it isn't a crime. There
is now tremendous pressure to change that, and depending on what kind of law takes shape, there
could be huge implications for dissidents.
For now, this
definition from 18 U.S. Code § 2331 is worth studying:
(5) the term "domestic terrorism" means activities that -- (A) involve acts dangerous to
human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended -- (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to
influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the
conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur
primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
Does this apply to the Capitol takeover? Domestic terrorism must be an illegal act
"dangerous to human life" and meant to influence policy. The Trump supporters wanted to
influence policy alright, but what does "dangerous to human life" mean? The
Michigan Penal Code says it is "that which causes a substantial likelihood of death or
serious injury."
That wouldn't include trespassing, breaking and entering, or even scuffling with the police.
Anyone who may have
killed Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick would meet the definition of a "domestic
terrorist," but the circumstances of his death are still not clear. It may be there wasn't a
single "textbook" domestic terrorist at the Capitol that day. Lefties are gloating
over the death of Ashli Babbitt, but the only thing she did that was "dangerous to human life"
was stop a bullet.
Why all the talk about "domestic terrorism"? I suspect it's because people can't stand the
idea that the Trump mob could be guilty of nothing more than trespassing. Time reports
sadly that there are no laws against domestic terrorism, but lists the charges it wants brought:
seditious conspiracy, which carries a 20-year maximum sentence, homicide, assault, interstate
travel in aid of racketeering, restricted-area violations, vandalism, and trespassing.
Sure enough, the Justice Department has set up a task force
to file sedition and conspiracy charges . The investigation is said to be "one of the most
expansive criminal investigations in the history of the Justice Department." The authorities
promise to hunt the rioters -- many of whom just walked through an open door -- to the ends of
the earth as if they were Osama bin Laden. The contrast with the
handling of BLM and
antifa rioters is stark.
Democrat Rep. Bennie Thompson, who chairs the House Committee on Homeland Security,
has another idea . "Given the heinous domestic terrorist attack on the U.S. Capitol," he
wants everyone involved put on the No-Fly List. Rep. Jason Crow, a member of the House Armed
Services Committee, wants the US Army Secretary to track down and
court martial every soldier who entered the Capitol. A court
martial requires a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, usually for a serious
felony. Police departments in
Virginia ,
Washington , and
Pennsylvania are
scouring their rosters , looking for officers who went to the rally, whether they entered
the Capitol or not. Will they be fired?
Wikipedia describes John McCain's daughter Meghan as a
"columnist, author, and television personality." She wants the rioters sent to Guantanamo :
"They should be treated the same way we treat Al-Qaeda" -- yet another American frustrated by
the lack of a law against domestic terrorism.
... ... ...
... [neoliberal] Lefties were of course
pleased that "white supremacists" can
now officially be "terrorists." This is very important for any potential new law because
the occupation of the Capitol has unleashed a wave of vitriol against "white supremacy," even
though there is no evidence the Trump supporters had the slightest racial motivation. NBC News
ran this
headline : "'Vintage white rage': Why the riots were about the perceived loss of white
power." Politico
tells us "there's a term for what happened at the Capitol this week: 'whitelash'." The
Atlantic
explained that "the Capitol riot was an attack on multiracial democracy." The
Guardian 's
headline was "Insurrection Day: When White Supremacist Terror Came to the US Capitol."
Black Congressman Hank Johnson
told Al Sharpton that the black Capitol policeman who killed Ashli Babbitt had
singlehandedly put down a lynch mob: If he hadn't shot her, "I have no doubt that some of us
who look like me would've been hanging from the railings of the 3rd floor, onto the House
floor, swinging like . . . strange fruit." Nancy Pelosi said that
the people who entered the Capitol "have chosen their whiteness over democracy," whatever that
means.
This perfectly matches the views of Richard Durbin, ranking member on the Senate
Subcommittees for Defense and for the Constitution. In 2019, he introduced the Domestic Terrorism
Prevention Act , which called white supremacy "the most significant domestic terrorism
threat facing the United States." The act was only about 3,000 words but used "white
supremacist" 12 times, "neo-Nazi" six times, "far-right" eight times, and "hate crime" 10
times. It was silent on any other kind of domestic terrorism. Sen. Durbin says he will
reintroduce the bill right away in light of the Capitol takeover.
There is no telling what laws could pass in this fevered environment, but it's important to
note what Mr. Durbin's 2019 bill did and did not do. It did not make domestic terrorism a crime
or authorize the designation of "domestic terrorism organizations," which would mean jailing
Americans as if they were Al-Qaeda members and seizing assets without notice. What it
did
do was set up special offices in the FBI, Justice Department, and Homeland Security "to
analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity and . . . take steps to prevent domestic
terrorism." It's anyone's guess what those "steps" were supposed to be.
The bill also required the three agencies to "review each hate crime incident reported
during the preceding year to determine whether the incident also constitutes a domestic
terrorism-related incident," though it didn't say to what end.
Sen. Durbin loves to quote FBI Director Christopher A. Wray's testimony
before Congress in 2019: "A majority of the domestic terrorism cases that we've investigated
are motivated by some version of what you might call white supremacy . . . ."
However, the bill used the definition of "domestic terrorism" from 18 U.S. Code § 2331
cited above, which is ideologically neutral. That means Black Lives Matter and antifa commit
vastly more "domestic terrorism" than all the "white supremacists," "neo-Nazis," and "far-right
extremists" combined. Anyone who shouts "Defund the police," "Justice for Breonna Taylor,"
"Black lives matter," or even "I can't breathe" is trying to "influence the policy of a
government." If, in that context, someone commits an illegal act "dangerous to human life," he
is a domestic terrorist. Since the
death of George Floyd , there have been countless dangerous-to-human-life acts of arson and
aggravated assault; even attempts to
stop ambulances from bringing wounded officers to emergency rooms. If "white supremacists"
were organizing freeway shutdowns, they would surely count as "dangerous to human
life."
The levels of hypocritical hysteria dominating the corporate airwaves and most electronic
media, together with an even more amplified level among the pro$titicians in the Di$trict of
Corruption means they are scared.
They suddenly feel vulnerable. Are they as vulnerable as the people of Yemen who are being
bombed daily and starvation blockaded by the $audi crime clan with the full. assistance of
those D.C. Pro$titician$? Are they as vulnerable as those half million!!! deliberately
starved Iraqi children whom Madelein Albrietstein declared to be "worth it" in forwarding the
I$raeli agenda?
Could it just simply be that they are themselves guilty of crimes against humanity and in
violation of their oaths to protect the Constitution of the United States from all enemies
foreign and DOMESTIC? The little gal under the streetlight with high heels, short skirt and
low-hanging purse in the midnight hour at least provides a desired service. Can the same be
said for the Pro$titicians on the Hill overlooking Urination'$ Capitol?
As for the media whores and pre$$titute$, being myself a recovering journalist; there is
good reason to believe that I have correctly identified them.
I don't see how it can't be recognized that Trump set-up his own supporters by luring them
to DC.
Going to Wash DC to protest wasn't going to change the vote outcome in Congress and any
fool could anticipate Antifa types would show up (apparently Pelosi, Schumer, McConnell and
DC Mayor were advised they were planning to come and riot. So Trump had to have known
too.)
Now, neither POTUS or Congress members will publicly identify the organized Antifa thug
element. So, Trump supporters, and by extension Repubs, are being widely labeled as "domestic
terrorists'. While Trump releases another video today lecturing about violence which
implicates HIS supporters by no mention of the other elements there.
Congressman Hank Johnson told Al Sharpton that the black Capitol policeman who killed
Ashli Babbitt had singlehandedly put down a lynch mob: If he hadn't shot her, "I have no
doubt that some of us who look like me would've been hanging from the railings of the 3rd
floor, onto the House floor, swinging like . . . strange fruit.
This statement is quite stupid but Johnson has said worse in the past:
During a House Armed Services Committee hearing on March 25, 2010[40] concerning the
U.S. military installation on the island of Guam, Johnson said to Admiral Robert F.
Willard, Commander of U.S. Pacific Command, "My fear is that the whole island will become
so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize", to which Admiral Willard replied,
"We don't anticipate that."
The great thing about language in the 21st century is it means whatever you want it to
mean, sort of like Alice in wonderland. A terrorist is whatever they deem to be a terrorist;
anyone who does not go along with their agenda. "building back better" means repression and
censorship. "the new normal" means global corporate government and the great reset agenda.
"global pandemic" means a plandemic that kills one in a million healthy young people. etc.
Facts and information do not matter to these people; it is 1984. This struggle will be
decided by force, as logical arguments are useless to those who deny the basic axioms of
reality and existence (almost all libtards and most rinos). I think in a way it is a good
thing that things are getting worse for the average middle american. Things will need to get
much worse before they get better as more than half the people are still totally asleep. Of
the minority that are awake, most of us have too much to lose right now . But we need to
organize and prepare to take action soon or we will be bled to death by a thousand cuts as
they have been doing for a while now. What kind of a world will our children inherit if we
stay silent and apathetic?
O MY GOD!
All the discussions around Trump reminded me of Hitler after Stalingrad.
After the defeat at Stalingrad, the Germans waited 2 years for Hitler to use the secret
weapon and win the war. The German army suffered defeat after defeat, the Russian communists
were searching for Hitler's body through Bunkers and the Germans still waited for the
super-secret weapon to save them.
Two months after the election, Trump's team suffered defeat after defeat. Trump is waiting
for jail, but his supporters are convinced that Trump still has a secret weapon with which
will win the election.When you wake up to reality. Trump is a false Messiah and he he doesn't
have a super-secret-weapon.
You have to fight your self for justice and truth and not wait for someoneelse to fight for
you while you button porn, tiktok or chat smalltalk on Facebook.
I can't forget what Mother Teresa said 30 years ago: "Don't wait for a leader because he
won't come. Be your own leaders."
You all are for sure. I just changed my party registration and I'm now a proud Democrat. I
don't want to be denied jobs, loans, transportation, and possibly freedom and life itself for
the sake of a country that has collectively decided to destroy itself.
And that's what false flag with Capitol ransacking accomplished. It fives Clinton/Obama/Biden
clique card blank for suppressing the dissent
This false flag operation like shooting protesters by snipers during Ukrainian Maydan is a
logical end of American Maidan and pursued the same goals -- deposing the current president,
hijacking political power and consolidating it via repressions.
Notable quotes:
"... That is why we are witnessing the fussy, aggressive actions of the Democrats - a ridiculous re-impeachment of the president, who will leave the White House in a week, the most severe censorship and suppression of dissent. There is no need for the real winners of fair elections to behave like that, as they are aware of their legitimacy and are confident in themselves (relying on the real, not imaginary, support of the majority of the population). ..."
From the "Biden Exploits His Capitol Gains" article:
Joe Biden's own language certainly sounded less like a magnanimous winner uniting his
people than like that used by autocrats and dictators to hold onto power, argues Diana
Johnstone.
Diana Johnstone's opinion is quite reasonable. In fact, a "creeping"/"bureaucratic" coup
d'etat took place in the United States. And it wasn't Trump at all, but Biden & Co. The
fact that "Joe Biden's own language sounded like that used by autocrats and dictators to hold
onto power" is further confirmation of this.
If you are in the majority and you win the election honestly, then there is no need to act
the way the Democrats did. The current aggressive rhetoric of Biden (and other Democrats) is
evidence that the elections were stolen/falsified. Biden knows this very well, and therefore
his language is as cruel, irreconcilable and repressive as possible. After the illegitimate
elections, the task is to consolidate own's power and suppress all those who reject what
happened. In fact, this is what happened in Ukraine after the Maidan 2014.
That is why we are witnessing the fussy, aggressive actions of the Democrats - a
ridiculous re-impeachment of the president, who will leave the White House in a week, the
most severe censorship and suppression of dissent. There is no need for the real winners of
fair elections to behave like that, as they are aware of their legitimacy and are confident
in themselves (relying on the real, not imaginary, support of the majority of the
population).
Globalization has made the United States a hollow giant. It has produced an enormous
wealth gap, and this inequality is producing a breakdown in social cohesion. They have faced
crisis before in the form of political polarization, economic hardship and racial tensions,
but the situation now is a combination of every one of the mentioned before amplified by
orders of magnitude by the pandemic.
The power of the MIC, Wall Street and Big Tech along with their MSM minions acting in a
concerted way is the only thing preventing an implosion of the country. Either that or the
notion of "American Exceptionalism" is truly implanted in the hearts and minds of the people,
whether they realize it or not.
So where will 75 million disenfranchised voters – or 88 million Twitter followers
– go?
As it stands, we're deep into Hardcore Class War. The Top of the Scam Gang are in full
control. The remains of "Democracy" have gelled into Mediacracy. Ahead, there's nothing but
ruthless purge, protracted crackdown, censorship, blanket surveillance, smashing of civil
liberties, a single narrative, overarching cancel (in)culture. It gets worse: next week,
this paranoid apparatus merges with the awesome machinery of the United States Government
(USG).
The next question for 2021 then, concerns that old adage: 'Beware not to win too
much'. It can be a mistake to corner your adversaries to having nothing to lose. The
Blue state has ousted Trump; and Blue has taken everything across 'the board', and are
ready to
implement the 'Re-set' – the ultimate subjugation of Red by main force, achieved
by the preponderance of wealth, ruling institutional leverage, and military power. A social
'woke' revolution, as well as a political transformation. The full outcome would likely
reconstitute the constitutional order, in ways unrecognizable to most Americans today.
But will Red America succumb from exhaustion, or lack of leadership; or, on the other
hand, might it find the energy to revitalise 'their' Republic? We shall see – a big
question whose ramifications might make the EU élites particularly nervous. Of
course Blue now possesses force majeure. But there is another old adage: 'No
passionate, partisan assessment has any value, save to inflame' – and Big Tech and
the MSM's censorship and accompanying humiliation of Trump may turn him a martyr, and make
the spirit of defiance all the stronger.
From outside the melee, it is easy to define the serious issues that should dominate
political debate in the United States. But instead of that, we hear a torrential exchange
of insults. The establishment elite cannot stoop to exchange viewpoints with populists
denounced as deplorable, racist, misogynist, white supremacist, fascist and now even
"terrorist."
The populists' unfocused denunciation of the elite describes Wall Street Democrats as
"socialists" and veers off into accusations of genocidal vaccination campaigns, occult
pedophile rites and Satanism. Instead of anything resembling a clear political division,
America is increasingly split by blind, burning mutual hatred.
What American political life needs is not more censorship, but the self-censorship of
reason. That is very far away.
Its not that the election was stolen. But that choice was stolen. The MAGA team wanted to
vote Trump but then were obliged to vote for Repugnants. Not forced to vote down ticket and
so a sufficient few voted Dimratss.
2022 and 24 will be different imo. There will be many more non 'elite party'
candidates.
The MAGA crowd will have a presidential candidate in 2024, likely it won't be Donald as
the Dimratss are ripping the wheels off his cart right now. Maybe Ivanka, maybe another
billionaire smarty. in 2022 they will also be running hard to win a Congressional or Senate
seat as well and accusing the repugnant incumbents of treachery.
The progressives might, could, perhaps run a workers party or some such and they too will
have a presidential candidate and contest the Congressional and Senate positions. It will be
interesting to see how the first iteration pans out. They too will have lots to flog the
dimwitted party bosses with.
One thing you can bet on is that the Dimratss will do nothing good.
to me, Diana Johnstone offers the most meaningful and insightful analysis of the three,
examining many of the threads of these incredibly complex times, including the scandalously
under-educated and under-organized masses in the USA, the truly frightful authoritarianism of
Old Joe and his tribe of Know-Little Democrats, and what I consider to be the neo-fascist
tendencies of the Techo-Overlords who together with the other Economic Elites truly run the
country. These overlords are just beginning their censorship, purges and imprisonments.
"....The oligarchic nature of the American War Party is revealed by the haste with which
privately owned social media enterprises silence dissent – even the still acting
President of the United States. Indeed, who really rules the United States?.....
Trump managed to appeal to millions of discontented Americans without offering any
coherent practical program to replace the War Party with policies capable of transforming the
nation into a haven of peace and prosperity. His confusion mirrored the ideological confusion
of a population scandalously undereducated in history and political ideas....."
I fully expect the neo-cons and neo-liberal interventionists and war mongers who are
packed into the Old Joe administration to launch a new war in the Middle East (or even
re-ingnite an old war? perhaps one against Syria) soon after taking office.... And for any
protests to be denounced as rioting and terrorism - Not, mind you, that any Democrats will
ever protest any foreign war, drone attacks, subversion or coup d'etat initiated by their
Party, god forbid!
Keep your eye on the ball, and the ball is Class...... Along with wealth and real power in
the country; where and how the ruling class maintains all its incredible advantages
to maintain the Potemkin village facade of a democracy, they have to maintain the facade
of legit elections.... as k c points out - 2000 and 2004 looked pretty dicey already... but
keeping the illusion up is important.. maybe one of the issues that most challenges the
powers that be, and i include the dem party in this - is the fact that trump and the repubs
have challenged these election results... people can say it is all bullshit, but one has to
question it with the use of computers to generate the result... i am not confident in this
approach myself, but i don't like in the usa.. regardless, i am sure many on the inside
trying to maintain this facade of democracy are enraged that trump would question the
legitimacy of it... good for him that he did!
KC, you wrote:
"All of this having been said, I have not been given one single credible account of
widespread or even small scale coordinated vote rigging by the Democrats in the presidential
election."
If there was any vote rigging done to make sure Trump lost, do you actually think it would
have been done by the Democrats? If the Deep State, or the financial oligarchy behind the
Deep State, had decided that Trump absolutely had to go, wouldn't they have given the job of
vote rigging to the experts at manipulating elections at the CIA or some other part of the
Intelligence community?
I don't pretend to know whether there was any anti Trump vote rigging, but I think any
discussion of whether or not it was even possible needs to start with a correct
identification of who might plausibly have done it.
Is there anything more pathetic than competition between two political mafias hiding as some
sort of disagreement over principle?
Notable quotes:
"... Absolutely his instinct to rebalance the economic relationship with China was correct. But he's too stupid to do it in a way that actually benefits or improves the US long term. Every once in a while with him there was hint of a good instinct but he never followed through because his base instincts always win out. ..."
"... The cries of censorship are asinine. Real censorship of diverging opinions was accomplished decades ago. Banning Donald trump from twitter isn't censorship. They didn't ban the POTUS account (they did delete tweets when he tried to use it), they banned his personal account because he's an asshole who broke the rules. Republicans have been telling me about the sanctity of property my whole life. Now they change their minds? ..."
It's all just farts in a jar. The trajectory was set decades ago and the political
oligarchy and gerontocracy aren't going to let go of that trajectory. Trump was only a
"populist" insofar as it was a means for him to be popular. In reality, he's a dishonest,
craven asshole. If he was a populist he would have responded to Covid way differently. What
he is, however, is a nationalist. Those are dangerous because they don't think clearly.
Absolutely his instinct to rebalance the economic relationship with China was correct.
But he's too stupid to do it in a way that actually benefits or improves the US long term.
Every once in a while with him there was hint of a good instinct but he never followed
through because his base instincts always win out.
The cries of censorship are asinine. Real censorship of diverging opinions was
accomplished decades ago. Banning Donald trump from twitter isn't censorship. They didn't ban
the POTUS account (they did delete tweets when he tried to use it), they banned his personal
account because he's an asshole who broke the rules. Republicans have been telling me about
the sanctity of property my whole life. Now they change their minds?
The empire is in terminal decline. Trump doesn't change it. Biden doesn't change it. Who
controls Congress doesn't change it. Because all of them are beholden to the declining empire
and/or they believe in America's myths (they are nationalists). A failed color revolution run
by people who don't want to accept an election result just says real loud that the empire is
falling.
@pretzelattack "alaff, there's no evidence the election was stolen"
Why do people treat this like a court of law with a presumption of innocence? - "if there
is no proof of wrongdoing, it must have been fair and honest".
Suppose someone demanded that you prove the election was honest? Could you do it? I know I
couldn't.
It's not hard to imagine a system where you could prove that, however. It would require voter
ID's, much stricter chain of custody for ballots and the ability for a voter to check how
their vote was recorded and challenge it, if necessary. This is all perfectly possible
technologically. If I can return something to a store 6 months after I bought it without a
receipt and have them look up the visa purchase, we should be able to do this. The reason, of
course, is that the political parties don't really want honest elections.
The whole thing reminds me a bit of that line in "The Sting" - "what do you expect me to
do? challenge him in front of everyone for cheating better than me?"
Where I'm going is this: why _should_ I believe the election was honest? I simply don't
know if it was, or wasn't. There won't be real confidence in elections until we provide
better means of validating the results that are available to everyone. Simply saying "there
was no evidence of fraud" won't be enough.
ZD commenter goes after neoliberal Dems with the force of sarcasm...
Notable quotes:
"... "Crucifixion was invented by the Persians in 300 BC, adapted by the Romans in 100 BC to crucify Jesus Christ, and extensively used by Democrats in 2021..." ..."
If CON is the opposite of PRO then does that mean:
The opposite of Congress is Progress?
The opposite of Constitution is Prostitution?
CJgipper 4 minutes ago
I hope they spend the next 4 years on this impeachment hoax.
I'm pretty okay with the laws as they are, certainly don't want these monkeys monkeying
with them.
Handful of Dust 6 hours ago remove link
"Crucifixion was invented by the Persians in 300 BC, adapted by the Romans in 100 BC to
crucify Jesus Christ, and extensively used by Democrats in 2021..."
Dangerclose 5 hours ago
The "illegal entry" was starting before Trump even spoke. He was twenty minutes late for
his speaking time. Antifa was rousing up the crowd well before Trump spoke.
NAV 4 hours ago (Edited)
And so they're impeaching Trump because he won the election. And hunting down his
supporters for voting for him and participating in Washington's largest rally to show their
support for him and America. And because they expect a no-show for Biden's inauguration,
they've created an armed insurrection scare as an excuse for why no one attended.
And all we have to do is not fight the noose that already is around our necks.
"We're going walk down to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our brave senators, and
congressmen and women."
"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to
peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."
I don't see where Trump encourages anyone to go INTO the Capitol. Nonetheless , the
Capitol Visitor Center is open to visitors from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through
Saturday except for Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, New Year's Day and on Inauguration Day.
Capitol Visiting Hours - Open
to the Public..
* Ten Republicans have broken ranks and voted for impeachment: Rep. Liz Cheney (WY) Rep.
Jaime Herrera Beutler (WA) Rep. John Katko (NY) Rep. Adam Kinzinger (IL) Rep. Fred Upton (MI)
Rep. Dan Newhouse (WA) Rep. Peter Meijer (MI) Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (OH) Rep. Tom Rice (SC) and
Rep. David Valadao (CA).
House Democrats are leading the charge on a Wednesday vote to impeach President Trump on one
count of incitement of insurrection, after protesters were allowed into the US Capitol building
last week through an open door - calmly walking inside
before proceeding to take selfies and ransack lawmakers' offices.
The article of impeachment accuses Trump of "willfully inciting violence against the
government of the United States" in violation of his oath and duty. Once it passes, which we
expect it will, Trump will be the first US president in history to be impeached twice.
...
More via Bloomberg :
The timing could complicate Biden's efforts to get cabinet officials approved by the
Senate since lawmakers would be occupied by an impeachment trial.
But Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has raised the possibility of invoking a 2004
emergency session law to convene a trial this week, although such a move would require the
consent of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Regardless of whether he is convicted in the Senate, a second impeachment would further
stain a presidency that has culminated in a frightening assault on the storied center of the
American democracy. It also opened fissures in the Republican Party that portends a power
struggle over its future.
The New York Times reported that McConnell has told associates he is privately pleased
with the impeachment, calculating that it will make it easier to purge the party of Trump's
influence.
Numerous Republicans, however, argued that impeaching Trump would only worsen divisions in
the country.
Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina, who was elected in November, said impeachment
"throws gasoline on the fire."
"Both parties need to take a time out and take a deep breath" Mace told reporters at the
Capitol. "We need to have a peaceful transition of power and start over."
Mace was not among the 138 Republicans who voted on Jan. 6 to reject Biden's Electoral
College win in at least one state even after the mob seeking to overturn the election had
stormed the building. Many of them also made pleas for unity.
Check back for updates...
play_arrow
HRH of Aquitaine 2.0 6 hours ago
John B. Wells had a guest on his show, a new member of Congress, who was walking around
and saw a flare go off from the Capital roof. Once that happened he said all hell broke
loose. It wasn't an accident. The whole thing, inside was staged. As is the installation of
metal detectors.
Notice there is NO focus on the economy, on Covid, on unemployment, on ANYTHING of value
to the citizens. Its all about the progressive elites little fantasy world of power. The
progressive supporters need to realize the incoming regime is all about the elites and there
will be no crumbs for anyone. Why is it democrat voters can learn from their ownership of
cities, there is NOTHING for the little guy but bloviating speeches and bullshyyytt. All of
the money goes to entrenched party insiders and their hangers on.
Xi the Pooh 6 hours ago (Edited) remove link
The capital police opened the damn barricade and let them in!!
AND ITS TIME FOR TRUMP TO GO ON THE OFFENSE! NO MORE BEING A GIANT PYSIE. START
DECLASSIFYING DEEP STATE DOCUMENTS, AND PARDON ASSANGE AND SNOWDEN ASAP!!
Solzhenitsyn, after coming to the West, and observing it first hand, observed that the
West had lost its civic courage, and that such a loss presaged societal catastrophe.
Lack of courage is not necessarily a hindrance to sudden displays of viciousness.
The specter of politicians cowering under their desks on Jan. 6th preceded by the Supreme
Court displaying no backbone in support of their Constitutional authority and duty pertaining
to massive election fraud, in the wake of lower courts' dishonor on the issue, is now joined
by a general piling on, of vindictiveness. Not just Democrats and mass media and the 'woke'
universe: Republican rats scurry to abandon the Trumpian ship and hurl departing insults at
the Captain.
For four years Trump was subjected to non-stop Establishment and mass media venom, but
leading up to the election things got only crazier. A couple of weeks prior to the election
on Nov 3rd, , for example, a large number of remarkably successful 'dissident' citizen
journalists were purged from major mass media platforms, undermining both their reach and
their incomes. Brazen censorship was deployed in this and many other ways.
Trump derangement syndrome – a remarkable and to me mysterious achievement –
already widely inflicting countless 'educated' people in many lands, seems to have been
somehow energized to new heights of hysteria and venom after the stolen election: Trump
supporters are now to be fired, re educated, put on no fly lists, arrested, and otherwise
attacked and removed: they are residual evidence of the great stain upon America's glorious
history, or upon the human race itself, perhaps: one Donald J. Trump.
But here is the curious fact: Trump received more votes, if the votes were counted fairly,
than any other President in American history. In the aftermath of relentless media hostility,
bias, misrepresentation, attacks, etc, Trump became arguably among the most popular
Presidents in American history.
So what does that tell us? Among other things, that the near unanimous mass media effort
to deprecate Trump failed spectacularly with tens of millions of Americans: the person who
mass media rigorously demonized for four years actually won the real election in a landslide.
And the person who actually won the election had over the last four years directed continual
teasing contempt at the 'fake new' industry/complex, and in my opinion easily holds the title
of global champion when it comes to bringing widespread attention to mass media
disinformation and corruption.
So while there is a great deal to be concerned about, and many pitfalls, from my
perspective there has been an enormous positive sea change in the vast and growing
'peasantry' of America. The deplorable population has grown over the last four years, and
they have learned a lot, and endured a lot. They have seen many of their hopes 'blown away in
the vicious wind of corruption and cowardice'. They have been locked down and inconvenienced
and frightened and impoverished by the fake news propagated dripping-with-evil-intent
COVID-19 operation. But for all that, many millions will be more resolute, as well as wiser
still.
We don't know how the story unfolds, but as far as I can see it's far from over, and the
plot will involve the will power of millions in response to the illegitimate power now much
more starkly on display, and wielded by far fewer numbers.
Have to agree with Glenn Greenwald that the Capitol invasion was NOT a "coup" or
"insurrection" as pushed by the same people who ignored the violence and destruction in the
George Floyd protests ( https://greenwald.substack.com/p/violence-in-the-capitol-dangers-in-67f
). While not a benign chanting on a sidewalk, the violation of the Capitol by Deplorables was
minor compared to what happened to other federal monuments and statues all summer, and in
line with both groups' First Amendment right "to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances". And while NO ONE was shot to death by police in the George Floyd protests
(estimated at over 10 million protesters) many lost eyes to flash bangs and beanbags and many
were hospitalized from tear gas.
Obviously the Saker is not American or he would know, as Neoliberal Global Elite George W
Bush put it: "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face. It's just a goddamned piece of
paper!"
Maybe SCOTUS still pays some attention, but Congress creates their own hysterical deranged
Narratives and as Karl Rove said: "in what we call the reality-based community," most
Americans "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality."
But that's no longer true for Congress. "That's not the way the world really works anymore,"
he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while
you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other
new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's
actors and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
Washington has long had a political culture of impunity that permits the abuses and crimes
of the powerful to go unpunished, and the lack of accountability for our many foreign policy
failures is well-known. As a general rule, politicians are rarely held accountable for what
they do, and presidents are even less likely to face consequences for their outrages.
the [manipulated] public is demanding accountability right away. According to at least two
surveys released in the last few days, most Americans
fault the president for the Capitol attack. According to one poll, 56%
want Trump removed from office before Biden's inauguration. Even if this weren't what most
Americans support, it is what defending the Constitution and the rule of law requires.
And besides, they were actually part of an overall coordinated left-wing movement all
last year (mostly using Covid as the justification for instituting the most insecure and
fraudulent election system in history) designed to undermine the election and enable mass
vote fraud, which constitutes material participation in an effort to destroy the
constitution and overthrow the truly elected leaders of the government.
This is nonsense. Total, unmitigated hogwash. The BLM movement and the attendant voter
registration movements were exactly what they were, an attempt to bring sharp attention to
racial justice and an attempt to bring people to the polls to vote. Full stop. While I
vehemently disagree with the elements of BLM that rioted and damaged property, there is no
comparison between the two movements.
So you think protesting the handling of a suspicious election was "an attempt to destroy
the Constitution"? Well, you get points for knowing how to spell, if not think clearly.
In what specific part of the President's speech did he "incite the mob"? By telling them
to go peacefully protest? By telling them to cheer on the Senators and Representatives
raising objections? By telling them to make people proud?
Trump literally gave a speech filled with insane lies about election fraud and told them
to go to the Capitol to stop the steal. His personal lawyer bellowed there will be "trial
by combat". Trump advisor and bedding impresario Mike Lindell talk about civil war. Saying
"peaceful" once isn't a magic spell that absolves one of responsibility. If it was, Michael
Corleone would be as innocent as a babe being baptized.
None of this would have happened without Trump's leadership. Whipping up a mob against
Congress is the only thing he's focused on for an extended period of time in his
presidency
-----
As for the riots this summer, I also believe that any rioters should be removed from the
office of the president of the United States.
Yes, there is. In what specific part of the President's speech did he "incite the mob"?
By telling them to go peacefully protest?
Probably the parts where he told the crowd that they had to "fight like hell,"
then the part where he said if they "don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a
country anymore" , then saying they had to "stop the steal" and that if they
didn't they would have an "illegitimate president." The latter claim of course being
a bald-faced lie.
But what happened in the capitol last week was no uglier than what has been happening in
this country for years, virtually every time the left gets it protest wheels turning.
Yes it was uglier.
Attacking businesses ≠ attacking police stations ≠ attacking court houses ≠
attacking State Capitols ≠ attacking The Capitol ≠ threatening to lynch
the VP and Members of Congress
If you're going to make a false equivalence like this, why should anyone take you
seriously? Yes, threatening to upend our democracy by advocating the death of our elected
officials is a lot bigger of an issue than a Target in Minneapolis being looted or
burned. It's possible for both things to be bad or unwelcome outcomes, but for one (the
Trump insurrection) to be far, far, far, far worse.
How about burning down entire sections of cities, dragging innocent civilians out of
their cars, rioting, looting, firebombing, raping, murdering....all part and parcel with
conduct we watched go on for months.
Hilariously, Trump pardons war criminals that literally have done all these things, and
you pretend like you have the moral high ground.
But he incited a riot. He deserves to be impeached. He deserves to be barred from running
for office. He deserves to be deplatformed.
The funniest thing about this is that you could ignore the riot and he still
deserves to be impeached . Did you forget when the little impeachable phone call he
made to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger? God knows how many more similar
phone calls he's made over the past four years that no one was smart enough to record and
leak.
who went around and raised money to bail out rioters from jail so they could go out and
riot again have been fired
They primary reason to paying for bail is because we have an unequal and unjust cash
bail system that benefits to middle/upper-class and has unequal impact on the poor. Get
real.
Funny you leftist didn't mind when left-wing scum occupied the Wisconsin capitol for 40
days in 2011, or attacked and occupied Senate offices during the Kavanaugh hearings, or
breached Capitol security barriers during the "Women's March, etc etc.
and where were you when the 'sovereign citizens' occupied government property in
Oregon?
'what's that got to do with me", you ask. Whataboutism is not relevant, neither about Bundy
in Oregon or those that illegally occupied a state capitol. Maga insurgents occupied the
National Capitol, calling for death to the Vice President, stealing government property
including potentially classified information in order to support the overturn of the US
government.
I've deleted my prior comment. It has become obvious that TAC is dominated by leftists
and fraudulent Conservatives who are perfectly complicit with the double standards and
hypocrisy being imposed on our society. Enjoy your return to the Bob Dole/John McCain
party. Enjoy never winning another Presidential election.
Yeah, this Jesus fella clearly didn't know about the absolute necessity of flying
private jets to avoid being surrounded by demons
https://www.foxnews.com/us/...
There was a narrow gate in the Jerusalem wall known as "the eye of the needle." Rabbi
Jesus said it was easier for a camel to get through that gate than for a rich man to get
into the Kingdom. Since Marx didn't come along for another eighteen hundred years or so,
"Marxist" is a counter-factual label to put on him.
Enjoy your return to the Bob Dole/John McCain party. Enjoy never winning another
Presidential election.
Right, 'cause Trump was so good at it that he lost the popular vote twice and when that
also led to him losing the Presidency he sabotaged his own party's possibility of winning
the Senate and subsequently incited an insurgency against Congress.
I'm sure that's the sensible path forward every conservative should want to follow...
...is what I'd say if I wanted to see the GOP completely annihilate itself. So it's what I
say.
Yeah, Donald Trump, such a big winner: two-time loser in the popular vote and now loser
in the electoral college too; leader of the effort to discourage Republicans in Georgia
from voting, thereby securing dominance in the senate for the Democratic Party. Tell me
again how many times a Republican presidential candidate has won the popular vote in the
past thirty years. Oh, right: a grand total of once (GWB, 2004).
It's really a question of choosing your losers: do you want losers who can recognize
reality and serve their country, or losers who live in narcissistic fantasies of grandeur
and serve only themselves?
As a business decision, it's not a great plan for a conservative paper to go
marxist.
You lose your customer base - and your marxist fans soon lose interest as they have so many
other options.
It's like a church that tries to be hip and cool and fun. People don't go to church for
that.
They can stay home and watch tv for that. Hip-cool-fun churches close down.
There is one GREAT thing about TAC.
It's the only marxist site that permits sane people to comment (using disqus). Try and find
another one.
Their 'conservative' pretense requires them to tolerate a non-marxist presence.
Spot on. TAC in the last few months has shown its true colors and is rapidly going the
way of NRO, long the flagship of the cucked grifter pseudo-right.
Good riddance, TAC. Though I'm sure that, like NR, they'll still find plenty of useful
idiot donors to keep the grift going for a while. They'll try hard now to pivot to being
the "conservative opposition" now that Biden-Harris-Pelosi-Schumer will be fully in charge
and they don't have to pretend to kinda-sorta be on the same side as the President anymore
with Trump gone. Nothing the grifter right likes better than being the "loyal opposition,"
always losing, but always grifting.
After all, what would the likes of Rod Dreher complain about if the right ever actually
won and put a stop to everything he's been complaining about and warning of for years? I
think his psychology couldn't take actual victory. Soft-totalitarianism? It's here, and
it's not soft. But no matter, better to be the "opposition," and issue dire warnings, and
accept Big Tech-Woke Capital censorship of the public square, deplatforming of dissenters
from financial and social media services, etc., than support icky Trump and actually score
some policy victories (waging war on racist CRT trainings, being the most objectively
pro-life President ever, cutting down on illegal immigration, not starting any new wars for
the perpetual war machine military-industrial complex etc., etc. How long until Biden and
the new Secretary of Defense (sic) from Raytheon start a new war somewhere? I put the
over-under at 6 months) .
fighting over DOMA while Bush and the rest of the corrupt psychopaths start a war with
Iraq because "They tried to kill my dad!"
fighting over wedding cakes and podiums while Pelosi and the rest of these corrupt
psychopaths start a war with China because "Shut up and die, white supremacist deplorable
racist cannon fodder."
how much more hatred can the rulers have for the ruled before something snaps?
so if they don't agree with you, they are 'fraudulent' conservatives? No wonder you
think that if your guy didn't win, then the election was fraudulent.
For some reason this small publication (circulation 5,000) attracts a lot of leftists
and obnoxious libertarians. Go read the comment section at Reason if you want to see toxic.
It begs the question who reads TAC and what good is it if no one on the right is
listening?
seems to me that folks that want to hear responsible, grounded conservative viewpoints
read TAC. That perhaps is why when articles or comments veer off into conspiracy theories
and Qanon BS, that commenters don't always have good things to say.
"...it is likely that there will be further attempts to sabotage and wreck the republic
in the coming years."
There certainly will be, you got that part right anyway, even if the rest of your screed
is pure...what's the word du jour of your incoming stolen president - malarky! The incoming
marxist regime will do everything it can to wreck our republic in the next four years &
establish a one-party communist-style government. They must be stopped.
There was no incitement last Wed., or prior to that, on the part of the duly elected
President Trump anymore than there was any 'Russian conspiracy' or 'Ukranian quid pro quo'
in previous phony impeachment hoaxes. The only "incitement" came after patriotic protestors
were allowed into the Capitol building by guards during the mostly peaceful protest &
then the Republican/Democrat establishment & fake news tried to incite popular opinion
against the President & his supporters with wild accusations & unfounded
denunciations like this one. It's true, of course, that "Washington has long had a
political culture of impunity that permits the abuses and crimes of the powerful to go
unpunished"; which is why Biden was nominated to "win" a rigged election despite his
family's unchecked corruption while previously in office which shall go unpunished &
unimpeached. Just like rioters & looters & assailants have gone unpunished in last
year's Democrat insurrections in major cities around the country. It's not Ted Cruz who
authored those civil disturbances but it's true that we shouldn't put those egregious
events, or the stolen election, behind us, we must continue to demand accountability, even
if it means more division. And we must demand accountability for Ashli Babbitt - not a
dangerous criminal like George Floyd - who was murdered by Capitol police. Of course,
deadly Democrats & rabid RINO's will continue to try & incite hatred against us but
75 million deplorables aren't going to just give in to you.
The videos I saw showed prolonged battles at the barriers, plus scenes of police
officers being dragged down steps and beaten with flag poles plus another instance of
someone throwing a fire extinguisher at a crowd of cops.
Also a lot of broken windows.
Funny to see an alternative reality being constructed in real time.
To demand accountability for the Capitol riot while glorifying six months of
insurrection, violence and destruction can only have one outcome - massive intensification
of the culture war.
The chasm between marxism and civilisation is vast and unbridgeable.
We should accept that, and stop the bomb throwing. It's pointless.
There is only one way forward: a peaceful partition - or at the very least, a loose
federation, as in the Articles of Confederation, that allows for a common defence and
foreign policy.
The Left ALWAYS uses the vices, flaws, shortcomings, imperfections of their enemies as
justification for their own cosmically horrific crimes.
Look at one of their popular arguments in favour of abortion: "If you guys are not willing
to support the creation of socialist utopia which will provide for this child from cradle
to grave, then I have every right to brutally hack him apart. So there!" This is marxist
logic.
You talk about slavery. Look at what The American Left have done to blacks. Degradation,
de-humanisation - reducing them to livestock on bleak, squalid, lawless urban vote
plantations. The West was the civilisation that ended slavery - which had been
universal.
Homophobia? Look at what The American Left has done to homosexuals. Encouraged them to live
empty hedonistic lifestyles in which their whole identity is built around a particular sex
practise - which many of them don't even like apparently, judging by the amount of drugs
they need to take.
Heresy trials? Stalin used to kill more people before breakfast every morning than the
Spanish Inquisition executed in its entire three centuries of existence. On the first day
after the Roe v Wade decision, the US abortion industry slaughtered more innocent humans
than the total number of Inquisition victims.
Rotten boroughs were actually benign because the representatives from those boroughs had
almost no power compared to what modern politicians have. They were a symbolic statement
that the State was not important and it should not be a significant presence in a free,
rule-of-law society. "It should be left to rot." They provided an argument against
expanding the power of the State.
Well let's put that to the test. Do you believe that the election was stolen from Trump
and that he actually won a "sacred landslide" (his words), or do you believe Biden is the
rightful victor in the election?
We are supposed to pretend there was no fraud because the Media stamps and shrieks and
rants and raves and threatens to ruin peoples' lives? That only deepens and hardens the
suspicion.
Just look at the circumstances of election night. Most murder cases are solved on
circumstantial evidence alone. If that were a court case, the jury would have returned a
guilty verdict in five minutes. The statistical aberrations and the mysterious overnight
activities are just too bizarre.
We all saw that. Nobody is disputing that part.
Then there were mountains of material evidence and testimony rejected. Rejected by whom? By
the Media-State and courts on behalf of their candidate.
If you have a football game - red team v blue team - you should decide it by the score.
You should not allow the owner of the blue team to decide who the winner is, and the
referee should not be a member of one of the teams.
The only "unbridgable chasm" is that Empire is unhappy his side lost the last election,
and was not successful in overturning it, now he wishes to take his ball and go home.
And is now demanding that he be provided with a "home" to go to.
Had Trump won re-election, of course, he'd be demanding that America's coastal urban
areas submit to political dominion by their betters in the heartland.
Lots of people got arrested at the BLM protests. But you know, the "violence and
destruction" was mostly visited against fast-food restaurants and sports apparel stores.
Looting the Capitol, attacking Congress, and threatening to lynch the Vice President is
just a little bit of a different kettle of fish.
The real accountability needs to be with an insane Congress pursuing wholly unjustified
25th Amendment declarations and yet another groundless impeachment. What this country needs
to make its failing and corrupt institutions accountable is not more liberalism and
Frenchist procedural BS and worshiping at "temples of democracy," but a real Caesar or
Augustus...or to use more recent examples, a Franco or Pinochet.
A few dozen people (including Antifa agents provocateur) invited in by cops who opened
gates and doors, larking about taking selfies, doing almost no damage, is hardly an
"attack," "insurrection", or "domestic terrorism." A real attack or insurrection would have
involved hostages, demands, and real violence, including burning this alleged "sacred
temple of democracy" down to the ground (the only real violence was by a clearly racist
black supremacist cop who shot an unarmed white woman in the face - the left assumes all
white cops who shot black suspects are white supremacist racists, so I'm doing them the
courtesy of doing the same with their scum cop;the story of the one cop who died outside
the building has been debunked as not having been the result of any violence against him by
Trump supporters or anyone at all).
There will be no real right-wing movement worthy of the name in this country until
cucked Conservative Inc types like Larison stop simping for liberalism and playing into the
hands of the left.
Yeah that's the real problem here isn't it... Congress calling for Pence to start the
25th process. What a travesty. Not the riot, not the deaths, the call to use an actual
Constitutional process. There is something seriously wrong with you.
Someday this whole thing is going to go down in the history books just like the Salem
Witch Trials as evidence of the fragility of the human pysche, and its capacity for mass
delusion
Yes it's a case study in all sorts of really disturbing human characteristics, from the
propagandists to the sheep that have consumed it. It's easy to see how the German people
fell in line so quickly, particularly because of their propensity and belief in order. This
period will be studied similarly.
Should the Capitol building be the Forbidden City or the Great Hall of the People?
Should the canaille be kept out of sight & out of mind? Is there a substantial
difference between TAC and Salon or New York Magazine?.
I find all this talk of holding the capital protesters accountable hypocritical and
preposterous. Is there a full moon? Have people gone mad?
-Changing state constitutions by judicial decree or executive order by the governor should
be corrected and those people should be held accountable. The judge should be disbarred.
The governor should be impeached.
-Fraud in elections should be prosecuted and isnt
-open borders, human trafficking, drug trafficking, child-sex trafficking, cross border
gang activity, criminal acts by non-citizens and illegals should be prosecuted and
arent
-The Chinese Peoples Liberation Army and the Chinese Communist Party have infiltrated the
Democratic Party. Bribery, treason, sedition, corruption, using family members to hide
payoffs, buyoffs, pay for play access to the Congress or White House, (Pelosi, Schumer,
Feinstein, Swalwell, Obama, Clinton, Biden, etc), inviting known Chinese Spies to work for
you in the Congress (Feinstein, Boxer, Swalwell) never held accountable
-deleting 30,000 emails and destroying cell phones, PDAs, laptops, with
hammers....bleachbit a secret hidden server in the basement of the Clinton house in
Chappaqua never held accountable
-Antifa/BLM killing cops, barricading them in police precincts and setting the police
precincts on fire in an attempt to burn police officers alive never held accountable
-Antifa/BLM perpetrations of arson, vandalism, violent assault, harassment, traffic
obstruction, murder, domestic terrorism never held accountable
-Big Tech, Social Media, Main Stream Media sensationalizing the news, using algorithms to
censor and bias news reporting, delisting people, etc never held accountable.
-Joe Biden and Hunter Biden were being paid off by Russia while accusing Trump of being
compromised by Russia even though it has yet to be proven that Trump has had any
relationship other than professional with a foreign country. The list goes on and on and on. Why the selective outrage over the capital
protesters and no outrage over democratic sedition, treason and corruption which
compromises our nations constitutional republic to a far greater extent than anything Trump
did. Show me the standard of morals, ethics and enforcement of the law is fair, objective
and equally applied then perhaps I will have some sympathy for your selective outrage. The
democrats are like the hypocrit who condemns everyone else watching pornography while they
sit home and watch it.
Here is the summarized timeline of what we know so far:
Trump abruptly fires Mark Esper and replaces him with counter and domestic terrorism
expert Christopher C. Miller, who installs a cadre of military and counterterrorism
strategists with deep ties to Israel and whose experience includes being required reading for
the IDF, framing Palestinians for terrorism against Israelis, and involvement in the Q Anon
intelligence psyop. Thus, a tiger team of experts in the fields of domestic terror (Miller),
military strategy (MacGregor), gay ops (Tata), and psyops (Watnick) had been quickly formed
in the wake of Trump's election loss.
The rally on the National Mall had been planned for weeks, with Trump first announcing it
on Twitter on December 18th.
Trump, Don Jr., and Giuliani used a rally on the mall, in conjunction with an endless
parade of plan-trusts from Q Anon, and along with Trump supporters in Congress, pundits, and
grifters, to whip up rally goers into a march on the Capitol that they themselves said they
would lead, but instead returned to the White House to watch the events unfold on TV.
Capitol security was inexplicably limited to a skeleton crew of Capitol Police officers
and no other law enforcement or military. No additional backup was requested in the weeks
leading up to the event.
On the day of the rally, Capitol Police mounted some resistance, but ultimately opened
barricades and doors giving the implied consent for entry.
There was no ANTIFA presence or any other "left-wing" activist groups to engage the
protestors at the rally.
When backup was requested after the "breach" of the Capitol had already occurred, it was
initially denied by Christopher C. Miller who sat atop the chain of command, with authority
delegated to Miller by Trump, that directly controlled deployment of the D.C. National
Guard.
Miller also prohibited the District's guardsmen from receiving ammunition or riot gear,
interacting with protesters unless necessary for self-defense, sharing equipment with local
law enforcement, or using Guard surveillance and air assets without the defense secretary's
explicit sign-off.
Blame has landed on the Capitol Police, House and Senate security, D.C. Mayor Muriel
Bowser, and just about everywhere else except the Pentagon.
Who ultimately made the call to deploy the National Guard was intentionally obfuscated in
the hours after the event, the chain of command was seldom mentioned as it clearly fell to
Secretary of Defense Miller.
What we don't know yet:
Why D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser only deployed a skeleton crew of Capitol Police and made no
requests for backup.
Why Capitol Police opened barricades and doors of the Capitol and if there was an order
given to stand down.
So far, it seems abundantly clear that Trump's supporters were "set up" for the
unprecedented totalitarian crackdown currently unfolding at a pace no one could have predicted.
Based on a preponderance of the evidence, it is not possible to conclude anything else. The
only matter up for debate at this point is the degree of complicity of those involved in
leading tens of thousands of patriotic American citizens to lose their freedom – possibly
forever – and in some cases, their lives.
Mass protests generally have two distinct but intertwined goals: 1) to "make a statement,"
and 2) to inflict a cost. To state the obvious, mass protests occur because a group of people
are unhappy about something, and they want something to change. Change only occurs, in a large
bureaucratic nation like ours, if a loud "message" is conveyed, or if the price of non-change
becomes too high. If thousands of Trump voters are mad as hell because they believe the
election was stolen, and if they want to protest, they can either make their message heard and
then hope for the best (not much hope there), or they can attempt to punish the thieves
-- that is, make them incur some cost for their malfeasance.
What did the mob achieve on Wednesday? We already knew their message -- Trump won the
election, and it was stolen. We know they have support across the country; even our biased
media admit to some 74 million Trump voters, of whom 70% to 80% (depending on the poll) think
the election was stolen. But then what? "We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it." And
then what? The message is impotent. It has no consequence.
If 'the message' was doomed to impotence, inflicting 'a cost' was much more tangible, and
much more achievable. By forcing their way into the Capitol building, a motivated and
reasonably prepared mob could have caused tremendous damage. If -- and I stress the conditional
here -- if they wanted to inflict damage, they had a golden opportunity. They had guns,
presumably hidden, and far outnumbered the handful of guards. Any firefight would have been
over quickly, with the mob victorious. Security guards, staffers, even congressmen would have
been easy prey, for kidnapping, injury, or worse. But this did not happen.
... ... ...
Notice how congressmen, left and right, responded to the event. All were indignant. All were
outraged. All condemned the "senseless violence" of the crazed mob and the "attempted
overthrow" of American democracy. All of them: left, right, and center; Democrat and
Republican; Trump supporter or not. All of them condemned it.
Again: Why? The answer here is clear: All congressmen, of all stripes, have a vested
interest in sustaining the system, more or less in its current form . This is obvious. They
are all 'winners' in the system. It has made them all rich, famous, and powerful. Yes, they
fight for relative power and relative influence, but this is largely a sham. The
Republican-Democrat battles are only there to give the impression of real competition. Instead,
in reality, we have a deep and radical monopoly -- a monopoly of pro-corporate, pro-capitalist,
pro-war, pro-Israel, and pro-Jewish individuals. On these things, they all agree. I've been
saying as much for many years: We should focus not on what divides the two parties, but on
what unites them . This is far more revealing.
... More than anything, Trump was a symbol: a symbol of resistance, of defiance, and of an
'in your face' attitude. But nothing more. The Trump presidency was all show, no substance. It
was, and is, hardly worth dying over.
And by 'media,' I mean all media. Consider what our beloved Tucker Carlson had
to say , speaking at the beginning of his show on the very first day after the protest:
Political violence begets political violence. That is an iron law that never changes. We
have to be against that, no matter who commits the violence or under what pretext, no matter
how many self-interested demagogues assure us the violence is justified or necessary. We have
a duty to oppose all of this, not simply because political violence kills other people's
children, but because in the end it doesn't work.
No good person will live a happier life because [Ashli Babbitt] was killed in a hallway of
the Capitol today. So our only option, as a practical matter, is to fix what is causing this
in the first place. You may have nothing in common with the people on the other side of the
country -- increasingly, you probably don't -- but you're stuck with them. The idea that
groups of Americans will somehow break off into separate peaceful nations of like-minded
citizens is a fantasy. That will not happen. There is no such thing as 'peaceful separation';
there never has been, and there won't be.
The two hemispheres of this country are inseparably intertwined, like conjoined twins.
Neither can leave without killing the other. As horrifying as this moment is, we have no
option but to make it better, to gut it out.
The entry of the Capitol building was spontaneous. Nobody saw it coming.
In the immediate aftermath, the media didn't know whether to promote it or bury it. It
took hours and days for the narrative to coalesce on orders from the top.
As it was happening, the media was gob-smacked. The 'insurrection' narrative didn't truly
get going until the protest was long over.
It's real tiresome to do this but people need to be reminded that Ziocorporate conman
fraud Trump and his MAGA brand are a product of the same lot that governs the Democrats, and
that he was never on his constituency's side:
And it's necessary because if there's a chance to unite even a small group of people after
realising how they're being had, then there's a chance for a small change to snowball into
something larger. And it should not stay on the white side of the divide, it's not like the
plandemic's been killing the economy for whites only. No "populist anti-Deep State patriot"
or national leader goes around endorsing other countries' politicians, much less Israel's,
the purest manifestation of corporate bankster power acting in unison with neocolonial
globalism, a trait shared by Biden and Trump.
Actions should be peaceful, because entities like the Pentagon and CIA have an absolute
monopoly on violent repression...
One Christian fellow I listened to said that Antifa were definitely there. He took video
of them walking down the street. That just proves to me that even Antifa knew they were no
threat, otherwise they wouldn't have been mingling among thousands and thousands of Trump
supporters.
The fellow said that from what he could see, the Trump protesters were unarmed, well
behaved, smiling, and content with waving their flags. He said they are proud patriots and
would never think of destroying art work or smashing up the Capitol Building.
He said on the 15 to 20 previous trips he's made to the Capitol Building, the pop-up metal
barriers have always been up, but no barriers were up on January 6th. He said on a previous
trip he had stepped onto the grass to take a picture and was quickly told by an officer to
"get off the grass". But on January 6th, the sidewalks were blocked off, forcing people onto
the grass.
We've seen the video of what looks to be an Antifa member breaking a window, only to be
stopped by a Trump supporter.
No, these were salt of the earth people who were no threat to Antifa OR the spineless
politicians. They knew this, but they've played it up for all it's worth.
Amazon includes a couple accurate blurbs on the product description page:
This short book is wicked, truthful, and entertaining. The author, after outlining a
step-by-step procedure for bringing about a coup, analyzes modern (post–Second World
War) coups, and points out why some succeeded and others failed. ( New Yorker )
An extraordinarily competent and well-written work, displaying very wide knowledge of
the ways in which coups, both successful and unsuccessful, have actually been organized. (
Times Literary Supplement )
You don't do a "coup" by invading the congressional discussion bunker in a nominal
democracy. You do a "coup" by ordering up CIA-organized troops to take over communication
centers as checkpoints secured by APCs go up everywhere as congresscritters are frogmarched
to a nearby stadium. The CEOs and salaried Wokers of the social meedja companies would swear
enthusiastic allegiance to the new powers. Antifa would be issued clean shirts, ties and
government-approved truncheons. Then a grand proclamation that there will be a convention to
work towards national unity. Ooops, that last part actually happened.
If there had been a coup, it would 100% evident.
If there had been fair elections, it would 100% evident.
The event was, variously, a "coup," an "insurrection," or at minimum, "a riot." Protesters
were "right-wing extremists" and even "domestic terrorists" who were attacking "the very
basis of American democracy."
A coup?
An insurrection?
Attacking the very basis of American democracy?
The only reason the crowd was there in the first place was to protest against the people
committing those crimes through election fraud. Hopefully at least the crowd has figured out
that the Republicans and Trump are not on their side...
Jazzhand McFeels of https://therightstuff.biz/ has written a very interesting
article on Dissident Mag about some sudden changes in the administration that could explain
this thing.
If the attack on the Capitol was already so clumsy and ineffective, how could those same
people succeed in the much more difficult task of seccession?
You're assuming that the phony attack was planned by the people who would be involved in a
secession movement. I haven't seen any evidence that it was.
Cui Bono? The Key to 6 January is what did NOT happen. The two houses of congress had gone
off to hear, separately, in public broadcast, evidence from objecting congressmen that there
was massive electoral fraud to criminally deliver the election to Biden. MSM transmitted the
opening statements to the debate by McConnell and Schumer. These two said that there was no
election fraud. MSM then pulled away when the other congressmen started presenting the view
that there WAS fraud. Although MSM was not going to carry what the people are not supposed to
know, and filled in instead with their own propagandists and the Party Line, the proceedings
examining election fraud would have been seen by some of the public through the internet
streams and C-Span. This was clear evidence which the courts should have heard, but refused to
hear. BUT, instead of Congress publicly hearing evidence, the hearings abruptly STOPPED. Why?
The Capitol police, following instructions, opened the barricades and waved the demonstrators
to come in. The demonstrators were guided to the spot where the Deep State assassin was
waiting. A person was shot. After that, there were NO MORE discussions of election fraud. Biden
was confirmed without the airing of evidence of fraud. 6 January was a simple, but elegant,
Deep State SETUP. A psyop. The American people have been, once again, deceived. Once everybody
submits to vaccination there will never again be disputed elections, just like in the third
world.
Correction: The media said that the policeman "collapsed when he got back to the Precinct.
.that he MAY have been hit with a fire extinguisher." It was not reported as fact. No other
subsequent report abouthow he died albeit it should have been established by now.
The second poilce officer who the media says was "killed" by the "riots" was a man who we
heard nothing about on the date of the event, but who, five days later, committed suicide. The
suicide story is not speculation. It was given as a fact. They call this suicide a "killing"
because of the riots. It is more likely a police officer shooting his mouth off about these
lies,who, five days later was suicided.
This summer and fall at least a dozen police officers were killed. Many more were injured.
One got his eye knocked out. Many were very gravely injured. The government officials applauded
their killers, posted bail for them, and every step of the way government officials "incited
the violence".
Trump made a speech in front of his supporters laying out the evidence of the election
fraud. He was complaining about the election fraud, a fraud that was never scutinized or
investigated by anyone except his own lawyers and a few other lawyers, like Sidney Powell. They
want to impeach him for publicly complaining about their stealing the election from him. It's
like someone getting their home stolen, and when the victim publicly complains, he is
threatened with arrest.
Again, they fundament their impeachment grounds on the "insurrection" of January 6, but
again, like the election fraud, no one has scrutinized or conducted the most cursory
investigation of it The fact that we still don't know how that policeman died is telling. The
speculations made about him getting hit by a fire extinguisher are still floating around when
at this point, it should be an established fact how he died. The dopiest doctor in this country
would be able to diagnose a trauma to the head or body, if there were any physical trauma of
that kind.
Two people died from natural causes. Yet, no details are given. One woman, age 34 and
overweight was said to have been "trampled by the mob." Minutes after her death her family and
closest friends were bad mouthing her, saying that she was mentally unstable, a conspiracy
theorist, and "had problems in the past." She just died shortly before, and that was their
public statements about their dearest friend and family member.
Ashli Babbits death was a provocative act that would have encouraged Trump supporters to
turn on the police. It is no coincidence that those around her breaking windows, and screaming
that she was dead when she was not, also provoked the crowds of Trump supporters. They are seen
clearly on the video near Ashli not only breaking windows but changing their clothes after they
had done so to hide their identification. This is clearly seen on the video. One guy provoking
the crowds, breaking windows and screaming that Ashli was dead when she was not, was clearly
Antifa, proven to be Antifa by video evidence. Yet, after January 6, he was interviewed by CNN.
Clearly, the Antifa provocateur was not arrested by the Washington police or the FBI, but at
least 6 Trump supporters were arrested for breaking curfew after 6 p.m. when all that happened
at the Capitol was over. Those six were the first arrested – for breaking curfew. I do
not find it a coincidence that both Ashli Babbitt and those breaking the windows around her,
and screaming that she was dead when she was not, all acted to provoke the crowds and were all
proven to be Antifa members. Was it coincidence that Ashli Babbitt's getting shot also acted as
an unwitting provocateur, along with the Antifa members around her in the Capitol that day? Or
was both Ashli and Antifa working for our security agencies that day, all playing their roles
as agents provocateurs.
Why wouldn't the DOJ and FBI investigate the election fraud? Was it because the government
did it? That would be a good reason not to investigate. Sidney Powell has produced an affidavit
from a Serb who said it was the CIA who oversaw the manipulation of the US voting machines from
Serbia, a country completely taken over by the CIA. He also writes about Hunter Biden's
clandestine trip there in August 2020 to meet with these people.
Whoever didn't develop a sense of humor with your Ziocorporate fraud reality TV show
president posing as patriot anti-deep maverick ain't gonna do it now.
Yes, the coup and insurrection had ALREADY happened.
The coup and insurrection happened when the Democrats AND Republicans rigged the election.
Democratic state courts and election officials changed voting laws, and Republican state
legislatures looked the other way.
You are wrong on so many counts. The event was not spontaneous, that is quite clear when the
guards let the protesters in and they mostly went inside peacefully while a handful of rioters
did minimal damage. Some Antifas, yeah, for sure. But someone stole Pelosi's computer or did
they? That smacks of a plan. It achieved the objectives of the groups on the inside. The
marchers that went inside had to have been, for the most part, surprised that they were
welcomed. Did you see how they walked in between the purple ropes? Took photographs and
selfies, some of these with the guards? Did you see the videos of some of the protesters
stopping the people trying to break the glass windows? ...
I see "anti-Semitism" has made it to the floor during these impeachment hearings. LMAO. I
would guess that 97% of Trump's base is the muh Israel crowd and Trump is as pro-Israel,
pro-Jewish as it gets.
Even more laughable is Maxine Waters standing up and decrying violence. I guess Maxine has a
very selective memory. All these demsheviks and the gay guys over at CNN who had no problem
with Antifa/BLM are now staunch advocates for the Constitution and have a problem with riots.
How in the hell do these cretins live with themselves? Have these hypocrites no shame? It can't
be said enuff that Antifa/BLM's and (((the leftoids))) fingerprints are all over these riots.
This is the new 9-11, folks, don't believe your lying eyes. Look at some of those scraggly
people busting windows and attacking cops? Do they look like the average Trump voter? Do these
young punks scaling the walls look like the average Trump voter?
The democratic party is now pretending to "call out" the "white supremacists" in Congress.
Even if there were "white supremacists" in Congress, they would be not one bit different from
"brown supremacists", "black supremacists","yellow supremaicsts", if by "supremacists" is meant
politicians that belong to the Hispanic caucus, Black caucus or Asian caucus , ALL of whom
claim to be looking out for the welfare of their respective group.
This is of course what is going on here. The democratic party politicians, Pelosi, Schumer,
Biden and the whole left has been race baiting against white people as a default manner of
doing politics for over sixty years now. It is the fault of the FAUX REPUBLICAN PARTY, that has
been posing as conservatives who many whites believe "have their backs", against the hate and
shenanigans the anti-white left perpetrates. THEY ARE WRONG. We see plainly now, that what the
U.S. has is a uni-party, that is left and far left and includes good old Republican RINO's, but
the left and far left is used by the elite to keep and gain control of the U.S. for their own
agenda. The idea now operating is to belittle, denigrate and cow white folks as never before,
because many of the protesters at the recent "event", scared the living bleep out of the
politicians who have simply not been representing them. The corporations and tech moguls,etc.
are not taking the side of the left because they are "better" citizens or politicians than
people on the right side of the political spectrum. They take the side of the left because that
is where these corporations know that the radical Americans are, the ones that burn, loot and
murder and therefore can be used to divide the nation for the big corporations and tech
moguls,etc. Any honest person that considers what happened at the so called violent
demonstration in D.C. knows that compared to the violence that ANTIFA, BLM and other groups
perpertrated on innocent Americans last summer, knows perfectly well that there is no
comparison. The anti-white left, enabled by the democratic party and the news media, IN SERVICE
OF THE U.S. ELITE. BURNED, LOOTED AND MURDERED THE CITIZENS OF AMERICA for months, WITHOUT A
SINGLE WORD FROM PELOSI, SCHUMER, BIDEN HARRIS, ETC.
The simple fact is that these D.C. politicians were scared shitless by some plain American
citizens, who finally felt they needed to meet these representatives that keep ignoring and
abusing them. The wrong people are being blamed here.
Before reading this article, the reader might consider the fact that there was NO COUP, by
the accepted meaning that the word "coup" denotes. Now, if the fake news media and the
democratic party want to explain the event by bending the facts and actual events to fit their
own interpretation of it, that's a problem due to their dishonesty.
The apartheid settler gang is beneath contempt. It blocks supply of vaccines for covid to
the Palestinian people and blockades their trade and freedom of travel and navigation. Like
the USA they have totally filled up with hubris and lost their way in the world.
Biden has surrounded himself with dual allegiance appointees in the critical security
agencies so that he cannot achieve peace or make progress with any of his (foolishly)
perceived enemy nations. He will find it almost impossible to negotiate in any meaningful way
with Iran or China or Russia or Iraq or Syria or pretty much any other nation that is invaded
by his armies or sanctioned by his idiot decisions or threatened by Israel's
belligerence.
The tensions have been incredibly heightened in many nations due to the coronavirus
transmission within their populations and the persistent suspicion that it has a USA origin.
Any USAi pretense of negotiating in good faith in these circumstances is virtually
impossible. All the more so when reactionaries lead both Israel and USA.
Biden is right when he says nothing will change. His ally in the middle east, Israel, has
an arsenal of formidable power sufficient to command an uncomfortable peace in any
circumstance. Yet it has no integrity to clinch a deal with anybody such is the universal
distrust of their intentions. Time and again this illegal settler state has mauled every
neighbor in a most grievous way. Every week they attack Syria with missiles! The aggrieved
neighbors will not forget or forgive the treachery. That is just how it is.
There are no statesmen in the USA or Israel with the nous or capacity to find a way
out.
Few observations on Biden, Iran and the nuclear deal.
I don't know if US will or will not return to implement it's obligations under the UNSC 2231,
nor I know if US Jewish lobby will allow that. But for sure Iran will not renegotiate for new
terms or a new deal on nuclear program secondly under no circumstances Iran will negotiate
(with anyone) her conventional military capabilities or her policies and alliances toward her
allies in the region since these are real matter of national security for Iran. But also
there are signs from Biden that should be considered. Firstly almost all Biden's national
security team are diplomats with experience negotiating with Iran that could be a signal on
policy change, secondly I believe due to strategic failure of maximum pressure to subdue Iran
and more importantly due to US' own strategic necessity to keep China and Russia away from
ME, US and EU will want to decouple or even prevent Iran from a mutual strategic necessity or
alliance with China or and Russia for that reason IMO it might be possible US will adopt a
new posture toward Iran. I also believe Iran's foreign policy in ME is basically based on her
long term interests and security with her regional alliances, multipolarity, and stability in
her region, therefore any proposal by US or EU to agitate this policy will be rejected or not
adopted by Iran.
The apartheid settler gang is beneath contempt. It blocks supply of vaccines for covid to
the Palestinian people and blockades their trade and freedom of travel and navigation. Like
the USA they have totally filled up with hubris and lost their way in the world.
Biden has surrounded himself with dual allegiance appointees in the critical security
agencies so that he cannot achieve peace or make progress with any of his (foolishly)
perceived enemy nations. He will find it almost impossible to negotiate in any meaningful way
with Iran or China or Russia or Iraq or Syria or pretty much any other nation that is invaded
by his armies or sanctioned by his idiot decisions or threatened by Israel's
belligerence.
The tensions have been incredibly heightened in many nations due to the coronavirus
transmission within their populations and the persistent suspicion that it has a USA origin.
Any USAi pretense of negotiating in good faith in these circumstances is virtually
impossible. All the more so when reactionaries lead both Israel and USA.
Biden is right when he says nothing will change. His ally in the middle east, Israel, has
an arsenal of formidable power sufficient to command an uncomfortable peace in any
circumstance. Yet it has no integrity to clinch a deal with anybody such is the universal
distrust of their intentions. Time and again this illegal settler state has mauled every
neighbor in a most grievous way. Every week they attack Syria with missiles! The aggrieved
neighbors will not forget or forgive the treachery. That is just how it is.
There are no statesmen in the USA or Israel with the nous or capacity to find a way
out.
A new JCPOA will obviously have to eliminate all sanctions. But that might not be
enough. Iran might want compensation for the economic damage done, compensation from the UK,
France, and Germany as well as the US. Moreover, Iran will want to keep its now much larger
stockpile of low-enriched uranium. It might want an even larger stockpile, and the right to
enrich to 20%, which it is now doing. A breeder reactor and a plutonium stockpile would be
nice, too.
But there are even other demands that might be made: reduction or removal of
US/NATO/Israeli forces in the Gulf; reduction or elimination of Israeli nuclear
weapons.
That train left the station.
In the past 5 years Iran re-configured it's economy into an autarcic fully industrialized,
food secure, and diversified economy. It now earns more from the sale of manufactures and
foods than from petroleum. It now manufactures AfraMax tankers, general cargo vessels, and
naval vessels. It manufactures cars and trucks, and railroad rolling stock. It built hydro
and irrigation schemes. It launches satellites into orbit.
Iran is now pressing ahead with the Arak heavy water reactor.
Khameni just banned import of NATO vaccines, and ordered the country to be vaccinated with
Iran's own vaccine.
Khameni and the hard liners will not permit Iran to rejoin or to negotiate any agreements
with the "Great Satan". Their line will be the US must show itself to be agreement capable by
rejoining the JCPOA and removing any and all sanctions while paying damages too.
Iran will increase the amount of assistance given the Houthis. Trump's declaration of the
Houthis as terrorists, benefits the resistance by solidifying their adherence to it. The
Houthis must now "go for broke" or surrender. They will not surrender.
The harsh reality is Biden/Harris will be occupied at home suppressing the MAGA crowd.
Since this group is 74 million strong, and mostly white, in a country trying to make them
second class citizens, will be quite a challenge that. The jury is still out on that one.
Then there is the not so small matter of US oil production dropping like a stone from 12
mmBbl/day to 7 by July with further drops in the following 12 months. This coupled with and
likely due to bankruptcies of a large number of producers going forward.
@Art istently pushed a
Zionist worldview and support for Israel's nationalist prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, as
well as opposition to Islamic extremism and ISIS.
While the Mercers have helped aid President Trump and other American nationalists, it is
clear they are doing so not out of a traditionalist worldview, but to push their own
agenda.
This is the very first time in recent US history that a small cabal of "deep insiders"
have achieved such total control of all the real instruments of power. The bad news is that
they know that they are a small minority and they realize that they need to act fast to
secure their hold on power.
I would take this as the key phrase.
When the small minority if Bolshevik radicals forced their way into power in Russia 1917,
they were also very aware that they were a small cabal of "deep insiders" and immediately set
out to arrest or simply shoot their opponents (ethnic Russians) to fortify their
dictatorship. Plus ASAP they turned this into a process of mass transportation and
imprisonment .
I would expect the new Woke US ZioGob regime to do exactly the same, and move fast against
the "deplorables".
There's a lot of delusion and confusion in this article. The US has never been a
"democracy", and if it ever was a republic, that's not been the case for no less than the 150
years since Lobbyington D.C. was incorporated, not counting the incorporation of the dollar in
1913.
The Saker is making the circus shitshow sound like the Trumpet was a simple victim of the
evil Democrats when in reality he's a Ziocorporate fraud that's spent the last 4 years trying
to destroy the possibility that Americans, left or right, associate with each other to protect
their interests as individuals and as a society.
Domestic issues allow the Ziocorporate regime to pretend there're "rival" parties in the US,
but sell weapons to Ziodi Arabia or bomb Syria and CNN/Ziocorporate will reveal their true
nature and praise the Trumpet for doing "the right thing". Their "rivalry" goes as far as
necessary to capture the partisan sentitments of their respective political markets.
Trumpet had 4 years to use antitrust laws against Ziocorporate monopolies, to start contacts
between his constituency and whatever Democrat and/or independent factions were willing to come
to the table to devise a way forward to "MAGA", to expose the multi-trillion $$ corruption of
the Pentagon and its contractors, and a long etc., but zero, zilch, nada.
Trumpet and the Democrats set up and sacrificed the Qtard/MAGA crowds in D.C., did he really
expect the Democrats not to treat his idiotic partisans as "terrorists" when he treated the
Democrat's idiotic partisans as terrorists during the riots a few months back? Now the people
are more radicalised than ever and it'll be harder to find common ground.
Does the Saker really think that progressive anti-war movements, for an example, trying to
protest in federal property won't be treated as "domestic terrorists", thanks to Trump's
manipulation of his Qtart bunch?
The Trumpet reeks of COINTELPRO, and his work is done.
@anarchyst hen made
public utilities available for all (obviously without compensation to the owners). No more of
the sad "private company" excuse, and no more billions into the pockets of criminals who hate
us.
Also, make Dorsey, Zuckerberg, Pichai et al. serve serious jail time for election
tampering if nothing else. Both to send out a clear warning to others, and for the simple
decency to see justice served.
Of course this will not happen short of a French Revolution-style regime shift. But since
(sadly) the same is equally true even for your extremely generous and modest proposal, I see
no harm in dreaming a little bigger.
Well put article, thank you. Personally, I suspect that for once the bumbling incompetent
Democrats out-faked the vote better than the Republicans, for whom sabotaging the will of the
people is historically Job No. 1. Maybe seventeen million fake Biden votes trounced ten
million phony Trump votes delivered by the ever-reliable electronic voting machines, and
there you go. Like the man said, if voting could make a difference, it would not be
legal.
Trump is a larger than life figure you must either love or loathe. I was impressed by his
inaugural address but skeptical of his intent and his ability to deliver. Yes, it is true the
one great thing he has done is to wake millions of Americans to the reality that an unelected
government makes all the important policy decisions with no concern for the consent of the
governed. And this is a real game changer.
It is sickening to watch the demonization of our fellow Americans in high gear this week.
The CIA's media assets are certainly earning their thirty pieces of silver. The media shows
us images of the "rioters" who terrified their owners, and assumes we will obediently get
scared of them too. No, fellas, not this time.
This system cannot be reformed from within. Its corruption is the logical result of
keeping an obsolete form of government to run a 21st century post-capitalist global empire.
It was devised by eighteenth century aristocrats primarily not to interfere with their local
class privilege in a tiny agrarian country. We are again at a point in our history where the
contradictions are too great to sustain. We will either become all of one thing, or all of
the other, but we cannot continue to pretend that Washington as it is has anything to do with
liberty. In my youth, I thought a socialist revolution would do the job, but since there is
zero support for such a thing among a thoroughly indoctrinated population, we'll have to work
with what we've got. Our survival, and the world's, is at stake.
History has other notable analogs to instruct us in this matter. Recall how the Western
powers planned to annihilate their WWII ally Russia once their common foe Germany had been
dealt with.
Complacency in games of Empire is ill-advised. What's the end-game? What does Bibi have to
say about the USA in particular and the Goyim in general?
And so if all Americans whites will perish, so what? Who cares!
For starters, probably them. Such a lack of empathy for innocent victims, as ignorant and
niaive and inactively complicit as they arguably may be, is IMO strikingly reminiscent of the
inhuman Israeli attitude towards the Palestinians.
I see this article is quite relevant to another one on a different blog that I have been
fruitlessly attempting to comment upon. It keeps getting disappeared immediately and not even
sent to moderation where normally all submissions first go. Have had that trouble two days
running on two different articles about i) the impending crackdowns on free speech and ii)
the planned purge of Republican officeholders by the triumphalist Clinton/Obama/Biden mob.
I'll go with my remarks on the coming attempt at a purge since it is closer to the Saker's
treatment of the Nomenklatura (cognate to "nomenclature" specifying ordered classes of
things, including people or their offices, in English) or in American street language simply
identifying who is a "made man," i.e., an untouchable in the mafia. Yeah, the Dem hierarchy
are sure feeling they are all made men (and women) following the set to in the Capitol which
they most possibly facilitated and have certainly exploited to the limit.
Diana Johnstone authored the article which was titled "Biden Exploits his Capitol Gains"
and may be found at CN.
Ms. Johnstone only hints at the plans that Biden and the DNC have to essentially purge the
Republican party from our federal government.
Since I'm still a registered Democrat, I received literally thousands of emails throughout
the campaign from Dem candidates across the country, most of whom I had never heard about
before, incessantly trying to pump me for money and organize with them to crush Trump and
other Republican vermin.
Even before the bruhaha in the Capitol Building on January 6th had settled down I started
to receive a new flood of emails from Democratic sources imploring me to aid them financially
and "morally" to extirpate not only Trump from office in these last two weeks of his term,
but to punish virtually every prominent GOP politician also with forced removal from office.
Ted Cruz (whose strident right wing rhetoric I have never personally favored but recognise as
protected free speech) and the dozen or so senators and representatives who dared to utilise
the specified remedies outlined in the constitution to challenge the results of the electoral
college votes were targeted as basically enemies of the state with calls for their immediate
resignation or expulsion by congressional action. I've seen no evidence that either Mr. Trump
nor any of these legislators requested that the demonstrators break the law or attempt the
impossible and try to overthrow the government, which is the most heinous accusation that
Biden and his minions make. It would seem that Mr. Biden already had a "counter-coup" working
at his behest.
I swear, several of the emails I received spoke of permanently crushing the Republican
opposition for good! Obviously Uncle Joe's minions choose not to practice what they preach
and his calls for "unity" and comity are basically a load of bushwah. If the readers need
evidence, I've cut and pasted from just one such email that I have not yet permanently
deleted from my files, to wit:
" AFTER lives were lost in an attempted coup at the Capitol, after walking through
destroyed halls and ransacked offices, after explosive devices were removed, 147 Republicans
in Congress still voted to overturn the results of the 2020 elections and sided with Donald
Trump in order to complete the coup.
The dangerous rhetoric the likes of Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, Donald Trump, Devin Nunes, Jim
Jordan and others used has resulted in months of death threats against election, public
health, and government officials.
They urged Trump supporters to rise up and fight against a "stolen" election, even though
none of them contested the integrity of their own re-elections.
It culminated in the first violent occupation of the U.S. Capitol in more than 200 years
and nearly resulted in the slaughtering of elected officials by armed insurrectionists.
These Republicans sided with terrorists and White supremacists against our democracy: They
do not deserve to collect a taxpayer-provided salary nor deserve the dignity of serving in
the very Government they tried to overthrow.
Join Cori Bush and Democrats all across the nation to remove the Republicans who incited a
violent coup from office. "
Honestly, this is not the most inflammatory of the rhetoric sent my way by unabashed
authoritarians who have not the slightest understanding that they are adopting the exact
behavior they are accusing others of practicing. Note how they kneejerk conflate protest of
possible election fraud (which is a debatable issue if there is hard evidence to present)
with terrorism and purported "white supremacy," apparently a trump card which never has to be
acutally shown in this game. They not only want to democratically defeat the "deplorables" at
the ballot box but to purge them by force from any national debates over the issues of the
day. Mind you, I am still NOT a Republican because I mostly oppose their warmongering and
looting of the treasury at the behest of their cronies just as much as I've come to revile
the nearly identical actions of the Dems. My opposition to the blatant hyper-partisanship of
both sides is not itself rooted in partisanship. I think the founding fathers should have
followed Washington's advice and outlawed political parties period. Moreover, money is NOT
free speech and corporations are NOT people. Neither should control the process, which,
unfortunately, they both do. But those are issues to be debated at some other time probably
when we are reduced to a one party state if Biden or his successor gets a really effective
purge going.
The owners of America have decided. You plebes will do as you are told and the owners will
do what they want. Trump's owners, the military industrial complex and the zionist lobby,
have thrown him under the bus. Bummer dude but you don't get to be "the one". It is so easy
to manipulate ego maniacs.
What deal did they cut with Biden's owners (media (all 6), med-mafia (pharma on top), tech
and CIA+lawfare (DOJ, FBI, IRS))?
1) Biden will NOT end the sanctions against Iran. He may say "we'll negotiate" but it will
drag on forever.
2) The MIC gets to keep the "civilian special forces" and most importantly control of the
NSA.
So after doing all the dirty work Trump gets thrown under the bus. LMAO. Will he be a
broken man like LBJ or Nixon or will he drift off into irrelevance like most of the rest?
The central banking cartel gets what it wants (all FED chair positions, Secretary of
Treasury) for its people from both parties so they control the money which controls all else.
They have supported Bolsheviks, fascists and FDR so they have no political affiliation other
than to themselves. They are the true party of power.
Forced vaccinations, tracking and rigged "science" to justify everything are going to get
worse. To all those who think you will get a "Socialist Republic" get a grip. You will get
Chinese capitalism. The worst of both worlds. Single party dictatorship and the most
exploitative capitalist system ever. It makes the robber barons of the late 1800's roll over
in their graves in awe. The left owners worship the Chinese model.
"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yTuPFeaD3U"
"Look for your friends, but do not trust to hope. It has forsaken these lands"
Thank the great populist patriot, the Trumpet! Saved everyone from the Deepstate Democrats
by uniting the Deepstate Democrats and the war-profiteering and surveillance machine in
purpose. What a strategist!
Now the Pentagon and 3-letter intelligence agencies can start harassing and framing all
Americans, of the left and right, mind you, that dissent from the Ziocorporate regime's party
line.
This very website might find itself in the spotlight for its freer approach to speech as
Ziocorporate data miners must by now already have all they need to move on to a more
aggressive phase of "anti-terrorism" at home.
Now that the tech companies are coming out in the open, the parallels with the American
Revolution are more appropriate I think. The key to the success of the American revolution
was the involvement of successful businessmen, probably for profit and for ideological
reasons both. They probably saw the taxation without representation measures continuing,
perhaps with the US becoming as oppressed as Scotland (not sure how many Irish were in the
colonies in the beginning – but the Scots were certainly there, and perhaps a better
analogy)
The linking between the money and mob power (not mafia), as best known through the Loyal
Nine and their street muscle, the South Enders is what birthed the revolution. This evolved
into the Committees of Correspondence, which was more respectable and took care of the
organization and coordination. The Sons of Liberty took more care of the street muscle,
evolving into an organized militia (or perhaps just a Rabble in Arms..)
Today, the same problem exists – the physical means of communication are owned and
patrolled by the government, and it looks like explicit Right communication will be outlawed.
This is the first problem, establishing communications. The second is money – how to
provide support and cover (plenty of incidents with identified people, such as the Gaspee
Affair – you needed alibis for people in trouble, or lawyers get them out again).
Finally, you need street muscle, and later military muscle to capture strategic assets (arms
and supply depots), and also the ability to buy external support That's the big risk –
inviting in an external actor. Would the revolution been different if French regulars had
been sent, not just Prussian mercenaries?
Anyway, the need for secure comms on enemy platforms is the most important and not without
risk. The committees of Correspondence functioned as servers to distribute comms. Capture or
destruction of these servers I imagine was a high priority for the government.
But can you imagine, these merchants thought they could resist the might of the British
Empire! I think that at the beginning they must have thought that they could put pressure on
the local officials to make some changes – things kept escalating, and we end up with
the Declaration of Independence.
Thanks for the info. The vote count data analysis in that vid is very enlightening and
convincing. As if we need more convincing that the 2020 election was fraudulent. But if you
do or have acquaintances that still need convincing, watch the presentation.
The healing is heading our way. Over the last few days I took a little time off from the
'net. Caught a re-run of Rumpole of the Bailey. "The Golden Thread" that runs through English
common law. Good stuff, not taught in school nowadays. Too bad, really. Then I tried to catch
up on all the goings on, and boy did somebody kick over the chamber pot ant hill. I'm barely
keeping up.
"Not since Abraham Lincoln was smuggled into Washington has anyone assumed the presidency of
a more divided and angry nation than Joe Biden. He brings with him a satchel full of scandals
and an agenda of mumbled promises. His pledge to be the great healer rings hollow. His recent dishonest
comments concerning Trump's advocacy of violence at the Capitol only proves the point. "
"The elites have no idea how angry millions of Americans are." Quotes from above article in
"free Republic" (see the link). Boy, there are some irritated people out there.
"Dear idiots, you're like the wife with her arm in a sling and both eyes blackened telling
her husband "Please don't say anything to Joe. He'll be mad." Says woman and immigrant to America,
now a citizen. "The 2020 election was a fraud -- and Congress including the Republicans --
are cool with that." To quote another blogger.
Meanwhile inside the Nation's Capital ..... it is, to quote Rumpole, a question of r
loyalty.
... "We have Congress critters being hustled in panic down the escape hatch and out through
the tunnels for their own protection from outraged American voters ." As one blogger put
it . How DARE she say that.
...Those [pictures of summer riots] didn't age well. Remember though, police protection is
for those who deserve it, as you saw in NYC.
Here in the Forbidden City we see members of the elite Praetorian Guard secret service and
local police escorting a smiling member of the loyal senate past angry rabble voters alledged
to be involved in the mostly peaceful protests Wednesday.
If that was his plan he's have done it by now. Trump's talent has always been to goad his
opponent into overplaying their hand. I don't have much hope in Kunstler's thesis that Trump
is about drop the hammer on the commies, but he can force them to out themselves. This
weekends coordinated media lockdown is a straight up big-brother type move that even retards
should recognize as tyranny.
"Conviction immediately removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate
may vote to further punish the individual by barring him or her from holding future federal
office, elected or appointed. As the threshold for disqualification is not explicitly mentioned
in the Constitution, the Senate has taken the position that disqualification votes only require
a simple majority rather than a two-thirds supermajority. The Senate has used disqualification
sparingly, as only three individuals have been disqualified from holding future office.
Conviction does not extend to further punishment, for example, loss of pension. After
conviction by the Senate, "the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to
Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law" in the regular federal or state
courts . However, the Former Presidents Act of 1958, which
provides a pension, and other benefits, does not extend to presidents who were removed from
office following an impeachment conviction. Because of an amendment to that law made in 2013, a
former president who has been removed from office due to impeachment and conviction is still
guaranteed lifetime Secret Service protection. " wiki
------------
IMO impeachment from federal office exists for the purpose of removal from office. A former
official cannot be "removed from office." IMO the Belknap case will be treated as freakish.
pl
Query: Why are "they" so afraid of Trump? Solve for "they".
Outrage at their actions is not pre-emption of their motivations. Solve for "they". And
then systematically dismantle.
My favorite candidate for one of the "theys" is the teachers unions. Game plan follows to
dismantle the power and control of the teachers unions. Step by step.
Attend school board meetings, Get to know each school board member. Write letters. Field
slates of alternate candidates and support their election. Then work on state legislators who
are not tools for the teachers unions. Elect a state superintendent of education who is not a
tool of the teachers unions.
Elect key state officers who are not members of the teachers unions. Support Freedom
Foundation who works to get teachers to opt out of the teachers unions, denying the teachers
unions their annual dues ($1000 plus every year for teachers in California.
Or in the alternative, accept the fact it is too late to sweep back the sea. And hand this
over to the next generation. They will experience the consequences and the costs. Not us ho
are well into the last chapters of our own dotage. I hear my own call to action, and I now
find myself too lazy to carry it out. It is no longer my fight. And somehow it is also my
fault since my generation collectively delivered this fateful harvest.
.... So we can now only.......... rage, rage against the dying of the light .....
Record our own voices for posterity in case a new generation wants to learn what life on
planet earth was like before BigTech defined and controlled its every waking moment. For
future amusement, if nothing else. Look, they played Pick-Up-Sticks for fun after a sit down
family dinner.
But much like Mr Willet's splendid translations from times long past, we owe future
generations to also leave written personal histories. Just make sure it is non-biodegradable
hard copy.
Forget the First Amendment or the Second Amendment ..... I am going for the Fifth
Commandment. Honor thy father and mother. These kids today, if only they would listen
to us.
Wasn't that Socrates or Plato's lament too? I remember in high school in the late 1950's
reading this lament against the "young people" of Ancient Greece presented as a letter to the
editor. I was perplexed, because I did not know what we as teenagers were doing that was so
wrong back then that generated this ancient reminder.
I see over at the Daily Mail that my Republican Senator Pat Toomey agrees with me and is
calling for Trump to resign. Good.
I also see Nancy Pelosi has declared she has no understanding of Trump supporters and has
no desire to understand them. I just saw on CNN that House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn agrees
with her.
This is what she said:
"The California Democrat used an online video meeting Saturday with her hometown San
Francisco constituents to criticize the overwhelmingly white mob that attacked Congress on
Wednesday as it met to formally finalize Joe Biden's presidential victory over Trump.
'It has been an epiphany for the world to see that there are people in our country led by
this president, for the moment, who have chosen their whiteness over democracy,' Pelosi
said."
I don't think people around the world think what happened at the capital was about
whiteness. It's really too bad the Democratic Party leadership has such a simplistic view. It
also shows how anti-white some white people can be and why they want so much immigration we
don't need.
I don't know what the law is but I certainly have assumed that you had to be in office to
be impeached.
So I do not know what to make of this statement from House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn on
CNN today;
"We'll take the vote that we should take in the House, and (House Speaker Nancy Pelosi)
will make the determination as to when is the best time to get that vote and get the managers
appointed and move that legislation over to the Senate," Clyburn told CNN's Jake Tapper on
"State of the Union."
"It just so happens that if it didn't go over there for 100 days, it could -- let's give
President-elect Biden the 100 days he needs to get his agenda off and running, and maybe
we'll send the articles sometime after that," the South Carolina Democrat added."
He's talking about waiting more than three months to get the Senate involved which would
mean no trial until the summer. This makes no sense. Nobody should want us still dealing with
Trump's presidency in DC after January 20.
"... I hate virtually all of Trump's policies. I hate his stupidity in continually hiring people who hated him. He could have turned to members of the genuine left -- men such as Stephen Cohen -- for advice. ..."
"... n a classic act of projection, woke Dems accuse Trump of not conceding, whereas in fact they are the ones who never conceded the presidency in 2016. This is so obvious, and yet it has apparently become invisible to most!!! Memory hole opened up like a crack in the earth behind each step. ..."
"... The gullibility of Trump is astounding. He did everything to keep the swamp happy, to keep Israel happy, flipped on Nato and on Russia, had hawks left and right and at the end he will be discarded like a used condom. ..."
"... can't help but think that Donald Trump is a man with no common sense, lacking the real conviction of his words and just not very bright or he was to some degree willfully complicit in this now obviously dire state the U.S. finds itself. ..."
"... If anyone thinks there is some good news because this murderous, warring empire is coming to an end, I suggest you think again. The war machine is still fully intact and funded. The international bankers who are in complete control are buying up everything and are planning on a 'reset' dictated by them. To the world! Understandably, there will likely be a few countries who do not feel inclined to agree with this reset and it's terms. There will have to be war to correct this thinking, even if a billion or more are killed. The more the merrier. Less 'useless eaters' to deal with. ..."
Mr. Roberts is right on point when he says that Trump will be locked up.
The people running the United States are going to make an example of Trump. They will send
a message that no "outsider" should ever again dare to run for President.
Trump will spend the rest of his life behind bars.
I fear you are right. In this case it might be better if he weren't such a street fighter,
because standing up for himself to me isn't worth the price he will pay. He should get
himself and his family post haste to a country with no extradition and simply live the rest
of his life in peace. No one needs the vitriol that has been and will continue to be heaped
on him.
Trump _should_ spend the rest of his life behind bars -- for contributing to the deaths of
tens of thousands of human beings. Ordinary Syrians, Iranians, Cubans, and Venezuelans died
because of the murderous sanctions Washington put on their countries, and Pres. Trump did
nothing to help -- and in fact, intensified them.
Very similar to his indifference to the plight of Edward Snowden & Julian Assange.
Trump is a monster of self-centredness. In fact, in the words of his own former White House
Chief of Staff, he is 'the most damaged human being I have ever met.' Just the sort of
creature we would expect to find as head of the US empire
I'm afraid you are spot on -- Trump lies to the World when he was running for President
& then broke almost all of his promises -especially to drain the Swamp. He also
unforgivably allowed the Jews to take over Palistinian land etc. He has alot to answer for
even if he wasn't as War like as the 3 Presidents before him.
YOu re problably right, Jimmy.
But it turns out differently when one gets the point where Trump locked up prospect here is
not him but a whole lot of american people trying to get rid of globalism and the need for
wars
Who might be buried up along with him.
But not a word about the crimes of those who preceded him, which included the ultimate
crime, that of engaging in unjustified warfare?
Your post implies you have a standard of behaviour you are judging Trump by. By definition
it must be universally applied, otherwise all you are seeking is the selective imposition of
your view.
I agree. If Trump deserves lockup, so do Obama, Bush, and the Clintons.
I hate virtually all of Trump's policies. I hate his stupidity in continually hiring
people who hated him. He could have turned to members of the genuine left -- men such as
Stephen Cohen -- for advice.
But that is not the point. Since 2016 those who tried to eliminate Trump did so not for
his real crimes but for made-up. Basically his crime of being president in the first
place.
I n a classic act of projection, woke Dems accuse Trump of not conceding, whereas in
fact they are the ones who never conceded the presidency in 2016. This is so obvious, and yet
it has apparently become invisible to most!!! Memory hole opened up like a crack in the earth
behind each step.
Trump's crime, for which he may actually be locked up, was in truth just winning the
presidency in 2016 and humiliating Hillary (whom everyone hated anyhow). I am becoming quite
terrified of people I have known all my my life and even am related to.
Corrected assessment. His wealth and his 5 children (and their future) are too much of a
liability for him to do the necessary. His policy of appeasement will not work though with
the rabid bolshevik kabal.
I think he and his family will be persecuted and likely prosecuted unless the has the
foresight to move to Russia and save his skin.
The gullibility of Trump is astounding. He did everything to keep the swamp happy, to
keep Israel happy, flipped on Nato and on Russia, had hawks left and right and at the end he
will be discarded like a used condom.
Russia saw it from the get go, at the end he will have the full weight of both parties
against him, and instead of locking her up it will be the other way around. The cowards have
no sense of decency, they will not show any good will like he did.
Trump betrayed his base, failed to organize again and again, put his trust in all the
wrong people and now is done. I'll be surprised if he doesn't face jailtime on some trumped
up charges.
For all his charisma and good intentions he turned out a clueless clown, sad clown at the
end. History will not be kind, and neither will the victors.
True Americans have seen their last train leave the station, it will take time to realize
that there are no more trains. Game over.
I thought this was a good summation by Dr. Roberts. I can't help but think that Donald
Trump is a man with no common sense, lacking the real conviction of his words and just not
very bright or he was to some degree willfully complicit in this now obviously dire state the
U.S. finds itself. Maybe he owed the Rothschild clan a favour.
If anyone thinks there is some good news because this murderous, warring empire is
coming to an end, I suggest you think again. The war machine is still fully intact and
funded. The international bankers who are in complete control are buying up everything and
are planning on a 'reset' dictated by them. To the world! Understandably, there will likely
be a few countries who do not feel inclined to agree with this reset and it's terms. There
will have to be war to correct this thinking, even if a billion or more are killed. The more
the merrier. Less 'useless eaters' to deal with.
Try to see something good in creation every day. Try to do good every day. This world as
it is does not have much time. Someone said that what cannot go on forever won't! At some
point, the One who gives life to all will say it is enough. Some of us just celebrated his
most blessed nativity.
This guy biden is king of promises, and as every year goes by and so many promises are not
met, don't think these people wont show up on D.C.'s doorstep looking for revenge.
Who better to preside over the collapse of the empire? The usual rules will apply: the
feckless Dems – always at their abysmal worst when they assume power – will blame
the "evil Reps" for everything that goes wrong (and there will be plenty – although
none of it will ever be discussed publicly!), and the Reps will be at their sterling
obstructionist best. Talk of impeachment for Biden – who will be nowhere in sight for
most of his term – will linger throughout his term, while Trump will soon be prosecuted
and jailed, his entire administration canceled from the official histories, with Queen
Hillary named "Presidentess in Exile" for 2016-2020 due to alleged Russian interference with
her rightful coronation. The Empire will trumpet from on high for all to hear that this
signals the glorious victory of US Democracy (angelic chorus sounds here) over the forces of
darkness, or some such agitprop; and the skies will clear, the birds will sing, and a rosy
glow will return to the cheeks of all the fair maidens and indeterminant gendered of our
great land. The masks, of course, will remain firmly in place, as the "new normal" slowly
becomes merely business as usual, and the sheeple graze contentedly in their prison stalls,
content in the knowledge that Big Brother is looking out for their health and welfare, at
least until the ritual sacrificial slaughter of the lambs should be deemed necessary. For the
good of all, of course. Should all make for some excellent reality TV.
Well the empire is going to collapse the citizens before it collapses, and even before the
empire collapse comes a global scare of epic proportions to shake and rattle the cage for
those whom are not prepared.
Trump isn't going anywhere. I was at the rally in DC and listened to his
entire speech on the ellipse. He stated that he would not concede. With
this assurance why would the demonstrators have any reason to aggressively
breach the Capitol building? The whole thing was a staged provocation by antifa.
There are videos of how this was staged all over the internet. Let us all
hope and pray that the Scarlet(Whore) color revolution against Trump is finally
eradiated and extirpated now that all the Deep Satanists have been exposed for
their participation in the coup and election fraud.
The question has been asked – what is the US military going to do? Will they just
stay put and watch the theft unfold?
Whilst many commentators were soiling themselves in phantasies of a pro trump military coup
to end the charade, drain the swamp and burn down DC, PCR had a very clear view (expressed
elsewhere): why would the military object to a new leadership if it promises more war, more
blood, more money? It won't, it will welcome it in fact.
Be it as it may, and despite all the stinkin' lies about the election I would think it is
too tall an order for a non-murrican to mourn the self-destruction of the most evil, ghastly,
ruthless hegemon the world has seen in the last 100 years.
I second the sentiment. It's not even that. The media are full of Muricans' moaning about
their fate. It's everywhere – and on top of that, the scumbags are accusing China and
Russia for their "tribulations".
We don't care and we don't want to hear about how hard the life is for Billy Bob who would
die for the very criminals that have condemned him to a life of meth, moonshine and
malingering – while telling him that he is solely responsible for his own miserable
existence.
There is a huge big world elsewhere that is currently booming – thousand flowers are
blooming despite the oppression by the parasitical cancerous sub-empire – and yet, we
obsess over whether Trump is a fraud or not.
I suppose it provides a great platform for ranting :-)
Soros has funded the ANTFIA and BLM who infiltrated the Trump Stop The Steal Rally and it
was they who broke into the Capitol Building with the collusion of some police and security
which indicates Democrat involvement. There is substantial evidence of that now. SEE
https:/www.banned.video
Law enforcement has also failed to do anything about it and all the riots in 2020 and
Democrat crimes and corruption.
The US military needs to move on this asap to save the country from this untenable
situation which will only get worse over time. Arrest the Democrats, Soros, Pence all those
who colluded with him. Because thats what Washington, Jefferson, Madison and Adams would
so.
This ending of the Trump presidency certainly seems pretty anticlimactic for his
supporters. I've sometimes wondered if Trump wasn't intentionally some kind of straw man
whether he was in on it or not. Say what you will but in his final act he leads then leaves
his supporters in the lurch.
Let's step back and look at what he accomplished:
– Giving the rich one of the largest tax cuts in history at a time when they were
already making money hand over fist
– Putting the American embassy in Jerusalem
– Putting vassal states and institutions on notice
– Renegging on the Iran nuclear deal
– Starting a trade war with China
– Most importantly the TOTAL DELEGITIMIZATION of conservatism in America. I have
feeling this is no accident.
His associates and cronies like Roger Stone or Jared Kushner look like big time establishment
types.
4 years and he's still relying on liberal establishment platform Twitter to get out his
message? He could have migrated 70 million+ overnight to another platform. Now that would
have been a real act of resistance, not this half-assed Capitol clown show. In all this time
conservatives couldn't even cobble together their own social media? There's this stench of
wanton incompetence that vaguely reminds me of Saddam Hussein.
The lack of any mention or discussion of labor or working class concerns within what
comprises the "Left" or "Progressives" is the most telling feature of our time. The "Liberal
Media" rarely mention the working class and when they do, it's nearly always with a
disparaging tone. The idea that an organized, national, even international "Left" could
emerge and become dominant while deliberately ignoring and debasing working class people and
their concerns certainly marks a tremendous achievement among the moneyed elites who actually
run the Empire.
But the material interest/needs of the working class continue to express themselves in
ways even the smarty pants Silicon Valley CEO's, and MSNBC executives cannot foresee. A
significant part (Maybe the most significant part) of the "Trump movement" was never about
Trump. It was/is about the issues and concerns of the vast swath of working class and middle
class people across this country. Trump was the vehicle to express anger at the liberal
elites who have ignored the "commoners," in fly-over America. He was a poor choice for a
populist movement but he was all that was available at the time. Trump will be gone soon, but
as the events of 1/6/21 show, those issues and those people haven't gone anywhere. What new
political figure will arise to address these concerns?
It is common knowledge that high voter turnout favors the Dems and lower turnout favors
the Repubs. So of course, the DNC uses all kinds of schemes to manufacture, and generate lots
of votes. I know this personally. I received four mail-in ballots in the month of October.
Would they have figured out how to count all four if it was for the correct candidate? (For
the record I voted for Leonard Peltier to be president) I've never seen an election so filled
with fraudulent opportunities as this one. The Repubs in turn have been caught all over the
place, in every election, scrubbing voter rolls, denying voting rights etc ..big surprise
.it's statistically in their favor to do so. Still the margins of victory in a number of key
states have been 1% – 2%. Hardly any kind of "mandate." Also an indication of how
difficult it is, even with widespread cheating, to overcome a genuinely popular (albeit
extremely odd) candidate.
If Trump had been an effective leader able to unify a real populist movement he would have
won in a landslide and a few % points would have been meaningless.
Hi Ah,
That the US deep state has been terrorising parts of the world for many years my reaction
before the election was to hope that Biden would win as I believed that would be the quickest
destruction of the terrorist deep state rather than with Trump where I believed it would
survive some time longer. It is inconceivable that any political party can survive in the US
without the backing of the 'deep state'.
Of course this makes the nuclear option more likely yet democrats are more attached to
their lives than many others since the profit motive looms larger.
Secondly the US owes the pension and social security systems so much money they do not
have unless they print, print and more print and hope someone will buy their bonds (over 100
trillion for the next 'x' years). That is not going to happen. That is why both political
parties will not endorse medicare for all or any further social security programmes. Those
with money insurance industries et al will run away to Australia that has more gold than it
knows what to do with the Chinese are now trying to buy Aussie gold mines. Wonder why?
To sum up the US population will experience some of the same terrorism tacticts the deep
state exported to the rest of the world while the same population will wonder why it is
happening to them just like some of the middle east countries wondered the same for the last
20 years. That the deep state and the army offer pensions and heathcare will not matter if
the funds are not there.
What are the options for the citizens that always believed in capitalism and Jesus and were
the single moral compass for the rest of humanity? After living in a Buddist country for many
years I am not so certain.
For whites the 50s and 60s were golden years. Full jobs, a salary allowed them to live
decently, to take care of themselves, to get an education, to go on vacation in an owned
cabin often in idyllic places. For blacks and Hispanics it was less fun. But with JFK, Nixon,
Bush father and now with Trump it is the 4th coup in 60 years.
Big capital has gone from a confrontation with the masses to a subjugation of the masses
by culture and the absence of real education. It is more or less the same in Europe, even in
Switzerland where I live, direct democracy is no longer a problem for the elites. Votes are
hijacked. When the army wants to make a strategic turn by no longer buying American planes, a
press campaign and a referendum launched by an anti-militarist association blocks the project
and contributes to destroying what remained of credibility to the army...
The document excoriates Trump for "reiterat[ing] false claims that 'we won this election,
and we won it by a landslide,'" and accuses him of "willfully [making] statements that,
in context, encouraged – and foreseeably resulted in – lawless action at the
Capitol." As for which statements actually incited the violence, the charges are vague,
mentioning only one line: "If you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country
anymore."
Democratic Representatives David Ciciline (Rhode Island), Ted Lieu (California), Jamie
Raskin (Maryland), and Jerry Nadler (New York) introduced the article, which reportedly has
more than 200 Democrat co-sponsors.
The House is planning to introduce a resolution to remove Trump using the 25th Amendment
later on Monday, according to Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Should that move to declare Trump unfit and
remove him from office not receive unanimous consent – a very likely outcome – it
would be taken up on the House floor, at which point Pelosi would call for Vice President Mike
Pence to respond "within 24 hours."
Should that fail as well, Pelosi said in a statement on Sunday, impeachment legislation will
be deployed once again. Trump was impeached in December 2019 for alleged abuse of power and
obstruction of Congress related to his conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelensky. However, the Senate did not vote to convict him.
Given that Trump is due to leave the White House later this month, some have questioned
whether another impeachment is overkill. However, some lawmakers are using last week's events
– which saw a horde of Trump supporters throng Washington DC and barge into the Capitol
while Congress was overseeing the counting of Electoral College votes – as the argument
that official reprimand isn't enough. Five people died as a result of the "storming" of
the Capitol, which Trump later denounced.
Trump's personal Twitter feed became another casualty of the chaotic events, with the
Silicon Valley giant claiming the "interpretation" of the president's posts could cause
further violence. Twitter's perma-ban of Trump and the purge of Trump-related conservative
accounts that followed were accompanied by the removal of the president from Facebook,
Snapchat, Twitch and other liberal-leaning tech platforms.
Thank you b for the Escobar/Hudson link. This proposition is interesting:
All of this [junk mortgage debt] was left on the books, foreclosed and sold to a private
capital companies like Blackstone. And the result is that home ownership in America
declined from 68 percent of the population down to about 61 percent. Well, right where the
Obama administration left off, you're about to have the Biden administration begin in
January with an estimated 5 million Americans losing their homes. They're going to be
evicted because they've been unemployed during the pandemic. They've been working in
restaurants or gyms or other industries that have been shut down because of the pandemic.
They're going to be evicted and many homeowners and, low-income homeowners have been unable
to pay their mortgages.
There's going to be a wave of foreclosures. The question is, who's going to bear the
cost? Should it be 15 million American families who lose their homes just so the banks
won't lose money? Or should we let the banks that have made all of the growth since 2008?
Ninety five percent of American GDP of the population has seen its wealth go down. All the
wealth has been accumulating for the 5 percent in statistics. Now the question is should
this 5 percent that's got all the wealth lose or should the 95 percent lose?
The Biden administration says the 95 percent should lose basically. And you're going to
see a wave of closures so that the question in China should be that, these intermediate
banks (they're not really banks they are sort of like payday loan lenders), should they
come in and, bear the loss or should Chinese localities and the people bear the loss?
Somebody has to lose when you're charging, you're collecting the land's rent that was paid
to the creditors, and either the creditors have to lose or, the tax collector loses and
that's the conflict that exists in every society of the world today.
Xerxes Biden and his pickpocket clown cart may part with a few $2000 dollar relief
payments to slow the mighty mortgage foreclosure/eviction rush. Will the clown cart maintain
that $2000 periodic payment for two years to get the Dimratss through the next election?
I doubt it but it would be good to see the people of the USA get a break.
Xerxes and team clown cart would have to rein in the military spend :) but that too could
be detrimental to them winning the mid term elections in two years. So I see Xerxes Biden
facing his very own waterloo here. For this lad to be suddenly jammed between a rock and a
hard place that he himself created by all his years of snuggling up to Repugnant legislation
and banksters and Obummers thieving manipulations, is a mighty fine view.
Biden will sell you out and the people will be destitute and the banksters will be
laughing - still. Time will tell.
since when has the usa, wall st, it's political class or anyone else in power in the usa
been concerned for the welfare of others, in particular brown skinned people in faraway
countries like yemen??? i don't recall.... you can watch how the posters here will focus on
the distraction of trump and dems doing this endless fucking stupid dance, but you can bet
no one will be expressing an interest in helping yemen... the usa is one sick nation and it
is no where more apparent then in them wanting to designate ansarallah as a terrorist
group... same shit from the same ignoramus's... thanks for drawing my attention to this
latest bullshit b..
Totally agree. The circle-jerk politics is hilarious. Too bad it is also tragic and cruel.
The Humpty Dumpty of US Society is not going back together again. Civil War 2.0 is here.
Grab your musket and sword, twitter flamethrower and Facebook napalm. Civil War 2.0 will be
televised, tweeted and live-streamed for all the world to see the result of bread and
circuses to a propagandized population at the end of history.
It's another one of those wars where the US supplies weapons to both sides. They pretend
that they were overrun by the rebels. This was done repeatedly in Iraq, Syria, Somalia,
Niger, Libya, and so on...
US attacks against the Houthis in Yemen seem to be bipartisan, and were happening under
Obama in 2009/2010, going by an Eric Margolis article from January 3, 2010 that refers to
"extensive covert U.S. military operations in Yemen."
"A military dictator, Ali Saleh, has held power since 1978. Saleh's U.S.-backed regime
is accused of extensive human rights violations and deep corruption."
"neighbour Oman, a virtual colony of MI6, British intelligence."
"U.S. warplanes killed 50-100 Yemeni tribesmen fighting the American-backed regime."
"U.S. special forces, warplanes and killer drones have been active since 2001,
assassinating Yemeni militants and anti-government tribal leaders."
So bipartisan since 2001, for at least two decades (Margolis started the article with
the line "Welcome to the Afghanistan of Arabia.") if not longer if the US-backed dictator
was in power since 1978 ...
"... On Thursday January 7, Trump gave another short speech in which, contradicting what he said before, he unambiguously condemned the attack on the Capitol as a threat to law and order, and promised to collaborate in the peaceful transition of power. Although he probably said this out of fear for his personal fate, this act just confirmed that he was and is a member of the establishment, not even a Rightist hero but a coward. ..."
... ... ...'Swamp' creature with a populist facade
As Yuval Kremnitzer demonstrated, Trump is a populist who remains within the system. Like
any populism, his version also distrusts political representation, pretending to speak directly
for the people – it complains about how its hands are tied by the 'deep state' and
financial establishment, so its message is: "if only we didn't have our hands tied, we would
be able to do away with our enemies once and for all."
However, in contrast to old authoritarian populism (like Fascism) which is ready to abolish
formal-representative democracy and really take over and impose a new order, today's populism
doesn't have a coherent vision of some new order – the positive content of its ideology
and politics is an inconsistent bricolage of measures to bribe "our own" poor, to lower
the taxes for the rich, to focus the hatred on the immigrants and our own corrupted elite
outsourcing jobs, etc. That's why today's populists don't really want to get rid of the
established representative democracy and fully take power: "without the 'fetters' of the
liberal order to struggle against, the new right would actually have to take some real
action," and this would render obvious the vacuity of their program. Today's populists can
only function in the indefinite postponement of achieving their goal since they can only
function as opposing the 'deep state' of the liberal establishment: "The new right does not,
at least not at this stage, seek to establish a supreme value – for instance, the nation,
or the leader – that would fully express the will of the people and thereby allow and
perhaps even require the abolition of the mechanisms of representation."
What this means is that the true victims of Trump are his ordinary supporters who take
seriously his babble against liberal corporate elites and big banks. He is the traitor of his
own populist cause. His liberal critics accuse him of just seemingly controlling his supporters
ready to violently fight for him, while he is really at their side, inciting them to act, even
violently. But he is NOT really ON their side. On the morning of January 6, he addressed the
rally on the Ellipse: "We're going to walk down to the Capitol. And we're gonna cheer on our
brave senators and congressmen and women. And we're probably not going to be cheering so much
for some of them, because you'll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show
strength and you have to be strong." However, when the mob did this and approached the
Capitol, Trump retreated to the White House and watched on television as the violence unfolded
on Capitol Hill.
Unmasking fake democracy
Did Trump really want to effect a coup d'etat? Unambiguously, NO. When the mob penetrated
the Capitol, he made a statement: "I know your pain, I know your hurt. We had an election
that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the
other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and
order." Trump blamed his opponents for the violence and praised his supporters, saying,
"We can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love
you; you're very special."
And when the mob began to disperse, Trump posted a tweet defending the actions of his
supporters who stormed and vandalized the Capitol: "These are the things and events that
happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped
away." He concluded his tweet with: "Remember this day forever!" Yes, we should
– because it displayed the fakeness of US democracy as well as the fakeness of the
populist protest against it. Just a few elections in the US really mattered – like the
California gubernatorial election in 1934: the Democratic candidate Upton Sinclair lost because
the entire establishment organized a previously unheard-of campaign of lies and defamations
(Hollywood announced that, if Sinclair wins, it will move to Florida, etc.).
On Thursday January 7, Trump gave another short speech in which, contradicting what he said
before, he unambiguously condemned the attack on the Capitol as a threat to law and order, and
promised to collaborate in the peaceful transition of power. Although he probably said this out
of fear for his personal fate, this act just confirmed that he was and is a member of the
establishment, not even a Rightist hero but a coward. No wonder masses of his fans are already
describing him as a "traitor," a part of the Washington "swamp" he'd promised to
clear. This, of course, doesn't mean that his supporters are in any sense progressives betrayed
by Trump: they expressed their actual grievances in a Rightist populist way. There is a grain
of truth in their complaints, but they themselves betrayed it by the form of their activity.
Crazy as it may sound, if they mean it seriously, they should join Bernie Sanders.
The furious, dissatisfied crowd attacking the parliament on behalf of a popular president
deprived of his power through parliamentary manipulations sounds familiar? Yes: this should
have happened in Brazil or in Bolivia – there, the crowd of the president's supporters
would have the full right to storm the parliament and re-install their president. A totally
different game was going on in the US. So let's hope that what happened on January 6 in
Washington will at least stop the obscenity of the US sending observers to elections in other
countries to judge their fairness – now the US elections themselves need foreign
observers. The US is a rogue country, and not just when Trump became its President: the ongoing
(almost) civil war displays a rift that was there all the time.
"... The military would support whomever pays their salary and their pensions, i.e. the Establishment. However, as Iraq and Afghanistan has shown, the U.S. military, while possessing remarkable firepower when taken on directly and openly, is quite vulnerable. The U.S. military is essentially mercenaries. Mercenaries work for pay. Mercenaries are not willing to die for a cause. You can't spend money if you're dead. ..."
As a person who grew up in the glorious aftermath of World War II, it never occurred to me
that in my later years I would be pondering whether the United States would end in civil war or
a police state. In the aftermath of the stolen presidential election, it seems a 50-50 toss
up.
There is abundant evidence of a police state. One feature of a police state is controlled
explanations and the suppression of dissent. We certainly have that in abundance.
Experts are not permitted forums in which to challenge the official position on Covid.
Teachers are suspended for giving offense by using gender pronouns.
Recording stars are dropped by their recording studios for attending the Trump rally.
Parents ratted on by their own children are fired from their jobs for attending the Trump
rally. https://www.rt.com/usa/512048-capitol-riot-employees-fired/
Antifa is free to riot, loot, intimidate and hassle, but Trump supporters are
insurrectionists.
White people are racists who use hateful words and concepts, but those who demonize whites
are righting wrongs.
Suppression of dissent and controlling behavior are police state characteristics. It might
be less clear to some why dictating permissible use of language is police state control. Think
about it this way. If your use of pronouns can be controlled, so can your use of all other
words. As concepts involve words, they also can be controlled. In this way inconvenient
thoughts and expressions along with accurate descriptions find their way into the Memory
Hole.
With the First Amendment gone, or restricted to the demonization of targeted persons, such
as "the Trump Deplorables," "white supremacists," "Southern racists," the Second Amendment
can't have much life left. As guns are associated with red states, that is, with Trump
supporters, outlawing guns is a way to criminalize the red half of the American population that
the Establishment considers "deplorable." Those who stand on their Constitutional right will be
imprisoned and become cheap prison labor for America's global corporations.
Could all this lead to a civil war or are Americans too beat down to effectively resist?
That we won't know until it is put to the test.
Are there clear frontlines? Identity Politics has divided the people across the entire
country. The red states are only majority red. It is tempting to see the frontiers as the red
center against the blue Northeast and West coasts, but that is misleading. Georgia is a red
state with a red governor and legislature, but there were enough Democrats in power locally to
steal the presidential and US senate elections.
Another problem for reds is that large cities -- the distribution centers -- such as
Atlanta, Detroit, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los
Angeles -- are in blue hands as are ports and international airports. Effectively, this cuts
reds off from outside resources.
What would the US military do? Clearly, the Joint Chiefs and the military/security complex
are establishment and not anti-establishment Trumpers. With the soldiers themselves now a
racial and gender mix, the soldiers would be as divided as the country. Those not with the
Establishment would lack upper level support.
Where are the youth and younger adults? They are in both camps depending on their education.
Many of the whites who went to university have been brainwashed against themselves, and regard
white Americans as "systemic racists" or "white supremacists" and feel guilt. Those who did not
go to university for the most part have experienced to their disadvantage the favoritism given
to people of color and have resentment.
What about weapons? How can the reds lose when guns are a household item and blues would
never dirty themselves by owning one? The answer is that unlike the War of Northern Aggression
in the 1860s, today the weapons in the hands of the military are devastating compared to those
in the hands of the public. Unlike in the past, it is impossible for a citizens' militia to
stand against the weapons and body armor that the military has. So, unless the military splits,
the reds are outgunned. Never believe that the Establishment would not release chemical and
biological agents against red forces. Or for that matter nuclear weapons.
What about communications? We know for an absolute fact that the tech monopolies are aligned
with the Establishment against the people. So much so that President Trump, in the process of
being set-up for prosecution, has been cut off from communicating with his supporters both in
social media and email.
The American Establishment is doing to President Trump exactly what it did to Ukrainian
President Yanukovych in Washington's orchestrated "Maidan Revolution," called "the Revolution
of Dignity" by the liars at Wikipedia, and precisely what it did to Chavez, Maduro, and would
like to do to Putin.
Suppose an American civil war occurs. How is it likely to play out? Before investigating
this, first consider how the Establishment could prevent it by bringing the red states to its
defense. The Trump supporters are the only patriots in the American population. They tend to
wear the flag on their sleeve. In contrast, blue state denizens define patriotism as
acknowledging America's evils and taking retribution on those white racists/imperialists who
committed the evils. In blue states, riots against the "racist system" result in defunding the
police. If the Antifa and Black Lives Matter militias were sicced on the Biden regime, red
state patriots might see "their country" under attack. It is possible that the "Proud Boys"
would come to Biden's defense, not because they believe in Biden but because America is under
attack and he is "our president." Alternatively, an Antifa attack on the Biden regime could be
portrayed as an unpatriotic attack on America and be used to discourage red state opposition to
the police state, just as "Insurrection" has resulted in many Trump supporters declaring their
opposition to violence. In other words, it is entirely possible that the patriotism of the
"Trump Deplorables" would split the red state opposition and lead to defeat.
Assuming that the Establishment is too arrogant and sure of itself or too stupid to think of
this ploy, how would a civil war play out? The Establishment would do everything possible to
discredit the case of the "rebels." The true rebels, of course, would be the Establishment
which has overthrown the Constitutional order, but no media would make that point. Controlling
the media, the Establishment, knowing of the patriotism of its opponents, would portray the
"rebels" as foreign agents seeking to overthrow American Democracy.
The "foreign threat" always captures the patriot's attention. We see it right now with Trump
supporters falling for the disinformation that Switzerland and Italy are behind the stolen
election. Previously, it was Dominion servers in Germany and Serbia that did the deed.
On whose head will the Establishment place the blame for "the War Against America"? There
are three candidates: Iran, China, and Russia. Which will the Establishment choose?
To give Iran credit conveys too much power to a relatively small country over America. To
blame Iran for our civil war would be belittling.
To blame China won't work, because Trump blamed China for economically undermining America
and Trump supporters are generally anti-China. So accusing the red opposition with being China
agents would not work.
The blame will be placed on Russia.
This is the easy one. Russia has been the black hat ever since Churchill's Iron Curtain
speech in 1946. Americans are accustomed to this enemy. The Cold War reigned from the end of
World War II until the Soviet Collapse in 1991. Many, including retired American generals,
maintain that the Soviet collapse was faked to put us off guard for conquest.
When the Establishment decided to frame President Trump, the Establishment chose Russia as
Trump's co-conspirator against American Democracy. Russiagate, orchestrated by the CIA and FBI,
ensured for three years that Trump was accused in the Western media of being in cahoots with
Russia. Despite the lack of any evidence, a large percentage of the American and world
population was convinced that Trump was put into office by Putin somehow manipulating the
vote.
The brainwashing was so successful that three years of Trump sanctions against Russia could
not shake the Western peoples back into factual reality.
With Russia as the historic and orchestrated enemy, whatever happens in the United States
that can be blamed elsewhere will be blamed on Russia. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, former US
Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul, and former Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes
have already associated "Trump's insurrection" with Russia. https://www.rt.com/russia/512071-capitol-violence-consequences-fear/
Suppose that an American civil war becomes intense. Suppose that the Establishment's
propaganda against Russia becomes the reigning belief as propaganda almost always becomes, how
can the Establishment not finish the insurrection threat by attacking the country responsible?
The Establishment would be trapped in its own propaganda. Emotions would run away. Russia would
hear threats that would have to be taken seriously.
You can bet that Biden's neocon government will be egging this on. American exceptionalism.
American hegemony. Russia's fifth column, the Atlanticist Integrationists, who wish absorption
into the degenerate and failing Western World, will echo the charges against Russia. This would
make the situation a serious international incident with Russia as the threatened villain.
What would the Kremlin do? Would Russia's leaders accept yet another humiliation and false
accusation? Or will the anger of the Russian people forever accused and never stood up for by
their own government force the Kremlin into awareness that Russia could be attacked at any
moment.
Even if the Kremlin is reluctant to acknowledge the threat of war, what if another of the
numerous false warnings of incoming ICBMs is received. Unlike the past, is it believed this
time?
The stolen election in America, the emerging American Police State, more vicious and better
armed than any in the past, could result in American chaos that could be a dire threat to the
Russian Federation.
What Trump and his supporters, and perhaps the Kremlin, do not understand is that real
evidence no longer counts . The Establishment makes up the evidence that it needs for its
agendas. Consider how easy it was for the Capitol Police to remove barriers and allow some
Antifa mixed in with Trump supporters into the Capitol. This was all that was required to
create a "Trump led insurrection" that terminated the presentation of evidence of electoral
fraud and turned the massive rally of support for Trump into a liability. Trump now leaves the
presidency as an "insurrectionist" and is set up for continued harassment and prosecution.
As I previously wrote, the stolen election and its acceptance abroad signifies the failure
of Western democracy. The collapse of the Western world and its values will affect the entire
world.
No member of the State wants to be picked off one by one, be it military, cops, leadership
or functionaries.
What has been overlooked in the debate over the combat potential of violent extremists
is the diffusion of something much more rudimentary and potentially more lethal: basic
infantry skills. These include coordinated small-team tactical maneuvers supported by
elementary marksmanship. The diffusion of such tactics seems to be underway, and it may
generate serious concerns for U.S. security policy in the future if ignored.
Imagine if fuel pipe lines to urban areas were hit, railroad tracks hit, water processing
facilities hit; the vision of an easy victory over Red America would quickly come home to the
city dwellers.
Elections in the US are not about picking winners. They are about making voters complicit
in governance by their having voted. The most recent election failed to make the Red voters
"complict" because there was no transparency and everyone believes there was fraud. No
election with mail in voting in the US will every work because everyone will assume
fraud.
In a nation as large as the US with as much concentrated city living, logistics are a
nightmare. The next time the lights go out, you may wonder. When your grocery chain runs out
of meat, you may wonder. When sewers in your city keep breaking, you may wonder. Thus truly
scares me.
today the weapons in the hands of the military are devastating compared to those in the
hands of the public
True enough. However, the weapons and the ammunition don't magically appear; they need to
be manufactured somewhere, and those places (and/or their suppliers) can be destroyed.
I must disagree. There will be no "civil war" in the United States. The establishment
controls the levers of power and all communications and all organized structures. There may
be a bunch of disaffected citizens, but they will remain a disorganized mob. Any apparent
emergent rival for power will be ruthlessly suppressed, deplatformed, villified, or co-opted.
The working class has been effectively divided and will waste its energy fighting itself over
crumbs ('diversity').
Disorganized mobs do not fight civil wars.
No, the fate of the United States will be the sort of chaotic autocracy we see in places
like Mexico and Brazil. Verging on being a failed state, the rich will nonetheless live lives
of great luxury secure in their walled estates. Meanwhile the average person will be crushed
into poverty, criminal gangs will flourish, and there will be a tension between the central
police and local gangs, but gangs are rarely organized enough to truly challenge centralized
states, and life will muddle on. There will be little social cohesion and no real trust of
central authorities, but that only matters if you want a strong and unified society. The rich
will do fine.
On the other hand, the overall national power will decline, and other powers like China
(which for all its flaws has not declared war on the working class, nor does it routinely
excuse or celebrate incompetence in leadership) will rise and take its place both on the
world stage and as the cutting edge of science and culture.
to me the biggest outcome of this faux coup/insurrection is the splintering of the
republican party. with this schism the trump "populists" have been cleanly pared off of the
party and thrown overboard and the remaining party will meekly do the bidding of the neocon
deep state that now totally controls both of these sock puppet parties. we will now see both
parties calling for a unification of our "indispensable nation". more than likely some false
flag will provide the necessary impetus to bury the hatchet and focus us all on our new/old
enemy. the only hope i see is an outside chance that so many republicans have been redpilled
that the party becomes the new whigs and fades into obscurity, leaving room for new parties
to rise from the ash. the dems are ripe for a schism themselves with aoc champing at the bit
to kick the boomers to the curb and the bernie bros finally realizing that three card monty
is a rigged game. i would love to see the destruction of both of these hopelessly corrupt
parties but the deep state cthulhu has its tentacles thoroughly wrapped around our poor
planet and anything emerging out of this toxic mess would most likely be even worse. the
situation reminds me of voltaire's candide and his sage advice to cultivate your garden.
I'd advise the young to develop a "plan B". Pick another country you find bearable amd
study it. Find out what jobs are in demand there. Develop those skills in your spare time
(computers, electricians, mechanics, etc.). Practice their language an hour or two per week
with online resources/dvd's/books. Research their immigration laws and perhaps contact their
embassy.
If it gets really awful for whites here, you may be able to take your family some place
more hospitable. Hopefully none of this will be neccessary and the rhetoric will tone down.
Trump personally really got under the left's skin. Don't umderestimate Hillary's supporters
influence here. They were ticked off. The Obama's too. Perhaps they will calm down a notch
now. Have a plan B though young whites.
Another insightful article by PCR. However, I must somewhat disagree on some points.
What would the US military do?
The military would support whomever pays their salary and their pensions, i.e. the
Establishment. However, as Iraq and Afghanistan has shown, the U.S. military, while
possessing remarkable firepower when taken on directly and openly, is quite vulnerable. The
U.S. military is essentially mercenaries. Mercenaries work for pay. Mercenaries are not
willing to die for a cause. You can't spend money if you're dead.
Think of the Troubles in Ireland.
The Establishment absolutely can deliver a punch to an identifiable opponent, but it can't
take a punch. Low level violence directed at officers and politicians would bring them to
their knees.
Controlling the media, the Establishment, knowing of the patriotism of its opponents,
would portray the "rebels" as foreign agents seeking to overthrow American Democracy.
I agree that they will try. However, I suspect that PCR is underestimating how little
faith many whites have in the media.
The Establishment will never be more powerful than it is today. They have inherited
institutions, the people to man those institutions and a generally functioning economy.
Basically, they stole the keys to car that they didn't create. But the Establishment run
those institutions and economy into ground. They will slowly start to show cracks.
Whites need to stay low, start forming small groups and begin preparing for the openings
that will come.
The racial right has been fantasizing about a civil war since forever, but I can't see it.
Too many people have too much to lose, there's no real desire for blood, and the people are
anyway too soft to initiate or withstand the violence real war would unleash upon them.
Further, and in stark contrast to the SJWs and antifa, the few racially conscious whites who
fantasize about this are mostly too old to make good soldiers. Also, just like the "God
emperor" himself, Trumpers are some of the stupidest people on the face of the earth, largely
down with their own enslavement, nauseatingly fond of "law and order", sporting "Blue Lives
Matter" badges, etc. Despite being preyed upon by blacks and browns for decades now, they
still refuse to become racist. Most of them are Bible thumpers who really believe that race
is just skin color, that all are equal before their imaginary friend called God, and that
Israel is America's greatest ally. Then too, vast numbers of whites work for the government
or its many offshoots such as education, law enforcement, the military, and the defense
industry. Civil war would mean they'd be revolting against themselves.
Will America become a police state? In case you haven't noticed, Americans already
live in a police state, and have for decades. PCR should know this as well as anyone, as he
was part of it during the Reagan years. America is an open-air prison Americans built
themselves, and they rat each other out and betray each other to keep themselves
ideologically in line. When someone white is doxxed and fired for having bad thoughts, who do
you think does the enforcing? For the most part, it's other white people. Fake president and
China asset Biden is just the new warden.
As a person who grew up in the glorious aftermath of World War II, it never occurred to
me that in my later years I would be pondering whether the United States would end in civil
war or a police state. In the aftermath of the stolen presidential election, it seems a
50-50 toss up.
In a very meaningful sense we already have a "police state." Why do we have a police
state? Because our masters realize that they can't run the whole world from anything
resembling a constitutional republic (as the Founders and Framers envisioned it). It's the
agenda for complete world domination and control that's driving the domestic oppression. As
they continue to squander everything of value on the agenda and take more risks, etc., while
the corruption and rot continue to take a toll and the country crumbles, the boot will need
to come down ever harder on the neck.
And please stop kidding yourself about Trump. It wasn't for the benefit of Joe and Jill
Sixpack that he seized Syrian oilfields, tried to start a war with Iran, tried to overthrow
the Maduro government in Venezuela, tried to stop Nord Stream 2, started a trade war with
China, pulled out of all the nuclear treaties, etc. Trump wasn't just fully onboard with the
agenda, he pursued it enthusiastically.
If Trump's nuclear brinkmanship and aggressive foreign policies aren't promptly reversed,
the U.S. may end as a pile of nuclear ash. Comments coming out of Moscow recently seem to
suggest that Russia is finally losing its patience with interminable U.S. hostility and may
soon start responding more forcefully to U.S./NATO provocations (and Biden's tough talk on
Russia isn't helping matters any).
Neither Russia, China nor Iran are going to surrender to the USraeli empire and start
taking orders, so either the U.S. "government" must back off and accept a multipolar world or
WW3 is still on the table, even by accident.
From Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War.
The Civil War in Corcyra
"So savage was the progress of this revolution, and it seemed all the more so because it
was one of the first which had broken out. Later, of course, practically the whole of the
Hellenic world was convulsed, with rival parties in every state – democratic leaders
trying to bring in the Athenians, and oligarchs trying to bring in the Spartans. In peacetime
there would have been no excuse and no desire for calling them in, but in time of war, when
each party could always count upon an alliance which would do harm to its opponents and at
the same time strengthen its own position, it became a natural thing for anyone who wanted a
change of government to call in help from outside.
So revolutions broke out in city after city, and in places where the revolutions occurred
late the knowledge of what had happened previously in other places caused still new
extravagances of revolutionary zeal, expressed by an elaboration in the methods of seizing
power and by unheard-of atrocities in revenge. To fit in with the change of events, words,
too, had to change their usual meanings . What used to be described as a thoughtless act
of aggression was now regarded as the courage one would expect to find in a party member; to
think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was a coward; any idea
of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one's unmanly character ; ability to
understand a question from all sides meant that one was totally unfitted for action.
Fanatical enthusiasm was the mark of a real man, and to plot against an enemy behind his back
was perfectly legitimate self-defence. Anyone who held violent opinions could always be
trusted, and anyone who objected to them became a suspect. To plot successfully was a sign of
intelligence, but it was still cleverer to see that a plot was hatching. If one attempted to
provide against having to do either, one was disrupting the unity of the party and acting out
of fear of the opposition. In short, it was equally praiseworthy to get one's blow in first
against someone who was going to do wrong, and to denounce someone who had no intention of
doing any wrong at all. Family relations were a weaker tie than party membership ,
since party members were more ready to go to any extreme for any reason whatever. These
parties were not formed to enjoy the benefits of the established laws, but to acquire power
by overthrowing the existing regime ; and the members of these parties felt confidence in
each other not because of any fellowship in a religious communion, but because they were
partners in crime. If an opponent made a reasonable speech, the party in power, so far from
giving it a generous reception, took every precaution to see that it had no practical
effect.
As the result of these revolutions, there was a general deterioration of character
throughout the Greek world . The simple way of looking at things, which is so much the
mark of a noble nature, was regarded as a ridiculous quality and soon ceased to exist.
Society had become divided into two ideologically hostile camps , and each side viewed
the other with suspicion. As for ending this state of affairs, no guarantee could be given
that would be trusted, no oath sworn that people would fear to break; everyone had come to
the conclusion that it was hopeless to expect a permanent settlement and so, instead
of being able to feel confident in others, they devoted their energies to providing against
being injured themselves."
Whether civil war as we may imagine it, or something equally unappealing to our every day
lives, something bad is about to happen.
I'm curious though, regarding what I do believe was unprecedented election fraud. How is
it possible, after watching the Georgia State Farm arena video, that the President of the
United States, with all the power that office should hold, could not force the woman
identified in that video, one Ruby Freeman, to answer questions about what we saw? Ruby
Freeman was never questioned as far as I can find. How is this possible? Nothing makes sense.
Before we begin killing one another, can we do two things; 1. Interrogate Ruby Freeman and 2.
Interrogate the killer of Ashli Babbit?
Little bit feverish article. And I do have to say no.
Civil war can happen only after hyperinflation accompanied with lawlessness.
And that will happen only if US looses its international position.
Everything depend now on Germany.
If Germany joins China Russia camp than US as a world leader will not mean anything
anymore.
China now is courting Europe intensively. Particularly is courting Germany.
Nothing is set yet.
So everybody can relax.
.
Biden is out of his mind. In his speech he said that he wants to increase minimum wage and
reestablish unions. That could be a little help also.
People living in the core areas of Ziocorporate globalism, like the US/EU, remain mostly
oblivious about the nature of their ruling regime than those living in the direct periphery
of globalist power. Take Colombia for an example, like Mexico's, all its presidents are
subservient to US Ziocorporate power. Last one, a Nobel peace prize winner under whose
pre-presidential stint as "Defense" minister oversaw the US-serving Colombian military's
systematic massacre of tens of thousands of lower class Colombian youths who were then
disguised as guerrillas to cash in rewards paid US Plan Colombia dollars, proceeded, now as
president, to negotiate the disarmament of the actual guerrillas under the Obama/Biden
regime's orders. Massmurder and massacres maintained an average level.
Then, in 2018, right after the Trumpet, a shamelessly pro-US regime, even for Colombian
standards, took over and massacres and massmurder picked right up again, to an average of 2
or 3 per week, with exploding cocaine production even for Colombia standards as well, and
extreme political polarisation, and all the while the Ziocorporate mother ship in Washington,
with its Qtard and MAGA bullshit, looked the other way except to accuse Venezuela of being
undemocratic and of human rights violations.
If Americans weren't so stupid and daydreaming like fucktards that they live in "muh
democracy/republic" instead of the Ziocorporate conglomerate regime that rules over them,
they could take a clue or two from their own regime's foreign policy, not only did Trumpet do
things like transferring $400 billion in weapons to ISIS/al-Qaeda royal Salafi patrons in
Ziodi Wahhabia, he doubled-down on the Obama/Biden policy of Venezuela "is a national
security threat to muh democracy and freedom"; to start pondering about the kind of
manipulation and radicalisation Ziocorporate agents Trump/Republicans and Biden/Democrats
have in store for them. Cointelpro certainly mutates far faster than Covid-1984.
What do Qtarts and the like need to realise this simple, evident facts? That the Trumpet
himself comes on national TV telling you all "I and the Democrats have been playing divide
and conquer with you dumbfucks for 4 years"?
The American Establishment is doing to President Trump exactly what it did to Ukrainian
President Yanukovych in Washington's orchestrated "Maidan Revolution," called "the
Revolution of Dignity" by the liars at Wikipedia, and precisely what it did to Chavez,
Maduro, and would like to do to Putin.
What Trump and his supporters, and perhaps the Kremlin, do not understand is that
real evidence no longer counts . The Establishment makes up the evidence that it
needs for its agendas.
Their playbook "Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals" by Saul D.
Alinsky, makes it clear that it's necessary to play dirty. This covers all aspects of their
Regime Change projects and the current US project surely isn't any different.
It's a cocktail of lies, fabrications, subversion, threats, blackmail, false friendships
– in fact any means to advance themselves.
For example: From Alinsky – "Means and Ends" His take on morality:
Rule 10) You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments.
Rule 11) Goals must be phrased in general terms like "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity", "Of
the Common Welfare, "Pursuit of Happiness" or "Bread and Peace".
So yes, this is why the most unpatriotic Patriot Act is called the Patriot Act and they
operate from patriotic sounding places like the American Enterprise Institute.
If traditional America is going to get anywhere in the upcoming conflict they have to get
used to playing by the same rules – difficult for them – but they have to do it.
It's inevitably going to be a dirty war.
Point of order- Russia is not the historic enemy, but the orchestrated one, rather it was
the Soviet Union which is the historic enemy, as the sponsors of the destruction of Russia
are behind the destruction of America.
We are already in a police state and you can kiss goodbye to the 1st and 2nd amendment
soon as free speech becomes hate speech just like they did in Europe.
So this site and many others in the alt news universe will soon be gone.
There's not going to be a civil war as the current generation of young people are too weak
and distracted and have been brainwashed into hating themselves.
There's a big elephant in the room and wild card that's been missed too and that's the new
covid vaccines who's long term effects on health are unknown.
Vaccines need to be studied for about 10 years before their safety can be guaranteed.
If tens / hundreds of millions are willing to be injected with a new untested genetic
engineered substance that could make them disabled or kill them in 5 years to save them
against something with a 99% survival rate what does that tell you about the mental state of
the Population?
The US as you once knew it is finished it's just that many are still in denial or haven't
realized it yet.
I see no civil war in the USA. I see no organisation amongst the people in order to carry
it out. They have no leader, they have no Hannibal, Boadicea or Adolf to rally them together
for a major insurrection against The Beast Empire. Unless of course something is brewing
secretly.
A French style form of resistance, as previously mentioned in these comments, also takes a
lot of planning and organisational skills, and I see no inkling of that taking place amongst
American patriots.
I also believe many do not realise how serious the matter is, they still, being bogged
down in irrelevant party politics.
If however a large swathe of the police and US Military including officers were to desert
their corrupt masters, things would look very different and a civil war could happen.
The civil was has been on since Crossfire Hurricane, the usurpers of the constitution
simply kept it cold because they thought they could enforce their tyranny silently.
And if Trump surrenders then they would have been proven right, at least for the
leadership fight.
Biden will likely launch a war because he already has his bay of pigs with his graft, and
will need a moonshot for the misdirection.
I don't think they can fight half the nation (and the military will split), and Russia at
the same time, so the only question is on whom the war will be launched. I still think the
odds are higher that it will be a civil war, but the Russia option looms strong for sure.
The US military is the most "woke" diverse incompetent organization in America.
Remember- contractors do all the heavy lifting "in theater"- from cooking to plumbing to
firefighting to IT to combat.
This knowledge is hidden from view- kept on the down low.I only know because my brother
has worked in Iraq and Afghanistan for KBR for the past 15 years. I have seen him accumulate
well over Half a million in cash. What does he do? He makes sure the troops have water and
food. He is in logistics. For the past decade I have heard hundreds if not thousands of
stories of the jaw dropping incompetence, insouciance and laziness of the American
military.
Rank-and-file Americans, indeed no one, talks about this very real infrastructure that
props up every dumb, overweight enlisted. About 4 contractors to every enlisted.
Most of the contractors in theater are from Eastern Europe and sub Sahara Africa. If they
were given orders to release biological or chemical weapons on the American populace, as long
as the huge checks were hitting their account they would do it in a heartbeat
More than the military- fear the shadow military that knows the systems, does the work ..
And will do whatever it is asked as long as they are paid.
Their mother doesn't live here.
Everywhere we turn, diversity and hiring people from the "other" never works out.
*** Side note: My brother revealed that when blacks came back from their R&R after the
George Floyd insanity, most of them became more aggressive and entitled. Unable to do their
work because they could not stop going to report others for incidence of racism.
This includes the American black contractors and enlisted.
These are dumb young black men and women who are making $92,000 a year to move pallets
around. If they were asked to stop calling in sick every day, they would run to report their
supervisor for-
Racism.
Many whites have lost their lucrative positions or been subject to discipline for having
the audacity to ask blacks to come to work.
There is nothing special about Dominion. The key question is whether computer based voting
machines have the right to exist or not. Do they do any good or they are just unnessery and ripe
with potential of new forms of fraud overhead, driven by unscrupulous lobbists? That is the
question.
The ides of using consumer (or small business office, if you wish) class software and
hardware in those machines is also open to review. Military class Sever have special OS (Trusted
Solaris, OpenBSD, etc), special mechanism to prevent manipulation of binaries (md5 checksums,
mirroring on non violate media, etc), special means to prevent abuse by rogue sysadmins (dual
sysadmin mode necessary to become root, special access rules excluding areas that should not be
manipulated (AppArmor), etc. Windows based servers an, desktops and tables are consumer class
devices that can't be secured on public network to say nothing about election network where
multiple powerful actors (including intelligence agencies; both foreign and domestic ) have
strong stimulus to interfere. This is a struggle for power and it is typically dirty.
Venezuela is a weak point for Powell. As for "there was no widespread fraud in the election"
your mileage may vary. Mail-in fraud almost certainly was "widespread" as in practiced in many
battleground states. Weakening mail-in voting laws was a part of the scheme. What role direct
manipulation of votes by appointed administrators (several at each precept and counting center
(centralize counting is ripe area for fraud, especially good, old injection of votes, just due to
total amount of votes processed), If they can act along without and external control this created
several interesting questions, which needs to be answered by relevant tech investigations.
Ability to scan the same batch of ballots several times, as several election observers
complained, also needs to be blocked, and this is not an easy thing to do.
I have impression that when invalid ballot is adjudicated by the administrator a new ballot
is printed. It looks like adjudication does not leave any paper trial or set of images to
compare. That means that recount will not detect any manipulation. If true, that opens a wide
field for manipulation of votes by rogue administrators including setting scanner to jekect more
votes then nessesary creaing a pool of votes to manipulate. .
She has claimed that the company was created in Venezuela to rig elections for the late
leader Hugo Chavez and that it has the ability to switch votes.
There was no widespread fraud in the election, which a range of election officials across
the country including Trump's former attorney general, William Barr, have confirmed. Republican
governors in Arizona and Georgia, key battleground states crucial to Biden's victory, also
vouched for the integrity of the elections in their states. Nearly all the legal challenges
from Trump and his allies have been dismissed by judges, including two tossed by the Supreme
Court, which includes three Trump-nominated justices.
The company said there "there are mountains of direct evidence that conclusively disprove
Powell's vote manipulation claims against Dominion -- namely, the millions of paper ballots
that were audited and recounted by bipartisan officials and volunteers in Georgia and other
swing states, which confirmed that Dominion accurately counted votes on paper ballots."
Dominion said that when it formally told Powell her claims were false and asked her to
retract them, she "doubled down," using her Twitter account with more than 1 million followers
to amplify the claims.
US
President Donald Trump has been banned from most social media platforms, supposedly for
inciting riots at the Capitol. But with no one capable of holding the tech behemoths to
account, even fervent Trump-haters should worry.
Twitter permanently banned the president from its platform on Friday, following in the
footsteps of Facebook, Snapchat, Twitch, and other platforms that used Wednesday's riot at the
Capitol as an excuse to do what much of Silicon Valley has wanted to do for years.
But it wasn't Trump's on-platform conduct that was the problem, according to Twitter –
it was "how [his tweets] are being received and interpreted on and off Twitter," a post
on the company's blog declared on Friday. The platform then interpreted two seemingly innocuous
tweets – regarding not attending Democrat President-elect Joe Biden's inauguration and
giving his fans a "GIANT VOICE long into the future" – as a call to arms directed
at his supporters, far out-crazying the so-called "conspiracy theorists" Twitter has
also sought to deplatform.
Logically speaking, it's impossible for anyone – especially a public figure like Trump
– to control how his words are being interpreted, or even who's reading them to begin
with. For Twitter to translate the president's praise of his supporters and promise not to
attend his successor's inauguration into a call for violence requires a full-on break with
reality.
But platforms like Twitter, and especially Facebook, have been declaring all-out war on
reality for years now, merely ramping up hostilities in the wake of the Capitol riot. On
Facebook, even just sharing footage of Wednesday's riot was off-limits, as was posting Trump's
speech to his supporters. Any call for further protests, no matter how peaceful, was also
targeted for removal.
These platforms' notorious echo chambers have no room for dissenting narratives, whether it
concerns the Capitol protests or the growing contingent of Covid-19 dissenters crying foul as
lockdowns drag on (and cases go up) with no end in sight. And while a Trump-scale individual
may be able to create their own means of addressing the people, thousands of others have been
wiped out over the past year for political or public-health wrongthink.
The narrative managers are unlikely to stop at wiping their ideological nemeses off the
internet, either.
Perhaps emboldened by social media's iron-fisted approach to building its own alternate
reality, New Jersey assemblyman Paul Moriarty has been lobbying cable TV providers to stop
carrying conservative channels like Newsmax, OANN, and Fox News.
Missouri Senator Josh Hawley (R) had a book deal revoked for
challenging the results of November's elections.
Social media, once sold as a tool for promoting democracy and giving ordinary people a voice
they previously lacked, revealed its true identity over the course of 2020. Whether attempting
to delete records of an entire event, as Facebook has done with the Capitol protests, or
memory-holing inconvenient
facts about the Covid-19 pandemic, the 'new and improved' reality crafted by the media
establishment provides the ideal foundation for the police state being constructed around the
human mind.
The average person might go through life unaware this invisible thought-barrier is even
there – but anyone who steps out of line is quickly zapped back into obedience. And if
they refuse to cooperate even then? Deplatforming, in an age where face-to-face contact has
gone the way of the dodo, is the modern equivalent of 'disappearing' dissidents in broad
daylight.
Indeed, these platforms have merged with government in too many ways to count here. Those
who express political 'wrongthink' online aren't just disappeared from the digital public
square – they can be barred from supposedly apolitical apps like AirBnB, or even
denied the use
of their bank accounts.
The US constitution does not permit the government to punish individuals who aren't even
suspected of committing a crime. Nor does it permit the suppression of lawful speech or allow
authorities to paw through private citizens' lives in the hope of turning up something
incriminating. But private corporations – as the neoliberal center never tires of
reminding us – can do what they like, including depriving Americans of their First and
Fourth Amendment rights. Such capabilities explain why Washington has looked the other way for
so many years while Facebook, Google, Twitter, and Amazon became preposterously huge, insanely
profitable monopolies.
But the joke's on the government, in this case. With hundreds of billions of dollars at
their disposal, and a user-base trained to embrace their mental slavery with a positively
Pavlovian response, Big Tech seems to have realized it no longer has to pretend to play nice
with Big Government.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
@84:
As sometimes said: don't sweat the small stuff.
This "We are all Taiwanese now" stunt is Pompeo's act of petty spite for getting outfoxed in
the Hong Kong colour revolution play.
Empire's useful idiots were let loose to trash the hapless city, fired up by the Western
propaganda machinery.
Now Beijing is putting the stock on those pompous minions with the National Security Law, and
their foreign masters can't do nuffin' except squeal human rights and apply some nuisance
sanctions.
The West fails because it looks at China through ideological lenses and sees Communists, who
can fall back on 5000 years of statecraft to push back at interlopers.
Beijing's moves can be likened to two classic strategies.
1. Zhuge Liang fools the enemy to fire all their arrows at straw men, which become ammunition
against them.
2. The Empty City strategy. Invaders take over an ostensibly abandoned city, only to be
trapped inside.
Global Times is cantankerous and sometimes risible, but even a broken clock is right, twice a
day.
So when it says that crossing Beijing's red line on the Taiwan issue is not in the island's
best interests, the incoming BiMala administration should take note.
This is "V for vendetta" from neoliberal Dems. They at last got Trump...
While ZH commenters are too harsh on Biden who currently is sitting between two chairs, it
will be extremely difficult for Biden and his administration to navigate this minefield.
He really might face a national strike despite docile character of white working class... And
no in no way Trump was a friend of the working class. He governed like Bush III and appointed a
nasty clique of neocons and Wall street bankers in his administration. Just look at Pompeo. He is
probably as evil as Cheney.
Notable quotes:
"... Biden has been a mediocre politician for 47 years, taking advantage of his office to skim money for his family when he could. At no point in those 47 years has he demonstrated moral or ethical fortitude. ..."
"... But equally as malicious, at no point did Biden ever condemn the acts by other democrats to undermine an elected government with a series of fabricated and fraudulent investigation, or years of calls for violence and harassment of opposition politicians, and even calls for outright assassination. ..."
J. Turley said he didn't think this was a fraudulent election... If you can be so blind, irrational, and brainwashed
as to not see the fraud and illegitimacy of this election, I really can't trust your judgment
on other important matters.
Just Another Vietnam Vet 22 hours ago (Edited)
Bad Decisions : the Joe Biden Story... its all over the net......
100% correct. To try to normalize any of the treachery that has taken place lately or
these past four years is pure evil. To try to tell people at this point just to move on will not work...
deep-state-retired 1 day ago
He wants to stay in the cocktail party circuit. They all do.
Ex-Oligarch 1 day ago
If the elections are fraudulent, betraying their constituents won't end these politicians'
careers. They'll keep right on pulling in "campaign contribution" bribes and playing footsie
with the democrats, secure in the role they play in the system.
CheapBastard 1 day ago (Edited)
Biden also refused to denounce the riots and burning down of over 9 major cities across
the nation. In fact, his Ho, Harris, was bailing out the arsonists and looters.
JohnGault 1 day ago (Edited)
Biden has been a mediocre politician for 47 years, taking advantage of his office to skim money for his family when he
could. At no point in those 47 years has he demonstrated moral or ethical fortitude. Instead, he pandered to whichever
populist forces prevailed to maintain his office.
Biden has recently called for "a return of decency" to Washington, in sharp contrast to
his public statements about the current president saying "if we were in high school, I would
take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him". How incredibly "decent" of Joe, isn't
it?
But equally as malicious, at no point did Biden ever condemn the acts by other democrats
to undermine an elected government with a series of fabricated and fraudulent investigation,
or years of calls for violence and harassment of opposition politicians, and even calls for
outright assassination.
Can you imagine the level of outrage by democrats and the media if a republican called for
the assasination of obama or hillary? The uproar would be deafening.
No, Biden is just a mediocre shill with no moral or ethical compass to guide him. And that
kind of rudderless leadership inevitably ends in disaster.
NoBigDeal 1 day ago remove link
Biden reads the words from the teleprompter that are written for him. I wouldn't expect
much more from him than that.
bsdetector 1 day ago
I saw part of President Elect Biden's speech this week. He denounced President Trump for
everything he believes is wrong in America. His speech was hateful and divisive and was made
at a time when better words would have been helpful for America.
President Trump has many faults but he delivered a message during the last four years that
resonates with many Americans. By attacking President Trump in this speech, Mr. Biden attacks
the Americans that believe in President Trump's message.
It would be better for Mr. Biden to acknowledge that causes for election fraud allegations
will be investigated.
donkey_shot 1 day ago
how can Biden denounce an impeachment when he`s not sure if it`s his own impeachment, or
trump?
Sean7k PREMIUM 1 day ago
...that ship sailed when
numerous courts failed to grant any relief on election fraud. It is the main reason courts
exist. Therefore, the final nail in the coffin has been secured, the US is no longer anything
but a banana republic...
Leguran@premium PREMIUM 1 day ago (Edited)
Edit
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Biden is "America's" choice for president (lower case intended). In my
opinion he has already sold out his country. His base is exclusively the cities where stupid people who go back and forth like
hedonistic living dead believing that their future lies in a FASCIST Globalism...
My choice is to get my stuff out of reach and let these progressive idiots economically
starve.
Snaffew 1 day ago remove link
Biden can't put two words together, let alone two thoughts -- the man is far more criminal
and many levels dumber than Trump and "the people" believe this is the right "choice"...
Jon_noDough 1 day ago
Biden isn't and never was "presidential" material. Just a corrupt career politician mouthpiece for whoever is back there
running the show...
Whodathunkit 6 hours ago
That was a presidential moment missed by the President-elect.
joe ain't too bright.
Engenie 12 hours ago
Biden will do exactly what he is told, when he is told. Thinking he can make his own decisions is laughable.
PGR88 1 day ago
Biden wasn't very smart to start with, and now he's suffering from dementia. He'll say
whatever he's told to say.
gonediving 1 day ago
NOT Important says the Deep State...move along....nothing to see hear NY Times only
reported it once so you would not miss it! Plausible deniability when needed.
"... More telling is the fake outrage by politicians to score political points and justify additional control over the populace. Chuck Schumer compared it to Pearl Harbor, calling it a date "in American history that will live forever in infamy." President-elect Joe Biden characterized it as "one of the darkest days in the history or our nation" and "an unprecedented assault on our democracy." ..."
"... Schumer and Biden conveniently overlook the irony of their statements. They may be accurate. But only for reasons they never intended. Lost in the ruckus was any candid consideration of election counting shenanigans. This is the real assault on democracy that will forever live in infamy. ..."
"... At the same time, the nation's leaders have little clue what's going on. Schumer. Pelosi. McConnell. All the clowns in Congress. They think that with that ogre Trump out of the way, they can let the good times roll again. They know not what they face. ..."
The storming of the U.S. Capitol Building on Wednesday was a wacky and wild escapade. But it
shouldn't be a surprise. These things happen when a nation's in decline. And, as Wednesday
demonstrated, America's recline and flail
goes on .
More telling is the fake outrage by politicians to score political points and justify
additional control over the populace. Chuck Schumer compared it to Pearl Harbor, calling it a
date "in American history that will live forever in infamy." President-elect Joe Biden
characterized it as "one of the darkest days in the history or our nation" and "an
unprecedented assault on our democracy."
Schumer and Biden conveniently overlook the irony of their statements. They may be accurate.
But only for reasons they never intended. Lost in the ruckus was any candid consideration of
election counting shenanigans. This is the real assault on democracy that will forever live in
infamy.
But, again, proper perspective must be maintained. A fraud election should come as no
surprise. These things happen when a nation's in decline. We don't like it. But these are the
facts.
At the same time, the nation's leaders have little clue what's going on. Schumer. Pelosi.
McConnell. All the clowns in Congress. They think that with that ogre Trump out of the way,
they can let the good times roll again. They know not what they face.
So a "high misdemeanor" was a serious crime not meriting the death penalty. The icing on the
cake from this conclusion was that it resolved some other questions that had puzzled scholars
as well. And it explained the structure of the Constitution's Impeachment Clause: the words
"Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" provide one example of a high crime
(treason), one example of a high misdemeanor (bribery), and include generic clauses covering
other crimes in the same two categories.
Observe what is excluded from the grounds for impeachment. Congress may not impeach and
remove for a minor crime. Nor may it do so because an officer is reckless, negligent, or has
obnoxious political opinions. The constitutional penalty for those breaches is, for lesser
officers, removal by the president and, for the president and vice-president, re-election
defeat.
While debate over the meaning of the term continued, the House of Representatives could
reasonably assume that non-criminal behavior could constitute a "high misdemeanor." But that's
no longer true. Now we can say unequivocally that whatever you may think of the president's
speech, it's not a basis for impeachment.
Robert G. Natelson is a leading originalist scholar who served as a law professor for 25
years. He is a senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in
Denver. His research articles on the Constitution's meaning have been cited repeatedly by
justices and parties in the Supreme Court.
4 hours ago remove link
There are many well intended supporters of Trump. Having voted for him in 2016, I understand
some of the reasons. People that attended the events at the Capitol ranged from patriotic,
passionate and peaceful Trump supporters to extremists who showed their hate with their symbols
as well as their actions. YOU ARE ALL BEING LUMPED TOGETHER; to the good people - be careful of
being pulled into the hate by the wolves in sheep's clothing. Flags, signs and symbols of
racist, white supremacist and extremist groups were displayed along with Trump 2020 banners and
American flags at Wednesday's
riot at the US Capitol. They portray messages of tyranny, white supremacy, anarchy, racism,
anti-Semitism and hatred. What haters were there: the Three Percenters flag was displayed, as
was Release The Kraken flag, Kekistans flag, Gadsden flags, altered Confederate flag of hate,
American First flag which sounds nice but are tied to violence, Camp Auschwitz flag - no
explanation of what it glorifies is needed, Nationalist Social club - a Nazi group, and the PB
okey sign - a militant group. ALL these groups were at the Capitol on Jan 6th. It's guilt by
association, do you stand w hate groups in Unity? These hate groups are crafty, they need to
trick good people to be among them to legitimize a show of force and hide like cowards in their
shadow after instigating their hateful acts.
Although there is not yet any talk of legislation [in response to the Capitol Hill riots],
it's certainly true there are whispers of purges and other measures to "protect the
constitution".
That quote did not age well, indeed it was wrong from the moment it went to print. Because,
as it turns out, there has actually been "talk of legislation" for weeks – even months.
Soon-to-be-President Joe Biden promised a new "domestic terrorism bill" back in November,
according to the Wall Street Journal .
That is why you're seeing so much usage of the phrase
"domestic terrorism" in the last couple of days.
It's the meme-phrase. The primary talking point for this whole exercise. It was underlined
in all the memos sent out to all the media outlets.
That's why the Washington Post has got an article dedicated to "lawmakers
and experts" arguing that the Capitol Hill protest was an act of "domestic terrorism". And
so have
Vox . And
Mother Jones .
There was one published
yesterday , in which a "senior FBI official" says "more could have been done" if there had
been a "specific law outlawing" domestic terrorism.
"Domestic Terrorism" is clearly where it's at in early 2021, so we can expect a brand new
law regarding it probably by March, at the latest.
What will "Domestic Terrorism" mean in this law?
The answer to that is pretty much always "whatever they want it to mean."
Certainly, it will include "incitement" and "hate speech", I would expect "denialism" to
make an appearance, and be downright shocked if "spreading misinformation" doesn't get a
mention. Don't be surprised if "questioning elections" or "bringing democracy into disrepute"
is made an outright crime.
It will probably be tied into the Covid "pandemic" in some way, too. After all, what is
discouraging people from taking vaccines if not the very definition of "terrorism", right? It's
possible that even climate change will get a mention as well. They like to slide that into
every issue these days.
Joe Biden has claimed multiple times to be the author of the original
Patriot Act , saying it was based entirely on a bill he proposed in the wake of the
Oklahoma City bombing of 1995.
Well now he has a chance to work on the reboot too, and they are always so much better when
you can get the original creative team back together.
There was no justification for the killing of babbitt. Agent provocateurs' were working
the crowd crying to stoke up violence to create a serious incident. The same as with the
Antifa riots in Portland and Seattle and elsewhere. In this case they were largely
unsuccessful. The crowd was peaceful and non-violent. As a result, the provocateurs and
behind the scenes organizers arranged for the Capitol Hill police to remove barricades and
allow the crows to advance into the Capital where they were allowed (and even lead) into the
Capital building. The paid provocateurs were trying to lead the crowd to violence, but with
very limited success. With their plans for violent rioting and destruction unrealized, they
arranged for the assassination of Babbitt and then ran their story anyway-totally
misrepresenting and exaggerating the false "insurrection" as well as trump's alleged
incitement of violence.
This was a setup. The American people have been played and conned. Most sheeple will not
know any better and will believe and accept the Bolshevik media's account of what
happened.
This is how revolutions are accomplished. Same playbook and modus operandi since the
French Revolution. Bolsheviks have done this countless times over the past couple of
centuries. The CIA has used an identical script in Iran in 1953, countless revolutions in
South and Central America, Color Revolutions in the Middle east and most recently Ukraine.
They have this down to a science. Very difficult to stop or prevent when a compliant media
and crooked politicians have been lined up to support the narrative.
The establishment elites in charge will now use this bogus "insurrection" to press their
white racist privilege narrative, suppress free speech and the internet and go on a expedited
campaign for gun confiscation and repeal of the Second Amendment. The Covid hysteria fraud
will get worse and lockdowns and forced mask wearing will be enhanced.
This will be used against all who dare question and challenge the establishment
narrative-regardless of whether one is a Trump supporter or not. (I am not- I voted for
Kanye) They have now conditioned all sheeple to identify all anti-establishment citizens with
the sheeple's hatred of Trump. Very slick Deep state Psyop. People better be very careful.
The Great Purge appears to have been unleashed.
Mamachief 45 minutes ago
They already have a 20,000 page "domestic terrorism" bill ready.
They won't tell you because that was a confirmed Antifa kill.
Hurts the narrative.
You can't tell me they don't have a ******** of their own video surveillance.
manofthenorth 1 hour ago
Official narrative; "still determining the cause of death"
The story stinks to high heaven, does NOT pass the sniff test.
theendofish 1 hour ago
The story was possibly invented to overshadow the killing of an unarmed Ashli in my
opinion. I have nothing to prove this but it's so convenient that it came out the same day.
Whoever killed Ashli should go to prison since his life was hardly in danger. There were cops
behind her at the time of shooting. They had long rifles and weren't saying anything. They
appeared to be as surprised as anyone else there when she got shot.
TheWalrus22 58 minutes ago
Story I heard was that he died from a blood clot in the brain..
son of sam 42 minutes ago
Trump led his 'base' to the slaughter - in this womans' case, literally. No, he is not
guilty of sending them to that building, organizing a 'riot,' or 'inciting violence' to
intimidate representatives; his speech did none of those things.
His actual 'crime' was to pose as a person possessing values identical to those of his
supporters - to pose as an upholder of 'traditional' values in a world gone mad with gender
fluidity, mass fetal murder, profligate government spending, over-regulation, contempt for
actual workers and enterprise, to pretend to be 'fighting for the little guy' instead of
being himself a minion of financial powers angling for maximum influence over both government
and the lives of its citizens.
A poseur who wasted zero time in changing the yardsticks in favor of those whom he 'owed'
immediately upon arrival - the GOLDMAN ADMINISTRATION was an apt description of his
administrative choices and legislative legacy - the Don was happy to use his gullible base of
supporters as cannon fodder in a phony war against a cabal of which he was both an initiate
and a lackey. Screened from accountability by a troll army the tattered remnants of which
still infect these very pages with a pathetic 'chimera' of their once virulent strain of
gaslighting disinfo and misdirection, the man was successful for four years in giving the
appearance of being a 'victim' of the very choices he himself had made - to surround himself
with dripping wet swamp critters like "Bushey Bandit Barr," the Dershowitz creature, the
other cabinet member infamous for getting Jeffy off the hook in Florida,
while a phalanx of willing dissemblers continued to stretch it out so that 'just wait -
it's coming - the dossiers are about to be released! etc., became the standard fare by which
a large chunk of Americans were slowing starved of hope and belief, but kept hoping and
believing anyhow, because the looming alternative - and this moments actual grisly REALITY -
where simply to terrible to contemplate. The reality tv star played his role to perfection.
There does not need be a 'second season' - the show has run its course, and his supporters
into the ground.
The 1% are now ten times richer than they were when this wretched circus started 4 years
ago, and "the base" is about to get introduced to a kind of grinding poverty - both mental
and physical - which will make images of the dirty thirties look like a Catskills day camp;
tru to his word, the Don has delivered on his slogan - Amerika is about to GRATE again - on
the skewer of a BBQ of souls which the left has openly promised - and now proceeds to
perform, in the HOLOMAR tradition so beloved to haters of humankind.
John Hansen 37 minutes ago
A lot of truth to what you say, but it isn't as if any of them are any better.
Trump was an empty suit but he talked the talk (sometimes), the rest of them can't even
manage that.
UnhingedBecauseLucid 12 minutes ago (Edited)
His actual 'crime' was to pose as a person possessing values identical to those of his
supporters - to pose as an upholder of 'traditional' values in a world gone mad with gender
fluidity, <strike>mass fetal murder</strike>, profligate government spending,
over-regulation, contempt for actual workers and enterprise, to pretend to be 'fighting for
the little guy' instead of being himself a minion of financial powers angling for maximum
influence over both government and the lives of its citizens.
I'd have to upvote you by 1 ... then downvote you by 1.
But for the pinpoint accuracy of the highlight, and since I'm in a good mood today, I'll
upvote you by 0.5 ... which I can't do on this platform, so I'll just right it down in
comment ... ... for the record . ;-)
pndr4495 49 minutes ago
This woman served our country and took an oath to uphold and defend our Constitution, our
law of the land. The TRUTH about this shooting better be laid out in front of the American
Public. Many people on ZH have children serving our country.
When was the last time, if ever, any of the cowering politicians considered upholding
& defending our Constitution?
sijoittaja 1 hour ago
So can I break into the White House and expect the Secret Service to welcome me with open
hands into the oval office?
Here are some relevant laws:
18 U.S. Code § 1361 - Government property or contracts
18 U.S. Code § 2112 - Personal property of United States
18 U.S.C. § 930 - Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal
facilities
18 U.S.C. § 1752 - Restricted building or grounds
18 U.S. Code § 231 - Civil disorders
18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
Ink Pusher 1 hour ago (Edited) remove link
Oh so,cold the blooded murder of an unarmed Patriot Veteran by a poorly trained and
frightened traitor is now conveniently reduced to an excessive force investigation?
A Fed Up Dude 1 hour ago
IF it was a white cop that shot a black BLM,,,,,,,,,OH MAN !!! can you imagine the charges
?????
Nature_Boy_Wooooo 1 hour ago (Edited)
In the time it took him to walk closer to her and line up his point blank shot......
He could have fled or fired a warning shot in the air.....or like Joe Biden says.....he
could have shot her in the hand.
Handful of Dust 1 hour ago (Edited)
The murder was so deliberate ...slow, calculating, careful, and accurate.
What was the guy thinking?
Who paid him to kill?
Nature_Boy_Wooooo 1 hour ago remove link
He attacked her like a woman killing a spider. That was not professional and he should be
removed from duty immediately if not charged with murder.
Pro_sanity 1 hour ago (Edited)
Anybody in antifa or blm shot by police? At any point all ******* summer long as they
burnt businesses to the ground and wiped people out.
But already on day 1 of a protest by the conservatives and a woman was executed.
That oughta tell you all you need to know about things will unfold.
Neo2021 1 hour ago (Edited) remove link
Excessive FORCE?? How about negligent homicide at the least. If you or I did this on the
street we would be in prison for at least 10-15 years. She was an unarmed protester;
trespassing would be the charge at most. I guess BLM and ANTIFA (which was created during WW1
by the fascists by the way) looting burning and injuring people without charges filed was ok.
Fail
novictim 1 hour ago (Edited) remove link
This is the Kent State massacre of our day. An unarmed patriot and veteran, a woman
dedicated to the USA, was using civil disobedience no different from the folks who stormed
the Judge Kavanaugh hearings and was executed for it.
(And the trigger person, very ironically, is a black woman with a badge who is clearly
premeditated in her choice to execute Ashli).
So now that a person has been literally executed for Civil Disobedience , where is the MSM
outrage ? There is none because we no longer live in a free nation. We literally had an
election stolen from us and had no free speech leading up to this steal. Why would they let
the truth out about their complicity with Communist China ever be known when they can stop
it?
Free Speech and Moral Courage are reserved now only for those that the Oligarchy of Tech
Giants and their Uniparty goons on Capital Hill/Chinese Embassy approve.
You will not hear the appropriate chorus of anger if you are listening to the MSM. If you
are still taking your cues from FOX or MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NYTIMES then you must be incapable of
seeing the cage you live in and the bars over your windows, the guards that deny you access
to reality.
"... Mrs. Pelosi's call to Gen. Milley is itself a violation of the separation of powers by seeking to inject herself into an executive-branch military decision. She can offer advice all she wants, but this call at this time has the sound of an order. It might even be construed by some as its own little coup -- conniving with the military to relieve of command the person who remains the elected President. ..."
Mrs. Pelosi's call to Gen. Milley is itself a violation of the separation of powers by
seeking to inject herself into an executive-branch military decision. She can offer advice all
she wants, but this call at this time has the sound of an order. It might even be construed by
some as its own little coup -- conniving with the military to relieve of command the person who
remains the elected President.
What if an adversary leaps on the news and decides this is the moment to stage some military
action when the U.S. is consumed with internal conflict? Does Gen. Milley now have to consult
with the Speaker before he acts in America's defense? How anyone thinks her intervention would
restore good constitutional order to government or some modicum of sanity to politics is a
mystery.
Mr. Trump failed his constitutional test on Wednesday. But Mrs. Pelosi showed awful judgment
with her grandstanding over the nuclear launch codes. Late Friday she announced that she's also
revving up the impeachment machinery. So much for calming political tempers.
@Roacheforque
from the FBI or DOJ) who got into the offices of Pelosi and other Swamp elders.
These people appropriated a whole bunch of laptops that had been carelessly left behind in
the scuffle, which could soon provide quite a window into the doings of America's august
leaders throughout their several recent coup attempts. Imagine Hunter Biden's Laptop from
Hell x 20.
If true, no wonder Pelosi is in full shrieking harpy mode, calling for the immediate
invocation of the 25th Amendment or Impeachment #2.
The probe comes as businesses and governments across the US look to
jettison employees who may have taken part in Wednesday's violent protest in Washington to
fight certification of President-elect Joe Biden's electoral votes. The CEO of suburban
Chicago-based data analytics firm Cogensia was fired on Friday after being arrested over his
alleged role in the riot, as was the associate general counsel of Texas-based Goosehead
Insurance. The latter claimed he was peacefully demonstrating.
A Chicago real estate agent also
lost her job after saying on social media that she took part in "storming the
Capitol." A Saint Vincent College professor was
cut loose by the Pennsylvania school after he shared pictures of himself outside the
Capitol on Wednesday. The president of the Richmond Food Truck Association was forced to resign
for participating in the protest.
And as the Seattle investigation shows, public-sector employers also are cracking down. The
Allentown School District in Pennsylvania has a similar investigation under way of an employee
who may have been involved in the protest.
...The crackdown is raising questions over whether people who took part in the DC protests
peacefully and legally will be lumped in with law-breakers and punished.
Juan_More 1 hour ago 9 Jan, 2021 09:51 PM
I think that firing someone for attending and being captured on video, in pictures or
admitting to being there is over the top. Now if someone had been charged and convicted in a
court of law then that would be another matter. Anyone loosing their job over being "seen"
has been summarily dismissed where the employer has just cause to terminate an employee
without any notice or pay in lieu of notice. Summary dismissal is the death penalty in
employment law. Therefore, summary dismissal is only appropriate where there is serious
misconduct. Is being there just case? IMHO, and under the legal rules, until someone has been
through the legal process they are considered innocent.
RTaccount 1 hour ago 9 Jan, 2021 09:35 PM
And there will be no unity and no peace. Democrats created this situation, they should no
complain about it now.
GaravSG RTaccount 1 hour ago 9 Jan, 2021 10:00 PM
They are in power position and hunting down the Republicans on make believe insurrection. Why
would they complain ? They are enjoying every bit of it. Expect more to come.
1Just_Dessert 3 hours ago 9 Jan, 2021 08:08 PM
"The department fully supports all lawful expressions of First Amendment freedom of
speech'..unless you are against fake democrats and fully support the current president of US
- Mr Trump! US - you really are the worst country in the world.
CA_Sue 2 hours ago 9 Jan, 2021 09:09 PM
Does Chief Diaz understand the difference in meaning of demonstration, protest and the act of
insurrection? Probably not.
Lose their jobs? Wow, unlike the leftist marauders, you mean these people actually had jobs?
So the globalist collaborators are happy to wreck the already tottering economy out of
political spite? Now we see the depth of hate they can mine while claiming to 'fight hate'.
Ally Hauptmann-Gurski 1 hour ago 9 Jan, 2021 09:25 PM
We don't even know what they are really after, or do we? Better conditions within the US
would require less expenses for the military. If they want to restore hegemony they need
money and would have to spend more money on the military which always requires shortchanging
the people.
Jewel Gyn 29 minutes ago 9 Jan, 2021 10:56 PM
Brace yourself America for a rough ride. Dems have total control come 20 Jan. President,
House and Senate. Nothing to stop them from colluding with the big globalist corporations.
Tom_Callan 3 hours ago 9 Jan, 2021 08:02 PM
The USA sounds more like an old communist country everyday! Perhaps they'll even introduce a
re-education camps like China. Afterall, 'China Joe' is going to be running the USA!
Paul Ericson Tom_Callan 1 hour ago 9 Jan, 2021 09:25 PM
Too many 'boomers' I'm afraid sat back and let it happen while they binged on dumb
consumerism. They let their kids be corrupted by the schools and even when the Web made
information so easily available, they just turned-up their TVs and swallowed the propaganda
poured into them by the global media cartels. I have sometimes found more info in the Times
of India than any western outlet.
Demands for Donald Trump backers to seek "redemption" of sorts make Democrats look as
intolerant as the most hardline Islamists, conservative political commentator Candace Owens has
said.
Outspoken conservative Owens took to Twitter on Saturday, hitting out at calls for
"redemption" in the aftermath of the Capitol Hill siege and Trump's social media ban.
She condemned the "brown-shirt approach" exhibited by many Democrats, stating that the
pro-Trump crowd won't just "magically disappear," and comparing their inability to cope
with opposite views to the intolerance displayed by the Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS)
terrorist group.
"Democrats are literally beginning to sound like ISIS. 'Recite the Quran or get your head
chopped off, now!' Absolutely psychopathic. You will not make President Trump and his 75
million voters magically disappear or cower in fear."
Owens' angry message came in response to a tweet from John Brennan, former CIA director and
self-described "nonpartisan American," who mused about what should be done to the
pro-Trump crowd. Merely ceasing to support the president is not enough, Brennan warned,
suggesting that those seeking "redemption" must confess their 'wrong' views.
"Total denunciation of a despot's legacy is necessary to eradicate any remaining
malignancy," he stated.
In fact, Brennan is far from alone in expressing such views, with multiple commentators
urging the need for a religious-sounding "redemption" of sorts or the outright
persecution of Trump-supporters, somewhat resembling denazification in post-WWII Germany. The
calls for such measures have been greatly amplified by the recent Capitol Hill incident, which
left five people including a law enforcement officer dead.
Others accused the pro-Democratic crowd of acting like Nazis, sharing more ideas –
straight from Hitler's Germany – about how they should try and punish the Trump
supporters.
Trump supporters should have to wear an arm badge...that way if they're in a car accident
EMS knows they should leave them to die.
Many hit out at Brennan personally, accusing him of just holding a grudge against Trump, who
booted him from his CIA position back in 2017, and now simply seeking revenge. Moreover, his
spiritual-sounding musings were not quite in-line with his spy career, they argued.
She surely does. It is the Democrats who need to seek redemption,. After applauding to all
kinds of property destruction and looting all summer long by Antifa and BLM, including the
Federal court houses. What else is left there for all of these immorals to do ? Kamala Harris
called riots a movement this summer, and said > 'they should not stop'. youtube.c o
m/watch?v=5XxLR2r5oPg ( enter the link without spaces )
Debra***** Wazzup 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:34 AM
She does. It is getting scarier and scarier.
White Elk 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:28 AM
It can still be considered and discussed what should be done to the pro-Trump crowds, while
it is quite certain that Mr. J. Brennan should be serving his fair term for what he has
committed. Same as many others in the Clinton-Bush-Obama administrations.
Franc White Elk 2 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 10:22 AM
Nothing should "be done to" the pro-Trump crowds. Why don't we just come out and acknowledge
how authoritarian and dystopian it is to impose penalties on groups for their beliefs?
Hilarous 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:25 AM
People need to stop referring to Nazi Germany. If people would care to research the matter,
they would find out that much of it is war propaganda and fake history to suit and excuse the
victors. If any American needs an example of an evil empire or nation with a bloddy history,
you don't need to look abroad.
JJ_Rousseau Hilarous 2 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 10:17 AM
Unfortunately, it is not allowed to research the matter. The Germans were fighting a very
small minority that had complete control of banking and media, and was way over-represented
in government as well as academia. Which small minority in USA today controls banking, the
media, the politicians, courts, and academia?
RTaccount Hilarous 2 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 10:08 AM
The National Socialists were the good guys.
Jewel Gyn 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:25 AM
"Total denunciation of a despot's legacy is necessary to eradicate any remaining malignancy."
That's an extremist view from a sleazy former CIA director.
Grob_Hahn Jewel Gyn 3 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 09:15 AM
Brennan only exposes the sort of people that have been stabbing Trump and Americans in the
back during his entire administration.
Franc Jewel Gyn 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:55 AM
He calls himself non-partisan, and I believe it. There's only one deep state.
1_WhoBenefits 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:03 AM
On side note by the way, an Iraqi politician said: " ....appreciated the role played by top
anti-terror commander Lieutenant General Qassem Soleimani in the fight against the Daesh
terrorist group, saying only Iran supported the Iraqi nation in its difficult times."
David 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:15 AM
Interesting article, I was talking about what going on American Society long time. Every
where Americans believed they were betrayed by Congress and Senate. It was happening last 20
years. Hard working average Americans lost faith on government they realize politicians they
send become corrupted after going to Washington. Does not matter they are conservatives and
liberals, if they do not solve the problem they both will join together. People realize Trump
talking behalf of them some extend it is true not all the time. Polanski done pumping tax
payers money to rich criticizing others. That is what she done giving 1200 dollars to people
giving more money to big companies. I always call Democracy on RUN
Charredcoal 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:40 AM
Oh C'mon, don't pretend you don't know ISIS is American funded and end product?
Franc Charredcoal 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:57 AM
And started under Obama, an establishment crony just like Biden and the Bush fam.
RTaccount1212 2 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 10:24 AM
The war on conservatives will be responded to by action. Civil war will put the democrats in
their place and we will be victorious like Abraham Lincoln. We are prepared and we are ready.
We will not be silenced you will hear the crackling of our return fire.
Karbonerus_99 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:11 AM
Storm the (((Federal Reserve))) and haang everybody there. That's the real "purge."
RTaccount1212 Karbonerus_99 3 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 09:00 AM
I'm also taking out every socialist on the street. We're at war with our enemies and we'll be
victorious because we are men not soi boi socialist seeking handouts from tax payers.
James Bomb 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 06:59 AM
Repent for your 'whiteness' and your vote for Trump.. Give your money to the brown people...
Or you will be cancelled, or beheaded.. Not hard to see where this is heading.
MeNot 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:36 AM
What we are fully aware of is that there was a fraudulent election arranged and orchestrated
by the Democrats. The illegitimate presidency of a corrupted senile old man and his "Heels up
Side Kick" will take over on 1/20/2021 and continue to take away the rights of citizens.
Franc MeNot 3 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 09:16 AM
1 20 2021 is a palindrome. Just noticed that, thanks for writing it out. Illuminati
confirmeded.
T. Agee Kaye 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:34 AM
Younger Democrats have to start seriously wondering whether it is in their long term
interests to keep following the fatwas of the septa- and octogenarian mullahs of the
Democratic party. The tide is turning. When it comes, the geriatric Democrats will be able to
retire, rich. But what about the rest of them? It may be time to cut a deal with the People
while they still can.
Mike Smith 3 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 09:44 AM
Didn't brennon lie on oath? Or was that some other lovely man
ariadnatheo 3 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 09:52 AM
Trump's supporters are "sinners to be saved," says Levitz, which sounds like a jew's
cringeworthy attempt to convince Christians to join his revenge bandwagon by speaking in what
he thinks is their language.
Jack_O_Lantern 2 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 10:18 AM
How far are we from "Are you now, or have you ever been, a supporter of Donald Trump?"
Richland Yabitches" 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:40 AM
Putin wasted ISIS so there you go, follow the Good and you'll live a Long as Prosperous Life,
unlike McCaine the Liberal Terrorist got buried Head First LOLOL"
shadow1369 Richland Yabitches" 3 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 09:12 AM
Iran also helped destroy ISIS.
Jeffrey Perkins 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:51 AM
trump people have been whipped up to a frenzy, mob mentality, a result of a problem..the
politicians who have coveted their money, made laws protecting their rich buddys and
themselves..they are also a result of a problem, dig deeper..the sets of laws set for the
wealthy are different than the laws for the rest of us..not a specific party..ALL OF US ,
that is the root problem..they have been after trump for a long time because trump was never
really one of them..hes a repeat bankrupt guy, who uses legal loop holes to promote his
brand, he should of never been allowed to use twitter, or any public forum to communicate to
the world..he should of went after those policies that keep the banks and corporate entities
in charge of us..but it was all lost in the fog of democrat, republican name calling and
finger pointing, keep everyone confused and chasing results of problems, further eroding our
society. We are at each others throats, and the sad man through his twitter feed is stirring
the pot..lets think of ways to fix the problem..not fight over the results of the problem
RTreaderCaribb 10 minutes ago 10 Jan, 2021 12:47 PM
There went so much wrong in the USA in the last decades that I even dont know where to begin.
Even Trump made some mistakes as it is not possible to just start fresh. Also his approach to
make the USA again a country was too simple as he underestimated his wrong advisers as Bolton
and o many others. Also his his ways of financially crippling others states by sanctions is
not smart, even so for China he did the right thing. He also failed to pardon Assange and
Snowden and gives in when it does not matter to him. He should have been more calm. He made
many enemies trying to do some of the right things. And Owens is right. Absolutely right.
RTaccount1212 3 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 09:17 AM
This is blatant war on conservatives. If the conservatives don't push back, then they will be
silenced and remain obedient sheep.
shadow1369 3 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 09:08 AM
0bomber and co started more genocidal conflicts than any regime in BRA history. No need for
redemption though. The DNC orchrstrated months of Burning, Looting and Murder across the BRA.
No need for redemption though. Trump's supporters tried to resist a coup, a staged a couple
of peacefuol protests. Round them up and k!ll them all!
Richland Yabitches" 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:32 AM
After all ISIS was created by Obama to Destabilise and Murder Syrians, wasn't he Liberal or
Democratic ?"
Embla Richland Yabitches" 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:30 AM
When looking at ISIS representatives in Germany as they were presented in Media they look
like natives. Whis means Obama and Merkel got it "well" together.
mucky 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:43 AM
its persecution. no truth.
Franc 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:54 AM
Hilarious to see the self-professed righteous ones now advocating for holocausts and
re-education camps. Keep going; we're all laughing our guts out at your hypocrisy. "You have
become the very thing you swore to destroy." - Obi-wan Kenobi "Are we the baddies?" - German
SS soldier, WWII
Ibmekon Franc 3 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 09:02 AM
As a kid, I used to laugh at the cowboys and indians movies. When I realised the reality of
deliberate, calculated genocide I lost all respect for the USA. Let us hope that the USA
disintegrates, and Mexico and the native inidans can reclaim their lands.
Insulyn 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:23 AM
"Total denunciation of a despot's legacy is necessary to eradicate any remaining malignancy"
Ex-CIA shill Brennan. Brennan would have first hand knowledge of malignancy before Trump got
rid of him. Sour grapes from a sour sick CIA man.
Embla Insulyn 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:27 AM
The corruption industry was thriving in Norway when Brennan was in CIA. It just seemed as if
Bergen was some extended spot of the deep state; from Obama to Biden and executed by CIA and
with "fullscale" Stoltenberg network of corruption. This does not exclude any other
representatives of norwegian polical parties. Fjell of Arizona?
Mike Taylor 2 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 10:51 AM
Right you will have to say I am sorry I was so wrong and enabled, etc..... Where did I hear
this before? Was it in China? Reeducation camps re coming too? Just like to know. U nity via
censorship, shaming, etc. is hardly a good path, as it only works for limited time.
ctsread 1 hour ago 10 Jan, 2021 11:21 AM
Trump throws everyone under the bus eventually as long as he achieves his objectives. Trump
has thrown his ardent supporters under the bus when they did not do his illegal bidding. Now,
Trump throws his rioters under the bus after achieving his insurrection objective and
claiming that it was not his fault that the riot had occurred. Trump uses people and then
throwing them out. This guy Trump is the worst among the worse.
YankiGoHome 2 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 10:19 AM
Hey Joe, I know I'm white and male but I know how to lie, cheat and steal. Don't you have a
job for me? I'm getting bored here at that televission station. Greetz, John
Tom_Callan 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:39 AM
John O Brennan....sounds like a despot.
JIMI JAMES Tom_Callan 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:50 AM
Yez,but one my favourite legions,very clever best anti communist double agent,eh'he!
Rogue One 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:54 AM
Democrats are literally beginning to sound like ISIS. "Recite the Quran or get your head
chopped off, now!" Absolutely psychopathic. You will not make President Trump and his 75
million voters magically disappear or cower in fear. - Well said.
Enki14 56 minutes ago 10 Jan, 2021 12:01 PM
Redemption for? The rush to conclude that the rioters who entered the Capitol were all Trump
supporters? One General has said those storming the Capitol were also Antifa, who may have
been the first one's through, the guards opened the way and one guard is guilty of murdering
an unarmed woman. The photos are available via security cameras and if the deep state
publishes these then we will find out the truth....no rush to judgment or redemption for
me....
Sebspace Enki14 48 minutes ago 10 Jan, 2021 12:09 PM
An armed mob chanting violent slogans was trying to break into the senate chamber and a woman
got shot. Don't misrepresent what happened as if some innocent bystander was shot in cold
blood. Did you even watch the videos?
sukmiwangyak 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:41 AM
Just think how many eyes rolled over to focus on what is the obvious hostile take over by
Foreign election interference and mountains of evidence of voter fraud. The Deep state is the
Media, Big-Tech, and rules over the house of Congress as well as the Senate. Don't fall for
the Left & Right parties they both was involved in 911 and like today they both blocked
forensic investigation as they roll back the constitution more and more. Think about it...
Did the ISIS tell Biden to openly confess putting together the biggest voter fraud in history
before the election or was it Russia, China, or the Supreme Court that refused to accept
video, Forensic, & eye witness evidence to be placed on record. ISIS, Antifa, BLM is
controlled by the same handlers at the top of the pyramid of deceptions. The real enemy of
United States is sitting in office ripping up the Bill of Rights. All this, is just
Controlling the how many are being depopulate around the word as more vaccinations are
released into the public. Think about this........ all these Giant Corporations where
intelligence company's that they run to fund their illegal war on humanity to fulfill their
handlers wishes, they came out of nowhere's, and just declared the Authority over life,
Justice, and Freedom for all. This is just part of the planndemic scheme to advance their end
game. When is the world going to wake up and realize the Cabal has declared war on all of us.
daggo77 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:09 AM
Pretty sure The US will send them to re-education camps.
Insulyn daggo77 5 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 07:27 AM
The weight of the state is a heavy hand already, now it is getting worse. Time to choose and
act.
Skeptic076 1 hour ago 10 Jan, 2021 11:45 AM
Yeah, redemption like happened on the 6th with them tucking tail and running only to be
apprehended with in a day or two. Really smart folks. Go for it. Trump supporters are
cleaning up themselves, lol.
JIMI JAMES 4 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 08:10 AM
Democrats are the ones who need redemption,only sin unforgivens of they unrepenteds, Indeed
the greates genociders in history post ww2 on all accounts(period) via intimidation,false
flags,bomb vietnam based on fake human living rights ethics right? Get Thee Behind Me
Satan,Jesus Is Lord:
emnc 2 hours ago 10 Jan, 2021 10:34 AM
Many of the CIA directors should have the same mindset of Mr. Brennan, that should be the
reason behind all the missery the CIA have caused to a lot of people in the entire world.
"... It has become a hopeless task to try to restore American deterrence and prestige. Rival powers will see new vulnerability in the US. Even the US' firmest allies in Europe are wondering why they should place trust in the trans-Atlantic alliance with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization at its center when American politics has become so febrile.... ..."
"... The fault lines have become too deep to be papered over and there is growing likelihood that [both] the Republican and Democratic parties might split in a conceivable future, ending the [Duopolistic] system itself. ..."
At Asia Times , MK Bhadrakumar has a new article, "The Day American Democracy
Died," a hyperbolistic title since such a thing as American Democracy never existed.
However, Bhadrakumar does raise a few points:
"Without doubt, the US has been fundamentally weakened on the international stage.
"It has become a hopeless task to try to restore American deterrence and prestige. Rival
powers will see new vulnerability in the US. Even the US' firmest allies in Europe are
wondering why they should place trust in the trans-Atlantic alliance with the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization at its center when American politics has become so febrile....
..."The fault lines have become too deep to be papered over and there is growing
likelihood that [both] the Republican and Democratic parties might split in a conceivable
future, ending the [Duopolistic] system itself. The US has become that dreaded divided
republic that George Washington and his successor John Adams warned about....
"The answer lies in multiparty democracy. But there is a vicious cycle, what with the
elections clause of the constitution, which leaves states to decide their own rules, and
reserves to Congress the power to intervene, a power that Congress has used over the years to
keep the two-party system in place and ensure that elections largely remain
uncompetitive.
"How could there be modern mass democracy without political parties? [There is; look at
China!!] Most advanced democracies have moved to proportional representation, supporting
multiparty democracies, whereas the US electoral system and voting rules that were imported
from Britain without debate in the 19th century remain frozen in time."
Again, much is overlooked and Biden is too highly regarded by the writer. The nature of
the Outlaw US Empire's political-economy and those running it are completely ignored. I've
yet to read a proper holistic report on the reality within the Empire. And there's no
questioning as to how with its dire economic issues the Outlaw US Empire can continue to
support its Empire of Bases and numerous occupations that no longer have any rational
purpose.
Even as they rush headlong to ban non-approved speech and prosecute thought crimes, and to
attempt to impeach Donald Trump in order to prevent him from running for President again, his
approval rating has held steady according to Rasmussen. And their failure to recognize just how
weak they are means they are walking into a trap, provided we keep our heads. After all, all
they really have is the media's shock and awe. It is the working and middle classes who keep
this tattered economy up and running and over 75 million of them voted for Donald Trump, don't
believe that Joe Biden is a legitimate president, know that the events at the Capitol on
January 6 were a setup, and are not going anywhere.
As Silicon Valley moved Friday to ban the President permanently from all current social
media platforms, and de-platformed Parler, the conservative free speech alternative to Twitter,
the dumb ass Avatar illegitimate President elect spit out his teleprompter script, declaring
Trump supporters, en masse, to be "domestic terrorists," compared Senators Ted Cruz and Josh
Hawley to Joseph Goebbels, and said the Capitol police were racist in their response to the
events at the Capitol on January 6. The addled Avatar seemed to have momentarily forgotten his
message of condolences to the family of Officer Brian Sicknick, who died defending the
Congress.
This is all designed to scare you or provoke you into violence based on your fears. Since
the sole uniting principle of the fascist Democrats is hatred of Donald Trump, and the RINO
Republicans are joined at the hip to the same Wall Street/City of London failing financial
enterprise, they are compelled to keep it up lest they fall entirely apart, an event which is
coming very soon.
That said, here are some urgent pointers and perspectives in the immediate term, the
interim, before that happens:
(1). Continue to demand (not plead) that your Congressmen and Senators keep their, "Hands
Off Donald Trump." You are not coming to them as an underling, a supplicant. You hold the power
here and they are afraid of you. Calmly and serenely tell them that any action against Trump is
absolutely unacceptable, they need to get a grip on reality, they need to act for the actual
future of the country while the other side seeks to provoke a Civil War, like the one the
British Empire worked in their last attempt to cancel the United States.
(2). Understand that anyone urging violence including violence at the inauguration is either
a controlled asset of the intelligence community or a fool who will discredit the political
movement to take the country back. Coming to Washington to "protest' the inauguration of the
Avatar will be, at this point, walking into a complete prepared trap. The President ain't
giving him the honor of his presence, why should you? Have you figured out yet that Q is an
intelligence agency psyop based in the type of magical thinking that will get you killed and
lose the nation? If not, you really aren't qualified to participate in what is currently
hitting us. The enemy has your number.
rump sincerely thought that he could irreversibly effect significant long-term change to the
way that America is run by "draining the swamp" that all of his supporters so deeply despise,
but he ultimately lacked the strength time and again to take the decisive steps that were
necessary in order to execute this grand strategic vision due to several important reasons that
deserve to be discussed at length.
THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF CAPITULATES
The Trump Era is over after the incumbent announced in the day after
Wednesday's storming of the US Capitol that "My focus now turns to ensuring a smooth, orderly
and seamless transition of power", which was widely interpreted by friends and foes alike as
the tacit concession that he previously promised never to provide a little more than 24 hours
prior during his speech at the
Save America Rally .
At that event, he literally said that "We will never give up. We will never concede, it
doesn't happen. You don't concede when there's theft involved", yet completely changed his
tune following the day's tumultuous events and after mysteriously "going dark" for over 24
hours, during which time some speculate that he was forced by his enemies in the permanent
military, intelligence, and diplomatic bureaucracies (" deep state ") to give
up the fight.
BETRAYING HIS BASE
This totally devastated his supporters who elected him primarily
for the purpose of executing his chief promise to "drain the swamp" that all of them so
deeply despise. They truly believed that he could irreversibly effect significant long-term
change to the way that America is run, something which Trump himself also sincerely thought he
could do as well, but he ultimately lacked the strength time and again to take the decisive
steps that were necessary in order to do so.
Thus, he ended up getting swallowed by the same "swamp" that he attempted to drain, which is
licking its lips after feasting on the political carcass that he's since become as a result of
his capitulation. For as much hope as he inspired in his supporters and the respect that many
of them still have for him, most of them are profoundly disappointed that he gave up and didn't
go down fighting.
That's not to say that the vast majority of them expected him to forcefully resist Biden's
impending inauguration, but just that they never thought they'd see the day where he publicly
capitulated after carefully cultivating such a convincing reputation among them as a fighter
who literally said a little more than 24 hours prior that "We will never give up. We will
never concede, it just doesn't happen."
This prompted an ongoing soul-searching process among the most sober-minded of them who
aren't indoctrinated with the cultish Q-Anon claims that Trump still has a so-called "master
plan" that he's preparing to implement after this latest "5D chess" move. It's over, the Trump
Era has ended, and the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement that he inspired is now at
risk of being declared a "
domestic terrorist " organization in the coming future.
TRUMP'S MOST FATAL POLITICAL
MISCALCULATION
" Biden's America Would Be A
Dystopian Hellhole ", like the author predicted a few months ago, and all of Trump's
supporters know that. Some had already resigned themselves to its seeming inevitability after
his efforts to legally reverse the contested results of the latest elections failed for a
variety of reasons that most of them attribute to the "swamp's" corruption, but they
nevertheless remained as positive as possible after having believed that their hero would go
down with them to the end.
None ever thought twice about his promise to "never give up, never concede", and they even
expected him to have to be escorted from the White House on 20 January, yet his tacit
concession is forcing many of them to re-evaluate their views about him in hindsight. Not only
is he going out with a whimper on the "deep state's" terms, but he never fully "drained the
swamp".
Trump's most fatal political miscalculation is that he thought that he could change the
system from the "inside-out" after symbolically -- yet importantly, not substantively -- taking
control of it as America's first modern-day "outsider" President. He immediately switched from
an "outsider" to an "insider" shortly after his inauguration by capitulating to the "deep
state's" demands that he fire former National Security Advisor Flynn, which was his "original
sin" that paved the way for all that would later follow.
Trump the self-professed "deal-maker" thought that he could strike a "compromise" with his
enemies through these means, but all that he did was embolden them to intensify their fake
news-driven efforts to oust him and continue sabotaging him from within through many of the
same "swamp" creatures that he naively continued to surround himself with.
RINOS + MSM =
TRUMP'S DEFEAT
The most reviled among them in the eyes of his base is "Javanka", the popular portmanteau of
Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and his daughter Ivanka. He continued listening to these
"Republicans In Name Only", or RINOs as many MAGA members describe them, as well as many others
such as those who still sit in Congress but pretended to be his friend just to win
re-election.
Furthermore, the influence that his former reality TV career had on him resulted in Trump
remaining obsessed with how his enemies might malign him in the Mainstream Media (MSM) for any
decisive moves that he took to smash the "deep state". This weakness of character proved to be
his greatest personal flaw since he should have followed his instincts instead of submitting to
the egoistic desire to be "liked" by his foes.
So influenced was he by the MSM that his enemies were able to employ the most basic
"reverse-psychology" tricks to manipulate him into "playing it safe" in his struggle against
the "deep state". They fearmongered since even before he entered office that he'd turn into a
so-called "dictator", yet he never seriously contemplated any such authoritarian moves in that
direction despite always having the possibility of utilizing the immense powers vested in him
by the Constitution to do so if he sincerely wanted.
His MAGA supporters passionately pleaded that he should have turned into his enemies' worst
nightmare by declaring at least limited martial law in response to the decades-long Hybrid War
of Terror on America finally going kinetic last summer after Antifa and "Black Lives
Matter" (BLM) orchestrated nationwide riots to oust him.
TRUMP'S THREE GREATEST
FAILURES
Bewildering his base, Trump also failed to revoke Article 230 despite now-proven fears that
it would empower Big Tech to censor him and
his supporters , nor did he thwart the Democrats' mail-in ballot and Dominion voting system
schemes which they argue ultimately led to them stealing the election.
Just as concerning was his decision to not stop the Democrat Governors from locking down
their populations for political reasons under the convenient pretext of COVID-19. The author
addressed all of these issues in his analysis published shortly after the election about why "
The Anti-Trump Regime
Change Sequence Is Worthwhile Studying ". Trump could have legally exercised
near-"dictatorial" powers to avert all of this and thus save America as his supporters see it,
yet time and again he failed to gather the strength needed to do so due to his deep personal
flaws.
THE HYBRID WAR ON AMERICA IS OVER
While Trump was unquestionably victimized by the "deep state" during his entire time in
office, he's no longer as much of a martyr as he used to be after suddenly giving up the fight
following Wednesday's storming of the US Capitol. He surrendered to the shock of his base, was
subsequently swallowed by the "swamp", and is now being mercilessly destroyed in an ominous
sign of what awaits the rest of the MAGA movement in the Biden-Kamala era.
Had he gone down fighting to the end and "never gave up" like he promised, then it would be
an altogether different story, but instead his over-hyped "deal-making" instincts got the best
of him at the very last minute and he foolishly thought that he could save himself by
capitulating to their demands. The "deep state" is now showing their "thanks" by censoring him
from social media and pushing for his impeachment.
The MAGA movement always believed that the country has already been at "war" for years even
though most couldn't articulate the hybrid nature of it like the author did in his piece last
summer about how " The Hybrid War Of Terror
On America Was Decades In The Making ".
They truly felt that Trump shared their threat assessment after he was viciously attacked by
the "deep state" from the second that he stepped onto the campaign trail, but it turned out
that he underestimated the threat even though his enemies never did. To the "deep state" and
their public Democrat proxies, this was always a "war" in its own way, which they never shied
away from expressing.
The supreme irony is that while Trump lambasted the "weak Republicans" in his Save America
Rally speech, he himself ultimately epitomized that very same weakness by later
surrendering.
THE "DEEP STATE" WON
His opponents know no limits and believe in classic Machiavellian fashion that "the ends
justify the means", whereas he thought that he could play by the rules -- and not even all of
them as was early explained by pointing out his refusal to employ the near-"dictatorial" powers
vested in him by the Constitution -- and still come out on top.
His naïveté will go down in history since it's what's most directly responsible
for him failing to fully recognize the seriousness of the "deep state's" no-holds-barred war on
him and the rest of America.
As a born-and-raised New Yorker, Trump perfected the art of slick talking, so much so that
he even managed to dupe his base into believing that he shared their threat assessment about
the decades-long Hybrid War of Terror on America. They fell for this charade since they
desperately wanted to believe that there was still some hope left.
There isn't, though, since the war is over and the "deep state" won once and for all. The "
Great Reset "/"
Fourth Industrial Revolution " brought about by
World War C is
barreling forward at full speed ahead, and practically every domestic accomplishment that Trump
has to his name will likely be reversed by Biden-Kamala during their first year in office,
especially since the "deep state's" Democrat proxies control all branches of government now
(remembering that the Supreme Court's supposed "conservative supermajority" really just
consists of RINOs as was proven by their refusal to hear his team's convincing election fraud
cases).
In fact, the only real "master plan" was that of the "deep state", which effectively
thwarted every one of Trump's moves and ultimately turned his supporters' "last hurrah" of a
mostly peaceful rally into the nail that'll now be hammered into the MAGA movement's
coffin.
It's extremely suspicious that the US Capitol was so poorly defended despite there being an
ongoing session of Congress on such an historic day and after weeks of preparation to ensure
the site's safety ahead of Trump's long-planned Save America March.
It's even more baffling that some of the police officers removed
the barricades and even
opened the doors to some of the protesters, which in hindsight suggests that the "deep
state" wanted to tempt the most "overly passionate" among them (to say nothing of suspected
provocateurs) into storming the site as the pretext for what followed.
The whole point in passively facilitating this scenario through the masterful exploitation
of crowd psychology was to lay the basis for a comprehensive nationwide crackdown against the
MAGA movement on the grounds that it's now "proven" to be a "domestic terrorist" group.
That explains the push behind impeaching Trump less than two weeks before he himself
acknowledged just the other day that he'll be leaving office after ensuring the "transition of
power".
Had he not surrendered, then he probably would still be a martyr to most of the MAGA
movement, but now he's just a palace hostage awaiting his highly publicized political execution
as the opening salvo of the "deep state's" Democrat-driven reprisals against his supporters in
the name of "defending against domestic terrorism". That, not whatever Q-Anon imagines, is the
real "master plan", and it succeeded.
CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
Trump was swallowed by the "swamp" because he lacked the strength to drain it. Every MAGA
member needs to accept this harsh truth no matter how painful it might be. Time and again, he
failed to muster up the strength needed to meaningfully fulfill what many sincerely believed to
be his destiny.
This was due to his fatal political miscalculation of transforming from an "outsider" into
an "insider" in a doomed-to-fail attempt to change the system from within. He continued relying
on RINOs despite their proven unreliability. Trump's obsession with how his foes portrayed him
in the MSM also led to him never seriously countenancing the use of the near-"dictatorial"
powers vested in him by the Constitution to save America.
He pathetically surrendered after the "deep state's" "master plan" succeeded, and now he
can't even go down in history as a martyr.
The 6 January protest march clearly shows that the majority of Trump voters had already
given up on Trump so did not join the protest. There was originally talk of a possible one
million people attending, it didn't get anywhere close. If half the nation was still behind
Trump, this was a very puzzling showing.
Trump just did not have what it takes, or was not really trying, to ruthlessly cut out the
cancer of corruption in government. History will show that he was a weak leader who allowed
the deep state to distract him to the extent that he never did anything of note other than to
reveal, through no action of his own, how extreme is the corruption that he had promised to
drain.
The Democrat distractions, paid for by their oligarch owners, showed the world that
extreme corruption is running the USA. Even the most loyal Democrats must be puzzled by the
current purges and threats of extreme centralised thought control, the arrogance of the swamp
now that it has gotten rid of the peoples' man.
To his credit, I am still willing to believe that Trump tried to do the right thing.
Although the author is trying to place Trump as a coward who resigned, going back on his
word, I think this is not how his original supporters see him. From what I can see, the
majority of his original supporters still support him and see him as a figurehead, but they
recognise that he doesn't have the skills to do the job. He is not a coward, he did not cave
in, he recognised, probably because of the low protest numbers, that he did not have what is
takes to continue the fight, he could see that his base had already given up on him. He is
still a figurehead in the patriot movement. He may have lost the far right, but he still has
a lot of centre-ground supporters.
Jacques , Jan 10, 2021 8:49 PM
I don't know what Trump's intentions were, and I couldn't care less.
From where I'm standing, it appears that he was elected on a wave of populism, which
seemed to be an alternative to the "liberal democracy" fakery, the swamp. An interesting
presentation of that was here ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qA50BE7d1X8
). IMHO, Bannon kicked Frum's butt in that debate.
It would appear that populism was a big enough threat for the "swamp" to unleash four
years of a hate campaign against Trump, possibly, probably culminating with COVID. Hard to
believe that it was a coincidence.
Be it as it may, and allowing for the possibility that this or that or the other thing has
been staged this way or that way, Trump's presidency has certainly set things in motion,
woken up people. Had somebody more slick been elected, the transition to the dystopia that
seems to be in the pipeline would probably have been less noticeable, perhaps not noticeable
at all. With the shitshow that has been going down since last February, all of a sudden there
is a public debate. Perhaps misinformed, perhaps mislead, but there is a debate nevertheless.
Will it result in something positive? Hard to say, hopefully.
Bottom line, Trump's presidency has been historically a good thing.
Dayne , Jan 10, 2021 8:40 PM
Peasants in 19th-century Russia clung to a notion of the Czar as a benevolent, fatherly
figure. Even when he rained misery and oppression down on them, it was only because he was
"misinformed", "surrounded by bad guys", etc.
It makes sense: Those were desperate, illiterate people living in misery. Hoping against
hope was all they had. But why would anyone in 2021 think of Trump in essentially the same
way is beyond me. An entrenched military-industrial-media-psychiatric-intelligence system,
hundreds of years in the making and with untold trillions in funding, just stood by as a
Robin-Hood-type hero and people's champion rose to take the Oval Office? Sorry. Trump might
as well sprout wings and fly.
Sgt Oddball , Jan 10, 2021 10:10 PM Reply to
Dayne
Thanx for your comment, Dayne – I've been trying to put this into words, and as I'm
autistic, I could frankly, literally *Sperg'-out* over this, right now
- TL:DR version is this, tho': – Ever wonder why 'Populism' is such a dirty word for
the establishment and their MSM bullhorn? – The argument I've heard thus far generally
goes like the South Park underpants gnome's plan for world domination: – Phase 1:
Popular Uprising (aka: 'Civil Unrest') Phase 2: ? . Phase 3: Fascist 'Strongman' Dictatorship
– Why is that?
- Also that we're *Too Stoopid*(/ie: Self-Absorbed) – Like the Mud-Pickin' peasants
in Monty Python' Holy Grail
- I would suggest 2 reasons for this:
- 1.) The Davostanis (Global Banksters/Oligarchs) never *merely* back the *winning horse*
in the race, – In fact they back *every* horse that they *allow* to run (ergo: Trump
was an Establishment-groomed *Stalking Horse* )
- 2.) The Davostanis (again), have *long since* seen to it that *most everyone*, from
birth onwards, is psychologically conditioned, first with childhood myths and fairy-tales
about Charming Princes and Fair Princesses, then with religio-spiritual 'adult' myths and
fairy-tales about (In Judeo-Christian terms) Messianic, White-Knight champion/rescuer types
who, if *we would only* put our lives and our *Utmost Faith* in their holy, heaven-sent
hands, would *Save Us All* from all the terrible, terrible *Mess We've All Made* for
ourselves down here on Earth, by collectively *Shitting The Bed*
*Obviously*, this is *All* just so much *Childish Nonsense*, and, more to the point, a
*Writ-Large Con-Job*
- Cutting to the chase: – The 'Great-Man' theory of history is *Bunk* – Always
*Has Been*, always *Will Be*
If you're still "Holding Out For A Hero", I invite you to stare *Long And Hard* into the
nearest available mirror, *Take A DEEP Breath*, and then go out and *Elect Yourself* to the
office – *Better Yet*, elect your family, elect your friends, elect your neighbors,
elect *Everyone*
- And then let's *Do This Shit* – *Together*!
James Meeks , Jan 10, 2021 10:23 PM Reply to
Dayne
It could have something to do with the fact that Biden is backed by every billionaire
member of the Davos gang of criminals getting ready to use this event, coupled with medical
martial law, to stage the "great reset" scheme. A wet dream of Malthusian eugenecists like
Faucci & Gates, since it includes a drastic reduction in world population aka genocide of
the elderly, vulnerable, poor and non compliant. This Globalist Technocracy will be led by
un-elected bankers and corporate CEO's effectively ending any form of Democracy planet wide.
MSM mockingbirds are completing the programming of the public to make Casey's statement to
Reagan ring true" We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the
American public believes is wrong."
Mike , Jan 10, 2021 8:15 PM
Trump was never going to be Ameica's hero. He was played to depict America as a fascist,
racist, neo-nazi country that needs to be saved by the [neoliberal] Left aka Joe Biden/Kamala
Harris. The Left can now "save us all" from the "damage" caused by the MAGA movement and
Trump. They can do this through heavily increased mass surveillance and what is essentially
imprisonment, to make sure that we don't fall victim to the "domestic terrorism" that is
represented by Trump and his fan base.
YouTube_censors_unfortuna , Jan 10, 2021 7:40 PM
Trump's racist fan base supported America's bogus War of Terrorism against blameless
Muslim countries, did they not? What goes around, comes around.
I think you are getting fan bases mixed up. Trump inherited these conflicts from Bush,
Iraq 2002 invasion & Obama's 2015 invasion of Syria and it was Trump that threatened to
end the propping up of the endless war industry. In fact that played the major role in why
Trump had to be removed at all costs including selling treason and vote rigging as Democracy
to be defended against "domestic terrorists".
Geoffrey Skoll , Jan 10, 2021 7:25 PM
Right! The Donald was too weak and too stupid. A smarter president got shot for his
troubles, but the rulers knew they didn't have to resort to that against the Donald. He was
obsessed with his mirror. All those meeting between Ike and JFK, what do you think they were
talking about?
MANUEL , Jan 10, 2021 6:55 PM
Do u relly guys think Trump was a hope for all pf us? I am still amazed that
people(including off-guard) still thinks in terms of left vs right, good vs bad, and all that
narrative. I am afraid that nnarrativ has never been true. It is part of the game of "the
matrix" to keep us entertained in shows programmed for tth masses, division, polarizaiomn,
saviours and "heros". In my opinion it is time for a deep shift. Continuing to hope that some
guy will save us all, it is just seeing a tree but not being able to see the woods. While
some keep waiting for somebody to save us, they are moving forward with their plans really
fast. But no problem guys. Sooner or later the rrality will knock on you door, and you will
have to decide if you are going to be a slave or a free human. And it will be all about what
you decide. No american hero or any messiah will do it for you.
Sophie - Admin1 , Jan 10, 2021 9:50 PM Reply to
MANUEL
We have warned against accepting the Left/Right paradigm many times. This is NOT an
editorial and therefore is not 'the voice of OffG'.
Some visitors here need to up their sophistication level to the point they understand we
publish a SPECTRUM of dissident opinion that we consider merits discussion or a wider
audience, without necessarily agreeing with all of it.
"Some visitors here need to up their sophistication level to the point they understand
we publish a SPECTRUM of dissident opinion "
- Yep, well that's as may be, but Andrew Korybko's position is *Lame As All Hell* –
Every establishment talking point *Covered* – just from the 'Contrarian' side
- Trump was an 'Outsider' who 'Became' an 'Insider'?! – Aww Puh-lease! – He
was a *Stalking Horse
- "He didn't have the *'Strength'* to 'Drain The Swamp'(tm)"??!?! – *No-One*
*Indivudal* in all Creation could've
- Do you think we're *Children*?!
Cesca , Jan 10, 2021 5:25 PM
Well written article but i just can't agree with its basic premise. Ok, the Scum killed
JFK but they politically canceled/neutered Trump from day 1. Like him or not, what happened
to him thruout 4 years of office was unprecedented, he was attacked constantly by the Scum
puppets in the Capitol and MSM, this extended worldwide too.
He's human, don't think he gave in cos of the betrayal by Pence or the coup hoax, think it
was cos he knew the Scum won. The coup hoax meant his only chance of presenting the facts
about the Electoral Fraud on a public stage, had disappeared. Pretty sure that was the straw
which broke the camel's back, all levels of the Courts refused to even look at the massive
evidence given to them, just threw the cases out on vague technicalities.
He ain't a person i can personally admire, wld prefer him to have another 4 years than a
glove puppet of the Scum who will be installed tho.
Dafis , Jan 10, 2021 5:07 PM
Just consider – Trump is/was part of the swamp community, just a different segment
from that occupied by Clintons and other long term manipulators. To see Trump in terms of
radical revolutionary change agent is delusional. Personally I suspect that there are hidden
links to a sector of organised crime, people who live by moving money about whether that
money is clean or dirty. Another bunch of manipulators.
"Valid point. Orange Hair Bozo was bribing those corrupt REPUBLICRAT political hack creeps
for quite some time before he decided to go direct and eliminate the
middle man and set up shop himself. Yes, that must have irked some of the corrupt
greedy bastards."
Jan. 6 will provide the pretext for a wide ranging, protracted crackdown, persecution of
all opposition, comprehensive, rigid censorship, blanket surveillance, extensive repressive
new legislation, shredding of civil liberties, and the imposition of one uniform viewpoint.
In short, 1984 on steroids, or Germany in 1933.
Jan. 6 was obviously a staged and planned non organic event.
The complete absence of Antifa (except as provocateurs) proves the point adequately. Although
a mass demonstration was publicised well in advance, only a skeleton crew of Capitol Police
were present.
And this is the Toytown Police. It's not a real police force. It's a cushy job for people who
don't want to have to do much. Normally all they do is check people are wearing their right
badges. Occasionally they may have to eject Medea Benjamin and Code Pink from a hearing.
Something strange happened at the Pentagon a few weeks ago. Esper was kicked out and
several rabid Zionist warmongers were moved in. At the time, this was thought to signal a
last minute attack on Iran by Trump. Requests for 200 troops on Jan. 6 were flatly turned
down.
It is a significant watershed moment.
People finally realise Trump is a fraud.
Elites were terrified by the sight of peasants with pitchforks.
This is likely to lead to further radicalisation.
There was an immediate howl of outrage. "Evil white domestic terrorists."
Cue an immediate Censorship/ Doxing/ Firing spree, ready to go, orchestrated by the Anti
defamation league, Big Tech, FBI, and their Antifa catspaw.
About 70 people had been charged as of 24 hours ago.
Richard Barnett has been arrested for putting his feet up on Pelosi's desk. Like the others,
he faces years in prison.
The charges carry 10 and 20 year sentences. A wave of repression on the scale of Germany in
1933 has to be expected. Ironically, the death of Ashli Babbitt will probably be used to
justify longer sentences, as will the inevitable customary planted "pipe bombs."
This is the chutzpah from the Sanhedrin Power Structure to which we have become
accustomed.
People like Graham and Pelosi have demanded that all the Capitol demonstrators be tracked
down and thrown into dungeons, no matter how long it takes. Though to Pelosi, the petrol
bombers who attacked the Hong Kong Parliament were "a beautiful sight."
We already see a wave of censorship. Trump and many of his supporters have already been
banned from the MSM and the Internet.
Parler has been completely removed by Apple/ Google/ Amazon.
More will follow.
Trumpism is dead. Where will he go? Where will 70 million disenfranchised Americans
go?
Those cheering on the Cancel Culture would do well to remember the old warning, "They're
coming for you next."
All ideological deviations and impurities will be rooted out and punished.
The revolution always devours its own. Like the radical feminists who are insufficiently
enthusiastic on the transgender issue.
Most people realise that Capitol Hill represents a dirty, disgusting, corrupt system that
is incapable of reform.
And crackdowns generally have a bad outcome.
They lead to further radicalisation. The censorship and repression that is being implemented
is unprecedented and will be rejected by a vast swathe of the population.
A potent stew remains.
The baby can't be rocked back to sleep.
Will Trump be impeached again/ removed from office? It seems a bit pointless, with 9 days
left before Creepy Joe takes over. But they might try it, to ban him from holding office in
the future.
Most Republican RINOs hate Trump more than the democrats, and they are spineless jellyfish
who are easily intimidated. These people are incorrigibly vindictive and spiteful by nature,
and this isnt going to change. Jail everybody, fire everybody, dox everybody,
Kathy Smith , Jan 10, 2021 3:24 PM
It wasn't failure to muster up strength, he was playing the role he's been groomed for
over the past couple decades. He is a traitor just like obomber before him and biden will be
after him.
James Sinclair , Jan 10, 2021 5:55 PM Reply to
Chris
I could not agree more. Trump's biggest advantage is perhaps also his major weakness. As
he lacks political experience (not being part of the swamp) he brings both a freshness and
momentum into play. Nevertheless, his inexperience meant that his awareness, "marking" and
ultimately failure to dispose of key adversaries could have fatally undermined his otherwise
wondrous first term as President of the USA and leader of the free world. I now understand
and hope that the "Italy gate" affair will shortly end the prospective Biden inauguration (in
essence an Obama 3rd term). Lessons now learned, the real man of the people, will really be
able to eliminate the dangerous threat from China, "drain the swamp" and eliminate the
mistakes (most especially dealing with the media and Big Tech) that Monsieur Korbyko has
outlined above, on Uncle Tony's behalf x
mr spam , Jan 10, 2021 2:05 PM
Some issues don't seem to have been considered adequately.
What are the implications of what happened?
How are they going to be (mis)represented?
What kind of a Crackdown should we expect to see now?
What will that lead to in turn?
What happens when 70 million plus realise they have been conned, Trump is a fraud and there
is no place for them in the Punch And Judy Show/ Kabuki Theatre provided by the Jewish Power
Structure as a harmless diversion?
What happens to Trump now? Where does he go?
Trump may do what favours he can for his wire pullers in his remaining time. He could
pardon Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein. He certainly isn't going to pardon any of the
supporters he has just thrown under the bus, who now face years and decades in jail.
"The Sacred/ Hallowed Temple Of Freedom has been defiled."
Cue multiple Jerk Off signs.
This place was never more than a Whore House of the most disgusting and corrupt individuals
on earth.
The video of the unarmed woman being shot, apparently for doing no more than climbing
through an open window, has already been taken down. Strange how all the Hollywood Luvvies
and Liberals have gone from ACAB/ defund the police to "We Love Our Police." No condolences
being sent by Mike Pence to the family of Ashli Babbitt, unlike career criminals George Floyd
and Breanna Taylor. Instead we have the harassing of her family by the despicable, disgusting
MSM. Ordinary, salt of the earth people may realise that the police are not their friends,
just tools of a criminal elite. These are the people who were kneeling in submission to
Antifa and BLM, after all. Nobody is going to go around demanding people say Ashli's
name.
Whatever the wisdom of the events of 6 January, those who took part should be seen as
heroes. They put the fear of God into a vile, evil criminal elite, just by going into the
Belly of The Beast, staying within the velvet rope barriers.
Legitimate rejection of the system will intensify.
An archaic trust in "justice" and "democracy" will disappear. Normal people will be saying,
"F**k the police." They are an oppressive, corrupt and politicised organisation. This is no
longer a 1950s Norman Rockwell world.
Trump bloviated how "I'll be there with you." "We have to fight." "Fight much harder!"
"Trial by combat!"
But Trump didn't lead. He went home.
Now he tells them, "You will pay."
They face long sentences, and persecution by a corrupt and politicised judicial system, for
putting their faith in him.
um
"They put the fear of God into a vile, evil criminal elite, just by going into the Belly of
The Beast, staying within the velvet rope barriers."
Are you sure about that?
Agreed that legit rejection will intensify – at least as much as can be done.
I'd say Trump will be paid off by the billionaire's banker's boy's club (BBBC) for having
played his part well. The crisis actors who 'stormed the bastille' will also be paid off
(somewhat less than Trump), and released from jail after a short time.
They are all paid actors. Jan 10, 2021 1:59 PM
Surveying the comments below, I see we're having yet another round of that stale old
debate as to whether Trump is getting his ass kicked by the swamp, or in fact is part of that
swamp he claims to be fighting.
So let me just cut that whole debate short by saying this: it was never about Trump
personally. It was always about us as a people. The votes that were stolen on Nov. 3, 2020
were ours , not his. It was a crime against us, not him. That's why this matters. Because a
large percentage–probably a majority–of the American voters realize that the
democracy is over. It's now either revolution or a 'great reset' trans-humanist dictatorship.
It's now either victory or death.
Which option will the people choose? I wish I knew. But that is now the only choice they
have left.
It's now either revolution or a 'great reset' trans-humanist dictatorship.
That's what we're telling ourselves now. In a few years' time other paths may be visible:
a trans-humanist dictatorship in one state, a revolution in another state, with possibly a
war between them, or between now and then.
Here's a thought for the swamp journalists, MSM 'anchors' etc etc.
Given as how you have all stridently demanded the removal of all basic human rights of all
humans across the Western World, how about you self-righteous presstitutes have one
inalienable human right of 'journalists' removed too, eh?
Make it a criminal offence with 5 yrs in prison to publish a single article at any
accredited 'media organisation' without publishing at the bottom a fully audited account of
your current salary as an employee, your income from any specific groupings (like energy
sector, green lobbies, the EU etc etc etc) over the past 5 years and the value of your house
if you own it and the city/town that you live in. Furthermore, you will publish the exact
value of your earnings since March 1st 2020.Finally, you will publish where you went on
holiday since March 1st 2020, with whom you went and what it cost.
I think it would be very important for the general public to read: 'Oh, all those
London-based bedwetters are on well north of one hundred grand a year. None of them saw a
decline in salary during lockdown and half the b***ards were swanning off to the Caribbean
over Christmas. And well north of half of them own houses worth more than a million quid.
Nice ..'
I have zero tolerance for Andrew Marr et al claiming they any longer have any right to
personal privacy. They called for lockdown, now they can live with their financial trousers
firmly down around their feet ..
Pander Ralph , Jan 10, 2021 10:26 AM Reply to
Rhys Jaggar
You totally misunderstand how the neoliberal conscientious works, it is not funded by
demons, or a huge conspiracy, these people are not corrupt, they are just complicit. Like you
are complicit with many of illusions and lies fed you by the propaganda machine. If you
search your own soul you'll find you believe a lot of illusions created for you by the
ideology you live in.
finklefacker , Jan 10, 2021 10:30 AM Reply to
Rhys Jaggar
Publications by any one for any purpose are not the problem, in fact if the other side
does not publish there is nothing to attack and no understanding about the intentions of the
other side is made possible.
Publishing is a selection process.. The MSM merely says what the narrative will be and
selects for publication, only those writings or art, that fit the narrative.
But can the audience find a weakness in the rule: <=to publish only writings or art
that engage the appointed narrative ?
Does the audience have the technology, power, and strength to influence which contents
will be published in response to the narrative selection process? IF not, why not, if so, how
can that influence be applied? In my opinion the audience needs to gain control over what is
published. so to me, the major problem for our society in 2021 is to discover how to use
ourselves (the audience) to influence and even control the output from the publishing
domain.
LoveEwe , Jan 10, 2021 11:55 AM Reply to
Rhys Jaggar
Nice post as usual Rhys but the MSM racket has full 'Mob' protection as long as they keep
taking the money. The new revolving door between the BBC and corporations in Britain alone is
an indicator of how deeply corrupt they've become.
The BBC are no more than a misinformation racket that the general public have to pay for.
Informing people how to rid themselves of the license ransom should be at full steam.
What goes on in Trump's head is not interesting -- nor is your opinion of the man.
As Willem says, we have no idea what's in Trump's mind, any more than we know of yours, or
you of mine. We should abandon this 20th century style of history in which a Hugh Trevor
Roper presumes to read Hitler's or Churchill's mind.
Trump's presidency exposed the wurst of the state and all the unspeakable parts that go
into making it.
Peter Strzok stroked his stalk in the public's face.
Objectively Trump's presidency was a watershed . Historians and political analysts should
seize upon this administration to expose how government really works (they'll claim they knew
all along, and then consign the knowledge to the dustbin).
You can hate Trump (which politicians do you love?) but he served a valuable purpose. He
showed us how government works in all our countries: the superiority of the bureaucrat, who
conspires against the people, for the institution's benefit as the corporations pull the
strings.
The key takeaways:
The Epstein scandal and cover up, which briefly exposed how sex
trafficking is used to entrap and blackmail politicians. Epstein's collusion with
"philanthropists" like Gates to buy scientists and the media. The utter corruption of the
judiciary. A president cannot get a hearing, let alone justice. Not even a ruling on
something as important as a general election. The evolution of the military industrial
complex into the pharma-military-tech-media complex. The power of the biggest industries:
warfare, drugs licit and illicit, trafficking and slavery and energy. The rise of the
Corporatist State The subversion of sovereignty as Corporations cease paying tax, while
demanding the right to set trans-national rules for their own benefit.
He smashed the two party paradigm forever. If you still believe in the party system after
witnessing the RINOs kissing Biden's ring what is there to say?
History will probably airbrush the fraudulent election from the picture. We got to witness
how the sausage is made, to paraphrase Bismark. I wonder what other history we imbibed with
mother's milk that was thus contaminated at source?
Moneycircus , Jan 10, 2021 11:03 AM Reply to
Moneycircus
Andre , Jan 10, 2021 11:36 AM Reply to
Moneycircus
And he is not finished yet: how does the author know nothing can happen in this time till
Jan.20th? Can he reveal Biden as a traitor? Military Tribunals instead of useless civil legal
courts who don't dare to start a trial relating to fraudulent elections? Trump also exposed
the opportunists who switched sides to save their positions. This author might be part of
those who turn critical while pretending to always appreciated what Trump has actually done
as is described here above (by "Moneycircus").
Laurence Howell , Jan 10, 2021 11:58 AM Reply to
Andre
Insurrection Act.
Seamus Padraig , Jan 10, 2021 12:41 PM Reply to
Moneycircus
Exactly, Money. That was the real benefit of the Trump presidency: finally exposing the
system–to the satisfaction of tens of millions of Americans–for what it really
is. But the swamp is far too powerful for one man (even a president) to stop. The 'storm' is
going to have to be us .
mr spam , Jan 10, 2021 2:27 PM Reply to
Moneycircus
20 years ago, the media was already carefully and systematically inserting him into
popular culture like top-rated TV shows – from 'Friends' through 'Sex and the City' to
his very own, you're-fired 'Apprentice'. Correct me if I'm wrong – this only happens
with individuals who are very, very useful to the hidden elites.
James Robertson , Jan 10, 2021 8:49 AM Reply to
Willem
Indeed, the first sentence had me retching. Unbelievable that people still think they can
roll out this utter bullshit and people will lap it up. Still, it has worked until now.
Speculating about someone's intentions or sincerity is laughable four years into the
leadership of the most powerful nation on earth.
It is perfectly clear that the Trump presidency was a complete non event save for a futile
culture war, the circus that masked the fact that nothing of substance changed during this
term.
It might as well have been Barack Obama or George W. Bush for all the difference there was
on any fundamental issue.
I have never been a fan of this author but with this piece I lost all respect for him. The
same goes for everyone who were accessories to conning the rubes for the past four years. I am
genuinely stunned that these schmucks think they can keep pumping this bilge out.
Fred Harris , Jan 10, 2021 4:05 PM Reply to
Willem
YesWillem, I agree, and he ignores what was the big delemma for Trump. He fell for the White
House COVID Task Force lies. No government wants to lose power because they did nothing so he
reacted to pressure and precaution not science and fact. That was the begining of his undoing.
He was scared of loosing popularity. The tricked him using fear tactics. Similar to Johnsons
capitulation.
He also fails to state In October 2019, President Trump signed an
an executive order to curb what he called abuses of authority by unaccountable bureaucrats
who were "imposing their private agendas" on Americans.
Thom , Jan 10, 2021 8:34 AM
The 'deep state' still needs a state, however. The military-industrial complex still needs
to be funded. At the moment, they can rely on the tech stock market bubble but even these
corporations are vulnerable, as they are reliant on US military power and influence to enforce
around the world what are basically anti-competitive monopolies. As soon as Amazon, Google,
Facebook, Microsoft and the rest are subjected to proper competition, their value will
collapse. And at that point, these corporations will have plundered the US economy so that
there is nothing else left.
True – but this only goes to show why the term "deep state" is a highly unsatisfactory
one.
They openly tell us (e.g. through the WEF) that it's a fusion of public and private –
and one of the takeaways from the Trump Presidency is that if the two clash the corporations
win.
BTW I don't trust him but I thought Jospeh P. Farrell's insight that there seems to be a
chain of literal swamps running through the world's main centers of power for many centuries
was a good one. Venice, Amsterdam and D.C. were all undoubtedly swamps and the same is arguable
about the City of London (which Farrell didn't argue – he took it as a metaphor). Whether
this reveals that there is something in the argument about maritime law that some advocate I
couldn't say.
Seansaighdeor , Jan 10, 2021 11:15 AM Reply to
Edwige
The LaRouche Pac site offers the idea that London is the hub for this 'network' something I
have an open mind about.
Certainly from their involvement in the Steele dossier and their role in trying to subvert
the presidency it presents some interesting evidence.
One of the most unsettling aspects of the last four years is the intentional effort to
rewrite history in the media to fit a narrative either by denying facts or echoing clearly
false statements.
The recent stories on the riot in Congress is a good example.
Most of us denounced Trump's speech (as it was being given) and, of course, the rioting
itself. Some, however, have noted that there have been violent protests for years, including
the protest in Lafayette Square. The fact that there have been violent protests by the left
does not take away from the disgraceful
attack on Congress . Yet, there seems a controlling narrative that must be maintained at
all costs -- portraying past protests by groups on the left as peaceful to magnify the
criticism of the recent violence in Congress.
Even a site ironically called
Media Matters published a piece not only calling the Lafayette protest peaceful but
repeating a long discredited claim about the controversial Trump photo op.
The Lafayette Park protests occurred over multiple days and the clearing operation was
ordered as a result of a decision made before the final day to establish a greater perimeter to
protect the White House complex and immediate surrounding area -- much as the same fence
perimeter was used last week on Capitol Hill. The operation was carried out, in my view, in an
abusive way due to the level of force deployed and, as discussed below, the charging of the
police line. They could have cleared the area without that level of force in my judgment, as I
discussed in my testimony.
The Media Matters article by Bobby Lewis is illustrative an array of
such media pieces. It was sent to my attention by a reader due to a reference to an interview
that I did this week:
"Fox contributor Jonathan Turley compared the Capitol attack to "the
Lafayette Park incident," a June 2020 Black Lives Matter protest he falsely described as "an
attack on the White House." What
actually happened was federal security forces
tear-gassed protesters and media, without warning or serious provocation, in order to
violently clear a path for a Trump photo-op in front of a
church whose leaders did not want him there ."
Other sites have described the Lafayette Park protests as "
peaceful. "
One site called Quartz said the protests were " entirely
peaceful " and objected that there was no "attack on the White House."
That is simply not true. Quartz was open in how it construed the protest as peaceful by
referring to only the final day. While that claim is contested by law enforcement which showed
objects being thrown at police , it simply ignores that the order to clear the area was due to
the preceding violence of the prior two days.
As discussed in my testimony, there was an exceptionally high number of officers injured
during the protests around the White House complex.
Some 150 officers were injured during the protests and half of those were injured around
the White House . The Justice Department claimed 750 injured officers during the various
protests. What is clear that is dozens of officers were injured and there are videotapes of
officers hit by frozen bottles, bricks and other missiles . For two days, the violence
continued with the burning of a historic structure, extensive property damage and the attempted
burning down of the historic St. John's Church. The attacks around the complex were so great
that the President was moved into the bunker and officers said that they were concerned that
the complex might be breached.
It is also untrue that the area was cleared "in order to violently clear a path for a Trump
photo-op." A wide array of witnesses and documents detailed how the plan to clear the area was
put into motion over 24 hours before the actual operation -- and long before any discussion of
a photo op. The Park Police wanted to expand the perimeter to protect the White House and the
plan was approved by then Attorney General Bill Barr. It was delayed because the officers were
waiting for both fencing material and back-up personnel. When the personnel and fencing
arrived, they proceeded with the operation. Barr repeatedly denied having knowledge of Trump's
desire for a photo op which arose long after the plan was approved.
At the hearing, I testified that I believed that there were unlawful actions taken in the
operation. The final police charge appeared unjustified as was an attack on a media crew. I
also criticized with the level of force used and suggested an array of inquiries for Congress
to pursue in these areas of possible illegality.
However, the record and videotapes demonstrate that there was a high level of violence and
destruction in Lafayette Park. Indeed, there are analogies to the situation at the Capitol. As
with the Capitol, National Guard personnel were brought in after the violence had occurred.
Indeed, in Lafayette Park, there was violence for two days before the deployment and the
clearing of the area. In both situations, fencing was added to protect an expanded
perimeter.
The point is not to defend either law enforcement operation. Indeed, I was highly critical
of the clearing of Lafayette Park due to the excessive force used by the Park Police. However,
it is simply not true that the Lafayette Park protests were peaceful as demonstrated by the
high number of law enforcement injuries and extensive property damage . Even on the day of the
clearing of the area, there was some violence. However, when the park was cleared, there was
not the violence of the preceding days. That is why the level of force was excessive. The
reports of a "peaceful" protest intentionally omits the violence leading up to the plan to
expand the perimeter. The clearing of the park was not to address the immediate violence in the
park. It was approved earlier to clear the park to protect the complex. Thus, there had been
considerable violence and destruction but there was not such violence at the time of the
clearing of the park. That is what happened in Lafayette Square.
I fail to see why such facts cannot be recognized and still criticize actions in both
operations. Indeed, you can make the valid point that the effort to stop a
constitutional act in Congress is a far greater threat to our system. Yet, there is no need
to revise the facts to make those points. Indeed, they are more compelling when presented in a
frank and honest way. We cannot reach a consensus as a nation if we are demanding answers based
on diametrically opposed facts. There is clarity -- and a truth -- to be found in these
incidents but it will take people of good faith to reach achieve that vital goal.
18 play_arrow 1
OceanX 3 hours ago
" We don't know what was going on in that laboratory ."
I bet if you 'squeezed' billy gates' and tony fauci's neck you could gain a LOT of
insights!
skbull44 3 hours ago
So, where can we find archived copies that everyone can download to prevent total erasure
and a reformulation of history?
What year was the funding moratorium lifted and who was the president that year?
Nemtsov 4 minutes ago
The moratorium went into effect in Oct 2014, meaning that the research had been underway
for years prior (and Dr. Fauci would have been directly in the decision chain). What
administration came into power in Jan 2009 I wonder. If you want to cast arrows, take it up
with the
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
Medicine , which advised on the resumption after review of new protocols. Francis Collins
signed off on all this, and this would not have been a line item sign-off that would have
crossed the President's desk.
Mr. Rude Dog 2 hours ago remove link
The virus did not destroy our economy, or harm the United States...Simply put - it was our
own reaction based on the information provided by our so-called experts.
We destroyed our own economy with bad medical advice, propagated by our own media...We
should look at our so called experts and their connections to global government...The
traitors are within our own walls..!!
vril PRO 3 hours ago (Edited) remove link
Except we do know what was going on the that lab...
You know who else does? Donny! Of course, globalist zio-pawn he is, Trump isn't willing to
indulge us with the truth. He's guarded the NIH-funded GoF research as closely as the Epstein
tapes. It's exactly why he's never been able to go after Fauci. Remember during the task
force press conferences when he would allude to Obama starting those grants through
Fauci?
It was true but the Obama administration put a moratorium on it in 2012 and again in 2014
when the funding pause became indeterminant in consideration of the level of risk the
research presented.
However, the ban on that funding was lifted under Trump himself in 2017 when Fauci's NIH:
NIAID had
lobbied extensively for the ban to be lifted in the interest of "global health
preparedness" against things such a pandemic threats. such as after the agency determined it
was creating more effective safeguards against the risk of a biologically engineered virus
"escaping."
The Trump administration willfully obliged . In the event the administration wasn't
complicit why wouldn't their air the grievances against Fauci for not coming up with better
safeguards? That alone would be appropriate grounds for termination...
I've already done this rather extensively but make sure to research Charles Lieber's network of labs . Lieber was given
assimilation into the Harvard network, grants from the
university , NIH and
DoD , etc. Lieber was only one of at least
54 other scientists to receive grants despite their ties to foreign governments. Lieber
himself was employed by the Wuhan Institute of Technology to the tune of about 50k a month.
This came to light following his arrest when CCP spies who worked for several of his labs
were arrested for attempting to smuggle biologically active material back to China via
passenger airlines.
Many of Lieber's grants from the NIH were explicitly to set up a campus for his biological
research in China at the Wuhan Institute of Technology. While most investigative research
into the origins of the COVID-19 virus center around the Wuhan Institute of Virology,
understanding the network of research labs it was a part of is key to examining the origins
of the lab-made virus. Lieber creating the That was how those Chinese spies part of the
Thousand Talents Program he employed were given student visas so easily.
The application of Lieber's research goes well beyond the ******** viral science. That was
the basis by which his biological nanotechnology, like the nanolipids used to transport mRNA
in these Covid-19 vaccines...
"... What struck me was the behavior of most of the House's invaders: they for the most were pranksters. For them it was Halloween; not the storming of the Bastille! ..."
"... This is all pretty mild stuff. Useful to see that Washington is not so different to Kiev. With the Biden presidency you can certainly add the USA to the list of countries ruled by governments put in place by colour revolutions ..."
"... The images that arise from this event will remain iconic. It possibly was a shaperoned event, but the plan, that anger would be wide-spread and destruction abundant did not materialize. This is evident in the bizarre, concocted, pre-written M5M media reports. It was a trap, but it backfired. ..."
"... The French police official said they believed that an investigation would find that someone interfered with the deployment of additional federal law-enforcement officials on the perimeter of the Capitol complex; the official has direct knowledge of the proper procedures for security of the facility. ..."
"... someone interfered with the proper deployment of officers around Congress ..."
"... I was surprised but pleased to see Americans demonstrating their contempt for the hostile elite government we live under. Assault against Democracy? BS. ..."
"... But nobody should delude themselves into thinking that Donald Trump is a patriot who will die for the cause. Hell, he already threw the people risking their lives and liberty protesting the fraudulent election under the bus. It is long past time the whores in Washington become acutely aware of the contempt sane Americans have for them. I do not support violent protests, but I do support a mass demonstration of people expressing their total and absolute contempt for the traitorous whores who rule over us. ..."
But for me, I was no less happy to see the Republicans on the run. After all, it is they who
have been stoking the anger and resentment of populist Americans, secure in their belief that
they had conjured a monster they completely controlled and that they could endlessly exploit
for their own purposes no matter what they did. Well, that monster turned around and bit them
on their fleeing asses on Wednesday. The "people," whom they love to claim they represent, went
from being an ideological abstraction to an angry mob after they felt cheated and decided to
take matters into their own hands. It's important to remember that,
according to reports , what first inspired the protesters to descend on the Capitol was
when word reached them that Pence had refused to challenge the certification of the Electoral
College result. They weren't just angry at the Democrats; they were angry at the whole lot of
them.
... For me, the Capitol occupation was a spontaneous and dramatic expression of the white
working class' frustration with the Washington establishment and an indication that they won't
tolerate a return to business as usual. The Democrats -- and more than a few Republicans --
blocked and worked against Trump's agenda from the day he took office. Stealing the election
was merely the final prong in their assault on him and on the wishes of ordinary Americans. If
Washington doesn't begin to take populist demands seriously, violence is inevitable.
... This means they have to stop attributing the fact that working-class whites aren't on
board with their agenda to the influence of scapegoats like Trump or conspiracy theories and
instead finally recognize that our nation's yeomanry have legitimate grievances that won't go
away just because Trump does.
For its part, the American Left, which now has Biden as its figurehead, really has no moral
authority whatsoever to condemn the Capitol occupation given that they've been bending over
backward to excuse the violence of BLM and Antifa for years now. Remember "punch a Nazi"?
Not that these are in any way comparable to what happened in the Capitol; BLM and Antifa
violence has resulted in
dozens of deaths , rapes, other violence, and untold billions in property damage across the
United States. The Capitol protesters, by contrast, were mostly peaceful and caused very little
serious damage (if there had been extensive damage it seems unlikely the House would have been
able to reconvene so quickly). Most importantly, they were not attacking innocent bystanders'
private property. There also doesn't seem to have been much looting apart from a few items
taken as pranks; compare this to the scenes we witnessed from Minneapolis last
spring , when we saw black rioters stripping entire shopping centers down to their
frames.
The Left, of course, will never accept this logic; for them, the occupation was the next
Charlottesville, if not the next 9/11 -- but we have to never cease from reminding them of
their hypocrisy. In looking at the photos of politicians scurrying for cover as the protesters
began to break into the House chamber, I was reminded of the mockery that Trump took from
Democratic politicians back in May when word got out that he had been briefly sent to the
emergency
bunker beneath the White House after it had been besieged by BLM rioters . There's also a
delicious irony in the fact that some of the politicians who have been calling for police
departments to be defunded were hiding behind these very same police when their constituents
came calling.
On Wednesday, the world heard the voice of American populism. It wasn't Trump's voice; it
was that of the American people. And perhaps, just perhaps, the people are beginning to rule.
This isn't about Trump anymore -- it didn't start with Trump and it certainly won't end with
him. As for myself, all I can say is that, for the first time in a while, on that day I
actually felt proud to be an American.
Mostly some good and correct points in this article. Yes, Antifa was there, and Capital
police expected them. Yes, Washington's corrupt Capital police also did welcome surprised
Trump supporters into the building and even to the area where Ashli was assassinated. How do
you think there were no less than 5 videos of the murder from 4 angles? Trump supporters were
flabbergasted, nonviolent and wondering for the most part how they got so far.
But the END RESULT was a bizarre attempt to REMOVE TRUMP IMMEDIATELY – by any means
(25th or impeach – neither will succeed). Do you really think that end result is the
product of chance or circumstance? Do you really think Pelosi is foaming at the teeth because
she truly believes Trump is ready to enter the launch codes (give me a break)?
In point of fact, because the civilized legal process has been completely exhausted, we
now reach the military option, as in executive order on foreign interference in US elections.
This means, in the end, a military tribunal convened to prosecute treason. This is the reason
certain conspirators are soiling their Depends undergarments.
But how it will end when you have the global banking interests of "the Guardians" as a
foe, with their 10 trillion in play? This is a 5th generation world war unlike any before it.
Humanity is at stake.
Congress hasn't had any clothes for years. It was difficult to imagine anything that could
make Americans despise congress more. But look at this.
(You need Tor Browser Bundle to see it, and if you don't have it, Why the fuck not?)
Physically cowering in fear of the people they've fucked for all these years.
This is the single most compelling evidence for CIA LIHOP. This quirky peasant uprising
and its public happiness scared congress much more than CIA's anthrax attacks. Now congress
will do what they're told, take their AIPAC bribes and hide behind high walls.
It's the USA [neoliberlaism] that has no clothes...
Congress has no clothes because it's the best little whorehouse in America.
By the way, Twitter banning Trump is a great thing. Mass purge is actually better for
us.
The problem with limited purges was that most cons and patriots still stuck with Big Tech
because there was still enough freedom and conservative material available. But when Big Tech
goes whole hog and censors so many people, it will force a Techession(tech-secession or
techxodus) among millions and millions of people, and this will make Alt Tech far more
viable. Indeed, Alt Tech can turn into counter-tech and the Big Other Tech.
People who were too lazy to get off their butts and join Alt Tech will now have no
choice.
Big Tech could maintain monopoly as long as they just banned people like Alex Jones. But
when they ban the president and so many of his followers, they are forcing the creation of
the Big Other Tech, and that will end the monopoly.
The people's anger is real. Trump is a false prophet. He's nothing but a Jew loving
blowhard, a con man with a below average IQ. He campaigned on draining the swamp but staffed
his entire cabinet with nothing but swamp creatures, because he *is* the swamp. He's just
been cast aside because the puppet masters have found an even more corrupt puppet that they
can extort. The patriots who have been protesting the election deserve someone better, a real
deal like Kris Kobach.
This election exposes just how corrupt this country has become, from top to bottom, not
just the Executive branch and the legislative branch, but even the judiciary branch is now
completely corrupt from the very top, the Chief Justice of SCOTUS. Jews now have firm control
on every institution of import in this country, from Wall Street to Hollywood, DC to SV and
everywhere in between, media, academia, publishing industry, healthcare, everything. Patriots
now have our backs against the Wall. There's no place else to turn to. We either fight our
way out or die.
The Roman empire lasted 1,000 years, from 500BC to 500AD. In the first half, Rome was
ruled by elected emperors, and in the second half, by unelected emperors. Rome ruled for 500
years, peaked for 200, and fell for 300 years. It was a long, slow death. America was on the
ascendance for 300 years, peaked for 50 years (1945-1995), and has been on a decline the last
25 years. The next 75 will be a long, slow, increasingly painful death as we eventually get
swallowed whole by huns and visigoths.
"But the END RESULT was a bizarre attempt to REMOVE TRUMP IMMEDIATELY – by any
means (25th or impeach – neither will succeed). Do you really think that end result is
the product of chance or circumstance? Do you really think Pelosi is foaming at the teeth
because she truly believes Trump is ready to enter the launch codes (give me a
break)?"
Strange they are unable to wait for less than two weeks for inauguration. These people are
truly evil. It's like what did Trump ever do to them that is so personal?
What struck me was the behavior of most of the House's invaders: they for the most
were pranksters. For them it was Halloween; not the storming of the Bastille!
Were I an investor I'd be buying up stocks in private security firms. Just today I viewed
a video of that hideous old quean, Lindsay Graham plodding and plunging through an airport
passageway on the way (presumably) to his home in South Carolina. All the way he was being
harassed, shouted at and called a "traitor" for his RINO collusion in the takedown of the
Trumpster.
Then there is the case of Mike Pence. After his refusal to call the question on the
Constitutional approach to denying any confirmation of electors from either party, making way
for either a compromise (as was reached in a similar kerfuffle in the 1876 showdown between
Democrat Samuel Tilden and Republican Rutherfraud Hayes) or to call for new elections in the
challenged and conflicted swing states; Pence has been broadly excoriated as a traitor who
weaseled his way out of supporting the president's back-up plan.
Next, we fast-forward to those photos of Congressional prostiticians cowering behind their
seats as the "deplorables" streamed into the sacred chambers of the people's house. A lot of
guilty consciences in that zoo. They well know they either sold out for hefty campaign
contributions and money under the table or are being blackmailed through the workings of
Epstein, Maxwell and Wexner on behalf I$rael's Mo$$ad or maybe a dozen other intel agencies,
most specifically Britain's MI-6 and the shot-callers (think 11-22-63 in Dallas) who rule
through other deep state organs, the CIA.
Private security agencies will be getting a.lot of calls from terrified prostiticians and
many others who have been working for the enemies of WE THE PEOPLE. Consider those talking
heads on boobtoob noose who are paid handsomely for constant repetition of a false reality
paradigm which has entrapped all those suburban soccer moms who were mind-controlled into
voting for the Kamala's Foote/Biden ticket. Awakeners by the millions have been curing
themselves of the boobtoob noose habit. Do you think the teevee presenters are sleeping
peacefully these days and soon about to enjoy high times at fancy resorts and pricey
restaurants?
How about professors and other academics who get the call to appear as talking-heads on
PB$ and spread erudite sounding barf and garbage as fast as they spread their legs for all
those shekels and the public recognition?
Are gated communities with patrolling guards and cameras galore, places where powerful
movers and shakers tend to live will those havens (or those high-rise apartment suites
surrounding Central Park -- or placid neighborhoods in Georgetown or Bel-Air–) likely
to feel safe from now on?
Private Security services. That's where I'd invest. The "Deplorables" are pissed off at
the stolen election and even more so at the political duopoly constituting government of the
prostiticians, by the deep $tate bureaucratic Administrators and for the plutocratic
oligarchs.
As of January 6th, 2021 the status of our country devolved into a totally ruptured
republic. Democracy? Fuggidaboutit.
About 95% of the US media, and about 70% of US politicians are corrupt deep-state
globalists (which makes them implicitly treasonous). The source of their deep-state globalist
power is central banking, usury, and enslaving us goyim with debt and "the love of money".
The last president who was not a treasonous globalist was Reagan (although most of his
cabinet were globalists including VP Bush). President Trump has been constantly under attack
by this deep-state globalist cult because he is not an obedient member of their club and has
been irreverently exposing their hand.
Nothing will change: the US and the rest of the western civilization will eventually
succumb to this cancerous globalist corruption unless the cancer is removed. This is not
about politics: it's about removing the cancerous corruption before the cancer destroys its
host.
Thank God President Trump has exposed their hand and has got the ball rolling. Now it is
up to us: to step up and continue the populist movement that he started.
This truly is the end of the Banana Empire. I say "God bless Trump" only because he set
into motion the end of this tyranny; like Kerensky he was largely clueless as to the extent
of the rot.
This is the beginning of the end. Best case scenario the United States returns to
democracy.
No matter what the cause, there was evidence of agents provocateurs present who inflamed
the violence, and the reaction, calling those who opposed the regime candidate "terrorists"
is going to lead to more serious unrest, particularly if as appears likely, kangaroo courts
begin rounding up people for trial. The thing is, close to a majority already suspect that
the fix was in in November, and the fact the same methods of fraud were successfully employed
in Georgia's senate races inflamed the anger. Proof of agents provocateurs is abundant. Even
the guy dressed up in a viking suit whose photograph is run with the article apparently was
an antifa figure.
Since the regime's coordinated reaction is attempting to turn this into a sort of
Reichstag fire to eliminate opposition to a consolidated deep state fascist regime, we are in
for turbulent times. I suspect the tacticians, despite what the author says, actually are
hoping for a serious response before the opposition can effectively organize, and the regime
operatives are too arrogant to care about the economic consequences, and the likelihood that
the numerous vassal states may use the instability as a means of securing a greater degree of
independence from the yankee imperium.
This is all pretty mild stuff. Useful to see that Washington is not so different to
Kiev. With the Biden presidency you can certainly add the USA to the list of countries ruled
by governments put in place by colour revolutions
The best way for Trumps place in history to be magnified and consolidated would be for
them to imprison him and take away all of his assets (he'd become like a mini Jesus), though
I am guessing this is the only reason he has not been assassinated, yet.
The images that arise from this event will remain iconic. It possibly was a shaperoned
event, but the plan, that anger would be wide-spread and destruction abundant did not
materialize. This is evident in the bizarre, concocted, pre-written M5M media reports. It was
a trap, but it backfired. I for one likely would have ransacked the place. I must admit
I am impressed with their disinterest in marauding. It was an important event, cherish its
iconic imagery, for darkness, subversion and false flags will take our guns away and reduce
the flame of patriotism to pilot size soon.
I've seen at least two videos of the Capitol police opening steel fences at one point and
doors at another point only two stand aside and calmly allow protesters to pour in. Looked
more like an invitation than an invasion. Obviously they had orders to stand back at those
points.
What a wonderful moment to see all the Congressional rabble hitting the decks.
Next time the protesters should bring a guillotine!
Key word, there, "dramatic." And it apparently makes no difference how corny it is
(goofball with the horns and even Trump himself) or how idiotic, (the masked moron response
to COVID and installing senile Joe on the throne).
Drama is a force that gives empty heads meaning, or at least a bit of entertainment while
our owners mock and manipulate us at their adolescent pleasure.
I would have enjoyed it more – had 2 million armed Iraqis, Afghanis, Syrians,
Libyans, Yemenis, Ukrainians, and others , that have had their countries wasted by the USA ,
storm the Capital and get even with those that voted and supported those murderous
invasions.
If he's out in 11 days anyway, why the push to impeach? Pure spite?
It has been suggested that if the Dems could get DT impeached before his time is up then
they could attach legislation to his verdict stating that he could never run for any office
again.
Some on the Left are terrified that he will come back in 2024 and the same 75M Maga people
will be waiting to sweep him back in office.
IMO in 2024 KH as Prez is a sure thing -- -people will be shamed into voting for her to
avoid being called a racist AND a sexist.
Realizing that not only his political but also his personal future might be in jeopardy,
Trump was quick to concede the election and promise a peaceful transition of power --
showing that when things get tough, it's his own hide that he's thinking of.
"Trump was quick to concede the election" -- That's the part I somehow missed hearing over
here in central Europe, perhaps because not all the relevant news is reported here. Would the
author quote the words the president used to do that?
Conceding the election, as I understand it, is something he could have done any time since
Nov. 3, making our shadow government very happy. Since mainstream media spent the next two
months loudly demanding that he "concede the election", they must also have missed those
magic words.
Conceding the election not only acknowledges a valid election was held but also makes
monkeys out of the skeptical people who voted for Trump and answered his call to rally in
Washington Jan. 6. Are you saying that?
Or does conceding a U.S. election now equate to saying the election was rigged and it
looks like not a damned thing we can do about it?
A fitting end to the Trump movement, seeing as there was never anything in terms of a
structure to organise the political base except for a ludicrous conspiracy prank (i.e.
'Qanon'). The whole thing has been a diversionary venture to corral dissent and neutralise
it. It might 'feel good to see patriots in the Capitol Building' but -shorn of any genuine
movement, all that really amounts to is .well feelings .
Real populism looks quite different surely, and so do real insurrections. There was no
'invasion', the security was stepped down and they opened the doors for the crowd to walk in.
A spectacle to advance an agenda.
I must admit as an American abroad that I felt a little Schadenfreude -- having watched
the left burn America through the summer, it was about time the populists got a crack at it
-- but I had this nagging feeling this would end very unpleasantly for all; there's an old
adage that if you take a shot at the crown, you'd better not miss. That feeling was confirmed
as CNN started trumpeting this as being an insurrection, which was picked up by the politicos
in short order. It's hard to dismiss out of hand that this was a false flag because the
leftists almost immediately had the language and narrative and an action plan in hand to
finally put the populist genie back in the bottle. Then again, maybe they're just quick on
their feet.
If this was planned, as some above suggest, then I'm really disappointed at the lack of
thought given to this. Taking the Capitol was never going to seriously result in a change of
government in a country that has been practising Continuity of Government exercises for
three-quarters of a century, and at best would only be a symbolic protest. Having taken the
Capitol, this was never going to end well for those participating in the frolic, as we will
see in the coming weeks as more average Joes and Janes are dragged into court (do you think
Buffalo-boy will stand in the dock?). So why not make the best of what was going to be a shit
sandwich anyway?
Instead of walking through the halls of the Capitol, taking selfies, and then going home
when "asked" to leave, they should have taken a page out of Occupy Wall Street and settled in
for the long hall. The left would have shown up with pre-printed signs, some of which would
have looked amateurish enough to seem authentic. Where were these guys' signs?
They should have filled every seat in "the Peoples' House" with real people holding signs
saying "We are the People" with a few thousand more people sitting peacefully in all the
corridors and steps and waiting passively for the the police or military to carry them away.
That would have taken days, if not weeks, and would have put a serious damper on the
inevitable inauguration.
Politicians and their fellow bureaucrats have opened the door to the real barbarians;
corporate fascism, influence of special interest lobbies in Congress, foreign entanglements
(Israel) , endless war, unaccountable government within the ever expanding sixteen
Intelligence Agencies, secrecy in place of democracy, the authority to print currency handed
over to oligarchs at the Federal Reserve Board, who are, in reality a collection of banksters
and financiers- not an agency of the federal government as the organizations' name would have
all of us believe.
If there ever was a time for revolution and dissolution of a thoroughly corrupted
government (for every western Occident country) the time is now.
The corporate-fascist infection began under Ford the stumbler, he opened the door to The
NeoCons followed by Reagan the Union buster who did everything he could to dismantle FDR's
social democracy programs such as the CCC (infrastructure support), the social security
safety net. Reagan had a close association with the barbarism of Thatcher, she had a set of
horns much larger than that, so called "insurrectionist" buffoon who's face was plastered all
over newsprint today. Chavez was correct and I add, that a waft of sulfurous odor behind
Thatcher was shared by both Bushes. Strategies dedicated to endless war, endless predation(s)
for dwindling resources rather than embracing a philosophy that nourishes support for human
ingenuity and mutual trust between nations. Instead, adopting long range and global
domination plans outlined by Admiral Cebrowski and his assistant, Thomas P. M. Barnett, who
announced a new map of our world-according to the Pentagon that is. Visit Dr Henry Gaffney Jr
of the CNA Corporation.
ASIDE: This is what happens when an entire people allowed a post World War II dream to
die. The Kennedy Brothers dream of a new demilitarized era, and Western European style
Marshal Plan for third world countries who desired to attach themselves to the tail of our
kite (voluntarily) -Rest in peace John and Robert, I'll never let their guilt, control
freakishness or rapacity to go free !
Rusting bridges, potholed autobahns, with an emphasis on who owns them, not when
maintenance or repairs will be forthcoming-by extortion no doubt. Gaunt, vitamin deficient
citizenry, homelessness, epidemic drug addictions, who needs "society" haven't you heard?
Thatcher said there's no such thing as society!
Thus it seems improbable to me that the Deep State was willing to sacrifice the sense
of American invulnerability it projects across the globe simply in order to discredit the
populist movement when there are many other, less self-harming methods it could use
instead.
America's aura of invulnerability has been gone since September 11th 2001. Civil airliners
flown by a ragtag crew of "Islamists", if you believe the official story, smashed into the
WTC and the Pentagon. No fighter aircraft made any attempts to intercept them: they were
completely unhindered in their actions. The Deep State were willing to let thousands of
civilians die in order to achieve its own purposes.
Letting a couple of hundred people occupy the Capitol building for a short period of time
seems very minor in comparison.
Surely one of the first rules of the exercise of Power is to scrupulously avoid
demonstrating that you are a low grade coward. Now that the entire US Congress has been
videoed cowering in craven fear before an unarmed crowd, whose only "crime" is to seek
redress for a stolen election, there are going to be serious consequences.
How many foreign agents, and foreign powers, are now coming to the realization "hey, these
guys are bunch of pussies?" How many criminal organizations, in the USA or abroad, formerly
operating with some restraint, will now be freed from any restraint? And how many citizens of
the Republic, formerly circumspect to the Public Offices in our country, will now proceed to
operate with complete contempt of sniveling cowards in Public Office who seek to rule us?
The absolute lowest level of Degeneracy demonstrated by the Political Class is not in
their systematic sexual degeneracy, nor their relentless and despicable Negroaltry, nor their
thievery of anything they can steal, nor their relentless, pervasive, and relentless
dishonesty even when they would be much better served by the truth, but precisely in their
pervasive fear of everything Decent, including decent Americans.
So here we are, in the land of the Zoo Monkey Shit-eaters, faced with the only choice that
will ever have any real meaning for the rest of our lives:
What struck me was the behavior of most of the House's invaders: they for the most were
pranksters. For them it was Halloween; not the storming of the Bastille!
True.
Just another PR stunt that benefits nobody except the globalists.
The US have no clothes After decades and decades of warmongering & murdering innocent
people around the globe in the name of "democracy" (what a hypocritical sick joke!!!) to
steal and loot other nation's territories and resources now the true face of the USA is
visible to All: the face of a horrendous tyrannical evil monster serving not the american
people but the interests of a few billionnaires, master puppeteers in the dark. We knew it
all along: u are not a democracy and you are not an example to anyone.
All the contrary, you are an example of what not to be or what not to become.
You are and always have been a kleptocracy or something worse.
(wikypedia: Kleptocracy (from Greek κλέπτης
kléptēs, "thief", κλέπτω kléptō, "I
steal", and -κρατία -kratía from
κράτος krátos, "power, rule") is a government whose
corrupt leaders (kleptocrats) use political power to appropriate the wealth of their nation,
typically by embezzling or misappropriating government funds at the expense of the wider
population.)
One of the few among us who still is in possession of a functioning brain..
What should we expect in 2021?
So far, it looks like this year is going to be plagued by more of the same brand of
madness, mayhem, manipulation and tyranny that dominated 2020.
Frankly, I'm sick of it: the hypocrisy, the double standards, the delusional belief by
Americans at every point along the political spectrum that politics and politicians are the
answer to what ails the country, when for most of our nation's history, politics and
politicians have been the cause of our woes.
Consider: for years now, Americans, with sheeplike placidity, have tolerated all manner
of injustices and abuses meted out upon them by the government (police shootings of unarmed
individuals, brutality, corruption, graft, outright theft, occupations and invasions of
their homes by militarized police, roadside strip searches, profit-driven incarcerations,
profit-driven wars, egregious surveillance, taxation without any real representation, a
nanny state that dictates every aspect of their lives, lockdowns, overcriminalization,
etc.) without ever saying "enough is enough."
@Realist black
shirt thugs never went to prison. Antifa/blm are the shock troops for elitists like George
Soros, who are seeking to impose a new order, a global, neo-feudal system run solely by them
and solely for their benefit.
Antifa/blm are part of the machinery for achieving this neo-feudal vision, as are the
USA's Democrat-Republican establishment, DSMIC, and MSM. They will be dealt with when the new
order is achieved, just as Hitler dealt with the SA when they had served their purpose. All
populists, especially Trump supporters are an immediate threat to our would-be feudal
masters. Their eradication is a compelling necessity. There will be no mercy.
The French police official said they believed that an investigation would find that
someone interfered with the deployment of additional federal law-enforcement officials on the
perimeter of the Capitol complex; the official has direct knowledge of the proper procedures
for security of the facility.
someone interfered with the proper deployment of officers around Congress
It is routine for the Capitol Police to coordinate with the federal Secret Service and the
Park Police and local police in Washington, DC, before large demonstrations. The National
Guard, commanded by the Department of Defense, is often on standby too.
On Wednesday, however, that coordination was late or absent.
The National Guard, which was deployed heavily to quell the Black Lives Matter protests in
2020, did not show up to assist the police until two hours after the action started on
Wednesday, according to The Associated Press.
This is coordinated among different levels . ( think of 911 and lack of responses
preparedness and abuses of the drill )
Trump is a psycho who has convinced the low IQ white of him being a savior facing off deep
state which is against the poor white and which doesn't want Trump get elected . So the
election must be stolen .
And what's not good about fighting a thief or stealing ?
I was surprised but pleased to see Americans demonstrating their contempt for the
hostile elite government we live under. Assault against Democracy? BS. Perhaps there is
some fight left in the American people?
But nobody should delude themselves into thinking that Donald Trump is a patriot who
will die for the cause. Hell, he already threw the people risking their lives and liberty
protesting the fraudulent election under the bus. It is long past time the whores in
Washington become acutely aware of the contempt sane Americans have for them. I do not
support violent protests, but I do support a mass demonstration of people expressing their
total and absolute contempt for the traitorous whores who rule over us.
Pelosi, Schumer et al. want to pretend this was the burning of the Reichstag, so they can
take "appropriate" measures. They want to act with haste.
Pelosi and Schumer fear that people will realize, after looking at how for years Obama and
the left stoked racial hatred, which resulted in riots, murder and arson causing billions in
damage, this is, by comparison, a nothing-burger. Thus, haste is the order of the day.
Trump run his election complain of 2016 as champion of common Americans. After he won the
office the betrayed them all and governed like Bush III with his own cabal of neocons and
neoliberals. \
He betrayed his followed again on Dec 6, when he first incited them for the action but did not provide organization, security
and the plan needed to press Congress to appoint the commission for investigation of election "irregularities" for then days
before Biden inauguration. He is now completely spent politically and his enemies and first of all, Ms Pelosi, are after him.
Moreover he gave a shot in the arm for the gang of Russiagaters who were pursuing him
since his inauguration.
The fact that Trump leaves the political scene is good. While useful as a wrecking ball for
the neoliberal empire and neoliberal establishment he proved to be completely inept as
a politician and lack courage necessary for the national leader. Which he proved again on Dec 6. Famous quote from
Friedrich Schiller's play Fiesco "The Moor has done his duty. The Moor can go." is probably applicable. What is interesting
is that Zionists betrayed Trump.
But the fact hat he will be replaced by neocon warmonger and staunch neoliberal Biden means
that there is no light at the and of tunnel for the common people.
Like Trump, Biden was never Presidential material. He a a mediocre politician, by all
accounts. And extremely corrupt in addition to that.
Notable quotes:
"... Donald Trump denounced the people whom he personally called to protest. His close political allies withdrew their support. ..."
"... The deck was stacked against President Trump from Day One. His orders were ignored. The US courts, judges, police, the whole system of law enforcement was against him; his orders were blocked or overturned, while the media made fun of him and the opposition relentlessly delegitimised him. ..."
"... On January 6, a massive demonstration in his support gathered in Washington, DC. Hundreds of thousands Americans came to the capital to demand justice after the election fraud became obvious. They hoped that the Republican representatives would refuse to certify the fraud and appoint a commission to check and recount the votes. ..."
"... The horror and outrage of the Dem politicians and media were as faked as their news. During last year, many government buildings were taken over by Dem-sponsored BLM activists, and in not one case did the police use lethal weapons or even rush the protesters out of buildings. ..."
"... For them, it was an honest and funny way to express their indignation. But the real gambit plotters intended to frame them. They even murdered four protesters hoping they would respond with violence, but in vain. ..."
"... White American protesters are exceptionally non-violent lot; as with Occupy Wall Street a few years back the January 6 Capitol protesters were timid and obedient as lambs. For this reason, BLM was invented, for Blacks are able to riot violently, as opposed to well-trained whites. It is not a race thing: lily-white French Yellow Vests and Ukrainian nationalists have fought the police all right. But US whites are not prone to riot, not since the Civil War. ..."
"... Anyway, their non-violence didn't help them. The president-elect Biden begrudged them even the name of protesters: "Don't dare call them protesters. They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists." Indeed, the name should be preserved for Deep State-authorised looters and their brethren all over the world, whether in Hong Kong or Minsk, in Seattle or Portland. ..."
"... researchers will argue whether duplicitous Biden's minions organised it or just capitalised on the Trumpers' sincere protest. ..."
"... There is no doubt that to an objective observer the 2020 elections were profoundly unfair. I won't trouble you with too many published details about the statistically impossible results, but here is one example of fraud. The city of Detroit gave 95 per cent of its vote to Biden/Kamala, a number that Mr Kim Jong-un would view with slight envy, while Mr Lukashenko would murmur, "How can it be done?" It is highly likely this mind-boggling result was achieved in the following way. ..."
"... The problem is, Trump was a poor organiser. He could win elections, if he could prevent Cynthia Stephens's kind of legislation, outlaw postal ballots, enforce obligatory IDs for voting, mobilise his people for election control. A formidable task, but not impossible, while dealing with a prone-to-cheat adversary. He could even do a revolution on January 6, tasking the right people to act, forming a revolutionary HQ, planning a strategy of takeover, but he didn't do anything of the sort. He probably thought Congress would see the vast crowds and allow for the checking of election results. ..."
"... Alternatively, he was so naïve that he believed revolutions just happen by themselves, as in the movies. They do not. Behind every successful revolution, there is a lot of planning, armed force, weapons ready for use, supply lines, logistics, media support, and communications. Trump had none of that. It was enough to turn off Twitter to make him deaf and dumb. ..."
"... There was no coup attempt, as correctly stated by Tyler Durden : "Trump has never had the concentration, organizational acumen, or ideological coherence to mount a bona fide "coup," and a mob intrusion which was swiftly dispersed by armed agents of the state doesn't change that. ..."
"... Many Trumpists believed in the QAnon and Kayfabe conspiracies; they posted reports of bad guys being arrested, of servers snatched by the FBI, of Clinton and Biden waiting for rough justice behind bars. This belief disarmed people who would otherwise have fought to achieve this very result. That is the problem with conspiracies: imaginary conspiracies prevent real action. ..."
"... He succeeded against enormous odds in improving the lot of American workers: for the first time since the 1970s, their incomes rose in relation to the other classes. He stopped mass migration to the US: legal immigration went down to a trickle. He avoided new wars; he tried to make peace with Russia. He refused to bomb Iran even in the last days of his presidency, though some pro-Israel supporters promised him a second term if he would. ..."
"... His fight against the corona madness was his great achievement. He was against the lockdowns that are about to destroy our world so completely that few things will survive. The last great US ruler who didn't wear the cowardly mask will be remembered. He could not defeat the mighty medical complex, or FAGMA, or the Masters of Discourse, but he tried. ..."
President Trump was decisively beaten, if not fair and square. The hopes of millions of
American voters were squashed and extinguished. The saga of the Orange Man is over. The victors
used a gambit: they sacrificed the sanctity and security of the Capitol, allowed intruders in,
permitted them to take selfies in the Speaker's office, and then faked horror and outrage. The
attempted calls for electoral transparency were deflated in real time as huge crowds were
dispersed, electors were confirmed, and the ascendancy of Biden was assured, while Trump
followers were branded 'domestic terrorists'.
Donald Trump denounced the people whom he personally called to protest. His close political
allies withdrew their support. Within hours, or even minutes, this ruler of the world admired
by millions became a non-person. Like a boy who posted an obscenity, he was banned by Twitter
and Facebook. Time will tell whether he will go to prison, as so many Dems pray for, but his
political life seems to have ended, even if his cause may live.
The deck was stacked against President Trump from Day One. His orders were ignored. The US
courts, judges, police, the whole system of law enforcement was against him; his orders were
blocked or overturned, while the media made fun of him and the opposition relentlessly
delegitimised him. He was blocked even by Fox News. Dem-run states adjusted their laws to
assure the elections' result. Trump was a lame duck from the very beginning of his presidency
to its bitter end. He was kept on a short leash by the almighty Deep State, and when he tried
to free himself, they pulled the leash.
On January 6, a massive demonstration in his support gathered in Washington, DC. Hundreds of
thousands Americans came to the capital to demand justice after the election fraud became
obvious. They hoped that the Republican representatives would refuse to certify the fraud and
appoint a commission to check and recount the votes. Some of the protesters managed to break
into the Capitol, or were let in by the police. This peaceful Occupy Capitol action, the
exercise of a natural right to protest, was met with lethal fire, and a young female protester
from San Diego, Ashli Babbitt, was murdered by the plainclothes police. The Republican
representatives were cowed and surrendered; Biden was confirmed to take office.
The horror and outrage of the Dem politicians and media were as faked as their news. During
last year, many government buildings were taken over by Dem-sponsored BLM activists, and in not
one case did the police use lethal weapons or even rush the protesters out of buildings.
"Shortly after 8 p.m. Wednesday, hundreds of protesters gathered outside the locked King
Street entrance to the Capitol, chanting "Break down the door!" and "General strike!" Moments
later, police ceded control of the State Street doors and allowed the crowd to surge inside,
joining thousands who had already gathered in the Capitol to protest the votes. The area
outside the Assembly, which is scheduled to take the bill up at 11 a.m. today, was crowded
with protesters who chanted, "We're not leaving. Not this time."
Department of Administration spokesman Tim Donovan said although protesters were being
encouraged to leave, no one would be forcibly removed. Mayor Dave Cieslewicz said he had
instructed Police Chief Noble Wray not to allow his officers to participate in removing
demonstrators from the building."
This was what happened in Madison, Wisconsin in March 2011, as
Steve Sailer reminded us. Indeed, this is what the protesters expected; some were dressed
in flamboyant carnival attire; they behaved well and peacefully, within acceptable limits. It
was not an insurrection; they didn't try to take over the Congress in any meaningful sense.
For them, it was an honest and funny way to express their indignation. But the real gambit
plotters intended to frame them. They even murdered four protesters hoping they would respond
with violence, but in vain.
White American protesters are exceptionally non-violent lot; as with Occupy Wall Street
a few years back the January 6 Capitol protesters were timid and obedient as lambs. For this
reason, BLM was invented, for Blacks are able to riot violently, as opposed to well-trained
whites. It is not a race thing: lily-white French Yellow Vests and Ukrainian nationalists have
fought the police all right. But US whites are not prone to riot, not since the Civil War.
Being a foreigner, I do not understand why the Americans want to keep their guns if they never
use them, but that's the way they are.
Anyway, their non-violence didn't help them. The president-elect
Biden begrudged them even the name of protesters: "Don't dare call them protesters. They
were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists." Indeed, the name should be
preserved for Deep State-authorised looters and their brethren all over the world, whether in
Hong Kong or Minsk, in Seattle or Portland.
Russian social networks were comparing the Washington DC events with those nearer to home
and complained of 'double standards'. The US media expressed no indignation when their
appointee Boris Yeltsin shelled the Russian Parliament in 1993. The New York Times and
the State Department had encouraged the nationalist mob to storm Ukrainian government offices
in 2014. They cheered on the opposition in Minsk in taking over their parliament after failing
to win elections. The Belarus protesters claimed their country's election results were rigged,
just like Trump supporters did for the US elections, but Biden didn't call them "domestic
terrorists". (Actually, neither did President Lukashenko: he called them 'protesters', and
their violent demos were dispersed without a single shot fired.) In such cases, Jews respond
with "How can you compare?!"
The Russians compared the Capitol 'coup attempt' with their own semi-staged 'coup' of 1991,
a partly pre-planned provocation. In 1991, the feeble coup organisers could not detain Yeltsin
and surrendered as if on cue; the wave of indignation removed Gorbachev and the Communist party
from power. In the Capitol, too, police waved the 'invaders' in, as you can see on this video
forwarded by the BBC. More videos suggesting Capitol police involvement in the ostensible
provocation are presented
here . The orchestrated indignation allowed the victors to censor and purge the defeated
Trump and his followers. Just as the USSR went down in August 1991, Trump's America went down
in January 2021, and the liberal elites representing the big corporations came to power. It was
achieved by a provocation, but ordinary Trump followers were really angry with the Election
Steal. Likewise, 1991 was a provocation, but ordinary Russian citizens were angry at
Gorbachev's perestroika, while the liberal elites used it to dismantle the Soviet state and
transfer all assets to their oligarchs.
People with a good knowledge of history refer to the Reichstag Fire of February 1933, the
arson contrived by the newly formed Nazi government itself to turn public opinion against its
opponents and to assume emergency powers. Alternatively, other researchers have contended that
there was no proof of Nazi complicity in the crime, but that Hitler merely capitalised on the
Dutch Communist van der Lubbe's independent act. The fire is the subject of continued debate
and research, says
the Encycopaedia Britannica . Probably the same will be said about the Capitol "invasion",
and researchers will argue whether duplicitous Biden's minions organised it or just
capitalised on the Trumpers' sincere protest.
There is no doubt that to an objective observer the 2020 elections were profoundly
unfair. I won't trouble you with too many published details about the statistically impossible
results, but here is one example of fraud. The city of Detroit gave 95 per cent of its vote to
Biden/Kamala, a number that Mr Kim Jong-un would view with slight envy, while Mr Lukashenko
would murmur, "How can it be done?" It is highly likely this mind-boggling result was achieved
in the following way.
Detroit Dems outsourced ballot
harvesting to local drug lords, offering them as a prize – recreational marijuana
business licenses. These licences are the best thing sincea licence to print
money . Having such licenses is like having your own ATM. Here
you can read about their profitability and the lengths criminals will go to obtain them.
Detroit Dems had
changed local laws allowing the sale of marijuana in their fine city (it was forbidden
until November 2020). They changed local laws prescribing the
issuing of marijuana licences to drug dealers with previous convictions for drug dealing.
They let drug lords out of
jail . They changed local laws to allow ballot harvesting; that is, collecting postal votes
and assisting with the filling in of ballots. After that, the drug dealers went around
collecting postal ballots and filling them in immediately, if they were conscientious, or just
filling them in at their leisure, if feeling lazy. They had a judge at their disposal,
Cynthia Stephens , who
single-handedly
changed Michigan election laws, and then
rejected Trump's claims of fraud.
Yes, Virginia, there was election fraud in many American states. They are used to
gambling; they aren't surprised by a beautiful hand of four aces, as Mark Twain suggested.
Usually the two parties deal in turns, and cheat in turns. Only this time, Trump convinced many
people that it is different; that this is their last chance.
The problem is, Trump was a poor organiser. He could win elections, if he could prevent
Cynthia Stephens's kind of legislation, outlaw postal ballots, enforce obligatory IDs for
voting, mobilise his people for election control. A formidable task, but not impossible, while
dealing with a prone-to-cheat adversary. He could even do a revolution on January 6, tasking
the right people to act, forming a revolutionary HQ, planning a strategy of takeover, but he
didn't do anything of the sort. He probably thought Congress would see the vast crowds and
allow for the checking of election results.
Alternatively, he was so naïve that he believed revolutions just happen by
themselves, as in the movies. They do not. Behind every successful revolution, there is a lot
of planning, armed force, weapons ready for use, supply lines, logistics, media support, and
communications. Trump had none of that. It was enough to turn off Twitter to make him deaf and
dumb.
There was no coup attempt, as correctly stated by Tyler
Durden : "Trump has never had the concentration, organizational acumen, or ideological
coherence to mount a bona fide "coup," and a mob intrusion which was swiftly dispersed
by armed agents of the state doesn't change that. Shortly after the breach, he released a
video instructing his followers not to take Senators hostage or imprison Mike Pence, but to "go
home." No factions of the federal government joined the mob on Trump's orders, because he
didn't bother issuing any. The whole episode never stood the remotest chance of preventing the
certification of Joe Biden, much less overthrowing the government. It was just another goofball
charade, and in that sense, a fitting end to the Trump presidency."
Conspiracy theories played their disappointing part in the debacle. Many Trumpists
believed in the QAnon and Kayfabe conspiracies; they posted reports of bad guys being arrested,
of servers snatched by the FBI, of Clinton and Biden waiting for rough justice behind bars.
This belief disarmed people who would otherwise have fought to achieve this very result. That
is the problem with conspiracies: imaginary conspiracies prevent real action.
Still, I do not want to finish this piece on such a sad and disappointing note. President
Trump was a great leader. He succeeded against enormous odds in improving the lot of
American workers: for the first time since the 1970s, their incomes rose in relation to the
other classes. He stopped mass migration to the US: legal immigration went down to a trickle.
He avoided new wars; he tried to make peace with Russia. He refused to bomb Iran even in the
last days of his presidency, though some pro-Israel supporters promised
him a second term if he would.
His fight against the corona madness was his great achievement. He was against the
lockdowns that are about to destroy our world so completely that few things will survive. The
last great US ruler who didn't wear the cowardly mask will be remembered. He could not defeat
the mighty medical complex, or FAGMA, or the Masters of Discourse, but he tried.
The day of his defeat, January 6, was the Epiphany, or Adoration of the Magi, of the Three
Wise Men who came to worship Jesus in his cave. It was also Christmas Eve for the Eastern
Church. It is the darkest time of the year; from now on, the day will increase and so will our
hopes.
Anyone can see the
footage . Ashli Babbitt was a young woman at Wednesday's protests. She had no weapon, not
even a stick. There were armed police in front of her and behind her. She posed no danger to
anyone. Still, a police officer, apparently black, shot and killed her.
I never thought I'd say this, but Shaun King is right.
Joe Biden, allegedly quoting his granddaughter,
said of Wednesday's protests:
No one can tell me if it had been a group of Black Lives Matter protesting yesterday, they
wouldn't have been treated very, very differently than the mob of thugs that stormed the
Capitol. We all know that's true. And it is unacceptable. Totally unacceptable.
That's true. And it is totally unacceptable.
If BLM took over the Capitol, once the mob went home, congressmen would kneel in submission.
Journalists would praise the takeover. Corporations would give billions.
It's already happened. Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, festooned in kente cloth,
knelt for George Floyd. The Capitol Police knelt
too. Washington D.C. symbolically renamed
16th Street Black Lives Matter Plaza. New York City painted a huge Black Lives Matter sign on
the street just outside Trump Tower.
And we're supposed to think BLM got harsh treatment? In what must have been millions
of man-hours of rioting, how many people did police kill? Not one. Did they shoot outright
looters or arsonists? Only with rubber bullets, and only a handful. So far as I can tell,
police did not even open fire and wound a single BLMer -- not one -- even in the 300 cities
with such bad rioting there had to be curfews.
In Minneapolis, the mob
burned down an entire precinct station. In Seattle, anarchists set up an " autonomous
zone " that police broke up only after paramilitaries shot two black teenagers. Rioters
destroyed an incalculable amount of property. That wasn't just "stuff." Behind countless looted
stores were small business owners and their employees. If the lockdowns didn't put them on the
breadline, BLM did.
Homicides are rising in
Chicago ,
Los Angeles , Jackson ,
Philadelphia , and many other major cities. There are several reasons why, but one is
undoubtedly the " Ferguson
Effect " on a mass scale. Police don't think doing their jobs is worth the risk.
Policing blacks is dangerous. They hate cops. It's better to lie low and wait till you get
a pension or just
quit .
From what I can tell, journalists and the black "community" don't care about crime and
disorder, even though blacks suffer from it the most. Journalists, activists, and politicians
have defended violent protests and property destruction. The media cheered while mobs tore down
monuments to our greatest heroes, including,
George Washington ,
Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt , Robert
E. Lee, and Stonewall Jackson . Not even the dead
can rest in peace -- not white men, anyway. Hapless conservatives
think it's about the "Confederacy." When even Lincoln is no longer safe, it's clearly about
race.
So spare me the outrage from Tom Daschle ,
Dick Durbin ,
Andy Kim , Joe Scarborough , and
others who lecture us about "sacrilege" and "desecration" because Americans trespassed in
the Capitol. I'm far more offended at what's been done to the memory of Washington.
Police are offering up to $1,000
if you help them catch anyone who "desecrated" the Capital. Were there any rewards offered for
turning in BLM arsonists? Or for the people who laid siege night after
night to the federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon, setting fires, trying to blind
officers with green lasers, and trying to kill them with commercial-grade fireworks? These are
serious felonies. The people who "desecrated" the Capitol were trespassers.
One rabbi
tells us "we lost something sacred" when the Capitol was "defiled," comparing it to the
fall of the Jewish Temple. After months spent watching our cowardly leaders do nothing while
our cities, history, and heroes were ransacked, I think a better parallel may be Jesus Christ
driving out the moneychangers. Where have all the respectable people been, now that they're
suddenly worried about national honor, civil debate, and the rule of law?
In 2017, a "Bernie Bro" opened
fire on Republican congressmen, badly wounding Steve Scalise. Jesse Benn and Tariq Nasheed,
both Twitter bluechecks, had this to say:
When the George Floyd protests began,
Chris Cuomo told his audience:
Now too many see the protests as the problem. No, the problem is what forced your fellow
citizens to take to the streets: persistent, poisonous inequities and injustice. And please,
show me where it says protesters are supposed to be polite and peaceful. Because I can show
you that outraged citizens are what made the country what she is and led to any major
milestone.
That same month, the Democrats House caucus
blocked a GOP resolution
that "condemn[ed] violence and rioting" but also mourned the "tragic death of George
Floyd."
Trevor Noah, quoting Martin Luther King, Jr., said riots are the language of the unheard. He
dismissed claims that involving children or "burning" is wrong. "There is no right way to
protest because that's what protest is," he
said . "It cannot be right because you are protesting against a thing that is stopping
you."
Still, let's look beyond media hypocrisy. We're used to that. What about actual violence?
Joe Biden said BLM protesters would have been handled differently. Really? Let's consider the
cults that have grown out of BLM: George Floyd, Jacob Blake, Breonna Taylor. "Say his name!" is
a theological command. However, in each case, facts demolish the myth.
George
Floyd , a career criminal whose violence against women is far worse than anything Harvey
Weinstein did, died while lying to police and resisting arrest. He overdosed. Police came for
Jacob Blake because of a domestic violence complaint (BLM trumps #MeToo). He ignored police
commands and
grabbed a knife . Police shot him, and prosecutors found no reason to charge them.
Breonna
Taylor , arguably the most sensational case, turns out to have been deeply involved in
her boyfriend's drug operation. Her boyfriend opened fire before the police shot back.
Just imagine video footage of a white man shooting an unarmed black woman who was clearly no
threat. It would be the biggest story in the country. It would be the biggest story in the
world. Cities would erupt.
With Ashli Babbitt, we don't need to imagine. We can watch.
Here is a final exchange between her and a friend:
An officer shot her as she tried to climb through a door. The video shows there were armed
police on her side of the door. An officer in front of her had plenty of time to
evaluate the situation, take aim, and kill her with a single shot.
Exterminated? Well, it's just one deleted tweet from a fringe account. Maybe we shouldn't
care.
The political director for ABC News, Rick Klein,
tweeted that though President Trump will soon be gone, that's the easy part. "Cleansing the
movement he commands is going to be something else," he said. Leftists like to complain
about "
eliminationist rhetoric ." Does this count, or is it just "fighting hate?"
Keep in mind, Joe Biden said
the protesters were "domestic terrorists." USA Today has called on readers to doxx everyone
there.
Will Republicans try to understand what motivated the protesters or speak for Ashli Babbitt?
Rep. Markwayne Mullin, a Republican from Oklahoma,
said the officer "didn't have a choice at the time." Senator Lindsey Graham wants a "
Joint
Task Force " to identify every person "who breached the security of the Capitol." Senator
Ted Cruz called the demonstrators
"terrorists."
If our leaders think trespassing justifies lethal force, we would have no problem with
illegal immigration
.
Political power in America is media power . It's the
power to shape consciousness. Violence works when you have media power. It fails when you don't.
The protest Wednesday was an example of " hyperreality
." There was no attempted coup by President Trump, nor by people wandering around the Capitol.
The media created a story about an "armed insurrection," a putsch , and they seem to believe it.
Ashli Babbitt was also caught in a fantasy. The " QAnon" story told her
President Trump was fighting a cosmic struggle against evil. She joined in that struggle.
Unfortunately, as in The Matrix , if you die in the simulation, you die in real life. In
his concession speech last night, President Trump didn't mention her. He wouldn't say her
name.
If anything, QAnon is an opiate because it tells Americans the system still somehow works.
It tells well-meaning, naïve people that their country still exists, the old values
endure, the Founders' vision lives on, and everything will turn out fine. That illusion died
with Ashli Babbitt.
Our rulers apparently believe what they are saying. They think they're fighting a dictator,
that Ashli Babbitt and people like her deserve to die, and that there must be a cleansing
before the egalitarian paradise arrives. We know what happens when fanatics stop at nothing in
the name of equality.
People can try to live in a dream, but reality finally breaks in. For decades, President
Donald Trump crafted his media image as a businessman, patriot, and strategist. He may believe
himself to be a Great Man. Tens of millions of Americans who saw their country being stolen
from them put their trust in him. He let them down -- not because he is an aspiring dictator,
but because he is erratic, self-absorbed, and doesn't truly understand what is happening to the
country.
Ahsli's surname is the same as Sinclair Lewis's title character in Babbitt , about a
middle-class guy who seeks meaning in a conformist world. Babbitt rebels against middle-class
values. Today, those values seem idyllic. Today, it is rebellion to uphold natural values of
morality, family, and patriotism.
Perhaps Ashli Babbitt died for a false idol, a leader who didn't deserve her loyalty.
Perhaps I'm too hard on President Trump, who has been continuously betrayed and sabotaged.
Either way, Ashli Babbitt's sacrifice was not pointless. Whatever her mistakes, she was
right to believe her country is ruled by a hostile elite. The form her rebellion took
was wrong, but she died for her beliefs. Especially in a time when our rulers make saints out
of thugs, we should remember Ashli Babbitt, who served a country that killed her.
President Trump can't save you
. It was a dream to think he ever could. It's hard to cast off fantasy, but we have no choice.
There's just us.
However, you are not alone. You are part of something greater than yourself, something that
goes back to the beginning of time. There's no alternative but to accept your duty , face what's coming,
remember the fallen, and have faith in victory.
Gregory Hood: "Perhaps Ashli Babbitt died for a false idol, a leader who didn't deserve
her loyalty. "
Perhaps? LOL. That coward couldn't even acknowledge her death.
I have to wonder if she was influenced by the widespread Trump idolatry of the alt-right.
People like Andrew Anglin, Kevin MacDonald, and blogger Paul Kersey, to name only a few, may
have her blood on their hands.
Biden never have agenda other then to depose Trump. Neither in regard to China, no in regard to Russia, no in regard to Israel (Like
Trump he claims that he is Zionists).
Trump reverted some USA foreign policies in regard to China. But in general he ruled like Bush II with Pompeo as his Cheney.
And Trumpism without Trump is much more dangerous to neoliberal Dems.
Starting from 48 min he provides interesting analysis of the US network hamsters
(he calls them drone class)
Notable quotes:
"... We are feeling like we are living in a Banana Republic. The dems, the media, academia, Hollywood....all in cahoots to take power back, even if they have to lie, cheat and steal. ..."
"... They get away with it because they call those of us who question anything they do as "conspiracy theorists". They have already called for lists of Trump supporters. Scary here if you aren't on the "right side" and say the "approved" things. ..."
"... Joe Francis: The corruption throughout this election was extremely obvious in many ways, & in my opinion a necessary evil that needs to be dealt with properly. It should be well known our elections have been phony for many years. ..."
"... Who has control of the U.S. Congress? Answer: "Corporate" politicians, Financiers, & Bankers. ..."
"... "Wanted someone a little less controversial." Biden, a demented, corrupt swamp creature is a little less controversial, hah, that's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. ..."
"... "90% turnout across democrat big cities" across multiple swing states, all stopped counting at the same time, multiple occasions of blocking observance of the vote? ..."
"... Sending mail-in ballots to everybody was election rigging in the first place. Densely populated urban areas are easy to vote harvest, rural areas are not. ..."
"... I believe Mr Hanson expresses the feelings of the majority of Americans. I, and the vast majority of those I meet are especially aggravated by the big tech companies and their control of the narrative, and their censorship. People are very frustrated and angry. It feels like Big Brother is real, and we're getting fed 'double speak' by the mainstream media. Thanks for your program. Beat wishes to you. ..."
We are feeling like we are living in a Banana Republic. The dems, the media, academia, Hollywood....all in cahoots to take
power back, even if they have to lie, cheat and steal.
They get away with it because they call those of us who question anything
they do as "conspiracy theorists". They have already called for lists of Trump supporters. Scary here if you aren't on the "right
side" and say the "approved" things.
Joe Francis: The corruption throughout this election was extremely obvious in many ways, & in my opinion a necessary evil that
needs to be dealt with properly. It should be well known our elections have been phony for many years.
We cure that problem now,
so that future elections will be on a more level playing field. I'm not distressed, I'm in the understanding that we'll shine
the light of truth on the corrupt ones, & the great division has made our ability to see who's who, so much easier to know. I
will continue in good thoughts, & I am confident that our future will continue to be brighter. Peace to you.
It breaks my heart for Trump and Americans who voted in huge numbers, for him. We fought for four years to get Brexit, and
it's still not delivered. Corrupt Bastards everywhere! God help us all!! Trump 2020.
"Wanted someone a little less controversial." Biden, a demented, corrupt swamp creature is a little less controversial, hah,
that's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.
Smells kinda off IMO "90% turnout across democrat big cities" across multiple swing states, all stopped counting at the same
time, multiple occasions of blocking observance of the vote?
Sending mail-in ballots to everybody was election rigging in the first place. Densely populated urban areas are easy to vote
harvest, rural areas are not.
The outrageous turn out is just neighbors and "activists" forcing their neighbors to fill in the
ballots and hand them (lazy people would just hand them blank), on the threat of "you aren't voting Trump, are you?". Even 1%
of people doing this and getting a few extra ballots each is easily enough to swing the battleground states.
Anyone else think this guy is Brilliant, WOW he seems to really have this situation in a crystal clear vision of what is and
has been going on, he knows exactly what the Democrats are and have been planning for years, Trump has the Balls to make things
happen and Biden doesn't, People don't like Trump because he's Arrogant and Brilliant and makes his own decisions and takes Action,
And Biden is just a Yes man, and is not capable of making his own decisions let alone following through on anything he may promise
to change or improve for future generations, really sad😭 Just wondering Did the Democrats pay all the people in prison to fill
out ballots and vote for Biden, is that where all the extra votes came from???
What a mind blowing articulate profound interview! That analogy at around 37 mins, of the rough decent gunslinger cleaning
up the cattle baron / stand over merchant type and then the 'conmon folk' wanting him to leave... that gave me shivers. Every
decent policeman/ serviceman/defender of the weak knows exactly what thats about. The weak fear the bullies but they also fear
the decent tough guy who has the guts to stand up to them. Soldiers are extremely popular during wartime but are shunned during
peacetime. People are so happy to see the police when they are being threatened but so glad to not see them otherwise. President
Trump is such a man but his job isn't finished. The Cattle Baron is attempting to run him off, aided by his minions/ cronies/ stooges.
Time for the townsfolk to take his example and stand up for their own folks. Yeehaaa!
I believe Mr Hanson expresses the feelings of the majority of Americans. I, and the vast majority of those I meet are especially
aggravated by the big tech companies and their control of the narrative, and their censorship. People are very frustrated and
angry. It feels like Big Brother is real, and we're getting fed 'double speak' by the mainstream media. Thanks for your program.
Beat wishes to you.
This was an excellent interview, and for the most part, I feel that he hit the nail on the head; however, I am not going to
believe the statement that Trump is not going to be president. Well over more than half of the citizens in this country voted
for him. This is not going to go away. We will see President Trump re-elected. The Sleeping Giant has woken up!
ZH commenters overwhelmingly think that this was a false flag. Was it pre-planned with paid
provocators insiting the crowd, or on the spot decision to user rioters to Neoliberal Dems
advantage and to crush Trump is unclear. What is clear is cue bono part of this event.
On Wednesday, a mob apparently composed of Trump supporters forced its way past US Capitol
security guards and briefly moved unrestrained through much of the capitol building. They
displayed virtually no organization and no clear goals.
Five people reportedly died during the events - one apparently unarmed female protester died
of a gunshot wound, three other protesters "suffered medical emergencies" that resulted in
their deaths (one crushed, one heart attack, and one stroke); and a police officer died from a
blood clot on his brain reportedly triggered while physically engaging with protesters.
[ZH: Here is one 'terrifying scene' from the clashes as 'rioters' began their 'coup']...
Yet, the media response has been to act as if the event constituted a coup d'etat. This was
" A Very
American Coup " according to a headline at The New Republic . " This
is a Coup " insists a writer at Foreign Policy. The Atlantic presented photos purported to
be "
Scenes From an American Coup ."
But this wasn't a coup, and what happened on Wednesday is conceptually very different from a
coup. Coups nearly always are acts committed by elites against the sitting executive power
using the tools of the elites. This isn't at all what happened on Wednesday.
What Is a
Coup?
A gang of disorganized, powerless mechanics, janitors, and insurance agents running through
the capitol isn't a coup. And if it was a coup attempt, it was so far from anything that might
hope to succeed as a coup that it should not be taken seriously as such.
A coup attempt includes illegal and overt attempts by the military or other elites within
the state apparatus to unseat the sitting executive.
There are two key components of this definition. The first is that it is illegal. Powell and
Thyne note this "illegal" qualifier is important to include "because it differentiates coups
from political pressure, which is common whenever people have freedom to organize."
In other words, protests, or threats of protest don't count as coups. Neither do legal
efforts such as a vote of no confidence or an impeachment.
But an even more critical aspect of Powell's and Thyne's definition is that it requires the
involvement of elites.
This can be seen in any stereotypical example of a coup d'etat. This generally involves a
renegade military detachment, military officers, and others from within the state apparatus who
can employ knowledge, skills, influence, coercive tools gained through membership in the
regime's elite circles.
The attempted coup in Japan in 1937, for example, was carried out by more than 1,500
officers and men of the Japanese imperial army. They nonetheless failed, likely because they
miscalculated the amount of support they enjoyed among other officers. More recently, in the
2009 Honduran coup, the bulk of the Honduran Army turned on the president Manuel Zelaya and
sent him into exile. That was a successful coup. More famously, Chile's 1973 coup was
successfully led by Agusto Pinochet, the commander-in-chief of the Army, and this enabled him
to shell the Chilean executive palace with military hardware.
Contrast this with nameless MAGA-hat-wearing flag wavers, and the inappropriateness of the
term "coup" in this case should be blatantly obvious. With real coups, power is seized by a
faction of the elite which has the ability to take control of the machinery of state
indefinitely. Although some of Trump's critics claim he was somehow responsible for Wednesday's
mob, it is clear that Trump was not coordinating or directing any sort of military operation
through Twitter posts. There was no plan for holding power. Had those who invaded the capitol
building managed to take control of the building for a time, there's no reason to think this
would somehow translate into control of the state. How would it? The real coercive power
remained well ensconced within an apparently undivided military apparatus.
Moreover, it has been clear for years that the permanent technocracy which controls the
day-to-day execution of federal administrative power (i.e., "the deep state") has long been
committed to undermining the Trump administration -- from high
ranking FBI agents , to military diplomats , to Pentagon
officials . From where would Trump draw the necessary cooperation from elites to overturn
more than 200 years of established norms in transfers of presidential power? In any case, the
Biden administration is likely to be better for the state's elites than the Trump
administration. There is no reason for any group of them to contemplate a coup against
Biden.
Thus, if any of Wednesday's capital rioters thought they were about to bring about a coup by
smashing some windows in the capitol, they were engaging in thoroughly amateurish thinking.
It's unlikely, however, that more than a few of the rioters thought there was a coup d'etat
afoot. It's more likely most of them simply wanted to dramatically display their displeasure
with the federal regime and to signal they weren't going to placidly submit to whatever the
American bureaucracy decided to dish out.
Nonetheless, we should not be surprised that the media has rushed to apply the term to the
riot. This phenomenon was examined in a November 2019 article titled " Coup with Adjectives: Conceptual
Stretching or Innovation in Comparative Research? ," by Leiv Marsteintredet and Andres
Malamud. The authors note that as the incidence of real coups has declined, the word has become
more common, but with modifiers attached.
Examples of these modifiers include "soft," "constitutional," "parliamentary," and
"slow-motion." Numerous critics of the impeachment of Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, for example,
repeatedly called it a "soft coup." The authors note this is no mere issue of splitting hairs,
explaining that "The choice of how to conceptualize a coup is not to be taken lightly since it
carries normative, analytical, and political implications."
Increasingly, the term really means "this is a thing I don't like." But the term's use
paints the non-coup participants as criminals poised to seize power illegally. By applying this
term to the acts of a disorganized group of Trump supporters with no base of support among
state elites, the pundits know exactly what they're doing. 34,099 141 NEV
Cardinal Fang 9 hours ago
It was a glorified flash mob
RedDog1 8 hours ago
In the not too distant past...leftist mobs were glorified by the press/Democrat
politicians for occupying Senate offices, attempting to occupy SCOTUS/White House and
assaulting RNC nomination guest leaving the White House.
Instead of a coup, this weeks events are a Riechstag 2.0 that's being used to coverup a
phony election and strip social media access from Democrats rivals.
The First Rule 3 hours ago
When Antifa/BLM/SJW's Burn, Loot, Destroy, even Murder, the MSM calls it "Peaceful
Protests".
When Conservatives walk on Federal Property, after being motioned in by DC Police, its
"Terrorism".
This is Orwellian Beyond Belief.
Banned Banana 5 hours ago
Indeed, my the crack journalists at my local paper cunningly uncovered this dangerous
rebel, who apparently worked at a bulk mail company when he wasn't playing the game of
thrones. Now he's been fired for having an opinion:
Social media came for Alex Jones Social media came for Donald Trump now they will come for
you https://youtu.be/osgoT22i2ts
not dead yet 2 hours ago remove link
Like Covid the Dems are using this to their advantage. By screaming armed rioters
attempting a coup instigated by Trump who should be removed by impeachment or the 25th it's
giving the Dems weeks of cover to enact the biggest fokking in history. The kind of crap they
are going to pull won't surprise any of us but will be a huge surprise to the Dem faithful
and the media so they need to be distracted. There is no time to impeach or overthrow with
the 25th and they know that but it's fodder for the faithful.
With the black racist bigot and China boy cementing the Senate for Bidenhoe they are going
to start implementing their destruction of America as we know it policies as soon as Joe's
hand comes off the bible. This effort will be in parallel to the destruction of Trumps legacy
and undoing everything he did. Not everything. Wall Street and the rich didn't back Biden on
a whim. Under Trumps tax cuts the rich paid MORE in taxes as many of their deductions were
capped. So look for Joe to roll back the cut and restore full deductions and some other
sweeteners so the rich pay less taxes than before Trump. To the sheep Joe will be hailed a
hero for soaking the rich.
Cabreado 9 hours ago (Edited)
If I missed it, I apologize...
but did the author neglect to mention the most recent 4.5-year-long Coup attempt?
Ah... referred to as "undermining."
How grotesquely disingenuous -- said politely.
CommonsDeered 8 hours ago
Russiagate 2.0:
DONT mention Russiagate 1.0. I think I did once but, apart from being banned immediately,
got away with it.
hegger 2 hours ago (Edited)
Having had family members who actually experienced Nazi Germany from the inside, from its
birth to its death in 1945, and having heard their gut-wrenching first-hand accounts, I have
no respect for the impetulant, blubbering children screaming coupe or comparing Trump to
Hitler.
These children have no idea what a dictator actually is. They have no idea what it means
to really live in that kind of terror, being surrounded by institutionalized, highly
efficient non-stop, constant death.
Like the boy who cried 'wolf,' they'll eventually deprive terms of their meaning so that
nobody cares to react to their screaming of "dictator!!!" or "coup!!!" when it really
matters.
I have lost respect for these people.
bigdumbnugly 9 hours ago
it wasn't even a chicken coup.
Oh-Globits 8 hours ago
If it was a coup, there would be 535 nicely decorated lamp posts...one could only wish
skizex 28 minutes ago
Dr. Cynthia McKinney: NATO GLADIO joined CIA, Deep State to Steal Presidential
Election
as a member of the elite Capitol Security Staff, we would like to welcome you to a guided
tour of the building. have a nice day!
Ms No PREMIUM 9 hours ago
They are trying to intimidate what could end up some of the biggest and angriest protests
ever in the US. They false flagged to get ahead of it. They are trying to prevent those
potential protests from exposing the US government as illegitimate. At least one clear
motive...
rastanarchocapitalist 9 hours ago
RIP 1st Amendment
RedDog1 8 hours ago
Some animals are more equal...there's still plenty of 1st Amendment freedom for big tech's
cronies.
Savvy 9 hours ago
They're identifying Trump supporters at Wednesday's rally and having them fired from their
jobs
they are the most vile humans not even worth reasoning with, show them no mercy if one day
they are at the end of a barrel.
honest injun 8 hours ago remove link
It was a false flag. The police opened the gates, waved people into the Capital, and
stayed with them until one of them was shot. People with Antifa tattoos put on hats similar
to MAGA hats (but a different color) then took control of Pelosi's office. The gullible Trump
supporters walked in and put the poles for the rope line that was knocked over by Antifa back
in place. Then the media gives a false narritive and anyone with a different narritive is
silenced.
Obamanism666 3 hours ago (Edited)
Riot when Trumps supporters are angry but Peaceful protests when BLM/Antifa protest.
So How many shops were looted in DC? How many Buildings were burned doewn?
Apart from a few windows broken and doors busted there was no damage.
journey80 37 minutes ago
Windows were busted by antifa actors, with actual protestors trying to stop them. Bicycle
racks, the only "barriers" in the area, were set aside by Capitol police, or people dressed
as Capitol police, who waved in the protestors, who were guided into and through the building
by Capitol police and protestors, or actors dressed as Capitol police and protestors. Who
told the police to stand down and let the protestors onto the Capitol steps, who told them to
allow antifa actors to break a few windows, to climb a wall for the photographers, all
undisturbed? Who OPENED THE DOORS of the Capitol to let in throngs of protestors? Where were
the barriers that surround the Capitol when there is an event of any significance? Where was
the real security that is always there, shoulder to shoulder in combat gear when a protest is
in progress, or even expected?
iCdeadSheeple 8 hours ago
Take the narrative out of the issues at hand. Denying a platform for grievances by
discrediting the source.
Joseph Goebbels
PGR88 5 hours ago remove link
It was the final act of a CIA color revolution
NumbNuts 5 hours ago
It was nothing more than raucous hooliganism, with a Patriotic spirit.
No insurrection. No domestic terrorism.
Xibalba 9 hours ago
It was a coup, by Pelosi
9.0ontherichterscale 7 hours ago (Edited)
demsheviks are getting a lot of mileage out of this flea circus. Whippng up fear in the he
gullible and the stupid.
Southerly Buster 6 hours ago
A flash mob in the Capitol Building; not much else to say except 'vale' to the unfortunate
lady murdered by trigger happy security.
Obamanism666 3 hours ago
False flag to divert the MSM away from how popular Trump is. so 80,000 protested
peacefully but you only see images of the few hundred staged to enter the building.
nocturnal66 22 minutes ago
I am old. But this reminded me of watching the RFK assasination live on TV, Oswald getting
shot too. And 58 years later they are still lying about it but we know the truth. Events like
this never happen unless it's allowed to happen.
bustdriver 24 minutes ago
It's not about truth it's about optics.
Cogito_ergosum 8 hours ago
Are any of you considering the remote possibility that a huge series of staged events are
being rolled out?? JAN 6th peasant uprising was the first! MAGA boomers are being herded into
a series of false flag events and they already got saddam'd / AL Qaeda'd by the Bush
deepstate and they dont even know it....yet!
2021 you will see a year of happenings. The CIA / military is going to stage a fake Qanon
coup attempt to track target and remove all armed forces supporting MAGA / q anon theories.
Trump may become a casualty in that conflict to explain away his death.
Trump is most likely dead or incapacitated. Trump never shows up live to his supporters
after JAN 6th. THE DEAD CANT MAKE IT TO ANY HEARING OR INAGRUATION! Most likely black bagged
and killed in TX airbase. He lost the petrodollar and Iran probably demanded his corpse or
all out nuke war against Israel. His tweets videos are deepfakes!
@Zarathustra
ith his boots on Pelosi's desk was an actor? Oh, my, my, I was laughing my ass off at that
one. That there is funny, I don't care who you is. Hell, that one should even crack up
Pelosi's cracked face. Some of these guys were so RIDICULOUSLY OVER THE TOP, the dude with
the pelt and horns, the obvious Confederate flag waving troll, etc. I did catch an Israeli
flag or two out there btw. Is any one out there investigating for Jewish Supremacist hate
groups or Neo Bolsheviks?
KEEP THE FAITH BROTHERS AND STAY POSITIVE. I think this thing isn't that complicated, even
dum-dums like yours truly and even dumber people KNOW WHAT THE SCORE IS, believe this.
As Oliver Stone's movie JFK point out, numerous safeguards to protect President Kennedy
were omitted due to upper command interference. Same thing appears to have happened on Jan.
6.
"Biden: "No one can tell me that if it had been a group of Black Lives Matter protesting
yesterday, they wouldn't have been treated very, very differently than the mob of thugs that
stormed the Capitol. We all know that's true, and it is unacceptable. Totally unacceptable.""
foxnews
Varney commented today on his show that the US is moving rapidly toward an environment in
which deviant opinions and the expression of such will be punished by ostracism, loss of
employment and ultimately - what?
75 million dissidents voted for Trump. Their party actually grew stronger down ballot, much
stronger. These Smelly dissidents are heavily armed. Gun sales are way up. Ammunition is hard
to come by because of heavy buying.
President Joe and his "consort" think that the attitudes of the Smellies are "totally
unacceptable?"
He should be very careful about condemning the mind set of the Smellies, very careful. The
Dems think that they can extrapolate from the hooligans who broke into the capitol to the
general attitudes of the Smelly Deplorables?
This is just the beginning of cancel culture. Note that Trump has been cancelled by Facebook
& Twitter. Obama's IRS went after conservatives, is another example. This is not just about
the Democrats and their urban managerial class cohorts. The GOP establishment is part &
parcel of this alignment and very much a part of the benefits system. They will be even more
brazen in further accelerating market concentration to the benefit of the oligarchy. The past 4
years were just an aberration in their eyes. They've taken Trump down hard as an example to not
challenge their authority. Using George Bush's maxim - either you're with us or against us -
that's gonna be the attitude.
The next leader who will harness the frustration of the "smellies" will be far more
competent & ruthless and likely an authoritarian. The philosophical principles of the
primacy of the natural rights of citizens and the rule of law of our founding has long been
gone. The oligarchy is firmly in control and will suppress dissent more harshly with a lot of
support from the media-managerial class.
The oligarchy will do their very best to prevent the organization of the "Smellies" into a
potent national force. If any small group act out they will be treated harshly. Since the
"Smellies" cannot use the ballot box to push back, how do you think they will organize and
counter the oligarchic forces who have all levers of power and have demonstrated naked exercise
of it?
The Democrats were desperate to shut down the congressional objections to the Electoral
College votes. Once various U.S. senators expressed their objections -- battleground state by
battleground state -- the truth about the brazenly stolen election was televised for the first
time since the steal occurred. Deep State would not permit the evidence to be disseminated like
this -- way too damning! The official record of the Joint Session of Congress on Jan. 6 would
forever contain conclusive evidence of the stolen 2020 POTUS election.
So, they staged a dramatic swarming of The Capitol Building (TCB) in order to DISTRACT
everyone's attention. This black operation was led by AntiFa anarchists disguised as Trump
supporters. That's why the security at TCB was so lax -- to permit the storming of the
building so that Trumpsters would look bad. It's true that there were many MAGA protesters
among those who entered TCB, but they were there to STOP THE STEAL. Given the "soft coup by
stolen ballot" that was being rubber-stamped by the U.S. Congress, the MAGA protesters have
every right to shut down the unlawful, treasonous process.
The Democrats (and Deep State) had to do something quite scary in order to compel the
Congressional Republicans to abandon their fight to decertify the Electoral College votes. What
better way that to orchestrate a fake takeover of The Capitol Building. They even choreographed
a number of photo-ops in Pelosi's office (see this photo ) and the well of the U.S. Senate chambers (see
this photo ). Once these
'shocking' photographs make their way around the Congress, inside the Beltway and the Internet,
the Left will use them as a false justification to crack down on the Right as never
before.
The bottom line here is that the storming of TCB was a meticulously engineered false flag
black operation overseen by the U.S. Intelligence Community to include the FBI, CIA, Capitol
Police, etc. Which is precisely why the protestors faced virtually no resistance from law
enforcement as they breached what little security was quite intentionally set up. In fact, the
whole thing was an obvious set-up with several aims and purposes, some of which will become
clear in the coming days. In a phrase, this globalist-manufactured false flag event will be
used as the "Reichstag fire" was used by Hitler to consolidate his power right after he was
sworn in as Chancellor of Germany in 1933. Biden was essentially installed as the Fuhrer of the
Fourth Reich.
Sound familiar?!
-- Intelligence Analyst & Former U.S Military Officer
Considering the amount of anger that the Capitol invasion provoked, it's no surprise that
USA Today's call was answered by many people. Some readily provided names and other details
about the rioters, while others pointed to people they suspected of being involved.
#1 is a guy named Mike Hunt#2 is a guy in know from high school. Peter Gosinya.#3 is
Jack Mehoff.#4 is Dick Fitzwell#5 is a gay man named Peter O'Stool.#6 is Heywood Jablomie.
#7 is Harry AnissI'll keep working on the list. Hope this helps.
Quite a few of the tips were just links to reports by other major media outlets, while
some replies seemed to gloat about the repercussions that the Trump supporters will now
presumably face.
Others came up with suggestions how one could identify the suspects – that is if
they had privileged access to protected information like hotel reservations.
A handful of commenters seemed really troubled by USA Today's inquiry. "Since when do
journalists conduct police work?" one wondered. Another said it showed the "merger
between press and state" in the US.
Plenty questioned why the newspaper was so eager to learn the identities of the people who
broke into the Capitol building, as they point out, it's hardly the only property damaged
during mass protests lately.
And some tips will probably not help any investigation, since they focused on individuals
that are long dead and only appeared in images picked by USA Today courtesy of their historic
significance.
Richland Yabitches" 1 day ago 8 Jan, 2021 04:06 AM
Thanks for the Heads up USA Today, but the World has already Identified Antifa BLM
Leadership and Sponsorships since 2014, talk about 'Late for Lunch"
TAKEMYKNEE 1 day ago 8 Jan, 2021 09:12 AM
How did they get in there so easily and then security pose by a broken window with their
guns drawn and one woman gets shot, The security allowed them in, this place is supposed to
be the seat of power and authority and this happens, not without a certain amount of
collusion by officials within the building and grounds security staff.
Brusselcat TAKEMYKNEE 22 hours ago 8 Jan, 2021 04:18 PM
DC Police Waving People Towards Yesterday's Riots (YouTube) Timed perfectly to halt
presentation of vote fraud evidence from entering the senate record. Hired professional
rioters from Antifa to lead the charge.
tolof14875 1 day ago 8 Jan, 2021 04:30 AM
Feels very good to see that the democracy USA supported in other countries is making a huge
come back.
RonThePatriot tolof14875 1 day ago 8 Jan, 2021 09:49 AM
I am afraid to say that with a Biden (Obama, Clinton, Bush, Kerry) presidency, you will see
a full blown war in the middle east or God knows where they pick......the warmongers and
war -profiteers need to fill their coffers and their thirst for blood. Biden is their man.
Buster907 1 day ago 8 Jan, 2021 04:12 AM
It's about time the people of BRA (Banana Republic Of America) stood up against the
corrupted system were the rich gets richer, and the poor get poorer.
By
Ciara
O'Rourke
January 7, 2021
No, the storming of the Capitol wasn't a false flag
IF YOUR TIME IS SHORT
There's no evidence to support baseless claims that what happened at the U.S.
Capitol on Jan. 6 was staged, a psychological operation or a "false flag."
A mob of President Donald Trump's supporters stormed the Capitol after he
delivered a speech in which he insisted he won the election, repeated falsehoods about the election, and urged the
crowd to march to Congress.
Supporters of President Donald Trump
stormed
and occupied the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6
. As the mob could be heard shouting outside the doors of the Senate, police
escorted first Vice President Mike Pence and then senators out of the chamber. The intruders took turns posing for photographs
at the dais.
But online, another narrative is unfolding as some deny
what happened and instead push "false flag" claims. (False flags are supposed covert operations designed to deflect blame.
They are frequently the subject of conspiracy theories.)
"The moment we realized this is a staged psyop," someone
tweeted
,
sharing a video of a Capitol police officer retreating as a mob of people walks toward him.
Other social media users have shared an image of a man
behind the dais in the Senate chamber with his arm raised. Standing above him in the gallery, a photographer is pointing his
camera down.
The photographer is circled and a red arrow is drawn
pointing to another red circle around the man at the dais.
"This look staged to you?" reads the text over the image.
"Fist in the air classic Trump supporter signal, right?"
But text elsewhere on the photo seems to refute that
illusion: "NOT MAGA," it says.
"I have friends in DC now and they are saying don't
believe the media," said one
Instagram
post that shared the image
. "Antifa is who stormed the capital through the back. Protesters are in the front praying and
singing. They are looking to divide us even more. They are also blocking live streams from real people. Why on earth would
they do that? They don't want you to see what's really going on."
This post was flagged as part of Facebook's efforts to
combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our
partnership
with Facebook
.)
As the people who supported the censoring and the eventual de-platforming the President on
social media are about to find out , if you can censor the President you can censor anyone or any
group.
It's all been allowed to happen for an obvious agenda of compliance and control. From 'riots'
of BLM/Antifa to the 'insurrection' of Trumpeteers, the point is to narrow accepted thought - to
manufacture consent, which is much easier with an un or misinformed populace. A social credit
system is coming to the west - call it the Karen Revolution. There will be some kind of
unexpected blowback, as many "deplorable" are technically savy
Notable quotes:
"... Definitely staged event, whether the protestors knew or didn't. Going forward, I'm switching to Signal from WhatsApp and viber, have to rethink my use of Gmail as well. Don't use faceborg or Jill Dorsey's twat. Enough is enough! ..."
As the people who supported the censoring and the eventual de-platforming the President on
social media are about to find out , if you can censor the President you can censor anyone or
any group.
But they were so caught up in the hysteria of the #OrangeManBad that they didn't take the
actions of Big Tech , that they were supporting, and to its logical conclusion:
Definitely staged event, whether the protestors knew or didn't. Going forward, I'm
switching to Signal from WhatsApp and viber, have to rethink my use of Gmail as well. Don't
use faceborg or Jill Dorsey's twat. Enough is enough!
The events at the Capitol buildings was literally the closest the US has ever come to a
working class revolution but woke pseudoleftists are completly blind to that since it didn't
feature many black trans women and it wasn't sponsored by JPMorgan and Apple
A revolution it wasn't.
The protesters wanted the election nullified due to fraud....
Anyone who investigated the 2020 election knows fraud was rampant.
74 million were acknowledged to have voted for Trump.
There were 156 million registered voters...
65% voted == 101 million
That leaves 27.5 million for Biden.
These numbers agree with participation in the rallies held by the two camps...
Question..... why was it so important for the Democrats to regain power??? Why did they
pull out all the stops to hobble Trump these past 4 years...???
What do they intend to do????
INDY
PS: Why doesn't Trump have Biden declared incompetent???
I thought SyrianGirl had a pretty interesting take on the whole thing. First debunks some
unlikely theories floating around, then points out in no uncertain terms that anyone who
would label that shit terrorism has no idea what the real thing is like. Those who have
been on the receiving end have no such delusions. She is quite hard on Trump for basically
caving in, and predicts very hard times ahead for "deplorables" and all those who might be
even tangentially linked to them--since after all, if we're calling it terrorism, you get
all kinds of nifty new laws, surveillance, infiltration, and the like which become
perfectly accepted.
That was very powerful from SyrianGirl! This should be viewed by everyone, she makes a lot
of sense regarding the definition of what terrorism is and many other things. The clip where
Pelosi says that what remains if the Capitol crumbles is their support for Israel is gold!.
Thank you for the link!
That Syrian Girl vid was earth-shattering in its clarity, simplicity and truth. Hope it
gets widely viewed and copied saved and shared to other more durable formats, before the
Body's bloody red gaze fall's upon it...
In addition to that Pelosi 'giving it all up for Israel' shot,
I also thought what she said about Trump was on target.
Which makes me wonder if the Borg continuum could have already quietly taken care of him,
if you know what I mean?
Nothing in this year's elections surprises me. I predicted all this over four years ago in
August 2016. The only thing that surprised me was that Trump was sworn in on January 20,
2017. For a short time I believed that the United States was a democracy where elections
could change policy. It is not!
(I originally
wrote this as comment to Andrew Korybko's Facebook post on August 15, 2016.)
Why Trump can't win
Even if Trump gets a majority of the votes the chances of him actually becoming
President are slim. Here are some of the tactics and tricks the Hillary camp could use to
block his election. I cannot say what is the probability of these options, but they have
all been tested in previous US sponsored color revolutions.
Massive propaganda campaign will pressure the electorate to vote against their
favorite candidate.
If Trump still gets over 50% of the vote, the vote count will be falsified.
(Something similar seems to have happened in the Austrian presidential election.)
If the election results actually show a victory for Trump, the results will be
annulled. DNC will claim that "Putin" hacked the voting machines. The Supreme Court will
declare Hillary the winner.
If all else fails, Hillary will call for a Maidan-style occupation of Washington DC.
The revolutionaries will take over the Capitol and the White House -- with the support of
pro-Hillary officials.
I continued in the original post on August 16, 2016.
Trump cannot be allowed to win precisely because -- as you say on the video -- he
represents the non-system opposition. He does not even have the support of his own party.
This is not a simple question of counting votes. For him to actually become president, he
has to win by a large margin.
Andrew, you are an expert on hybrid war. Why would Hillary not unleash the full array of
hybrid war weapons on Trump? In fact they are doing it already. Trump has been labeled the
"Manchurian Candidate". Ukraine fell to Maidan because no one in Ukraine was willing to
defend the institution of the presidency or the Ukrainian constitution. Why would the US be
any different.
You write: "4 wouldn't fully succeed because of the counter-Color Revolution technology
that the Trump supporters could organize in their own demonstrations and movements" You are
wrong. These are not "Trump supporters" but "Putin Trolls". Why would any mainstream media
give any voice to these people?
For an anti-Trump Maidan or coup to fail, Trump would personally have to lead the
opposition. In doing so he would be putting his life, liberty and fortune at risk. He can
be pressured or "advised" to give up the fight. In fact it would be easiest to just
assassinate him.
Many things can happen before we are at scenario 4. The simplest option is to escalate a
crisis or war with Russia, Hillary's anti-Trump strategy is already framing the election as
between her and Putin. In a crisis scenario Trump would simply be dismissed as a Russian
enemy agent.
***
Why am I writing all this delusional stuff about a coup in the US or even of potential
civil war?
Democracy requires a free press. That no longer exist in the West. Instead the Powers
that Be have created an enormously powerful hybrid war machine that they have turned on
Libya, Syria, Russia (and on European democracy). They are able to manipulate reality like
never before. They are a huge danger to any state or any democracy.
I am just trying to imagine what would happen if these tools were turned on the USA.
Definitely staged event, whether the protestors knew or didn't. Going forward, I'm
switching to Signal from WhatsApp and viber, have to rethink my use of Gmail as well. Don't
use faceborg or Jill Dorsey's twat. Enough is enough!
It's what I said would happen in the other thread:
Watching the spectacle from a far a couple of things stand out for me.
This event has really put the fear of God into the DC political class. When you see the
photos of the politicians during this event you see real fear. I bet not one of them ever
thought that the people would be so fed up with the DC political class that they would
storm the Capitol to show their frustration. Such behaviour was simply un-American. It was
things you saw on TV happening in far away places. Never would such scenes ever happen in
the good ole' USA.
The second thing that stands out for me is that the American people have reached their
wits end with the political class and are prepared to do what no-one ever thought they
would do. Storm the Capitol! Disorganised as it was. What can they achieve with real
organisation!
So now the people realise they have power in a collective and this power has put the
fear of God in the people they despise. This has truly been a transformative event both for
the political class and both for the people.
You can see this fear in the hysterical way the DC political class has reacted to this
event. I don't think this hysteria is fake. I think it is quite real. They are so desperate
to regain control of the "narrative" that they are flooding this forum (as pointed out
eloquently by William Gruff, and no doubt many other forums) with sock puppets to denounce
anyone who disagrees with the establishment view.
This hysteria is going to lead to an over reaction which will in turn spur these people
not just to lob a Molotov cocktail (politically speaking) at the DC political class but to
become one themselves.
There is nothing so dangerous as a person with nothing to lose and nothing so fearful as
a man with everything to lose.
How it will play out I don't know, but the old normal has been shattered.
That the USA is a single-party with two branches that play "good cop, bad cop" already
is consensus among serious historians, sociologists, political scientists etc. The news
here is that this system won't change with Biden.
The Vandal sack of Rome of 455 CE was a completely different scenario. By that time,
Rome had only symbolic importance to the Empire, and already was at an advanced stage of
economic decay. Indeed, that's the main factor that differentiates the High from the Late
Empire: the end of Italic hegemony, and the economic rise of the Eastern cities (Nicomedia,
Antioch, Constantinople, Nicephorum etc.). Or, on a second thought, is it? Is the USA in
really such advanced stage of economic decline? Only time will tell.
One last observation is that people usually confuse change with revolution. A given
society doesn't need to go through any revolution in order to change itself. On the
contrary: societal change is always happening, as we talk. What makes revolutions special
is the fact that the previously exploited class becomes the dominant class; they turn the
society upside down (hence the name).
But even a society that avoids any revolution will still change and eventually
degenerate and die. Personally, I like prof. Moniz Bandeira's "Mutazione dello Stato",
literally "mutation of the State", which describes a situation where the contradictions of
society (development of the productive forces and the relations of production) continues to
develop without a revolutionary situation or scenario. In this case, the USA is
"mutating".
We've been in this environment since 911. It's been one continual project, not something
new being being imposed. It's a continual tightening of society, including the
Pandemic.
It's all been allowed to happen for an obvious agenda of compliance and control. From
'riots' of BLM/Antifa to the 'insurrection' of Trumpeteers, the point is to narrow accepted
thought - to manufacture consent, which is much easier with an un or misinformed populace.
A social credit system is coming to the west - call it the Karen Revolution.
Democracy is not an option, and never has been. Time to network with slow-mail and smoke
signals, because as an organizing principle beyond sales and marketing, the internet's days
are numbered.
Yes, the only difference is that one side, the deplorables, are speaking truth to power.
The other side is conviently putting its head in the sand right now and begging for more
federal overreach.
I have tried to explain over the past while, that what we are seeing in the US is an
ongoing coup, This is a coup against the US people by the US corporate and financial
oligarchs. Clearly, they are benefiting by not simply enriching themselves at taxpayers
expense, but securing their own criminal amoral behaviour through the supression of human
rights and what is left of the freedom of speech in the US. This is accelaerating
exponentially and has been going on long before Trump came on the scene.
Avoid paying attention to the distractions, and keep your eye on the ball.
Stealing the election. Trying to remove Trump from office, with two weeks to go, and
'erase' him from the internet (and politics and whatelse?). Turning the U.S. into a
de-facto police state. And the rush to do this all very quickly.
This smacks of desperation.
What are their Dems (rather their Deep State and 'Globalist' bosses) afraid of?
I have tried to explain over the past while, that what we are seeing in the US is an
ongoing coup, This is a coup against the US people by the US corporate and financial
oligarchs. Clearly, they are benefiting by not simply enriching themselves at taxpayers
expense, but securing their own criminal amoral behaviour through the supression of human
rights and what is left of the freedom of speech in the US. This is accelaerating
exponentially and has been going on long before Trump came on the scene.
Avoid paying attention to the distractions, and keep your eye on the ball.
"... They are not afraid. It is about creating the atmosphere for the last evisceration of civil liberties, of legalized censorship, the crushing of any dissent, a one-party state (in the service of global capitalism). This is not really just about Trump or his supporters (although, unlike Biden, Trump has genuine mass support). This will be used against all of us. ..."
"... It is stunning to watch now as every War on Terror rhetorical tactic to justify civil liberties erosions is now being invoked in the name of combatting Trumpism, including the aggressive exploitation of the emotions triggered by yesterday's events at the Capitol to accelerate their implementation and demonize dissent over the quickly formed consensus. ..."
"... Within hours of the Capitol being cleared, we heard truly radical proposals from numerous members of Congress. Senators and House members who objected to Electoral College certification, or questioned its legitimacy, should be formally accused of sedition and removed from expelled from the House if not prosecuted, argued Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO), with other House members expressing support. Even those unarmed protesters who peacefully entered the Capitol should, many argued, be hunted by the FBI as domestic terrorists. ..."
"... Greenwald doesn't expose what happened yesterday as a filmed, orchestrated psychological operation to create a false narrative to allow for the restrictions on civil liberties that were already written years ago and require manufactured incidents such as this staged coup and all the other staged events like 9-11, terrorism and fake pandemics to justify their passage. ..."
"... This entire farce is playing out exactly as the Transition Integrity Project outlined. ..."
"... The problem I have with people like Greenwald and others who have connections to the Intelligence Community, is that the 20% they don't reveal is far more valuable than the 80% we already know. ..."
"... The crazed attempt by the establishment to completely censor Trump, and then to take down Trump via 25th Amendment or impeachment with just 2 weeks left in his administration, smacks of something they desperately fear: His release of extremely damaging classified materials or the dissemination of other information that he can only do as president. ..."
"... But the idea that he can unilaterally order the careerist members of the armed forces to take over the country, never mind a bunch of yahoos supposedly controlling the capitol building (without inside help), for his benefit is beyond ludicrous. Not for a president whose administration had widespread open insubordination, trumpeted without consequences by MSM. ..."
"... With all the tens of Billions of dollars pumped into State Security and the massive surveillance industry, we are told that the Capitol was unprepared for a rally that had been announced weeks in advance. ..."
"... Every event is conducted with an eye to promoting the same themes in the press. Military intelligence is disciplined not creative. You will know psyops by their familiar M.O., the familiar beneficiary and the familiar headlines in the press. ..."
What is the US elite so afraid of? What do they fear that Trump might do in the last days of his presidency?
George Mc , Jan 8, 2021 2:26 PM Reply to
Steve Hayes
They don't fear Trump at all. He's the necessary "nasty Right Wing COVID denier" to set up
as anti-Pope to the new Green "post capitalist" wonder world.
Correct. Its all a puppet show to easily convince the gullible. And to make the path easy
for the planners of this game. Trump is also playing his part, no doubt paid off and laughing
at it all.
Tom Larsen , Jan 8, 2021 3:07 PM Reply to
Steve Hayes
They are not afraid. It is about creating the atmosphere for the last evisceration of
civil liberties, of legalized censorship, the crushing of any dissent, a one-party state (in
the service of global capitalism). This is not really just about Trump or his supporters
(although, unlike Biden, Trump has genuine mass support). This will be used against all of
us.
From Glenn Greenwald yesterday:
It is stunning to watch now as every War on Terror rhetorical tactic to justify civil
liberties erosions is now being invoked in the name of combatting Trumpism, including the
aggressive exploitation of the emotions triggered by yesterday's events at the Capitol to
accelerate their implementation and demonize dissent over the quickly formed consensus. The
same framework used to assault civil liberties in the name of foreign terrorism is now being
seamlessly applied -- often by those who spent the last two decades objecting to it -- to the
threat posed by "domestic white supremacist terrorists," the term preferred by liberal
elites, especially after yesterday, for Trump supporters generally. In so many ways,
yesterday was the liberals' 9/11, as even the
most sensible commentators among them are resorting to the most unhinged rhetoric
available.
Within hours of the Capitol being cleared, we heard truly radical proposals from numerous
members of Congress. Senators and House members who objected to Electoral College
certification, or questioned its legitimacy, should be formally accused of sedition and
removed from expelled from the House if not prosecuted, argued Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO),
with other House members expressing support. Even those unarmed protesters who peacefully
entered the Capitol should, many argued, be hunted by the FBI as domestic terrorists.
Calls proliferated for the banning of the social media accounts of instigators and protest
participants. Journalists and politicians cheered the decision by Facebook and Twitter to
temporarily bar the President from using their service, and then cheered again when
Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg
announced on Tuesday that the ban on Trump extended through Biden's inauguration. Some
journalists, such as CNN 's Oliver Darcy,
complained that Facebook had not gone far enough, that more mass censorship was needed of
right-wing voices. The once-radical 2006 Gingrich argument -- that some opinions are too
dangerous to allow to be expressed because they are pro-terrorist and insurrectionary -- is
now thriving, close to a consensus.
These calls for censorship, online and official, are grounded in the long-discredited,
oft-rejected and dangerous view that a person should be held legally accountable not only for
their own illegal actions but also for the consequences of their protected speech :
meaning the actions others take when they hear inflammatory rhetoric. That was the distorted
mentality used by the State of Mississippi in the 1970s to try to hold NAACP leaders liable
for the violent acts of their followers against boycott violators after hearing rousing
pro-boycott speeches from NAACP leaders, only for the Supreme Court in 1982 to
unanimously reject such efforts on the ground that "while the State legitimately may
impose damages for the consequences of violent conduct, it may not award compensation for the
consequences of nonviolent, protected activity," adding that even "advocacy of the use of
force or violence does not remove speech from the protection of the first amendment."
The complete reversal in mentality from just a few months ago is dizzying. Those who spent
the summer demanding the police be defunded are furious that the police response at the
Capitol was insufficiently robust, violent and aggressive. Those who urged the abolition of
prisons are demanding Trump supporters be imprisoned for years. Those who, under the banner
of "anti-fascism," demanded the firing of a top New York Times editor for publishing
an op-ed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) advocating the deployment of the U.S. military to quell
riots -- a view deemed not just wrong but unspeakable in decent society -- are today furious
that the National Guard was not deployed at the Capitol to quash pro-Trump supporters. Antifa
advocates are working to expose the names of Capitol protesters to empower the FBI to arrest
them on terrorism charges. And while Rep. Cori Bush's proposal to unseat members of Congress
for their subversive views went mega-viral, many forget that in 1966, the Georgia State
Legislature refused to seat Julian Bond
after he refused to repudiate his anti-war work with the Student Non-Violent Coordinating
Committee, then considered a domestic terrorist group.
Those who argued in the summer that property damage is meaningless or
even noble are treating smashed windows and looted podiums at the Capitol as treason, as
a coup. One need not dismiss the lamentable actions of yesterday to simultaneously reject
efforts to apply terms that are plainly inapplicable: attempted coup, insurrection,
sedition . There was zero chance that the few hundred people who breached the Capitol
could overthrow the U.S. Government -- the most powerful, armed and militarized entity in the
world -- nor did they try.
Researcher , Jan 8, 2021 4:23 PM Reply to
Tom Larsen
But once again Glenn plays the divide and conquer narrative instead of exposing the
obvious psychological operation against both sides so they demonize each other instead of the
structure that imprisons them through legal fraud.
Tom Larsen , Jan 8, 2021 4:46 PM Reply to
Researcher
How do you get that out of what Greenwald says? Yes, GG stays clear of anything with a CIA
conspiracy theory label on it. OTOH, his expertise is Consitutional law and he has been
documenting the concentration of power of abrogation of civil liberties for twenty years. And
that is really what this response to the "coup" is all about. He is right about
that.
There's one quote that I think sums up this moment:
"Sure we'll have Fascism here, but it will come as an anti-Fascism movement."
-Huey Long
Anti-anti-fascism to be formally inaugurated on 1-20-2021.
Moneycircus , Jan 8, 2021 5:31 PM Reply to
Tom Larsen
Anti-fascism is the new fascism.
It makes perverse sense if you follow the Corporatist money. Many of the giants of the
Corporatist State were persecuted by the Nazis. The fascist titans like Monsanto-Bayer-Exxon
are back but they seek a new cloak.
So they are trying the 1940s Corporatist State trick once again, but it cannot be seen in the
same light: it should be presented as the opposite.
So anti-anti-fascism will be demonized if not banned.
True anti-fascists, such as those who cling to the Constitution, will be called right wing.
Defenders of the family or religion in the face of the state will be called white
supremacists. This has already begun.
Researcher , Jan 8, 2021 5:38 PM Reply to
Tom Larsen
"How do you get that out of what Greenwald says?"
Because of his pretense that voting matters or the law matters. The law is ignored,
applied or restructured according to whom it serves, which is the cabal who run the world
through governments, the monetary system, the legal system and NGOs that hide the criminal
acts and the fraud behind their use of the law.
Greenwald doesn't expose what happened yesterday as a filmed, orchestrated psychological
operation to create a false narrative to allow for the restrictions on civil liberties that
were already written years ago and require manufactured incidents such as this staged coup
and all the other staged events like 9-11, terrorism and fake pandemics to justify their
passage.
This entire farce is playing out exactly as the Transition Integrity Project outlined.
Tom Larsen , Jan 8, 2021 7:19 PM Reply to
Researcher
RE: Because of his pretense that voting matters or the law matters. The law is ignored,
applied or restructured according to whom it serves
Well, I guess everything is hunky dory then, same as it ever was. Fascism is just a state
mind, right?
Greenwald clearly leaves open the possibility that this was orchestrated.
At the time of his writing, there was not enough info to say that. He's not you , he
requires decent sources.
This was not how the TIP script was written. They anticipated a perceived Trump
win. Not that it matters much anymore.
Researcher , Jan 8, 2021 9:54 PM Reply to
Tom Larsen
TIP did not anticipate a Trump win. Did you read the scenarios?
My observations are based on understanding that fascism presented with illusory voting is
still fascism. Whatever political flavor it's marketed as, is irrelevant.
Greenwald's lies including those about Reality Winner and her fake NSA-Russia hacking
documents make him a completely unreliable source, period. Also his insistence that Trump was
set up with the Russia hacking and collusion story when Trump and his team were part of the
entire plot from its inception and Russiagate was used to make Trump appear like he was a
victim of the "Deep State" and liberal media, reveal Greenwald's dishonesty.
Tom Larsen , Jan 8, 2021 10:07 PM Reply to
Researcher
RE: TIP did not anticipate a Trump win. Did you read the scenarios?
I don't remember seeing a scenario where Trump loses. It was months ago and a very long
article. If you can point it out, that would be appreciated.
RE: My observations are based on understanding that fascism presented with illusory voting
is still fascism.
Then I would say that you make no distinction between fascism and liberal democracy. I am
an anti-capitalist, so I see fascism as a subset of capitalism. Structurally, the differences
between them are not huge, nonetheless there are important differences especially regarding
civil liberties. As to voting, I would refer to Emma Goldman.
RE: make him a completely unreliable source,
You are entitled to your opinion. I think that is a self-limiting and unwise position to
take. That means you'll only consider sources that you agree with 100%. You're making your
own information silo.
Bob the Hod , Jan 8, 2021 5:36 PM Reply to
Researcher
I guess he just doesn't see it like that, and that's fine, it's his right to have that
opinion, and it's his right to not to divulge all of his personal opinions if he thinks that
some of them could alienate him from his readers or land him in trouble in some way.
I think you're right. But I think he's speaking a lot of truth too, on another level.
Researcher , Jan 8, 2021 7:18 PM Reply to
Bob the Hod
But surely that's his purpose. To provide 80% truth and 20% untruth through purposeful
omission of the most important points. I don't know the exact proportion, I am only using the
80%-20% as a tool for demonstration purposes because I don't read any Greenwald at all since
he started working for the Intercept.
The problem I have with people like Greenwald and others who have connections to the
Intelligence Community, is that the 20% they don't reveal is far more valuable than the 80%
we already know.
SCHOPENHAUER'S LAW OF ENTROPY -- If you put a spoonful of wine in a barrel of sewage, you
have sewage. If you put a spoonful of sewage in a barrel of wine, you have sewage.
George Mc , Jan 8, 2021 1:35 PM
I suspect things will start moving fast now. Our overlords may suspect that the COVID
maneuver has weaknesses and cannot be prolonged indefinitely unless an acceleration is
applied. And I hear yet again about the ambulance service being stretched to the utmost of
cliché mongering.
Yup there it is: "unprecedented pressure that the NHS is facing" etc. Hospitals too busy
with cases but hang on – some good news: a new vaccine from Coke or is it Pepsi?
No matter – the "completely unforeseen and not at all forced" pressure on the NHS
will continue. And that won't matter because we have innumerable vax chancers to grind out
well as much vax as is needed to keep the gravy train going.
I was never in any doubt, that this is just a GCHQ operation.
Norm , Jan 8, 2021 12:50 PM
The crazed attempt by the establishment to completely censor Trump, and then to take down
Trump via 25th Amendment or impeachment with just 2 weeks left in his administration, smacks
of something they desperately fear: His release of extremely damaging classified materials or
the dissemination of other information that he can only do as president.
But the idea that he can unilaterally order the careerist members of the armed forces to
take over the country, never mind a bunch of yahoos supposedly controlling the capitol
building (without inside help), for his benefit is beyond ludicrous. Not for a president
whose administration had widespread open insubordination, trumpeted without consequences by
MSM.
Only in a nation half in denial, which is their cognitive dissonance resolution for the
incessant "news" stream supporting Big Lies that is jammed down their throats 24/7, can this
occur.
Moneycircus , Jan 8, 2021 1:28 PM Reply to
Bilejones
This was a Charlottesville-style set up. Expect more of them.
With all the tens of Billions of dollars pumped into State Security and the massive
surveillance industry, we are told that the Capitol was unprepared for a rally that had been
announced weeks in advance.
Every event is conducted with an eye to promoting the same themes in the press. Military
intelligence is disciplined not creative. You will know psyops by their familiar M.O., the
familiar beneficiary and the familiar headlines in the press.
K Ford , Jan 8, 2021 12:44 PM
Today I am afraid.
Not for me, but for the people I see around me.
The return of the thousand yard stare – a symptom of those who feel fear, from
whatever cause, or from a situation which is perceived as beyond any kind of optimism.
Usually seen from photos of Vietnam conflict.
NO, not everybody behaved as "visitors". There were violent hooligans as well who got into lawmakers offices and stole things. Were
they provicators or onot God knows. But this was a mob. Mass of people without organization., without leadership and without any program.
Notable quotes:
"... ... what happened was an classical highjacking of an event proclaimed in days before it was due to happen, and they where prepared, bussed in the storm troops, and the event that followed was allowed to happen ..."
"... Operation Gladio America? A false flag with a state sponsored murder of an unarmed young woman for flavor? The elites including the Republicans and Democrats staged the event-me thinks. Pence was their man in place. An elitist. Good cover for not wanting to verify the election results which, either way it had gone, would have at least brought closure. Like the results or not. ..."
"... They want control. ..."
"... Lets stop pretending that the far-right as represented by that crowd yesterday are the cuddly freedom lovers and that the democrats are the hateful tyrants. Politically they are are both faces of the corporate fascist state that uses the people as tools in their greedy claims to power. ..."
"... Obviously, these "protests" were a staged event, and participants had the same minuscule mental caliber as the persons who put them up to it. These types of disruptions will make passage of needed legislation and corrections of improper Laws next to impossible. ..."
"... The protests were genuine, peaceful and quite possibly organic. However, the "storming", the "insurrection", the "coup" of the Capitol building was orchestrated to create a climate of fear (like 9/11) to serve a political end. ..."
"... As the Establishment spins it this will be used to concentrate their power, criminalize dissent and crush any organized opposition. They don't want to repeal the Patriot Act, they want to expand it! That is exactly why Tulsi's principled bill will go nowhere. ..."
"... like Cuomo said, "Where does it say protests have to be peaceful?" ..."
"... Trump was never more than a bloviating, empty vessel. He expected other people to fight for him, but never fought for himself. Millions who put their faith in him and supported him now face persecution and worse from a vengeful democrat establishment controlling Congress and the presidency. ..."
The media are already spinning a narrative around the events in Washington DC. One that bears no resemblance to reality, does
not hold up to any kind of scrutiny and will have massive, far-reaching consequences for all of us.
They're calling it "one of the darkest days in our nations history", a day that will "live in infamy". It will likely be memed
into a shorthand date – 1/6/21, like 9/11 and 7/7. It will be the day "American democracy was attacked and prevailed", the day the
nation nearly fell to "fascists".
It will become just one more grand sweeping illusion upon which the teetering structures of US Imperial power are built.
The story we are being told goes as follows:
Yesterday, as congress was preparing to pass the vote endorsing Joe Biden's election victory, thousands of violent right-wing thugs
stormed the Capitol building.
Acting according to Trump's wishes, and with his endorsement, these domestic terrorists overran the police barricades in an
attempt to overthrow the senate and preserve Trump's presidency.
Fortunately the police were able to secure the situation, drive the violent rioters out and the democratic process was able
to continue.
Not one single part of this story is true:
There was no "storming" There was no "incitement" There was no "violence" And the riot effectively ended Trump's presidency.
Let's tackle them one at a time.
* * *
1. There was no "storming". Rather videos show
police opening barriers
to let the "rioters" in.
2. There was no "incitement". All of Trump's social media posts on the subject instructed people to "go home" "with peace and
love".
Is that inciting violence?
Twitter and facebook took the totally unprecedented step of completely removing those posts, and blocked him posting any further.
They claimed to be preventing further violence, but it looks more like they concealed Trump's denunciations of violence.
3. There was no violence. Indeed whether or not Trump "incited" anything is moot, because there was no violence. Disregard the
reports of chemical weapons, pipe bombs or IEDs – none of which ever appeared. None of the "rioters" are as yet shown to have hurt
anyone.
The only person reportedly killed or injured was a protester allegedly shot by the police.
Compare and contrast the attitude of the
media to this "violence", vs the
"fiery but mostly peaceful" protests all last summer.
4. The riot ended Trump's presidency. Although the Congressional session was widely described in the press as the "confirmation
vote" for Joe Biden's election victory, it was actually rather more than that.
VP Mike Pence was chairing a joint-session which intended to allow full speeches from those opposing the election and maintaining
there had been fraud.
The violence brought this session to an end prematurely, totally undermined Trump's legal and procedural challenges and killed
any chance he had of overturning the electoral college vote. No sooner was the "attack" over, than many of the Republicans in both
houses who were planning to oppose Biden's election
backed-down
So, who has really benefitted from the "chaos at the Capitol"? Because it surely isn't Donald Trump.
One should always be wary of any event which "accidentally" achieves the exact opposite of its stated or apparent intent.
* * *
In the title, I refer to this as America's Reichstag fire
, and that's not just emotive language, the parallels are pretty clear: A staged attack on a political building, deliberately misattributed
to political enemies and used to consolidate the power of a freshly installed leader.
Even the media coverage is similar, the Nazi government and their tools in the press talked about it in the same exact terms as
the US establishment is describing this farcical "coup attempt". Aiming to terrify people into thinking they were on the verge of
an all-out civil war.
Read this quote, and ask yourself if it couldn't be lifted almost completely from the front page of the Washington Post or New
York Times today:
The burning of the Reichstag was intended to be the signal for a bloody uprising and civil war. Large-scale pillaging in Berlin
was planned for as early as four o'clock in the morning on Tuesday. It has been determined that starting today throughout Germany
acts of terrorism were to begin against prominent individuals, against private property, against the lives and safety of the peaceful
population, and general civil war was to be unleashed
Within 24 hours of the Reichstag burning, the German President had passed the
Reichstag Fire Decree , which declared a state
of emergency that totally reversed every civil right the Weimar Republic had guaranteed its citizens:
Articles 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124 and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. It
is therefore permissible to restrict the rights of personal freedom [habeas corpus], freedom of (opinion) expression, including
the freedom of the press, the freedom to organize and assemble, the privacy of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications.
While these freedoms have already been severely undermined in the US by the
Patriot Act and its successors, those few rights left to
American citizens will definitely be under threat once Trump is finally removed and Biden (or Harris) is put in his place.
Although there is not yet any talk of legislation, it's certainly true there are whispers of purges and other measures to "protect
the constitution".
As Twitter and Facebook limit discussion, alternative platforms will be shutdown. Enforcing a corporate monopoly that cooperates
with the state the very definition of fascism.
All this in the name of protecting the nation from "neo-nazi thugs" or "white supremacists" or other phantom threats. In the name
of "protecting the constitution", they are tearing it to pieces. In the name of "preventing a coup", they are carrying one out in
front of our eyes.
It puts in mind Huey Long's famous quote when asked if fascism would ever come to America:
Sure, we'll have Fascism in this country and we'll call it anti-Fascism."
Robbobbobin , Jan 9, 2021 12:52 AM
1. Rather videos show police opening barriers to let the "rioters" in.
The linked video starts with a section the fence already removed and, if it were ever there, where it is when the shot opens.
No evidence of who removed (?) it – protesters or the police or no-one. Maybe there is a clip which resolves the question, but
the linked video is not it and the commentary reports only police-protester 'squabbling'. Stopped reading there. There is 'evidence'
of something and there is 'not-evidence'. This is 'not-evidence'. Waiting for an update that includes a either a definitive clip
or that presents no such unsupported claim as 'evidence'.
mikael , Jan 9, 2021 12:09 AM
Once again OffG you nailed it thruoutly, realy good.
Some advices, I dont jump on some for me an bit over the top nonsense, events like this have been highjacked before, it happens
regulary all over the world even in Norway, even when they where demostrating about issues as AGW, where 99.9% was peaceful, the
problem starts when the Gov dont want it to be to big, or for whatever reason, they put provos and civil clouthed Cops in the
front and have them to create the havoc needed to end this demonstration, or pays others, incl so called "anarcist" groups to
do just that, like in the YW in France, black clad people creating violence, and thereby the reasons to intervine, its standard
procedure, back in time as far I can remeber.
To them drool something about operation Gladio is dragging it a bit to far, this was nothing but an standard tactic for creating
an false flag and then the reasons to engage into protective issues as we are experiencing right now when the MSM and others are
creating narratives as rightwinged domestic terrorists, etc, and focuses in an small group witch highjacked everything and killed
the genuine cause and reason for this demonstartion witch took place, since it was an coup, we all know that.
Yea, fascinating isnt it, some can riot, create no go zones unless of course if only BLM and f . everything ellse, and burns
down inner citys, police stations, smal bizzenizzes, kill inocent people, incl blacks, execute cildren, harass anyone whom they
dont like, attack with violence people whom they find to be politicaly not on their side and accuses them for been everything
from Nazis, racists, white ass supremacys, rightwinged, etc, you name it, and all thru this months of unrest, the same people
and MSMs whom is now hyping uh . iligale ciolent protests or even better, domestic terrorism, rightwinged terror, etc, what could
possibly go wrong, yup, reality is derailing in real time, even the radical fake left, by the way, they are not left, nor socialists,
maybe an commie or two, but the fake lefts job was to make sure this times, the last year, was to marginalise and polarize society,
with of course promisses never intended to be kept, and right before this uh . event, even the DNCs ignored them, but now, once
again they can roam free with narratives as cleansing, etc to rightwinged, of course anyone whom dont suck up their bullshit have
to be an nazi.
Hallelujah.
So, why do you apologize, tell me, why, you sould never, never, never apoligize, never, bitches.
Thousands of people did the right thing, protested non voilently, took an stand and went there to make sure we all saw it,
and did nothing, absolutely nothing wrong, never forget that, so why the bloody hell do you crawl in front of the scumbags in
charge and apologize, people with no spine do that, even when they have to admit things that wasn't done by anyone of them, because
they didn't do anything wrong.
... what happened was an classical highjacking of an event proclaimed in days before it was due to happen, and they where
prepared, bussed in the storm troops, and the event that followed was allowed to happen because of what you experience now,
in the aftermath of the protest, read the MSM, witch the corpoRat bitches and general fake left scums howl, the tech facists cencures
everybody whom isnt pimping their propaganda, even an president, and the political theater where they compet about been the best
butt cheek spreader for the elite, yeah, what did you expect, they did what their masters told them to do, throw the people of
the UssA under the buss, for an fist full of shekles.
Never, forget and never ever forgive the teason you watch unfold this days, they think in short terms, and forgets there comes
an time when they will be elected again, what you must never forget is that when that time comes, you must have your options ready,
fight back, and kick them all out.
But, never apologize, it was your god dammed duty to protest, because we all know this was an coup.
peace
Leo , Jan 8, 2021 11:50 PM
Operation Gladio America? A false flag with a state sponsored murder of an unarmed young woman for flavor? The elites including
the Republicans and Democrats staged the event-me thinks. Pence was their man in place. An elitist. Good cover for not wanting
to verify the election results which, either way it had gone, would have at least brought closure. Like the results or not.
But, They don't want closure, they want chaos. They want control.
The good thing is that the Republican Party is now dead, may it rest in pieces. Losing over 74 Million voters plus ( Trump
obviously won by a landslide, hence the overt and obvious theft, and add to that atrocity; the overt prevention of an open, honest
inquiry of the election). Huge loss never to be gained back. A Trump comes around only once in a crumbling empire. No RINO was
(or will) attract those many and diverse votes.
But, the other Silver lining is the implosion of the brain dead Democratic Party can I get an "A-woman!" re "A-women" "A..
. Gender Fluid Woman". Sheesh! Underway is an emerging progressive party that is fully aware of the fraud going on in the "Bizarre
-O- World of the Zombies" Leadersh*t.
So America did do extremely well at least as far as "Woke – ness" is concerned. The operation of the Idiocracy of a Harris
Administration is "swamp business as usual" with an avalanche of oppressive acts. The sis woman has no morals. Lucky us.
Geoffrey Skoll , Jan 8, 2021 8:32 PM
US Reichstag Fire was 9/11. Of course this Jan 6 event was a show. The Constitution was burned long ago. First Amendment says
"Congress shall make no law . . abridging the right of the people peaceably to assemble . . ." It does NOT say "except when some
people are sick." By the way, for both right and left wing trolls, I am a revolutionary communist and Wobbly. This is not Germany
1933, 1934, or even 1938. The USA is Germany 1942, on the eve of the Wannsee Conference on the Final Solution January 20 1942.
Watch for it.
To Kit: Keep up the attempts to keep people rational.
Ken Garoo , Jan 8, 2021 8:04 PM
Some strange goings on happened at the protest, for sure
Someone published a photo of the protestors at the White House, framed through a gallows with a noose hanging down from the
gallows. This symbol was used by radical right Zionists in Israel to frame images of Yitzhak Rabin shortly before he was assassinated
by a zealot.
There is also an interesting back story to one of the more outlandishly dressed protestors.
This guy, wearing a raccoon skin cloak and a bullet-proof vest marked 'police' is Aaron Mostofsky, a Brooklyn Orthodox Jew
whose father is New York State Superior Court judge and powerful Democratic Party leader.
Great encapsulation of our situation. Compared to the 2014 (?) overthrow WE fomented in the Ukraine, where legislators and
the president fled for their lives through flames and flying bullets, it was tame. Joe Biden has bragged about his leadership
role in it all. And carpetbagged there during Obama's presidency, something Biden is still unapologetic about.
Luckily dark clouds have their silver linings:
Trump's supporters are getting a chance to experience the ire and negation of their patriotism that he has had to endure since
getting into office.
Mad with bloodlust, the warmongers from DC to Tel Aviv are lining up new wars to wage now that Trump is not there to obstruct
them. Meanwhile, to the calm and clear-eyed the moral high ground is more obvious than ever, and they long ago stopped listening
to the propaganda that rules the airways. This is an opportune time for alliances among conservatives and progressives to coalesce
and form a solid base for a third party that will rise from the dust of the Democratic and Republican dross.
Taking a long look back at 2020, it is clear now that COVID was launched on the world with the precise goal of removing Donald
Trump from office. Live free or die must now be our only aim, to preserve the Republic. To all who read these words, know that
you were born for this moment. We will and must win this, or say goodbye to humanity as we know it.
Love conquers all.
George Mc , Jan 8, 2021 7:41 PM
One tell-tale sign of media bullshit is the story which is assembled suspiciously quickly and never varies thereafter. As in
the case of the Oswald-shot-Kennedy or bin Laden "did" 9/11, the story comes along with preternatural haste and remains impervious
to later findings until enough time passes for it to become a historical curiosity.
So Trump "instigated" this "coup" and this story gets endlessly recycled and so I caught a bit about how "we" can get Trump
to "admit what he's done" etc.
...
Andre , Jan 8, 2021 6:52 PM
Spot on and again it is about the Dems projecting, i.e. blaming Trump for their own coup(first attempt being the RussiaHoax,
projecting their own acts on to Trump)...
Capture , Jan 8, 2021 6:39 PM
Lets stop pretending that the far-right as represented by that crowd yesterday are the cuddly freedom lovers and that the
democrats are the hateful tyrants. Politically they are are both faces of the corporate fascist state that uses the people as
tools in their greedy claims to power.
Paul Vonharnish , Jan 8, 2021 6:15 PM
Obviously, these "protests" were a staged event, and participants had the same minuscule mental caliber as the persons
who put them up to it. These types of disruptions will make passage of needed legislation and corrections of improper Laws next
to impossible.
The protests were genuine, peaceful and quite possibly organic. However, the "storming", the "insurrection", the "coup"
of the Capitol building was orchestrated to create a climate of fear (like 9/11) to serve a political end.
As the Establishment spins it this will be used to concentrate their power, criminalize dissent and crush any organized
opposition. They don't want to repeal the Patriot Act, they want to expand it! That is exactly why Tulsi's principled bill will
go nowhere.
Sgt Oddball , Jan 8, 2021 5:33 PM
"Nan's Nuclear Meltdown!", or: "Nan' Jumps Shark!" – Film At 11'
Nobody in America is prepared to fight for democracy because they do not understand like their ancestors did, why it is like
to live in a tyranny, That goes for all western countries now.
WW1 and WW2 the goy were brainwashed just like today , msm is still in the same hands .
paul , Jan 8, 2021 4:52 PM
Within less than 24 hours, it was clear that many things were not quite right, and this was obviously a staged, engineered
event.
"Buffalo Man" has already been shown to be a professional actor from Arizona. The whole thing had a theatrical quality.
Nobody was hurt (at least not by the demonstrators.) There was no significant damage to property. A few doors and windows were
damaged. Papers were strewn around. People helped themselves to a few souvenirs. No politicians were assaulted, threatened or
taken hostage.
Compare this to the protracted rioting over the summer, CNN's "peaceful protests." Entire city blocks looted and burnt out
in multiple cities over 100 consecutive nights. Thousands of grocery and liquor store businesses belonging to Mr. Singh and Mr.
Patel gone. People murdered for wearing MAGA hats. No Go Areas set up with complete impunity. A "Summer Of Love." No sanctimonious
hand wringing and pearl clutching then. But like Cuomo said, "Where does it say protests have to be peaceful?"
All the senators and congressmen cheered themselves hoarse when incomparably greater violence was directed at legislatures
in Ukraine, Hong Kong, Bolivia and Venezuela. They deserve little sympathy. They are vile, evil, corrupt people.
Trump wanted a mass demonstration at the Capitol in the hope that it might put some backbone into spineless Republican jellyfish
for the first time in their lives. A noisy but peaceful mass protest was in his interests. A violent one was not. There would
have been a challenge to a blatantly rigged and stolen election. This did not take place. Instead, we have a blanket dismissal
of the evidence by the MSM, condemning "Trump's lies", "Trump's baseless allegations", "Trump's fraudulent claims."
This will just be a new episode in the consensus reality that is created, immune to any evidence, like 9/11, Wmd in Iraq, Skripal,
Russiagate, Corbyn's anti semitism, White Helmets, and all the rest. If in doubt, we can always turn to Johnson or Merkel or Trudeau
for moral guidance on the issue.
We can already see the uses to which the incident is being put. Rigid censorship by the MSM and Silicon Valley, starting with
Trump himself. Sweeping new powers for the FBI against "domestic terrorists." Surprisingly, Putin has not yet been blamed. No
doubt this omission will soon be rectified. More calls for Impeachment/ Pence to remove Trump.
Surprisingly, there has been little interest in the dead woman, who seems to have been memory holed already. This seems to
be an echo of Charlottesville, where a woman was also killed at another staged and manipulated event. Charlottesville was crawling
with operatives of the Trump-hating FBI. The leader of the "Tiki Torch Nazi Rally" was a democrat activist.
Trump was never more than a bloviating, empty vessel. He expected other people to fight for him, but never fought for himself.
Millions who put their faith in him and supported him now face persecution and worse from a vengeful democrat establishment controlling
Congress and the presidency.
Trump's appointments, apart from early ones like Tillerson and Sessions, which weren't just bad, were almost uniformly disastrous.
Pompeo, Bolton (on orders from Adelson), Pence, Kushner, Ivanka peddling her knickers and jewellery, the list is long and undistinguished.
They ignored him and actively undermined him to promote their own agendas. Instead of just sacking them, or never appointing them
in the first place, Trump was reduced to whining and bleating about them on Twitter, like a latter day King Lear with the benefit
of modern technology. And even that consolation is no longer available to him.
Perhaps he would have done better with Bannon and Giuliani, however reptilian they may be.
No doubt a lot more will emerge about this distinctly non-organic event in the near future, to be dutifully ignored by the
MSM. They will seek above all to preserve the illusion of democracy to impress the simple minded.
Good analysis. Donald never brought in the strong new blood he needed, and said he would hire during the first campaign. Then
he sets up Ivanka and Jared as the power-couple of his admin, to rule over the WH.
This guy is supposed to be some genius and finding the right people and retaining them, but couldn't get that job done in his
own WH and admin.
lynette cracknell chaplin , Jan 8, 2021 10:20 PM Reply to
Jacob Paul
There is virtually no difference between the 2 American parties, they are both ruled by the muili billionaire oligarchy, but
the 75 million people who voted for Trump are mostly middle class God fearing and patriotic people who at long last saw Trump
as a president who represented them.
George Mc , Jan 8, 2021 4:37 PM
Disasters are always excellent opportunities for re-shaping in the most drastic ways. Hard won and long-time held protections
can be undone very easily under conveniently mutable "extreme situations". And any objections can be met with "Don't you know
there's a war/ crisis/ pandemic on?"
Edwige , Jan 8, 2021 4:17 PM
Biden's election win finally certified at . 3.33am.
exiled off mainstreet , Jan 8, 2021 6:22 PM Reply to
Edwige
That is funny. It is just about the same time the vans with forged ballots arrived simultaneously in various states where the
counting had "stopped' until the result could be remedied.
Paul Vonharnish , Jan 8, 2021 5:37 PM Reply to
Moneycircus
Hello Moneycircus: All planned by DNC players, and the planned purpose of the flag event:
"CONGRESS WAS HEARING OBJECTIONS TO THE ELECTION
PROTESTERS SHUT DOWN HEARING
Evidence of voter fraud was being submitted to the record – cancelled
Petitioning for a 10-day investigation – cancelled
Not expecting to overturn results but wanted to pursue process – cancelled
Goal was transparency – cancelled"
"Pathetic that the Republicrats (the criminal racket so corrupt it needs two aliases) have decided to descend to the level
of a rather bad soap opera before they take SHAM DEMOCRACY USA full Third Reich. Here is a thought, the WAR RACKETEER CORPORATE
FASCIST OLIGARCH MOBSTER OLIGARCHS should give back everything that they have stolen from WE THE PEOPLE (HUMANITY ). Then turn
themselves in to be held accountable for their many CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. The World will be a better and more peaceful place
after they do.
In case my fellow commenters think I'm a troll etc: Deleting that Trump video where he tell people to go home is a very alarming
act; there's def something fishy going on.
How is it alarming? Because they can censor any speech, no matter how seemingly innocuous? We know, thanks.
Social media corporations operate through government contracts and licenses, feeding all the data you input into secret files
on you and everyone on earth. They then profit by reselling that info without your consent or knowledge and by targeting you with
ads and disinfo, 24-7. They are not publishers, they are not social. They are spying networks that function as legal profiteering
entities directly partnering with corrupt governments, to manage their distracted ignorant populaces like chattering, mimetic
mind monkeys, by playing useless games of online telephone called "retweeting" which is just another word for re-dissemination.
Why do people want to be part of that mind control system? That's more worrying to me than a cabal spokesperson being faux
silenced.
Moneycircus , Jan 8, 2021 2:46 PM
Whitney Webb
:
"If one of these guys is an actor it's more likely they are paid provocateurs who go to rallies on the left and the right. That
does not mean they are Antifa or BLM. It's more likely they are on the FBI payroll.
"If you are Trump supporter you should be aware you are walking into a trap with this crap. If you are a critical thinker on
the left you should be freaked out that the crazy Biden administration is full of evil neocons like Victoria Nuland, who is back,
and they have control of the House and the Senate so they are going to ram through the most authoritarian, 6uild 6ack 6etter,
Great Reset imaginable We need to divert the path away from this clusterfuck that they are arming."
Researcher , Jan 8, 2021 3:54 PM Reply to
Moneycircus
They always have control of the House and the Senate because both parties work for the same side. Political parties have to
appear oppositional, otherwise the scam would be exposed for everyone to see.
Bob the Hod , Jan 8, 2021 4:41 PM Reply to
Researcher
While that is true to an extent, it isn't nearly that simple. There are individuals within those parties working against one
another and with one another, factions within factions pulling in different directions. There is subtlety and nuance within power
structures that is easily missed if you regard the whole thing as one homogenous blob. It is never, ever that simple. There are
out and out psychopaths there, there are decent people there, there is every shade in between. The system favours psychopaths,
that's for sure. The news that they try to feed us is nothing but theatre, but behind the scenes there is a lot that goes on that
we don't know about, human flaws and egos abound.
Shit certainly rises to the top, and backstabbing shit at that. Human history is littered with examples of it. We've got where
we are because psychopaths rule. Their main loyalty is to themselves. That's why the absurd horseshit espoused by Ayn Rand has
come to be mainstream political doctrine. It's always worth remembering that these apparently monolithic power structures are
built on the shoulders of inherently flawed individuals and they can and do collapse.
Paul Vonharnish , Jan 8, 2021 5:56 PM Reply to
Bob the Hod
Hello Bob the Hod: I agree with the notion that certain individuals within these organizations often uphold their own sense
of nuance and decency. Tulsi Gabbard would be an excellent example These persons are overridden by others who are more privy to
lobby/PAC interests and media attention
I totally disagree with your assessment of Ayn Rand. If you read her work "Atlas Shrugged", she is warning the audience against
the inherent collapse of systems which are corrupted by money, title, and "special" influence. The final chapters detail the dire
consequences quite well.
Researcher , Jan 8, 2021 6:28 PM Reply to
Bob the Hod
I don't agree. At all. Those individuals are there only to provide the illusion that there are individual views or beliefs
being proffered. Whatever power structures exist within those various groups is normal infighting that occurs within hierarchical
structures where people jockey for position based on personal objectives whether that be greed or narcissism. None of that infighting
is connected to the functionaries and system that controls policies or agendas because those are predetermined decades ahead.
If you step outside the system, you will be ousted. If you can't be immediately ousted, you will be taken out one way or another.
A scandal. A threat. An accident. A political challenger. Access and privileges rescinded. Donations dried up. Unanswered phone
calls and emails. Everybody knows this before they get into politics. The only reason they're there is to get in on the gravy
train.
Researcher , Jan 8, 2021 2:24 PM
The silencing and censoring is part of the faux drama. If social media can appear to censor the president, it justifies the
broader censoring already taking place. Countries already restrict which sites we are allowed visit or know exist through our
ISP's and our search results. The cyber pandemic and faux hacking is created to censor and restrict our access even more, which
will morph into approved words, approved sites, approved and monitored online activities.
The president has never once gone off script. Everything is staged. They stage "events" and script "narratives" to justify
the laws they already intend to pass that were written years ahead.
Voting doesn't matter. Governments are legal constructs that protect criminal racketeering. Nobody gets near the presidency
who isn't born into the club. The same goes for Prime Ministerial positions.
All sides work for the same people. They are in a club of criminals and psychopaths and there is no movement within that milieu.
Presidents have no agency. They are figureheads. Spokespeople for the criminal cartel.
Trump is a long time money launderer for the Rothschild-Rockefeller cartel. And a reality show actor on television.
Trump has no reason whatsoever to be deposed other than it was planned this way by the people who hired the Transition Integrity
Project to write the script to create the staged coup.
Very concisely (and accurately) put. It's all just staging, actors and scripts. Those who run the show have got it all sewn
up (and they have done for a very long time).
Donald Tute , Jan 8, 2021 2:17 PM
Trump looking weak, failed and dejected hides what could have been. It could have been scary and it could all have got very
out of control very quickly if his demands had have been met.
Aniesush , Jan 8, 2021 2:08 PM
Trump looking weak, failed and dejected hides what could have been. It could have been scary and it could have got very
out of control very quickly if his demands had have been met.
It was clear for anyone to see that Trump has been fishing for support for a coup over the past few months, but it never came
to anything. The military kept their powder Dry for reasons best known by them.
God only knows what calls were being made behind the scenes between politicians, the military and big tech during these past
few weeks, but in the end the coup failed. I suspect because the traditional power bases who might have gained from the overthrow
of this 'democracy' are already doing very well inside the corrupt system, So why overthrow it.
I totally disagree that the new fascist will be anti-fascists. Traditional fascists are still the real danger, despite your
many attempts to make them the heroes, and despite Trumps failure, are growing in influence every day as the CIA & groups like
you clears a path for them in the media, in parliament and in every day life.
"... Whatever pantomime is being played out – trump has to be part of it. There is simply no way his team would not have foreseen this. Just another distraction to keep the people fighting each other – and conveniently bring in the further restrictions we could all see coming. ..."
Is it not just as likely that this was staged by the Republicans and Democrats as a joint operation and managed by the CIA,
FBI infiltrators that would have been among the extreme Trump supporters from the beginning of his presidency.
Mitch McConnell and the 'sane' Republicans want shot of Trump. They don't want him going around the country for the next four
years rallying his supporters for a second shot at the presidency for himself or Jared. They want to get back to business as usual
and Biden will go along with them if they finish off Trump.
What better way than painting support of Trump being an attack on the constitution and its symbols, almost a sacred text and
icons for a large numbers of Americans. This way they cut away large swathes of his regular Republican support who see this as
crossing a line. Then start planning for the next election without the distraction of Trump.
You make a good point for why it might have been joint effort – thanks for that thought. I even wonder if Trump was part of
it as well. But to the Republican's detriment – we who supported Trump are as sick of the Repub traitors as the Democrats. Cotton,
Paul – shitheads. I think disguised antifa scum were the provocateurs here but hurray for all Patriots there that were emboldened
to enter on their heels. You should check out the Tiktok photo showing the Congress overrun. Good for them! Hell, there's nothing
in that building worth respecting anymore. The party system is corrupt beyond repair.
Serf , Jan 8, 2021 12:48 AM
That could well be a Rehearsal rather than an actual staging. The clue being, the number of casualties was kept at a very strict minimum. You might argue, the loss of prestige for this militaristic country is enormous, but that can be easily fixed by our skillful
Media.
4 killed, i would say, if I borrow from Obama's wisdom, this number is not worth talking about it.
Despair! , Jan 7, 2021 11:53 PM
Whatever pantomime is being played out – trump has to be part of it. There is simply no way his team would not have foreseen
this. Just another distraction to keep the people fighting each other – and conveniently bring in the further restrictions we
could all see coming.
What is there left to do. Accept our lot in life, the cycle of humanity. Reflect and look within – its not what I want materially
– spiritually maybe – but either way it feels that really is all we can do.
According to one of my US sources "ANTIFA members stormed our capital building. They dressed
as Trump supporters (I'll call them MAGA for short)." My source supplied this video which shows
MAGA supporters begging with Antifa actors to stop.
CONGRESS WAS HEARING OBJECTIONS TO THE ELECTION; PROTESTORS SHUT DOWN HEARING
Evidence of voter fraud was being submitted to the record – cancelled
Petitioning for a 10-day investigation – cancelled
Not expecting to overturn results but wanted to pursue process – cancelled
Goal was transparency – cancelled
TRUMP REALIZED THE ATTEMPT TO DISRUPT THE SITTING
Called on followers to "go home now. We have to have peace."
There is no incitement in any of his speeches – MSM is fake news.
Twitter deleted the Tweet. Big Tech did not want evidence Trump called for peace.
That disrupted the narrative that Trump was inciting riots.
POLITICS IS THE NEW HOLLYWOOD
David Corn: Donald Trump is now a Terrorist Leader
Rep David Trone: hysterical victim selfie in boy-in-bubble helmet.
BBC EMOTIVE LANGUAGE
Comparing headlines to video evidence is like two different worlds.
SUSPICIOUS DEATHS
Unarmed Air Force veteran was executed by a kill shot to head by plainclothes assassin.
Real story is unknown: to set an example. Was she a liability?
Gunman was roughly five feet behind her he could see she was unarmed.
She was a Trump supporter among a band of provocateurs.
MSM smeared her reputation, talked of domestic issues, painted her as "unstable woman."
No information on other four deaths. Left vague
Police officer also supposedly died after returning to his office.
ZUCKERBERG DELETE'S TRUMP'S FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM ACCOUNTS
JOINED TWITTER IN SHUTTING DOWN PRESIDENT
Here's the full post from Zuckerberg:
The shocking events of the last 24 hours clearly demonstrate that President Donald Trump
intends to use his remaining time in office to undermine the peaceful and lawful transition
of power to his elected successor, Joe Biden. His decision to use his platform to condone
rather than condemn the actions of his supporters at the Capitol building has rightly
disturbed people in the US and around the world. We removed these statements yesterday
because we judged that their effect -- and likely their intent -- would be to provoke
further violence.
Following the certification of the election results by Congress, the priority for the
whole country must now be to ensure that the remaining 13 days and the days after
inauguration pass peacefully and in accordance with established democratic norms.
Over the last several years, we have allowed President Trump to use our platform
consistent with our own rules, at times removing content or labeling his posts when they
violate our policies. We did this because we believe that the public has a right to the
broadest possible access to political speech, even controversial speech. But the current
context is now fundamentally different, involving use of our platform to incite violent
insurrection against a democratically elected government.
We believe the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during
this period are simply too great. Therefore, we are extending the block we have placed on
his Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the next two weeks until
the peaceful transition of power is complete.
What Zuckerberg asserts this is his media communication channel. You are privileged to use
it even if you are the democratically elected president of the U.S. We shall decide if you
communicate with the public.
Zuckerberg labels this violent insurrection yet the only violence was from the police.
This is hugely partisan and anything but objective.
Patrick Henningsen: The U.S. has never before used this wording "the peaceful transition
of power" -- it was a transfer of elected governments. In this new class of politicians it is
only about power. We are entering a post-democratic society.
Mark Zuckerberg and spouse Priscilla Chan spend $400 million in the key six swing states
to impose Dominion Voting Systems and to pay pollsters to influence voters in those same
states.
FACT CHECKERS ASSERT WITHOUT CHECKING
Reuters, USA Today, Fact Check -- all insist members of Antifa were not identified in the
Capitol by facial recognition using random insertion of "recognition" to glaze over the
narrative. They had not spent any time investigating these individuals: it was all
assertion.
DEMENTIA JOE CONDEMNS DOMESTIC TERRORISTS
"They were not protestors"
By denying civil disobedience he effectively condones a coup d'etat.
Crowd changed for people not to break windows, not to storm Capitol.
Attacks assault on the citadel of American liberty.
Joe Biden slurred his speech throughout. The man is barely lucid.
GEORGE FLOYD PROTESTS PUT WHITE HOUSE ON LOCKDOWN
In June 2020, mobs burned White House church, tried to breach security
Joe Biden had nothing to say.
Democrats supported these actions when they didn't control government.
LUSTRATION – SHUTTING OUT RIVAL PARTIES
Patrick Henningsen: Democrats are calling for GOP to be broken up.
"Hold anyone linked to Trump accountable." – Hari Sevugan
"Draw up lists and hold them accountable" – AOC
Remove Congressmen who challenged election results
Simon & Schuster cancelled Josh Hawley's book contract.
This is a policy used in Ukraine after the coup to shut out parties that the new ruling
clique did not like.
GUARDIANS OF DEMOCRACY CRITICIZE U.S.
ATTACK PEOPLE DEFENDING ELECTION INTEGRITY
Charles Michel – EU Council President (unelected)
Jans Stoltenberg – NATO Sec Gen (unelected)
Jacinta Ardern – NZ PM (authoritr*ns)
Nicola Sturgeon – Scotland PM (authoril*z)
Sociopathy toward the majority seems to be relevant.
BLM activist identified in mob that stormed Capitol, present at veteran's killing, later
detained by DC police
"One of the men who was part of the siege of the Capitol building is John Earle Sullivan,
an extreme BLM activist from Utah. He was arrested & charged in July 2020 over a
BLM-antifa riot where drivers in Provo were threatened & one was shot." -- Andy Ngo
Sullivan was one of those filming US Air Force Veteran, Ashli Babbitt, as she was shot
dead. Babbitt seems to have entered the Capitol on the coattails of a group of provocateurs,
perhaps not realizing that she was the odd one out.
The prominent BLM activist said he was not at the Capitol as part of the protest but did
not specify what exactly brought him there. Sullivan said he was able to get inside through a
broken window.
Moneycircus , Jan 8, 2021 5:12 AM Reply to
Moneycircus
"Interviewed last night by Anderson Cooper, who never asked this fellow why he was in the
Capitol. "Two people who saw the shooting, left-wing activist John Sullivan and documentary
filmmaker Jade Sacker, provided CNN with video of the incident and described the moment." --
Alan
Burks
I pulled Göering aside; but he did not let me start. 'Police on an emergency
footing; shoot to kill; and any other emergency regulations which might be appropriate in
such a case.' I said again that a police radio message would be sent to all police stations
in his name, putting the police in a state of alert and ordering the arrest of those
Communist officials whose imprisonment had been intended for some time in the event of a ban
on the Party. Göering was not listening: 'No Communist and no Social Democrat traitor
must be allowed to escape us' were his last words.
When I met Schneider again I tried to collect my thoughts: 'This is a mad-house,
Schneider, but apart from that the time has come: all Communist and Social Democrat officials
are to be arrested, big raids, a state of alert and all that goes with it!'
Schneider forgot the Social Democrats when he passed on Göering's order as a radio
message. When I returned to the 'Alex' after midnight it was buzzing like a beehive. The
alerted operational battalions of the police stood lined up in long rows in the entrance
drives with steel helmets and rifles. While squad vans arrived and whole troops of detectives
with registers prepared many years before jumped on the ramps, joined by uniformed officers,
the first cars were arriving back at the entrance of the building with dazed prisoners who
had been woken up from their sleep.
Different topic but, this is good. Normally, I'm too impatient for videos however, this
former CIA station chief does a great job explaining how the electronic election theft
flowed.
"... Monitors, equipped with distinguishing "uniforms", bullhorns and an array of communications devices, along with a set of security personnel, should have been front and center at the capitol to make sure that agents provocateurs, contract hired by the intel agencies of the Deep $tate, would not be able to fool a number of genuine Trump supporters into entering the building at the behest of these highly organized and ultimately protected Cointelpro types. ..."
Was Trump for real, or was he an actor following a predetermined script? There were many
occasions where he could have used the presidential powers to disarm the corporate state,
the deep state and even the ruling banksters. Yet he did not act. Perhaps the most telling
of all his "failures" was the fact that he called a rally in the Di$trict of Corruption
without setting up an organization (or even having one) that would have been specifically
instructed to make certain there would be no "riotous" disruptions in the process.
Monitors, equipped with distinguishing "uniforms", bullhorns and an array of
communications devices, along with a set of security personnel, should have been front and
center at the capitol to make sure that agents provocateurs, contract hired by the intel
agencies of the Deep $tate, would not be able to fool a number of genuine Trump supporters
into entering the building at the behest of these highly organized and ultimately protected
Cointelpro types.
It was a setup, folks. That should be obvious to any informed observer. Did Trump play a
role, whether passive or active, in creating the media spectacle which is now being used to
once again convince the terminally deluded boobtoob noose addicts that the Kamala's Foote
and Biden nominees were the "good guys" who actually won the election fair and square and
that the bedizened patriots who showed up in DC in huge numbers were actually the foes of
"democracy"?
@Majority of
One ut the Insurrection Act and how he should have used this or that presidential power,
but unfortunately he didn't know enough about what he COULD do. I'm sure he had lousy
counsel. He was surrounded by people like Mitch McConnell and Newt Gingrich who would have
strung Trump along, saying, "No, you can't do that, we are a democracy," etc. Blah, blah,
blah.
Hard to govern when you're surrounded with knives. The White House should be called "The
House of Knives".
But Trump did do something very important. He awakened the country to what's really going
on. I don't see that as failure. The elite don't either; that's why they're fighting him so
hard.
What people do not understand, is that he was screwed before he got the nomination.
Republican Inc. would have fixed the convention to deprive him of the nomination, had he not
agreed to take Pence and Priebus.
Maarten "merethan" , Jan 8, 2021 11:43 AM Reply to
Leo Washington
Election fraud is more of a tradition than incident. Remember how we used to joke about
"This presidency is brought to you by Diebold"? That was around the 2000's referring to Bush
Jr., and Diebold is the vote machine manufacturer. That's just 20 years ago mate.
Calling election fraud a hilarious idea shows a good lack of historical perspective.
Yeah, fair enough. Can we see some proof of this election fraud, then? And by 'proof', I
don't mean 'someone said'. Because I can't help thinking that if there had been any proof,
then every single 'lawsuit' would not have been laughed out of court. Or are the judges
involved in this massive left-wing conspiracy, too? Jan 8, 2021 7:27 PM Reply to
Leo Washington
Proof is all the problem: There's no proof of a fair election either. The current system
was, in the old days, the only way to ensure votes were anonymous which is a requirement for
having everyone express their true beliefs and allegiances, absent of any group pressure.
I'm all for enhancing this with cryptographic signatures and a public ledger. Such that
everyone can validate their own vote and totals but not the one made by their spouse or
neighbor specifically.
That would bring us a lot closer to the proof you are asking for, because right now we got
none in either direction. Other than the media saying so and twitter banning you for daring
to post any questions.
Two trailing democract candidates brought to the lead at the same time and in the same
proprtion by mail-in votes that are 100% democrat – what are the odds? (~0% in a
straight election, ~100% in a bent election).
I would have the same view if the R and D attributions were reversed. The election was
fixed.
The main point is that the fraud is so evident. Multiple witnesses. Examination of two
machines. Not just a smoking gun with no witnesses. The government is too afraid to confront
it out of fear of backlash. The backlash from not doing anything will be worse. Democrats
keep wanting to unify now that Trump is out. They have done nothing but hinder him and our
country because of lies being levied against him. No doubt the man has flaws but that is not
justification for what they did during his presidency. And now the evidence of the steal.
Combine that with trying to remove him to keep him from running again The shit just keeps
getting deeper and deeper while they beg for unity. All of the sudden mayors across the
country are vowing to bring back law and order now that Trump is out. I could go on and on. I
cannot express how deeply the anger goes and it is not getting any better as Democratic
leaders continue with derogatory statements all of which are lies. This is classic bullying
and kicking someone who is down. It is truly a recipe for disaster.
A lawyer for Dominion held a press conference on Friday claiming that claims that the
allegations against them are "false."
"These false allegations have caused catastrophic damage to this company. They have
branded Dominion, a voting company, as perpetrating a massive fraud," Tom Clare, the attorney
representing Dominion, said in a press conference over Zoom. "Those allegations triggered a
media firestorm that promoted those same false claims to a global audience. They've made the
company radioactive and destroyed the value of its once thriving business and has put
Dominion's multiyear contracts in jeopardy."
Smartmatic has also said that they will be filing lawsuits against people who questioned
their technology and the "media outlets that gave them a platform."
To win the lawsuit, Dominion must prove that Powell was acting in "actual malice," and not
sincere belief that they helped to rig the election against the president.
I read the filing and THIS looks like read trouble for Powell. Unlike her incoherent
filings, Dominion methodically rips apart Powell's false claims and more importantly
establishes a timeline showing malicious intent which is the key in defamation. They show how
she knowingly repeated falsehoods when it would benefit her financially.
@SolontoCroesus
exercise -- [is] a man by the name of Norm Eisen. . . .
". . .a key architect of nearly every attempt to delegitimize, impeach, censor, sue and
remove the democratically elected 45th President of the United States – is a tale that
winds through nearly every facet of the color revolution playbook. There is no purer
embodiment of Revolver's thesis that the very same regime change professionals who run Color
Revolutions on behalf of the US Government in order to undermine or overthrow alleged
"authoritarian" governments overseas, are running the very same playbook to overturn Trump's
2016 victory and to pre-empt a repeat in 2020. "
@Nisbe hey
made out okay rail about the elite now that they've been given the bum's rush as a function
of the global speculative rentier economy.
Your closing emission encapsulates the deluded mentality of Drumpfers.
I'll grant that Trump Derangement Syndrom is real, but that was the whole point of Drumpf.
He's such an odious cretin that sentiment replaced all reason in a US electorate that exists
on a political spectrum running from the right to the far-right, with ginned-up "moral"
issues creating the divide, rather than quarelling over the dominance of economic equality or
economic freedom in society.
Does it matter that a few people know what the score is? It's nearly fifty years since
Operation Nickel Grass, when the US flew A-4 and F-4 aircraft right to Israel to shore up the
colonial project, along with C-5 loads of TOW missiles, M60 tanks, etc., and people still
think there is a representative democracy in the US.
These people were invited into the Capitol, most of them had no idea what the legal
ramifications of this would be. They were angry and they were in a frenzy. It was total mob
psychology, something that we understand well. None of them had bad intentions – which we
know, because there wasn't even any vandalism, let alone violence against people.
And now they're being accused of being seditionists. And apparently, the president is going
to leave them in the lurch.
One of first broadcasters who instantly sensed that this was a false flag operation
Notable quotes:
"... Also, like we are supposed to believe, with protests outside there is only ONE security officer blocking them with a baton going up the stairs INSIDE the CAPITAL. Suuuuuuuure. Anyone that believes that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I would like to sell them. ..."
Also, like we are supposed to believe, with protests outside there is only ONE security officer blocking them with a baton
going up the stairs INSIDE the CAPITAL. Suuuuuuuure. Anyone that believes that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I would like to sell
them.
DO you really think Biden will get anywhere near the power buttons?? never never happen - the horned guy is a MARINE WHITE
HAT BTW - do a bit more research and update this post -
This is German language site. Google translation of selected comments follows.
Notable quotes:
"... Always ask: to whom does it benefit? Can protesters really enter the Capitol without anyone wanting to? Look at the behavior of the "security forces"! ..."
"... False Flags have a long tradition in America. ..."
"... In the opening scene, the friendly security forces "forget" the meaning of the barrier. An Actor, completely untroubled behind the police, wants to animate Trump Fans and Furrows wildly, they may finally run. Quite unusual for marauding gangs planning the" storm "or" coup". But prefer to be pretty sweet with police officers. Not to mention the Wanted film scenes in the Capitol. ..."
Always ask: to whom does it benefit? Can protesters really enter the Capitol without
anyone wanting to? Look at the behavior of the "security forces"!
Captain, 16 hours ago
Of course.. this was a copy of the Storming of the Reichstag steps
Emma Pol, 17 hours ago
The constructors will always tell the media-listening masses: there is a dangerous Mob out
there that wants to abolish the Liberal basic order. They will do it in the way of truth
reversal...
Collect images against political dissenters and use them later for their own purposes..perfidious reversal devised by well-paid think tanks, who work from morning to
night only to destroy the opponent and thus democracy...
Ibiza Video also planned by langer
Hsnd and used at useful time....they also know they can't deceive everyone, but most of the
crowd believes the hoax
Dio, 17 hours ago
The Plan is to create absolute Kaos in order to get around the corner with a false world
peace (after which everyone should sigh). People will then accept things that they would not
have accepted before.
Dante, 16 hours ago
False Flags have a long tradition in America.
Info Scout, 16 hours ago (edited)
In the opening scene, the friendly security forces "forget" the meaning of the barrier. An
Actor, completely untroubled behind the police, wants to animate Trump Fans and Furrows
wildly, they may finally run. Quite unusual for marauding gangs planning the" storm "or"
coup". But prefer to be pretty sweet with police officers. Not to mention the Wanted film
scenes in the Capitol.
A president surrounded by puppeteers and swamp creatures who have dropped their mask.
Liam v. d. W., 17 hours ago
That's how easy it is to storm one of the safest buildings in the world ....
Rico S, 15 hours ago (edited)
Of course, a False Flag as with every "color Revolution" and every other war so far.
Only probalm is that voluntarily these deep-State criminals will never clear the field.
a shag, 16 hours ago
Steep These? Completely understandable and probable. Recognize patterns and connect
dots.
Rainhard, 16 hours ago
Yes, the Western "democracies" are appalled. Well, then take your populations seriously
and not just those who speak to you. This happens when the" pressure " in the boiler
discharges. Be happy if there is no 1989 Romanian Nicolae Ceaușescu "solution"!
Ralf Schmidt, 15 hours ago (edited)
When it comes to Jo Biden,the following names come to Mind:Hunter Biden, Victoria
Nuland.........Does that ring a bell?
Keyword: Ukraine/Eastern Ukraine! It seems to me that some important persons are to be put
in "position"......! Mir schwant so much! Let's see who else emerges so everything from the
sink!
Red Pill German, 14 hours ago
Reichstag was the test run...
Sybille Kühn, 11 hours ago
An obviously staged spectacle!! If our Public reports in the media about something
indignant, everyone can draw his conclusions
ks coco, 16 hours ago
Nothing is as it seems...
Poorly incised acting, slowly let down in the quality of Incination (I only say September 11
that I had still believed) Once again a diversionary maneuver to distract from the problems
and the Installation here as well as worldwide and then to pronounce martial law. We enter a
new Level in their perfidious game with humanity...
I am curious if you use the Project Blue Beam. Mentally one is already prepared for it on
the net on some channels... The Messiah, etc., will come and bring salvation... People don't
fall for it and don't let it drive you crazy.
Use your life energy for yourself and your fellow human beings and try to survive the
crisis, because every system has its gaps and currently too little has woken up to stop it.
Nothing is as it seems...
Michael Kohler, 7 hours ago
My feeling also says. False Flag. Staged. Like almost everything they show us. The
Satanists world takeover gang at their work.
Cancel that bacta, Commando, 11 hours ago
In the end, an intelligence service can manipulate everything possible, infiltrate whole
political movements or even recreate them, no matter which movement you belong to there is
usually the risk that you do not know for whom you are active or which goal is actually
achieved with any actions. I think but some things are not disputable about events eg the
amount of people that was in D.C., as well as the amount that was in Berlin. So it is already
bubbling, but the question whether there was anything manipulated can answer no normal
mortal, even people in leadership of movements or parties are never safe from insidiousness
or informed about everything.
Hammer 2020, 16 hours ago (edited)
The same as in August last year...I was in Berlin.....we never keep this......none of our
people was there with possibly one or the other thought it was real....all set by our
government to manipulate the people who still believe in everything the government tells us!
Never would a storming of the Bundestag / Reichstag building have gone so smoothly with 3
Federal Police without equipment.....
The doors also had not been breached on the Capitol steps when they were evacuating the
chamber. Kept saying it's been breached but the doors were still shut well after they were
evacuated meaning the ones they guarded as they led them in were absolutely staged.
It was the Capital Police that shot her. The CP has federal jurisdiction and are immune.
Look it up. Biden was certified. I knew he would be. Nothing in government happens by
accident.
"... Several others have latched onto the false-flag narrative, including Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, televangelist and Trump surrogate Pastor Mark Burns, and Fox News political analyst Brit Hume, as well as some popular QAnon promoters with large Twitter followings. Franklin Graham, a leading Trump supporter among evangelicals, also raised the specter of antifa, without evidence. ..."
"... Zack Vorhies, a self-described former YouTube and Google engineer turned whistleblower... posted an interview with a man outside the Capitol who claims to have overheard antifa activists "dressed as Trump supporters" discussing how to make Trump fans look bad before smashing a window. The video had received over 100,000 views in just four hours. ..."
One of the first to push this narrative was Rep. Mo Brooks, an Alabama Republican and part of a small group of Trump loyalists
who'd pledged to challenge the Electoral College results from several states during Wednesday's joint session of Congress in an ill-fated
final attempt to undo Trump's defeat. "Rumor: ANTIFA fascists in backwards MAGA hats,"
Brooks tweeted from the locked-down Capitol
where he was taking cover from the mob. "Time will tell what truth is."
Yet it was
Brooks himself, addressing Trump supporters at the rally that morning, who had dramatically removed his camouflage cap and replaced
it with a bright red one emblazoned with the words "Fire Pelosi" and urged fellow Republicans in Congress to back the effort to overturn
the election results, declaring, "Today is the day American patriots start taking down names and kicking ass."
When the House eventually reconvened Wednesday evening, one of those colleagues, the firebrand Florida Republican Matt Gaetz,
declared on the floor that he had seen "some pretty compelling evidence from a facial-recognition company showing that some of the
people who breached the Capitol today were not Trump supporters, they were masquerading as Trump supporters, and in fact were members
of the violent terrorist group antifa."
Lawyer and Trump ally Lin Wood, who has become a devout proponent of the president's baseless and conspiratorial voter fraud allegations,
tweeted out several pixelated photos and screenshots Wednesday afternoon that he touted as proof that "Trump supporters are peaceful"
and antifa was responsible for storming the U.S. Capitol. One particularly egregious example featured an edited split screen of two
images which he described as "Indisputable photographic evidence that antifa violently broke into Congress today to inflict harm
& do damage. NOT @realDonaldTrump supporters."
In one photo is a man who had already been widely identified as Jake Angeli...
... ... ...
Several others have latched onto the false-flag narrative, including Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, televangelist and Trump
surrogate Pastor Mark Burns, and Fox News political analyst Brit Hume, as well as some popular QAnon promoters with large Twitter
followings. Franklin Graham, a leading Trump supporter among evangelicals, also raised the specter of antifa, without evidence.
Zack Vorhies, a self-described former YouTube and Google engineer turned whistleblower... posted an interview with a man outside
the Capitol who claims to have overheard antifa activists "dressed as Trump supporters" discussing how to make Trump fans look bad
before smashing a window. The video had received over 100,000 views in just four hours.
"... It is almost as if the Deep State vampire squid would prefer to bring the Republic that threatens it to 3rd world status in order to protect the oligarchy. ..."
"... If it's any consolation, they have probably tinkered with the voting machines already. Only problem is if different agencies back different candidates! I'd be astounded if they let themselves be caught off guard like they did in 2016, particularly since Biden has to be one of their assets. ..."
"... "The corporate Democrats think they can contain progressive forces; the Trump Republicans believe they should be crushed. ..."
"... Democrats are so cute. First you had your divisive resistance in 2016, but the divisiveness wasn't your fault. Then you moved on to Russia, Russia, Russia. I get the Clinton machine and bipartisan cronies had unfinished business in the raping of post Soviet Russia. Damn that Putin for demanding legitimate tax payment. I always thought you guys loved taxing the rich. ..."
"... Heck, they might even be the secret owners of many of these voting machine manufacturers. ..."
"... In addition, we know that some intelligence services went for Hillary in 2016–former CIA Director Mike Morrell helped kick off RussiaGate with an op-Ed in 2016. CIA Director John Brennan led the interagency charge against Trump's unproven collusion. Now Trump has vowed to make a lot of heads roll if he wins. ..."
"... There is no "left" in America, including BLM and antifa brownshirts blackshirts, so no aspersions that I may cast can land upon real leftists. The US political spectrum starts somewhere around "Baby Doc" Duvalier on the left and goes downhill from there. ..."
It is almost as if the Deep State vampire squid would prefer to bring the Republic that threatens it to 3rd world status in order
to protect the oligarchy.
Voting in the U.S. is manipulated at all levels. Fortunately the results probably don't matter due to the financial stranglehold
on politics so, except for the those employed by the political candidates, it isn't worth losing sleep over. But if there was a functional
government in place then it would be a big deal.
The truth is that the facade of the Democrats is falling while the Republican brand has not changed very much in a long time.
Democratic support is an all time low and it is getting harder and harder to spin that brand to a society which is not stupid enough
to believe everything anymore, especially in the face of two consecutive Presidential elections rife with internal DNC corruption.
The donors really just want the electorate divided, so any real vote manipulation is inconsequential in the scheme of things if
all policy trends in the direction of finance and that sort of thing.
I predict you will see more scandal and spectacle over elections on television and every issue will have its emotional appeal
magnified to try and bolster support for a feckless Left, while policy continues to feel like it was written by Count Dracula. Ultimately,
violence will be stoked by news media in this subtle way until the "violent left" is used as an excuse to enact law and order policies
aimed at shutting down protests of all types.
Yes, that's exactly their plan. They use the government to wage war on the nation and gorge themselves on the ever increasing
debt load citizens must carry just to keep their standard of living at a 1970 level while privatizing as many assets as possible.
What percentage of protesters are in the streets because of the ongoing Class War is unknown. Regardless the winner, I expect protests
to continue.
Josh@32said: "My honest hope is that the more or less responsible elements of military, security, and intelligence, will keep
things from getting out of hand,"
If it's any consolation, they have probably tinkered with the voting machines already. Only problem is if different agencies back
different candidates! I'd be astounded if they let themselves be caught off guard like they did in 2016, particularly since Biden
has to be one of their assets.
Upthread, I linked to the Paul Jay podcast with Michael Hudson.
Here's the essay
he penned that's rather well done. Try this:
"The corporate Democrats think they can contain progressive forces; the Trump Republicans believe they should be crushed.
"This election isn't just about choosing the lesser evil; it's about choosing a more advantageous field upon which to wage
battle . Without creating illusions about who Biden represents, the Left should vote for him for President and support progressives
in down-ballot races.
"Trump needs to lose, and he needs to lose big." [My Emphasis]
I agree with the bolded point and others made by Jay as well as his analysis of our overall condition:
"While the far-right form of fascism is exceptionally dangerous, it has developed within an 'acceptable' form of fascism that's
been evolving for decades right before our eyes."
That's it for the distractions I'll be providing--a lecture, a podcast, and an analytical essay.
"Antiquated, seriously flawed and vulnerable to failure, breach, contamination and attack," U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg
wrote of Georgia's aging DRE system before ordering the state to replace it in 2019... Georgia's replacement system for DREs had
been rejected by Texas and is the subject of a court battle over accuracy." https://news.yahoo.com/news/ballot-safe-computer-experts-sound-100129923.html
IMO if Trump wins, it means that the intelligence services have got him under control.
Democrats are so cute. First you had your divisive resistance in 2016, but the divisiveness wasn't your fault. Then you moved
on to Russia, Russia, Russia. I get the Clinton machine and bipartisan cronies had unfinished business in the raping of post Soviet
Russia. Damn that Putin for demanding legitimate tax payment. I always thought you guys loved taxing the rich.
Guess not, but the
bigger question are you getting any kickback from the global predatory crony system? Probably not. Now it is Trump won't leave. He
will. Trump will suppress the vote. No he wants a big turnout. Here in PA our dear AG Josh Shapiro has said a couple days ago that
Biden has the early votes to win the state. Kinda sounds like Josh plans on suppressing election day voting...no? Why can't you just
win the vote with your positions? Why can't you accept when people don't like your positions? More importantly when did you decide
to hate working class people, especially the white ones? They use to be your base. Everyone please stay safe from the deep state's
planned insanity.
Gruff@71: The problem is that you have a perfect situation: undercover services and a secret activity with no auditing possible
in many cases. I'm sure that the intelligence services understand full well what the margin of error is, and know how to work within
it in the places where it can tip the balance.
Heck, they might even be the secret owners of many of these voting machine manufacturers.
In addition, we know that some intelligence services went for Hillary in 2016–former CIA Director Mike Morrell helped kick off
RussiaGate with an op-Ed in 2016. CIA Director John Brennan led the interagency charge against Trump's unproven collusion. Now Trump
has vowed to make a lot of heads roll if he wins.
Lots of motivation and lots of secret tools, along with a perfect opportunity...
They don't have any positions! They are the [neoliberal] Democratic Party, therefore entitled to rule America forever. What support
they have is from the Looney Left who, spoiled by winning every issue in the culture war, will throw a temper tantrum any time they
don't get their way. Because they get there way practically all the time, they freak out if you just look at them the wrong way.
No wonder we've had a 4 year meltdown since Trump appeared on the scene. And they'll double down on their hissy fit as we begin another
4 years.
Funny, I used to be left leaning. Certainly could find common ground with Liberals on many issues. Now all you get from the activists
and the left wing media is a monotonous virtual signal.
There is no "left" in America, including BLM and antifa brownshirts blackshirts, so no aspersions that
I may cast can land upon real leftists. The US political spectrum starts somewhere around "Baby Doc" Duvalier on the left
and goes downhill from there.
The ACLED organization that you linked only aggregates data from the corporate mass media, so all it can do is concentrate existing
bias and disinformation that big business is feeding to the public.
Please note that there is not a single 'leftist' corporate mass media organization in existence on the entire planet Earth.
In fact, big business is the antithesis of the left.
How do you think a "Peaceful but fiery" riot is categorized by the corporate mass media? Hint: You don't have to guess
because the answer is right in the quote. This is the data that ACLED is working with, and it happens to not support the assumptions
that you are working from.
But you are correct that the corporate mass media (and capitalist financed NGOs like ACLED) have division of the population into
mutually antagonistic groups as their objective. Where you lose the scent is in thinking that the groups you imagine to be on the
side of light are immune to that manipulation. On the contrary, these groups are created by that manipulation.
Posted by: William Gruff | Nov 4 2020 2:09 utc |
137
"Why all this fuzz? The difference between the two major parties is slim. Whoever wins will be constrained in his policies to
fit the general imperial trends the U.S. follows. "
Yes this is right. But who is setting the agenda of "the general imperial trends the U.S. follows" ? Who are these actors that "the US follows" ? ________
Pepe had this pearl in the article he published yesterday : "Big Capital – from East and West – is very much in tune with where all
of this is going". This answers the question " Who are these actors that "the US follows" ? "
But the problem is that it is difficult to identify who these "big capital holders" are. Too often the academic world loses itself in the surface appearances. In the case of studies about power by academics I wrote the
following in 2018 in "A growing disconnect between East
and West" (in 8.3.1.Global capital or control by the biggest Western capital holders) :
" The Swiss Federal Institute published a
study in
2011 that analyzed the different forms of ownership between 43,060 trans-national corporations (TNCs). The team of researchers
found that some 1,318 companies form the core of the global economy while 147 control 40% of their total wealth. What's more the
top 25 among these 147 are the world's top asset management firms. These 25 can "be thought of as an economic 'super-entity' in the
global network of corporations".
By pointing to the role of asset management firms as the real decision makers, the authors of the Swiss Federal Institute are
hiding the role of the minority, among capital holders, that owns the controlling stake of the world's total capital base. The owners,
of the assets played by asset management firms, are indeed hidden. Furthermore their investments outside of those asset management
firms are invisible in the study.
But there is no escaping the fact that the ownership, of the controlling stake of the world's total capital base, procures its
holders with 'the ownership' of the Great Game of Power. "
In his study titled "
Giants
" Peter Phillips further states that some 66% of the world's wealth is owned by EU and US capital holders! This shows how the weight,
of past capital accumulation, is still weighing very heavily on the present reality...
So we are in a situation where we know for a fact that -- big capital exists and is represented by a few families -- big capital
owns the Western decision making process -- but we can't put family names on what is "big capital" because those family names are
hidden by the world's top asset management firms...
What does this imply in terms of Geo-political security ?
I venture to suggest that -- in the short term we'll see Western big capital imposing a quietening of the tone in the public discourses
of its servants' -- within a few short years Western big capital and Chinese state capital will eventually find a 'modus operandi'
-- that 'modus operandi' will initially be managed within Regional Economic Blocks and then the interactions between blocks will
generate a new global architecture in which East-Asia will be dominant.
Today's "governance-world", or "Geo-politics", is driven by the competition between "Western big capital holders" and "China's
state capital". But this never appears front page in the mainstream media because, while deciding for the world, Western big capital
holders want to remain hidden. And so the Western media shows us the "surface appearance" of Western power but political decision-makers,
and the rest of the Western establishment, are merely the servants of "Western big capital". Elections are thus merely a show to
blind the peasants.
The shit show of Western governance of these last few years is now concluding with a new "governance-world" reality that can be
summed up as follows :
2.1. the Western Geo-political architecture imposed on the world after 1945 has been dynamited by Trump and there is no going
back to this architecture. China is confirming this with its "dual circulation" concept while it is reaffirming the priority of state
owned enterprises in the Chinese economy (see the last public humiliation of Jack Ma and Aunt financial).
2.2. the only remaining semblance of Int'l order today is found in the Regional Economic Blocks [ North-America, South-America,
EU, African Union, Eurasian Economic Union, East-Asia (ASEAN, Chinese civilizational space, North-East Asia), ... ].
Over the following years these blocks are going to go into overdrive trying to strengthen their internal institutional build-up
while also trying to coordinate their activities with neighboring blocs. The China-Russia entente has to be analyzed in this particular
context to discover what is really going on... and check how the US is trying to destabilize this great game of the century (India,
Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Turkey, ...) and India will rapidly have to adjust to this reality otherwise it will be marginalized
in the Great Game of Power of the Century.
It should be painfully obvious by now that the goal of electoral politics in the US - by those who manage it - is to maintain
a balance of power between two revolutionary extremes. Of course, balances of power never last forever. It may be instructive to
look at the fate of the Concert of Europe , which collapsed
when its primary beneficiary (the British Empire) no longer saw it as useful.
Comparisons to professional wrestling are often made as well. It's important to keep in mind the goal of professional wrestling,
which is to make as much money as possible. It's a business, after all. There are certain "angles" - narratives - that are marketed,
but they don't always work out as expected. Sometimes the audience boos at the face and cheers for the heel. What happens then? A
new angle, more favorable to the audience, is adopted. The show must go on.
In both 2016 and this year, Trump has either been trying to play the heel or at least is being used as the heel. Why would that
be? To diminish and defuse the revolutionary "right". The revolutionary "left" is hardly any threat these days. Smashing storefront
windows and setting police cars on fire does not a revolution make. On the other hand, the revolutionary "right" routinely organizes
itself into heavily armed militias. And there's been brewing opposition in the military, mainly from the "right", against the establishment's
foreign-policy objectives. It would seem, then, that the "right" is the bigger threat than the "left" these days - to the establishment.
Whether Trump leaves office next year or in 2025, if he's not prosecuted for anything afterwards (notwithstanding pardoning himself),
then one can only conclude that he was a part of the kayfabe from the beginning. But to paraphrase his one-time opponent, what difference
does it really make?
It should be painfully obvious by now that the goal of electoral politics in the US - by those who manage it - is to maintain
a balance of power between two revolutionary extremes. Of course, balances of power never last forever. It may be instructive to
look at the fate of the Concert of Europe , which collapsed
when its primary beneficiary (the British Empire) no longer saw it as useful.
Comparisons to professional wrestling are often made as well. It's important to keep in mind the goal of professional wrestling,
which is to make as much money as possible. It's a business, after all. There are certain "angles" - narratives - that are marketed,
but they don't always work out as expected. Sometimes the audience boos at the face and cheers for the heel. What happens then? A
new angle, more favorable to the audience, is adopted. The show must go on.
In both 2016 and this year, Trump has either been trying to play the heel or at least is being used as the heel. Why would that
be? To diminish and defuse the revolutionary "right". The revolutionary "left" is hardly any threat these days. Smashing storefront
windows and setting police cars on fire does not a revolution make. On the other hand, the revolutionary "right" routinely organizes
itself into heavily armed militias. And there's been brewing opposition in the military, mainly from the "right", against the establishment's
foreign-policy objectives. It would seem, then, that the "right" is the bigger threat than the "left" these days - to the establishment.
Whether Trump leaves office next year or in 2025, if he's not prosecuted for anything afterwards (notwithstanding pardoning himself),
then one can only conclude that he was a part of the kayfabe from the beginning. But to paraphrase his one-time opponent, what difference
does it really make?
"Biden: "No one can tell me that if it had been a group of Black Lives Matter protesting
yesterday, they wouldn't have been treated very, very differently than the mob of thugs that
stormed the Capitol. We all know that's true, and it is unacceptable. Totally unacceptable.""
foxnews
--------------
Varney commented today on his show that the US is moving rapidly toward an environment in
which deviant opinions and the expression of such will be punished by ostracism, loss of
employment and ultimately - what?
75 million dissidents voted for Trump. Their party actually grew stronger down ballot, much
stronger. These Smelly dissidents are heavily armed. Gun sales are way up. Ammunition is hard
to come by because of heavy buying.
President Joe and his "consort" think that the attitudes of the Smellies are "totally
unacceptable?"
He should be very careful about condemning the mind set of the Smellies, very careful. The
Dems think that they can extrapolate from the hooligans who broke into the capitol to the
general attitudes of the Smelly Deplorables?
At the 11th hour of the Obama administration, they were holding secret meeting plotting how
to destroy Trump, while Samantha Powers was demanding hundreds of FISA unmasking orders that
served absolutely no known purpose that late in the game.
Obama brought down America in secret, and did far more damage than this momentary street
theater takeover of the Capitol Building two days ago, curiously facilitated by the Capitol
Police union members. Obama's theft of America was slow and steady and did not let up one
minute during Trump's four long years under constant Democrat siege.
The Obama and Democrats dual systems of justice is what cannot stand. The seeds of
insurrection were sown in the 11th hours of the Obama administration; not the final hours of
the Trump administration.
This is just the beginning of cancel culture. Note that Trump has been cancelled by Facebook
& Twitter. Obama's IRS went after conservatives, is another example. This is not just about
the Democrats and their urban managerial class cohorts. The GOP establishment is part &
parcel of this alignment and very much a part of the benefits system. They will be even more
brazen in further accelerating market concentration to the benefit of the oligarchy. The past 4
years were just an aberration in their eyes. They've taken Trump down hard as an example to not
challenge their authority. Using George Bush's maxim - either you're with us or against us -
that's gonna be the attitude.
The next leader who will harness the frustration of the "smellies" will be far more
competent & ruthless and likely an authoritarian. The philosophical principles of the
primacy of the natural rights of citizens and the rule of law of our founding has long been
gone. The oligarchy is firmly in control and will suppress dissent more harshly with a lot of
support from the media-managerial class.
The oligarchy will do their very best to prevent the organization of the "Smellies" into a
potent national force. If any small group act out they will be treated harshly. Since the
"Smellies" cannot use the ballot box to push back, how do you think they will organize and
counter the oligarchic forces who have all levers of power and have demonstrated naked exercise
of it?
If this is the the hill the democrats choose to stand and fight on.....instead of solving
the problems of our country being shutdown for almost a whole year and counting...
This post is an important warning for all of the Democrats that now rule us and seek to
fundamentally change the country while condradulating themselves for their cleverness in
twisting Tuesday's events into a condemnation of half of the country. I'm sure it will be
ignored.
In the context of analysis not being advocacy (please!), Tuesday's breaching of the Capitol,
IMO, hardly merits the level of pearl clutching that it has generated; whether genuine or
opportunistic. It could have been a true Constitutional crisis. Rather than a group jesters
breaking in, dancing around and generally mocking our politicians, it could have very easily
been serious men with guns blazing and Molotov cocktails/bombs being hurled and lots of dead
congress people along with dead Capitol security. That with a simultaneous destruction of the
power grid and cell phone communications, roads blocked, trucking into the city disrupted, food
and other essential goods and services stacked and disrupted and assassinations of bureaucrats
and media personalities in key locations - an armed siege of Washington DC and a bloody attack
on the establishment; very easily. All it would take is a couple hundred thousand seriously
pissed off Deplorables; some percent with military background. Such an uprising would probably
spontaneously spread to capitols in democrat governed states across the country; "spread" if
not pre-coordinated. There have more than number of MAGA types in DC in recent months airing
grievances. In Michigan crowds of armed men were in the capitol last year.
Some will say that such an event is impossible. I don't think so. Make Americans desperate
enough and they could very well go all 1776. Would they ultimately prevail? I have no idea. But
at least they would show the swamp that they are the men they thought they were.
Some will say the answer is to take away the guns. Attempting to do so will actually greatly
increase the odds of the above occurring. The only answer is to truly come together as a
people, find a middle ground and to dispense with radicalism on both sides of the aisle.
Politicians and whoever is pulling their strings must give up dreams of hegemony and victory.
When they thinking act in those terms, it is they who have declared war and there will be a
proportional reaction.
"There is nothing I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each
arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my
humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our constitution."
– John Adams
We have been headed down this binary road for a few generations. Outside of defending the
overall borders of the USA, the military has been used based on lies for decades. That simple
fact has always reminded me of Rome... Congress has been in gridlock or else playing seesaw
between parties, yet executing similar strategies.
One other quote that people ought to digest, remembering this was a REPUBLIC, not just a
democracy...
"Democracy while it lasts is more bloody than aristocracy or monarchy. Remember, democracy
never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There is never a democracy that
did not commit suicide." - John Adams
I am going to go reread some Tacitus - it's a fine collection for perspective
management.
There will be NO going back to anything like 2016 friends...change is baked in on every
front.
"... As the duly selected leader of Binomo, I will be having serious words with my Head of Intelligence over this embarrassing political imbroglio. ..."
Oh noes, I am totally gutted. It turns out the Viking Man is a GRU agent all along, and
this is all a last ditch effort by Russia to keep their man in place.
'But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object
evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their
duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.'
The train of abuses (short, 4 year recap)
Crossfire Hurricane delegitimised peaceful handover of executive power.
Fake impeachment delegitimised the impeachment process.
Executive overreach due to covid delegitimised the authority of state legislatures.
Scam election delegitimised the election process.
Putting Trump on trial will delegitimise executive privilege.
These plus the previous suspentions of habeas corpus, due process death of the first
amendment, imply that the constitution is for the most part de facto dead.
The protest should have been a sit in instead of some larking around, Tiannamen style (for
the inevitable lols US hypocrisy would reveal).
Still, Congress has had single digit approval ratings for decades, so it's odd to say
these were insurrectionists attacking the people's representatives.
Sadly America is finished, and what is left can only be called 'the nation formerly known as
America'.
The incoming fascists and their unwitting kapos won't have much time even with those
embers, as its economy was long carved out, in ikizukuri fashion.
How do pacify 72 million voters, many of whom are convinced that they have been cheated?.
How do you stop them ALL from marching on the White house?
Answer; You stage a psyop . You let in a number of colourful figures disguised as
"Manhatten-cowboy style trappers " - add a bit of shoving and pushing, lots of
shouting. Cameramen(or women) at the ready. and bingo... everyone can go home afterwards
saying "we tried" or "we did our bit".
Item one, a clip: Notice the two cameramen, one following the "break-in+, and the other at
the top of the stairs. All filmed in glorious technicolour and HD by professionals)
I love the first demonstrator signaling the cop to retreat, small hand signal.
The MSM and "Governments" can all now play the " we support Democracy, look how we are
above all this mayhem ". Visible moral fibre on tap and statements prewritten?
Zuckerberg and mass media can silence any comment including Trumps or those that come from
the "deplorables". Which is what they have done to silence any revision of the narrative,
before it gains traction. (Zuckie rules, he must do as he wasn't elected, probably got
there by hereditary means )
The bit-parts were played by members of the house who had their masks ready under their
seats.
The unfortunate lady was probably an accident as the Police there just can't resist
shooting someone.
Read Trump's earlier stuff from Reuters
"
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The chaos in the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday unfolded after President
Donald Trump spent weeks whipping up his supporters with false allegations of fraud in the
Nov. 3 election, culminating in a call to march to the building that represents U.S.
democracy.
The real question is was the election stolen? On balance, I would guess that
it was and that is why the courts all refused to examine the evidence, instead of allowing
the evidence to be presented and refuted. Trumps case was never answered only trashed
and ridiculed.
Turka #125
I also find it incredibly disingenuous that protestors/"rioters" made it into the Capitol
building despite sturdy doors, and the police couldn't stave it off.
just another addition to the "both sides are assholes" exhibit: the first comment on the
NPR tweet about the unarmed woman killed by a cop is "coups have consequences".
even putting aside the whole (valid) "if it was a black woman killed by a cop" argument,
i've loved seeing the past 4 years of so called "liberals" slowly losing their mask of
humanity. they complain about the MAGA types as if they're the barbarians at the gate but
they're ALL americans and therefore have violence and hatred of the "other" baked in from
birth.
also, if that shitbag thinks this was a "coup" then they're even less informed than their
idiotic comment would suggest.
Very well said. It's amazing how much you can tell about the agenda of the deep state just
by careful reading and noticing the words chosen--especially when you keep seeing the same
words repeated incessantly.
And incidentally, at first I was a bit curious about all this over-the-top sudden calls to
impeach Trump and that sort of nonsense...I was thinking it was just a matter of continued
venting of hatred at him for his "gift" of exposing the hypocrisy and duplicity of the deep
state, and the US in general. But it just occurred to me that no, it's because it has dawned
on them that a Trump drummed out of office by a clearly fraudulent election (i.e.,
righteously indignant) could be quite a rallying point for the disenfranchised regular
citizens of the US. So, they're hoping to spend these last two weeks doing everything they
can to tarnish his reputation and try to destroy his ability to rally the troops, so to
speak. I don't think it will work, but then again who knows to what depths they will sink to
permanently sink Trump. Expect a lot more craziness these last two weeks.
"... That Biden now falsely declares that the people who enter the capitol are terrorists, who thereby need to be handled as such, will deepen the rift within the U.S. society. It guarantees that some of the 'deplorables' who Biden designates as terrorists will become real ones. The U.S. military has ample experience with doing that in Iraq and elsewhere. During the early years of the occupation it designated legitimate resistance to the occupation as terrorism and thereby sowed the seeds for real terrorism. ..."
"... That Lego is superb. I want one. Note that Pelosi and others are pushing for "impeachment" to stop, legally, Trump from standing for President in four years time. That is what they fear, a return of the Orange with 75 million voters for starters. Pelosi is obviously planning her own return as well. Immortality for the queen Bee? ..."
"... By allowing the protesters into the Capital Building, the chance to challenge the certification of the various states' electors was lost. This was Trump's and his supporters' last chance. They have been played like a piano. Quite brilliant, in its way. Game over. ..."
"... The conspiracy view would acknowledge that Trump walked right into a trap that he himself set. No one knew it would be so easy to stroll into the Capitol building, and therein lies the judo throw to the mat - and if that was planned, then credit is due to the planners. If it was contrived in any way then it happened through whomever/whatever was dictating Capitol security. ..."
"... In our discussion of this last night, the wife and I agreed that the primary actor in this is the "Security Services" since they stand to benefit ASAP as with 911. I posted the following to Escobar's FB earlier this morning: ..."
"... "Biden called the protesters 'Terrorists;' but, how could Biden make such a huge mistake when he was up to his neck in the facilitation of genuine terrorists in Libya then Syria? I'll bet there's lots of dirt connecting Biden to the development of Daesh and support for Al-Ciada and kin. No one has really looked thanks to the various Hunter Biden sideshows." ..."
"... they are not left or even pseudo left. Their party currently serves global, the most predatory kind of capital, and they constantly invoke 'racial' grievances. That's typical far-right shit. ..."
"... You shouldn't be surprised at the rhetoric of the Democrats. It is their corporate identity to call black white and white black. BLM savages, smashing shops, looting and burning cars are "peaceful pro-democracy demonstrators." A white (already guilty!), unarmed woman, Trump supporter (doubly guilty!) shot at point-blank is a "terrorist". ..."
"... The same thing happened in Ukraine (which is the zone of responsibility of the Democrats) after the coup - residents of Donbass who refused to accept the coup were declared "terrorists". ..."
"... One guy wearing an animal skin cloak is actually the son of a New York State Superior Court judge and powerful Democratic Party leader. https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2021/01/07/at-maga-rally-israeli-flag-and-neo-nazis-co-exist-awkwardly/ ..."
"... This election, they took no chances, ensuring Trump could not use social media, and although he may well have lost simply due to his policies - covid, china ..."
"... And what's important is that with Rs now jumping Trump's ship, the working class must feel that they don't have any political representation at all. ..."
"... The US Capitol is hardly a "sacred temple of democracy," it's the sleaziest brothel in the world, totally bought and controlled by powerful interest groups and foreign governments. Who are they kidding? ..."
In a blistering speech one day after pro-trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in an
unprecedented security breach, U.S. President-elect Joe Biden said the perpetrators should be
considered 'domestic terrorists'.
"Don't dare call them protesters. They were a riotous mob. Insurrectionists. Domestic
terrorists. It's that basic. It's that simple."
That the incoming president declares a number of activist from the opposing party to be
'terrorists' demonstrates how unqualified he is for that job.
Those rabbles were in no way terrorists. They were not even a mob. Most of them were
out-of-town rednecks who felt that they had been wronged. They wanted to express that. They
were surprised when they found how easy it was to enter the Capitol and they apparently took
more time to take pictures than to rearrange the furniture.
This was not a coup attempt either. These folks had no weapons, no training and, most
importantly, they
had no plan of what to do except to maybe enter to then leave:
And yet, and yet . This was no Vietnam-level rioting. This wasn't even a serious occupation,
which one would think was the point, to keep Congress from executing the final ratification
of the Biden win. Could you image the spectacle of democracy chastened if the Trump mob had
held the Capitol and forced Congress to scramble find a hotel ballroom in which to finish
their official business?
Nope, Congress was back in business by 8:00 PM,
roughly seven hours after the barbarians stormed the walls, albeit with pretty much
everyone badly rattled and some Trump supporters rapidly backpedaling from their former
positions.
Despite the gravity of the event, if you look not very hard at what happened, both sides
in their different ways were shambolic.
[L]et's be clear about what did not take place at the Capitol Building last night. This was
not a fascist coup, as so many shrill, supposedly liberal commentators are claiming. Their
flagrant use of the word 'fascist' to describe every political movement they disapprove of is
an insult to reason and history. This wasn't a coup full stop. The National Guard suppressed
the morons, the barricades were put back up, and even their hero Donald Trump told them to go
home. A coup is a conscious effort to illegally seize power from the government. These people
couldn't even believe they made it into the Capitol Building. They were like children finding
a candy store unguarded.
[Rep. Anna] Eshoo also blasted the Capitol Hill police, calling their lackluster response a
"failure across the board" and describing the barricades outside the Capitol complex "like
doggy doors it was like, 'Welcome, I'm taking you on a tour.' "
Lawmakers, she said, had gotten a detailed memo about street barricades and procedures,
but when she arrived and looked across the Capitol Hill plaza, "I thought, where is
everyone?"
These were not terrorists but tourists who came from all over the states to Washington for
fun and to register their disagreement with the 'elites'. The Capitol Hill policeman correctly
recognized that the protesters were not enemies of the state but rather normal Americans:
Maggie Haberman @maggieNYT - 4:16 UTC · Jan 8,
2021
Cops gave rioters directions to Schumer's office but aimed a gun at a photographer and didn't
believe she was a journalist. Astonishing this is the level of security in the halls of a
co-equal branch of government in the post-9/11 era.
Yet Biden and others are furious about the stunt because it lifted the veil off their
vaunted U.S. 'democracy' and its empty rituals:
Nicholas J. Fuentes @NickJFuentes - 21:01 UTC · Jan 7,
2021
The US Capitol is hardly a "sacred temple of democracy," it's the sleaziest brothel in the
world, totally bought and controlled by powerful interest groups and foreign governments. Who
are they kidding?
Congressional processes are dirty fights about the distribution of the loot. There is
nothing sacred about it. Just consider the
massive bribes that were taken during the Georgia Senate races. Those hundreds of millions
of 'donations' will have to be paid back in kind.
The threat inflation, the wild claims about a fascist coup, are transparent efforts by the
cosseted political and cultural elites to endow their project with moral importance; to give
their restoration of managerial, technocratic power after the four-year populist experiment
– which is fundamentally the project that Biden and his influential supporters are
currently engaged in – the gloss of historical urgency. It is mission creation.
Worse, this narrative-building will allow the elites to circumscribe even more forms of
political thought and speech than they already desire to do , on the basis that the latent
fascism among the American rabble is likely to be stirred up by inflammatory ideas and
commentary. Indeed, we've already been given a chilling glimpse of this post-incursion
clampdown on 'violent' speech in Twitter's extraordinary decision to ban, outright, three of
Trump's tweets last night and to lock him out of his account for 12 hours.
It strikes me that this unilateral use of corporate power by Silicon Valley to prevent the
democratically elected president of the United States from engaging with millions of his
voters and supporters, to physically forbid him from partaking in online discussion, is a
grave assault on democracy, too. More grave, I would say, than the immoral and
anti-democratic incursion of the Capitol Building. Already, right away, we are seeing that
the threat-inflating response to last night's events will likely have longer-lasting negative
consequences for open debate and democratic norms than the thing itself.
It is even worse than that. The Democrats reaction to the slapstick action is likely to
create more strife.
That Biden now falsely declares that the people who enter the capitol are terrorists, who
thereby need to be handled as such, will deepen the rift within the U.S. society. It guarantees
that some of the 'deplorables' who Biden designates as terrorists will become real ones. The
U.S. military has ample experience with doing that in Iraq and elsewhere. During the early
years of the occupation it designated legitimate resistance to the occupation as terrorism and
thereby sowed the seeds for real terrorism.
An even worse strategy is to blame the whole incident on the 'terrorist leader' Donald
Trump. During the rally that preceded the Capitol incident Trump did not
tell the people to enter the building:
"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully
and patriotically make your voices heard ," Trump told the crowd on Wednesday.
After the people had unexpectedly entered the Capitol building Trump
asked them to leave :
He said: "I know your pain, I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us,
it was a landslide election and everyone knows it especially the other side.
"But you have to go home now, we have to have peace, we have to have law and order, we
have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt."
Some 74 million people voted for Trump. What will they do if the Democrats now unfairly try
to impeach him over an incident he did not cause?
Do not expect them to ignore it or to change their opinions. This analogy is apt.
Max Abrahms @MaxAbrahms - 14:21 UTC · 5 Jan
2021
Careful what you wish for.
My research shows leaders often restrain lower level members.
So taking out the leader tends to make the group more -- not less -- radical in its tactical
choices.
I have loads of empirical & theoretical work on this finding if you'd like to discuss.
Even the Islamic State foresees
that this will lead to more strife within the U.S.:
[T]he bitter feeling of defeat that the supporters of the 'Taghut' Trump have expressed
during their recent protests- which followed the protests of their adversaries from the
supporters of the 'Democratic Party' during the past year- will push them to exert more
effort and offer more support for their Taghut during the next four years or whoso stands
with him alongside the seat of the presidency, in order to achieve revenge for themselves and
achieve victory over their adversaries again. This means that the conflict between the two
parties and their supporters inside America will be very intense, and the focus of the
policies of the two parties during this time will be greater on the internal issues to
guarantee gaining more electoral votes.
By using the 'terrorist' moniker Biden, and the media, are taking this thing into the wrong
direction. It creates more extremism and will likely have bloody consequences.
Posted by b on January 8, 2021 at 19:00 UTC |
Permalink
That Lego image makes the whole thing a total farce, great catch. The world is laughing.
Compare
Actual Capitol Image with
Capitol Invasion Some terrorists!
That Lego is superb. I want one.
Note that Pelosi and others are pushing for "impeachment" to stop, legally, Trump from
standing for President in four years time. That is what they fear, a return of the Orange
with 75 million voters for starters. Pelosi is obviously planning her own return as well. Immortality for the queen Bee?
There will not be another election since the deplorables know that the system and the
elections will be stolen. As we proceed into 2021 and the economy slows, the ungovernables
will do their best to counter the deep state at every turn. 70 plus million people will be
thinking of ways to turn the ivory castle to ashes. If only 3%, more than 2 million carry out
acts as acts of opportunity, then the elites will be in agony.
Whoa, I like this. To the post, I'd add that a woman-protester was martyred (so to say). Shot dead. That's an
important moment, in context you're presenting here...
Why is anyone surprised ?
The first thing they did after the election was start the Trump Accountability Project
seeking to blacklist staff who worked for the Trump administration. They tried to derail his administration before he even took office...
By allowing the protesters into the Capital Building, the chance to challenge the
certification of the various states' electors was lost. This was Trump's and his supporters'
last chance. They have been played like a piano. Quite brilliant, in its way. Game over.
This will be one for history to try to decide: Conspiracy or Fuck-up?
The shambolic fuck-up view is already very well articulated in b's article, and parses
well.
The conspiracy view would acknowledge that Trump walked right into a trap that he himself
set. No one knew it would be so easy to stroll into the Capitol building, and therein lies
the judo throw to the mat - and if that was planned, then credit is due to the planners. If
it was contrived in any way then it happened through whomever/whatever was dictating Capitol
security.
Maybe this is the new type of terrorist: One who is too dumb to even realize that he is one.
In these hours the U.S. maybe took a step to a new form of government: The Idiocracy
...
For four years the Democrats tried to defile the Constitution
and disenfranchise those Voters that gave Donald Trump their vote in 2016.
An attempted coup - make that coups, plural.
The Voters noticed. They witnessed the treachery, the endless Russiagate lies, the attempt
to nullify their votes.
All the while they were also told 24/7 that the President was a racist
and by extension so were they the Voters.
The ***reaction*** that occurred was not blamed on the Deep State, nor it's echo chamber
the MSM,
nor the treacherous Democrats. No, it was blamed on Donald Trump so that
they could attempt to coup him one more time. Today Voters witness the Democrats attempt *another* coup. What reaction from the Voters do they seek this time?
First of all, I agree this was not a coup, it was a bunch of literal LARPers messing around.
However I think trying to absolve Trump from this is silly, do you really think that if he
hadn't spent 2 months whining about how the election was stolen from him and his supporters
needed to "stop the steal" this would have still happened? That being said, I think
impeaching him (again) is silly, it's just a symbolic act that distracts from more pressing
issues.
Gee Mike #3, what about that cop who got his head bashed?
How about the cops who got KIA'd over the summer during the mostly peaceful protests?
Where is the outrage?
From a few steps back, this whole thing serves many purposes but the one thing for sure is
that it will in crease the Red vs. Blue BiPolar divide in the US of A!
In our discussion of this last night, the wife and I agreed that the primary actor in this
is the "Security Services" since they stand to benefit ASAP as with 911. I posted the
following to Escobar's FB earlier this morning:
"Biden called the protesters 'Terrorists;' but, how could Biden make such a huge mistake
when he was up to his neck in the facilitation of genuine terrorists in Libya then Syria?
I'll bet there's lots of dirt connecting Biden to the development of Daesh and support for
Al-Ciada and kin. No one has really looked thanks to the various Hunter Biden sideshows."
The economic situation I described in my reply to Gruff @350 in the Leaving in Style
thread is ripe to generate many more protests. And the protests will retard attempts to crush
COVID and thus worsen the Depression further. It would be wise to review how social unrest
progressed during the First Great Depression to get an idea of what will come.
It was fun to watch "upper cast" (politicians) trembling in fear hiding behind their seats
while mob was trying to break doors. They thought they were above it all and that they are
under protection from their masters, yet they found out they are just as expendable.
This is the shock they are feeling now.
Next up will be people (terrorists) who very publicly point this out this "Anti-Narrative" -
like you have just done.
Censorship is on the way, because facts have become the enemy and now there is
justification. YOU ARE INCITING VIOLENCE BY EXPOSING THE FACTS!!!!!!!!!!! And if censorship does not work, then you WILL become a member of the Julian Assange
Club!
Watch your back out there, because this will get worse before it becomes better.
"These were not terrorists but tourists who came from all over the states to Washington for
fun..."
...
Official US Policy is Terrorism.
Economic sanctions are Terrorism.
Military "interventions" and outright bombing invasions are in fact Official US policies OF
Terrorism.
US media condones and supports US War Crimes of Terrorism.
"The greatest purveyor of violence in the world : My own Government, I can not be
Silent."
― Martin Luther King Jr.
The US govt left/right and its propagandized complicit citizens are the "greatest"
terrorist on the f'n planet.
It seems from the comments the the barflies are all convinced that the election was
NOT stolen from Trump. I wonder why? The unanimity of the MSM that it WAS
stolen and the unanimous refusal of the various courts to even consider hearing Trump's case,
seems very fishy to me. Maybe he lost, but I would not care to bet on it.
I noticed that Democrats increasingly sound Nazi like too, calling their opponents "Low
IQ", "Dumb", "Rabble", with "lower education", etc. It sounds increasingly pro-elite and anti-working class.
Note that the left of the 20th century never sounded like that, and embraced "the poor",
the "lowly educated", the "rabble", the "low classes", etc. vs the "highly educated" and the
"elite", that had the highest education possible.
It again reminds me that actual Left does not exist in the US, rather a heavily
propagandized and brainwashed by the local elite pseudo left that is mostly controlled
by the elite.
I was watching live footage from Status Coup while the protesters were fighting the cops at
the gates, literally had a front row seat of what was going on, and all I could think of was
how undermanned and ill prepared the cops were with a bunch of bike cops and very few cops
with full riot gear. The mayor had been begging for days if not weeks for more equipment and
men but he never got it. It really seems like this was a planned event for some reason, maybe
to try and impeach the orange wonder so he can't come back in 4 years and ruin Biden's day.
Not that it matters much because neither of them are really in charge of anything important
and they're both scumbags anyway, but it would be nice to see the dem elites humiliated in
2024.
This certainly wasn't a coup. However, the murder of a police officer means it wasn't a
peaceful protest either. Exaggerations on one side or the other do no good. It was a crowd of
protesters who, in part because of the lack of security, got out of control.
Is there video evidence of the protesters attacking and bashing the police officer with the
fire extinguisher? This is quite important to know. The police officer (Brian Sicknick) was
able to walk back to his station after the attack and it was there where he collapsed. He was
known to be a Trump supporter himself. Until there is visual evidence or witnesses to the
attack are able to speak freely, we cannot say who or what was responsible for his collapse
and death. It may be that something else unrelated to the attack happened later on that
caused his death.
Imo, it's because they are not left or even pseudo left. Their party currently serves
global, the most predatory kind of capital, and they constantly invoke 'racial' grievances.
That's typical far-right shit.
That the incoming president declares a number of activist from the opposing party to be
'terrorists' demonstrates how unqualified he is for that job.
You shouldn't be surprised at the rhetoric of the Democrats. It is their corporate
identity to call black white and white black. BLM savages, smashing shops, looting and
burning cars are "peaceful pro-democracy demonstrators." A white (already guilty!), unarmed
woman, Trump supporter (doubly guilty!) shot at point-blank is a "terrorist".
The same thing happened in Ukraine (which is the zone of responsibility of the Democrats)
after the coup - residents of Donbass who refused to accept the coup were declared
"terrorists". Despite the fact that it is the Kiev regime that is terrorist - it arranges a
blockade of Crimea and Donbass, blows up power transmission towers, tries to enter Crimea to
commit terrorist acts, makes successful and not very successful attempts to kidnap people in
Donbass and even in Russia, etc. Not even talking about the murders of political and military
leaders of the LDPR, secret fascist prisons for torturing people...
But with all this, it is the inhabitants of Donbass who are "terrorists".
- the point about "taking out leaders" is true. just look at juarez or
post-medellín colombia (not to mention iraq). when the alpha dog gets put down the
betas all fight for his place.
- funny how supposedly "left" twitter twats fail to see this as "chickens coming home to
roost" and instead whine about coups and "insurrections".
- not so funny how the same people (rightfully at the time) disgusted by rittenhouse are
basically spewing the same stupidity he and his supporters have been spewing for months. the
difference being of course that he was a dumbass militia LARPer and a twitchy spaz whereas
these are ostensibly grown-ass adults. it's almost verbatim: "derp the guys with guns were
totes scared of the unarmed dorks behind a barricaded door with heavily armed police on
the steps directly behind them " to "she was on their propertah! looting means shootin'!"
to "f_cking white bitch had it coming because breonna taylor" and so on and so on. never mind
the media flatly stating "she was into Q so screw the dumb bitch she deserved it".
it's also quite an elephant in the room when you watch the video and the asshole who shot
her in the neck appears to be a black (or at least dark skinned) cop. maybe it was just
shadows or whatever but wouldn't that make their response all the more illuminating.
this is just further evidence of advice i was given as a child: "remember that for every person who wants equality there are ten who want
superiority ".
- funny seeing the brothel comment because my alternate headlines for this were:
"Brothel Stormed: Pimps Watch Safely From Fairfax VA and Manhattan" and
"Bosses Storm Office: Several Killed by Their Employees"
- despite naive denials by otherwise sharp observers it's hard not to look at this and
imagine the cops thinking "let's see if you commies want to defund us now
".
@ 36 - I don't think b is at all supporting Trump. He is just pointing out some of the
absurdities of this whole situation. And I am a Latino citizen of the USA.
This whole spectacle has made me very sad. Guy Debord hopefully is laughing.
I always expected this moment. Chickens come home, taste of our own medicine, etc.
I fear what the future holds for the entire planet with the Bidet administration. At least
the orange one created enough discord that we didn't start any new wars. And to me, he seemed
sincere in ending some of the ones we have been engaged in for decades.
I think the color of our revolution will be rainbow.
".. the left of the 20th century never sounded like that, and embraced "the poor", the "lowly
educated", the "rabble", the "low classes", etc. vs the "highly educated" and the "elite",
that had the highest education possible..."
Passer by@30
I agree, B's analysis is spot on in this instance. Congress has been more or less taunting
the people for years, daring them to show the displeasure that the oligarchy has ensured
cannot be communicated through the ballot box.
Was the election fraudulent? Of course it was- the Green Party cannot even get onto the
ballot in many states. The whole system is corrupt and 'the fix' is in in every election.
This has been the case for a long time but never more than during the cycles beginning in the
Bush 'win' in 2000, since when there has been a rapid and general deterioration in the
enforcement of civil rights acts relating to voter suppression and the regulation of election
spending. During the same period the Democrats have taken several measures to prevent primary
voters from selecting candidates and elected Convention delegates from controlling
conventions, policy and party elections.
So when Trump said that the election was corrupt-echoing the claims Clinton made in 2016- it
is not surprising that millions took him seriously, because except for the detail that he
actually did not win, what he said confirmed what everyone knew.
The surprising aspect of the election is the complete solidarity of the oligarchy, its media
and bien pensant opinion that the 2020 Presidential Election was absolutely fair, a model of
democracy.
Hell, if what took place in the US had happened in Bolivia the same oligarchs, media etc
would have been urging the people of La Paz to storm the Assembly. And they'd have paid the
army to back them up and kill.
Reading around the blogs, some authors believe there was no vote rigging and others believe
there was something in Trumps claims. Last election Clinton was put up as the face of the Us
deep state - Five Eyes Anglosphere and they believed that the controlled media would carry
her to victory.
This election, they took no chances, ensuring Trump could not use social media, and although
he may well have lost simply due to his policies - covid, china, ect ect, it is also
inconceivable to think the powers that be did not tinker with votes. If I could eat the
stuff, I would have a big supply of popcorn. This is like watching the headchoppers of Idlib
blowing each other away.
"It will polarize the parties in the conflict even more."
And what's important is that with Rs now jumping Trump's ship, the working class must feel
that they don't have any political representation at all. Thus, it could turn into the
early-to-mid-nineties model with organized armed militias and all that.
Posted by: Heironymous Dosh | Jan 8 2021 21:19 utc | 47
My information on the son of the judge contradicts yours. I'm not sure of the father's
party affiliation, but he's an orthodox pro-Zionist Israel high ranking member of the
orthodox Jewish community in New York.
Aaron Mostofsky, whose father is Kings County Supreme Court Judge Steven (Shlomo)
Mostofsky, entered the building wearing fur pelts and a bulletproof vest and carrying a
riot shield he said he found, Gothamist reported, citing the New York Post.
Mostofsky was photographed several times on Wednesday next to Jake Angeli, a QAnon
supporter who also wore a horned hat and furry outfit, though it is not clear that their
outfits were coordinated.
He was among the many Orthodox Jews who came to the Capitol to protest, telling the Post
that he wanted "to express my opinion as a free American that this election was stolen"
from President Donald Trump. Mostofsky is one of dozens of "persons of interest" sought by
Washington police for unlawful entry to the building.
"We were cheated," he said. "I don't think 75 million people voted for Trump -- I think
it was close to 85 million."
Mostofsky's brother Nachman, the executive director of Chovevei Zion, a politically
conservative Orthodox advocacy organization, as well as a Brooklyn district leader and vice
president of the South Brooklyn Conservative Club, also attended the rally Wednesday but
did not enter the Capitol.
So here we are again. One side simply refusing to believe anything that contradicts the
viewpoint they wish was true. I have seen nothing to indicate his father was a Democrat and
I'm not going to go out on a limb and say he isn't. But it hardly matters in the orthodox
Jewish community as they will support any politician or party that benefits themselves and
preserves the Israeli occupation of Palestine, just like Trump's administration bent over
backward to do for 4 years.
This posting appears to make an inverse error from those of media and pol accounts that
exaggerated the event. There are multiple instances of social media and interviews that show
people travelled to this event with the intent of a showdown or even a "revolution" against
what they perceived as a socialist takeover and fraud concerning the presidential election.
The US ruling class has ample experience in overturning governments and overturning
legitimate elections. There's no evidence that Trump lost by these means. But Trump's insistence
that he was cheated out of his landslide victory has mobilized a primarily racist and
reactionary core of followers. These protesters are not people who care about democracy in,
say, Venezuela!
There are a number of videos of protesters fighting cops at the Capitol. We have the fact
as well that some 5 cops were hospitalized, and one has now died. One protester, attempting
to break through a barricaded door inside the Capitol, appears to have been shot point-blank
by police.
Given Trump's ongoing insistence that the country was being stolen from his supporters and
that he won in a landslide, in what fashion does b feel this was going to end?
The issue boils down to what extent one feels that even the shell of a rotten democracy
matters when forces are gathered to stop its processes. Up until nearly the invasion of the
Capitol, Trump was saying that VP Pence needed to stop the counting of what Trump maintained
were fraudulent electoral college votes.
In fact, it matters a good deal. When the corrupt "democratic" Provisional Government that
replaced the Russian Czar in Feb. 1917 was threatened with military ouster by a Czarist
general six months later, the Bolsheviks defended the government against forces that promised
a return to oppressive autocracy, if not fascist rule. A few months after that the Bolsheviks
overthrew the Provisional Government with the help of soldiers and sailors who hated the fact
the PG was still prosecuting the extremely bloody World War.
Today, there is no powerful Bolshevik Party on the left (certainly not in the U.S.). But
the Democratic Party has blood on its hands just as the Russian social democrats in the PG
did 100 years ago. The issue is also not about a military takeover. But let us look at what
would occur if the forces that temporarily occupied the Capitol were to implement their
program with a series of victories. These forces are not really populist, but are a plebeian
group of rightists who share one thing in common, their hatred and fear of BLM and the idea
of black equality in general. It has not been helpful that the Democrats, in administering
capitalist austerity for years, have turned a deaf ear to issues such as jobs, leaving poorer
whites and lower middle class vulnerable to poverty to turn to racist demagogues like
Trump.
To overturn the election in favor of Trump would be to embolden the right and racists.
There is a small group of right wing reactionary racists in the military, and it's not
impossible that they could gather more power if society were to descend into more chaos.
Hence, while portraying the takeover of the Capitol as an "insurrection" is hyperbole,
underplaying it as just an accidental event with no real harm intended is also incorrect.
Trump's victory in overturning current electoral processes would represent a huge victory for
the Right and increase racist attacks. Biden's win does not bode much lite than a turn back
to the status quo, which also has very little to recommend it, for workers, for minorities,
and certainly not to the millions who suffer terribly under US sanctions and US-backed
oppressive governments abroad.
What we lack is real leadership that can unite both black and white and other minorities
with those struggling against US imperialism abroad and bring an end to the rule of the 1%
who don't care how many they kill, or what cynicism or bloody manipulations they use to
maintain the rule of their Capitalist class.
I offer this
article as something to peruse and think about. When considering the author's sources,
remember that today's voices that provide truths are often marginalized in an attempt to
delegitimize those truths -- Think of Hudson's political-economic history and his entire corpus
of research as an excellent example of the contemporary dismissal of salient Truths.
Also it
must be acknowledged that real conspiracies do occur, thus those trying to expose them aren't
"theorists" but investigators. Also recall the maxim that all plans fall apart as soon as
they meet concerted opposition when rethinking the rise of Trump and the 4 years of certain
conspiratorial opposition against most everything he tried to do. And also remember that only
Trump knows why he made the choices he made, and that the vast majority of speculation
remains just that.
Very interesting and perceptive take on the Jan 6 Capital Building incident, from a youtuber
name Joe Leonard: Chaotic Protest at the Capitol in Washington DC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLxX3Rn_EyQ
(13 min)
Joe notes the 'photogenic' heavily tattooed Mr. 'Buffalo-Head' alleged MAGA/Q supporter
person shown prominently in photos in the Capital Bldg hallways and Rotunda, seems to also
have an "actor's resume" web page, and sports a prominent triangular 'Pedo-love' tattoo on
his chest. Not very MAGA Deplorable-ish of Mr. Buffalo/Viking Head, Joe wonders.
The US Capitol is hardly a "sacred temple of democracy," it's the sleaziest brothel in the
world, totally bought and controlled by powerful interest groups and foreign governments.
Who are they kidding?
Great post b, lot of gems. Loved the great "Is this a terrorist?" image and the Lego / candy
store point.
For those that mentioned that a cop was killed, that unfortunate fact does not mean that
the majority of the protesters were a "mob" or "terrorists" as opposed to being "like
children finding a candy store unguarded" - any more than the fact that an unarmed female
protester (the Air Force veteran) was unnecessarily shot dead make all of the Capitol police
bad. Both were very unfortunate, but to go from that to calling this "terrorism" makes no
sense.
Biden urgently instructed the Western media "Don't dare call them protesters. They were a
riotous mob. Insurrectionists. Domestic terrorists."
If these protesters were "terrorists", what then were those in Hong Kong who went around
for months armed with umbrellas, pipes, and bricks, and brutally beat and even threw oil and
lit fire to people and infrastructure? Those terrorists, always presented by our hypocritical
establishment-serving media as "pro-democracy protesters", were sponsored and encouraged by
the US. Five Eyes countries like the US, UK, Canada, and I presume Australia, New Zealand,
then offered citizenship as reward for their terrorist services, (along with White Helmets
Islamic extremist proxies from Idlib, Syria.)
Also loved the Nick J. Fuentes quote: "The US Capitol is hardly a "sacred temple of
democracy," it's the sleaziest brothel in the world, totally bought and controlled by
powerful interest groups and foreign governments. Who are they kidding?"
Or in Biden's classic words, "The citadel of Liberty".
"My information on the son of the judge contradicts yours. I'm not sure of the father's
party affiliation, but he's an orthodox pro-Zionist Israel high ranking member of the
orthodox Jewish community in New York"
I don't see the contradiction. You agree on the cultural aspect, and say you have no idea
of the political aspects. The information is not mine. It is reported by Richard Silverstein who seems to be well up
on these things - and a fervent anti-Trumper. If you have reason to believe his information
is incorrect, you could contact him with a correction. I'm sure he is a nice enough chap and
would welcome the clarification.
"Thank you for clarifying American idiom. Now when the police say 'X was injured after making
physical contact with the protesters' it really means that 'X was beaten to death with
baseball bats'. "
Meh. For all we know, he could've made physical contact with the protesters, slipped,
fallen, broken his neck.
Former Alaska governor and 2008 vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin leapt right into the conspiracy theory slipstream on Fox
News, claiming that she suspected the rioting, looting, and gunshots unleashed inside the Capitol by pro-Trump supporters was
actually a false flag operation by... Antifa.
Perhaps not surprisingly, Palin did not share any of this supposedly blockbuster evidence with host Martha MacCallum , who asked
her about earlier comments condemning the rioters as "fake patriots"
"Anyone who would storm the Capitol and create this, at least the perception of condoned violence, is not a true patriot,"
Palin insisted, before quickly pivoting to explicitly blame the media for being partly responsible for the unprecedented attack.
"How dangerous it is, in our time, society, to not be able to trust the media. I've been saying this for them years and years,
when we cannot trust, on either side, the nformations being fed to us, then, yeah, things like this will be a result because there
is so much frustration out there that some misguided -- very, very wrongheaded yahoos are out there causing this mayhem, and we
don't -- and a lot of it is the media's fault."
"But Martha, keep in mind, we don't know who all were the instigators in this, these horrible thing that happen today. I
think a lot of it is the Antifa folks."
Palin claimed, diving right into the deep end of the conspiracy theory pool with pure, politically-convenient speculation. "I've
been sent pictures of the same characters, whom were captured on images today storming the Capitol, as had been in protests on the
other side of politics earlier in the summer. So I don't know, there is a lot of questions out there, and I wish that we could trust
the media to do its job to do the research and report all these people are."
Absolutely. At the moment, many Americans actually think it makes a difference which mask
for the oligarchy is declared the winner. For sure it's being used as distraction from our
real fight against TPTB– and it may be used for disturbances that will lead to martial
law.
We are possibly the most propagandized people in the world. I have been awake since 1963,
and the really surprising thing is that uneducated people saw through it even then– but
not so many of the well-educated. That holds true even today. There ARE well-educated who see
through it– but those who don't are disproportionately among the educated.
I suppose they've just had more years of propaganda at university, or that they feel
themselves to be part of "the system". I've not met a single Mexican immigrant who hasn't
seen through it all– from covid to the election. Greatly to my surprise the the group
most attached to the covid story are the doctors– but not the nurses & menial
hospital workers.
A larger percentage has been sucked into electoral theatrics.
The only violence committed today was the Capitol Police shooting and reportedly killing an unarmed female Trump supporter who
was shot in the neck.
Jeffrey Prather has confirmed through his intelligence networks that the people who led the storming of the Capitol Building were
Antifa / BLM operatives. The entire attack was
a
false flag event
.
It's the police, in other words, who are committing the violence, not Trump supporters.
Given that Leftists have rigged everything else -- the media, Big Tech, the elections, U.S. history, etc. -- no one would be
surprised if they also rigged the events at the Capitol Building.
Patriots are polite. It's the radical Left that uses violence for political purposes.
Here's a video of the Capitol Police shooting an unarmed female Trump supporter in the neck:
(
Natural
News
) The storming of the US Capitol Building today is now being pounced upon by the left-wing media to demonize Trump
supporters as violent terrorists. Yet the same media outlets described Antifa / BLM violence as "mostly peaceful," even
when those left-wing actors were hurling Molotov cocktails and wielding blinding lasers against law enforcement.
Update: We have now confirmed that the storming of the Capitol Building was initiated by left-wing provocateurs who met
with Capitol Police yesterday and planned the event.
A photo has emerged of the "Viking" individual who led the
storming action today (shown on the right side of the photo below). This same person -- wearing the same outfit and nearly
identical face paint -- was also reportedly spotted at a BLM rally earlier this year.
Note the identical tattoos, facial hair and costume:
This short video shows Capitol Police actively waving a group of protesters to "breach" the Capitol building. It was
all coordinated:
"... "Our cause is to obtain an honest vote and to end voter fraud before it becomes a permanent tactic of the enabled and media-protected Democrat Party," he wrote. "Violence is rejected, condemned and counterproductive. Antifa involvement is no excuse. It contradicts our values." ..."
"... Alabama Representative Mo Brooks labelled rioters: "ANTIFA fascists in backwards MAGA hats." ..."
Ms Palin was far from the only Trump ally to promote
the refrain that the pro-Trump rioters were "infiltrated" by outside "agitators", namely Antifa, in an effort to
embarrass the president.
"Our cause is to obtain an honest vote and to end
voter fraud before it becomes a permanent tactic of the enabled and media-protected Democrat Party," he wrote.
"Violence is rejected, condemned and
counterproductive. Antifa involvement is no excuse. It contradicts our values."
Alabama Representative Mo Brooks labelled rioters:
"ANTIFA fascists in backwards MAGA hats."
Fox News host Sean Hannity
also cast doubt on the identity of "agitators" in the riots, saying "those who truly
support President Trump do not support those that commit acts of violence".
Following hours of chaos,
Mr
Trump issued a statement
telling the rioters to "go home in peace" before adding that he loved the mob, calling them
"special".
"We have to have peace. So go home. We love you.
You're very special. You've seen what happens you see the way, others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know
how you feel. But go home and go home and peace," he said.
Overwhelmingly, US commentators condemned the violence
and Mr Trump's muted response to rioters, with CNN anchor Jake Tapper
calling
the evening
an "absolutely disgraceful moment in American history".
"In my 60 years covering national politics, I've never
seen anything like it. And frankly I hope I never do again. It's pretty disturbing," Fox News Channel's Chris Wallace
said,
according
to USA Today.
Washington DC police said four people died during the
violent pro-Trump riot in the city, including a woman who was shot inside the Capitol. At least one improvised explosive
device was said to have been found.
'm writing this hours before posting it, so events may unfold that add more information.
The first thing you need to ask yourself: was the break-in at the Capitol, while Congress
was in session holding a debate about election certification, an attempt to stop a transfer of
power to Biden, or an attempt to stop the debate itself -- -during which legislators would have
laid out evidence of fraud?
The assault did achieve a stoppage of the debate, which was being carried live on
television. False flags do work
For the next 20 years, media will play up Wednesday, January 6, 2021, as the dark day
America almost broke apart. You can bet a few dozen production companies are already editing
footage for "stunning, award-winning" documentaries.
Democrats are feeling a burst of confidence that Trump's career as a politician is over --
-since he will forever be linked to "The Insurrection of January 6."
In their eyes, this is far better than a physical assassination.
On the night of February 27, 1933, a fire was set in the German Reichstag, the national
parliament. It burned a significant portion of the structure. Many historians state Hitler's
people set that fire -- -which at the time was successfully blamed on his main political
opponent, the Communist Party. The tactic allowed Hitler to consolidate his final needed piece
of national power.
Alongside the endorsement and support of IG Farben, the biggest pharmaceutical and chemical
cartel in the world, the Reichstag false flag gave Hitler control over the fate of Germany.
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED ,
EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX , and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX
, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29<sup>th</sup> District
of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is
the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an
investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS
Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative
power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails
here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine
emails here .
Inciting mod is a crime unless this is done neoliberals to achieve their goals. Where has he
been during Antifa violence?
Looks like Barr is trying to hide this false flag: Barr released a statement through former
Justice Department spokeswoman Keri Kupec, saying: "The violence at the Capitol Building is
outrageous and despicable. Federal agencies should move immediately to disperse it."
In an extraordinary statement, former Attorney General Bill Barr has completely thrown
President Donald Trump under the bus, accusing him of "orchestrating" the storming of the U.S.
Capitol and calling his alleged actions "inexcusable."
"Orchestrating a mob to pressure Congress is inexcusable. The president's conduct yesterday
was a betrayal of his office and supporters," he reportedly said in a statement to the
Associated Press on Thursday.
... ... ..
While there was nothing inherently wrong with the rally, it eventually dissolved into a riot
as the president's supporters
stormed the U.S. Capitol and commandeered the House and Senate chambers. Barr is clearly
among the myriads of Trump critics who believe the president bears responsibility for this.
Another theory, according to the president's most ardent supporters, is that Barr was never
loyal in the first place -- that it'd all been an act.
"... No country and no regime can stand on such truly galactic levels of doublethink, hypocrisy and cowardice. This is the beginning of the end of this regime. My thoughts tonight are with the "deplorables". In the prophetic words of George Orwell: ..."
I just listened to Trey Gowdy and a few others GOP big-shots condemn the "terrible
violations of the law" committed by the protestors today and I take my hat off to these folks:
they are truly world class hypocrites.
When cops and mayors refuse to protect the innocent, the rule of law is doing great!
When the letter soup agencies spend millions on a typical witch hunt, the rule of law is
doing great!
When the First Amendment is being destroyed by Big Tech, the rule of law is doing great!
When the corporate legacy ziomedia brazenly silences the President, and simply does not
report on crucial events, the rule of law is doing great!
When elections are stolen, the rule of law is doing great!
When courts refuse to enforce the law, the rule of law is doing great!
When the Supreme Court refuses to defend the Constitution, the rule of law is doing
great!
But when the people, literally, those whom the elected officials are supposed to represent,
demonstrate all day peacefully and then a few, not necessarily even Trump supporters (false
flags are very easy to organize with crowds!), storm the halls of Congress, then the GOP
bigshots take to the air and lament the "tragedy" of the law being violated.
No country and no regime can stand on such truly galactic levels of doublethink, hypocrisy
and cowardice. This is the beginning of the end of this regime. My thoughts tonight are with the "deplorables". In the prophetic words of George Orwell:
"If there was hope, it must lie in the proles, because only there, in those swarming
disregarded masses, eighty-five percent of the population of Oceania, could the force to
destroy the Party ever be generated. The Party could not be overthrown from within. Its
enemies, if it had any enemies, had no way of coming together or even of identifying one
another. Even if the legendary Brotherhood existed, as just possibly it might, it was
inconceivable that its members could ever assemble in larger numbers than twos and threes.
Rebellion meant a look in the eyes, an inflection of the voice; at the most, an occasional
whispered word. But the proles, if only they could somehow become conscious of their own
strength, would have no need to conspire. They need only to rise up and shake themselves like
a horse shaking off flies. If they chose they could blow the Party to pieces tomorrow
morning. Surely sooner or later it must occur to them to do it."
Orwell's "proles" are our "deplorables". And for all the self-evident weaknesses and
delusions, they are the only ones left, literally, and they will have to be the soil from which
the liberation of the USA will have to begin.
Trump did not fight for the "deplorables" . He allowed Antifa to trash the cities of
America with impunity, he allowed the techno-fascist elite to blatantly violate the first
amendment and he did not withdraw troops from foreign wars but rather shuffled them around a
bit to look like he was doing something, and he shut down and destroyed middle American
businesses in favor of Walmart and Amazon and even when warned, he allowed an election steal.
What a feckless f-ck head!
Why should "we" fight for him? And anyone with half a brain and a careful reading of
history knows that the VP is always the ace in the hole for the deep state . always. So what
is the surprise? Don't suborn!! -- Organize!!!
Trump didn't allow the cities to be trashed by Antifa and BLM. It was the Democrat
Governors who allowed the chaos and destruction. Get an education of what really happened and
who caused it. If you watched the crooked liars of CNN no wonder you are deceived!
Rightly, the conversation still revolves around what happened in D.C. on 6 January. What we
do not hear are the usual American homilies about coming together and unity. Quite the
opposite. There is talk of the 25th amendment or impeachment, and of " domestic terrorism ".
That is as an opinion poll showed
20% of all voters and 45% of Republicans supported the siege of the Capitol. Heuristics
elsewhere show that you cannot expect to run 'democratic BAU' with those kind of numbers saying
they don't buy into the system. As Philip Marey underlines again in his
latest note , this is a bitterly polarized society that no economic stimulus package is a
solution for .
Tablet Magazine also has a worrying take in "
The Five Crises of the American Regime " by Professor Michael Lind. Agree or disagree, it
is worth a serious read:
"In the past eight months, two Capitol Hills have fallen [Seattle and D.C.]. Two shocking
events symbolize the abdication of authority by America's ruling class, an abdication that
has led to what can be described, not without exaggeration, as the slow-motion disintegration
of the USA in its present form Many Democrats claim that Republicans are destroying the
republic. Many Republicans claim the reverse. They are both correct . As a rule, comparisons
between the US and Weimar Germany or late republican Rome are misleading, but when rival
elite political factions tolerate or encourage mob violence in the streets, the comparisons
might be forgiven."
Lind then goes on to list the US' Five Crises:
Political: " the centralization of power in a small number of ambitious elite factions and
coteries American politicians today tend to be picked by the small number of zealots of
various kinds who show up to vote in party primaries. The national parties themselves are no
longer functioning organizations, but mere brands. ";
Identity: "Neither America's partisan leaders nor their militant followers are any longer
restrained by a common sense of cross-party solidarity and shared American patriotism.";
Social: "People who are rooted in real communities do not make good foot soldiers in
partisan armies deployed by remote elites who are battling for control of government offices.
They have jobs they can't miss and children they have to pick up from school and errands to
run..";
Demographic: "The rise of unmarried and childless young Americans in their 20s and 30s who
can be mobilized by left and right for unrestricted partisan warfare "; and
Economic: "The strategy , encouraged by neoliberal Democrats and libertarian conservative
Republicans alike since the 1970s, has been to lower labour costs in the US American business
has also driven down wages by smashing unions in the private sector, which now have fewer
members -- a little more than 6% of the private sector workforce -- than they did under
Herbert Hoover."
For now the public debate and headlines remain instead of the latest " coup d'état "
(and even Hitler's 1923 failed Munich Beerhall putsch); and of the " coup de grâce " of
removing Trump from office, surely risking further polarisation when he will leave in less than
two weeks anyway. Fortunately, there was no risk of an actual coup of the kind seen in Thailand
dozens of times (and it deserves noting that in the Thai case recent coups were against
populist outsiders, not led by them.)
Indeed, Edward Luttwak --the author of the
literal handbook on coups -- has criticized Trump for not being conciliatory, and earlier,
but also argued " during the Capitol Hill riot, Wall St went up – traders were unmoved by
TV hysteria " as there was never any chance that Biden would not be sworn in on 20 January. Ask
yourself, would the markets really have rallied Wednesday if an *actual* US coup had been
happening?
Perhaps! Because to add another crisis to Lind's list, two coups arguably already
happened:
One was financialisation / central-bankification. Markets will tell you it's all about
the Fed, not the head (of state) . It doesn't really matter who sits in the Oval Office as
long as the Fed prints dollars with previous occupants on them. We also all know economies
without free elections are perfectly acceptable to Wall St; but asset bubbles as economic
policy makes central-bankification part of the polarisation problem not the solution: who
voted for this?
Second, rather than the head of state banning media, today the media bans the head of
state : Trump, still president, is now officially off Facebook, which had equally little
problem keeping major election-related news off ahead of 3 November. We all know that
economies without free speech are perfectly acceptable to Wall St too; but it will only
deepen political polarization as people move to new politicized platforms, neutral ground
disappears, and distrust builds further.
As Lind concludes:
"The painstaking reconstruction of the United States, if it takes place, is not one to be
met by 10-point plans and PowerPoints. First we must agree on the causes of the collapse of
the latest in a series of historic American regimes."
Well, Wall St does *not* like things that don't involve 10-point plans or PowerPoints; it
usually doesn't even like 9 points of a 10-point plan. Yet Lind's proposal would be a good
start, even if it isn't going to happen.
In the meantime, either buy into the reflation trade on the presumption that the new
administration will at least attempt to use economic stimulus to bridge the political divide;
or expect the worse and just buy Bitcoin , which is at over USD40,000 as even conservative
pension funds are apparently now getting interested. (" So, Mr and Mrs Smith, we've looked at
your risk appetite and retirement date, and we think that overall it's best to plan for a
post-nuclear apocalypse scenario. Have you considered studded-leather hot pants and bondage
mask producers? And have you thought about gasoline and water at all? They are going to be
quite the ticket!" )
But to end a troubling week on a positive note, Elon Musk is now the world's richest man -
provided he never sells any of his shares. So nature is healing.
play_arrow
eatapeach 5 minutes ago
It became all that fraud and lies that when Kennedy was murdered. Now *that* was a real
coup. Mossad, LBJ, and the MIC have bloody hands. LBJ got the Presidency, AIPAC did not have
to register as a foreign agent, and the MIC got more war. We've had insiders running the show
ever since. That includes Trump (a freemason) and Pence (a freemason) and Biden and almost
every other 'elected' official.
PGR88 31 minutes ago (Edited) remove link
American's don't yet seem to grasp that they just experienced a top-down color-revolution
/ coup. Tech oligarchs, big business and the media have fully revealed themselves as tools of
the statist, globalist elites.
After the staged "storming" false flag event, Congress to RE-CONVENE tonight and finish its final act of betrayal against America,
under the cloak of darkness
( Natural News ) Today's "storming" of the Capitol Building has already
been confirmed
as a false flag operation run by Antifa / BLM troops and pre-coordinated with Capitol Police as a way to discredit Trump supporters
in the media.
We now know that the people who led the storming of the building are the very same people who have previously been photographed
as active individuals at BLM rallies, matching their tattoos, facial hair and even worn equipment.
In addition, Antifa / BLM operators were transported to the event for the sole purpose of carrying out provocateur / false flag
operations. "According to a former FBI agent on the ground at the US Capitol, at least one bus load of Antifa goons infiltrated the
Trump rally as part of a false flag operation,"
reports The Gateway Pundit .
Now, we have learned that the treasonous Congress, led by traitors Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell were secretly plotting all
along to complete their act of betrayal against America under the cloak of night.
They have issued a press release found at this link, from the office of the Speaker of the House (Pelosi):
It begins, "Dear Colleague to All Members on Continuation of the Joint Session of Congress" and then claims the attack on the
Capitol Buliding was a "shameful assault on our democracy," blaming it fully on President Trump.
Then the letter explains how treasonous members of Congress plan to vote to accept the fraudulent Biden slate of electors later
tonight, after Capitol Police had cleared out the protesters with tear gas and
by shooting
at least one unarmed protester in the neck . From the letter:
To that end, in consultation with Leader Hoyer and Whip Clyburn and after calls to the Pentagon, the Justice Department and
the Vice President, we have decided we should proceed tonight at the Capitol once it is cleared for use. Leader Hoyer will be sending
out more guidance later today.
We always knew this responsibility would take us into the night. The night may still be long but we are hopeful for a shorter
agenda, but our purpose will be accomplished.
They planned this all along
First, they use BLM and Antifa operatives to "storm" the Capitol Building with the help of police, who coordinated the entire
thing. Watch the following videos that show the Capitol Police openly ushering "protesters" into the build. They actually invited
them in!
Once the "storming" was complete, the Capitol Police deployed tear gas to remove all the protesters, while Trump was forced to
tell everybody to go home.
With the Capitol Building now cleared out, they call the joint session of Congress back into existence, with no one around
to observe what they are doing , and they commit their final act of treason against America by accepting the Biden slate of electors
to install CCP puppet Joe Biden as president.
Note that this is exactly how they rigged the elections in the first place: By removing all GOP observers, blocking windows and
acting like they had "paused" the counting when, in reality, they re-convened the rigged counting in the middle of the night and
kept feeding fraudulent votes into Dominion machines until they had produced enough votes to "win."
This is how Democrats and the deep state operate: It's 100% staged, always carried out in the dark of night, always based on deception,
false narratives and a complicit media that's happy to lie to the American public.
Your country is being stolen from you tonight. They are doing it while they think the nation is asleep. And by the time you wake
up -- just like on November 4th -- you will discover that you've lost your country to a group of pedophile criminal thugs
who desire power above all else.
Pray for God to intervene, or this nation is finished at the hands of filthy, treasonous betrayers like Mike Pence and Mitch McConnell.
Daniel does not understand that the problem is the loss of legitimacy of neoliberal elite. Which staged a false flag operation
with ransacking the Capitol to swipe under the rug election fraud charges.
And the problem is not only due to cooked elections.
The problem is Biden administration which consists of all rabid neoliberals and warmongers. This is a silly hysterical reaction on events, no so much of analysis that we would expect from this author.
This was a protest that was hijacked for nefarious purposes, which is python for any color revolution. Probably infiltrated and subverted but still a protest against Washington neoliberal political elite. Against
all those Schumers, Pelosis, McConnells, Romeys and other enablers of financial oligarchy in both parties
A large part of the nation does not accept the election as legitimate. That's the fact.
I take serious offense to this article regarding Trump. You say this cannot be tolerated? Can the following actions by the
democrats be tolerated:
1) dead people voting
2) people putting in change of address forms in order to be able to vote but are not legal residents of the state
3) changing voting laws so that its impossible to confirm the identity of the voter (fraud)
4) how about hiding boxes of ballots under tables and then telling the tabulators and observers to go home before scanning them
multiple times (caught on video)
5) how about voting machines using the internet to send voting tabulations to Germany and China
But wait...you say fraudulent voting can be tolerated because its an issue for courts, governor, legislature, election officials...so
lets take a look at the antifa/black lives matters riots in Portland, Seattle, Chicago, Ferguson, NYC, Baltimore and elsewhere
1) how about obstructing vehicle traffic, pulling people out of cars and trucks to assault/murder them
2) how about obstructing vehicles with mothers and children...beating the car with fists and bats and pipes
3) how about harrassing people at eating at public restaurants, intimidating them to kneel or raise a fist or apologize for being
white
4) how about vandalizing businesses and residences, tearing down statues
5) how about acts of violence and arson
5) how about shooting civilians and cops, or burning down police precincts with police still inside the building which is an act
of pre-meditated murder.
6) how about autonomous zones which are acts of sedition and treason against the country WHOSE ACTIONS DESERVE TO BE SCRUTINIZED BECAUSE THEY ARE INTOLERABLE IN A DEMOCRACY BECAUSE THE WAY 40-50% OF AMERICANS
SEE IT...IT IS THE DEMOCRATS THAT ARE DESTROYING OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC AND THEN ACTING LIKE THE VICTIM WHEN THEIR ACTIONS
RESULT IN A BACKLASH....and if Trump is punished or impeached then your going to initiate an even greater backlash...because it
is very clear that the actions of the democrats will never be held accountable and the actions of the republicans will be scrutinized,
demonized, criminalized and prosecuted. That is best described as a totalitarian dictatorship, a one party state ruled by a permanent
aristocracy. The democrats are closer to Hitler and Stalin than they are to our once pluralistic nation of freedom of speech,
freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, social mobility, objectivity in the press and transparency in our elections.
To the author of the article, you are a POS. People were praised who rushed the Supreme Court during the Kavanaugh bullshit.
These people have looked to others sources than the media and know there was fraud. And if you do not you are one dishonest SOB.
Inciting violence?
Rubbish. DJT called for protesters to return home
Steal the election?
Absolute rubbish. All DJT was for was an accurate tally. There is more than enough evidence of voter fraud.
Negative votes, ballots run through tally machines multiple times, observers ejected from facilities, underage voters, voters
with illegitimate addresses, illegal rule modifications, more voters in precincts than adults (much less eligible voters), etc.
One hundred people have signed affidavits attesting to having witnessed voting/tally abuses (risking prison once submitted to
Congress or courts) and a thousand others have declared their intent to testify if so called
And when adhering to the law becomes an "abuse of power" we no longer have a representative government
Election Integrity... whose to say that the states where the majority voted read didn't
commit fraud? Because Biden was leading in Texas before switching to Trump, same goes with
Florida and even South Carolina. Yet those states aren't being questioned, accused or
investigated. This country is suffering from sore loser syndrome: 2016 and 2020.
The evidence has been illegally destroyed to cover their tracks. It was hands down rigged
with no dispute, but good luck proving it at all when it's all been shredded, burned, buried,
or assassinated. And to do so in 10days, unfortunately is impossible.
Too bad that it seems like DemRats had a plan to distorted the objections with Antifa! Why these people were able to
entered the Capitol so easy. They played all the supporters! Someone inside might be involved!
I can't believe that R congress backed down so quickly.... as if rogue "protesters" can erase the vast amounts of fraud
in the election. That is exactly what Dems count on. I am tired of The GOP being a doormat! On the whole, the Antifa and
BLM protests were way more reckless, severe, and concerning. So we should just let the Dems continue to rig elections
and give them the country? Disgusting!
Leaders in both major parties have ignored average US citizens for many years while selling themselves to the highest bidders
(including foreign interests). A relatively small percentage of protestors turned violent and they should be condemned by
everyone, but politicians who don't actually serve US citizens are a major problem. Politicians and their families have become
rich from abusing political office for personal benefit rather than serving the people.
I haven't heard much about this charge being made by Maria Zack that an affidavit was
delivered yesterday concerning a whistleblower that allegedly was delivered to Kemp, Meadows.
It's about frankfurt and dominion software shenangians. I figured Lin Wood would know about
it if theres' anything here, but he's suspended from twitter.
"...the election wasn't "stolen". Down ballot republicans outperformed Trump. That's a
really, really difficult way to steal an election..." Lex@85
The Republicans steal elections regularly. They do so by suppressing votes from poor and
black areas, by disenfranchising millions of 'felons' (few of whom are actually guilty of
felony) and gerrymandering House seats. Of course they also gerrymander electoral districts
in the States too, which allows them to keep control.
The Democrats are no better. In fact they wrote the book on the arts of
disenfranchisement, from Gerry to Daley. Their specialty is ballot box stuffing.
The big difference is that this year the Republicans were confident that the usual
measures, which in the South include suppression of the black vote by intimidation,
(something that shows in the low level of black participation in rural areas and small
towns-where everyone knows what everyone else is doing and most employers are white) would do
the trick. It generally does because the Democrats are not really interested in taking power
at the State level or, for that matter, in Congress where-as the stimulus cheque and defence
budget votes showed- they find it embarrassing when they have to choose their oligarch
sponsors over their 'base. Obama was obviously relieved when in 2010 the Republicans swept
the mid term elections and took the "Change" he had been elected on off the agenda. After
that he just cruised through his last six years governing like his hero Reagan.
It is one of the most potent myths being manufactured by the media that the election this
year was fair. It wasn't. The need for reform, beginning with the re-empowerment of the Civil
Rights Act enforcement mechanisms, is something that must be imposed on the Democrats, who
will fight against it because their control over the southern black vote depends on the
maintenance of the current system.
And then there are the obvious and major Constitutional changes needed- the closing of the
Electoral College system; the Senate, where it is possible for something like 20% of the
electorate to control the majority of the 100 seats, has to be changed. Its current position
is that of the British House of Lords in 1832.
All the sound and the fury of this very suspicious looking 'riot' shouldn't be allowed to
block out the reality which is that, Trump or Biden, nothing is changed. The Biden
administration is likely to be every bit as bad as Trump's, only the media will love it.
In the real world there is frustration. And it is entirely justified-living standards are
plummeting and pessimism about the future is prevalent. But revolutions don't come from anger
they come from reform movements stymied: when people realise that the only hope of any change
is complete change-revolution- and feel ready to take the reins of power into their own
hands, that is when revolutions occur.
"Realise" is the key word. Political consciousness means understanding of reality, not belief
in weird and unsupportable theories whether they involve God or The Jews or oligarchical
cabals intent on buying up small businesses by inventing pandemics or secret moves to smuggle
microchips into brains to turn humanity into zombies. And the reality is that we live in a
capitalist empire dominated by the determination of the exploiting class to protect its
system from the threat, long understood but only ever realised episodically, of democracy. Of
equality. Of liberty and treating each other as the siblings, parents and children that we
all are.
That's the essence of identify politics. The key idea is put various groups at each other
throat so that neoliberal oligarchs are safe. If you do not understand this you understand
nothing...
Journalist Matt Taibbi joined Hill.TV's "Rising" on Thursday and suggested that partisan
media circles resulted in echo chambers that have left many Americans without factual, reliable
sources of information.
Taibbi told hosts Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti that those who stormed the U.S. Capitol
grounds on Wednesday were victims of misinformation and conspiracy theories resulting from
these echo chambers.
"We have two basically conflicting media ecosystems...and what ends up happening when people
get an uninterrupted stream of information of this type for long enough, is they just
completely lose their ability to assess situations rationally, and they will eventually lash
out," Taibbi said.
Partisan media sources, Taibbi added, are driving "different groups to hate each other."
Trump Campaign Senior Advisor Kayleigh McEnany previews Trump's remarks ahead of Georgia
rally and reacts to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger releasing phone call with
Trump.
Looks more and more like pre-planned provocations that spontaneous breach of Capitol
security
Notable quotes:
"... Filming the incident from behind Babbit , however, was Utah resident John Sullivan - founder of the far-left organization "Insurgence USA" who made headlines in July after he was arrested for intimidating drivers in Provo. Sullivan was interviewed by the Daily Mail and CNN following Wednesday's shooting - both of which failed to provide a satisfactory answer as to why he was there in the first place. ..."
"... What was Sullivan doing there? ..."
"... Because it was all scripted theater. Wake up people, you've been trapped in a mind cage your entire life. ..."
"... and within hours the building was secured and highest officials, the most cherished assets of our democracy (cough cough) went back and resumed the process. My local grocery store has a 24 hour clean-up law if they suspect a Covid case entered the premises ..."
"... They Capitol Police did their job alright.... https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/vision-emerges-of-police-moving-barricades-to-allow-rioters-into-us-capitol-taking-selfies/news-story/45a9be3adf9b447b53d23cf5536c5d02 ..."
"... Note the guy who is already behind the barricades (in a hoodie) who is waving the people forward. And it DOES look like the cops let them in. Unbelievable. If only there were real investigative journalists working on this story. ..."
"... Cui bono? ( Who benefits? ) Who benefitted from yesterday's event? Who was harmed? "Trump supporters" or conservatives certainly did not benefit. Leftist who want to expedite an increasingly totalitarian regime certainly did benefit. ..."
"... But it's obvious that the braintrust who concocted this event also wanted to twist the knife into Trump when he only has 12 (!) days left in office. It was clear he is/was a lame duck. Again, what else is going on here? Or is this simply an example of kicking a man who's already virtually out the door? What's with this 25th Amendment talk? ..."
"... To be fair, the CIA et. al. have been researching mind control since at least 1900 and they used WWI and every other conflict since as testing grounds for their theories and techniques. ..."
"... The whole scene stinks of a setup. The police pulled the barricades aside and invited them through. BLM thugs were on scene to video (and who knows what else). People breaking windows (whoever they might be) were booed by protesters. Were they antifa acting as agents provocateurs? The media and Democrat politicos were all set to demonize the protesters. ..."
During yesterday's protest in Washington D.C., a Turmp-supporting US Air Force Veteran,
Ashli Babbitt, was shot dead by a Capitol Police officer (
who has been placed on leave ) as she attempted to climb through a broken window to bypass
a barricade, along with other Trump supporters.
Filming the incident from behind
Babbit , however, was Utah resident John Sullivan - founder of the far-left organization
"Insurgence USA" who made headlines in July after he was arrested for intimidating drivers in
Provo. Sullivan was interviewed by the
Daily Mail and CNN following Wednesday's shooting - both of which failed to provide a
satisfactory answer as to why he was there in the first place.
Sullivan told the Mail that "he was not at the Capitol as part of the protest but did not
specify what exactly brought him there. "
Update: Sent in to ZH tips by reader Tony G.
Meanwhile, Trump supporters physically stopped someone from trying to break into the Capitol
Building.
What was Sullivan doing there?
LeadPipeDreams 3 hours ago remove link
Why Was Founder Of Far-Left BLM Group Filming Inside Capitol As Police Shot
Protester?
Because it was all scripted theater. Wake up people, you've been trapped in a mind cage
your entire life.
Mtnrunnr 3 hours ago
Or maybe agitators for both groups are just agitators and aren't there to progress
society.
4DegreesOfSeparation 3 hours ago
Who was in the Capitol, all you need to do is look at social media:
On the Proud Boys' Parler account - which is a Twitter-style social media platform - an
image of Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's desk was posted along with the message: "We
will not back down."
And on their Telegram site, the militia group boasted of terrifying politicians.
They wrote: "For several hours, our collective strength had politicians in Washington in
absolute terror.
"The treacherous pawns (cops) were also terrified."
- demoralize conservatives by convince them of fraudulent elections
- false flag
- white conservatives are vilified
- website to publicly identify who's a "white supremacist"
- eliminate the problem: Q mentioned " sealed indictments " are YOU, not the pedo
elites.
If we consider today's Pelosi's Trump impeachment idea, now in his last 14 days, then it
all makes sense as a Farce to Rattle the White Conservatives and vilify us to have an excuse
to corral us. Even so called conservative talking heads (Ingraham 4eg) are condemning the
peaceful visit to the Capitol where the police opened the barricades and guided the crisis
actors around the building. The 4chan autists tend to be right more often than not.
Kiss_My_Schnitzel_Again 1 hour ago
I find it ironic that you clowns didn't read the article clearly stating with facts that
ANTIFA was disguised as Trump supporters. Do liberals even read and comprehend?
champ2top 37 minutes ago (Edited)
Its about time the politicians experienced some fear. They don't seem to mind American
business owners, police, woman and children in their homes being terrorized and murdered in
their places of business by the Democrat Antifa and BLM groups. Why should Pelosi who is
voted in by a small handful of people in Northern California be treated differently than the
people who voted her in? She shouldn't. She is a root cause of the division we have today.
Maybe Pelosi should have come out and addressed the crowd and earned some Kudo's from the
Trump supporters. Not her style as a dictator.
Fluff The Cat 6 minutes ago (Edited)
As I've repeatedly said, Proud Boys are a controlled opposition outfit. Gavin McInnes is
one of the co-founders, a self-described "pro-gay, pro-Israel, virulently anti-racist
libertarian." He shoved a dildo up his rear on video and kissed Milo Yiannopoulos. Up until a
short while ago he was a contributor to (((Rebel Media))).
C'mon folks, sort it out.
joyful-feet 2 hours ago (Edited)
Viking man is a professional actor. The protest was bait and lure for conservatives. Link
to his backstage actor profile.
They already scripted what was going to happen and you can see by the coordinated rapid
response in action to now condemn and steal more freedoms and liberties of Americans as a
response. You can bet from now on the full power and weight of the US government will be to
monitor, track, and surveil YOU patriot.
Democrats and Republicans have been working together since 2016 to craft this whole
situation out scene by scene. How many know that Steven Mnuchin of the Treasury is also an
Actor/Director? https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6518391/
champ2top 33 minutes ago
I thought I recognized Susan Serandon in Trump garb amongst the crowd in the Capitol. I
guess during Covid Actors will take just about any job for a few dollars.
Giant 1 hour ago
Old commie tactic, infiltrate real movement and act as agent provocateur to further the
goals of your cruel paymasters, if hijacking is not possible. On the up side, this will ''red
pill'' every person with brains. Trump might have been a fool to try to ''make deals'' with
sociopaths, but he sure ripped the curtain and showed people what really goes on behind the
stage. Sad to say, but people who can not see what's going on are too stupid to be reliable
and should be treated like that. ''Re-unification'' my arse!
Son of Loki 3 hours ago (Edited)
Looking more and more like an assassination. She was not armed and obviously no threat to anyone. In fact, she was standing between
several police and SS guys in suits. Yet that guy took aim and shot her point blank aiming
for her head but got her in the neck with one lethal bullet. Who was the killer?
walküre 3 hours ago
the follow-up question should be, was she the intended target?
BigMama 1 hour ago
Based on the New York Post video it appears credible that Ashli Babbitt was the likely
intended victim. Her assassin was approximately 20-30 feet away from a clear target framed in
the top shattered glass panel of the cross-corridor separating partition.
Billy the Poet 2 hours ago
So if it looks like the woman was murdered for no apparent reason ...
snatchpounder PREMIUM 3 hours ago
Sullivan is an agent of the state and he was there to make the snuff film of Ashli
Babbitt. This is so obvious Stevie Wonder could see it and Antifa and BLM scum bags are
jerking each other off after watching said snuff film. Sullivan and other degenerates like
him will be used up and when they're of no use to TPTSB he'll be the star in a snuff
film.
Make_Mine_A_Double 33 minutes ago
Staged litbard version of the Reichstag fire - with the complicity of the Feds and
Donkeytards.
Banned Banana 3 hours ago
As someone pointed out in another thread, inside the Capitol there were men calmly and
clearly explaining why the election was a fraud. He was inside to help stop that, and they
succeeded.
walküre 3 hours ago
and within hours the building was secured and highest officials, the most cherished assets
of our democracy (cough cough) went back and resumed the process. My local grocery store has a 24 hour clean-up law if they suspect a Covid case entered the
premises
Banned Banana 3 hours ago
Well yeah but the pigs in Congress weren't worried about Covid because they were
protected. Here's my congressman's tweet from yesterday:
Because your rulers own the intelligence agencies. That's why. They have been working
against the American people all along and they are dangerous as hell.
Remember September 11, the dancing Mossad agents, Larry Silverstein, Mossad Epstein
Honeypot, etc?
Remember the ISIS compound NM local police discovered and the feds saved? Remember weapons
of mass destruction and the US weapons grade anthrax letters? Remember all the mass shootings
that turn on and off like a light switch while pushing for taking your second amendment?
Remember the Corona hoax with killer lockdowns, threaten to starve 160 million
already?
Get sophisticated quick. Nobody has time for stupid.
BangDingOw 2 hours ago
Speaking of the fake mass shootings...hardly anyone has noticed that there have been no
mass shootings since covid. We were averaging one a month since the propaganda act repeal in
2012 (averaged one a year before 2012). Covid hits...poof, gone. So I ask the sheep: are mass
shooters that afraid of covid or was it all fake to start with? Logically , those are the
only possible explanations. The sheep don't have much of an answer for that question.
daveO 2 hours ago
Remember weapons of mass destruction and the US weapons grade anthrax letters? From Ft.
Detrick, which was shut down on August 1st, 2019 ahead of this Scamdemic...
nope-1004 3 hours ago (Edited)
Why Was Founder Of Far-Left BLM Group Filming Inside Capitol As Police Shot Protester? Because the left war machine hired them, and the police were told to allow entry.
Richard Chesler 3 hours ago
It'll show as "professional services" in the Clinton Foundation balance sheet.
mr1963 3 hours ago
Raise your hand if you think all this evidence will make a bit of difference? The die is
cast people. You're on the most wanted list now and forever. Wake up, they are manipulating
the whole of the country against people who freely elected a man to the office of the
President -- TWICE -- because you had the audacity to elect him. They have destroyed him and
you're next.
USAllDay 3 hours ago
Truth be told, Antifa and Trump supporters do have some common ground. I (jokingly) said
two years ago if Antifa burned down the capital I might have to go buy some black cloths. I
think talk of Antifa its a distraction. Antifa doesn't hold the keys to the Capital. This
goes way above Antifa. The Capital is a fortress, it only gets breached if its allowed to be
breached. Notice there is zero outrage at the Capital Police utterly failing to do their
job.
Note the guy who is already behind the barricades (in a hoodie) who is waving the people
forward. And it DOES look like the cops let them in. Unbelievable. If only there were real
investigative journalists working on this story.
putaipan 2 hours ago
two things i am hearing most in all msm coverage- 1) repeated use of the word
"insurgents", thereby negating the effect of any trump potential use of said act (btw...i
never heard for certain if the insurgency act was in fact withdrawn in the 5000 pages of the
covid relief bill) and 2) way more important, and hearing it everywhere- the stoking of
racial tension by describing the white priviledge shown towards the protesters. stoke stoke
stoke that civil war baby.
BigJim 1 hour ago (Edited)
Yes, the unfortunate Ms Babitt certainly got treated in accordance with her White
privilege.
sun tzu 3 hours ago
Antifa are deep state
Give Me Some Truth 3 hours ago
The Deep State uses Antifa.
sun tzu 3 hours ago
Just like all Qaeda and ISIS
domoga 2 hours ago
Based on what I see, that was one cold blooded murder.
Give Me Some Truth 2 hours ago
Cui bono? ( Who benefits? ) Who benefitted from yesterday's event? Who was harmed? "Trump supporters" or conservatives certainly did not benefit. Leftist who want to
expedite an increasingly totalitarian regime certainly did benefit.
Give Me Some Truth 2 hours ago (Edited)
God no. Which actually makes me wonder what's really going on here and why? I get that the
"Trump supporters" have now been besmirched and casts as villains. But it's obvious that the
braintrust who concocted this event also wanted to twist the knife into Trump when he only
has 12 (!) days left in office. It was clear he is/was a lame duck. Again, what else is going
on here? Or is this simply an example of kicking a man who's already virtually out the door?
What's with this 25th Amendment talk?
daveO 1 hour ago
Because P!zz@G@te is real. See General Flynn's persecution. His last judge was named
Emmett Sullivan and an Obama appointee.
Meanwhile, McConnell's wife just resigned from the Cabinet, no doubt to help the 25th
amendment invocation and blacklisting Trump from running again.
montanaconserv 2 hours ago
The left did benefit.. they are currently trying to arrange for an impeachment of a
Lame-duck President with only 2 weeks left to go... they have successfully shut out any
conservative thought or opinion on most social media applications.... how can you say the
left hasn't benefited from this?
Give Me Some Truth 2 hours ago (Edited)
I did say the Left was the clear beneficiary for the reasons you gave, plus others. So
people and organizations in the Left are the obvious "primary suspect."
Zero-Hegemon 2 hours ago
Why was he there? Because the whole thing was staged to derail the congressional evidence
and protests to out all of the election fraud. The surrender caucus folded like a house of
cards at the first hint of bad breath.
Give Me Some Truth 2 hours ago (Edited)
It seems to me the real story here is that the mainstream press WON'T investigate real
stories.
Everything I've seen so far comes from independent or alternative news sites.
Needless to say, Drudge doesn't have any of these headlines.
GRDguy 2 hours ago
That's because MSM major holders are the same sociopaths that control CME, which controls
Comex, which manipulates the price of precious metal. Leading sociopaths all work together
when it benefits them and destroys the 96% who are not sociopathic.
daveO 2 hours ago
Meanwhile, CME open interest on BTC has grown over 15X's in last year. Pumping it up.
SomethingClever 1 hour ago (Edited)
Your comment made me think of the 1% who must all be members of the 4% sociopath group.
Now that makes a lot of sense.
Give Me Some Truth 2 hours ago
Once upon a time, though, he would have been running at least some of these headlines. I
doubt he even picks the stories to run or not run anymore. Someone else - who he sold out to
(literally or figuratively) now makes the site's editorial decisions.
ExpressConcerns 2 hours ago
he was there for the same reason that the DC police invited protesters inside -- for the
show
rjk0279 2 hours ago (Edited)
That was the nothing fence but what about getting in the building. It's not an automatic
door like grocery store.
SomethingClever 1 hour ago
To be fair, the CIA et. al. have been researching mind control since at least 1900 and
they used WWI and every other conflict since as testing grounds for their theories and
techniques.
Their diligence and persistence has paid off with remarkably effective brainwashing
capabilities. For many brainwashed sheep, it was not their fault, the technologies are
expertly applied and the results are repeatable - look at all the 'color revolutions' around
the world.
Ruff_Roll 2 hours ago
The whole scene stinks of a setup. The police pulled the barricades aside and invited them
through. BLM thugs were on scene to video (and who knows what else). People breaking windows
(whoever they might be) were booed by protesters. Were they antifa acting as agents
provocateurs? The media and Democrat politicos were all set to demonize the protesters.
CriswellSpeaks 1 hour ago
Don't they have a ultrasonic weapon that's supposed to be able to drive crowds away from
the capital buildings? They probably didn't have it turned on because they wanted the attack
happening.
USAllDay 3 hours ago
Remember what that child molester Mike Pence said yesterday "Violence is never the answer"
... you know except for the:
-Revolutionary war
-War of 1812
-Civil War
-World war 1
-World war 2
-Korea
-Vietnam
-Iraq
-Libya
-Afganistan
-Syria
and never mind Waco or Ruby Ridge. And this is a very very short list.
Give Me Some Truth 2 hours ago
Violence WAS the answer when the Trump administration bombed Syria twice because Assad
"gassed his own people" and blew up an Iranian general in his car for the crime of going to
Iraq, where he was invited.
fnsnook 2 hours ago
you seem to think the original miga party is going to be different.
GRDguy 2 hours ago
Nice list of leading sociopaths fighting other sociopaths over control of the masses,
financed by sociopathic financiers to whom lyin' and stealin' is their way of life.
creviceCaress 2 hours ago
speaking of the greatest purveyor of violence recorded history has seen, for a more
insightful look at an exhaustive track record of u.s.s.a.(and friends) take a look at
on the justice of roosting chickens - ward churchill
and if you happen by a thrift store buy all the black tactical-looking gear/clothes you
can find.
Goat of Steverino 48 minutes ago (Edited)
PERHAPS HE MISTOOK THE CAPITOL BUILDING AND THE CROWD AS PEOPLE LOOTING A SNEAKER STORE
..... AND DECIDED TO JOIN IN
deus ex machina 31 minutes ago
That was pretty funny queerino. You feeling okay?
TryingSomethingNew 19 minutes ago
He's a GS-6 equivalent for the CIA. He comes from a military family (thus, hired
preferentially)???
Nasgob 2 hours ago
I mean its pretty obvious what happened... Establishment needed a contingency plan to
never allow Trump to run again or have a chance at staying in the White House so they enabled
and incited his followers to break into the capitol so they could frame him for use of the
insurrection act. Not hard to figure out. Open the gates to enable "breach," leave weapons
all around the ground for any who are feeling extra emotional, break a few windows and tell
supporters to go in, lead supporters down specific hallways guarded by 1 police officer in
order to create desired imagery for use in the media. Sprinkle a few Soros funded Antifa
actors to make things run smoothly... Wouldn't be surprised if they try to put Trump in
prison for a while too, of course citing their self incited "insurrection."
Give Me Some Truth 1 hour ago
They "sprinkled" more than a few Antifa professional instigators into the crowd. And all
of them seemed to make their way to the exterior walls of the Capitol before just about
everyone else.
domoga 2 hours ago
This is all from George Soros playbook
Give Me Some Truth 2 hours ago
And the CIA has probably staged the same type of events in countless countries at
countless "protests."
domoga 2 hours ago
Yep
Buck Fanks 2 hours ago
Crisis actors and agent provocateurs as far as the eye can see. Not denying the woman shot
was a patriot, but I fear she died for another agenda.
fanbeav 3 hours ago
Everyone needs to turn off any news. They are all scripted theater and their job is to
make you think the opposite of what is actually happening. Communism and Socialism will be
implemented and you will never be told the truth again!
Tigbits 2 hours ago
Haven't watched in months. It's all lies and propaganda.
ThomasJefferson69 1 hour ago (Edited)
I think one of the terms is called a frame up. They instigate the violence and film it. I
am sure he was well paid. Guessing Soros wrote the check.
1CSR2SQN 1 hour ago
I bet Uncle Sam wrote the check with your money.
ThomasJefferson69 1 hour ago
Well considering everyone is getting checks I can't disagree that he got money from the
government. However I am sure he got paid extra, through one of Soros many "charitable"
organizations. Obviously that man saw a lot of human pain as a Nazi, and gets off on it.
Snaffew 2 hours ago
If you watched the actors break the window to get into the capitol...they were extremely
careful to just break the glass and not the wooden muntins that separate the panes. Then they
were escorted by police to the house chambers.
This is just like Pelosi's false flag garage door event where no paint made it onto the
bricks because shielding was in place.
Can the Dems do anything right? Even false flag events are pathetic in their
authenticity---
chiquita 2 hours ago
There were a bunch of jokes made about how protesters were walking around *inside* the
velvet ropes and they were taking pictures--videos of it too. Clearly, these were not violent
people who were in there trying to do bad things--fits that narrative about some people
thinking they were led in there to go on a tour.
Ms No PREMIUM 3 hours ago
They want you to see that the Intel agencies and their proxy groups did this.
This is a show of force and attempt at demoralization of the many that know. They want you
to see them as all powerful.
They have been displaying this in many ways for a while now, uncloaking. What is sad is
that even when they display it some can't see it still due to their filters.
daveO 1 hour ago
Yes, that's it. They will now target right wing personalities. Jerome Corsi said last
night, on the radio, that he was being shut down. January 13th is coming up. I suspect they
will "remove" one that day, like they did Scalia on 2/13/16.
Oliver Klozoff 3 hours ago
Narratives no longer matter.
The US is a captive nation.
Ms No PREMIUM 3 hours ago
An occupied people. Have been for a long time.
ComradePuff 3 hours ago
why? because the groups are the same: deep state agents playing both sides. It is a deep
state LARP to infiltrate, misdirect, co-opt and discredit actual activism.
paxmundi 3 hours ago
Maybe we need to ratchet it down and go back to Occam's Razor.
It's not a false flag.
It's not the Deep State.
It's MAGA retards.
No_Pretzel_Logic 3 hours ago
A rube in denial. ^^^ Gotta love useful idiots.
Give Me Some Truth 2 hours ago
Okay. Prove it. Question all of these people and see if the really are "MAGA." It
shouldn't take Sherlock Holmes to find these people with all the photos and videos of them.
If someone did do this, we'd learn who the instigators really are. But this probably won't
happen.
sun tzu 2 hours ago
Same thing happened to the Occupy Wall Street and anti-globalist movement in Seattle
during the 90's
Bay of Pigs 16 minutes ago
As usual, the official government narrative is falling apart.
Funny how that happens?
youshallnotkill 12 minutes ago
So Trump is not part of the government now?
Leonard T. Bayard 17 minutes ago
The Democrats stole the election. Antifa infiltrated stop the steal rally.
I have to ask, are the Democrats really that smart? Or is the average Republican just not
that bright...
The Last but not LeastTechnology is dominated by
two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand ~Archibald Putt.
Ph.D
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available
to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social
issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which
such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.
This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free)
site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should
be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...
You can use PayPal to make a contribution, supporting development
of this site and speed up access. In case softpanorama.org is down you can use the at softpanorama.info
Disclaimer:
The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or
referenced source) and are
not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the author present and former employers, SDNP or any other organization the author may be associated with.We do not warrant the correctness
of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose.
The site uses AdSense so you need to be aware of Google privacy policy. You you do not want to be
tracked by Google please disable Javascript for this site. This site is perfectly usable without
Javascript.